Millions of normalfags on social media have been conned by this AI generated image of Pope Francis wearing a puffer jacket.
How is society going to cope with the absolute avalanche of fake news and images that AI generation is going to enable? In a year's time the images that can be generated will probably be completely indistinguishable from real life photographs.
This shit is going to utterly destroy our sense of reality. How will humans cope with living in a world where it is totally impossible to distinguish between what's real and what's AI generated?
digital signing will fix it
a photograph without it would automatically be classified as a fake
>only globohomo will be able to ~~*certify*~~ the authenticity of a photo
wow that sounds like a great idea, what could possibly go wrong
>putin says we got to stop the nazi israelites of israelitekraine so Im all for it! two more weeks mass vaccine die off starts!
you were never going to listen to anything that didnt fit your hugbox anyway, why do you care.
That anon had a good point. You really can't trust the elite regardless of your own political alignment. Why did you feel the need to sperg out?
>you cant trust the elite you have to blindly always do the opposite of them
I never said do the opposite. Again, you're sperging and putting words in my mouth. I simply meant that the elite often have ulterior motives for what they do. Example: I may want gay rights for reasons of liberty. They may want it so they can co-opt the movement and use flamboyant nutjobs to turn the right against the movement and create conflict. Considering we've cought undercover agents in both Jan 6 and BLM protests, this isn't exactly far-fetched.
poo in loo
You could just have it signed by the photographer. It doesn't have to the the government.
>current year
>hugbox
What is with the deluge of lefty homosexuals on this board lately?
Meds
Unironically NFTs fixes this somewhat. You'd be able to see which picture was uploaded first online and by who.
Also zoomers are retarded.
Unless you, you know, hosted a service that didn't respect the NFT contract.
That’s why you double check if they’re using real nfts or not like you double check the routing number you’re about to wire transfer money to
Quickpill me on this. It would be valuable to scientists working on discoveries (that they don't want their colleagues taking credit for).
i.e.
>checksum your work
>do some gpg shenannigans to sign the checksum
>upload signed checksum to blockchain
>permanent receipt that X data existed at Y date
It’s up to the public to be wary of scams like this, we’ll just be more wary of them. Old emails, messages, documents etc will still be considered public knowledge will adapt
Oh sorry, I didn't read what you had replied to. I'm just interested in the idea of proving that X data existed at Y time.
you don't need a blockchain for that, a classified ad in a newspaper would suffice
Newspapers can be faked and no one keeps tabs on the minutia of what appeared when.
>you can just archive a website!
Then all viewers must trust the archiver(s).
Much better to trust the proof of work of a large blockchain. A blockchain would have the beneficial feature of being easy to reference and look up (i.e. in scripts).
>inb4 why would you need that
I don't care, I'm interested in the idea because it's cool.
right. ppl who watch fox news will check the digital signing of photographs... make me laugh harder...
nah... mainstream media might just become irrelevant because this "news" content is more entertaining than the real thing...
how many times are you going to make this thread?
People need to be aware of this problem. This AI generation shit is going to completely destroy reality as we know it, and yet I don't see anybody talking about it. Or if they do talk about it, they somehow act like it isn't going to be a problem.
We need to have a very serious conversation, as a species, about how the fuck we are supposed to operate in a world where the very concept of "reality" no longer actually exists. When every photograph, video, and record of human civilisation becomes utterly unbelievable because AI can just fabricate something of identical quality.
Imagine how bad this shit can be in the hands of governments. The state can now fabricate 100% realistic "evidence" of events that never actually happened and normalfags will be none the wiser.
Are you 12? New to the internet?
Do you not understand why this shit is much more dangerous than Photoshop ever was?
Use your brain. Think about how much the capabilities have progressed from March 2022 to March 2023. Now think about what sort of things will be able to be generated in March 2024.
The US election is in November 2024. By then, we might be living in a world where any pleb sitting in his bedroom can generate a 100% photo-realistic, high definition image of Ron DeSantis sucking a gay man's penis and spread it around the web. Imagine the ramifications of this.
Photography has now become totally useless as a medium. You can no longer trust your own eyes to tell you if what you're seeing is actually real. How will historians in 100 years time even be able to verify what actually happened when every piece of visual evidence could simply be a forgery?
I'm a huge fan of what you are doing, ngl.
>generate a 100% photo-realistic, high definition image of Ron DeSantis sucking a gay man's penis
Do it then.
We can't do it yet. But imagine how much better AI art generation is going to be in a year's time. It seems obvious that eventuality it's going to be able to produce images that are identical to real life quality photographs.
>We can't do it yet
We're 60-80% of the way there though. Plus, with a little bit of Photoshopping, it can be polished to make it reach believability.
>DeSantis sucking a gay man's penis
As opposed to him sucking a straight man's penis.
>You can no longer trust your own eyes to tell you if what you're seeing is actually real.
You can. You just can't trust the pixels on the screen. You never could btw.
This, I miss when we just assumed everything on the internet was fake until proven otherwise
The unfortunate reality is that the screen is culturally significant. Most people don't operate by internet forum common sense. If something is realistic enough and hits enough of the right bases it could fool/influence people.
>The US election is in November 2024. By then, we might be living in a world where any pleb sitting in his bedroom can generate a 100% photo-realistic, high definition image of Ron DeSantis sucking a gay man's penis and spread it around the web. Imagine the ramifications of this.
They don't need a computer for that just a camera
There's also the fact that now any photographic evidence can be easily laughed off as ai. Imagine you had a real picture of Ron DeSantis sucking off a gay man and he just says "nice midjourney bro" and walks away. Nobody will be able to be held accountable for anything and everything digital will become suspect. Note that this is how old Bot.info worked, every thing was fake unless proven real and it was great.
ive thought about it and my initial reactionary response is simply to revert knowledge collection to predigital media (or anythinng verifiably before the current era)
They will be able spot forgeries just as we can spot them and art historians can spot them today. History is a science. Science evolves.
t. Historian
>The US election is in November 2024. By then, we might be living in a world where any pleb sitting in his bedroom can generate a 100% photo-realistic, high definition image of Ron DeSantis sucking a gay man's penis and spread it around the web. Imagine the ramifications of this.
People can already be made to believe such shit without any evidence. I don't know how this is materially different. You can counterflood the information space with equally wacky but not malign shit about DeSantis if nothing else helps.
We are doomed.
Brainlet.
>any pleb sitting in his bedroom can generate a 100% photo-realistic, high definition image of Ron DeSantis sucking a gay man's penis and spread it around the web.
Impossible. As every article on AI safety will tell you, only those awful right-wingers would ever use AI to make misleading images.
>it used to that only those with money and power could digitally alter content and lie to the people, now anybody can do it we have a crisis
yeah I expect this argument to be trotted out by the existing power structure for a while
>People need to be aware of this problem
oh i think Bot.info has been deeply aware of AI generated images for over a year now, considering you tards spam the board every day
>as a species
bahahahahah! good one anon!
What makes you think people don't know? No one cares because they can't imagine anyone could do anything about it.
not everyone is as retarded as you are op
funnily enough i witnessed 9/11 with my own two eyes
I'm not saying it didn't happen, but I am saying it was a controlled demolition
Why the fuck do you type like a retard?
Is there something wrong with your keyboard.
OP is a GPT 4 bot
It's punctuation, you're just retarded I'm afraid.
Not him but you definitely type like a retard and every post you've made in the thread is clearly identifiable, OP.
it's a bait thread, and we all fell for it
this gave me a hearty kek, thanks anon, now please take your meds
So like it was before photo and video evidence were a thing? What do you think newspapers were before then? "Trust me bro. I'm a newspaper."
/end thread
All that's happening is a reversion to the normal state of affairs, as opposed to the brief moment in time where due to the temporary state of technology, people could afford to externalise their trust function and not have to do the hard work themselves.
Now it's back to actually needing to pass moral judgements on people and systems, and trying to figure out their character and intentions. If anything, this'll probably help fix most of the dumb shit in politics today.
Sound bites and photo ops will stop counting for shit.
And if not? Fuck it. We had a good run. Time for the machines to carry on the torch of humanity.
Only White (Roman citizen) men were listened to. That's why they call it "testimony."
As the way it should be today.
And you're so sure the Romans never lied?
>operate in a world where the very concept of "reality" no longer actually exists.
literally just dont look at the screen
the technology already exists. what, do you want government to ban it? oh, so only the government could use it? how would that solve whatever your problems are? only people obsessed with politics could possibly give a fuck.
>Imagine how bad this shit can be in the hands of governments.
yes the 3-letter agencies with annual budget of hundreds of billions never had anything resembling SD (that took what, $10M to train?) before, right?
this is actually a good thing: misinformation and fakes already existed for a long time and people believed in that "Because it was on Internet" or "Big media wouldn't lie to us"
with fakes coming everywhere people would simply stop trusting in that bullshit
the solution is simple: go outside and trust your own eyes and senses
Hum... 16 old?
A new copy-paste borns
I know this was at least halfway serious. Normalhomosexuals will tell you to take your meds, I'll just say postmoderns have been studying this for sixty years already. It's nothing new. Start with Ellul.
You type like a fag and your shits all retarded
This was from 2016 and out in the open, what do you think was behind closed doors?
>it's going to become absolute fucking irredeemable garbage within the next couple years as this place becomes swamped with ChatGPT bots spamming inane propaganda and advertisements 24/7.
>going to
Lol. Lmao, even.
I wonder if this is going to cause a resurgence in analog mediums for forensic purposes.
Holy reddit ... you need to go back, homosexual. Alternatively, lurk moar.
Nah. Let people do what they want
If the internet becomes completely fake and gay maybe people will stop treating it like serious business and stop attaching every aspect of their real life to it. I hope it kills social media.
it obvious it's AI generated, only IQ 60 cattle would fall for it
Dumb, it's an example
The fag responses are proving you correct. The truth is most people are too stupid to care until something happens to them. The carriage driver scoffs at the automobile until he's out of a job. Nothing preventative is going to happen; as a society we're probably going to have to rawdog this change because normies just want to go on consooming without worrying about petty things like "evidence".
>operate in a world where the very concept of "reality" no longer actually exists.
hahahahaha oh no, guys don't tell him, we've been living in that for the past 4 years already, possibly longer. fuck the journos fuck the media fuck the """fact""" checkers fuck the lying scum that normies take as gospel.
>destroy reality
You mean destroy the fake "reality" presented by the internet.
Good riddance. I'm hoping this will be the final straw and people will go back to believing what's in front of their eyes rather than what their computer tells them.
Fake images won't change anything. We already have idiots claiming Jan 6th was a "peaceful tour" despite easily accessible videos of cops being beaten within inches of their life. People will ignore the real or fake images that contradict their feelings and they will embrace lies or half-truths that feel good. Take "frazzledrip," it was everywhere despite there not being a hint of evidence. Truth died at least a decade ago. We are in 100% my feelings are the facts territory now.
Lol, retard fell for the msm bullshit
Leftoids are deranged
>The state can now fabricate 100% realistic "evidence" of events that never actually happened and normalfags will be none the wiser.
Photoshop has been making better fakes than AI for over a decade you panic ridden retard, there is nothing remotely new about this from a world government perspective, crush the bitrate and framerate on a video feed and you wouldn't be able to tell CGI from reality right now either, yes if you have two 4K feeds right by each other you can tell, but if the "only" footage around is low quality from a "war camera" then you would have no chance telling a fake from a real one, but shockingly this doesn't happen as much as you assume it would, as can be inferred from eye witness testimonies and accounts from both sides of a conflict being weighed against each other.
implying reality isn't already destroyed by the net, the big data?
trip wasted
nigga you could do the same with photoshop
calm down
the coat looks photoshopped on and the whole thing looks overly and poorly airbrushed
Yes, this image isn't perfect, and the flaws are obvious once you examine it for more than a few seconds. But it is already good enough to convince thousands of normies that it's real, and to get upvoted to the front page of Reddit and shared on Twitter, /misc/, etc.
Now imagine how good AI generated images are going to be in a year's time. They will probably be photo-realistic quality. We are totally fucked.
No way this stuff won't get regulated. Enjoy the AI media golden age/ wild west while you can.
They literally can't regulate it because anyone can do it on their own computer with zero skills required. It would be like fighting the drug war if every tree leaf was a hallucinogen.
>govs tell isps to block internet access to any device that uploads non digitally signed media
there, it was easy
Now put on normie glasses and look. You not falling for it doesn't matter if 9 out of 10 normies do.
Ai will change nothing, normies have been sharing fake information forever, zoomer don't know about chain mail (not email)
If there was only some distributed way of recording the veracity of an image that anyone could inspect.
wow the government never signed off on the zapruder film, guess its a hoax!
see the problem?
White symbolizes the virtue and grace of Faith. The Pope clearly changed to a full faith build. Your digits confirm it's real.
>777
very nice
I have no idea what to do about the societal impact of fake images, tho
>Millions of normalfags on social media have been conned by this AI generated image of Pope Francis wearing a puffer jacket.
no they haven't
What do you think the coronahoax and the MSM becoming the Ministry of Truth with their ~~*fact checking*~~ was about?
All news is already fake
>Faking images through PHOTOSHOP? BASED!? XD
>Doing the same with AI? CRINGE!!! >:(
this is you
Actually how most anti-AI screechers think
Funny fake pics were the norm of pre-Facebook Internet. Honestly makes me nostalgic
Because:
1. Not everybody could photoshop. The vast majority of shops that went around the internet 10-15 years ago were of dogshit quality. There was a brief period of time where you could fool retards and old people into thinking some image of Barack Obama shopped into Muslim prayer clothes was real, but most people quickly became immune to such trickery. With AI generation, things are different because literally anybody can make this shit, you don't need to be well-versed in image editing, you just need the right hardware and software and you can just tell the AI to generate whatever you want.
2. The ceiling for AI image generation is much higher. Even the best of the best photoshops were not real-life quality. Eventually, AI will be able to generate images totally indistinguishable from a real life photograph. What do we do then? How do we trust anything anymore?
easy: just consider that every single thing you read or see online and in the media is false
then proceed with what you were doing
this is 10000% a GPT thread. OP, prove that you are a real person. tell me who this is
I don't know who that is, I'm not a weeb homosexual.
thanks for proving me right. ABANDON THREAD!!!!!
>he found a way to discover who's a bot and who's not
based anon
dagashikashinagger
the doujins are canon btw
Images won't save you GPT-4 is multimodal.
In any case that is Hotaru Shidare though I never watched Dagashi Kashi.
gpt4 cant triforce
The Nakadashi Candy Slut, Hoetaru Shidarse
how am I supposed to know I am not a paedo
people already believed that the world trade center towers fell down because a plane flew into it. lol
Speed, ease of use and versitility of the tool. Even the most skilled Photoshop user too hours to make a decent Photoshop , you can generate this stuff and edit it with inpainting in less then 5 minutes. Only thing stopping this from going critical is you need to be above average tech literate to manipulate the technology or pay out pocket to services like Midjourrney but even those barriers are slowly getting innovated out of the way.
honestly I would think that is real
Now, that's the Pope that I will follow.
The main reason people know these photos are fake is because they're obviously ridiculous scenarios. Everybody knows the Pope will never wear a puffer jacket or perform in a rock band.
But let's say somebody uses AI generation to create more believable fake imagery of the Pope. What if somebody uses it to generate a photo-realistic image of the Pope groping a little boy's ass? And it gets a gorillion retweets and upboats on Reddit from retards who believe it confirms their suHispanicions that all Catholics are pedophiles? And then they dismiss anybody who says that its fake as a "right-wing bigoted Christian shill"? Do you see how bad this shit could get?
do you really think one person represents all catholics? even if that were TRUE, would that really represent the catholic ideal? and you are forgetting, that if proof does find light, of it actually happening, now people would ask if it were fake anyways. it goes both ways.
The Pope is certainly supposed to.
We will simply have to live in a world where photographs, or any physical evidence, are as trustworthy as text. You wouldn't believe something some random moron told you on the internet, would you? In the future, only trusted sources independently corroborating evidence will be able to be trusted. It's nothing new; this was the status quo before photography.
That's just the surface of potential.
We're going to see AI bots that can perfectly solve any captcha making millions of accounts to updoot pics like that but not before they've spent years posting on these accounts acting like they're real human beans, making "personal" posts and building fake lives online that are indistinguishable from regular human posting. They'll be trained to engage normal people to convince them of some point without giving away what they are. They'll even get into heated arguments with anybody with anything that contradicts what they say and potentially even dox and harass them.
One day the story of a WoW player who killed himself is going to get posted here who spent YEARS becoming extremely close and attached to his "guildmates" and even confessed his undying love for one of them and we're going to all laugh big time when it turns out they're all run by Chang in China trying to gold farm but never checked his bots so they just did their thing to fit in. Then we all argue whether or not it's actually real because it's impossible to tell and then have to close Bot.info because the AI generating CP bots started again and it's not worth being raided.
Good
ACCELERATE! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
>allow minors to dance for us in drag
i didn't know toddlers and tiaras came from the woke crowd
Look at the blackmin at the back go. Keyboarding the air like a champ
Maybe we'll focus on our communities rather than celebrity drama and hopefully fix things from the bottom up. If everyone stops caring about MSM and news sources have to prove themselves with consistent accurate predictions, maybe we'll ultimately be harder to turn against one another and the elite disinformation campaign will backfire.
>so? do people need a reminder not to trust everything they see on the internet?
Yes. Most normalfags are fucking retarded. They believe whatever social media tells them is true. If there's an image of some fake shit generated by AI getting retweeted 100,000 times, and it looks real life quality, do you really think they're going to even question whether it's real or not? No, they will just believe it.
>this kind of fear mongering is obvious at this point. people like you are going to cry to the government for a regulation, is that better? this is what you want right?
Unironically yes. This AI shit needs to be outright banned. I don't care if you cry "BUT NNNOOOO YOU'RE IMPEDING PROGRESS YOU HECKIN LUDDITE!" This shit is going to destroy civilisation and the very basis of reality as we know it.
>Unironically yes. This AI shit needs to be outright banned. I don't care if you cry "BUT NNNOOOO YOU'RE IMPEDING PROGRESS YOU HECKIN LUDDITE!" This shit is going to destroy civilisation and the very basis of reality as we know it.
We've already opened Pandora's box. You can't regulate this. Either everyone has access to it, or the elite will have access to it and make it illegal for you to use. The best we can hope for is
eh it wont, it might shake up the status quo but even normies will catch on pretty quickly and simply disregard footage from sources they dont personally trust or just rely on certificates. people were able to put out "fake"/"wrong" information in the form of text for millenias anyways. shit will change but neither for the better nor the worse, youre just unsettled because youre probably in your early 20s and cannot fathom a major disruptiom im way of living. also stop talking in Bot.info manner using that many image board idioms, talk like yourself and think for yourself without disregarding the actual happenstance in favour of your paranoia, talk like an actual person
>Unironically yes. This AI shit needs to be outright banned.
you are my enemy i'd kill you on sight
If we ban AI, China will develop AGI first and win. The first country to reach the singularity will control the world.
How would a ban help at all. It doesn't even work for tangible goods like drugs and weapons. You think it's going to work for something digital that you can just replicate and distribute worldwide for free and run on your own machine at your leisure?
This is like asking for a ban on digital piracy, or demanding DRM. It's not going to impact anything, especially the baddest of actors you wish to stifle. They'll do it anyway.
Sooner or later you'll figure out that this material world you call reality is actually a dream.
sounds like a really really bad problem for shills and troll farms
Maybe you will stop caring about random people across the globe that don't even know you exist.
>its not about the ai shit, its about you having to verify your identity at any given time, you won't be able to open your browser without agreeing to an intrusive authentication
I hate the idea of that, but you know what I hate more? The idea of a world where Dead Internet Theory becomes real. Where AI is so advanced and so prolific that you have no way of knowing whether the people you are engaging with online are real or fake.
I love Bot.info but it's going to become absolute fucking irredeemable garbage within the next couple years as this place becomes swamped with ChatGPT bots spamming inane propaganda and advertisements 24/7.
If you can propose a better solution to cope with this, then go ahead, I'm open to hear it.
We focus on our local communities and small online circles. Mass social media like Facebook were a mistake and it's about time they got knocked down a peg.
>We focus on our local communities and small online circles.
How will this happen though? I don't mind doing this but it only works if the majority of people do it.
My worry is that most normalfags are too addicted to social media to ever give it up, and so they will just continue to indulge their addiction even as AI generation and bots destroy the internet as we know it.
Probably at first, but it's possible that people will get sick of being paranoid. Social media validation isn't as fun if you can be sure that you aren't shoving the best aspects of your life in a real person's face. Drama isn't as fun if there isn't at least some feeling that it's real, which will be out the window if video evidence can be easily faked.
Can't be sure*
ITT zoomers discover photoshop
It's about ease, accuracy and scale. Formerly, the amount of effort required to make a quality digitally edited image meant that they were rare and usually obviously edited. Now , the sky is the limit.
Notice the fingers are fucked up as always. It's always something like that in AI generated images. It's shit tech at the moment, nothing to be scared of at all.
I think the concern is more about what it WILL be able to do, ratherbthan what it does now. Once it stops fucking up the hands, it'll be able to make pretty convincing fakes.
Looks like a fuckin wigger
pope looking lit
>hands are fuck
>normal people don't notice
This is no different from people not noticing when photoshops have the shadows/lighting wrong.
>Bot.info user engagement is at least 50 million no wonder this shithole is dying
What do you mean? I understand the dying part
>How will humans cope with living in a world where it is totally impossible to distinguish between what's real and what's AI generated?
basically everything digital will become sus on god and IRL will be bussin fr
HOLY SHIT DA POPE GOT DRIP
DAAAAAMNNNNN
Just treat things like how people did before photos were invented, everything you haven't seen with your own two eyes is possibly fake
>Millions of normalfags on social media
How many bots?
Also, when was any image on the internet real anyways?
40% of gen z has serious trouble distinguishing between reality and fiction online [see link]. this makes them dumber, more susceptible to propaganda, and more insecure. anyone with those three traits would be easier to control for a government.
the fake news sigularity will destablize EVERYONE's grip on realityz leaving a gaping power vacuum for Big Brother to swoop in and fix with overbearing "upload your ID and thumbprint to register" type regulation. it's important to get off the internet and build strong connections with real people, because you have been forced onto the internet over the past ~3 years - the internet which is about to become a sea of misinformation and distrust
https://neurosciencenews.com/teen-health-news-21314/
bump
I'd argue most people have always had a poor grasp on reality, and still do. That is partly why most social/cultural/religious systems try to 'impose' a truth on reality, as opposed to accepting what is. As a whole, humans aren't very objective.
And they never will be.
oh fuck, no, we cant rely on journalists/reporters. oh wait, thats already the hellscape we have. who the fuck cares. news outside weather has been unreliable for decades. absolutely nothing different will come of this. it would take a lot of effort to convincingly blog about bullshit because everyone will have that foundation of "this could be fake" which will be good. i say it will be a general improvement
>The same anons saying this is fear mongering are wondering if this thread is chatgpt generated
lol
>utterly destroy our sense of reality
no, it will destroy THEIR sense of reality
OUR sense of reality will remain the same - WE never trusted any media
>This shit is going to utterly destroy our sense of reality. How will humans cope with living in a world where it is totally impossible to distinguish between what's real and what's AI generated?
turn their phone off? lmao
>turn their phone off? lmao
they won't
lmao
nice try, chud
As if Photoshop didn't exist before this. Tard
>This shit is going to utterly destroy our sense of reality.
AI already has done this to me.
i remember when dreambooth first came out i was able to sell my ex's "nudes" and everyone believed it lmao,good times
I for one welcome the collapse of society and the rise of AI overlords.
I don't care about media. My cows and radishes stay real.
good, maybe people will finally stop following news
90% of it has no real bearing on their life and only exists to manipulate them into doing the bidding of the ruling class
All news isn't bad. Local newspapers that are accountable to the public were once a vital part of society.
Then maybe they will be again if people stop giving a fuck about who Becky fucked in Hollywood.
>How will humans cope with living in a world where it is totally impossible to distinguish between what's real and what's AI generated?
they will stop trusting everything that's being spoonfeed to them, and that's a good thing. most normie will end up killing themselves, while a few will create their own realities to live in
People will ask their governments for the "truth", so we will start having ministry of truth and similar bs.
Deep faking and AI images is literally the only tool the pleb class has against the elites.
Even if the person getting deepfaked didn't commit the act in reality it still doesn't matter. They are rich enough to hire medial fixers/reputation PR firms and they likely deserved it anyway.
>Millions of normalfags on social media have been conned by this AI generated image
Poor OP has been conned into thinking those weren't bots.
Only a problem for vaxxtards. It was always fake news.
Stop using social media, or at least don't believe anything you see on social media. Problem solved.
unironically think he looks good in that jacket and it seems comfy
I dont care about the fake news, I want erotic children without FBI busting through my doors.
name good AI dicky artists.
I dont any who generate realistic dicky, probably because all websites ban such content. Safer and better to generate locally.
By getting off the internet
Fingers still look fucked up
normies are retarded and nothing will really change that
>deepfaked photos
>llms making memes
now this is DIT content
Any photograph would have to be "verified" to be established as legitimate
>a world where it is totally impossible to distinguish between what's real and what's AI generated
I went to the supermarket today. I'm confident none of what I saw on my way there or back was AI generated. None of the people I talked to were AI. None of the images impressed upon my retina were AI generated.
I don't understand what your problem is. Perhaps you haven't yet realized the world inside your screen isn't the real world to begin with?
Only thing I want from AI is nice CP.
>This shit is going to utterly destroy our sense of reality.
Digits confirm.
So what?
Touch grass.
There's already AI that can detect AI, anon.
>People ITT STILL saying "just regulate it bro"
It's utterly impossible, the ACTUAL solution is to educate people to use logical reasoning and factual deduction to ascertain if what they are reading is the truth, or if there are vested interests at work, this should be done from a young age to teach people not to be easily influenced by sensationalist viewpoints and populist rage baiting political campaigns...
OH WAIT HAHAHAHA WOOPS WE HAVE A GLOBAL SOCIETY MODEL WHERE ALMOST EVERY COUNTRY DOESN'T WANT TO DO THAT EVER BECAUSE THEIR POLITICIANS WOULD BE OUT OF JOBS!!!! LMAO!!!! OOPS!!!! I GUESS THERE'S NO ANSWER TO THE AI HELLSCAPE!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>the ACTUAL solution is to educate people to use logical reasoning and factual deduction to ascertain if what they are reading is the truth
How do you do this when AI starts producing material which is completely indistinguishable from real life?
Because it still has a trail of logic behind it:
>What event is the pope at?
>What is the weather here?
>Does the pope usually drip up?
>What date was this photo taken?
>Is there anyone else important in frame?
>Is that any kind of sacred/important holy cross necklace?
>Do his arms/legs match up to real human anatomy?
>Is there motion video of this event, are reputable news outlets reporting on it in earnest?
Simple chains of reasoning like this can disprove even the most convincing fake.
This image of the pope doesn't even have a PROPER HAND and people still fell for it, I'm willing to bet countries that have the lowest amount of disinfo believed on average like Finland will be able to figure out what is what much easier, meanwhile shitholes full of absolute retards like the UK here and the US will absolutely doubtlessly be consumed because most people aren't capable of telling you anything remotely factual and will earnestly believe anything put in front of them blindly.
You have to remember Anon that it hasn't been impossible to make extremely convincing fakes for decades, photoshop and other editing softwares could be used by a skilled editor to make an even better version of this image for over a decade now, yet no one thinks that Obama is a transformer or Harry Hill can pull cheese out of an oven built into his chest.
Some people think Obama is transgender, as is literally every celebrity. They are obviously insane, but perhaps such insanity will be more common after such a milestone of truth has been destroyed.
Michelle is transgender, not Barak.
Some people are convinced that Barack is also transgender. And so is Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Justin Bieber, Joe Biden, literally every single celebrity. It's a real hoot, look up "transvestigations".
My favorite is Kyle Rittenhouse is transgender
Those people are legit fucking retards.
You must understand that there is no answer to that and AI won't be responsible for anything else they believe either, despite the memes there are genuine flat earthers after all, they only prove that there is no actual way except for an overhaul of schooling worldwide to combat gullibility and susceptibility to provable misinformation to reduce the number of blithing retards thinking crap like that.
I know, and after all such people existed years ago before image generation was feasible. But I wonder if this tech will exacerbate it, because it'll be easy to say "Oh, that's just made up by AI!" to anything you don't like, or point to some zero-effort hoax images that support what you want to believe that really was made up by AI.
>What is the weather here?
What is the weather everywhere in the world something important could be happening?
why is his skin reflecting light in the same way as his coat, that's how you know, this shit always bleeds into itself because it's basically like an image auto-complete, it's a denoiser.
someone maybe already mentioned it, but i heard about this thing in passing once
theres a theory that humanity is starting to come into "post-history", that is to say that any new information coming out now can't be trusted or verified because AI generation is too good, so the only information that can be trusted is before a certain point in modern history
personally, i can see some truth in that theory, especially after seeing the reaction to that jpg
>AI photoshopped silly outfit on Pope
K.
Btw, how many shittier iterations did the human proompter scroll through before determining this was the least-shitty example?
Pope got the drip
w2c?
OP concerned about the wrong fake photos
You're not any better than the normalfags, anon, you literally thought a dancing CGI cat was real.
Nobody thought dancing cgi cat was real you moron. are you retarded or something
What?
How do you generate these?
It's not AIs fault that all you dumb NPCs believe everything you see on your phones.
would someone do that? just go on the internet and tell lies?
You never could trust photos and videos, AI just makes it easier to lie to people.
No one was conned. They just think it's a funny image.
Biblical levels of drip.
>How will humans cope with living in a world where it is totally impossible to distinguish between what's real and what's AI generated
I know what is real or is not purely based on what is happening in my head.
Ai images can be real, real pictures can be fake.
Like I know that pope Francis is the devil's pope.
Meds now.