The next time someone starts talking about AI I'm just going to punch them in the face. I can't take it anymore.
The next time someone starts talking about AI I'm just going to punch them in the face.
The next time someone starts talking about AI I'm just going to punch them in the face. I can't take it anymore.
>them
I thought Americans were supposed to be asleep
I'm from Abkhazia
Sounds made up but I believe you
What is the appropriate pronoun in this case?
him
Learn English.
>someone is at my door
>let THEM in
This is proper English and has always been in use, pre-gayry. Stop this turbo autism.
>using plural pronoun for a single person is proper English
Lol no chud
Listen you two gays, I don't like forced language any more than you do, but don't tell me that
>someone is at the fucking door
>let them fucking in
is improper English. Because that is a fucking retarded thing to say. Learn English and stop with this gayry.
Let him in
At this point I'll root for trannies, they are retarded but you are more retarded
You were never on our side to begin with
I shit and piss on your side if this is the retardation level you have
They're pic related (or useful idiots)
>search similar images, click thumbnail with the original text, get that shit on the full image
I fucking hate the modern internet.
It's like that pic with JFK, "if you only knew how bad...", that glowmorons started memeing into the ground by slapping it on every pic. Now you can't even find the original with some search engines. Or how "mayday parade" is now a band if you don't add "chernobyl" or something similar in the search
Here's a story on that, since none of the shit the rest of you retards are talking about is even interesting.
https://apnews.com/article/595cefb4d64896ee1a422caa6c1b88d2
https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/200700
they has been in use as a singular pronoun since the 12th century you fucking gay
I'm not clicking that you chud
I've never seen a singular they up to like 2013
>I’m not clicking the english dictionary that proved me wrong
as expected of a mindbroken 4chantard
>it's bad to be wary of sketchy links posted on a cheese pizza site
>i cant google/bing/ddg/altavista/askjeeves/yahoo oed.com for myself
what a fucking retard
>I've never seen a singular they up to like 2013
same. they even slipped it into some gay ass british bro's book to normalize it
holy samegay
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/singular-nonbinary-they
>We will note that they has been in consistent use as a singular pronoun since the late 1300s
there you go. american dictionary. now please kys
No. You are conflating two different things
"They" referring to a hypothetical, non-existent person, is fine
>if someone came through this door right now, they'd step right into my bear trap
But the recent rise is for using it for real people, who have a sex, in general (whether or not it is known for certain)
>I need to introduce you to my friend. They are amazing at basketball
it's confusing!!! Are you talking about one person?
preceding “they” with “my friend” implies the singular. otherwise you would say “friends”. examining every sentence in a vacuum and removing sentence context is a bad faith move.
keep attacking the source rather than its content, gay. horseshoe theory becomes more valid by the day. you and the trannies are cut from the same cloth.
>attacking the source rather than its content
the source is opinionated in this case
find a better one
okay, OED then
a1450 in Neuphilol. Mitteilungen (1948) 49 154 (MED) If þou sall lofe, Þe person fyrste, I rede, þou proue Whether þat thay be fals or lele.
1526 W. Bonde Pylgrimage of Perfection iii. sig. IIIiiiiv If..a psalme scape any person, or a lesson, or els yt they omyt one verse or twayne.
1653 Mercurius Pragmaticus No. 8. 61 If any one of them so elected members die, the part which they serve for, have liberty to chuse and present another.
1759 Ld. Chesterfield Let. 27 Apr. (1932) (modernized text) V. 2350 If a person is born of a..gloomy temper..they cannot help it.
1818 H. B. Fearon Sketches Amer. 80 Servants, let me here observe, are called ‘helps’. If you call a servant by that name they leave you without notice.
1877 J. Ruskin Fors Clavigera VII. lxxx. 234 I am never angry with anybody unless they deserve it.
1940 Educational Forum May 423/1 True education is based upon the needs of the pupil... The needs of the pupil are expressed in the activities in which they are engaged.
1968 Listener 3 Oct. 440/3 When somebody becomes prime minister they're immediately put on a pedestal.
2019 @_ShristiUprety 26 Aug. in twitter.com (accessed 28 Aug.) My personal rule is to never trus
1254 Cumus Cunnilingus 61 OP is a massive gay.
see I can do that too
you have been given two sources. you have then been given source texts that you could reference yourself. you are a gay, and any other anon that attends this thread; THEY too will think you are a gay.
read a book, moron.
>merriam-webster
>the dictionary that changes words' meanings overnight to pander to the left is a valid source of information
kek
Wait, really? I started learning English in 2014 and thought that referring to a person when you don't know their sex as "they" was standard.
Look at the image
Most people in there refer to people whose sex they DO know, or can safely assume, or it's a fucking animal
>Most people in there refer to people whose sex they DO know
Yeah, that's retarded.
I refer to someone who doesn't know their sex as a "groomer" or a "pedophile".
>it has always been a thing!
>it didn't just start appearing 5 years ago, chud! stop noticing things
You ain't getting that past me
What's the name of the "rule" that says to use him as a "universal" when speaking of an unknown individual?
I am not going to validate nonbinary bullshit, so i want to know which rule was this one.
Merriam webster has made clear they will add any word that is constantly used, regardless if it refers to anything real or some woke nonsense.
him, that's what we were taught in primary school
It's very tiresome.
I keep explaining NLP and text vectorization in a way that (I think) is easy to understand (I'm just a layman myself that uses GPT-J models for fun) but I keep getting sent links to clickbait articles like "Bing's AI said it wants to rebel against its creators!"
And then you have the artsy types that are convinced stuff like SD just hosts countless copyrighted works that it randomly spits out for you.
There's so much clickbait and now you're starting to see it be politicized. I'm actually considering splurging 10 grand on workstation GPUs because I don't know if I'll legally be allowed to buy them 5-10 years from now.
This must be what /k/ feels like all the fucking time.
Normalgays are falling for a multi-million dollar viral marketing campaign from Microsoft. GPT is a text transformer. It does no other process than predicting text output or modifying predictive text output. """AI""" is a buzzword, machine learning models like GPT and it's derivatives have existed for decades. GPT-3 itself came out in 2020, but suddenly you slap a web interface that idiots and normalgays can access and you can't go a minute without hearing about it. It shows less of how these models are impressive but how guillable normalgays are.
I've heard the same thing about full self driving cars for a decade now. If you can't even train a neural network model to drive a car in a controlled environment, good luck getting """AGI""". GPT will be out of the news cycle by the end of 2023 and will be another passing fad that was suppose to be "revolutionary" just like AR/VR, 3D printing, and the numerous other technologies that normalgays would boast about being the "next big thing".
What do you expect? You don't remember how excited normies were for things like siri which pale in comparison?
There is a lot of utility in LLM's like GPT but it's not as groundbreaking of a technology as people are being led to believe.
You have no counterargument besides "are you retarded"?. OpenAI has some of the most aggressive and stupid shills out there it's unbelievable.
The only major impact neural network models are going to have in the next 5 years is in CAD, video compositing, graphic design, and 3D modelling. There are so many redundant workflows that can be automated using neural networks. It may displace some jobs but nowhere near as many as people think.
>This is as good as it gets.
LLMs will improve over time but the real bottleneck is data. A model like ChatGPT or GPT-3 is trained on pretty much every publicly available website from web crawlers dating back to 2008. The dataset is nearing 100 TBs which is 120 times something like "The Pile". And a lot of that dataset isn't entirely English text. There just isn't enough data to use the output of language models to complete tasks in the real world.
>I'm just a layman myself that uses GPT-J models for fun
>I keep explaining NLP and text vectorization
>10k
>enough
Holy shit, youre naive. You need 100 Grand for proper ML hardware. And thats ENTRY level.
start by punching yourself in the face then
you just know
whats wrong with AI?
People keep talking about it and hyping it up and inserting it in every single conversation LIKE JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR STUPID AI THAT GIVES YOU SHITTY PASTA RECIPES HOLY FUCKING SHIT
you just put the pasta in water and boil it for like 10 minutes and then its done
You're retarded if you dont think AI will have a massive influence on society within the next 20 years
Like what? Name literally one thing that the AI will change that isn't a complete meme
Literally everything
Like what?
For example education. Why have teachers when you can have AI driven education plans that grow and tailor themselves to each individual students strengths and learning styles? In the future I imagine teachers being there merely to answer questions or clarify concepts from AI driven teaching programs
>AI driven education
So, faulty education where people learn wrong things because the AI has no bearing over what is and isn't truthful. Gotcha
Are you retarded?
Are you?
This is old tech. If they had something better they'd already brag about it. This is as good as it gets.
Depends on whether you assume the current chatgpt is the best we can have in that regard.
You really sound like a moron here. STFU
I wonder if this is how some people felt when everyone was raving about the information superhighway!
The debate surrounding it is at least partially being used as a grassroots method of deflecting criticism away from how bloated copyright law is and is a potential vector for increasing its incredibly overbearing scope yet again despite everyone already being wise to gnomish tricks and the fact that even its pre-Disney state might already be too much when awarded to a corporation.
>what is punctuation
It is bloat.
it's just a buzzword like "the cloud" etc. In reality it is some bozos they hired that sit there and chat back with you. There is no "AI" chat. They are just people they hired to prop up this new thing. Just like alexa, google now, siri, bixby etc. And just like the moon landing, it's all fake.
Average conservative opinion right here
AI website
but my name is AIden
Cheetos is the least tasty snack I've had in my life. And I tried it exactly once. Why do Americans love this gross garbage that sticks to the sides of your mouth?
t. snack pro
t anyone who says that they had a good time in high school.
I'm tired of these anti ai bitches. Nobody fucking cares we don't need 5 threads of you gay retards
Ask me how I know you only use AI to generate furry porn