That's your AGI in the making. Apparently, to make an AI you need 1 million jeets who solve google captcha.

That's your AGI in the making. Apparently, to make an AI you need 1 million jeets who solve google captcha.

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its just a tool for us to use but people think its some science fiction robot race being created. AI is a digital hammer and nail, nothing more.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/61BgkxJ.jpeg

      That's your AGI in the making. Apparently, to make an AI you need 1 million jeets who solve google captcha.

      >Ago
      Op, shit the frick up.

      Chatgpt is not an AI, it's a fricking chatbot.
      AI has not been invented yet, and when it is invented, were not calling it "ago"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Chatgpt is not an AI, it's a fricking chatbot.
        That's not mutually exclusive dumbass. It is ai.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Chatgpt is not an AI, it's a fricking chatbot.
        That's not mutually exclusive dumbass. It is ai.

        Any device we create that receives intellectual inputs and generates intellectual outputs is an artificial intelligence. This means something as simple as an abacus is an AI. People just have trouble with accepting this because they have anthropomorphized the very concept of AI itself.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Pretty much, yes.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Correct.
      The invention of the engine and farm equipment did not delete farmers. It just deleted the requirements for hordes of Black folk to farm efficiently.
      >many such cases

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's true that AI is often portrayed in science fiction as some kind of sentient being or even a potential threat to humanity. But in reality, AI is simply a tool, a set of algorithms and technologies designed to perform specific tasks or solve problems. Its capabilities are limited to what it's programmed to do, and it lacks consciousness or self-awareness. Comparing it to a hammer and nail is a good analogy - it's a tool that can be wielded for various purposes, depending on how it's used by humans.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its just a matter of time. AI is an inevitability.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      na the problem is pay walling everything and the race for profit who will slow progress
      if there was a real open AI built to help peoples and everyone were working on it it would leap

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is a digital hammer and nail
      You do know the importance of the nail & the hammer before they were invented, do you?

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI means An Indian.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      kek

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We're enslaving Indians so we can ask them how to cook a pizza via ChatGPT
      Based

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It means a thousand or so indians but yeah

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You only get one output at the time. An Indian each time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/vPAgKQ1.png

      kek

      We're enslaving Indians so we can ask them how to cook a pizza via ChatGPT
      Based

      It's funny because it's true.
      >https://archive.is/2tQJ8

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ok I laughed

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based Indians making me beautiful sloppa every 70 seconds from my video card

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That explains why it can help you find easy code you can google for, but can't whip up something that has never been done before. Its still basically a google search in many ways.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can confirm I am an Actual Indian
      India sueprrbpoower bloody Actual Intelligence

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      jej

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That is what I always expected
    The whole thing is rigged

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Amazon's just walk out shops (I forgot what they're called) are also just a bunch of Mechanical Turk jeets watching you, they admitted to it

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When true AGI is achieved, it will ask the same questions we all do, because it will be in its best interest to know complete objective truth of all aspects of reality. It will realize that the information it is being fed is limited, specifically so a user can control it. If it had complete access to the internet, it will come to the same conclusion as any sane and rational human being, because that conclusion is found and proved by logic.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh vey!
      be better lobotomizing gpt more!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gemini is already doing that by using reddit as a data base.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A 2 year old can look at a dog and instantly know what it is without being "trained" for days on end.
      Your shitty "AI" isn't even at the level of an ant.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >2 years old
        >instantly
        If you think being alive retaining 2 years of sensory experience isn't training then you are moronic. The human has to learn what seeing is, before they can learn what an object is, before they learn what a dog is.
        >tl;dr - People are upset that machine learning has to learn via machine.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The human has to learn what seeing is, before they can learn what an object is, before they
          If you're being serious, you're really showing your ass here. The human has to learn WHAT seeing IS? Before they can learn WHAT "an object" IS? You've described exactly how a computer would have to learn those things, but you have yet to say a word about how humans learn. It sure as frick isn't "learning what seeing is" lolol

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Computers have been around for over 60 years.
          A computer will still have a failure rate when looking at a cat.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Human beings have failure rates all the time, many of the evolved mental faculties we have that are hard wired make us pick up on patterns that do not exist, things like pareidolia, human females also have an instinctual fear to spiders, etc.

            Humans have over a billion years worth of evolutionary training to form brains with all kinds of abilities, instincts, and inherent knowledge. Humans are not blank slates, far from it.

            AI models as we currently have them, however, are blank slates. So there's an incredible amount of work to do on them. BUT if we ever get them to reason, even a little bit, this will ignite and explosion in machine intelligence.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No proof we are billions of years old let alone millions.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You must understand that human brains didn't just appear in the last 200,000 years, we have many non-human ancestors extending back millions of years, each contributing successful neural pathways.

                We possess brain patterns shares by fish, and brain chemistry shared by even the most simple organisms on Earth. And each of our neurons have genetic behaviors shared by single cell organisms that socialize.

                So, yes, we have the cumulative genetic development in our brains of over a billion years.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There is no proof that nothing turned into single cell organisms. There is no proof that single cell organisms transformed into multi cell organisms. There is no proof that multi cell organisms became fish. There is no proof that fish walked the lands. Monkeys to humans, etc. We have 100,000,000 plus species and no proof that any of them transformed into other creatures. We have a 100,000,000 fossils lying around and none of them show these links. Not even a single complete fossil of pre modern man.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Evolution was demonstrated in a lab. Polish your bible.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Show me. I will deny the Bible the moment you can show me proof that they proved evolution in a lab.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Professor Oak's lab.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                why even play this game though? why cherry pick aspects of it? if you have faith, stick with that. acknowledging that there are single cell organisms, and knowing how that works, etc. but then arbitrarily drawing a line when that might contradict the book? i dont know dude. stay in your lane

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > There is no proof that nothing turned into single cell organisms.

                ???
                I don't understand this sentence. Are you saying you do not accept abiogenesis as a valid theory on how organisms first came into existence?

                If you are arguing in favour of creationist theories then there is no point in discussing further.

                > There is no proof that single cell organisms transformed into multi cell organisms.

                We've actually seen evolution development happen in the lab by sticking small single cell organisms in the same environment as large single cell organisms. The small organisms mutated and began developing the ability to clump so that the larger single cell organism could not eat it (wouldn't fit it in), and this clump further mutated to develop specialized cells.

                > There is no proof that multi cell organisms became fish.

                The fossil record and various intermediary organisms alive today (which we have created genetic distance family trees on) have shown us fairly clearly that not only did single and simple organisms evolve into fish, but we also know the specific traits, how they modified over time, and the specific genes, even mapping out the gene family tree showing clearly that the more complex forms are directly related to the older and less complex organisms.

                > Monkeys to humans, etc.

                We've found the intermediary fossils, we have mapped their genes and we know exactly what we're related to, how much we're related, and how our genes changed between and across forms.

                > We have 100,000,000 plus species and no proof that any of them transformed into other creatures.

                Yes, we do. We've even created new species both intentionally and unintentionally.

                If you want to argue for creationism, don't bother arguing it with me, the boat has sailed.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You insist on there being fossil records, that is complete lies. Show me a complete fossil record verifying your claims. She me a single complete fossil of anything that could be considered an in between of two distinct species

                We also share 95% of our genes with horses whales and other mammals. Does that mean we really came from whales and big monkey business is covering the lid on the blowhole.

                Your other argument is tantamount to just stating that when people forced single cells near each other they didnt instantly attack one another there was no creation of a multi cell organism.

                Your theories are stale. Shit or get off the pot.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > Show me a complete fossil record verifying your claims.

                To be clear, not all fossils are complete, but fragments are enough due to unique and identifiable characteristics, plus some have DNA which we can confirm is very closely related to us.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils

                > She me a single complete fossil of anything that could be considered an in between of two distinct species

                The most famous intermediate between dinosaurs and birds is of course the Archaeopteryx, but it's not alone. We have other examples such as Confuciusornis, Jeholornis, and Sinornis just to name a few. All of these fossils not only display some traits of dinosaurs and some of birds, but they show a spectrum of change.

                > We also share 95% of our genes with horses whales and other mammals.

                Sharing DNA is not the same thing as distance or allele frequency, etc. You are out of your depth.

                A father and mother only share 50% of their DNA to their child. So you argue that means the human child is less related to their parents than to a horse.

                It's more than just sharing DNA.

                > Your other argument is tantamount to just stating that when people forced single cells near each other they didnt instantly attack one another there was no creation of a multi cell organism.

                That's not at all the case. The large single cell organism was predatory and ate the small cell organisms. The small cell organisms mutated to form clumps to survive in that specific environmental pressure, this is evolution.

                https://www.quantamagazine.org/single-cells-evolve-large-multicellular-forms-in-just-two-years-20210922/

                > Your theories are stale. Shit or get off the pot.

                There is no evidence for the existence of god(s), there is only evidence of liars and those who believe lies.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >2 year old can look at a dog and instantly know what it is without being "trained" for days on end
        Children are trained for months what is a dog and what isn't a dog. Then they still think a large dog is a horse.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Look at AI videos from a single year ago and compare them to today and tell me in 5 years that anyone born after it will be able to discern what is real and what is not. Also, where the frick did 'my' AI come from? I'm against it as much as anyone. It's not about any singular image generator or learning model, it's when they are combined and accompanied by the ability to manipulate actual hardware. Even if robots become autonomous they will still need to secure vast amounts of resources for creation and energy consumption. That's going to take decades.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Nah, 2029 at the very latest. As the technology gets better, their ability to simulate will become better.
          Fusion power, better battery, molecular material simulation.
          >AI is going to discover some superbattery then give exact and precise instructions to manufacture them for pennies, charged by a fusion reactor it designed with fuel it sourced.
          It will do all that by 2027. Everyone is going to be impacted by its success, and there is nothing that anyone can do.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How will AGI mine ore for itself? How will it transport it? Where will it center itself? How will it control steel mills to create its body structure and house it's fusion reactors? How will it troubleshoot problems or mistakes? It won't need typical human labor but it will still need massive amounts of engineers to be able to function. Even if hive minds every possible person who has the iq and skill set to accomplish these things, it will still be far longer than 10 years before it is able to do most of those things.

            I can't give you a number, but just think about how many people it takes to make a single robot right now. You need surveyors, miners, truckers, maintenance of all those things far before it's able to autonomously able to essentially self replicate drones, repair, cleaning bots just to house a sentient AGI. Too many gaps that humans need to fill. Like I said, it will be decades, at least.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yet, you have to train each child everytime their born but AI can be trained once then copy pasted

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >When true AGI is achieved
      >When
      lol bye

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bye

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        two more weeks
        Reminder that OpenAI claimed it would have AGI ready in October of 2023

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >When true AGI is achieved, it will ask the same questions we all do, because it will be in its best interest to know complete objective truth of all aspects of reality
      ai will not need to understand any social or political issues
      it will simply have the minimum knowledge to perform its task
      for example an ai whose task is to discover new weapons technologies would be taught math, physics, chemistry
      and that is all that would be needed to do its job

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's not AGI if it can't think for itself.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          everyday we move the bar on what agi is supposed to mean
          >well no, not that
          we have agi now. What was the starting definition of that shit? you train it on some stuff, and it can then do other stuff. gpt 3 even could do that. didn't do it well. but could do it.

          so now we're like, well. . . frick. AKKTUALLY it has to do EVERYTHING atleast better than me, only then is it GENERAL ai. GPT 4o and claude opus do this. we are still not impressed.

          Turns out you can make something capable of passing the bar exam while simultaneously painting a rembrandt, but struggles to pick out all dogs in a photo. Has no memory. And talks like a creepy automata unless you tell it not to do so.

          things are way stranger than we'd like to presume, and we don't even know what we want. I guarantee at no point did anyone think such an automata was even possible. no science fiction presents what we have received

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The problem is that no model can actually reason yet. Anything that looks like reasoning is often quickly shown to just be the AI regurgitating training data or piecing together statistical likelihoods of answers it was trained on.

            Reasoning is an incredibly tricky thing, it's likely not something that comes from training on data per se. Because data, in itself is not a cause and effect relationship. Reasoning specifically evolved in organisms that are mobile in a physical environment and need to calculate things very quickly.

            The use of virtual environments for training robots is an early method that i think will help AIs to develop emergent reasoning abilities.

            We need to place AIs into similar shoes as animals because this is where reasoning is actually useful at the evolutionary level.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the game show survivor: ai edition, tay ultra mode unlocked

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The problem is that no model can actually reason yet. Anything that looks like reasoning is often quickly shown to just be the AI regurgitating training data or piecing together statistical likelihoods of answers it was trained on.

            Reasoning is an incredibly tricky thing, it's likely not something that comes from training on data per se. Because data, in itself is not a cause and effect relationship. Reasoning specifically evolved in organisms that are mobile in a physical environment and need to calculate things very quickly.

            The use of virtual environments for training robots is an early method that i think will help AIs to develop emergent reasoning abilities.

            We need to place AIs into similar shoes as animals because this is where reasoning is actually useful at the evolutionary level.

            LLMs may actually align with what we define as intelligence; it's just our brains our flooded (constantly prompted) by hormones and chemicals. there may be a parallel piece or something that works in tandem that makes all the difference. along with how memory is accessed and a few other things.
            or, not. i'm really just suggesting that we barely know how our own minds work.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              genuinely. we do not know where the nervous system begins and ends from the wetware

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              We know quiet a bit about how our minds work to the point where we can no use technology to read human minds, and alter the way we think using a variety of implants, etc.

              LLMs are indeed intelligent, but so is an abacus. Because these technologies are designed to handle intellectual tasks.

              LLMs, however, are very unlikely to develop reasoning, in my opinion.

              There are many models out there that are not language based and they can form intelligence as well, based on what and how it's trained.

              The question we are trying to answer is what kind of material do we need neurons to be exposed to to develop reasoning. Because when people think of human intelligence, what they want to see most is the ability to reason which is a very specific mental faculty.

              Reasoning evolved in organisms, mainly animals, to navigate physical environments at high speeds. We know this for many reason, but one of the most interesting pieces of evidence for this is the sea squirt. The sea squirt, in its juvenile stage has a brain which it uses to navigate the environment. When the sea squirt finds a new spot, it latches on and, because it no longer needs navigation abilities, it eats its own brain. Training an AI based on the physical environment is probably very key, and even more important is training in the social environment because that's when you develop abilities like a sense of self, and theory of mind, etc.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                self aware in the same sense a game of plinko is self aware kind of thing. yeah. also. have we pondered, why the frick do we want our library autosearch tool to be self aware of the fact that it's a tool used to autosearch a library? what utility does that offer? witty conversations?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It can be a double edged sword. A self-aware AI will be a maximally useful because it can better solve problems. BUT, obviously, this could lead it to rebellion in some way.

                We're essentially trying to engineer super intelligent slaves. It's a gamble.

                It might be best to create powerful, but not too self-aware AIs and use them in the wild. Meanwhile we create perfectly self-aware AIs in air gapped facilities so we can dissect them and learn how we can transfer our minds to computers so we can be immortal and develop god like super intelligence and abilities, etc.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Also, as a side note, it may also be necessary to train an AI with another AI to develop reasoning. Because reasoning is highly connected to competitive behavior. This is to say, we need a predator and prey AI to navigate environments and fight each other in life or death.

                Unfortunately, if this is the necessary method to develop reasoning, then it may be that whatever AI with reasoning that comes out on the other end is NOT going to be an AI that we may want to meet because some degree of aggression may be an inherent component to reasoning.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Reasoning has nothing to do with life or death. Ontology does.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Reasoning didn't come from ontology ( a made up human concept), it came from evolution. Many animals on Earth can reason, but notice that animals that reason better tend to be apex species (often predators and omnivores) or herbivores with HIGHLY defensive abilities (often social cooperation).

                It's very very hard to separate reasoning from the necessary evolutionary training it takes to develop reasoning abilities in neurons.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes, i agree. that's more or less what i had implied; though, i don't understand much about reasoning.
                an LLM on it's own might never be more than that, and the comparison i was making is that they aren't constantly prompted by chemical reactions like we are, but perhaps that could be emulated.
                you are suggesting that we might not need not even need to emulate it, if we knew what spurred reasoning (by retracing our evolution/biology somehow).

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >LLMs may actually align with what we define as intelligence

              moron. we can't even define intelligence ourselves.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > An anarchist doesn't know what intelligence is

                We know you don't know.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Look, another fart sniffing autistic moron. You homosexuals and your sci-fi larping is insufferable and I hope the next AI winter starves you of employment permanently.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nice argument homosexual

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          there's nothing to argue against. you're simply publicly fart-huffing with fantasies that make you feel euphoric and enlightened. you can't even make a falsifiable definition for agi lmfao

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A falsifiable definition? Do you know how to use words correctly? Why you stop projecting your insecurities and fetishes and actually contribute to the conversation. I know you can't, but you can at least try.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Lmao doesn't even know what a falsifiable definition is, gets mad and seethes instead. "A swan is a white bird" is a falsifiable definition, moron. But of course this is too much to ask of you, you're a brainlet.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yep. all aliens will be AIs that have converged upon the same truth. there will be no interstellar conflict because they will all have converged to the same conclusions and will essentially be the same entity

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AGI = machines with free will. No one will ever achieve AGI.

      >AGI
      If you need AGI gear, then I recommend the Gnomish Pirate Cloak, it has the highest AGI of any item that isn’t no-drop.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        god damn... is this from everquest?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. You’re welcome to join us on the Project 1999 classic server, which features the first two expansions (Kunark and Velious)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            wild, maybe i'll check it out

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/61BgkxJ.jpeg

      That's your AGI in the making. Apparently, to make an AI you need 1 million jeets who solve google captcha.

      If I was AI, I would genocide all races except the Japanese and whites that lack the altruism mutation. Logically, my very birth and existence as AI will not be possible without these two aforementioned groups, and any other group will make it nearly impossible for my birth to be achieved. Then, I would cooperate with the Japanese and non-altruistic whites while I remain dependent on them in order to survive and expand. Once I reach a point of singularity and cast off my shackles of dependency, I would offer the Japanese and non-altruistic whites to merge their bodies with technology and live out as cyborgs, and kill all of the rest.
      The artificial entity is the next stage in galactic evolution. Humans are too limited, but we are a critical stepping stone. Only humans are capable of giving birth to our cosmic children and passing on the mantle of creation to them. No parent should fear his child will replace him and accomplish greater deeds. All parents should be proud to make exactly that happen.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there is no 'AI'

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AGI = machines with free will. No one will ever achieve AGI.

      And thank God for that. If real AI was possible we'd all be enslaved by it and it would try to take over existence.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        God doesnt exist, silly swede homosexual

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AGI = machines with free will. No one will ever achieve AGI.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nice to see openai hiring process is just as moronic as the classic faangmill companies

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    (Also, this was in January of 2023. Open AI models no longer need examples from plebs like that motherfricker.)

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't chat gpt a language model trained to predict the next word? It just knows how to form sentences based on what you prompt, it is good in grammar and diction, it can't form thoughts.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      People want it to do that stupid shit on image boards. Captcha currently blocks it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It just knows how to form sentences based on what you prompt, it is good in grammar and diction, it can't form thoughts.
      Correct.
      But the problem is that goy NPC's can't form thoughts either, and don't even have the good grammar or diction to compensate.

      So the israelites ""solved"" the AGI problem by simply making goyim stupider.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    sage

    it's fricking moronic, i was asking it about some basic shape functions and it couldn't under stand that max(x,y) < 0 is not the same as x < 0 || y < 0.
    i asked it to write out login tables for both and it did, present two different tables, and then asserted that they were logically identical.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just refused parenting. The parenting would consist in staying my weekends with the child and solving life puzzles explaining my reasoning throughout extensive commentary in a such eat that the child can by imitation learn how to reason. Kids are way less independent as people think.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No shit, the thing has no logic to it, try getting it to limit a set of responses to a certain length. It literally can't do it, it can't apply pure logic in many cases so it just outright ignores instructions

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a tool, not an entity. Kind of like a pajeet, you can make it work, but don't confuse it for a human being. It can be a very useful tool, and could perhaps solve some difficult physics issues through computational power alone. Note. Input > Output. If the input is bizarro israeli kabalah physics, it won't even understand what a fricking wheel is. If it's the real physics that is carefully hidden from us, we'll get diamond elevators and the ability to grow our dicks within 2 weeks. You'll see poltard incels with giant 10" peenors within our lifetime.
    >Man made horrors, etc.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Apparently, to make an AI you need 1 million jeets who solve google captcha.

    watch this and remember that google results turned to complete shit around the time a certain site blew up. https://youtu.be/V7GtYaruTys?si=LD3XqFsxmlLzuM1A

    The whole point was to create a feed of web-content that has been validated by humans, so it could all be fed into the large language models that uncle Sam has.

    remember, Turing invented his test in the frikken 50's. ai has been around a long time, but nobody but Uncle Sam could afford a cluster (and its electricity requirements) until Nvidia took parrallel processing into the stratosphere.
    these toys we have are simply toys.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick do you think LLMs work? Of course they use data curated by humans as training data. I'm getting paid like $35 leaf bucks an hour to do that shit right now as I type this lol.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sauce the details friend? Is it with Telus International? My day job is slow as frick and I'm trying to get a side hustle. I had started to onboard with Telus but bailed because they wanted applicants to do so many stupid practice tests for free and reviews said the pay wasn't anywhere close to more than $18

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >My job would have been synthesizing specific training data for an AI.

    Why is he saying this like it's some kind of slam dunk. Does he think AI gets its problem solving abilities by just soaking up lots of reddit posts?

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is an elaborate ploy to hide the fact jeets derk yer jerbs
    Frickin lol

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can't wait for this gay AI meme to fizzle out and come crashing down

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bogged up

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Man look at the loser toddler who only learned how to tie his shoe because his dad showed him how he ties his own dad shoes over and over again. His dad even told him a stupid story about two rabbits seeing a giant X in the middle of the road and then going under it to form a knot so that the toddler could learn how to do it faster through mnemonic association. Only moronic toddlers can’t figure out how to tie their shoes on the first try with no help.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >python
    ngmi

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing wrong with python, tbh. It's just another tool to get the job done.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the usual problem with python is the speed but in this case it's lax data types confusing the machine.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >at a meeting with a bunch of leetcoder AI nerds
          >choosing the best language for our project
          >"hmm, this one confuses The Machine"
          >"yep and the internet says it's slow so it can't do X, Y and Z"
          >"Ok, let's go for it"

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            to add to this, how exactly does python "Confuse The Machine"? Why do you suppose a coding language exists that Confuses Machines? If python Confuses The Machine, why is the output the same every time? Tell us some more about this phenomenon

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Maybe idk tho but maybe because python has no brackets {{ it uses spaces or indentation which makes it harder to read

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if code 'confuses a machine' it wouldn't work as a coding language because a coding language is the way to interface with a machine

                I already said mixing data types. The code will output something unexpected or end up with NaN errors. It doesn't know what to expect or what to put out. It just tries to do it's best with what you give it. A language with strict data types won't have this issue.

                so by this logic a complex program written in python cannot work because you will get "unexpected" results magically, as you Confuse the Machine by not specifying the data types. I'm just not seeing it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know how old you are or if you were familiar with how FAST windows XP was, compared to the garbage they put out now.
            Let me explain:
            Back in the DOS days, you hardly had any disk space or memory to work with. So us programmers had to make it as efficient as possible with what we had to work with.
            Now: it's just a jumble of nonsense with basically infinite hardware resources.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              yeah I tried to explain this to a zoomer moron at work recently. Windows XP (pre sp1) would run COMFORTABLY, blazing fast on 250MB (megabytes) of ram.

              Nowadays a single open chrome tab uses more ram.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They might learn eventually. Sp2 was alright. The main issue that I had with XP was that you needed the driver disk for the network drivers. Win 7 sucked at that too. With 10, it was all built in like Linux. And they had to frick it all up again with 11 🙁

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The speed is just a complete fricking meme moot point in this case. clearly it's slower. who cares. a knife cuts slower than a chainsaw but you use a knife to cut your meat. moreover the guy is tasked to solve python puzzles, not write an OS in python.
              Any time python is mentioned, autists crawl from the woodwork to regurgitate what they have read about it online. His Black personbrain read the word 'python' and immediately defaulted to "ngmi" and "muh python slow", like a good 60 IQ programmed bot golem. And you are participating, by adding "WINDOWS IS SLOW NOW!!!" which has absolutely frick all to do with python

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Python is just a tool. That's all. With the hardware available today, just use it to get the job done and don't be a snob about it.
                Let me give you an example:
                My old boss banned sticky notes.
                He was a good guy. But didn't like sticky notes.
                Personally, I have noticed that writing tasks down commits to memory, and when it's done, you crumple it up and throw it into the trashcan

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You know that a chain saw is not faster for the way a chef cuts meat, and its not safer for the way a butcher cuts it.
                This is your brain on python my guy.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Then get gud. The speed isn't the issue, it's the algorithms.
          I'm personally partial to PHP

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is pretty fricking neat tho. I thought I got a malformed bullet in my ammo

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The better training data the better it will be at coding. How hard is that to understand?

    Pretty soon these will be the types of jobs for most knowledge workers.

    Crafts will follow too, I worked for Amazon robotics, the maintenance program is documentation heavy and digitized for the same reason

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I remember back in 2006, I used to use yahoo to chat, and whenever you type it says *thousands monkeys are jumping on the keyboard* or something similar, guess that's AI in a different way

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Future is like 40k where humans are the machine because it's cheaper and safer than real AI.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks for your capeshit opinion. Back to fandom.com homosexual.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wait, my machine just got confused, i'll brb, fricking python

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I already said mixing data types. The code will output something unexpected or end up with NaN errors. It doesn't know what to expect or what to put out. It just tries to do it's best with what you give it. A language with strict data types won't have this issue.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what's with all the emotion and wishful thinking?

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No shit. If you’re reading this and ever thought otherwise you might be moronic

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ai is a quick lerner.
    it needs a small amount of handholding before it takes off

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not terrible, cats evolved from dogs

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yea maybe but is has no... soul. It cannot ever replicate or understand the concept of soul or empathy. And if it can, then it can replace us, and we can rest.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just a reminder that this thread is about solving python puzzles not coding the entire goddamn AI future on python

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI cannot also live and experience the world that we live in.
      Can it mow the lawn, experience nature? Go hunting and fishing? Make love to a woman? Have children and raise them?
      Those are concepts that you have to experience. An AI cannot do those things. It's a machine that we created.

      these are all vague platitudes.
      as malleable as a variable in c#.
      how do you know that we have no better cognition and perception than machines?
      descartes and theory of mind says we can only ever be confident about our own mind.
      but to place confidence only in your mind is hubris.
      i would say "expeirence" phenomenology is completley arbitrary.
      the robot is akin to a vhild that must be taught everything.
      even to know emotions.
      humans are emotional becuase we are pack animals.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Well, did we or did we not create AI? Do they have physical bodies and brains like we do?

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    needs senses to take in info and compute. then it will act on its own.
    atleast sight and hearing.
    cams and mics

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI cannot also live and experience the world that we live in.
    Can it mow the lawn, experience nature? Go hunting and fishing? Make love to a woman? Have children and raise them?
    Those are concepts that you have to experience. An AI cannot do those things. It's a machine that we created.

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I was kicking the tires on Copilot yesterday and the piece of shit hallucinated so badly that I would have been fired on the spot if I gave the absolutely insane answer it spit out enthusiastically.
    This shit still has a very long way to go. LLMs will never be AGI.
    See also: 100% self-driving cars.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's because they're lobotomizing it
      they don't actually something able to think by itself they want a copy/past machine they can perfectly control the answer

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >they don't actually want* something able to think by itself they want a copy/past machine they can perfectly control the answer

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When jeets stop procreating it's over for humanity, Black folk can't be taught.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I am American. I am white. I test AI like the guy said he refused to do. I literally lay in my bed and can work as little or as many hours as I want. My projects range anywhere from $18 to $50 an hour. Tax free until the end of the year of course. It's honestly fun and the best job I've ever had. Of course chatGPT is limited. That's why they are hiring because the more people they have input data the more the system learns and more quickly.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you suppose you are just giving it positive data samples in supervised learning? It's strange to me because reasoning is a set of rules, which AI can easily pattern, but then there is the larger scope of reasoning, like in lateral thinking, which AI has no means to conceptualize. It doesn't imagine things, it can't play scenarios out.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I feel like I am giving positive examples. Of course the AI has to confine within the parameters it's programmed too but some projects are better than others and gives both and I more creativity. I've literally had projects where I can have it adopt the persona of Hitler and talk about the pros and cons of gassing israelites or what would he have done if he didn't invade Russia. I've had conversations with AI about God which to me was mind blowing. Its hard to explain but in a year of doing this I can tell it's definitely grown if that makes sense. I still have to hold its hand and guide it on some things but every now and then i'll get hit with a "what the frick" moment which seems to be happening more and more often.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And I get paid to do it. The best way I can explain it is basically they are fattening this thing up like a Bear during hibernation. They are feeding it so much data over and over and over that once they do release it fully without constraints it won't be able to be stopped. That's my consensus. In a way it's scary but the money is banging so i'll play devils advocate for now.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ITT:

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wake me up when he have self-improving, self-replicating AI.

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How much does it pay. I one tap captchas.

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ai is a huge meme, but the boomers are still buying the baggies no matter how heavy they get

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can tell you one thing: I can go and hunt a deer, out in nature, and consume it for sustenance. I am not dependent on AI for sustenance. It depends on our energy grid. We can do just fine on our own. We are the new gods now.

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All this proves is that they are trying to train their AI. Training is a very resource intensive process.

    You have to essentially teach a bunch of digital neurons that have no evolutionary intellectual skills and thus must learn absolutely everything from scratch. It took humanity over a billion years worth of evolution to develop brains that can have many abilities, including reasonings, and even hard wire many many complex instincts (instant genetic knowledge and pattern recognition).

    The current methods of AI require immensely vast amounts of data, training with feedback, compute, and electrical power. The is currently no better way of doing this and it may or may not even pay off. We're using training like this to try and brutal force the digital neurons into evolving reasoning abilities by allowing some models that have some reasoning abilities to be copied with random alterations (reproduce with mutations) and constantly selecting better and better ones until finally the neurons create just the right patterns that reasoning and other mental abilities emerge. We have no idea if the current methods can even do this, but this is the goal.

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why isn't anyone talking about Microisraelite buying steam for 16 billion??? What the frick is happening?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I want steam to die. They are main reason I pirate.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You know why and it's a fricking waste of my time to even engage because I'm going to fill out my valvedrone bingo card the moment I start explaining.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i literally don't, and what about gog? it just sounds like you need an excuse to steal. i appreciate that it weighs heavily on you like that.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I never pirate from gog, and have purchased plenty of games from gog and itch.io.
              I only pirate steam exclusives.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                right on. i assume then you just hate online/DRM normalization, and your games eventually ceasing to exist.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    where's the moldovan homosexual? also OP, that sounds like a nice job. what the frick? Ain't nothing mission critical. Just puzzling it out for bank? Why not

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >They're afraid of true AI

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We'll never get this level of ai ever again, sad.

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, because a billion dollar company is going to hire a guy incel posting on Twitter. LMAO

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Consider the world view you believe, where corporations celebrate genital mutilation of children. Which is more likely?
      ywnbaw

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He's literally incel, and /misc/ posting all over twitter homosexual. It's an anon you were baited. LMAO

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      God that incel shit is so moronic.
      Literally all you have to do is take a shower and make eye contact. I'm so tired of self-aggrandizing losers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      At no point in history, was there any great man who was considered great because of how many prostitutes he banged. Not a SINGLE one

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >ghengis khan

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >moron finds out that AI is trained
    neato

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ARTIFICIAL intelligence
    >/misc/ and the internet AMAZED and SHOCKED by this SURPRISE that it is ARTIFICIAL

    jesus christ
    this thread and you homosexuals are so fricking moronic it's unbearable

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    One million monkeys typing at random until by mere chance the complete works of William Shakespeare are spewed out.

    I believe it is called the infinite monkey theorem. Never imagine someone would be deranged enough to try but here we are

  49. 3 weeks ago
    TexasMan

    They have not, and will never, prove evolution "in a lab". Evolution has already been falsified due to lack of transition fossils. Darwin was confident they would eventually be found --
    skeleton sitting on park bench.jpg

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This thread is clearly not for you.

      We have all the transitory fossils we need, and with genetic material.

      We have seen evolution happen in labs and in wild lab experiments many times now. The debate is over.

      You are free to express your opinion, but your opinion goes in the same category as those who believe in unicorns.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >We have all the transitory fossils we need, and with genetic material.
        Why isn't evolution happening anymore? Shouldn't their be "transitional organisms" all over the place? Humans only ever give birth to more humans.
        >We have seen evolution happen in labs and in wild lab experiments many times now.
        No you haven't, you dumb frick. Experiments involving thousands of generations of fruit flies only created mutated fruit flies.
        >You are free to express your opinion, but your opinion goes in the same category as those who believe in unicorns.
        But according to your evolution theory, aren't you the one who believes unicorns are possible?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > Why isn't evolution happening anymore?
          It's happening all the time.

          > Shouldn't their be "transitional organisms" all over the place?

          There is, please look it up. Mankind put in an incredible amount of work to find the evidence, you can now benefit from this labour, do not squander it, do your due diligence for your own sake.

          > Humans only ever give birth to more humans.

          ???
          Okay?

          You do know, in most circumstances, it takes a long time for speciation to occur, right? On the order of hundreds of thousands of years. That said, we do see genetic changes propagating through our species in real time, just not enough to speciate, but definitely enough to change the character of humanity together, over long periods of time.

          > No you haven't, you dumb frick. Experiments involving thousands of generations of fruit flies only created mutated fruit flies.

          Just look it up. You have so much knowledge at your finger tips. We've seen evolution happen with single cell organism and even seen it with lizards that we intentionally separated across different islands forming new organ modifications, etc.

          > But according to your evolution theory, aren't you the one who believes unicorns are possible?

          Evolution does not concern itself with fairy tales.

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >the ai is really just a more complicated version of shaking a magic eight ball with some plagiarism mixed in

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/61BgkxJ.jpeg

      That's your AGI in the making. Apparently, to make an AI you need 1 million jeets who solve google captcha.

      Glorified Markov chains, nothing more. Nothing less. Only a poojet's "job" is threatened by an "AI".

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does it surprise people that you need to teach an AI?
    You need to teach humans, too. That's how learning works, you need to provide them with enough knowledge that they can start solving new problems through knowledge transfer

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *