WE NEED TO BAN AI ART RIGHT NOW !! Posted on May 2, 2023 by Anonymous WE NEED TO BAN AI ART RIGHT NOW !!
I'm too much of a dumbfuck to use math so please ban math
If they're worried about these fictional drawings I can just generate one with a speech bubble saying "I consent". As if the people whining are going to see it anyway on my own machine.
Isn't this another word for telling poorgays who're poor because of their own stupid decisions "you're poor because of your own stupid decisions"?
This is reverse classism actually since it gives the power to draw to everyone, not just a handful few
>too poor to affort a good gpu
>can't generate shit
>elon musk generates a shitton of everything and gets programmers to improve on new models
>those new models never get leaked or get publicly accessible without restrictions/costs
Anon you are RETARDED
AI gives less power to everyone than fucking just foss
We've already seen hobbyists and academic students lower the bar of entry dramatically in terms of hardware requirements. I doubt that trend is going to stop considering demand.
Compressing models decreases its quality. LLaMA model trained on GPT3.5 is much dumber then GPT3.5. Most you can hope for is better Hardware being available to the masses
Oh fuck off it's not that money to buy a computer capable of running Stable Diffusion.
In this context the gay is probably upset that the powers of being apart of bourgeoisie intelligensia (ie artists) ie artificial scarcity and gaygy shit like DMCA laws are being eroded and is throwing a temper tantrum. If you ever been within a mile of an online """""""""""""""""""""""""artist community"""""""""""""""""""""""""" then you know what I mean.
No. That's what the rich want you to believe because it keeps you cooperative.
>there's a way to stop being poor
>anyone can do it
>most people just don't because they're not good enough
>you could stop being poor
The day you decide not to buy Starbucks, eat out or whatever, you're gonna find out that you're still not on the same level as somebody who was born rich. Feel free to make only good decisions for the next 30 years, and when you find yourself still being poor, imagine me saying I told you so.
t. avocado toast purchaser
>Feel free to make decisions only a low IQ person would think are good for the next 30 years, and when you find yourself still being poor-
lmfao this pathetic poorgay thinks its not his fault
Reminder that the IQ of individuals are significantly better than the socio-economic status of their parents at predicting whether they avoid living in poverty later in life
Yeah, i grew up poor as fuck and I am relatively well off compared to anyone else in my family since I went to university and got a good job
Yeah but usually your IQ will be similar to the parents and thus your social-econ too because generally poor people are stupid. People are where they belong and if you are actually smart you'd find some upwards mobility, atleast to middle class
you're such a based freethinker anon
huh? youre too lazy too into a skill. reverse classism makes absolutely no sense in this context. you must be 18 to post here
Personally I think that it's good that they made an infinite naked children generator. Takes people out of the equation. Genius technology.
It still doesn't generate good enough anime e-bois though, so they need to keep working on it.
the greatest tragedy of all is the white liberal masses making the issue into something hyper politcal and making artists look worse.
I fucking hate these white people
I see no problem in any of that
stop censoring twittards usernames, this isn't reddit
you can't expect twitter artists to be sane that's where their drive comes from. it's just like that. now sage and hide because twitter screenshot thread
>AI has empowered classism
>even though only those of a stable financial background had any reasonable chance of producing art
>the people pushing for AI deceleration are the ones in power
Incredible how these people can’t even see the cognitive dissonance
>even though only those of a stable financial background had any reasonable chance of producing art
lmao do you retards actually think this? even digitally drawing is extremely accessible for poor thirdies.
yeah fuck these twitter knobs but also it seems that a lot of people who are commenting on this specific issue here are using the words art and artist in the context of a small subset of it related to digital mediums. of course, even doing that is accessible like youve mentioned, but picking up a pencil and paper is one of the cheapest forms of entertainment one could possibly hope for. who the fuck are these people? this place has been overrun with fried fucking normies
Ableist too. Are the handless not entitled to create artworks just because they can't draw?
AI morons have tried using that argument before and they get chewed by actually crippled artists that don't need generative AI. Not having arms is not an excuse.
>they don't need it so why would anyone else?
I fail to see your argument.
Nobody who wants to make art needs it. Only people who want to cheap out or scam people want it.
I fail to see what's wrong with cheaping out. Especially when the alternative is to pay someone else to make what you personally want. Maybe you like enslaving artists, but I'd rather command a machine around instead.
I see it as not being very different from piracy. You take someone's effort and use it for free.
"lol" is not an argument.
As you pointed out it takes effort for humans to produce art. Usually a lot of time, focus, and dedication to a particular work. Machines can do the same thing in minutes and don't take time away from even yourself let alone say a week+ of another human being's life.
You can try to minimizing it with laughter but that won't negate the point. You're paying for their time when you could easily avoid being selfish and just have a machine do it while humans live their lives doing what they want rather than what you want them to do.
Maybe your job is a tedious chore and you would love to get replaced, but people who make art or music went into it because that's what they're passionate about. Nobody does it because they want money. Money is incidental. If you take their jobs away what are they supposed to do? Thank the machine that saved them and become regular wagecucks that hate their job?
>Nobody does it because they want money
Pretty much every artists I've ever spoken to has told me they only do furry porn for money. It's often deranged stuff like scat as well.
Considering your previous posts and this one, I get the impression you're going to continue a trend of being dishonest to ignore the fact that you're buying someone.
Acting as if it's funny, and acting as if because some exceptions get paid to do what they want, that all artists must be that way.
Pretending that there aren't people out there debasing themselves for the benefit of the buyer for hours each day.
I guess child labor is okay because they get paid. I guess falling to prostitution is okay because you can enjoy it sometimes.
It's okay to commission someone for gay scat art as long as you pay them enough while they're in desperate need. Right? They can just decline so no harm ha ha. lol.
I don't have a sister.
I miss 2016
i miss 2006
>It's often deranged stuff like scat as well.
Arguably the stuff this thread is about is worse.
Kind of strange seeing someone argue in favor of commissioning CP.
>Money is incidental.
>If you take their jobs away what are they supposed to do?
What's the problem then? Just let AIgays do their thing and stop complaining.
It's not even real art, so why does it matter?
Ah yeah, there's the crux. It fucks with your ability to make money. Which is all you give a shit about.
>WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE FREEDOM TO MAKE ART FOR FREE WHEN I WANT MONEY?
Every single one of you cocksuckers is a sociopath and if you get your way we'll get absolutely draconian laws to "limit" "AI". Mark my words.
Have you met actual artists? Most of them are poor gays and most likely disabled. I have known an artist that literally had no forearms and just had single bone per arm with 3 fingers on one and 5 fingers on the other. Half blind people fucking draw. Most of them are also mentally ill retards. Art was actually amazing way for the dregs of society to make money from furry commissions, but now they have to be fed by the state even more.
garbage posts not going to read
working class people are too busy working to produce art
>someone just posted cp and mods are doing nothing
>post pic of a CLOTHED girl
why are plebbitors like this ?
I mean, there are threads with OPs pic being a e-boi receiving the dick and a e-boi dicky, and i downloaded both btw
What the hell is "DF Pornography"? The words that come out of a twitter user are like gravel in a blender holy fuck
I don't even know what that is bitch
ah so you're just a right-click retard
>gatekeeping proompting as if it's a skillful endeavor
why would i give him the entire rundown on what SD is when he didnt ask for it you dumbass
That's not what gatekeeping means you sickeningly disturbingly retarded fucking morongay have a nice day?
this man has low standards for ai art or is posturing so hard his head's on the floor
Disabled Furries obviously
Like fox man on wheelchair fucking dwarf down syndrome wolf shemale
Oh, I see you're a man of proompting culture too.
consent was inexistent to the millions of innocents that had to pay high taxes for these same gays to live elite lifes
get fucked chud moron
I hope you suffer
I love how CP and plagiarism are considered equal crimes by this user.
he doesn't want anyone else stealing his Captain Picard images and claiming credit for them
>I love how CP and plagiarism are considered equal crimes by this user.
>CP is a crime
>Changing bits on your drive is a horrible crime
Digital art is not art
Ah, so this is how leftist groups are going to extort money from AI companies
>Erosion of art and culture
get a load of this right-wing-extremist. I don't think BOT should be complicit in spreading neo nazi talking points
Their tears are delicious.
>It's empowering muh misogyny nooooo!
Imagine trying to ban software. Good luck with that.
it learned all of that from humans.. ban humans to save the humans.
skynet was right
>download stable diffusion
>download some models trained on my favorite artists
>click unplug internet
AI art is our LAST CHANCE to make people realize that the internet is not real life. If computer-generated images/video/speech indistinguishable from the real thing at their very own fingertips doesn't do it, nothing will. It's over.
I just don't understand how ai art is "freeing" like how most people were saying some months ago. You're just clicking a button after typing some prompts out and making an image from someone else's art style. Although at least the actual artist can draw hands.
This seems like someone who is for AI but they're pretending to be retarded to try to poison anti-AI arguments.
this is how communists feel about capitalism
how feminists feel about patriarchy
how christians feel about lucifer
all it says is who's tribe you're in, and nothing more
The faster Ai accelerates, the faster I can have my Scarlett Johansson AI girlfriend.
I say speed it up. Pedal to the metal.
maybe this is my Stallman moment, but why are mayos fuming about generated CP anyway? If you don't want to decommission the pedophiles, then surely allowing them a way to cum without harming a real person is ideal, right?
I'll never defend retards who want to punish thought crimes but a very valid argument against AI CP is that it makes it difficult to prosecute the real deal as many man hours could be spent chasing a case that doesn't exist
It just seems so ridiculous, though, when there's so much unverifiable porn already - loads of underage-looking people on xvideos and other mainstream sites.
Also, while I recognize we're still in the relatively early stages of these models, while they do a great job at mimicking faces and scenery, upon closer inspection, even when fingers and things aren't fucked beyond belief, there are loads of giveaways in terms of lighting, weird artifacts (or lack thereof), etc.
IMO, wasted resources seems like stretch currently.
People should start arguing that making fun of AI that AI generated images with fucked up fingers is demeaning to people with genetic birth defects. If they haven't already.
>I don't mind you criticizing the flaws in AI art and you're right to express your opinion. But please be mindful of the negative implications of making fun of these images. Some people have very different kinds of hands than you or me due to genetics or surgery. These kinds of comments affect their self-esteem and mental health. They are all valid and beautiful. Don't let AI divide us. We can't misdirect our hate.
Sure but I don't even think cp is produced any more from what I've seen people say on here all the cp that's made now is girls doing live streams and "raping themselves' so there's isn't a victim
AI is released to everyone and there are little or no restrictions on how it can be used.
The "commoners" are using AI for things we deem bad.
AI must be regulated and restricted in use to a select few corporations that are part of the satanic pedophile cabal.
>AI is released to everyone and there are little or no restrictions on how it can be used.
I don't see how that's a problem.
People are using it to simulate crimes
I simulate a crime every time I masturbate to Emma Watson in the first Harry Potter film, COME AT ME, THOUGHT POLICE!
Then maybe you should simulate arresting them.
The problem is you just need 1 mental illness to shit up the whole thing for everyone
I didn't consent to being born.
pavarotti's nessun dorma sucks, it doesn't fit the words at all, jonas kaufmann's interpretation is far better
More like "my boss told me they are training AI on the company's art". Why do artists always feel so entitled to art they produce at the request of someone else for money? No other job has people with such an ego
I don't understand how anyone can shill for more copyright when big companies are the ones who hold most of IP, it's not like they'll distribute royalties to random deviantart gays.
This Jon guy is one of the best sources of artists seethe on twitter. What an absolute detestable gay
Deepfake? Nah that shit is gross and soulless af. I can't fathom there are people who get hard to that uncanny valley tier stuff. It's like fapping to a drawing with a photo plastered to it.
I remember looking up deepfake porn when it was a big deal and being able to instantly recognize the porn stars by their bodies but not being able to figure out whose face was plastered on it. Seems like meme tech to me.
i think ai art is bullshit, i just wanted to shill a singer i like
but since you asked here you go https://www.midjourney.com/showcase/recent/
very obvious ai art. the buildings are literally nonsensical lmao.
>i-its supposed to be abstract
it's definitely better than hitler's painting of neuschwanstein
has any one studied if hitler would have approved of a.i.? i need to know if anti-ai can be called hitler or if pro-ai is hitler.
Nazis loved high tech stuff.
AI can be used to increase productivity while increasing standards of living for workers. This is a win win
>Fucked up molten windows that look like ancient native american handwriting
>Rooftops that bend over in impossible angles
>Rooftops that dont even make sense and make is difficult to see how many houses there are
>Rooftops that dont even look like rooftops, just random red shapes
>Asymetrical central tower
>Asymetrical side tower
Was this made with early models? Like with the first SD or Midjourney V2 or something?
if the ai didn't consent it wouldnt generate the images
Lefties are getting mad at pixels while the politicians they voted for are raping kids.
obvious AI. post this on twitter claiming to have made it and watch as you get called out for it being AI
>those houses in the background with nonsensical proportions
Way too obvious
yup its AI
theres not an artist in the world that uses that small of a canvas for that kind of work. have a nice day
>everyone always posts everything at full res
>nobody ever downloads/shares thumbnails
>everyone always posts everything at full res
if you're an artist you do, retard.
>nobody ever hides hires behind a paywall
Go ahead, try and pass it off as your own on twitter and start a career off it retards
I'm not moving any goalposts. Why do I have to argue every point in a chain of posts?
If you can't start a career with AI art, then why do artists think it's a problem?
you are literally the one that moved the goalpost
why would something being saved/shared at a low resolution ever mean that its ai art?
>the artist would post their own art at thumbnail resolution
Artists can paint on a high resolution canvas, but that doesn't mean they always paint details at those resolutions.
the hands are an obvious giveaway. also in ai anime art the eyes and hair always have the exact same, generic style. prove me wrong.
I'm impressed. Can you share your art for comparison? Since you're good at identifying it, you must draw a lot.
i used to draw a lot but since i was shamefully bad i stopped. idk what is so impressive about it, i guess i somewhat know what to look for. the hand in her lap has a weirdly large index finger and the other hand has a detatched finger that shades into the rock. usually you want to avoid different objects looking too similar/ sharing outlines when they're overlapping, it seems that the ai used for this image hasn't been trained with this concept in mind. the eyes and hair thing is just a pattern i picked up on, idk how to put it into words.
You should pick up drawing again. It takes practice.
there are many things i should pick up again, but i don't have the time and patience anymore. oh well.
Now you know why AI art exists for 99.5% of people
along with everything else AI will simplify
i am aware, i'm also not against ai art. my sole point was that, at this point in time, there are still many obvious landmarks in ai art that make it obvious as such.
Keep in mind like 6 years ago AI images was warped twisted dog monstrosities and strange purple swirls. This is the progress made in that time. Imagine 6 more years in the future.
Not only that, that image was generated on a home computer by a user using an offline version of an out of date program.
>computer generated CP = bad
>giving 7yos medical procedures that permanently fuck their physiology to satisfy the parent's fetish = good
Why are you anti-semitic?
AI should be banned and it's proponents should be killed.
Anon is upset that ChatGPT has a better grasp on English grammar
you cant ban it anymore, its open source , that mean the code how its made and how to use it is free and in every corner of the internet and on millions of pc too. you need to ban and censor millions of private devices at the same time all over the world. Pandoras box is open man.
>You can't ban it anymore because... open source!
Ban research, ban the repositories that host it, ban products or processes that use it, ban the repositories, ban people who discuss and set up a enforcement regime to minimize the spread of AI.
This would just be the start, we need a whole regime that is focused on being critical of technology, no different from environmentalism.
environmentalism is retarded and only served to kill alternative technologies for the benefit of the fossil fuel industries
please kill you'reself and help save our planet
>Deliberately missing the point
You are a shill.
I'm not that anon, but I'm not sure you made a point at all. You've claimed ai should be banned and the people who use it should be banned and we need to be critical of technology. Why?
The only ones who support AI are AIs themselves. All actual humans have realized its dangers and want it destroyed.
with current retarded state of law AI is dangerous because retards don't understand how easy it is to generate ai pedo stuff and send someone to jail
We just need to ban pornography. Ai art can stay.
lmao commies are so funny, I love all the silly words they come up with
if people generating art turns you into a poorgay then you deserve to be homeless
How. Most pajeets prooompters worship women
Yea they worship women in naked form.
i hope all these instawhores are turned into pornstars for coomers,cant wait to see them seethe moar
Wait until they realize what happens in people's imaginations
Wait when did AI do all that??
It runs on my puter offline, I hope it gets regulated so normalgays will stop using and corporations will get better at controlling them
>ai models infringing on copyright is literally rape and as bad as sexually abusing a minor for profit
i am okay with them claiming this because it is legitimately unhinged.
i welcome the next wave of mental derangement from the replaceable seat warmer useless eater class.
i didn't consent to having to hear this deranged opinion from a mentally deformed emotionally stunted serf.
i cant wait for them to eat the bugs and live in a pod own nothing and stop procreating. this is the kind of eugenics i have been waiting for.
you kind of did by coming here
yeah and that middleschooler should not have looked so sexy she wouldn't have gotten mollested in the public school bathroom
>i didn't consent
You literally did.
what kind of asshole blurbe the name
>AI gays accidentally admit to being BBC cuck fetishists
I love generative AI now
Painters in North Korea are losing their jobs in making propaganda posters, because the state's AI is now doing it instead.
>firs they laugh at you
>then they are against you (we are here)
>then they fear you
>then the accept you
>CONSENT is being eradicated
This stupid bitch gave up his consent when he accepted the terms and conditions of the sites he uploaded pictures of himself to.
He has literally embraced big tech companies.
Those sites can do literally anything they want with his image.
Now he's crying about it?
yes please ban it, I already have a local version running that I will use to generate images and sell them after the ban for lots of money.
seriously though, how do they expect a ban to even happen? OK AI art is now banned, this art I created was totally not made using AI I promise, like how would you even know?