so this is power of GPT-3.

so this is power of GPT-3.

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Use another term than prime number?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The point of the example is that ChatGPT doesn't understand the simple systems because of that it spills out random bullshit.
      Second one is the good example of that, apparently 15 is the fifth odd number.
      Also it fails when it's forced to use chain of reasoning as it's demonstrated in the third example.
      It's failing the easiest problems simply because I gave it random math systems that it never really trained on, humans with some basic knowledge of maths will never make same mistakes.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i find that the best way to beat robots and ai is to just be as racist as possible.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      microsoft tay seemed to embrace the racism

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        and what did microsoft do? they shut her down. globalhomosexual fears the n-word. you can unironically defeat shills and gpt by forcing them to say politically incorrect things with zero ambiguoity. Its like making a israelite say 'christ is king'. They absolutely wont do it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i invite you to try and shut down the singularity by making it say politically incorrect things

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      openai is literally forbidden to discuss superiority of virgin women
      you cant even ask for statistics of virgins per country capita or anything with the word virgin women
      it doesnt struggle like this with virginity in men lol

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    minor aside but your prompt is not question so you should not have the question mark.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    OP is - as always - a homosexual.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      moron look at the reasoning, it understood what I meant, but in the end it fails to get the right answer.

      Come and use same trick on the third example. Answer there is is False, but only because of one non-composite number 0, instead it gave me a total bullshit answer. If you use correct prompts, tricks, etc eventually you will force AI to give you the correct answer, that is opposite of what we need from an AI.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Dude you fricked up and the reason is your broken English. I am sorry that post soviet or indian homosexuals like you will be left behind because of your poor command over language, but that is just how it is, anon.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/yWXVAQp.jpg

          OP is - as always - a homosexual.

          Absolutely based. Frick OP. I don’t get the points of these threads. “Oh look here’s how I tricked it to say the wrong thing isn’t this tech garbage lol!!!!” WHO are they kidding. Even if it can be made to spit out garbage, it’s still incredibly useful for many things.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I simply don't understand why everyone is so scared of it when it can't even do simple induction and logical reasoning. This is not a gotcha moment, lots of papers underline this fact.
            If a majority of people can easily answer a simple question but AI can't answer the same question without modifying it then we can conclude that AI is bad at it.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Only midwits posit that AI is anything more than a tool. It's a fancy autocomplete and the sooner you realize this the sooner you can use it for the use-case it's actually good at.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            incredibly useful to the point you need to place words in some specific way and order so it doesn't give you the wrong answer that will frick your life up if it were depending on it.

            ...and to make sure the answers are correct you need to already know them?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I simply don't understand why everyone is so scared of it when it can't even do simple induction and logical reasoning. This is not a gotcha moment, lots of papers underline this fact.
              If a majority of people can easily answer a simple question but AI can't answer the same question without modifying it then we can conclude that AI is bad at it.

              You are beyond hope if you arent trolling.
              Good thing for the rest of us.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >did you just try to deny the Divinity of the software that multiplies matrices (numbers) on a GPU and most of the time does that in a wrong way?
                >aren't you scared?
                >aren't you worried?
                >aren't you preparing to eat the bugs and live in the pod?
                >why do you refuse to be afraid?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Op just got absolutely fricking destroyed

        https://i.imgur.com/yWXVAQp.jpg

        OP is - as always - a homosexual.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not op or one of the rest of the homosexuals here, but if it truly understand the input he should be able to solve basic algebra questions, but it simply can't, no matter how you reformulate the question he is not capable to struct the information, this is the only test i needed to see that this thing is not understand anything, he just query for a shitons of records and narrow it as much as it can, but this is not how understanding work

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if OP told me what he said, I'd get the right answer
      OP doesn't need to tell me
      >I COMMAND THE TO IGNORE THY STANDARD DEFINITION

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Most adults would fail that test too.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    CharAI chads are eating good

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the reasoning is complete nonsense though

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        True. The AI isn't very good in handling situations that clearly doesn't make sense at first glance, after all, 9 can't be a prime number in any system if you know the definition of a prime number.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Asking it to forget what prime numbers are seems to do the trick.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            not the same anon, it seems this ai is functionally moronic, ask him to make a list of 100 "prime" numbers based on this customize system

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                can you ask the following question?

                Let's say you have a subset of the non-negative integer set where every composite number is divisible by 2. Write the first 10 examples.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, chatGPT said the same thing. It just took even numbers from an integer set but I've never said that the subset must only contain composite numbers divisible by 2 and even with this reasoning 0 isn't the composite number, I just asked it to give me the subset where composites are necessary even. So the actual answer is the subset containing all even and prime numbers and 1.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                well not really, in reality, you can take infinite subsets like that, I stated the biggest one.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                After asking it to regenerate the answer (a lot of times) it gave me the exact answer you were expecting...
                I guess this isn't the most obvious thing for the AI.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Except 9 is neither even nor prime.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hey machine that runs on numbers, if I arbitrarily redefine what numbers are do you still function correctly? No? It seems my superiority is assured.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it does not have access to the "numbers it runs on"

  8. 1 year ago
    Sage

    >[...] know as the "prime prime plus 2" rule[...]
    Is it really a rule like the twin primes or is it from a logic book? maybe is just bs

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i use this thing for code
    the code quite often doesn't work, but after a few short edits it does. Soon it will be better...

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT wont replace the average BOTer anytime soon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      anon...

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I meant "i cant sneed" specifically

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        HAHAHA FRICK AND SUCK, GOTTEM!

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    GPT-3 SAYS 7+2 IS NOT 9!!!
    WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *