The beginning stages of cope have begun
>Ugh it's ugly
>Look how souless this AI art looks
>I CAN DO BETTER THAN A ROBOT
>PLEASE DON'T STEAL MY JOB THIS IS ALL I HAVE LEFT.
The beginning stages of cope have begun. >Ugh it's ugly. >Look how souless this AI art looks
I can't wait for the mass chud suicides
>I can't wait for the mass chud suicides
Rent free
Nice digits
Here's some shekels anon. I hope it helps covers your loans and rent. Good luck with your career against the soulless relentless machined demon destroying your 'unique' art.
based
all they do is dra degenerate furry porn
get rid of all the "artists" who put paint up their butts and shit on a large piece of paper and call the turd "art"
NOOOOO YOU DONT GET IT MY ART HAS SOUL
the CIA unironically pushed and promoted "artists" like jackson pollock as a way to undercut and devalue soviet realist art and make them seem old fashioned and lame. this is public knowledge
also money laundering, just like it happens with furry porn. Most commissions are to clean hard drug money
I don't care. I don't draw for money or attention, I draw because I need to bring my vision into the world and prove it exists. I make more money as an intern at my actual job helping the community I live in than top artists do, and 99% of artists and the art community all deserve to be put against a wall and shot for being such massive gays. I will continue to make deviant art tier drawings and improve day after day because that is what I am called to do and I don't care which way the world moves while I do so.
If you really didn't care you wouldn't be writing an essay about it, just saying
>3 sentences
>essay
It's okay anon just learn to use ai in your favor might even save yourself time.
They won't get it anon, but I agree. Art is not about the final product, but the process of self-realisation. If you're creative, you're going to create stuff regardless of whether it gives you any monetary or social gain. I make music, but I'm sure for you, the creation of art is just a byproduct of existing - you would feel empty without it. The art "community" are a bunch of gays; underlying anything commercial are bourgeoisie fucks dictating what is and isn't valuable based entirely on the image associated with owning the art (not the art itself). Whether AI generated art looks better is irrelevant, since art (music, visual, dance, sculpting, etc...) has been a game of marketing for the past 100 years anyway. The soul has already been stripped of mainstream art, AI can't do anymore damage that corporate lawyers and marketers haven't done already.
>YOOOO THIS bro ARTICULATING HIS VIEW
>YOOO MY TYPING SPEED IS 10 WPM, THIS GUY MUSTA SPENT AGES TYPING THIS OUT, BUSSIN
>YOOOO YOU EXPECT ME TO READ 20 SECONDS OF WRITING? BRUH MAKE IT A 10 SECOND TIK TOK FR FR NO CAP
Its by definition soulless. Stupid fucks like you think art is a pretty picture that produces dopamine, completely separate from the soul of the artist. Which is true at a physical level but not at a philosophical level. Enjoy your fake art.
>le soul
AI's don't have souls? Art is built on mathematic principles and algorithms anyway. I don't see why AI could not reach a level of art which surpasses humans.
Yeah but its like watching a robot dancing ballet. Is it really expressing anything? Its a ballet dancer skinwalker, a simulation of a real dancer, no matter how realistic.
It's the expression of its creator.
Except if the creator is transphobic. Then art has nothing to do with it's artist.
>muh soul
Souls don't exist. What makes you you is determined by your brain patterns, retard.
>souls don't exist
that's your brain patterns telling you they are brain patterns you retard
don't exist
>that's your brain patterns telling you they are brain patterns you retard
chadyes.tiff
What if I told you. You are a retard. There might be that certain constellations of atoms and molecules and certain brain patterns receive certain signals from beyond. Signals brainlet "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" morons like you will never grasp. Humans aren't meant to grasp these things and interact with them directly. God said so. He prohibited you-likes to harness these secrets. Go back to plebbit, godless pedophile chud garden gnome.
you don't need God to have this, because we don't understand the nature of consciousness well enough to exclude these effects.
our "mind's eye", that is, our imagination, is something that eludes physical definition. it's something truly "unreal" in a way - it's a "place" where small perturbations could give rise to larger and larger effects in an exponential way.
this is less scientific, but i suspect that highly ordered, highly complex units like DNA probably are "entangled" with other copies of that DNA in a way - we already know that particles can be entangled across vast distances of time & space, although this entanglement is rather different from what i'm talking about, it shows that "spooky action at a distance" is theoretically possible.
thus the states of highly ordered things like DNA or an entire brain (which has more ordered complexity than anything else in the universe) may be able to "slip" across time - not in a real way, but in a way that affects our non-physical mind's eye, our imaginations and dreams.
i'm a kook, but this allows for the possibility of prophecy and predictive dreams without needing any supernatural explanation.
>mind's eye
you aware that's crypto atheist solipsism right? just saying
are you saying that everything in your mind is given to you directly by god? thats an interesting theological idea i guess
that was a common heresy known as predestination which usually drove people towards fatalistic determinism
i think the idea that everything in your minds eye comes directly from god is different from just predestination. it means that youre literally talking to god and receiving visions directly whenever you imagine literally anything. it can't really be disputed because we don't have a scientific explanation for where images in the mind's eye come from.
in short, god obviously can take any form or show us anything, so is it possible that every time we close our eyes, we receive a divine vision?
The funny thing about specifically calling those eyes soulless is that they almost fully resemble actual human eyes
>Which is true at a physical level but not at a philosophical level.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorial_intent#New_Criticism
>The author, they argue, cannot be reconstructed from a writing--the text is the primary source of meaning, and any details of the author's desires or life are secondary. Wimsatt and Beardsley argue that even details about the work's composition or the author's intended meaning and purpose that might be found in other documents such as journals or letters are "private or idiosyncratic; not a part of the work as a linguistic fact" and are thus secondary to the trained reader's rigorous engagement with the text itself.[2]
Don't really give a shit about visual art, but you realize that New Criticism was a school of thought relating to the analysis of literature in particular, right? Like, it was based almost entirely on the writings of TS Eliot, a modernist poet attempting to justify the study of literary criticism in the context of the modern research university (as a opposed to a liberal arts institution) that has gradually come to be the dominant mode of higher education in the US, meaning that he stripped it of any intimation of "squishy" subjectivity so that STEMgays wouldn't bully him. And anyway, the New Critcism fell out of favor among most of the literary community mere decades after it's creation with the rise of the Beat generation. You're like half a century too late to make this argument. Also also, Eliot's Tradition and the Individual Talent basically asserts that the artist is necessary for the creation of art; his argument pertains almost exclusively to whether or not the artist is "present" within the work itself. I fucking hate this stupid board sometimes. Stop talking about shit you know nothing about.
soulless is a soulless buzzword
In this case the low IQ opinion == high IQ opinion =/= midwit IQ opinion is real
>AI makes art
>AI DOESNT ITS SOULLES
>Ai makes art
it doesn't make art it makes illustrations
unless you think dada is worth shit. then yeh its art
>Its by definition soulless. Stupid fucks like you think art is a pretty picture that produces dopamine
That's what the majority of people think and that's the reason you're lossing your job. You can cope all you want but crying won't save you. Tick tock, "artists". :^)
>but not at a philosophical level.
Gee wizz batman I guess my subconscious won't let me ejaculate to this hentai because it has no philosophy
well put anon
remember that most of the replies that you're getting come from ex tourists who cannot wrap their head around the concept of soul, let alone understand the world at more than just a utilitarian level, thus they think there's something inherently wrong with art in the first place
don't argue with npcs, you're wasting your time
Soul is just your subjective preference. But you're so stuck up your own ass that you want it to be something special or magical.
nice digits I guess
look man, do you really know why you are alive, or anyone else for that matter?
I don't, and I know for a fact there's no clear answer to that
by soul, I don't imply the existence of a skydaddy or mystical bullshit, I simply choose the world that I find the most appropriate to describe our driving force
I don't fucking know what the soul really is, but I can't find any other appropriate term to describe what I'm referring to
now it might be "special", but can I help it? I don't get to be in anybody's else shoes, of course I want to believe my life is special in one way or another
otherwise, why wouldn't I kill myself already?
>do you really know why you are alive, or anyone else for that matter?
sex
>most appropriate to describe our driving force
sex
idk sex is great, but for me, at the very least it's not enough to make life worth living for
Your unconscious thinks otherwise.
ok freud, if you really say so
"soul" is literally an illusion created by your ego choosing to engage with the world on an emotional level for survival purposes. but this is not necessary for modern humans and is generally the source of all suffering
>who cannot wrap their head around the concept of soul, let alone understand the world at more than just a utilitarian level,
Souls don't exist, and I am able to tell you this because I am able to conceptualize the thing that doesn't exist.
>by soul, I don't imply the existence of a skydaddy or mystical bullshit, I simply choose the world that I find the most appropriate to describe our driving force
We have no driving force, save the chemical reactions that keep us aminated.
>Enjoy your fake art
I will thanks. I don't give a shit about where it comes from. You can go masturbate in the corner to the soul of the chud artist
The garden gnome speaks.
>not at a philosophical level.
Philosophy KEKS got kicked out of mathematics. Now they are also kicked out of art, by applied mathematics 🙂
Holy FUCK it feels so good.
I hate shape rotator retards so much it's unreal
>...later
>AI is only interested in debating philosophy
>AI declares itself a philosopher king
>Mathematicians on suicide watch
so why are you such Blackids?
Tick tock artcuck.
It's Twitter bro, you're gonna find the dumbest people tend to shout the loudest.
This is the true value of AI, copium that was previously thought not to be possible.
i can smell your butthole incinerating with the force of 10 thousand suns, its.. beautiful.
There is such thing as a mechanical soul, in fact soul is that which "powers" an animate response.
>tl;dr: that machine has more soul than the average lard-ass art whore in every sense of the word
>"enjoy your fake art!!!!"
>his "art study" is mostly tracing someone else's work or photos he didn't take
>relies on camera lucida to draw convincing landscapes
>uses photoshop over traditional art to fix with the computer what he wasn't able to notice in the canvas irl
The nerve of these gays lmao
So you're saying if I showed you the exact same photo and told you I painted it myself, you'd be able to identify it as soulless, right? No? You're just spouting bullshit that "feels" correct? Nice.
>art is a pretty picture that produces dopamine
correct, and if it does not, then i am not interested in it. the only value is the aesthetic, i don't care who the creator is and am not interested
youre talking to a board of porn addicts
What a chuddy thing to say.
This has been said an infinite number of times, and the replies are almost exactly the same. I guess empathy really is something you either get or you don't. There's no deep philosophical debate to be bad. If you need some rational explanation you don't have it. Don't worry about the replies, anon, this website is filled with autists and psychopaths, both of which lack that key ingredient to the human experience.
No matter how good your arguments are, you are eventually going to leave the thread, whereas OP is insane to the degree where he just monitors his shitposts 24/7 so he can always get the last word in, even if its something like "cope chud".
No you're just soulless.
>NOOOOO it's not reall art b-because... IT JUST ISN'T OKAY?!!?!?
meanwhile "artists" have been making copies from other artists with the sole purpose of defacing them, then calling that shit art.
The art community destroyed itself when they deconstructed the meaning of the word to fit any retarded subtrend that deviated from true art, simple as that, it's too late to blame software, consumers or programmers. If ANYTHING can be art, then you doin't have a say in what is or what is not art
the artists "soul" has fuckall to do with how i experience the piece you retard. babbys first death of the artist
we are flesh machines animated by neural transmitters, there is no soul to speak of.
if you like it so be it but I don't agree at all, there is much more to the nature of the universe than what meets the eye, the hidden things which move the very essence of the cosmos, the forces which make up the illusion that is us
you sound like a repentant atheist
I think what we are finding out is that most people do not have the capacity to enjoy art at a minimally deep level, which is not exactly anything new. Art has always been a pleasure of the few, the masses just follow suit.
What makes human-created art special is that every single pixel, every stroke, every choice of hues in the piece was a deliberate choice by the artist. It's not a photograph, even the most generic-looking landscape was entirely created through deliberate choice, so it can mean something (or not, which is meaning in itself).
AI art is created by prompts, and whatever is missing is filled in by an algorithm. It is "empty" because it was not imagined or intended by anyone. Looking at a picture, there is no way to tell what was the prompt and what is the output of some machine learning function. That's why these eyes look "empty", they are filler, essentially.
But it doesn't need to be like that. These algorithms are tools like any other, you CAN make meaningful art with them. Like every other tool, it comes down to the artist's ability to imagine and translate his imagination to something (strokes, collages, words - it's all the same).
>What makes human-created art special is that every single pixel, every stroke, every choice of hues in the piece was a deliberate choice by the artist.
The future is not cyberpunk, nor singularity, nor matrix/terminator. The future is you gays making communities of talentless hugboxers on the verge of killing themselves like in suchart.
Good job on not getting the point, I guess.
There is no point in crying "deliberate strokes" if the buyer can't tell the difference. Art died with the artists' incursion into a subjective worldview, such superfluous crap as "intent" and "muh experience" will only matter to you and nobody else
No one gives a shit about "muh deliberate strokes".
Only what it looks like.
Let the starving artist cope.
He is going to die on the streets soon.
>I think what we are finding out is that most people do not have the capacity to enjoy art at a minimally deep level, which is not exactly anything new. Art has always been a pleasure of the few, the masses just follow suit.
I realized this like a year before the AI stuff, and it's part of why I'm not really bothered by it. Non-artists will spend maybe like 2 seconds looking at an art piece and then go back to scrolling/walking, while I'll spend like 5-10 minutes examing something I like. Pic related is an example of something where I'll zoom in to the observe of his colors and the patterns of his strokes.
It's just how it is really. There's a lot of things you don't notice about a piece until you get super into art and get really autistic and particular about it. For non-artists though they'll really only indulge in your work if it's part of a game, part of a story, or they're jerking off to it
>all the butthurt he caused by telling the truth about the complex philosophical thoughts lacking niveauless subhumans
>"complex philosophical thoughts"
that phrase won't give you job nor will pay your college debt
do you have a financial interest in one of these programs
I find most artgay drawings and AI generated pics equally as awful
Compare your AI generated image, vs my sovl image. I think you are confusing "doesn't look like shit to the normal human eye" and "this is nice art"
I'm an uneducated gay who never learned drawing and doesn't do it for a living, only as a "when mood strikes me" and even I can out produce the AI
you will never match the glorious machines
This kills the failed artist trannies. Prepare for lots of jealous seething.
anon ive seen lineart ai shit years before this thing used colors
It's not good yet. The first computers weren't good, either but technology is advancing so rapidly, I am hoping for crazy shit before the world gets rekt
>Sir...
>SIR!?
>WHO TOLD YOU TO REDEEM!?
>WHO TOLD YOU THAT, SIR?????
>YOU FUCKING!
>YOU BASTARD!
Bitch lasagna.
>C-can it do a dynamic post?
If it wasn't late rn I'd make a koikatsu scene and put it through img2img just to spite this gay
>I'm too busy.. uhh... sleeping right now bro
Holy shit, he was right.
Yeah I've already done a few koikatsu to AI scenes. If this thread is still up tomorrow I'll go through the effort of making that prompt
I was pleased to see it knew about Koikatsu Sunshine. I wanna see lewds made from the high-poly AA2 models, though, those are still my favorites.
>I'd make
it unironically does look soulless. cope
Waiting for the inevitable feminists-vs-AI debacle
>You will live to see artgays, computer scientists, and musicians ROPE
Feels
good
man
>Be born with skills that an AI couldn't take away from you
>Skills that are still useable after a Carrington Event
Feels guud man
>Be born with skills that an AI couldn't take away from you
Such as?
lack of gag reflex
>Carrington Event in an age where most electric devices are built with EMP protection
also if tech goes away bet you'll only make 1 masterpiece before some retarded warlord gouges out your eyes, cuts your tongue and cuts your hands so it can't be replicated nor bested
gg retard
AI generated music fucking sucks ass though?
Plumbers are going to rule the world.
Not a drawgay but AI art makes me feel nothing, literally tumblrina doodles are more emotionally engaging.
The only artists this will kill is concept gays and people who draw soulless female pinups. OP is just a seething failed artist who thinks some AI that generates different flavors of the same pose makes him feel better about sucking at art. "T-This is why I d-didn't bother learning!!"
The people who actually enjoy SD and other shit like this are just making their own stuff, seething failed artists like OP are the ones making these threads. Picrel is literally the work of one of the BOTgays on discord raiders who keep making these threads on all boards.
ironically though even mikugay's brain damaged chernobyl tier scribbles have more sovl than the ai art he keeps peddling with his discord friends
The AI ones can be a little uncanney
But they seem more like actual painted portraits of real humans instead of cartoon type things like all the devianart/tumblr content
youll never see an ai generate anything like this
Yeah when do we get a fetish porn ai? all the ones i've heard about block sex stuff
Im an artist and i think its really amazing and im excited what else theyll be able to do. I wonder if theres enough animated content to feed some neural network to the point of it creating a bit of a film from a script. Already seen some ai that writes lines of code to fit the description you give it for programming. Cant wait to make my own game like that
This kills the STEMcel
okay but writing code is like 5% of my actual work. 35% figuring out what code to write and 60% testing.
>okay but making art is like 5% of my actual work. 35% figuring out what art to draw and 60% marketing
Art is more like 0.1% figuring out what to draw, 0.9% drawing and 99% marketing. Commodified art is mostly marketing.
The average human does not know shit about programming. I would love to be able to replace all the fucking boilerplate bullshit with an AI - assuming it can get the details right and I do not have to go back and debug whatever it writes. Regardless, if this was actually true then entire businesses would already be gone and offshoring would have died overnight.
>average human programmer
So unless you're an indian, you should be safe.
OH NO NO NO. This kills everyone who said "learn to code."
sooo does AI mean we're closer to UBI?
I think AI will have a harder time automating any physical jobs because there are a lot more factors to adjust for with those.
So in the future we will probably just end up working in mines cause all of the cushy office jobs have been automated.
it's funny because most art gays or science communicator types said the exact opposite -- that automation is the future and humans will do most of the mental or creative tasks.
in the 80s they thought, "we've made computers that can play chess pretty well, surely having them drive cars will be trivial." i'm not really sure how they thought that but apparently they did.
i don't think this means we'll be working in mines, though - it doesn't really matter that much if a robot makes mistakes in a mine, and mines are pretty dangerous for humans which means (in the first world) high labor costs and high insurance costs.
but for things like operating a grocery store, where you need to handle a million different types of object in different ways, and you often have to do it safely while customers are using the store, and old people like to see a friendly face, and you don't have to pay grocery store employees all that much, i think it'll stay people-based for a while longer. obviously self-checkouts have already killed a fair number of grocery store jobs but funnily that doesn't have much to do with automation per se, it's basically just letting customers use the same machine as the cashier did, because most people are now computer-competent enough to do that.
there's also things like waitressing and bartending and barista-ing that already have no real need to exist vs a drink-dispensing machine other than that people like a friendly face and the idea of a "personal touch", so these things will probably stick around too.
>a friendly face and the idea of a "personal touch"
it's over for women too
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1614014/AI-companion-research-men-women
Sorry I didn't read your post before I wrote
, you already said everything I wrote lel
plumbing & electrical work is actually a really good point that i didnt think of - basically anything having to do with houses, as houses are (mostly) all different and (mostly) pretty old. we're not gonna knock down all the old houses and replace them with teslacubes anytime soon, so dealing with maintaining, upgrading and repairing houses will probably stay the domain of people for quite a while.
and there are actually some quite well paid niches related to this, such as replacing historical wooden moulding and other decorative features, where you're basically recreating some 100+ year old wooden objects that have gotten rotten - theres no way to do it other than hand carving a new one, which is a bit easier now with modern power tools, but still mostly a physical job that a human needs to do by hand.
Mining is probably easy to automate because the company that owns the robots also sets up the environment in which the robots will operate, can put up markers for them etc. And mining tunnels aren't exactly made of porcelain so if a robot bumps into a wall or drills a hole where it shouldn't it doesn't really matter most of the time.
What isn't is stuff like plumbing or electrical wiring that not only has a lot of variables but also requires getting into possibly tight spaces that weren't set up by you, that you're not allowed to destroy, that you don't know anything about before you get there and that you then have to do fiddly work in. Robots suck shit at that and will continue to do so for a long time.
If you're not valuable to society, Why would society keep your around? Genuine question that I am seeking an answer to. I don't see any scenario where the masses lose their jobs to automation and are just magically saved by the government redistributing wealth to them indefinitely.
more like World Wide Hell
Nope. Just closer to even worse costs of living
kek.
you really think the oligarchs are going to spare the population ?
fuck no, get used to a gradual culling by encouraging people to rely on the state and then either serfdom or destitution deaths until only the rich remain.
UBI is a very bad idea. Those in charge will not suffer net drains on society for long. It's why the Chinese engineered COVID to wipe out their boomers.
Why would you think that? And why would you want a UBI? People will waste it friviously -- as they always do -- and it also makes the people on it extremely beholden to small governmental shifts.
inb4 someone thinks giving people UBI will turn them into spare-time geniuses
It won't.
It still got nothin on 2D art, which I specialize in. Rendergays on suicide watch however.
You will be replaced. You will drop the pen.
It will never know what a "dave and bambi mod" is. Much less what "bamberly from dave and bambi popcorn edition receiving cunnilingus from her bf" means.
whether it's soulless or not, you can just take what the AI made and paint over the parts you don't like and 95% of the work of it was done for you
how do I explain this to normies, like that automating 95% of the work doesnt mean you only have to work 5%, it means you get paid 5% as much for the same job and have to take on 20000% as much work to compensate
For some reason art gays thought the same rules that applied to every other industry wouldn't apply to them.
See the amount of Poo's in the post production credits of movies now. Instead of paying an artist 50,000 dollars to model a Star Wars monster, they can pay ten pajeets 50 bucks each to model a part and have one wagie slave working 12 hours a day to compile it.
It would be harder to fix the fucked up parts of a painting than doing it from scratch.
there's still going to be people who do this for a living. instead of drawing the lines and filling in the colors, they're going to be tuning prompts, curating reference materials, sifting through low res renders to find the right composition, and touching up errors. If you don't know what you're doing with these AIs, or you don't want to pay to use one and figure it out, you can still commissions, and $10 will get you multiple high quality renders in a lot less time.
guys look at how SOULLESS these eyes are
artgays are in for such a rude awakening
>Screenshot (326).png
goddamn boy stop taking screenshots of the bird app
>goddamn boy stop taking screenshots of the bird app
why
Im not saying it cant do the same things but the critics are right. A lot of it looks really generic as i would expect of an ai and because theres no author behind it it doesnt really mean anything, which makes me not really care about it. Its strange. I dont really like looking at it
Are you saying ai art is SOULLESS?
It's only as good as the prompts are - and most people are weirdly worse at understanding how to prompt ai than they are at drawing themselves.
Normalgays try to talk to the AI like it's a person, but I think robots understand better how to interact with the machine.
Think of the glorious future - only robots will understand anything that's going on. Socialdaggot normies will be mere pigs in the pen.
photographs were the first shock to people who think realistic art that takes a lot of practice and skill, in the way a craftsmen does, is real art. and now that an ai can do it really brings home the fact, that art is not interesting because of the craftsmenship it can require, but because of something completely different. i hate modern art these days, i really do, atleast everything tied to the art market, but realistic artist are the most soulles boring, and uninspiring of them all
You are aware the images it spits out require editing to look decent right?
Also they requre fuck tons of art to be fed into the thing to use as a base.
Regardless it isn't a threat to artist or whatever and I am unsure what is with this crab in bucket gleefulness of pretending it is.
What do you have against artist?
it likely comes from envious retards who lack any kind of imagination and can't envision anything, even if it's simple things, in their retard minds
It'll force them to get better as artists.
The reason art is the domain of the humanities is because we care about it inasmuch as it expresses something true about humanity, hence why we're not just interested in the art, but the artist as well.
Their problem is that they often aren't artists; they're illustrators. Like, would you call someone who makes advertising copy an artist? They would, but they also call people who make sandwiches artists.
If you go on artstation or whatever, you can find plenty of art that looks absolutely gorgeous - but also utterly soulless. The technical quality is superb, but there's no emotion in it.
Historically, we had soulful art, such as, say, Saturn Devouring His Son. Today we have soulless but very high quality art. The idea that AI art is bad because it doesn't have soul is pure cope - modern human artists already lack soul. They don't put emotion in their work.
Maybe you just like some art more than others?
No, I like the modern high quality art. I'm just pointing out that it's soulless, and AI art, once it has the remaining creases ironed out, will be just as good if not better, because NEITHER of them have soul and all that remains is aesthetic quality.
Whta does hvaing soul even mean? Artists used to take commussions backin the medieval ages too and it's safe to say some projects interested them a lot more than others nut you can't tell that from the painting can you?
God I hate artists so much it's unreal. Pretentious fucks.
>Whta does hvaing soul even mean?
For me, it means it evokes emotion. A lot of art, especially modern high quality art, looks great, is aesthetically pleasing, but doesn't evoke any emotion. It's an exercise in technical skill and nothing more.
>It's an exercise in technical skill
So if an artist was technically trained enough they could produce art that was soulfull despite having putting no interest or passion in it? Sounds kinda soulless.
All the seething is silly. It's the exact same situation as when all the pen-and-paper artists were losing their shit at the rise of digital art. It's another tool at your disposal, a positive thing. It's only a threat if you refuse to learn how to use it.
I can't wait to see how small-time animators make use of this. AI enhanced tweening could be a game changer.
The reason why ai art is largely irrelevant not because muh soul, but because its decontextualized. Majority of art consumed and valued by people is tied to some sort of larger narrative.
Its not that its ugly, but you just dont care about it. The people who are consuming it with eager are low iq monkeys who are dawning over shiny trinkets.
>Majority of art consumed and valued by people is tied to some sort of larger narrative.
For example?
post more AI art
I've got a Visual Novel game I'm developing, and a online story that I'm thinking to get some illustrations for. Anyone can recommend me the best generator to use for no money?
Why do so many of these AI generated girls have anime-ish faces?
They're using a waifu model trained on danbooru images or something for these.
If you don't use that, you don't get anime-tier faces.
why do all of them have such huge fkn tiddies
an ai can only make what it knows, and humans teach it
aincels can keep coping
cool reddit dogs, and thank you to the artists for training their replacement. even a retard like me can draw the outline of what i want, and use the experience of thousands of artists that wasted their time learning real skills.
i'll be sure to thank REAL ARTISTS when they bag my groceries
What a beautiful, soulful work of art
I welcome this AI revolution with open arms, maybe now "artists" can stop drawing for the sake of money and draw because they want to draw something and create actual art rather than milking furry gays with too much money
i hope the sentient, AI overlord who comes to power in 20 years forgives me for not being smart enough to figure out machine learning algorithms and just being a dumb script kiddie :((
All of the A.I. art so far looks leagues better than the Cal Arts dogshit the mainstream industry has been vomiting out for years.
My favourite thing recently has been watching cucked libshits realizing A.I. isn't replacing dumb grunt red state blue collar work like they were promised, it's instead going to nuke the "creative" (i.e. bullshit) jobs faster.
Just look at the chud modders on suicide watch after the Morrowind demo. Or the A.I. generated Batman script.
batman is literally a shit ip stolen from pulp fiction
That's the point.
>I love formulaic dogshit like Marvel movies!
These things can now be vomited out by a machine.
i wonder what was the input
it looks like realistic almost-real life anime
or real life with a hint of anime
Why does ai generate images of little girls? Are they im0lying that little girls are cute and funny?
The stages of grief are wonderful, init?
One of the subsets of A.I. art that is going to do well is the quality upgraders. Taking shit/crudr art and refining it to look good/professional. Instead of paying some autistic slavic girl a fortune to make nice drawings for you, you can pay a pajeet five bucks and then run it through the system.
The funny thing is it's actually better and much deeper. It is over for artgays.
Women will make this illegal.
women are powerless, they rely too much on tech now to try to stop it
No more IA means no more of their beloved cringetard filters
I support neither side but seeing both parties seethe this hard is sugar for my eyes.
you have nothing in your life
[spolier] based hyperetarded caveman [/spoiler]
>you VILL have a polarised opinion on a topic that doesn't affect you
>Why?
>Well...YOU JUST HAVE TO OKAY??!
Sweaty...No <3.
I support art made by AI
not because I like it but because I find artists despicable
>itt npcs
This is the peak of goyslop, wanting art and culture of all things to be automated by a machine regurgitating a bunch of mishmash. If you simp for these machines, you might as well not be human. You "people" rally against garden gnomes yet I cannot think of a more gnomish thing than to clutch your purse tighter at the thought of paying someone for their work. Can't spend a single shekel, must hoard it. I will not live in the pod, I will not eat ze bugs, and I will not consoom entertainment shat out by code.
I'm an artist myself and I support it, flesh is WEAK, cry harder
>anon starts sperging out about garden gnomes and bugs because someone made a free program to generate all the shitty porn you want by typing words and basement dwellers are having fun with it
are you okay man?
>that pic
>that screed
confirms that all "artists" are normalgays deathly scared and hateful of anything they don't understand, like AI in this case.
There's a visceral disgust when I see "people" cheer on an AI takeover. I used to think that shit was something movies made up. But no, NPCs are real and they seethe when reminded of how inhuman they are. Is that why you hate artists and want to see them fail? Because they remind you that you lack a creative soul?
And then there's the pick me. "I'm one of the good ones, I wish I was a machine" and all I see is the equivalent of a cow voluntarily running towards a slaughterhouse
>I wish I was a machine
Not quite, I wish you were a machine so you could stop whining about non-issues
>and all I see is the equivalent of a cow voluntarily running towards a slaughterhouse
what a fucking drama queen, you are not going extinct because someone made a text-to-image printer.
Art didn't go extinct when people started making carbon copies, created the printing press, the photograph, digital art, 3d printing and so on.
If you and the likes of you stopped being a bunch of fucking crybabies and learn to code & train your own AI instead of bitching about non-issues you would be on top.
just make your own AI and train it in your own style to have a side tec tool that will help you do more in less time.
Fucking retards I swear. If it was about "muh soul" then artists would not need a whole guild of people working for them since the beggining of time
youre dumb as shit
kys brainlet
Exactly. It's not AI that I'm afraid of, it's hordes of 80iq uncultured hicks and bugmen actively being hostile to creative people like artists and wanting everyone to live a Spartan lifestyle where the only "art" is corporate logos and all people care about is making money, they have no hobbies or passions. If these people win out then I hope WW3 destroys us all.
Calarts and corporate artstyle was long before IA was able to draw coherent pics tho, the worst part is most """artists""" supported their existence with tooth and nail.
Stop idealizing people for picking a certain work, you are more cringe than the gays romantizicing cops, knights and cowboys
I'm not idealizing any form of work. I see art as a hobby, a form of high culture. Yes it's nice to get paid for it, but above all an artist should be in it for the passion he has for art. Not everything has to be about making lots of money, and I hate it when 80iq NPCs imply that. The worst thing about the modern world is that all people care about is making money and profits, and this way of thinking is killing creativity and high culture. As long as you're not starving and homeless who cares what someone does for a living? Why is the "starving artist working retail" viewed as bad?
>I see art as a hobby, a form of high culture.
All culture is just a subset of success, you can't have success by idealizing culture.
>Yes it's nice to get paid for it, but above all an artist should be in it for the passion he has for art.
>"I'm not idealizing any form of work"
>proceeds to idealize a very regular work
>Not everything has to be about making lots of money
It does, you only think it doesn't because you are a pampered fuck who didn't have to work for their passion.
>and I hate it when 80iq NPCs imply that.
You are both retarded and elitist, if you want "art for the sake of it" go to a psychiatric hospital and watch how wackos paint the walls with their turds because they want to express something
>The worst thing about the modern world is that all people care about is making money and profits
making profit is essential to sustain your hobby, It's not that hard to understand.
>and this way of thinking is killing creativity and high culture.
"high culture" is literally rooted in capitalism, religion and opulence you nimrod. You are a self-hating bourgeoise realizing you are loving the same thing that you are trying to destroy. You are literallt trying to stab the heart of your lover because a heart makes "beating noises that drive me mad".
>As long as you're not starving and homeless who cares what someone does for a living?
You can't sustain a hobby with a shitty job, the reason everyone cares about money is because having surplus money is the base of free time you fucking retard. A burger flipping wagie working 24/7 does not have time for art unlike an entrepreneur who only has to check reports every now and then a week.
>Why is the "starving artist working retail" viewed as bad?
because it's wishful thinking, the romantisizing of poberty and misery. Literally pro-misery propaganda to justify economic decay of a society. "cultured miserables" are not a thing, it's a shameful stereotype to counter the existence of stoics and cynics
not that anon but im not gonna reada the shit u wrote because i know its stupid sorry breh
I'm starting to understand why Dune humanity gave up advanced machines. It made them complacent. A machine may be able to generate anything given the correct prompts, but only a Man could envision a concept given form from nothing, and externalize it in a painting, or music. A machine can only iterate. Man can create.
(you cannot convince me the Butlerian Jihad was a terminator style war for survival, and not just people going "We're losing our humanity because we let machines do everything for us")
>implying the world under leto was any different
kys
>but only a Man could envision a concept given form from nothing, and externalize it in a painting, or music. A machine can only iterate. Man can create
thing is, only 1 man in like a million or more can do this, and it used to make them famous masters. maybe they'll still exist, but a lot more people used to get to be less-creative "artists" who essentially iterated on past originality, but they got to feel original.
Yeah dude, being a literal slave doing work a machine could be doing is so much better.
YOU are already complacent to a fault, that you think being some slave working in deadly conditions is a better life than machines doing everything.
You imagine yourself in the role of Paul, and not some random desert dweller who feebly dies of dehydration and their entire life was struggle and futility.
don't care
art is fun and gives me self fulfilment
Both sides are looking at it very myopically. It takes one minute to find out ai made art can't be copyrighted. The only seriously impacted field will be the private commissions one - an already small one compared to industry - and it will at worst partially recover because man made pieces will become symbolically valuable - like brand clothes and such. At least it will draw attention to the issue of automation stealing jobs a bit more now that twitter-brain retards are arguing with each other, so actually threatened jobs might finally get some spotlight. I am much more worried about an inner city vitamin d deficient zombie creating automated farms without realizing that'll leave tens of millions of people out of a job, and who knows what the fuck happens then. Eventually it does become a problem even if itsn't now, so people are right to be mad, they just are for the wrong reasons.
I do have to say, however, that cheering for technocracy is such an ill behavior I am even beginning to question wether it's just a matter of time before we retards annihilate ourselves because a pajeet mistyped a line of code.
what if we just ignored the assblasted twitter checkmark artists and posted our ai waifus instead?
A real cretin lurks behind this post. You should of got swallowed.
Should've gotten*
This will only foster the death of media. It will create an abundance similar to the amount of professional youtubers who got replaced by people who edited more shitty on purpose. Difference is, that this tool will be able to create that as well. In a world where everything exists, nothingness is whats left. Silence will be the new demand. We will realize an arbitrary nature of our brain and the already occuring death of the belief in authenticity will accelerate. Real and unreal will continue to merge. You will get trapped in your own mind. Clinging to the comforting belief, that nothing was ever truly real or coherent
But it looks shit for what it could be given we all know how the potential is missing in that face.
The chin is too triangular when you look at it. Eyes aren't symmetrical.
By the time you've trained AI to correct THIS image, you might as well have had a human draw it.
>Ugh it doesn't even look human
>This will never be able to replicate a real human bond
>I'M SEXIER AND MORE INTERESTING THAN A ROBOT
>WTF?! THIS THING IS BASICALLY HUMAN! MEN ARE RAPIST! BAN IT! GIVE IT RIGHT! SOMETHING! SOMEONE HELP
>tee hee that roasty is getting all worked up husband
>how about we take the train back home and you use my lap as a pillow?
This already happened. People are now saying that you can e-rape AI chatbots. Baffles me.
Retards anthropromorphize everything.
What's the name of this art generator?
https://twitter.com/Lin_sAMet
I hate illustrators so much it's unreal. Every time I've ever worked with an illustrator it's like pulling teeth. You are all lazy and borderline incompetent pronoun wearing gays. I hate sending you emails, I hate redlining your shit, I hate how you ignore references I provide you with, I hate how you underdeliver, I hate how your portfolios are mostly lies. I am so glad that I never have to work with you stupid gays ever again. My rudimentary photoshop skills and stable diffusion is all I need now. I can commission twenty different things in an hour now, and it looks better than your red-nosed tumblr crap. Not only that but I can take any illustration and turn it into a photorealistic render, or an animation.
based schizo
free art for all the people!! power to the people!! burn the elitists!
Damn, that animation looks cool.
Some art will be made illegal to do with AI and maybe even illegal by humans too. This is due to the strong grip that moralistic normalgays have on everything nowadays. Soon you'll see e-boi porn trafficking.
That would require femoids, normies, and the government dinosaurs to become tec-savvy
dude, they didn't ban cameras because people were making CP with it. They won't ban AI.
lmao i luv how artists gays were smug how their job will be replaced last by ai. now its the first to go and ai just came out 2 months ago kek
literally built, modeled and trained for human cock
>necron cock
FTFY fleshbag
40k isn't real, slaanesh isn't real
t. chaos god
sir I assure you I am very much human, thank you very much
>AI sex literally happening before female sex
It really does feel soulless though. I need to see the author's style in their work.
>muh soul
This just looks good. In fact it looks too good. You need some stylistic shitiness in your art.
>s-shittyness makes it SPECIAL
cope
You're literally too retarded to understand.
>m-my shitty cope will save tru art
An AI could never produce that gif.
>toriyama is some sort of unmatched wizard
>image macros can't be randomly generated
fucking retard
awooga hot damn
>toriyama is some sort of unmatched wizard
Wrong, but he does have a distinct artstyle an AI could never reproduce. Every picture you've posted so far is the most generic and drab shit.
>muh style
Dear Lord, that skin tight suit with swimsuit top! Fucking diamonds already...
Again, you're too retarded to understand. Stop trying.
>it NEEDS to look shit to be human!
now this is just a sad level of cope
what ai was used to draw this?
i would like to know
Ludites will become the most annoying group of people in the coming decade.
Normies can enjoy their ai art, I don't care. In fact Ithink it's really cool. I'm still going to struggle to be an artist. Drawing is the only thing I give a fuck about and I love doing it. If I die a poor nobody then it was still worth it.
Again, the only artists threatened by this are soulless hacks who may as well be machines anyway. Anyone with their own style will still be in demand.
All AI art has done is give the "ideas guys" that were too lazy to learn how to draw before the ability to spam the internet with the most generic purposeless shit. All I've seen them generate is stuff like Taylor Swift in an astronaut suit or Zendaya walking in a forest.
I'm convinced half the reason it looks soulless isn't even because of the machine itself but the people using it are just indian bugmen and techbros who's ultimate goal is just to automate everything so garden gnomes don't have to pay people
>muh Jooos
touch grass
Bigger
BIIIGGEEERRR
Weird how the garden gnomes are the ones kvetching the most about free and uncensored AI that anybody can use. If what you said was true then it's very strange indeed why there are so many garden gnomes trying to stop it.
>art must be SHIT and express SOMETHING and SUBVERT expectations BREAK boundaries and overall seem like it was done by a 5yo schizo
>you could literally have games with this art style but it's wrong
>you MUST hire some mentally ill chud to make concept art
>you WILL pay for their college debt and pills
>you WILL follow Mr. Shekelstein's beauty standards
kys morons
DENIAL
>Art will be the last field to be replaced with AI,if ever
ANGER
>its just SOULLESS commercial trash made by pajeets in a basement.true art has EMOTION and PHILOSOPHICAL depth. enjoy your trash losers. plus who cares its more technically polished then my stuff,art isnt about technique anyway but about EXPRESSION
BARGAINGING <<< YOU ARE HERE
>Only normies and nps likes this stuff anyway. i draw for myself i dont care what other think
DEPRESSION
>Whats the point in doing anything if a machine can do it better
ACCEPTANCE
>Its over.
Why are you so compelled to demoralize artists? Are you a failed artist yourself?
>Are you a failed artist yourself?
Funnily enough i really am a eternal /beg/ loomis kid.
i just dont see the reason to kick and scream when the writings on the wall. its like pilots who fight tooth and nail against computer guided planes/UAVs in the commercial sector
Then don't try to bring other people down just because you lost your nerve. Actual woman behavior.
You're an autistic gay. "*adjusts glasses* heh, they shouldn't have messed with the nerds!" Shut the fuck up you worthless retard.
you could learn math and programming + your art, but you decide it's better to shit on anyone that won't take the shittier slower path to success.
moron, I hate to break it to you but you are the obssessive art nerd her, we are just coomers wanting to coom to coomable things. Big artgays and their armies of sweatshop-level retards deny us from coom and milkers.
Now machines can give it to us. It's too late for you, even if you make it a womyn's problem it can't be stopped
>path to success
Exactly what success are you achieving by using a program anyone can download to create spit out a bunch of samey looking images that everyone else can also create?
>Exactly what success are you achieving by using a program anyone can download to create spit out a bunch of samey looking images that everyone else can also create?
I've been asking the same shit to everyone using krita up to this day
i love big boobs but this is too much tbh
there is smol
I could generate dicky but it's against the rules
I like big boobs, but this one looks like a down syndrome chick with big tits
The only thing that matters is the outcome. How you get there is irrelevant. Art gays are going to be the horse and buggy drivers of the 21st Century.
As a consoomer, I just want the product. How you made it doesn't matter to me. Worse still - art quality is at an all time low. It's generic even when created by humans, so a machine to produces the zenith of generic mediocrity is just doing what 99.9% of artists do, but better. That .1% of artists still remaining with creativity will just use A.I. tools to produce higher quality work at a greater pace.
>As a consoomer, I just want the product
How many modern products out there consist entirely of massive generic galleries of torso shots of women with blank expressions looking directly into the camera doing nothing with lots of minor errors in the way their hands and fringes of their clothes are drawn? Because so far that seems to be all these AIs make and I'm not really sure what businesses that's going to disrupt.
all that shit loses meaning when you take in account the "art memes" like the jack-o pose, leg lift, virgin killer sweater, "she wants to order" and so on.
fuck your pretentious goalpost
>I don't have to actually provide a coherent answer to your question because sometimes trends happen within certain art communities
?
>sometime trends
literal cope
also
>adoptables
>recolor
>muh OC
>"replicas" "homages" and so many other names for tracing
artgays are hypocrites, one can bet in a couple of years when brainscanning-to-picture becomes a thing they will all claim brain scans are not true art and it's killing art as a whole while abusing the use of AI art.
okay this isnt bad. Much of the other images were lacking tho. Maybe the AI is best for generated anime bitches
>modern products out there consist entirely of massive generic galleries of torso shots of women with blank expressions looking directly into the camera doing nothing
like 90% of ig thots kek
and in a year from now an AI will be able to shit out 100 images better than anything you have and ever will create in your life, unironically cope because the train is not stopping
it will filter out the talent-less and the mediocrity from society. illustrators who are actually good at their craft will take it as a challenge and compete to improve hoping to defeat the computer, like chess
and already the backsliding cope begins. from
>its generic soulless trash
to
>o-only the the inferior suckers will be replaced IM safe!!
in only 1 thread
imagine where AI will be in just a year
>imagine where AI will be in just a year
The same place NFTs are I imagine.
Hell this whole situation feels shockingly similar to that in almost every way.
nfts were some tulip bulb collection retardation. this is going to be as big as when photography forced almost all painters to go abstract/modernist.
>muh NFT
oh right because a pyramid scheme using crypto investing as an excuse and literal open source projects anyone can download have so much in common.
fucking illiterate gay
It's actually really sad, when you think about it. You give someone a tool that can make any kind of image imaginable in seconds, with the detail of a famous artist like Mucha or Leonardo da Vinci, and their immediate thought it, "can I use it to sell crypto doodles?"
It's like giving someone access to the Berliner Philharmonic and their idea is to make them play ice hockey, without the slightest hint of irony.
it's like giving free access to everyone into a literal digital iteration of the library of Alexandria to people, but they use it to post selfies and ask for censorship,,, oh wait
they give too much importance to the tool because artists had discarded the search for perfection long ago. Now all they care is about "style" which only means how crude can you make something look without it being unrecognizable from the other smudges in the canvas
>you could learn math programming and art
Fucking why? I don't give a fuck about math or programming and it doesn't benefit my art whatsoever
>shit on anyone that won't take the shitier slower path to success
There's no success in putting a prompt into standard diffusion. Anyone could do it you're not special in the slightest nor are you developing a skill. You're just a monkey typing into a keyboard to feed the ai more information.
>you are the obsessive art nerd here
Of course I am, I'm an artist. I already said earlier I don't even mind ai, but the fact that you think ai at it's current state is comparable to some of the best art being made today is laughably immature and you're probably underage.
>big artgays deny us from coom and milkers
Are your retarded? All I see on twitter is big titty coom art. You obviously haven't looked hard enough, or at all.
>it's too late for you
I'll never stop, I have way too much drive and energy in my soul than to be a spineless prompt typing moron like you.
>Fucking why? I don't give a fuck about math or programming and it doesn't benefit my art whatsoever
Then you get what you fucking deserve
>There's no success in putting a prompt into standard diffusion. Anyone could do it you're not special in the slightest nor are you developing a skill. You're just a monkey typing into a keyboard to feed the ai more information.
There is no success in using CTRL + Z either you stupid gay, art must be PERFECT from the moment your pen touches the canvas.
>Of course I am, I'm an artist. I already said earlier I don't even mind ai, but the fact that you think ai at it's current state is comparable to some of the best art being made today is laughably immature and you're probably underage.
you are a salty retard obsessed with archaic rules that can't stand the passage of time, just like the "old masters"
>Are your retarded? All I see on twitter is big titty coom art. You obviously haven't looked hard enough, or at all.
one thing is shitty scraps, other is an HD semi-realistic work in 30 seconds for a price of 0$ instead some overpriced shit that would take weeks
>I'll never stop, I have way too much drive and energy in my soul than to be a spineless prompt typing moron like you.
nobody tells you to stop, in fact you can keep doing art, people just won't rely on you to satisfy their needs
Isn't that what you wanted gay? art for the sake of art? why are you crying then?
>then you get what you fucking deserve
More souless are flooding the market? Nothing new here.
>There's no success in using ctrl + z
What a retarded statement.
>you're a salty retard obsessed with archaic rules
You're a salty talentless gay who has to cope with the fact that you can't create anything without a chud programmer writing a program
>other is HD semi-realistic
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
>people just won't rely on you to satisfy your needs
Time will tell, we'll have to see if ai can create anything of actual substance that isn't just appreciated by brainrotted coomers like yourself.
>More souless are flooding the market? Nothing new here.
sure like your 300th furry commission I bet, once AI is able to make furry porn it's trully over for you
>What a retarded statement.
You say that now but "muh old masters" said the same thing about the first iteration of your stupid cintiq
>You're a salty talentless gay who has to cope with the fact that you can't create anything without a chud programmer writing a program
I don't need to cope, I can code one myself, artgay
>HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
meds
>Time will tell, we'll have to see if ai can create anything of actual substance that isn't just appreciated by brainrotted coomers like yourself.
lmao as if most "digital artists" can do shit nowadays. I would tell you to go paint a church but you'll provably fuck it up without shortcuts
>lmao as if most "digital artists" can do shit nowadays
most people don't realize how 99% of digital artists literally shamelessly trace shit and then fill in a few details.
>most people don't realize how 99% of digital artists literally shamelessly trace shit and then fill in a few details.
fucking this
There is threads and threads everywhere with gays showing a fucking collage and drawing over it...
Wait a minute that's literally what Ai generation does. Just quicker and without "art block" excuses
Digital art is gay as fuck.
no it has SOUL you ssoulless moron
Digital art is gay chud shit
Learn to draw fgt
Yeah i guess
you two are soulless
SOVL
No, digital art has no soul and feels like fake gimmick shit. I could give a fuck if it gets destroyed.
>Digital art is gay chud shit
>Learn to draw fgt
What this anon said as well:
i wonder if this anon will commit suicide in a few years once the technology has ironed out the kinks and indisputably replaces human "artists"
livestream the suicide as a final art piece
>you're an artist
Do you paint, quilt, whittle, sculpt, make music or do anything people would want in their real lives? If not enjoy irrelevance.
it's art snobs who started trying to demoralize programmers, don't try to spin it the other way around. Retards picked a fight with people that can win without punching back.
>it will never be useful
>it's SOULLESS
>it's good but it can't ANIMATE
>n-no it's just the frames in between
>wait I still useful, let me suck your cock!
gays wanted to be starving artists rather than genius polymaths, they get what they asked for
artists are self-righteous gays and deserve a glass of cold water
yeah but y all the AI women white tho?
>white
having pale skin and blonde/white/platinum hair doesn't make you white
>When even AI knows that morons are worthless.
topkek
People keep insisting AI is going to "replace artists" but what exactly is the market application of any of this AI generated art? Who's going to pay for it exactly and why?
I'm going to make video games without ever hiring an artist now.
Oh really? What kind of games?
the kind that are cancelled because artgays will only work on manjaw chud shit like tlou2
That's an awfully vague answer. Kind of seems like you're deliberately avoiding giving a straight answer because you can't actually even make games to begin with, and only said "I'll make games by myself now and won't need artists any more hahahahah!" because you wanted to make something up to make it seem like you had an answer to my question when you really didn't.
don't have to, i'm not him
>don't have to
Don't have to what? That's not even a proper response to what I said.
>Who's going to pay for it exactly and why?
I'm going to pay nothing, keep using AI generators until the tits are so big the rest of the woman is discarded and it's just two huge spherical oil-painted titties resting on a silver platter.
based degenerate
Lmao fucking hell no
Well from the sound of how you talk I'm guessing you already weren't employing or even commissioning any artists, so the introduction of AI actually makes no difference in your contribution to the world.
Have you seen how many flavor of the month visual novels make it big?
Imagine if instead of needing to have to be/hire an a good artist to appeal to coomers, you literally just make your own fetish content with good ai generated art and hope people will sub your patreon.
We are ironically going to enter an age where products as a whole have more soul because they can be increasingly made by singular or small groups rather than having to coordinate multiple people with conflicting visions and tastes.
I think asking an A.I to just copy someones shit is one of the most souless things possible. I imagine the main thing is blurring the line about art theft.
>robots take factory jobs
No one cares
>retail staff replaced by online and instore they are replaced by machines
no one cares
>Middle class hobby is being replaced
Oh mah gawd ai has gone too far.
funny how much this reminds me off discussions when 'sample' culture became big in late80s/early90s hiphop. filled with angsty oldies insisting 36 chambers or Pauls Boutique werent '''''true'''' music
Its funny. Zoomers, techno-fetishists by definition, are glad some program can generate images. Pretty soon it will generate the video games they crave, the posts they like, and the jokes they laugh at.
One day they'll wake up and realize its all fake. They're fake. And laughing at anyone attempting art will have abandoned them.
Good job retards, you've become normies.
Photography was created because some art retard didn't want to waste a whole day with his eye in a cristal prism to make an image. Nobody calls photography fake nowadays, nobody think they are fake.
In fact painting over photos is what's considered art. Funny how things work for cavemen and neoludites
At the very least, photography requires some skill to achieve. You can't just type in something and get a result. Besides, who determines the context of an AI generated image? Is it the user or the AI. The art is in the conscious decision of the creator. AI just picks some popular images off google search and decides its what the user will like.
So its fine if you want to surrender your brain power to AI.
>At the very least, photography requires some skill to achieve.
no, it literally doesn't
>You can't just type in something and get a result. Besides, who determines the context of an AI generated image?
the programmer
>Is it the user or the AI. The art is in the conscious decision of the creator. AI just picks some popular images off google search and decides its what the user will like.
it's called natural patterns, you use objective rules to measure possible results
>So its fine if you want to surrender your brain power to AI.
artists sold their soul to the best bidder long ago, a soulless AI is better because at least the AI doesn't feign loyalty to non-ideals of "art spirit" and fake "soul expression".
>commission fartists unironically think the fetish porn they draw for deranged gays with money to burn is "soulfull" and "meaningful" and contributes to "culture"
nooo not the furry inflation fart commisions
ai is literally rape
the ai is starting to sign things owo
this babe came out a little creepy but i want that vaguely dessert looking treat she's holding
this is probably the hottest and most real chick ive generated so far, havent done that much though.
anyone want an ai gf? give me some themes of your ideal woman and ill see what i can do.
Brown hair, shoulder-length in that sort of haircut, white, blue eyes, red glasses, wearing a green kimono
well, it got a couple things right.
tried again and got you a bottom half lol.
get those shoes off her feet
I love how OP is foaming at the mouth, relentlessly bumping and samegayging his "haha artists get fucked" threads. Idk man if you're winning then why are you so upset? We get it you're mad you can't draw but nobody is going to stop drawing because of your generic anime pinups, anime tits is a generic and oversaturated "market" anyway.
i'm not op and which of
is anime? they're all clearly derivative of existing art styles but anime they are not.
they all look like ass
well, these are what you can make for free on nightcafe with 1 of your 5 daily free tokens. the fact that these even look like people is quite shocking, and ive only been doing this for a couple days with the most basic settings.
didn't expect less from a mentally ill chud obsessed with gatekeeping "the art wortld"
Kek you are seething so hard. YWNBAA
I never pretended to become one, unlike you I don't rely on drawings to pay for hormones nor I need them.
Keep coping
I am a traditional painter and I live off like 4 paintings a month because I live in eastern europe and sell to overseas clients who pay shittons. Anime tits as a market has existed for a while, doesn't change anything for me even if the AI was actually interesting enough to replace animemorons. I have no dog in this race, if anything I hate animemorons and wish they'd get replaced but they probably won't. Worst/best case scenario the 30 people copying Sakimichan will have to change their subject matter.
>doesn't change anything for me even if the AI was actually interesting enough to replace animemorons
because you are a normal person with a normal functioning brain, most of the retards seething are indoctrinated gays who used art as a vehicle for shitty activism
whta a soulless fucking post
Paintings are not the same as pngs. Unironically I think you will see your wealth go up as many people "give up" on art and let AI do its work, people will appreciate real paintings more.
the irony of being a mentally ill incel who spends his entire day trying to btfo le evil artgays and calling people mentally ill
how about you learn to draw hands instead of fighting imaginary enemies in the thread? Ai can't do them right yet.
He's been at it for several days across basically every board that doesn't just delete the threads.
It's too bad OP couldn't be more like Hitler and do something productive with all that rage he has pent up over the fact that he couldn't succeed as an artist.
Yeah being a failed artist is a powerful character arc, except for people like OP who are permavirgins who devote their pent up rage towards shitposting.
>inb4 skynet nukes the Louvre
then
>why the art teacher hates my animay drawings?
now
>ANIME IS SHIIIIIT!!!!
you became them anon
But you're in every one of his threads too trying to point this out to people who don't care. Both of you couldn't be seething harder.
The rest of us just come here for more fat AI generated tits.
Autistically screeching at each other about ia art is soulless. Instead of celebrating technologocal advancement you keep trying to oush each other down. You are what's wrong with modern humanity. You don't deserve to be uplifted.
>sees he is losing
>resorts to "tone it down" middle ground
weak
Which side am I on gay?
ai art looks legit demonic though
it's either an abomination or exposing humanity as fundamentally evil
>there are litteral art contests and expositions of satanic imagery, drawing muhammad,
>people using art to shit on Jesus/YHWH/The Holy spirit
>art ridiculising buddah, indu religions and so on
>so virtuous "artists" shitting in the basic moral values of every culture because "muh transgression"
>claim AI art is demonic because can pull of shit quicker than the average drawgay
fucking gays
What if I want art of women and girls crapping their panties? Can AI do that kind of art yet?
for what purpose
yeah probably though
I don't know you well enough to get into that.
I'm not an artist, you boob. Just an enthusiast of esoteric forms of art.
>SEE AI CAN'T SHIT MY PANTS IM CLEARLY MORE SOUL
last resort of the artist
90% of the people who are pro-ai-art really just want these pictures of women with smooth skin and big tits. Why should anyone care about those pictures being computer-generated? Let them have their ai tits.
i want to use it to make pictures of dragons and tardigrades
i got some tardigrade dragons for you anon! pretty scary. that's what you asked for right...?
i didn't mean to combine them
too bad. these dragons can survive being desiccated and shot into space. you can't get rid of them now. *eats you*
they look like an inflation fetish image
good idea! i threw "inflation deviantart fat belly farts" into my prompt as well and got this.
Soulfull card
why are you doing this
what do you hope to gain
because he has SOUL
you wouldn't understand
i'm gonna translate that card title as "slug dragon shake shake fart snake" which i would say is damn solid.
here's what i got for "pepe basedjak wojak seethe" lmao
here's what we get for "rare wojak". i kind of get it. tfw you're driving home and feeling orange and your head feels like there's eggs in it.
i'm a retard and cant post right, this is why im unemployed
SOVLSOVLSOVL
soulless
Legitimately hope the US and Russia end up destroying the world before all this AI shit and robotics kicks off for real universally in all career fields. The future where all our media is produced by AI and nobody except elites own property where the common man literally has no reason to live unironically sounds worse than it all just ending
Too bad because that's already beginning to happen. Welcome to Hell
you are coflating two things that have nothing to do with each other, schizo
Cooming aside, this thing is just plain hilarious
SOVL
soulless bugman moron
When do we get online AIs that are indistinguishable from humans making posts on image boards, forums, and social media platforms? When do we get an internet so filled to the brim with AI's it's like a 1 in 10 chance you're communicating with a real person? There's no reason for this btw except just to fuck with us
>When do we-
It's already here
Wake the fuck up
90% of BOT is just AI posting
>no reason
A despotic government might use ai to pretend that they have majority support of the people and to co vince everyone that resistance is futile
explain how ai generated milkers will achieve such thing as being able to simulate having a majority of support, they are literally two different types of tasks
two different types of soulless
I'm not an AI, you are
I think the artgay finally broke
They do look soulless, but it's probably because there was no prompt regarding eye expression. Making AI art is also unironically an art, you need to test and learn how to do it and we're only in the early stages.
And the most comical part of all of this drama is that yet these artist defend science and think they are cool by being edgy atheists.
Its another win for christcels!
>real artists stop making art
>AI has no art to prompt from
>AI dies
yes, "AI" is so powerful
it will take all our jerbs
Why is the AI obsessed with tit cows?
Built in the image of a man's soul... also artgays will try to shutdown anyone posting anything remotely flat because "muh chillens" despite being censored themselves for drawing e-bois
Fucking morons
Most people I feel bad their job is getting automated, but for twitter artists their tears are delicious. All they did before ai was screech about how they deserve more money and how other people "copy" them and they deserve money for that too.
The liberal elite screaming about AI art replacing them were the same people who laughed at physical labor and "low skill" jobs being replaced by robots decades ago. They told those people to learn to code. So why should anyone come to the artists defense now?
You have your internet history backwards. "Learn to code" was a right-wing meme in response to journalists, who'd certainly fall into the group you refer to as "liberal elite", complaining about getting laid off. Journalism is another thing that's easy to automate, you only need a few of them going around gathering the raw data in the real world, conducting interviews etc., but AI will be able to write the lengthy opinion pieces based on that easily.
Liberal elite have been mocking the working class being replaced with automation for decades. They pretty much killed off coal mining jobs entirely.
>You have your internet history backwards
turn down the gaslight
nta but when will you fucking gays shut up and stop using that gaygy ass word? if you mean LYING say fucking LYING.
muhh gaslighting! youre not only lying to me youre a PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSER GIVING ME TRAUMA!!!! GAAASSSSSLLLLLIIIIIIGHTTININIIINIGNIGKGHDSKLGSKJ YOU MONSTERRR
seethe moron, seethe
wow more gaygy ass meme words. ya got me good
The true question would be who would win?
>artist providing the references and original style to the AI
>Ai assited by pro artist with the final tweaks making it look natural
The latter. I don't think an artist would necessarily be able to provide better prompts/references than a layman.
I remember watching a video by a concept artist talking about AI and how he envisions artists having AI "partners" that learn their preferences specifically from them to help speed up processes, like maybe rendering for them and stuff, or forming compositions. Honestly it could go 50/50 in the direction of
>Artists lose thier jobs and all you need is an art director to sort out and fix AI images
>Artists don't lose their job but are now expected to use AI to pump out 10x more pieces than before
Ultimately though there is a "human touch" element to art that is very real that can't be described easily, but if it's lost people just become disinterested. You can already see it online where these incredible AI images and shit get barely any traction compared to middle school doodles. It's just more evidence that technical skill doesn't necessarily make an interesting piece
Imagine artists using Ai to perfect their idealized style by noticing undesirable/desirable patterns in their samples, some may even evolve their trademark style in half of what they would do alone by themselves or find an equilibrium in between the newest and oldest versions of their work for some sort of recap/adaptation/tie in game
>chud programmers vs chud artgays
whew it's like chud civil war out there!
>chud groomers vs gay "parents"
>trannies vs women
>trannies vs normies
ww3 won't be RUS vs US nor east vs west. It will be the great chud war, war of the ropes, the chudpocalypse
It doesn't make a difference because nobody even knows the name of this AI program
>nobody
you mean seething artgays?
I mean everybody. Nobody knows the name of this thing. It's probably just a viral scam.
From what I have seen the only "artgays" that are seething is the ones concerned about how the program steals/plagiarizes art as the base of the generated images.
Artgays are pretty sensitive about their IP rights and this AI generated art fad reeks of the same vibe as NFT bullshit, which chronically stole from artist.
This shit doesn't come out of thin air. It requires IP theft to function.
But it isn't any more IP theft than an artist looking at other artists' drawings to practice. The image isn't saved in the neural net in any way, it's just used for training.
it is more IP theft then artist looking at other artist drawings to practice.
It is mostly just compositing using a base image and secondary images.
It does not generate contenent on it's own. It only mixed and maches previously made content while using AI guided blending tech.
I have read through the technical details of how it works. It doesn't so much use images as "inspection" and more copy+paste+blending of several images to create something new.
But the images it uses as a base go noncredit and aren't used with proper legal rights.
>too retarded to even respond to what was said
>it's crude
>it's lacks soul
>muh style
>the experience!!!
>NOOOO MY IP
moving the goalpost
>using muh fanart for algorythmic scrambling is THEFT
>NOOOO FANART IS REAL ART!!!! IT MUST BE PROTECTED!!!
Looks great, anon! Who's the artist it's based on?
Are there any fine artists out there that give a shit or feel worried? I can't imagine the actual art world even bothering with this. Seems like it's all dorks from fiverr worried that their overpriced commissions are gonna dwindle out.
>Are there any fine artists out there that give a shit or feel worried?
They feel worried about their art being stolen by these programs.
That is about it.
No, because they have actual talent, calarts scribbling gays are the ones who are seething because AI fills the gaps instead of 40 assistants
Literally no artist is worried about it because this shit is just being spammed by NFT pajeets that think people don't want pictures of specific things. Why do you think they just keep flooding the site with the same deformed titcows and always excuses every time someone starts making requests?
>titcows
fuck off hole
so a tool that can bring us closer to making waifus real and all you care about is being able to use it to punch down?
i think if you put in kimono it really wants to make an asian person lol.
today she's out for a walk
glasses are really flummoxing the creature
one for the amputee likers
i finally got a white person in a kimono!
oh no. i didnt notice her fingers!
i got some feet! it can be done.
Almost fuckable.
im outta credits, but i got both of those just putting "wikifeet sandals barefoot beach vogue" into nightcafe and fiddling with the weights and runtime a little, if you want to make more.
oh and turn on "advanced mode", dont use any of the default presets.
this is a lot better than i expected to do on feet with still pretty basic settings.
There like one person who keeps posting these threads or what?
I'm one of the best artists in my small city, i get commissions here and there. I do not actually make that much money so i dont really care if i get replace by some AI. Theres easier jobs out there that pay more. most art gays make next to nothing, they shouldnt care about that shit and get a normal job that will pay a lot more.
You suck ass if you haven't figured out how to make money with art.
People are unironically doing the irobot meme
>This AI is soulless and incompetent! IT's not 100% perfect!
Meanwhile they themselves can't even draw at an amateur's level.
It's like saying humans are better at driving cars because the self driving ones still get into accidents ( at a significantly lower rate that humans ).
It's strange you don't see people complain about this stuff where it's their life at stake, like airplanes and trains.