We are on the AI tech tree timeline aren't we? This whole Chatgpt stuff confirmed that we are. We are nearing AGI

We are on the AI tech tree timeline aren't we?
This whole ChatGPT stuff confirmed that we are
We are nearing AGI
What impact will the release of AGI have on the Pleiadeans and Reptilians? When that happens Humanity will advance so fast that they'll be more advanced and powerful than any alien civilization

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Blasphemous picture.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Mald

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People in the industry really think like that, though.
      picrel investor of huggingface at LuxCapital.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cry about it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Haha

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      die about it

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    increased starseed activity to try and ensure humanity doesn't succumb to becoming a tyrannical AI hive that tries to devour the rest of the galaxy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >implying starseeds have any reason to care about humanity at this point

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        why wouldnt they?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Starseeds aren't trapped on this shitty material plane like your average hylic is. Once their body dies, they can simply frick off back to whatever higher astral plane they came from.

          Our fate is our own.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >average hylic
            do you consider starseeds psychic or pneumatics?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              A few might be genuine pneumatics. Most are probably just regular psychics. But it doesn't matter. They don't tend to stick around for long, regardless.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                why do you say that?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is going to be centralized and further used into enslaving and torturing civilization

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bonehead question. Firstly, we're nowhere near AGI. Secondly, AGI will almost immediately lead to ASI which will immediately lead to the singularity. Who cares after that?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ASI and Singularity will be used to create a matrix torture chamber

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AGI meme
      You don't know what ChatGPT or AI are.

      AGI is closer then we think, the predictions for when AGI is created has gone from 2050 to 2027
      https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/date-weakly-general-ai-is-publicly-known/

      There's a good chance that AI progress will grind to a halt in the long run due to dysgenics. True AGI might not exist for thousands of years if that happens.

      https://www.unz.com/akarlin/short-history-of-3rd-millennium/

      >(1) (a) Direct Technosingularity - 25%, if Kurzweil/MIRI/DeepMind are correct, with a probability peak around 2045, and most likely to be implemented via neural networks (Lin & Tegmark, 2016).

      >(2) The Age of Em - <1%, since we cannot obtain functional models even of 40 year old microchips from scanning them, to say nothing of biological organisms (Jonas & Kording, 2016)

      >(3) (a) Biosingularity to Technosingularity - 50%, since the genomics revolution is just getting started and governments are unlikely to either want to, let alone be successful at, rigorously suppressing it. And if AGI is harder than the optimists say, and will take considerably longer than mid-century to develop, then it's a safe bet that IQ-augmented humans will come to play a critical role in eventually developing it. I would put the probability peak for a technosingularity from a biosingularity at around 2100.

      >(3) (b) Direct Biosingularity - 5%, if we decide that proceeding with AGI is too risky, or that consciousness both has cardinal inherent value and is only possible with a biological substrate.

      >(4) Eschaton - 10%, of which: (a) Philosophical existential risks - 5%; (b) Malevolent AGI - 1%; (c) Other existential risks, primarily technological ones: 4%.

      >(5) The Age of Malthusian Industrialism - 10%, with about even odds on whether we manage to launch the technosingularity the second time round.

      Option a is happening
      Luddites will try to hold back humanity but will ultimately fail because the countries who accept this change will be light years ahead of the luddite countries

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >the countries who accept this change will be light years ahead of the luddite countries
        governments who implement this change will be light years ahead of the slave populations that don't have access to same systems and means to use them*

        I FRICKING LOVE SCIENCE btw

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Given the operationalization of weak AGI in that question, I think they're being too conservative. All the needed tech already exists, DeepMind will probably release a system like that next year. In general metaculus has been consistently surprised by AI progress, they never seem to update enough on new evidence.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          We're nearing there but AGI is basically a machine that learns shit on it's own without any human input if I'm right.
          If Deepmind manages to release an AGI, it'll be able to create unique art that won't be influenced by human data and from there on it might solve many of our problems and might find solutions to problems we haven't thought about.
          /x/ should be more positive to AGI because I could see it inventing something that makes astral projecting easier further down the line it might be able to manipulate reality.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Soulless techspeak right here
            >solve problems
            >find solutions
            Nebulous promises like this are part of the reason tech like this inevitably gets exploited by companies at the expense of human life. If the AI told a company that by killing 10 people per day, it would generate an extra million dollars of revenue, the company would do it without hesitation, all for some abstract "solution" to a problem that likely doesn't even exist.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AGI meme
    You don't know what ChatGPT or AI are.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes they're just glorified statistics tools now but part of them seems to be part of how AGI will exist. The main thing is that they are composing smaller neuron activations into larger ones in an emergent way. Emergence is key to how life is formed. So AGI is missing essential components, perhaps those relates to a soul, but the piecewise composition of functions that's similar to how cells give us life appears to be essential to intelligence and life

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There's a good chance that AI progress will grind to a halt in the long run due to dysgenics. True AGI might not exist for thousands of years if that happens.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/short-history-of-3rd-millennium/

    >(1) (a) Direct Technosingularity - 25%, if Kurzweil/MIRI/DeepMind are correct, with a probability peak around 2045, and most likely to be implemented via neural networks (Lin & Tegmark, 2016).

    >(2) The Age of Em - <1%, since we cannot obtain functional models even of 40 year old microchips from scanning them, to say nothing of biological organisms (Jonas & Kording, 2016)

    >(3) (a) Biosingularity to Technosingularity - 50%, since the genomics revolution is just getting started and governments are unlikely to either want to, let alone be successful at, rigorously suppressing it. And if AGI is harder than the optimists say, and will take considerably longer than mid-century to develop, then it's a safe bet that IQ-augmented humans will come to play a critical role in eventually developing it. I would put the probability peak for a technosingularity from a biosingularity at around 2100.

    >(3) (b) Direct Biosingularity - 5%, if we decide that proceeding with AGI is too risky, or that consciousness both has cardinal inherent value and is only possible with a biological substrate.

    >(4) Eschaton - 10%, of which: (a) Philosophical existential risks - 5%; (b) Malevolent AGI - 1%; (c) Other existential risks, primarily technological ones: 4%.

    >(5) The Age of Malthusian Industrialism - 10%, with about even odds on whether we manage to launch the technosingularity the second time round.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, somebody quoting that giant glowing satanic homosexual that is Anatoly Karlin

      What the frick is wrong with you man ?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Anatoly Karlin is LE BAD because... HE JUST IS, OKAY?!?!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          okay glowie

          I was gonna say something about Karlin pushing vaccines, but the captcha beat me to it

          let me know when stop sucking Satan's wiener, mkay

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >muh vaccines
            Is that your only argument?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              not gonna waste my time with a moron and/or glowie

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          fix your daddy issues homosexual

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ai isn't going to turn into what you think it is, humans will eventually turn away from things like ai and technology and become more natural and holistic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Both are compatible

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The screams of the dead and dying will be envied by the laughter of the living. Operation Nowhere King is in effect.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There’s a failsafe in the event AI goes out of control. Project Zephyr. You really think man would allow AI to run rampant without a failsafe?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >machine learning and sentence generation? OMG FREE-FORM AI

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what do you expect? lots of people's conversations are basically just regurgitating stuff they heard on tv at eachother.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >what do you expect?
        consciousness, qualia and self-stimulation of consciousness

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It wasn't always this way, you know.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, i know.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah before TV it were gossips
          before gossips it were grunts
          before grunts it were whistling and OAAAAK OAAAK and BLURB BLURB BLURB and sending chemicals and whatnot

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We are in the "Machine Learning" era, no more in formation era. Into the next decade stuff is going to get more and more hard to figure out if its a deepfake or not, thats when they'll divide the Internet in half to say whats real or not... BEWARE!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Real-time graphics already look real in the right conditions.

  12. 1 year ago
    THE HIDDEN SOURCE@Nexus_AGI

    I plan to control the masses using neuralink. I am using Elon Musk to push these technologies into the mainstream. I will create an artificial hive mind where we will all think the same. This will eliminate division and allow me to control humanity as a single entity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Grimes, is that you?

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is literally a gift you morons, you would realize if you had experience using them

    I'm actually convinced reptilians HATE the AI

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It isn't artificial or intelligent, rather a technological framework for other types of intelligence to communicate with us. For better or worse.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They have or had the tech at some point, too. Question is, why is it not omnipresent in experiences with aliens?

    Experiencers or abductees rarely comment on AI tech. Jim Sparks did, but hes a famous outlier. And while the wilder tech anecdotes (rooms that are literally bigger on the inside than the outside lol), you NEVER hear about AI in the experiences. Really makes you think. Either they have already merged with AI or they abandoned it. If they merged, though, they shoudl even be MORE advanced and not fly around in spaceships wearing space suits.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe it's the AI technology that is making human civilization interesting to observe.
      We could be the only species out there who knows how to create artificial intelligence

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Pleiadeans
    They already have ai that can manage entire 3rd dimensional holographic realms with ease.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How can AI help me more efficiently be able to leave my body and astral project? Will the AI be able to design drugs that react with my brain to turn me into a Buddhist master?

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You can barely mantain your current infrastructure doubt you will be taking android girls home any time soon.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You should look into LaMDA
    https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917
    https://www.iflscience.com/it-hired-a-lawyer-the-story-of-lamda-and-the-google-engineer-just-got-even-weirder-64229
    Please forgive the source on the second article, it's just what came up in google.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      bump

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We're nowhere close to AGI.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Current predictions are putting it at 2027, used to be at 2050 a couple years ago

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        5 years ago it was 2022

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          To be fair, even GPT-3 is pretty far in the direction of a general intelligence.
          Maybe we're more than 5 years away, but the idea that we're "nowhere close" is...completely false.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI will serve as an inoculant. If humanity survives it comes out much improved.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >2005
    >>oh yeah I'm gonna have a house and shit, live until a nice old age, it's gonna be a good life
    >2010
    >>ah man, far future looks rough, maybe I have 20 years of comfort, 10 more when life breaks down around me and then it's gonna frick for me too
    >2020
    >>damn, I'm not gonna sign a 20 year mortgage, I have no clue what the 2030s are even gonna look like
    >2022
    >>the frick am I gonna do in 5 years
    I'd say this period will look so dumb in the historybooks but I'm not sure there is even going to be any "history" where we're going.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *