>Supposedly the next big thing in tech. >Everyone is jizzing over AI generated everything and predictions

>Supposedly the next big thing in tech
>Everyone is jizzing over AI generated everything and predictions
>Nobody seems to be learning how to make an AI model
Why? Every coder/tech guy i ask about something like Tensorflow or Pytorch is like
>what
Why not learn it? Seems like easy cash after the you pass the initial learning curve as everyone wants to get into AI

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm waiting for the AI IDE to do it for me.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if you dont know liner algebra dont bother

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You aren't actually learning AI if you're using some framework
    If I'm ever going to learn to do AI, I want to know how it actually works

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cnile thinking reinventing the wheel but badly is "how it works".

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I know exactly how a hammer works without having build one. why can't you?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's not really that complicated of a concept. Think of a simple feed forward neural net as being a psuedo-random number generator with a bunch of internal parameters that can be tweaked until the outputs for a set of inputs is useful. That's basically it. Now go ham.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >if statements = AI
    This trend toward fricking "AI" bullshit when it's just simple goddamn machine algorithms is so goddamn cringe and aimed toward fricking computer-phobic idiots. It's horrible.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Technically the human brain is also an if machine so you know...

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It is also questionable whether people are generally intelligent. Trying to claim a machine is, is just that much more out there.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Not really. It uses impressions of things we sense and a very fuzzy sort of pattern matching that cannot be emulated in machines to create intelligence. It's not just a bunch of if/then blocks that use a known algorithm to do something people erroneously attribute to "intelligence", artificial or no.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >that cannot be emulated in machines to create intelligence
          Souls don't exist you fricking moron

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >humans=my python app
        Maximum darling krugr.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ai was perfected with chess. everything after is downgrade

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because getting quality data sets is a pain in the ass and I can't be arsed.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Most all of it is marketing. It's expensive toget valuable datasets, processing them is very expensive, and the results are very lackluster.

    No wonder people actually working with computers aren't interested.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Most all of it is marketing
      Lmao cope, give it a year and your post on 4chin will go through its AI NN to check if everything is "ok" with it just like its done on facebook right now

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If you've lived longer than google, you'll know different things throughout history have been marketed as "AI". It never is. The current statistical tools clever engineers use to solve specific problems without specific handcoding is cool, but is a sorry excuse for an AI. There is nothing intelligent about it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I am not a fan of calling it AI but it is pretty fricking good for generating things, years ago you couldnt do shit like DALL can now with its "Neural Network" like structure.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Generating statistically likely images or text isn't something new we've just discovered. We've got the horsepower to do what we've already known for a long time. It's useful in a lot of specific scenarios, but they're just so far from what it's marketed to be.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Your comment about facebook is really sabotaging your point. Favebook's checks can't differentiate between porn and onions, even with tools worth more than 100M. They still use huge swaths of moderators to pull the strings.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >We've got the horsepower to do what we've already known for a long time
    Well yeah the whole Neural Network shit was invented decades ago but we finally can use it so its relevant now.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    people are learning it, how else do you thnk its made moron

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *