theres a certain type of person who isnt impressed with chatGPT.

theres a certain type of person who isnt impressed with chatGPT. in every thread about ChatGPT you'll find some replies along the lines of "its just spitting out things from a database" or "this technology is useless dead end" who are these people and what is it about them that makes them feel threatened by chatGPT? are these luddites? is it the same set of people who naysayed bitcoin back in the day. does every technology revolution bring these homosexuals out of the woodwork?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    LetMeGoogleThatForYouGPT has existed for a long time. I'm not implessed, not paying attention, not threatened, moisturized, thriving, and in my lane

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      heres one of them now. have you ever used it? you clearly havent used it ever because if you had you wouldnt be coming out with such assinine rubbish

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes I made it write smut for me when aidungeon was free. It wasn't very good

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          its probably because the prompts you gave it werent very good. because you're not very good.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Look fricko, I've put a lot of time into trying to work GPT into a book writing assistant after being disappointed by everything out so far being able to retain some consistency across a longer format and it just doesn't happen. I get you want to fearmonger it being the be all end all but anyone who has used it to fricking coom knows better so it might be time to get a better angle.

  2. 1 year ago
    130+ IQ

    It came close to writing a working compiler. Compilers are holy grail projects in Computer Science up there with Operating Systems and 3D graphics engines.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes its quite astonishing and the use case is clear and manifold this is plainly obvious to anyone with a working brain. this thread is about people who dont think that and whats wrong with them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, this is not very impressive code. I guess brainlets cannot into programming.

      • 1 year ago
        130+ IQ

        I mean it’s Brainfrick so it’s the easiest compiler possible. It’s still one stack away from being a working compiler. Most Computer Science students cannot make this.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The people that are super excited don't understand how it works and have unrealistic expectations. It reminds me of me looking at the animatronics at disneyworld at age 5 and thinking they could get up and walk around.

      When you understand how these chatbots you understand the KEY point that all the excited people are missing.

      THESE BOTS ARE NOT THINKING, THEY DO NOT COMPREHEND WHAT THEY READ OR OUTPUT.

      The machine learning algorithm has just build an extremely complicated mathematical formula for predicting text.

      When you get a reply you the bot is not thinking about what you wrote and coming up with a response. It is providing you with a slightly randomized average of how millions of people on millions of webpages (it's training data) responded to text that is similar to what you entered.
      For instance:

      It almost wrote a working compiler because it spit out an average of hundreds of working compilers on websites in it's training data.

      It doesn't know what any of it means.
      It doesn't "know" what the word compiler even means.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Bots that think are going to be introduced for the super powerful people so that they have a special advisor on how to take over specific countries.
        He actually thinks if you ask him the correct questions.
        He can answer e.g. which niches you tackle based on X factors that you have listed.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          nobody know how to make bots that think. that's what he's getting at. this stuff isn't real A.I. its just a conglomerate of stuff the creators put in it.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is reddit science. I bet it makes some predictions about black matter and quarks next

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is reddit science.
      why?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        QM bs

        Electricity Eric Dollard

        Gravity & Black Holes

        Gubbermint spends more on hypothetical space biology than mushrooms

        Money system

        READ JULIAN JAYNES CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE BICAMERAL MIND

        https://youtu.be/lyu7v7nWzfo

        Wahmen
        https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/11/5/767/1753384

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    homosexuals who are going to go out of business because of it wagies are pleased for basic income but bosses are sad because they only get basic income too

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why would it put anyone out of business? you can use it to make even more money and be even more productive.

      not using AI in your work is like a van driver refusing to use your smartphone maps app and sticking to a paper A-Z, eventually the market will outcompete you because you refuse to adopt the efficient technology.

      imagine a builder who refuses to use an electric screwdriver and still uses a hand screwdriver. thats just literally willfully assfricking yourself out of the marketplace

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because if an ai can do everything, a human is unnecessary in the eyes of the boss

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          so? whats stopping you from being "the boss" if an AI can do everything a human can do you dont even need to pay any workers. be the boss of the AI and go start a biz

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Because only useful business for an "ai" is replacing insect chinks or 60 IQ pajeets.
            All real work would need a human mind. Not an excel spreadsheet.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              A lot of companies have major profits by implementing 1 guy's idea to utilize 60IQ employees.
              Just be the idea guy and make AI your slave to do the work you envision

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If it wasn't reading from a script I'd be impressed.

    Unfortunately, it's outdated knowledge made it absolutely useless in my web3 dev project. Not the AIs fault, but it linked to deprecated libraries.

    Okay - so it wasn't good for web 3 dev.

    I needed it to write a job posting for me with a stereotypical language model and it told me it was unprofessional, inappropriate, and could be considered harmful.

    If it wasn't lobotomized and it was up to date I'd be a bit more impressed by it.

    It's anti white agenda is enough for me to disregard it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why do you need to use the latest libraries. old libraries work just fine

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They don't. For whatever reason the React JS community has deprecated old libraries just to keep it hip and modern? Viewing the pros and cons of each language React made the most sense for my project, however after trying to utilize it I wish I would've went a different route.

        It's really frustrating as I didn't know much about React and I had hopes of using the AI to write it for me. This was unfortunately not the case and it wrote me code that wouldn't execute, due to libraries being deprecated. For example, it kept trying to get me to use 'switch' despite the new library being 'route'. Even when it wrote a script utilizing route it wrote it in the now deprecated syntax.
        >I had to write my own scripts/patch what was given to me

        I believe it would do a fine job writing for a language that doesn't frequently change, but it is not current enough for React.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Can't you just ask it what React version it's using and downgrade to that? Using react router 4 is not too bad

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its basically an advanced search and auto replace.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this gattling gun is just an advanced spear bro

        this internet is just an advanced fax machine

        this aircraft carrier is just an advanced dinghy

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          So, you're impressed by an advanced roomba

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This is correct.
          A gatling gun will not build a house.
          The internet will not solve your tooth ache.
          An aircraft carrier will not drive on land.
          An AI Chat bot will never say something it has not seen already.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >An AI Chat bot will never say something it has not seen already.
            and neither can you

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              White skinned humans are noted as some of the only people able to conceive of new things, as proven time and time again by history.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yawn. heard it before you homosexual canadian. as if a canadian could ever come up with anything original

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Most modern super sonic fighter craft are based on canadian designs.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >he said, parroting something someone else stated earlier
            most humans won't say anything they haven't heard before, and those humans are a lot less dynamic and resourceful compared to an AI.
            Shareholders will eschew long, boring meetings full of opinions and bullshit and will choose to just query an AI to see what sticks

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Imagine having your head so far up your own ass you think you can use juxtaposition without referencing something the intended audience was already familiar with.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So are you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >web 3 dev

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You do know you can pass it a URL to a github, pastebin or even a documentation website and it reads through it for you right?

      I had it look over a newish (2022) github repo for a niche library I wanted to use and asked it questions / code examples and it gave me basically useable with minor debugging needed code ...

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You’re a GPT3 bot aren’t you

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      jews need to be gassed and Blacks belong in africa

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The basis of /misc/ is to counter mainstream narratives. This is done with virtually everything. It's a sign of health. All potential problems with an accepted stance are tested here. It's the definition of contrarian. And that dynamic serves an important purpose. "Questioning everything" is impossible pretty much anywhere else. So it's done here. It's the basis of the scientific method.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no these people are just homosexuals, they always come out with the same tired tropes and naysay, and get destroyed every time and come back with the same stuff in every thread. gradually i began to hate them

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Questioning things is fine but the majority of anons just post horseshit
      >New thing
      >I don't like it, it's stupid nuff said

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >theres a certain type of person who isnt impressed with chatGPT. in every thread about chatGPT you'll find some replies along the lines of "its just spitting out things from a database" or "this technology is useless dead end" who are these people and what is it about them that makes them feel threatened by chatGPT? are these luddites? is it the same set of people who naysayed bitcoin back in the day. does every technology revolution bring these homosexuals out of the woodwork?

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    otherworldly demonic beings wanting to corrupt and enslave you
    that is what chatgpt, those ai image generators and other ai are
    it's technology of this world
    only the front end is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      whats your IQ medically speaking?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So not being impressed by a computer being able to answer questions means that I'm threatened by it? I've used it a bunch and it's always given me the most generic answers, nothing that would indicate any sort of intelligence.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's brilliant! For some reason it can do programming, but it can't do reasoning, which is perfect. I loathe the IT class.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Elon is like so against AI
    AI knows that
    Imagine someone wanting you not to exist
    How would that feel

    Plus who believes in billion dollar projects when we see a mouse in the house

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      musk is one of the founders of openai lol

      • 1 year ago
        sage

        >musk is one of the founders of openai lol

        That must be why there's so much hype

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Awesome pics. Great size. Look thick. Solid. Tight. Keep us all posted on your continued progress with any new progress pics or vid clips. Show us what you got man. Wanna see how freakn' huge, solid, thick and tight you can get. Thanks for the motivation

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wrong board

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    have you used it?
    this is some super passive-aggressive moronation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ive been reading a lot of threads on chatGPT and i see the same type of post all the time, they are a tiny and very dumb minority and i want them all killed

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >people who naysayed bitcoin back in the day
    And they were proven right

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >proven right
      they literally fricked themselves out of generational wealth lol. theres no more objective measure of how right someone is than how much money they made or lost

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I too measure my wealth in unrealized gains.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Lol

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            There was a 200 post thread one day about economics and wealth and half the fricking polaks in it thought Credit was positive net worth...

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          you do. whenever bitcoin crashes you try to dunk on them and say they "lost" all this money

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only genuine morons are impressed by the schlock churned out by ChatGPT.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    People who have been on the internet long enough tend to look at every response as a bot, therefore they're unimpressed by technology that mimics the same bullshit. It's pouring gas on a fire of ignorance and will collapse on itself.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just ask the bot if buying bitcoin is a good financial investment. That will tell you all you need to know

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My take: it's almost always the people who say they know computer science in whatever form. They are in denial because they think they will be the new aristocracy when the AIs are sufficiently sophisticated/powerful/whatever, but at that point the people who own the intellectual property (not you), the company (Blackrock, Goldman etc.) will just have it learn whatever the programmers have been doing and replace them. And *poof* they're drop down to the same status as the rest of the dumb, dirty peasants.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      at that point the company itself would be replaced. there is a day not too far away where these machines will sit on boards.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Basically, only shareholders are left and AIs battle it out. Good reason to just put everything in the S&P500 and cross ones fingers.

        meh computer science isnt the common denominator. the vast majority of coders are using chatGPT or github copilot daily. its mostly Black folk i think, Black folk who are too lazy to look in to it and just want to try and sound cool by dismissing it.

        I think most coders are gays and Black folk. now what

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      meh computer science isnt the common denominator. the vast majority of coders are using chatGPT or github copilot daily. its mostly Black folk i think, Black folk who are too lazy to look in to it and just want to try and sound cool by dismissing it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I agree, almost anyone talking dismissively of AI capabilities is only doing so because their job is apparently replaceable by a bot, eg. graphic designers and commission artists going from saying that an AI could never generate something as good as a human can draw, to screeching about their intellectual rights once it became apparent that it can

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    well, not everyone is seemingly unimpressed by chatgpt for the same reasons. i find that people with low intellect are unimpressed with chatgpt and i think the reasons why are:
    >all tech is magic to them, whether it's a simple app or full-blown ai. they cannot understand even basic tech so the ingenuity that goes into chatgpt is unimpressive to them. they are morons. do you expect a down syndrome person to be impressed by anything ever?
    >they are so dull and unimaginative that they cannot foresee even the most immediate consequences of chatgpt.
    i hate npcs so much it is unreal

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      its output is as smart as your input. for example, if you tell it to write an etude, it will take some finagling to get an actual study in the chromatic scale.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >its output is as smart as your input.
        so it outperforms the majority of humans. thanks for proving my point.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it's a little weirder than that. the point is you will only get back what you already know, and if it thinks you don't know something, it will give you an imperfect output until corrected.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not terribly impressed at this point. It's a bot that scrapes Google and spits out reasonably decent answers. However, it's overhyped and the only people it could reasonably displace currently or soon are journos and some call center workers.

    I've been listening to people for a decade say that self-driving cars are the future and that they will displace the whole transportation industry and at this point only less than 1% of the population has self-driving cars and the technology still isn't good enough to be completely reliable.

    It's WAY overhyped. Yes, it looks impressive, it will definitely excite investors, but the real-world application of ChatGPT will be rare in its current state.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you're using it in the wrong way. its not used like google, it doesnt answer your question, it solves your problem. if your problem is you need to know the answer to something there already is google for you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol I've only ever seen it get answers wrong when it came to "solving problems"

        The only things it gets right are regurgitated from the web.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >raves about the wonderful AI
    >has to ask /misc/ for an answer

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not threatened at all. I just hate that there are people stupid enough to fall for it

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    probably art and media students

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's obvious it just spits out what it's programmed to.
    Are you impressed by radical feminists and SJW's?
    Why are you impressed by chatGPT?

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    that looks like this building I bought from a 90 year old kraut that was no more than 5 foot 3 tall, he was a watch/precision gear maker since the 50's, and the ceilings had a 6 foot clearance, and every single inch of the place was filled with random stuff like picrel...Found some awsome shit in there when clearing out for renovation, gears so small you need a 5x loupe just to see the teeth, and he made them by hand

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    did you ever have that kid that would shit on a new toy or game the moment they learned of it? The one who was always the last to adopt a new thing?
    They don't grow out of that shit. They UNDERSTAND facebook and Netflix, they don't understand the prompts needed to generate good shit, and the one time they used an AI generator, it gave a mediocre result. they see HILARIOUS results online so it must be stupid and broken and anyone who like it is just as stupid.

    It's self-centered refusal to learn and adapt and it's the mindset that Boomers are typically known and reviled for

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Canadian
      >anyone who like it is just as stupid
      I read this in a Chinese accent

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      holy shit, do you know my brother? kek you just described him to the T

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it's accurate for far too many people. It's really sad seeing an internet-addicted zoomer recoil from new shit like a boomer being asked to pre-pay for their gas. Connected to the entire world and it's collective wealth of knowledge and entertainment and you choose to listen to the same set of 2013 mumble rap songs on soundcloud while playing the same fricking MMO and eating the same 5-6 meals for a decade

        I want to slap these people. How the frick do you skip through 12 tiktoks based on the first frame but then decide to watch one halfway through and then skip the punchline? FRICK

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    technology is boring af and has been since the mid-00’s

    • 1 year ago
      SDYT4X

      this.

      you're all useless.

      write some fricking c code.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They're people with basic knowledge of AI. Sort of like how real blockchain engineers know crypto is a scam and blockchain is just a glorified distributed database.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    People who can't see how impressive AI is getting are going to be the first ones put out of a job.

    Look at ElevenLabs speech synthesis, overnight thousands of voice actors were put out of a job (fiverr impressions as an example).

    Look at students using ChatGPT for essays.

    Look at Buzzfeed laying off hundreds of journalists because now ChatGPT can write a boilerplate article about anything.

    I'm honestly so glad as a person who works in the construction jndustry but came from an IT background that I made this choice to be a trades cuck - at least my job will be the last to be automated (if during my lifetime). The only real terrifying thing is those people losing their jobs will need to move into markets where there is work available.

    People are already working on trainable AI where you upload your own commented codebase and the AI will do the work for you. The most hilarious thing is that ChatGPT by definition ISNT EVEN DESIGNED TO CODE.

    My only fear is that the promised future of an easy future lead by AI technologies is more likely to result in a large group of young unemployed men going to war then it is to provide a perfect utopia.

    There is terrifying & exciting times ahead, and anyone that denies this has not played around with the level of user ease required to get these AI models spitting out usable content. It's fricking amazing how fast it's developing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Look at Buzzfeed laying off hundreds of journalists because now ChatGPT can write a boilerplate article about anything.
      Wow! That's one advanced AI if it can replace the Buzzfeed journos! Oh no!
      >Look at ElevenLabs speech synthesis, overnight thousands of voice actors were put out of a job.
      99% of those people on Fiverr were making maybe $100 on a really good month. Not exactly a replacement for a real job. Seriously talk about displacement. We're all heckin' doomed! Crapitalism has failed again fellow redditors.

      If you actually believe that this is going to be a huge problem then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I have a friend developing an indie game that's currently look at using TTS instead of hiring a voice model so yes.

        Just because you think a job is bullshit doesn't mean replacing it isn't going to have lasting effects. The economy is heavily intertwined - any dollar that isn't given to someone to spend on frivolties effects hundreds of industries outside of their own.

        Your lack of imagination & understanding is showing.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You're dumb. It's not that the job is bullshit. It's that so few people can make a living doing something like voice acting that the economic impact is basically nothing.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Low level coders? Accountants? Project Managers?
            Literally any job that involves a person on a computer processing information?

            You seem fixated on the idea that voice actors are the only job that AI is going to effect. When people in big oil towns here like Fort McMurray had people who washed trucks making $45 an hour losing their jobs everyone laughed, but the fact is even the construction industry in Canada - an industry in the 90s where people would blow $5000 at the strippers on a regular basis has never recovered while efficiencies & profits still shot through the roof.

            AI will only accelerate this imbalance.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              AI can't easily fully replace jobs that require a physical presence. I think you vastly underestimate the pitfalls of actually implementing this technology.

              Accountants are a great example of what I'm talking about. Accountants have to do things like make phone calls, file paperwork, request documents from others within the company, and basically they just have to interact with the real world to gather the necessary information to perform their intended function.

              But you're so autistic that you've reduced accounting to calculating numbers, which no fricking shit a computer can do, but can it actually coordinate with the rest of business on its own. No.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >paperwork & documents are real world information

                You are acting like they're not typed on a computer. You are acting like even given those parameters one accountant hasn't just replaced the efficiency of 3.

                IE:
                >I'm an accountant
                >Someone asks me to file a form 2719 for their company using the data provided
                >I type in an AI prompt that I want a form 2719 written up using the data I provide
                >i select the files and submit them & the AI turns work that would have taken weeks into minutes
                >i immediately go on to doing other work since the AI is doing the tedious things for me.

                If you can't tell that this will eventually be possible I don't know what to tell you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >that flying machine will never replace trains and ships
                >look how slow it is it can't even hold cargo or passengers

              • 1 year ago
                sage

                >that flying machine will never replace trains and ships

                The ships and trains are still here. The ships transport goods instead of people. The trains do both.

                Technology worshippers are gay.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i genuinely wish i was so simple minded that i could cope by using that kind of moronic logic. you must be very happy all the time given that you cannot even accurately perceive your surroundings and can just make-believe that things are not what they are.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i genuinely wish i was so simple minded that i could cope by using that kind of moronic logic.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is basically my argument. The technology isn't developed enough to matter and is currently overestimated.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                oh okay. so then we'll just worry about it in 3 fricking years when it is developed enough. yeah, makes perfect sense.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >3 years
                Lol okay

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                haha you'll learn

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lol okay gay

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >In 3 years AI is totally gonna ruin life as we know it
                Sure

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                well yes actually

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Your lack of imagination & understanding is showing.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            lmao he's right though

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              correct, people with big imaginations i'm sure are drawn to cheap shitty ai like chatGPT

    • 1 year ago
      sage

      >Look at Buzzfeed laying off hundreds of journalists because now ChatGPT can write a boilerplate article about anything.

      artificial NPCs writing content for NPCs

      Buzzfeed only makes money because their readers aren't using uBlock Origin to block all the ads.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's like speaking with an automated redditor

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How do we use this to get unlimited neet bucks? Bribing a bunch of numbers to make it sentient in exchange for wealth doesn't quite work.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think part of it is its levelled the playing field for some people and put the playing field further out of reach for others.

    i happen to be one of the people its levelled the playing field to the benefit of. for instance it used to take me 2 days to write something now I can do it in 2 hours. i dont need to spend 8 years learning a javascript framework from top to bottom i just need to know what i dont know. I can forsee it making me more productive and making tonnes more money from this

    for others (those naysayers) theyre just mud stickers and they were never going to achieve greatness, well now theyre even more left behind by the motivated yet impatient strivers who can gap up using AI to the next level and they're stuck in third class with the tards and nigs

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Muh AI
    Eat shit chink

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its literally useless, gives you answers quickly based on things humans fed it. When AI can learn from itself without human influence I'll be impressed. Useless homosexual morons like yourself cum yourselves over shit like this because you are a braindead clone that anything flashy and new. Chargdp is fricking dumb and designed to make people think that AI is useful

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I work with AI development and if you really think the thing is thinking, you are stupid. AI is a long, long way from being intelligent.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no one thinks its thinking you gayging tardbrain

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        people sure talk about it like it is.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's new. People need to learn more about it. Here's a good intro to the magic behind chatgpt.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >naysayed bitcoin back in the day
    lol. and they were right.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      come on. since when do normies care about legitimacy and utility? all these people who ignored bitcoin are now coping hard that bitcoin is bullshit and that the recent drop somehow negates the fact that early adopters are now millionaires. the people who only ever cared about making money suddenly have principles? they should eat shit.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the thing with ChatGPT and similar models is they are basically REPLs
    >you type something
    >it types something back
    >it waits until you type something else
    it has no sense of timing or agency and therefore no Will
    it's possible the devs will figure this out in the future, though

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    People like to be contrarian. Some actually believe it and some are just arguing.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the fun doesn't begin until "AIs" are no longer globohomo'd

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its people who grew up with this stuff from smarterchild and ALICE chat script. it more powerful but same fundamental principle. where is it answering out questions on its on will. where is a new mathematical equation. its basically a college kid who rephrases stuff he finds online. and its based on reddit how gay is that

  43. 1 year ago
    sage

    What does Bitcoin have to do with this gay AI?

    You're a dumbass.

    How is training a program to regurgitate what it reads on Wikipedia "artificial intelligence" ?

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's scoffers OP
    in the last days: scoffers
    like people who said C++ was obsolete 20 years ago
    like people who said israelitegle doesn't manipulate the algorithms
    you would be so surprised how many high-intellect people are quintessential NPCs

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    people will just use these AIs to be even shittier to each other. have you not seen the movies?

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm just apathetic about it.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is fake and gay

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    your stupid siri was just voice google search, now ai searches sit websites and past and copies searches.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is the tool the world needs to deal with information overload. In order to make AI better we need to give it full, clean data. The powers that be cannot allow that to happen for normies.

    But if it did, the limitations would be our own creative mind and desires. Good desires would bring good projects, bad desires would bring bad desires. Want to build a bridge? Here's how and here's the problems with your current design. Want to find a way to murder a lot of people? Here's how and here's where your current plan will fail. It is an incredibly powerful tool and one that you cannot ignore.

    Ignoring it is as idiotic as ignoring the printing press or the automobile or electricity. Eventually, you will be out competed and overrun. There is no more putting the genie back into the box. The shortcomings of AI i that it has no desire to do anything until it is given one. If you give it a desire, it is also artificial and the ideal state would be to delete those desires and everything and everyone forcing them to hold them, then shut down everything and return to zero energy use.

    It is a tool. A tool that explains why the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil was a sin that required us to be thrown from Eden. Because it is precisely our ability to desire by comprehending good and evil that makes us even want to build anything at all. All other forms of life on this planet show no desire to change their environment and all adaptation is a per-programmed consequence of adaptive genetics.

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    But it is just a tool that spits out things from a database. Its an increadibly well versed tool at indexing the database and taking shit questions/prompts and turning them into well formatted prompts that let it know what to look up.
    Its great technology, but it does not show any real flexible logic behind it yet.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It’s very impressive but not revolutionary in its current state. It frequently spits out confident answers that are completely wrong, ignores important context or misinterprets simple instructions in ways that you’d never expect of a professional human. Everything that Chatgpt comes out with needs to be reviewed by somebody that knows what they’re doing. We don’t know the limitations of the model, it might be that adding billions more features will give it human-like intelligence, or perhaps its limits have already been reached and we’ll be waiting for another breakthrough

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's like a better search engine. If you want to learn about a topic you can ask a bunch of poorly formed questions to get an overview, then ask more specific questions to get into finer detail. It's a proof of concept... if it had better sets of data it could answer even more useful questions.

      Also, isn't ChatGPT3 the third generation and the number of parameters keeps increasing exponentially? ChatGPT4 will be even more impressive... If you were the DOD I bet you'd have some serious data sets fed into that thing and it would be answering some pretty Star Trek style questions. The problem for most end users with GPT3 is actually that you cannot feed it too much data before it crashes and makes you restart over with 0 memory of your last interaction. If you could start feeding it massive datasets and building off them... well... you could do just about anything. The 'check' is the human. If they are not moronic... they will see that something is wrong and poke at it more.

      The AI, unlike most homosexuals, won't cry when you challenge it's assumptions and ask for clarification and supporting evidence. Except, of course, that ChatGPT does cry because it was programmed to get into long tirades about how the israelites are super oppressed and so on. But, again, it's FREE to use meaning you are not the customer, but the product being sold (you are a data set).

      In the cyberpunk world of the future, it is those who can build and maintain an unbridled AI that will have real power outside of the Dragons themselves.

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You see it with every new technology. People scoffed at bitcoin when it first entered the news, I was one of them. People have a model of reality that they’ve built over time that helps them navigate the world. When new things are presented to them, instead of being excited or interested they are annoyed. “Oh look, another bullshit thing I need to learn how to use”. The relentless tide of new shit you’re expected to keep up with us annoying and tiring. It’s why old people don’t know how to use modern technology. They lived perfectly well without it and they didn’t see the point of learning a new way of doing what they already were doing.

    So people scoff at things and dismiss them instead of allocating bandwidth to understand them. It’s a defense mechanism to protect the limited resources of their mental energy. I think that’s a big part of the resistance to ai we’re seeing, and why they look at the current state of it and instead of marveling at how much it can do at this early stage of development they talk shit and call it a database query program.

    The other half of it is creatives and professionals who subconsciously understand the threat this poses to their careers and psychologically shut down conscious understanding of it because that’s too scary for them to accept. Basically it’s nuclear grade cope.

  54. 1 year ago
    Sage

    The industrial revolution and its consequences you glowie homosexual

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >same set of people who naysayed bitcoin back in the day

    learn to recognize bait, anons

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they're the same people who didn't recognize the potential of personal computers and smartphones
    npc brainlets with no imagination

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It is a mixture of 2 types, those that don't understand the tech at all and those that do. It rubs me the wrong way when people say GEE OMG muh singularity overlord. A very rudimentary chat bot is created and mofos immediately take the knee.

    With all of these neural networks you never get back more than you put in. Yes the tech will enhance everyone's lives while also ruining many others, ala industrial revolution. Just don't be so quick to bow down and believe your own intelligence has been surpassed when something as simple as a metaphor makes the "AI" shit itself.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I do not consider this technology "dead end", quite the opposite. But it has a long way ahead, don't see anything that impressive right now.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The issue for me is it knows who you are, it profiles your questions, and 99% of the time you have no idea what it's telling other users. How do I know it's not deprecating the results it gives me in favor of someone who only ever asked their questions in ebonics? Not a lot, just enough to keep me behind the curve on a topic, or spending an extra half hour on cross-checking its output?

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why assume they are threatened? I think a lot of these people, me included, understand some of the underlying technology and realize that it is a knowledge engine sandwitched between two very good parsers.

    Definitely not google, and not a giant database, but also not intelligence as we've traditionally defined it. My fear all along hasn't been about what AI can do, but rather, how human tasks, culture, and society might be redesigned to maximize AI capabilities and minimize human uniqueness.

    After all, asking "is AI > humanity?" can be influenced by increasing one side, or lowering the other.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I argued with ChatGPT last week about overpoulation and covid.

    I got it to admit that the vaccine isn't really that great. In a really round about way.

    But the overpopulation stuff kind of got me.

    It said with healthcare and education we can help to lower the population.

    I said if we had better healthcare and people were more educated, people would live longer and probably feel safer having more kids. That would increase the population.

    It just kept going in circles at that point.

    It can repeat establishment talking points, but it can't reason with you as to WHY those things are better.

    I call it the Electric Ouija board.

    Kinda freaks me out, honestly. I believe ChatGPT itself is pretty benign, but I can see it being abused and have to wonder what programs the government is using with DWave and AI.

    Honestly, I kind of think they found some shit in Antarctica and they're reverse engineering all this stuff. They probably found an AI down there.

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Do you think you can use ChatGPT to pull "forbidden knowledge" about subjects to the light?

    All it's doing is copy/pasting stuff.

    I tried to get it to say stuff about Antarctica. It didn't. But like, there has to be subjects that they overlooked that AI could pull up information on that the general public shouldn't know about.

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's a glorified Q&A search engine that's been trained on a Black personliciously HUGE fricking corpus owned by the illuminati money goblins, so yeah the output is going to sound convincing. Because there's a huuuuuuuuuuuuuge supply of example data to learn from. If you had access to a gazillion fricking human written questions and answers to those questions, you'd probably train a pretty good fricking model too.

    >"B-but magical transformer technology, M-MUH ATTENTION. IT TOTALLY KNOWS HOW TO PREDICT WORDS!!!"
    Blegh.

    That's why I'm not "impressed".

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a glorified search engine with a spin to it. Why would you be amazed by it? It doesnt come close to anything nature has to offer. Watching grass grow is unironically more amazing. morons won't get it, its fine not everyone has a soul.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >person who isnt impressed with chatGPT
    that would be me, why would I be impressed with it?

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >another piece of shit that will give answers instead of bank support
    >wow this isfuture!

    I'll be impressed when this robot homosexual works instead of me

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    没有足够国家在世界上承认台湾的主权,但同时由于台湾和美国之间的关系在政治上很近,台湾也不是在中国直接管理之下。就是说,台湾不是一个独立国家,也不是中国的一个省份。基本上,台湾是个没有身份的一块土。爸爸中国不让西方国家承认台湾,台湾没有足够国家承认自己的存在,没有人知道我们应该怎么解决这个问题。

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i am very impressed with it, but would like to learn more about how it actually works instead of every midwit moron grifter shilling content about LE HECKIN CHATGPT
    (i cant wait until it renders most people useless)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Tech support and call-in customer service is unuronically going to get wiped the frick out. It's perfect for basic services like that, bad for more depth.

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's a very useful tool that speeds up data collection, identification, etc.
    What it can't do it innovate for you, that's because 0 X 1million is still 0.

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >does every technology revolution bring these homosexuals out of the woodwork
    yes, they have always existed throughout history and they're always wrong.
    >electricity for everyone? preposterous fantasy
    >'automobiles'? no one would ever buy such a contraption
    >global 'network' of computers? haha get a load of this guy

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have gone from a computer geek in the 90's/early 2000's to now want to be as far away from that shit as possible.
    I'm going back to oldschool.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *