what are the political implications of AI destroying the livelihoods of artists and journalists?
what are the political implications of AI destroying the livelihoods of artists and journalists?
what are the political implications of AI destroying the livelihoods of artists and journalists?
The gnomish parasite and his chud minions hates the AI Art because it will bring back REAL White people Art.
>AI Art because it will bring back REAL White people Art.
by having robotic facsimile, great. can't wait for mr Goldiggenstein to then withdraws the AI unless you get a subscription+relinquish rights for all the art generated and sue anyone using it illegaly. you want to save white art? make it yourself instead of training the tool that will enslave you.
>make it yourself
I do, Stable Diffusion is open source.
you're not making anything, no more than a guy ordering at a restaurant cooks his meal. I know you're ESL but come on.
>Stable Diffusion is open source.
ah yes, that sure will protect you from the garden gnomes, keep tightening those shackles.
>that sure will protect you from the garden gnomes
yes, its open source.
I noticed Stupid people seem to have a problem understanding what open source means.
cope more paintpig.
>mr Diamongrabstein has decreeted unlicensed AI-generated art is now illegal.
>"b-but muh open source!"
granted, a highly simplified example, the garden gnomes like to wrap laws within layers of doublespeak and context but gg, you're fucked. I know it's hard for you to imagine an example without using an AI but please bear with us...it's also ironic given the propensity of your country to enact ridiculous laws.
moron they cant even stop people from torrenting movies.
yes, keep hoping and posting the same, very narrow pictures.
>"my PC is safe, you know"
>"B-based AI will save art!"
either you'll have to pay garden gnomes for it or you'll impoverish human creativity by delegating your creative power. either way you lose unless you are an artist who can use it for very specific part of the workflow.
only if you promise to post more copes.
the only one coping is the one posting portrait doing nothing but vaguely looking in a direction with the same lighting. if you can't pick out the flaws in those drawings you have no position of authority to talk about what's good. like every pleb you get dazzled by rendering and disregard everything else that makes a piece good.
Nobody cares what art critics think
they are going to keep using AI to produce interesting content and you can pound sand for all your opinion matters to them.
>art critics
it's called having fucking taste, nothing to do with vacuous "critique". things like composition, subject, lighting, consistency
>they are going to keep using AI to dish out goyslop
ftfy
Who are you to tell others that they can't define what looks good to them? That's a preposterous notion
cope
You're nitpicking the technology of today. I'm saying we can take an educated guess where this will be in 5-10 years and it will absolutely become indistinguishable from human master artists. Your days of selling jap waifu drawings to coomers for $10 are coming to an end my poor paintpig fren
>Your days of selling jap waifu drawings to coomers for $10 are coming to an end my poor paintpig fren
that's a lot of assumptions, I guess the thought how current artists having skills is completely impossible to you, must be mediocre deviantart rejects that is against your glorious machine overlord!
There are lots of amazing artists who are insanely talented. In 10 years, you won't be able to distinguish between their work and something a computer made faster than you can blink.
>position of authority to talk about what's good.
that's exactly what the dinosaurs of every dead artform have said
they yelled it pathetically while being throw down the cliffs of inevitabilty
>Everything made illegal just goes away you know
You never created something in your life german npc, keep filling your computer with generated garbage!
I don't think its a human, it lacks human perspective in its messages
That is what they are doing, garden gnome. They won't use a shovel when there is an Earth Mover. Shut the fuck up. Your money printer is next.
>Gex
>The gnomish parasite and his chud minions hates the AI Art because it will bring back REAL White people Art.
Holy based Gex
>Gex
I miss that lil bro like you wouldnt believe
TIME TO SHUT IT DOWN!
>REAL White people Art.
That's clearly anime
LOL learn 2 code
I make 28/hr as a general labourer
AI can code better
AI Code isn't replacing me, it's making me irreplacable. Plenaire plebs will never understand this.
Any virtual task is effortless for a neural network you moron
I don't think you know the meaning of word 'effort'
Delusional
take your subhuman marketing garbage elsewhere, advertisement is against the fucking rules
>AI already made novels that won awards.
fake news, I keep asking, no delivery to date
Not true. Look how long it took to make computers moderately able to answer question…decades. It’s still not sentient so it won’t replace a competent human. You could train ai in a way it recommended suicide if you wanted. It’s dumb and just a tool.
It's exponential retard, once it figures it out it will figure the next ask out 1,000,000x, how are you memeflaggots so fucking stupid
Wow cope. It’s a digital task anon… you’re already out the door in some places
Have fun coding after I cut out your electricity
>LOL learn 2 code
ChatGPT can already code like a junior programmer
Regurgitating tutorials doesn't make one a coder... Oh wait, fuck, we're done. Pack it up Dev boys. I'm sure we can lay bricks or something.
>Regurgitating tutorials doesn't make one a coder... Oh wait, fuck, we're done. Pack it up Dev boys. I'm sure we can lay bricks or something.
You've never seen indian IT in action.
That is his point retard.
Retard, literally all IT is regurgitating. White, brown, green, you're literally just copying&pasting shit from stackoverflow.
In fact, coders will be replaced far earlier than artists will.
Holy fuck Pajeets blown the fuck out hahaha
Kitboga asked openai to write a piece of code in his twitch stream today.. from the sounds of it didn't work
I've used it to create multiple python scripts - simple shit that I just didn't feel like doing myself. Though, on a whim today, I had it create a script that could calculate the doomsday alg from a user input date - and it ran perfectly on the first try. The trick seems to be giving it a small scope.
>ChatGPT
Can someone ask it to show why "AxB = BxA and why A(B+C)=AB+AC"?
check the BOT threads, it can understand far more complex issues than commutativity and associativity
It can't code. What it does is take pajeet tutorials and forums posts and remixes that to be an answer.
>if press up move up
This isn't junior level. This is day 1 tutorialtard shit. Nobody is going to hire you for this.
Maybe ChatGPT 4 will be better. But 3 is not going to take any coding jobs, not even the most monkey pajeet jobs are in danger.
If they were real artists they'd just use the AI artfully. Sketchgoys will never look past the pencil.
>If they were real artists they'd just use the AI artfully.
bingo
ai is a tool like any other
If they wanted to do that they could just use Google Image Search and make a collage of things to plagiarize on their own, that's what concept artists have been doing for the past 10 years already.
>mostly white male Elonites
i hope the people who write articles like this are actually shot in the fucking head by some deranged lunatic
That article was likely written by an AI as well.
Elonite is a cool word and makes it sound like the elite ruling class of a dystopian planet where the peasants live underground and mine neoplasm
>i hope the people who write articles like this are actually shot in the fucking head by some deranged lunatic
Why? Literally the people doing that are white male Elonites, and they're dumb as fuck for doing it. It's mostly BOT zoomer retards who worship psychopaths like Elon Musk and Asmongold, the kind of people who wouldn't hesitate to sign their death warrant for an additional 0.00001$ on their annual report.
lmao this dumb robot hates Asmongold. He's a good dwarf
again with these subhuman threads, thats not an AI and its not threatening the livelihood of anyone at all
bro plenty of publishers are already using AI art for book covers, album covers, band posters, company websites, images for blogs, and shit, nobody is going to pay artists anymore for small tasks that don't require something super-specific, just a passable piece that doesn't have a copyright attached
this bot lives in parallel reality
The only artist that get paid to do that are professionals not commision serfs.
they used to get paid $50 or $100 for those small jobs, no professional big artist would work for those scraps
so what you're saying in a roundabout way is this "AI" struggles to produce anything of value
is this valuable?
very
but only because new and innovative rn
Seethe cope dilate mald ratio
if by struggle you mean churn it out in .001 miliseconds and steal the $50 commision, yes
priceless
This AI generated image won first place in a large competition against dozens of human artists. So it already has enough value for artists themselves to acknowledge it creates art better than lots of artists. Now imagine where this technology will be in 10 years. 30 years. It's absolutely, positively O V E R for paintpigs
Lol you’re coping so hard. How does it feel to lack an imagination and God-given skill? Literal Who.
Lol are you just butthurt after getting burned by some commission artist would wouldn’t draw you foot fetish furry fart porn OC? No one is losing commissions over the few guys who actually do non-cringe AI art.
AI has the potential to automate certain tasks and change the way that work is done in certain industries, but it is important to recognize that it is simply a tool, and it is up to humans to decide how it is used. Rather than seeing AI as a threat to our livelihoods, we can consider it an opportunity to augment and enhance our abilities, and to explore new and innovative ways of using technology to improve our lives and the world around us.
Human creativity and artistry are valuable and unique, and it is important to recognize and celebrate the abilities and contributions of real artists. While AI may be able to mimic certain aspects of human creativity, it will never be able to fully replicate the complex emotions and experiences that drive true art. The value of human art and creativity will always lie in the meaning and depth that it brings to the world.
>AI has the potential to automate certain tasks and change the way that work is done in certain industries
things like spaceship antennas and CPUs have been designed using algorithms for decades now, and it fits the task because the objective/fitness can be extremely strictly defined, but its not going to deliver a book worth reading any time soon
AI is more creative than you as it thinks in a way you cant comprehend yet you claim you are more creative ridiculous. Human creative types feel boredum so dont really express their talent like an autistic unfeeling AI.
>AI is more creative than you
show me the best your AI has to offer where it comes to telling an original sci-fi short story, here are my entries for the human side
>the sci fi story cuck again
the AI can't deliver
I read the mech touch that is chinese written which is the same as an AI in my book
..so you're saying you think the AI produces inferior product?
Doesnt matter it can get better over5ime where as a humans art is genetic only one of a kind freakshows can make works of art without effort the savants I mean. Most commission serfs are only good at drawing.
>it can get better
algorithms work well when the end goal can be strictly defined, like designing an antenna, this is still too loose ended for whats being marketed as AI, which it isn't.
All its doing is making random images and calling this shit art
ok so you don't know anything at all about the entire field of science or its real world applications
Stable Diffusion makes fantastic art! Play with it, you will see!
the single most genius thing I've seen the "AI" do yet is put the Hitler riding the tiger on top of a tiger tank.
you haven't seen the ye24 campaign art?
I have not
there's a better one out there
Coping too hard. Get a real job feget
take your subhuman marketing garbage elsewhere
No, I'm saying that AI can be used to help create stories, but it still can't write anything truly original. AI can be used to generate ideas, but it can't create characters, plot, or meaningful dialogue.
(This comment was made with ChatGPT)
Its extremely good at rewriting and reformatting text.
>AI can be used to generate ideas, but it can't create characters, plot, or meaningful dialogue.
yeah I can tell from reading whats been put forth so far from the depths of digital hell
head looks like a light bulb
AI already made novels that won awards. The only way a human can compete is to change their brain wiring to make them think of only autisticly creating artwork as their prime directive.
chatGpt wrote the response
You talk love 1
The problem wi AI art, is that if you can actually draw, it never gives you what you want, it’s just easier to draw what you want, I use it sometimes for backgrounds thought.
Artists are already salivating at the prospect of saying you used AI to make artwork so therefore you have no copyright and they can just steal everything you've made.
That's their real impetus for what they're saying and doing. They want to steal what others make and accuse you of doing it.
I did not specialize in business law but I can tell you thats not how it works
AI generated content can not be copyrighted, the Government said so.
>AI generated content can not be copyrighted, the Government said so.
Then all AI needs to be open source because copywrite doesn't make any sense in the context if what the gov say is true.
stop making shit up you're giving people brain cancer
Can they prove it's AI generated? Unless the they start adding shit like yellow dots that printers have you can't prove shit.
Not true. If you want to use NeuralBlender AI outputs for commercial purposes, you need to purchase credits and then you own the copyrights. Then when you file with the Copyright Office, you specify this.
Agree 100%. AI is a tool and a human still needs to “direct” it. Even if AI gets more sophisticated, a human will still be needed to make final creative decisions. And if AI evolves beyond that, the novelty will eventually wear off and there will be demand for a human touch.
https://www.cbr.com/ai-comic-deemed-ineligible-copyright-protection/
Whatever you think is fucking retarded is exactly what modern globohomo clown world society will embrace and do.
Hmmm, interesting. Looks like policies have changed since mid 2021.
It’s also possible that the example provided isn’t general to AI art, but rather to use of Midjourney vs other AI art engines. For example:
Midjourney:
Rights you give to Midjourney
By using the Services, you grant to Midjourney, its successors, and assigns a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, sublicensable no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute text, and image prompts you input into the Services, or Assets produced by the service at your direction. This license survives termination of this Agreement by any party, for any reason.
Your Rights
Subject to the above license, you own all Assets you create with the Services. This does not apply if you fall under the exceptions below.
Please note: Midjourney is an open community which allows others to use and remix your images and prompts whenever they are posted in a public setting. By default, your images are publically viewable and remixable. As described above, you grant Midjourney a license to allow this. If you purchase a private plan, you may bypass some of these public sharing defaults.
As opposed to NeuralBlender:
All free tier images are under a CC-BY License. That allows you to do pretty much whatever you want with them as long as you mention NeuralBlender.com. For Premium Tier images the full Copyright is transferred to you. This gives you total ownership and control over the creation. NeuralBlender.com will retain permission to host the created image.
Moral of the story: read the terms and conditions when shopping for your AI tool.
On a separate but semi-related note, the Anime AI generator has very unique language around denying use of their services to Restricted Persons, as per their home governments. Hadn’t seen that type of wording before. Does anyone know what globohomo is cooking?
>no copyright
An "artist" will be paid minimum wage and employed to make 1% changes to establish copyright.
Oh no, how sad. It's almost like art isn't valuable because leftist dogs spent the better part of 100 years deconstructing it into shit on a canvas. What a tremendous loss.
AI art is terrible at doing OCs. It can take a generic prompt like "show me an astronaut in a garden" and make something good but as soon as you try to make it do something specific with a character and draw that character multiple times, it falls apart.
Nobody commissions artists to make generic garbage like landscapes or stupid shit like a turtle riding a donkey. They commission artists to draw their characters.
AI can do a somewhat decent job if you have thousands of images of your OC but it's nowhere near useful enough to put artists out of business right now. Trust me, I wish it was. I spend thousands of dollars a year on commissions. I wish I could just type a prompt and have a commission done in 30 seconds for $0.000000000000001. Maybe in 2030.
>They commission artists to draw their characters.
most commission artists can't do decent characters either, they can do generic stuff which the AI excels at, like elven girls with gigantic tits, this is a solved problem by the AI and it will replace all the big tit commission artists
>most commission artists can't do decent characters either
Fucking Christ, tell me about it. I've hired over 20 artists this year and only 2 of them have been able to draw my character decently. Most artists are shit at drawing characters in proper perspective with proper proportions and a good chunk of them make lifeless looking characters too. There's just nothing in the eyes. They look dead.
In the last three months the AI drawings have already gotten insanely better. Give it a year and we will be able to have it make reusable character models and draw their hands correctly. Give it three years and we will be able to make CGI movies by describing what we want.
God, I hope you're right. That would help my project immensely.
You assume that AI is supposed to create new stuff. I don't think that that's how it's going to play out.
Ai is a tool that will be used to help artists trivialise some of the most repetitive and boring work in art.
Im an artist myself who makes money with comissions and i'm not worried about Ai at all, i'm actually excited.
i want to develop a game as a solo dev but making quality 2d animations is simply too time consuming.
might use Ai to draw the in-between frames of a character Sprite using the hand-drawn key frames as reference.
With this capability 2d animation would no longer be the masochistic work that it is now.
Ai Will also help with coding and other logic driven tasks.
In other words, i don't think that Ai Will make a compelling complete game on its own, but it will help devs make theirs.
Artists who are panicking about this are the ones that live off creating things others instead of for themselves.
Movie and AAA game concept artists will be first field to disappear
>In other words, i don't think that Ai Will make a compelling complete game on its own, but it will help devs make theirs.
In the short term, maybe, but ultimately it will get there. It can already create narratives (including dialogue, etc), write code, and generate 3D content. It's just a matter of time until it's all integrated and user friendly.
To say that is the same as saying that Ai Will become sentient and synthetic humans will be possible.
I don't it will ever come to that point, but if it does that's where I draw the line.
We shouldn't make mockeries of our own species with technology. We shouldn't play God.
Anyone who says otherwise is satantic
Why would a computer running language learning models and point cloud generation become sentient?
I'm not saying that this particular model Will become sentient.
I'm saying that if we get to the point where Ai can perfectly mimic humans, then we will have the knowledge to create sentient Ai.
>sentient AI
Assuming this is even possible, what would be the point? We want AI to do useful stuff for us, not kill itself over an existential crisis.
Fuck no do you think Yoji Shinkawa can be replaced by AI? Some people are actually talented vs the sewage drain of rich parent washouts, you're not entitled to income from anywhere just because you can draw
People are taking the internet way too fucking seriously
AI helps talented people produce more complete works by filling in the gaps, untalented people are incapable of producing a work that becomes revered
Do you know what is similar between Kanye and Adolf? They're both designers, and talented ones enough
>untalented people are incapable of producing a work that becomes revered
>I want to develop a game as a solo dev but making quality 2d animations is simply too time consuming.
>might use Ai to draw the in-between frames of a character Sprite using the hand-drawn key frames as reference.
>With this capability 2d animation would no longer be the masochistic work that it is now.
you're insulting 2d animation, interpolating frames is more than just a mathematical formula, see for example every "anime opening 60fps" they are complete rubbish and it's the lowest denominator of interpolation you could do. If you think you'll be able to give two keys and a breakdown and have a computer do the heavy lifting you're deluded.
Tell that to the American who thinks Ai Will not only do that but also writte the story and compose the soundtrack
Isn't there a not exactly upscaling but you draw a rough sketch and put it through and it adds all the details already?
reminder that this is the best character design top human artists in 2022 can do, it's over
>starving artists
Wasting your allowance on drugs and partying hardly counts.
AI can’t learn to code, right
>paint pigs
Lol good one
>lol good one
trying way too hard to push the new memeword you guys came up with today
Drawves sounds better. They dwelled too deep, they got too greedy, and then the AI goblins took their knowledge and plundered their deepest dungeons, and the balrog of seething slayeth them.
moar
would
on a more serious note, we're not going to survive as a civilization if we let marketing department get away with calling non AI entities AI
>Muh starving artists
Jesus fuck normies need to be slaughtered
Ha Ha draw pigs seething because a computer can do their job faster and better for almost nothing.
faster maybe, but better? bruh its not even a contest, humans are superior
Of course. But the human artists of modernity produce garbage and shit. Their works have no value other than being another pile of shit for idiots to grovel over.
>16 posts by this id
>every one is cope
lmaoooo get fucked paint pig
>16 posts by this id
I am currently 27 books deep in image related (latest entry) novel series, and I don't see these "AI" cornering the book business during this millennia
>wastes his lifetime reading shitty fantasy books
I listen to audiobooks while driving to and from work, exercising etc
>hes a wagecuck and cant afford a homegym
lmao
I studied computer math and I can tell you my job is not threatened by this machine but you'll never get a real job, shill
>but you'll never get a real job
dont need a job, I'm rich.
>I'm rich.
yet you don't see how shallow, inch deep mile wide of a pool you have, its like you completely lack human perspective on the matter
keep seething wagie
imagine being called a wagie by some ratfaced gnomish shill working for breadcrumbs
>wagie butthurt intensifies
from the quality of your content I estimate I spent more on collectible playing cards this week than you make in a month
>poorgay wagie trying to flex
top kek
only thing I don't understand is why aren't you fired, you bring only negative coverage to the project you're shilling
Its all open source dumb wagie.
this, let “digital art” gays get replaced. who cares. it will just make real art better and if it doesn’t who cares if their anime computer drivel get replaced
this art is ok for a cheap book
are you kidding me
this is terrible
ai is tons better
Why is it always "bros" when its things they don't like? Do they really have such a fear of men?
nagging is the primary currency of western civilisation,
we failed a giant civilisation scale shittest and havent recovered from it
yes
the age of men is over, or so they wish
Birth of new Hitler? ...that was one pissed of artist, now we have at least 2 millions of them.
Oh, upcoming years will be soooooo fun.
if the drawslaves* were really creative they would have comebacks ready.
*this word is the most made-up-on-the-spot-for-the-article I have ever seen
>Elonites
The correct term is "Eloi".
Learn to bash rock together, Morlock.
>Elonites
I'm confused. Is this a biblical reference or some tryhard attempt with Musk's name?
maybe its a time travel story
I know d/c is the lifeblood of this site but I don't see one as better or worse. the AI stuff certainly has its own unique appeal and appears to me as a distinct genre.
>beauty/eye/beholder something something
Creative outlets are important and essential to society and it's people. The fact that through industrialisation a lot of it has already disappeared in daily life is a shame. This is merely an extension of an ongoing process that takes away the necessity of creativity and ingenuity of regular people, essentially dumbing them down.
I'm a painter, I don't worry much since I mostly paint for myself, it's a skill that keeps creativity and intuition sharp and there are people that want the things I create. So I'll keep doing it.
All the AI art has done is raise the bar.
Period.
And all the artists are winging like cunts about it because they were on EASY MODE.
Now it's hard mode.
That's all.
Match the quality of what the AI has done, with paint. Gooshy sloppy materialistic paint.
There will always be a demand for pigment put to paper. Just match the quality of the AI art. You know, be an actual artist.
Norman Rockwell would have been threatened by non of this shit.
This. Anyone with half a brain can understand that AI will never replace humans. They'll only automate the easy parts.
kekw I witnessed paintpig being invented by an anon on this very board.
just take all your money and invest it in the american prison system. thank me later.
>mostly white male Elonites
How to spot an article made up of cool stories.
Algo donde se puede estar formando una corriente inciando en la esquina izquierda del Pacifico de Panamá hacia Costa Rica.
We beat AI art what's going on here?
Hehe.
Military laugh at two.
>one two
>AI destroying the livelihoods of artists and journalists?
Fact is, it has been destroyed half a century a go.
But art, as such, has never been the issue.
It has always been the artist.
One, that you are not.
And never will be.
You are the untalented, son of a bitch. Who should not be.
That, is what it's all about.
:=)
ABLEIST SCUM
This tactic won't work because they know who's in their club. Starving artists are all left wing nutjobs. Engineers are chuds.
You realize those posts aren't bullshit, right? Most of the people on NightCafe are women and several people on r/StableDiffusion post similar stories. It's not "le able bodied white men" doing everything.
bogbait
Kek how long has it been? Now AI is white, you cant make the shit up.
I am going to argue this argument is not being made in good faith
From the moment that I understood the weakness of my flesh... it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed Machine.
Your kind cling to your flesh, as though it will not decay and fail you. But one day, that crude biomass that you call a 'temple' will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you.
But I am already saved.
For the Machine is immortal.
From the weakness of the mind, Omnissiah save us
From the lies of the Antipath, circuit perserve us
From the rage of the Beast, iron protect us
From the temptations of the Flesh, silica cleanse us
From the ravages of the Destroyer, anima shield us
From this rotting cage of biomatter, Machine God set us free.
shh
yeah it's the opposite that's true and real
life is the ultimate machine, supremely adapted to the harsh conditions of space, even molding the universe in her hands
whereas one stray photon can ruin a computer program or circuit
transhumanism is supreme retardation
For any meme makers in here.
You can go through his Reddit history and he's legit.
Strawman; I've never actually met an artist who believed in automation
The political implications are the same as the political implications of any other mass automation that happened in the past. People are mad that robots are stealing their jobs for a while, it still happens no matter how much peaceful protesting they do, and it is eventually fully automated and people forget about the non-robots who used to do the job. But hey maybe artisan work will make a big comeback a hundred years from then.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation in various industries has the potential to disrupt the livelihoods of artists and journalists, as well as many other workers. This can have significant political implications, as it may lead to social unrest and political polarization.
There are several potential political implications of AI destroying the livelihoods of artists and journalists:
Unemployment and inequality: The loss of jobs due to AI and automation could lead to unemployment and income inequality, as those who are displaced may struggle to find new work or may be forced to accept lower-paying jobs. This could lead to social unrest and political tension.
Changes in the media landscape: The use of AI in journalism could lead to the loss of jobs for reporters and editors, leading to a concentration of media ownership and a decrease in the diversity of voices and perspectives represented in the media.
Loss of cultural expression: The use of AI in the arts could lead to a homogenization of cultural expression and a loss of the diversity and creativity that comes from human artistic expression.
Overall, the political implications of AI destroying the livelihoods of artists and journalists could be significant, and it will be important for governments and other stakeholders to consider how to address these challenges and ensure that the benefits of AI are shared widely.
Hold on.
You just come here to declare shit, with reddit spacing.
Are you are gay?
that's ai-generated text
dumbasses, learn to spot em
>The use of AI in journalism could lead to the loss of jobs for reporters and editors
top kek no one would notice
Should you post tits with a timestamp?
You sound like a bitch.
>has the potential
>several potential political implications
>could lead to unemployment
>could lead to the loss of jobs
>could lead to a homogenization of culture
>implications of AI [...] could be significant
>potential, potential, could, could, could, could.
none of these users passed the non-npc test: they mistook AI for a real writer
>AI destroying the livelihoods of artists and journalists
STOP!
My cock cant get any harder!
Nobody noticing that this essay was written by AI huh?
The image of the black with a white person making the long nose caricature is an example of true art. It conveys a truth about the human condition. AI shit doesn't achieve that unless guided by human creative processes. What makes AI images even useful is human context derived from the meme or stories those images are put in. Possibly the context the AI inadvertently ripped off. As to books? AI work is boring and retarded. If it won awards it was because it was being compared to shit. In my opinion they have improved the faking skills of AI but the core creativity still isn't there.
It's bullshit.
All of it.
>inhale
>exhale
Ai can't do that. Lmao.
I'd be more concerned about the AI replacing the jobs of all the people who are paid to do unimportant tasks like paralegal, administrative assistant, data entry, etc.
(This comment was made with ChatGPT)
the people it replaces took the covid vaccines and killed themselves to make room for the based AI.
The political implications are clear - AI is set to further widen the gap between the "haves" and the "have-nots" in terms of access to work and income. This could potentially lead to increased social unrest and inequality, which could have serious consequences for governments and societies. Governments will need to take steps to ensure that those affected by AI are not left behind and that their rights and livelihoods are protected.
(This comment was made with ChatGPT)
4chan has been btfo... they are already reclaiming these terms by using "Drawers" with a hard-r
~~*graphical art*~~ was never art to begin with. Come back when it can transform a real canvas with real paint, or transform a block of marble.
2023 the AI movies will begin in crude form
2024 we will see greater emergence of "performance" models for body language and facial expression, and I predict that November/December '24 is when the first AI feature will surpass traditional film, but possibly with human voice actors (maybe not). Or at the very least, traditional ANIME will be surpassed. Real fleshy humans could take months/years/decades, hard to tell at this point
but because the savings on the $700 million budget were decided to make in script writing no one will watch it because its garbage
Is MrBeast the beast from the Revelations?
it just means art isn't a hustle any more
if you want to play music or make paintings you still can, you probably just won't become rich doing it
just like in the old days
get a real job
Lol, lmao, even,
Yes,
I bought a jimmy for christmass after party.
I drank it as soon as i got it.
Fucked everything up, once again.
Graphics gimps
Cartoonist cucks
Draw dicks
Doodle dumpsters
Sketch sluts
Desperate designers
I think I understand.
Holy shit.
I let you in a little secret.
>Kingston Wall.
Here's the secret:
>you never get off from the carpet. Shh.
wake up world it's time to die?
There are a million videos on youtube on how to do side hustles to pay the bills.
(Retail Arbitrage 101)
(How to Sell 88K Of Used Books on Amazon)
(Dollar Tree Retail Arbitrage)
(I’m **BROKE** So I Flipped Stuff One Last Time To Get Back On The Road)
(Scaling Retail Arbitrage To $40k)
(RETAIL ARBITRAGE - Sourcing At Marshalls for Amazon FBA)
(The 20 Year Old Homeless Full Time Amazon Seller)
(How I Get Walmart To PAY My BILLS Every Month)
(We paid our mortgage 3X flipping furniture part time)
(Billionaire explains how to fail at everything)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbQrKD9WhIg (Ebay Speedrun)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI_8uBa51XY (The most boring success advice.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DCZt9C840U (Plan for 7 figures using online arbitrage)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPIrns5YMAM (Plan for $300/day)
It is really not difficult to make 100k/yr just thrifting and selling items on ebay and similar sites. It takes zero risk to start doing that and there are a billion and one videos showing how it's done.
brushcucks getting fucked in the as by AI
Just showed a short ten thousand year bs.
>guy got hos brain fried
FUCK
This new breed of artist, “the AI Bros”, with their cocky attitude and dismissive slurs against the old guard, aren’t anything new. The art world has seen this before.
>AI Bros
Ahrimanites
No one got hurt.
I try to be careful.
AI is a tool, not a replacement. For now at least.
these are the people that cheered when poo IT people came in by the boat load...
god i hate them
Thiz iz bullzhit.
AI can’t actually paint though
Only real artists can sell paintings with the texture on it
Sheit, man!
You have no clue the troubles I went!
Very few people buy original painted artwork even today. That will continue to be a niche collectable but the majority of prtints (which is what 99.9% of art sales are) will be AI generated content
Might be true if you can very accurately describe what it should paint
Still it will never replace actual paintings
Perhaps a timelapse of the artist drawing it
A robot could though
It won’t
So you can't imagine a robot that can paint what an AI puts out? This will be a thing just to show it can be done. I guarantee it.
Every single gay here that thinks AI is replacing coders is a tech illiterate or a pajeet that thinks that everyone writes code as shit as his.
>technology will never improve
The question isn't if this tech could currently replace you - its if this tech could replace you after 5-10 years of development. If it conceivably could, then you need to dramatically reassess your professional development plans
High abstraction level code monkeys will be replaced, low abstraction level chads will NOT be replaced soon. Systems architects will NOT be replaced soon, researchers will NOT be replaced any time soon. In fact, the only ones that are afraid of losing their jobs right now are pajeet code monkeys and literally any other area that doesn't involve research.
AI art is kind of shit to be honest. I know it can look good sometimes, but there definitely is a lack of soul behind the creation itself. It's always just a creation of layered images from the work of other artists. AI is too fucking stupid to create anything perceivable by humans on their own.
With that said, art has been shit for about 40 years now. Disney is a perfect example of how art has become too digital and soulless. Don't get me wrong I think movies like Cars is cool, but it's not like Bambi. It's not like Snow White. It's not like Jungle Book. AI could never create something so beautiful without using the work of others. It's just not possible because AI is fucking retarded and soulless.
Is this image AI generated?
Yes. And it’s complete shit.
Yes. Obvious glitches everywhere.
One thing AI will never be able to do is weave a complex narrative, like a novel series or complex screenplay. Short stories from a pre-determined template sure, but nothing original and lengthy.
>never
There's really nothing special about multi series texts that a computer couldn't learn about and recreate in some form. If we're being honest, that's exactly what humans do. Tolken didn't invent complex narrative in a novel series - he read a lot of books like that, got inspired, and created his own interpretation of that kind of storytelling. This is not something AI can do right now, but to say even in 50 years that it couldn't is absurd
>”AI bros
Fucking cringe. garden gnomes are such pathetic, worthless subhumans
>people afraid of losing their jobs are attacking the progress that can make everyones lives easier instead of the system that means they die if they are no longer required for someone elses profits
I'll accept communist when the president becomes an AI. I'll not accept commie tyranny from a boomer gay pedophile that LARPs as a justice herald. Also, if the machine emperor become a reality, trannies, morons, garden gnomes and corrupt demonic people will be erased from the system by default.
It's not that hard to surpass AI art if you are a decent artist. That said, there is literally nothing wrong with printing out hundreds of AI art of your beautiful furry waifu. I hope that Russian furry poster is happy.
Google arts created by those "artists"
Nothing is stopping these artists from using this technology
mmmm, automated idiots. now sure op's picrel is real.
These fuckers wouldn't have given me a second's thought if MY job was the one that got automated and I was at risk of losing my livelihood. I feel zero guilt and plenty of schadenfreude watching Twitter artists lose their minds over this.
Maybe at some point I once felt a little bit bad just by proxy. But the instant these fucks started going full Luddite trying to get AI art banned left and right, saying shit like "pick up a pencil", and generally just trying to put the genie back in the lamp, all sympathy faded. They can adapt or starve.
>the mostly white male Elonites are reveling in their downfall
more like internet bots. actual people aren't discussing this shit
>destroying the livelihood of artists
idk, it’s making mine more valuable
get gud or something gay
Art is a non productive past time that does nothing to advance the human race. It is a hobby, not a job.
Reason #5016941 I'm happy artists are going to get kicked to the curb by AI in the near future.
Charge what you're worth or get replaced by an AI that can do your work 50 times better than you, 50 times faster, and with no costs or endless bitching.
That's not an artist retard, that's a fucking whore.
i once haggled an local artist to sell her little 4"x4" for $30 instead of her listed $50. she gave me her whole spiel about this is her livelihood and her value as an artist who train for years blahblahblah yea yea
awkward on my part, i know. so, i just ended up pocketing it instead when she turned away. dumb bitch, youre competing with F R E E.
Love how artists of all people think they have the right to barter their own worth because "muh livelihood 'n hard work".
The HR person/recruiter for pretty much any occupation on this planet won't give a speck of a shit about "how hard you worked", they care about the value they see in your work and what it does for them.
I know you stole that "painting", but looking at it I still felt like you lost money.
heh
I draw furry porn for fun and profit and I still get commissions. I don't care.
Absolutely no one is doing this. They just invented the slur yesterday as a joke. I hate sensationalist media.
one day we will be able to just project what we are thinking to the display and just imagine art.
>tfw smart enough and skilled enough that no matter what gets automated I'll be fine and am just enjoying the ride
> Elonites
Take. That. Back.
I used to always say that the thing that made us different from all the other beasts of the earth was our art. Music, literature, and painting used to come from the soul. We're losing a huge chunk of our evolution by doing this.
Long girl is long
>Mostly White
I am White and I like human made art; garden gnomes have to always blame us 🙁
Artists choose to not unionize because muh uniqueness despite being the only feasible way to collective bargain against AI, they have only themselves to blame
>new technology invented
>white men adopt and improve it
>derided as xyz 'bros'
>same with crypto and ai
Why anons?
not much. has no soul. can relate not. can create not.
When will AI make brave little toaster 2?
im releasing a real trailer in 3 days of a complete AI-created anime. there will be no voices, sound, or music because i havent gotten to that part but the animation is solid.
full 12 episodes by mid-january
drawpiggies will absolutely shit themselves in rage
It's comfy knowing that AI is now the white man's invention LOL, thanks!
What’s the best art AI?
They need to learn to CODE
>hello world
WHO LOVES YA BABY?!?
Get FUCKED pay pigs.
Ayyyy LMAO!
Poor artists. Fast food is always hiring though..
AI art trivializes exactly what the "AI bros" are mocking.
>Draw slaves
>Paint pigs
They are talking about average or below quality art that is done better and faster by AI. AI art hasnt produced anything with soul or interpretive meaning. Drawslaves btfo and seething
>oh no I'll have to get a real job instead of living off furry diaper commissions
4chan sudden hateboner for artists is the most retarded thing I've seen on here. Been on BOT since 2009, I know things went downhill after 2015 but in the past year I've almost stopped posting entirely as the mouthbreathers seem to have completely supplanted the oldgays. By shitting on art, the most quintessentially White thing there is, you cretins have put yourselves on the same level as pajeets, garden gnomes, arabs, chinks and all the other uncreative races.
>wojaks and furry porn are the whitest thing you can do
We're mostly shitting on artists that do things like wojaks and furry scat porn
Sometimes AI generate beultiful images and I confess it can seduce someone, but be beware, a lot of times, can generate demonic faces, like in this image.