the ai art protests are working

wow. just wow... every ai image is now completely corrupted.. we did it.

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this is unprecedented.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      These just scream of false flag. Those images were created or doctored by the people complaining and uploaded by the people complaining to serve as evidence by the people complaining that the people complaining are gaining ground.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Of course it is, prompting "trending on artstation" doesn't literally take what is trending on artstation right now.
        Honestly, this is very pathetic.
        I do not pity them.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Also the
          >our attacks have already reached midjourney
          is hilariously tech-illiterate
          The only way it could be better is if they claimed stable diffusion is now being affected by their attacks.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >AI can't generate text that doesn't look like it came from an eldritch tome
        >Suddenly it makes clear text in english, multiple times, and identical
        These trannies probably believe Hollywood hackers are an accurate portrayal and the internet is like that Fairy odd parents episode

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          lmao i just noticed that, the OP image looks like a cut and paste of the no ai logo, there's no fucking way it can generate that so cleanly

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          They believe stating something makes it real and that's reinforced by a society that indulges them in fantasies such as a male being a woman just because he says so. Now they believe they can make AI generated imagery fail because they want it to fail. As long as they manufacture "evidence" that it is failing, reality will change and conform to their desired reality. This is a consequence of having gone along with their habit of declaring reality is whatever they want it to be for so long.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yup, it’s not like the model is training live at all times.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not to mention in order to generate images like that, it would absolutely have to be overtrained on the "artstation trending" prompt, which would mean that there would have to be an incredibly high volume of their gay little protest images uploaded and tagged to be trained on. Way more than the few dozen they probably uploaded. And there's no guarantee those protest images would even get enough visibility to reach trending.
          We're fighting a war with people who literally have no idea how technology works, with the expectations that they will be able to win by using technology.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Same deal with signatures being generated. These people always lie to get what they want.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        lmao i just noticed that, the OP image looks like a cut and paste of the no ai logo, there's no fucking way it can generate that so cleanly

        Same deal with signatures being generated. These people always lie to get what they want.

        Not to mention in order to generate images like that, it would absolutely have to be overtrained on the "artstation trending" prompt, which would mean that there would have to be an incredibly high volume of their gay little protest images uploaded and tagged to be trained on. Way more than the few dozen they probably uploaded. And there's no guarantee those protest images would even get enough visibility to reach trending.
        We're fighting a war with people who literally have no idea how technology works, with the expectations that they will be able to win by using technology.

        these are made by pro-ai in order to get the artists to be too distracted ruining their own websites to slow down ai advancement
        you can make some by sticking the anti-ai image in sd img2img, with any prompt. then post to twitter with caption "oh no ai art is ruined!!1"
        bonus points if caption and prompt are generated with gpt3
        works ez because these people don't actually know how the technology works

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    .

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fuck off tech illiterate gay.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone is laughing at these mooks

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    holy shit so ""AI"" was just an advanced booru all along
    what the fuck??

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    does this just affect online services or does it also affect weights of stable diffusion and other offline image generators ?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >use a different tag other than trending on artstation
    >problem solved

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I can't wait until the researchers start training on these anti-ai images to filter them out kek or the website makes it a part of their ToS to allow your art to be used

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What prevents me from training on some dude's art and becoming an artist and selling my stuff too?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing. There is no court of law that can compel you to disclose or even prove that your images were generated by ai or trained on a specific person's images. The technology has advanced so far along with the FOSS ideology and a globally connected internet that it created a situation that makes it literally impossible for there to be a political answer. We've progressed so far that laws can't stop us now.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is literally just a structured psyop to train AI companies how to fight against corrupted data sets. Need to smokescreen the anti-domestic terrorism safeguards early.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this is bullshit and it works fine. Ive seen a bunch of thread like this claiming things which just are not true. Give up you pathetic meat puppet, you will be assimilated.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *