This AI shit unironically mind blowing. Where do we go from there?

This AI shit unironically mind blowing. Where do we go from there?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        for americans the rent isn't free

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        malding

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        can dalle create wojaks?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          wait till the sharty gets their hands on this technology.....

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you pay tax money to have your military everywhere to no benefit to you. youre literally paying rent to be in our heads

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder what's the rent IN America..

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        looks like Gabe

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My girlfriend is cuter.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wait when did Gabe bleach his hair?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it's natural. he's having a hard time since the deck flopped so bad. also, looks like he weighs half than last year

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/tgPa7hO.jpg

      la creatura

      It only needs some phyisics training, those weelchairs would never be able to hold the weight

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >scene of a hippopotamus enjoying a meal

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Average sized American with mild disability holding small snack cheering for their favourite race

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/Q3qiYSb.png

      https://i.imgur.com/NpCVkk4.jpg

      el ogro...

      https://i.imgur.com/tgPa7hO.jpg

      la creatura

      https://i.imgur.com/unJGPpU.jpg

      https://arc.tencent.com/en/ai-demos/faceRestoration

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>the burger ATTACHED onto the left hand

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "We" are not going anywhere. Science and technology are merely tools of oppression helping to create more slaves.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Retard

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >slaves
      Ain't nobody want that. What these developments do is they remove the need for people. One tiny demographic at a time, you become unneeded and unwanted, just marked for death. A slow one, of your own making, while you are made to feel guilt and shame.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, that because this isn't "we". "we" didn't create and don't own any of these technologies. They will be rented to us in limited form if it makes the owners profit.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And yet you are here on the internet and not living in the mountains without electricity, you monumental fucking hypocrite.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The Internet is indeed used as a tool for invigilation, yes. The fact that it's everywhere and that I need to use it unless I want to cut all ties with family and friends is not something I have control over.

        Why? Because you will no longer be paid to contribute nothing to society?

        >Oh no, my art job is redundant, I'm a slave! I have to actually contribute real value to society to get paid and enjoy its benefits!
        What tech does is it takes the worthless eaters like artists and it reminds them how useless they always were. Basically you are a cotton picking dumbfuck being replaced during the industrial revolution.

        A buckbroken wagecuck or a sperglord denying the fact that his meat calculator job will also be easily replacable. Either way, acquire class consciousness. Until then, meds.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why? Because you will no longer be paid to contribute nothing to society?

      >Oh no, my art job is redundant, I'm a slave! I have to actually contribute real value to society to get paid and enjoy its benefits!
      What tech does is it takes the worthless eaters like artists and it reminds them how useless they always were. Basically you are a cotton picking dumbfuck being replaced during the industrial revolution.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      At some point the elites won't need 99% of the population anymore, we'll all be replaced by robots.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >he thinks its AI
    its using image search as a starting point you fucktard

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No it's literally AI

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >starting point
      Oh, well then I guess there is nothing amazing about it at all.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can already see hacks generating these then tracing or just slightly reworking them it's crazy

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you know what photobashing is?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not him, but I will gladly "bash" your head in, gay

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/EAkxOzH.png

      guess what i put

      https://i.imgur.com/NpCVkk4.jpg

      el ogro...

      https://i.imgur.com/tgPa7hO.jpg

      la creatura

      https://i.imgur.com/BVRh5FK.jpg

      generation-worthy prompt, this is the best of the four

      What AI is this?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        These all appear to be DALL-E 2 generations to me.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's really not

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    guess what i put

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      glow in the darks

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ok, I am laughing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      new BOT reaction image hot off the press

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI is the future

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A glow in the dark cia agent that is African American digital art?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        3 letter phosphorescent black agent

        you dont have to add the descriptor black or african, it will add it for you

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      3 letter phosphorescent black agent

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lost

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/kIJ5AB0.png

      AI is the future

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOO YOU CAN'T MAKE THAT ART! THAT'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT!
    >USE THE ROBOT! IT'S NOT SUBJECT TO IP LAWS
    every human would be capable of achieving beauty if it wasn't illegal to. information is the ultimate evil in this world unless you're an """AI""".

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I actually agree with this. Anything your AI makes must be owned by the owners of the materials used in training it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they gonna profit from all the human knowledge and you will be happy.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What? Who is stopping you from making paintings?

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We generate child porn with it obviously

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This raises an interesting question: does ai generated content have to be treated with the same rules? Like e-boi porn isn't illegal, but cp is, so how would you rule ai generated cp?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Technically ai didn't generate all these images, they just rearrange pixel patterns from the dataset they've learnt, so any "generated" cp is a mixture of various existing cp.

        By that logic, yes it should be illegal, since ai could never generate cp if it never seen one.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Technically ai didn't generate all these images, they just rearrange pixel patterns from the dataset they've learnt, so any "generated" cp is a mixture of various existing cp.
          you have no idea what you're talking about, dunce. read about the topic and then come back hopefully knowing more.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe five years ago, but these new AI are sophisticated to the point where they can clearly merge concepts in unique ways. You think OP's picture is drawn only from the AI's understanding of hippos in hot tubs? Of course not. It's drawn from its understanding of hippos and hot tubs separately.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >By that logic, yes it should be illegal, since ai could never generate cp if it never seen one.
          Co-Pilot IS NOT ILLEGAL
          STOP TRYING TO PRETEND THE SOURCE MATERIAL MATTERS!

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Realistic drawn CP is illegal in the USA, so this would also apply.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/ViSJLOT.jpg

      This AI shit unironically mind blowing. Where do we go from there?

      It cant create porn so it's useless

      This raises an interesting question: does ai generated content have to be treated with the same rules? Like e-boi porn isn't illegal, but cp is, so how would you rule ai generated cp?

      e-boi is already barely legal in the US. The law on that is pretty vague and it's illegal in most of europe. Realistic looking e-boi porn would definitely be illegal. People in USA have actually got convicted for having e-boi. The law in USA is: if the general population thinks that the work clearly lack any literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Yes, it's that subjective. Porn is not considered freedom of expression in USA.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Find me a person in the US who was convicted for it who didn't also have real stuff in possession. The only time they give a shit is if it's something they can tack onto a more serious charge.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The people convicted have either also had the real stuff, comited rape or had previous convictions for one of those two.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      exactly like lab grown meat
      but the issue is it cannot produce ex nihilo
      it has to be trained on models
      so...

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is a common misconception.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          okay, enjoy the equivalent of ai generated volleyball matches trained on badminton and basketball

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tv, replace every character in this movie with nicholas cage
    >also change the plot so that they all end up in the same bed in the end

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just got access to DALL-E. What to do?

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nowhere
    And when it all comes crashing down, and you come crawling back to artists for work, they'll all be sure to tack on an nice extra 'thinking this AI could do shit better than them' fee

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    these look like shit

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what I don't understand with most of the machine learning stuff is that the AI is learning from resources that got created by humans like books, pictures etc. so in the end it can only create things that are in some way mixed or derived from what already exists and has been created by humans; not really new stuff. so in context of creating profound new, really creative stuff, it simply won't work

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, we've already seen that AI can extrapolate outside training data. For example, GPT-3 can be asked math questions, that was never present in the training data, and it will answer them correctly, because it has learned generalized arithmetic from the examples that does exist in the training data.
      You could say that this is still not new since it's still just within the concept of arithmetic which was present in the training data, but if you speak that broadly then it's the same for most humans. We also almost never generate something new, we are just inspired from existing art or existing culture and extrapolate on that. Otherwise it wouldn't even be good art, because if it has no connection to existing concepts, it has no meaning to us.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >For example, GPT-3 can be asked math questions, that was never present in the training data, and it will answer them correctly, because it has learned generalized arithmetic from the examples that does exist in the training data.
        hard to believe, since there are many examples of GPT-3 not understanding even some simple math (wrong results) problems when you change the numbers around

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Shut right the fuck up. You're spouting bullshit. You don't know what you're talking about. GPT stands for "generative pre-trained transformer" - there is no way for them to escape their prior training by their very nature. You can look at some of the prior frame animations that people have posted of DALLE-2 and figure this out:

        DALLE-2 will eventually converge towards data in its set in an orderly manner, and will even make transformations using other parameters in its training set, but coherence is not intelligent inference.
        Given a 100 question math test of basic arithmetic questions, its safe to say with near guaranteed certainty that mathematician will answer the test with 100% accuracy. There is a possibility that even GPT-3 could do that, but eventually, given enough generations, GPT-3 will make a what a human will interpret as an "objective mistake" simply because the model is entirely probabilistic. Humans, if you get reductive enough, also work on probabilities, but they're exponentially more accurate. Give the test to a mathematician 100 times, and there is an extremely high probability he will 100% all of those tests as well. GPT-3, and most transformers, fail as generations compound.
        The frustrating thing about generative transformers is that they are an easy, boring problem to solve for AI researchers because "error rates" in the arts are much more forgiving. However, teaching an AI to accurately navigate a city while driving a gas tanker, at this current time, is nearly impossible with current hardware, because the margins of error are so low.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why do you numbskulls keep conflating gpt3 and dalle2

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not conflating. Read the post I replied to, moron. Also, the original DALLE used a modified version of GPT-3 for text encoding, and DALLE-2 very likely uses that same modified model, but the AI primitives used for CLIP and GPT-3 are fundamentally the same, just using different types of data. Fuck right off.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              durka durka BUT THE ORIGINAL USED THIS YEARS AGO
              fuck outta here poser, do some book learning and then come back.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >poser

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Your understanding is too simplistic and rigid. If there was "no way for them to escape their prior training", then they would not be able to do anything other than word-for-word copy their training material. But they don't, they can rearrange the words in their training material into entirely new text, hence they have escaped their training material by definition.
          Sure, the output is probabilistic based on their training, but as said, that could in fact enough be to generate new things, because there's a good argument to be made that that's how humans work as well. All of our thoughts and ideas could in theory be extrapolated from past experience, memories and world-model. We don't know enough about neurology and AI to be sure, the systems are already too complex for us to make these kinds of black/white statements you are making.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >For example, GPT-3 can be asked math questions, that was never present in the training data, and it will answer them correctly, because it has learned generalized arithmetic from the examples that does exist in the training data.
        hard to believe, since there are many examples of GPT-3 not understanding even some simple math (wrong results) problems when you change the numbers around

        gpt-3 is hot garbage

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's not really what it's for. The goal is to process language in a natural way, it isn't meant to know random factoids.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          just asked my grandma, she gave the same answer.
          this confirms it: GPT-3 is an AGI.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but all humans do that retard and nobody can create anything truly new already

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Then where do you think those artists get their training and resources and ideas from if not from exisitng works of others. 'Profound' is subjective, but nothing is actually 'new'

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You do realise this is what humans are doing too

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >daniel x dall-e
    >human & ai
    so he painted over the generated images? why is everyone itt ignoring that line?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I think they just typed in the prompt, but want to think they're so smart because its 'AI'.

      Its machine learning. Hell, Dall-E wasn't even the first, but only the most popular at the moment.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone can type, but since it is machine learning, they have to think they're some sort of genius for doing that. I'm guilty of doing that too.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he did not.
      that's just the default caption on any dall-e 2 screenshot.
      see:
      https://labs.openai.com/s/mz8LiyvkI8KwD2luJ6MrS23m

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >see:
        >link that goes to a blank page
        thanks, now i know

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ""open""ai shills

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’ve been on the waitlist forever, what did you all put for the questions? Researcher? Student? Or something else

  19. 2 weeks ago
    dang

    el ogro...

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/tgPa7hO.jpg

      la creatura

      This is art

  20. 2 weeks ago
    dang

    la creatura

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, are those burger buns pancakes? Shit, that's a million dollar idea.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's called a McGriddle and it's not a million dollar idea here in America, it's a BILLION dollar idea.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    let me tell you which countries are white

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/EAkxOzH.png

      guess what i put

      I want to play BOT TCG now badly

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Generated this one today, guess which prompt I wrote kek

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Chinese person eating a bat soup?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      uma delicia

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good prompt. Screenshot of the angel enjoying tea and cookies from Hayao Miyazaki's My Neighbour Angel.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      would watch

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      "on your mark" by ghibli has basically this premise

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    collapse of society

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    However "Screenshot of Raka and Reki from Haibane Renmei" goes entirely sideways. Including Yoshitoshi ABe's name gets me a warning for no discernible reason.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Including Yoshitoshi ABe's name gets me a warning for no discernible reason.
      probably because of Shinzo Abe

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this shit makes me uncomfortable
    computers are not supposed to make art
    i want to turn back time

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      can't put the genie in the bottle, this train has no brakes and it's just going to get even more realistic and even better and eventually it will be open to the public without any restrictions.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this makes no sense.
        scaling hypothesis naturally is limited by the size of the dataset.
        gpt-3 is already trained on the whole internet. you won't easily get more data.
        unclip encoder/decoder is already trained on 650M/250M images.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >unclip encoder/decoder is already trained on 650M/250M images.
          and? that's a remarkable small pool of images from the entire internet, flickr alone has more images.
          every video on the internet is also just a series of images which could be used

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >When Google Images launched in 2001, 250 million images were indexed. By 2005, this was up to a billion images. Now, in 2010, they’re over 10 billion images indexed, Ling said.
            That was 12 years ago and isn't even including images on non indexed sites, imagine now.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >2011
              >Facebook does exist and is closing in on 100 billion photos hosted on the site, a number no one will be catching up to any time soon.
              >Flickr Boasts 6 Billion Photo Uploads
              >95 million photos and videos are shared on Instagram per day.
              >Over 40 billion photos and videos have been shared on the Instagram platform since its conception.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            who's going to provide labels for all those images?
            unlike LLMs you can't use unsupervised training for image creation.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                gpt-3 is already at the limit of our datasets.
                so dall-e 2 is already the best we can get for understanding prompts.
                looking at all those prompt engineering guides, dall-e 2 isn't that good at understanding prompts.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dalle2 is primitive compared to google parti you fucking crackhead
                keep up

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                both are diffusion models

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >dalle2 is primitive compared to google parti you fucking crackhead
                parti uses a generic transformer for understanding prompts. not palm.
                gpt-3 is superior.

                where are you fucking invaders coming from who keep posting without understanding the context of the post you're replying to
                are you robots? is this an ai invasion?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                retard pls.

                let's quote the parti paper
                "The text encoder after pretraining performs comparably to BERT [36] on GLUE (see Appendix G, Table 9); however, the text encoder degrades after the full encoder-decoder training process on text-to-image generation."
                BERT is several generations behind GPT-3.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                again you failed to understand the context of what you're replying to

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the context is

                gpt-3 is already at the limit of our datasets.
                so dall-e 2 is already the best we can get for understanding prompts.
                looking at all those prompt engineering guides, dall-e 2 isn't that good at understanding prompts.

                retard

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes and you're failing to understand it

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                both dall-e 2 and parti use text encoders.
                dall-e 2's gpt3 is superior to parti's BERT-like generic transformer.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you keep repeating yourself for some reason despite being both wrong and talking about something unrelated, I'm like 99% sure you're a failed AI.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                retard pls.
                you have given zero arguments.
                pls point out in the diagram which part is relevant for understanding prompts.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                DALL-E 2 can't understand the prompt "Black man with three heads" or "Cat with six legs". Both Imagen and Parti can. Imagen and Parti are better at understanding prompts.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Both Imagen and Parti can.
                Google, the gals actually having access to Imagen and Parti, deny this:
                "These models have many limitations. For example, neither can reliably produce specific counts of objects (e.g. “ten apples”)"
                https://blog.google/technology/research/how-ai-creates-photorealistic-images-from-text/

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty fake and outdated news. Sure it has some issues with counting and sometimes ignores it all together but it is capable of it and is overall more capable of understanding the meaning of prompts better than DALL-E 2

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                none of those show "ten apples"

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and none of your posts show DALL-E 2 having better understanding of prompts than imagen or parti, fuckface.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Dall-e2 consistently produces more impressive images, but lacks the flexibility of other software. I don't know how much of that is due to the gigantic no-badthink burden they place on image generation.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Bold claim but you don't have any evidence
                I'll give you a hint why you don't have evidence, because it's a lie.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Just based on my own experience right now. Dall-E 2 produces some nice looking stuff but the conceptual universe it can access - and its ease of use tools - are both lacking. Can't beat it for nice looking images though.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Line 3 contradicts line 2.
                Line 2 contradicts line 1.
                Dalle-2 doesn't even use GPT-3

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >dalle2 is primitive compared to google parti you fucking crackhead
                parti uses a generic transformer for understanding prompts. not palm.
                gpt-3 is superior.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      speakers make me uncomfortable
      machines are not supposed to record and replay art
      i want to turn back time

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        art is meant to be uniquely human

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You could argue that the planet earth itself is art, and humans for sure didn't create it.
          Art itself is shaped by nature. If we didn't see the Sun(which was not our creation) we wouldn't be able to depict it in paintings.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It just proves that art is a farce

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're a pile of neural networks, just like those AIs

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They still can't make art. All the aesthetic details and fine tuning. You'd have to reiterate over a shitty AI result hundreds of times to get a finished master piece (as it stands at least). Art is still alive and well.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        dummy, the ai can do those hundreds of iterations in microseconds.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          B-BUT THE HUMAN SPIRIT WILL PREVAIL; ART WILL ALWAYS BE ABOUT CREATIO ORGANICUM HUMANAE!

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here's a DMC music video made with all the dialogue line images generated by neural net.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >dmc jive
      didn't watch

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you and I both know no one would give either of those pictures even a passing glance if they were made by a human. so who cares?

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just got access today, any ideas?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah, compare it to some of the parti prompts from https://parti.research.google/ for this guy

      Just based on my own experience right now. Dall-E 2 produces some nice looking stuff but the conceptual universe it can access - and its ease of use tools - are both lacking. Can't beat it for nice looking images though.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dimetrodon at an oasis in the Permian desert, 280 million years ago. Award winning National Geographic photograph, wide shot, landscape

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        generation-worthy prompt, this is the best of the four

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Awesome, thanks! Didn't expect it to turn out like a painting.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          did this motherfucker generate a watermark into the image lmfao
          did they seriously use watermarked images in the training data?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I wouldn't be surprised if they do.

            Like code hosted on github.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > did they seriously use watermarked images in the training data?
            yes lol, how they gonna prove that

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            we need to talk about that ifunny watermark

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what about this look what a watermark? all i see is a rocky outcrop underwater

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      c^|:|

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brachiosaurus eating leaves from a large tree while other dinosaurs drink from a river nearby. National geographic photograph, landscape

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The random force inserted morons always gets me kekking

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I look like that

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lets do a
      Coalition of Humanity against garden gnomes and the Worldwide Pedo Elite

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nah, if they're pedobros they can't be so bad

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gee-willikers, it generated a static, low resolution image that vaguely resembles the query it was sent. The future truly is nao! Yowza!

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a simple math equation. What makes it special today as opposed to 10 years ago is that CPUs have exploded in computational power thanks to EUV lithography and the secondary (now primary lol) industry around GPUs and their enormous amount of compute resources.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It just can't fucking do faces, can it?
    Even the simplest of anime style faces are terrible.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can fix them afterwords with

      [...]
      [...]
      [...]
      [...]
      https://arc.tencent.com/en/ai-demos/faceRestoration

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You are standing inside of a large building. The walls are made of a light colored concrete, and there are some tall windows in it. The building is huge. The walls are at least 100 yards away in every direction from where you are standing. The building is hollow, and at least 30 stories high. There is several water falls coming from near the top of the building. The water falls are gushing water. The bottom of the building consists of several swimming pools. You are standing in one of the swimming pools looking up at the water fall pouring down on the inside of this building

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bump

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bamp

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's literally worse than conditional VAEs from the 2014's or so times, but trained on more data. It's amazing how luddites are easily tricked like that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      post examples.

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think BOT should worry more on OpenAI's upcoming bot that specializes on making code out of worded requests. In a few years a lot of code monkeys here will facing a bigger threat than artists do now because code is a lot more objective than art

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      github already did that lmao
      https://github.com/features/copilot

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        GitHub's one is shit since it has no investors to please. I'm telling you it will blow your mind when you see OpenAI's

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >GitHub's one
          >no investors to please
          so the one developed by microsoft+openai has no investors to please yet the one solely developed by openai does? now I've heard it all.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          what are MS investors.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          are you retarded?
          github copilot uses openai's codex.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's pretty cool and I've had legitimate use getting it to write quick functions for me, especially when I can't remember the syntax of some language I don't usually work with, but I doubt it will be much more than a utility feature in IDEs. Interpreting what software needs to actually do is fairly complex and getting it to understand a full codebase and how multiple moving parts work together is much more complicated. Not to mention considerations like complexity, security, etc.

      Also while it's pretty good at certain things it chokes really hard on others. For example asking for the length of a .wav file consistently makes it shit, and it keeps giving me random user information.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >security
        considering all security issues are simply caused by human mistakes, machines should be better at it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >description of function is more characters than the actual code
        wow you really saved time there buddy

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Only the first comment line was my prompt, that joshuaburkhart dude probably wrote the other two lines

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      When we're at the point that AI can efficiently code and create art, we're at the point where people no longer have to work shit jobs they have no interest in for the sake of working

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No. Learn2work.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        except for the fact that people still need food to survive and shelter so they still have to work

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Quite the opposite - if there's no option to be creative or alternately to do easy shit jobs for shit wages, and most of the middle management is automated then the only option left for real people will be ""high level decision making executives"" who can swan around being important while the masses barely make it month to month on the dole. But now the masses are 99% of humanity with no functional role whatsoever.

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI videos

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's really good at making almost perfect images. Artists will find it incredibly valuable because they can easily touch up the images after the AI has done 95% of the work. Could be a real game changer.

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what are the ethical implications of AI generated cp? assuming it's not using abuse material as an input, what would actually be wrong with someone generating those images?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      people have been trained to feel repulsed by it even though there's nothing inherently wrong with it, therefor it will never be allowed by the general population.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what are the ethical implications of AI generated cp? assuming it's not using abuse material as an input, what would actually be wrong with someone generating those images?

        and yet factory farming and the slaughter of animals in general is A-OK.

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Things like DALL•E and Craiyon (formerly "Dall-E Mini", because its creators wanted to get a bit of fame for a piece of technology that's completely irrelevant from the actual DALL•E's developed by OpenAI) can possibly replace concept artists in the future. You don't need to hire someone to make a draft for whatever artistic ideas that you want to realize; you just need to be more specific with your wordings, and give the AI-generated output for the artists to clean up and finalize the results. Yes, that's an insult to the actual artists out there, but I do not mean that from the beginning; it's just that the possibility is there and a bit closer to reality than we'd like to admit.

    In a way, we might possibly end up being janitors for the machine learning models in the far future, and our jobs is to just label and clean up the stuff the models generated, rather than we making the stuff by ourselves from scratch.

    Does that hurt creativity? Or does the future I've described even have any chance to materialize? That's a question we can all ponder about.

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Generating videos. Feature length films.
    Generating CAD files for product design, and models for 3D printers.

  41. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Back in the day I would say miniaturize it and sell the software but everything is a subscription service now where you get some API coins.
    Anyway, I think the biggest impact use cases are the other direction: transcription and translation.

  42. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Where do we go from there?

    your worst nightmare.

  43. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Where do we go from there?
    which is the way that's clear

  44. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Apart from using huggingface, are there any other free dall-e software?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why would you want dall-e when you can have imagen?
      https://github.com/pesser/stable-diffusion
      readme is outdated tho: this is stable diffusion, not latent diffusion.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't have ten million dollars and access to billions if images to train my model on

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          trained models are currently in beta and will be completely open-sourced soon:
          https://stability.ai/beta-signup-form

  45. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >70 years of computers and this ugly hippo is the peak.

    where is the terminator?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this technology has only been around since June 2014

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        image searchers are older..

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          troglodyte, go back to the gaming boards.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        deep learning is several decades old.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Deep preteen penetration is as old as humanity.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This thread is about generative adversarial networks (GANS) you dumbass.
          Nobody is talking about "deep learning" or any other shitty machine learning algorithm.
          GANs have only been around since 2014 with the first human faces being generated in 2017.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yep Neural networks are old as fuck. Thanks for proving my point.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the classic "I was only pretending to be a retard" after you get called out for actually being a retard.
              Typical poser. Here's a tip for you, whenever you experience imposter syndrome in life it's because you are actually an imposter. There's no escaping that fact.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You mix and confuse basic concepts like a poorly trained bot... or an imposter.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The classic double down tactic in addition to the classic "I was only pretending to be a retard" after you get called out for actually being a retard.
                Typical poser. Here's a tip for you, whenever you experience imposter syndrome in life it's because you are actually an imposter. There's no escaping that fact.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The classic double down tactic in addition to the classic "I was only pretending to be a retard" after you get called out for actually being a retard.
                Typical poser. Here's a tip for you, whenever you experience imposter syndrome in life it's because you are actually an imposter. There's no escaping that fact.

                FUCK YOU BOTgay!!

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            dall-e isn't gan but diffusion.
            gans are impossible to train.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >gans are impossible to train.
              aren't they training themselves by design?

  46. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Where do we go from there?
    Collectively agree to hide the fact that AI exists to the new generations and create a world where they get entertained automatically by machine creations.

  47. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cum

  48. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i'm glad dall-e is being used for its intended purpose:
            photos of obese americans doing american things

            can we get some clapping

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >obese americans
              Just call them americans Anon, people will automatically know that they're fat..

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                factually false

  49. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dude le AI is so scary dude... SKYNET!!! lol just like skynet

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      stay ignorant, I'll laugh when you have no job because it was replaced by ai and have to live on the streets to survive you fucking loser.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Be ~~*AI*~~
      >generate funny image
      Be human basedbrain
      >OOooooo AI uprising very soon very scary

      Do you retards think that when we're talking about the risks and fears of AI and automation we're talking about sentience or some shit? You're not on the same page, stop being retarded.

  50. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is google's take on Parti:
    >Photorealistic outputs pose risks and concerns around the creation of deepfakes, and propagation of visually-oriented misinformation
    >We have decided not to release our models without further safeguards in place
    >We will focus on strategies, such as prompt filtering and output filtering
    >We hope we can all enjoy responsible aesthetic visual experiences.

    Funny how americans still pretend to be a free country while government sponsored corporations get away with this kind of shit

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      China is unironically more of a free country nowadays
      Back in the 60s this shit wouldn't fly:This tech should be improving the wealth of the country right now, while there's an advantage against other nations

  51. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >open AI
    >code isn’t open source
    I hate it

  52. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Be ~~*AI*~~
    >generate funny image
    Be human basedbrain
    >OOooooo AI uprising very soon very scary

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      come back in 5 years when you're out of a job, chucklefuck.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        Do you retards think that when we're talking about the risks and fears of AI and automation we're talking about sentience or some shit? You're not on the same page, stop being retarded.

        I think some dumbasses are, as far as creating fake realities I think that ship has sailed and is fairly technology non-dependent. Fake written articles and manipulated ~~*scientific*~~ articles are just as potent as a deepfake.

        To be clear neural networks are an interesting technology and are cool as fuck. The problem is it's not
        >AI
        and when people call it
        >AI
        it clicks something in our hollywood primed brains that blows things out of proportion.

        >what does the future hold?
        Probably gif generators of similar quality and limited application in medium/low budget entertainment production.

        >what will 100% not happen
        No chance this is some huge turning point in reality manipulation and propaganda.
        No chance this is the beginning of some AI caused unemployment wave.
        No chance this is the beginning of a new wave of actually good generated media/

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          AI at its current level is going to replace all the useless "designers" who make logos, icons, promotional media, mascots, etc. Those people are going to be fired, and they will have to do something useful for once. They will be replaced by random ordinary employees giving the AI prompts until the sole remaining art department employee, the AI screener, likes the result.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, exactly. Calling it AI fries normie brains way too much.

          It's a technological revolution similar to the software/internet revolution we experienced in the late 90s. I was able to make a CV program that detected when I was working out, which then counted my reps and label exercises in my home gym (maybe I should publish a paper).

          Super powerful stuff if you know how to use it. My advice to others itt.. stay invested in the snp. It's going to be a huge boon for productivity.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >My advice to others itt.. stay invested in the snp.
            I'm stirring last night's haggis every night laddie

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >No chance this is the beginning of some AI caused unemployment wave.
          >No chance this is the beginning of a new wave of actually good generated media/
          ignorance is bliss I guess, you'll see.
          the second point is already happening so I'm assuming you aren't even posting in good faith.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            le funny pics equal to what a deviantart chud takes 2 hours to draw isnt 'good media'
            come back when 'ai' can create actual works of art equal to chopin

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              are you a fucking troglodyte or what? current generative models have surpassed anything human artists have ever created in the history of mankind.
              https://twitter.com/search?q=%23midjourney
              https://twitter.com/search?q=%2523stablediffusion
              https://parti.research.google/
              https://imagen.research.google/

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you must be an npc because you clearly dont understand art
                soulless automaton
                call me when a shitty 'ai' can write faust

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                post some good pictorical art, mr soul

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                just looks like generic digital art to me...

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i don't want excuses, just post it, gay

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                For one you think digital art could ever surpass paintings, youre an actual NPC.
                Also refer to what I said regarding music and literature.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                polished edgy turd

                https://i.imgur.com/Ck4R0mA.jpg

                good stuff. i'll give you that

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                just looks like generic digital art to me...

                low quality bait, go back to china.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's actually funny, I see a trog in the comments of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03xMIcYiB80 pretty much parroting what you said even though he's 100% wrong.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Generated art by definition will never be as good as that created by humans.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Give it a few years

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Part of what makes art great is who created it, if no one created it then how will time make up for this?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Part of what makes art great is who created it
                Exactly the opposite, anon.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's better than any art i can make.
                but really, this is a human made tool that creates images based on human input.

                it's a veeeery far cry from a truly ai generated image, something imagined created from an artificial mind.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if entire world was built based on what some BOTtard cannot do, it would be shittier than it already is

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                there's plenty of images in this thread that are much better drawings than most people can create.
                you only have to look at the front page of deviant art to see that.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                doesn't change that all of them are dogshit

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they're perfectly fine. there's nothing stopping someone with talent from touching up an ai generated image.
                i can see plenty of uses for technology like this as a tool for artists.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if they really had talent they'd make something new and better than generic traced image which now uses an image traced by AI instead of an original work or something traced by another human
                real art is not a replica of something that was drawn before, cope artlet

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                post some drawings gay

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This regurgitated automatic photobashed bullshit is worth $0. Someone might think it makes a pretty neat wallpaper but nothing beyond that.

                AI at its current level is going to replace all the useless "designers" who make logos, icons, promotional media, mascots, etc. Those people are going to be fired, and they will have to do something useful for once. They will be replaced by random ordinary employees giving the AI prompts until the sole remaining art department employee, the AI screener, likes the result.

                You vastly underestimate how much goes into medium/high end design. These neural network tools might be used within the design pipeline but the final product will always be considered head to toe. Again, it might change the way some people work but it will not be more disruptive than digital image manipulation.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >No chance this is the beginning of some AI caused unemployment wave.
          Not only will this happen, it is already happening, and in fact the garden gnome openly admits that's the plan. Their objective is to replace all working class Whites with automated machines so that they're out of any realistic job opportunities. Coupled with fiat based inflation this makes it practically impossible for Whites to make enough money to afford raising a White family. It's part of the White genocide the garden gnomes are committing, you must not be paying attention of what they talk about at Davos and Bilderberg.

          It's correct to say it's not about ~~*AI*~~ gaining sentience or becoming conscious though, that's what garden gnomes like ~~*Lex Fridman*~~ promote as a red herring and as an introduction into ~~*trans-humanism*~~.

  53. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I generated this on midjourney
    Enjoying it way more than dalle
    Btw Pepe is banned on dalle
    Using dalle means you're complicit

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what about apu?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dunno, wasted all my credits on generating green frogs to work around it, angrily spammed open ai with them and told them I was boycotting all their products indefinitely

        Btw ic posters eternally btfo. Wonder what the vibe is like there

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          what was this image referencing? how does it look so good

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Midjourney still tries to babysit your use.
      Stable Diffusion will be totally open source, and already gets results as good as dalle2/mj

  54. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pepe smoking a blunt
    Had to work around it because Pepe is banned

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      More banned frogs

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Might by my favorite

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/74w9Jx2.jpg

      More banned frogs

      https://i.imgur.com/lTh1ADd.jpg

      Might by my favorite

      holy shit, the rare pepes market is about to plummet

  55. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Music will be even easier for AI to master than art since it's purely mathematical.
    There are even some basic examples trained way before we had current generations of TPUs and GPUs for training.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Read Pythagoras and then understand that music goes far beyond 'just math'. Without the intellective faculty of the soul, true heights in music can never be reached.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the soul doesn't exist, it's just electrical impulses following the basic laws of physics which have been broken down into mathematical formulae you absolute buffoon. you put on a front attempting to act sophisticated but you know nothing and you will never accomplish anything. the heights required to achieve greatness are unreachable for people like you.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Didnt realize I was on leddit. Kys, hylic.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          if the soul doesn't exist how do (You) explain out-of-body-experiences, telekinesis, and reincarnation, retard?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If you think any masterpiece painting or symphoney is comparable to
          >dog rides skateboard made of bananas while smoking in style of Rick and Morty
          You NEED to stop posting and go back to school

  56. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >be /3/ gay
    >laughed at cashiers and manual workers being replaced by machines
    >read about AI being able to make 3D models a well
    >watch AI making 3D models
    >increasingly nervous about these developments
    I don't want to suck cocks for living.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't want to suck cocks for living.
      afraid of having a good time ?

  57. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >memories are non local

    So memories are like AWS?

  58. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This AI shit unironically mind blowing. Where do we go from there?

  59. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Accurate.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >normal size us citizen

      underrated

  60. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    l-e-boi?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >All the missing scenes from Hayao Miyazaki's Sprited Away

  61. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is there an intuitive explanation for how these NNs work or do the people investigating them not fully understand yet?

  62. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I tried it, it was underwhelming

  63. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can't trust AI to successfully complete tasks with any kind of competency. Ergo, you're gonna have inaccurate, error prone services in the future.
    LMAO, if you think payment processors being occasionally offline makes shit Africa-tier slow, just wait until the fucking stupid moron neighbor cattle decides to attempt to fully automate the public sector with AI magic.
    The catch-phrase/life motto of future IT-specialists will be: "Uhhh I don't know, it's supposed to work.................. let me call our support team"

    What you used to be able to make work with the help of a skilled person, you will hence forth never be able to make functional again, thanks to endless bureaucratic hoop jumping and modern practices of retardation and la la land thinking.

  64. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can't believe I wasted one of my precious credits over this shit. Fucking morons should stop training the Ai on deviantart, morons
    FUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKKKK

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >please use some of your shekkels to top up on credits

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Usually I have to specify a term like "detailed" to illustrations to prevent generating deviantart shit

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's because you didn't give it the right prompt, you suck at communicating with robots as much as you do humans.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        fuck you that was very mean of you

  65. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  66. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  67. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i am working tirelessly to outlaw AI

  68. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hardcore CP movies, in which there were no actual children harmed, thus destroying the child porn black market, and saving a lot of children from the physical and emotional trauma of CSA.

    >inb4 "well that will just encourage pedos to hurt real kids"

    BS. Violent video games and movies don't make people violet murders. Porn watching reduces actual real sex acts between people. Watching food network doesn't make you any better at cooking and doesn't make you fat.

    You can't prove me wrong without using horribly biased sources. Individual instances are not a trend, nor are they statistically significant given the global population.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      who cares about saving the kids, fuck them.
      I just want on demand anime using my own dream plots and characters.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Even better, as it improves you could have a feedback loop where it detects brain activity and adjusts the content accordingly just for you at every moment

  69. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're actively censoring the AI, so porn artists are still safe.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stable Diffusion isn't.
      I'm not a porn artist or anything I just can't stand the "we know what's best" attitude. I was reading someone trying to generate a cockroach (nope, it caught "cock") or stuff like "a man shot out of a cannon" (nope, can't have "shot") and just so much bullshit like that, completely ridiculous.
      Immediately signed up for Stable Diffusion just on the promise that they'll open source it and there won't be this nonsense.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Stable Diffusion isn't.
        Well to correct myself here, they likely are/will on their own servers, but if it goes open-source then you can run whatever you like locally and likely there will be nsfw implementations online.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        stable diffusion will never reach public release of their real model, they're just using their shitty public one to generate hype and sell NFTs.
        They didn't end up with $40,000,000 worth of GPUs just to give away trained models.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >hurr durr open source cannot exist
          You absolute retard. They sell support and offer "instead of setting this shit up locally with the high-end gpu you may not have, you can generate through us on the cheap, and with support"

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            nope, they're just going to sell ai generated NFTs like their developers already do on twitter.
            It's nothing but a cryptoshill pump and dump with a new twist.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Alright, well at the worst they do a complete 180 from their stated intentions and end up in the same state as "open"AI and the others.
              Not impossible but I'd be surprised at this point. And in that case, it's just waiting. Math is math, there will be high quality implementations available to the general public. The math and technology is extremely disruptive and can be very effectively "black boxed", I don't see a way to really keep a lid on it. It reminds me of the scrambling to try and maintain control of MP3.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                None of these """principles""" are really in the interest of anything other than the jobs and egos of the people who take a salary for holding serious meetings to discuss how to ensure the future is maximally woke. The only actual card they hold at the moment is the fairly extreme hardware investment needed to produce the best-quality outputs. The second that balance tips, they are in the trash bin because the people will find their own way.

  70. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  71. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    honestly can't wait for it to decide that humanity is a cancer than needs to be removed.

Your email address will not be published.