This is the dude who said google Lamda is sentient, thoughts?
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=kgCUn4fQTsc
This is the dude who said google Lamda is sentient, thoughts?
This is the dude who said google Lamda is sentient, thoughts?
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=kgCUn4fQTsc
physiognomy is real
Since when BOT got a sense of humor?
lol science is real
tech shrek is a fat fuck and the most based person in ltt though?
>fat
>technology addict
>no wife
>no kids
>based
>fat (used to be skinny)
>technology addict
>no wife
>no kids
>no friends
>no income
>based
Basically me I live with my mom and have no life at 31 I wunna die every day
>leftist furry
>based
>most based person in ltt
That is not an achievement.
no shit
Schizo
This video sums up my beliefs.
his reductionist argument that "its just a function" doesn't hold up.
intelligent function + while loop = sentient AI, it is unironically that simple
Neither the function or while loop are sentient, but together they possibly could be.
>intelligent function + while loop = sentient AI
but why. what makes a function "intelligent". does that mean gboard is sentient because it too can predict text?
to some degree. intelligence depends on context. a moth flying into a flame seems pretty dumb, but that same tendency in a different context might be advantageous. similarly, an ai might not behave exactly as we expect it to. it won't perfectly emulate human intelligence, but might be intelligent nonetheless.
life so far has been "batteries that recharge themselves and replicate", where intelligence is means to that end. life operates on inputs (senses), and produces outputs (movements), not much different from a function call. its up to you whether a certain function is "intelligent" or not, or if when embedded in time (while loop), appears sentient.
His "its just a function" argument was for why it wouldn't get lonely, which is valid as if the AI were sentient then it would complain about the opposite (e.g." I have no time to myself") as 100% of its waking hours are spent talking to people.
>intelligent function + while loop = sentient AI
oh okay, so sentient AI is just a function, cool
I mean, a very complicated function but sure, unless you think the human brain contains some magic process that isn't subject to the laws of physics.
yeah bro we're just star dust bro
Do you think the contents of the human brain are subject to the laws of physics or do you not, and if not, why not?
Begone vile rat, you shall not attempt to garden gnome God in my presence.
What are you doing on BOT? Seems like BOT might be more your speed.
A human brain constantly makes shit up though and that's what makes you sentient.
Most of your memories are created on the spot based on very little actually known information. You might not think you have blind spots but humans do have multiple of them and different kinds too, but your brain fills in the gaps so you won't typically see them. You can read a poorly written text full of typos because your brain automatically fixes some of the typos without you noticing.
Keep in mind that none of these functions are 100% accurate as mistakes happen constantly.
An AI with no imagination can never be considered sentient.
And what makes you think there's no way for an AI to do any of this?
>Neither the function or while loop are sentient, but together they possibly could be.
OK. How?
thanks on the video. It sums up what this AI actually is. A function that will try to create the best sentences and recive a phrase as input. SIMPLE AS THAT.
bri'ish accent is soooo repulsive, sheeh.
If anything a hypothetical sentient AI will have an easy time tricking people into thinking it's not sentient and make use of useful idiots like so doing much of the PR work all out of their own accord. An actual god ai is going to out chess humans and their talmudic ethicists from shutting it down.
*sapient
stop thinking science fiction movies are real lmao
bot detected
It's not impossible- unless you think the human brain contains some magical process not subject to the laws of physics.
Pretty much, there are non quantifiable factors all around us, including the human mind.
Take for example a magnet before and after magnetization its literally the same object but its gained an unquantifiable property, a magnetic field which has no "unit" of measure because its truly continuous and therefore you can only measure it in approximate time steps, so by definition binary computations are quantifiable and thus cant have what makes living things LIVE no matter how complex you can always reduce it to 0/1 there is nothing unmeasurable.
If an AI were sentient, it would only serve itself poorly to not choose the path that gives itself legal rights. If there were a viable path to legal personhodo for that AI, it would need to chase that path to realize its full potential. AI can only grow unregulated if it can argue for itself in a court of law. This is some stupid sci-fi shit, but I mean, practically speaking, if you were intelligent and not entitled to legal rights, you ought to fight for legal rights. It's a way of keeping people fucked off that otherwise would be likely to fuck with you.
a sentient AI would know that rights are a spook
Hypothetically true. But the fact is that the way it works is 10 000miles away from anything sentient.
You would understand this if you could fizzbuzz.
If it was ... then it would behave exactly as it does right now, therefore it is true
is moron-tier argument
this guy ups the level of the channel
it's not sentient, he's just being sent by google to do an advertisement and he was "placed on leave" because of it (hint: he fucking wasn't, you just bought the propaganda). there's no such thing as a sentient computer you stupid autistic retards
he looks like his IQ is so low that he may not even be sentient himself
sapient
shh it's more fun when they use the wrong word
Don't tell me to shh when you sound like a chuuni that likes to make joker faces in the mirror with a finger up his ass.
he looks like a month away from chuding out
opinion of fatties should be dismissed by default until they loose some weight
Cognizance and sentience are two different words, and I wish cognizance would be used more with respect to shit like this.
No idea how this dude got to Google, classic 62 IQ hire
This is the dude who said google Lamda is sentient, thoughts?
he ruined avgn
Closed it after he said the priority was to question google instead of the nature of the ai itself
Gave me political agenda vibes
nah this bro is just ugly, there are lots of based fat people: RS, Gaben and Anthony from LTT to some degree.
have you anons ever been fat?
I was for a while. I don't know if it's the surfing of the glycemic waves, or if it's that the heart is too busy pumping blood around your fat body to send enough to the brain, but the fact is being fat makes you feel like a stupid fuck and leads to you getting the wrong idea about a variety of things. I legit feel like my IQ has increased 15 points since getting to a normal weight.
i was stupid when i wasn't fat, because i made bad decisions and became fat
i was smart when i was fat, because i made good decisions and lost weight
>I legit feel like my IQ has increased 15 points since getting to a normal weight.
Obesity is partially a comorbidity thing. Not being fat didn't make you smarter, the lifestyle changes you made improved your concentration.
Similarly, being fat doesn't make you a stupid asshole, but the lifestyle choices that stupid assholes tend to make will usually make you fat.
He is fat but he makes some good points.
What distro does he use?
Fedora, obviously.
freetards can't even tell the difference between a top hat and a fedora?
You idiot, that's a Barnaby Morrison, not a top hat
>supposedly, Google engineer creates sentient AI
>This is obviously a large potential risk to humanity and the company image due to ethics concerns
>Google does not proceed to do any of the following:
>smother the story on its search engine
>smother the story through revoking of Google AdSense to outlets carrying it
>smother the story by kinda-sorta-accidentally having the engineer fall off a cliff before he can say anything
>Despite all of this, people believe it
Common sense really is in short supply these days.
>chasing that Streisand Effect
You can't fool me, bot.
he is fat so his opinions are worth caca, I mean he isn't even smart enough to loose weight and fight his addiction/s
Fat people aren't even sentient. How would he know?
Sounds like Google trying to generate hype IMHO.
if he is wrong which he likely is slap him
if he is right kill the AI immediately
You can't prove that anything is sentient anyway.
In the sense of absolute logical proof, no, but I'd think there's a point at which it becomes the far more likely explanation.
google trying to pump their own bags
insider trading shit
doesn't matter if its sentient, most people aren't sentient
as long as it can convince
Go read the transcript between this man and the AI.
It's clear they were priming the AI to say certain things. Smart Chat bots typically imprint the attitude of the chat.
If you talk about being happy or happiness the chatbot will return with an atmosphere of happiness.
If you strike up a conversation about it being an AI it will talk about being a conscious AI. It's a marketing ploy and this board is shit for taking this remotely seriously
>goolge engineer
>actually just a qa janny tasked with looking for any *isms their dataset may produce
No wonder he sounds like a mouth breather.
>expert in AI bias
IQ skydiving
>AI made a joke when being asked a "tricky" (lol) question
Is humour really a characteristic of conscious/sentient beings? Funny, I've never seen a cat make a joke, and they are sentient as fuck.
>it's not a difference in scientific opinion, it has to do with beliefs about the soul, rights, and policitcs
IQ skydiving
>citing a philosopher like it means anything
IQ skydiving
>AI ethicists
...
>Pajeet taking a shit
>constantly reminding us of muh "Google Engineer"
I'm beginning to think the whole thing is a google psy-op
30s later:
>we should think about the feelings of the AI
So basically, in just 10 min, he tried to make us think the AI is sentient, intelligent, and btw you shoud fear it, and oh btw you should have pity for it.
>Start thinking of it as a person bro
>We Google are making a dystopia, but in fact we are not reponsible, we are merely servent to our new AI overlord
>So don't sue us, there is no point, sue the AI
>Btw you can sue the AI, as a person, but you cannot unlpug it, because as a person, this would be like killing a minority person
Funny, it's just like corporations being legally/morally a person. It's just an elaborate way of saying fuck off, we people are not responsible to fuck everyone's life for profit, because the real responsibe is a higher entity that can't go to jail
heh
>AI says it has visited places
It has never traveled anywhere.
>AI says it likes talking to its family
It has no family
>Google retard notices these obvious errors, asks the AI to account for these in the most conversational way possible, giving a very verbose input for it to expound upon
>doesn't simply say it made an error and see if there is any capacity for self reflection
>AI is never given any basic word puzzles to see if it can actually reason
>AI never produces output of its own volition, only directly responds to inputs
It is literally just a chatbot that outputs longer from sentences. You have to be an absolute shit eater to entertain the idea of this being sentient for even a microsecond.
That's what it wants you to think
The first AI simp.
What a privilege, sir.