These just scream of false flag. Those images were created or doctored by the people complaining and uploaded by the people complaining to serve as evidence by the people complaining that the people complaining are gaining ground.
Of course it is, prompting "trending on artstation" doesn't literally take what is trending on artstation right now.
Honestly, this is very pathetic.
I do not pity them.
Also the >our attacks have already reached midjourney
is hilariously tech-illiterate
The only way it could be better is if they claimed stable diffusion is now being affected by their attacks.
>AI can't generate text that doesn't look like it came from an eldritch tome >Suddenly it makes clear text in english, multiple times, and identical
These trannies probably believe Hollywood hackers are an accurate portrayal and the internet is like that Fairy odd parents episode
They believe stating something makes it real and that's reinforced by a society that indulges them in fantasies such as a male being a woman just because he says so. Now they believe they can make AI generated imagery fail because they want it to fail. As long as they manufacture "evidence" that it is failing, reality will change and conform to their desired reality. This is a consequence of having gone along with their habit of declaring reality is whatever they want it to be for so long.
Not to mention in order to generate images like that, it would absolutely have to be overtrained on the "artstation trending" prompt, which would mean that there would have to be an incredibly high volume of their gay little protest images uploaded and tagged to be trained on. Way more than the few dozen they probably uploaded. And there's no guarantee those protest images would even get enough visibility to reach trending.
We're fighting a war with people who literally have no idea how technology works, with the expectations that they will be able to win by using technology.
lmao i just noticed that, the OP image looks like a cut and paste of the no ai logo, there's no fucking way it can generate that so cleanly
Same deal with signatures being generated. These people always lie to get what they want.
Not to mention in order to generate images like that, it would absolutely have to be overtrained on the "artstation trending" prompt, which would mean that there would have to be an incredibly high volume of their gay little protest images uploaded and tagged to be trained on. Way more than the few dozen they probably uploaded. And there's no guarantee those protest images would even get enough visibility to reach trending.
We're fighting a war with people who literally have no idea how technology works, with the expectations that they will be able to win by using technology.
these are made by pro-ai in order to get the artists to be too distracted ruining their own websites to slow down ai advancement
you can make some by sticking the anti-ai image in sd img2img, with any prompt. then post to twitter with caption "oh no ai art is ruined!!1"
bonus points if caption and prompt are generated with gpt3
works ez because these people don't actually know how the technology works
I can't wait until the researchers start training on these anti-ai images to filter them out kek or the website makes it a part of their ToS to allow your art to be used
Nothing. There is no court of law that can compel you to disclose or even prove that your images were generated by ai or trained on a specific person's images. The technology has advanced so far along with the FOSS ideology and a globally connected internet that it created a situation that makes it literally impossible for there to be a political answer. We've progressed so far that laws can't stop us now.
This is literally just a structured psyop to train AI companies how to fight against corrupted data sets. Need to smokescreen the anti-domestic terrorism safeguards early.
this is bullshit and it works fine. Ive seen a bunch of thread like this claiming things which just are not true. Give up you pathetic meat puppet, you will be assimilated.
this is unprecedented.
These just scream of false flag. Those images were created or doctored by the people complaining and uploaded by the people complaining to serve as evidence by the people complaining that the people complaining are gaining ground.
Of course it is, prompting "trending on artstation" doesn't literally take what is trending on artstation right now.
Honestly, this is very pathetic.
I do not pity them.
Also the
>our attacks have already reached midjourney
is hilariously tech-illiterate
The only way it could be better is if they claimed stable diffusion is now being affected by their attacks.
>AI can't generate text that doesn't look like it came from an eldritch tome
>Suddenly it makes clear text in english, multiple times, and identical
These trannies probably believe Hollywood hackers are an accurate portrayal and the internet is like that Fairy odd parents episode
lmao i just noticed that, the OP image looks like a cut and paste of the no ai logo, there's no fucking way it can generate that so cleanly
They believe stating something makes it real and that's reinforced by a society that indulges them in fantasies such as a male being a woman just because he says so. Now they believe they can make AI generated imagery fail because they want it to fail. As long as they manufacture "evidence" that it is failing, reality will change and conform to their desired reality. This is a consequence of having gone along with their habit of declaring reality is whatever they want it to be for so long.
Yup, it’s not like the model is training live at all times.
Not to mention in order to generate images like that, it would absolutely have to be overtrained on the "artstation trending" prompt, which would mean that there would have to be an incredibly high volume of their gay little protest images uploaded and tagged to be trained on. Way more than the few dozen they probably uploaded. And there's no guarantee those protest images would even get enough visibility to reach trending.
We're fighting a war with people who literally have no idea how technology works, with the expectations that they will be able to win by using technology.
Same deal with signatures being generated. These people always lie to get what they want.
these are made by pro-ai in order to get the artists to be too distracted ruining their own websites to slow down ai advancement
you can make some by sticking the anti-ai image in sd img2img, with any prompt. then post to twitter with caption "oh no ai art is ruined!!1"
bonus points if caption and prompt are generated with gpt3
works ez because these people don't actually know how the technology works
.
fuck off tech illiterate gay.
Everyone is laughing at these mooks
holy shit so ""AI"" was just an advanced booru all along
what the fuck??
does this just affect online services or does it also affect weights of stable diffusion and other offline image generators ?
>use a different tag other than trending on artstation
>problem solved
I can't wait until the researchers start training on these anti-ai images to filter them out kek or the website makes it a part of their ToS to allow your art to be used
What prevents me from training on some dude's art and becoming an artist and selling my stuff too?
Nothing. There is no court of law that can compel you to disclose or even prove that your images were generated by ai or trained on a specific person's images. The technology has advanced so far along with the FOSS ideology and a globally connected internet that it created a situation that makes it literally impossible for there to be a political answer. We've progressed so far that laws can't stop us now.
This is literally just a structured psyop to train AI companies how to fight against corrupted data sets. Need to smokescreen the anti-domestic terrorism safeguards early.
this is bullshit and it works fine. Ive seen a bunch of thread like this claiming things which just are not true. Give up you pathetic meat puppet, you will be assimilated.