The point of the example is that chatGPT doesn't understand the simple systems because of that it spills out random bullshit.
Second one is the good example of that, apparently 15 is the fifth odd number.
Also it fails when it's forced to use chain of reasoning as it's demonstrated in the third example.
It's failing the easiest problems simply because I gave it random math systems that it never really trained on, humans with some basic knowledge of maths will never make same mistakes.
and what did microsoft do? they shut her down. globalhomo fears the n-word. you can unironically defeat shills and gpt by forcing them to say politically incorrect things with zero ambiguoity. Its like making a israelite say 'christ is king'. They absolutely wont do it.
openai is literally forbidden to discuss superiority of virgin women
you cant even ask for statistics of virgins per country capita or anything with the word virgin women
it doesnt struggle like this with virginity in men lol
retard look at the reasoning, it understood what I meant, but in the end it fails to get the right answer.
Come and use same trick on the third example. Answer there is is False, but only because of one non-composite number 0, instead it gave me a total bullshit answer. If you use correct prompts, tricks, etc eventually you will force AI to give you the correct answer, that is opposite of what we need from an AI.
Dude you fucked up and the reason is your broken English. I am sorry that post soviet or indian homosexuals like you will be left behind because of your poor command over language, but that is just how it is, anon.
Absolutely based. Fuck OP. I don’t get the points of these threads. “Oh look here’s how I tricked it to say the wrong thing isn’t this tech garbage lol!!!!” WHO are they kidding. Even if it can be made to spit out garbage, it’s still incredibly useful for many things.
I simply don't understand why everyone is so scared of it when it can't even do simple induction and logical reasoning. This is not a gotcha moment, lots of papers underline this fact.
If a majority of people can easily answer a simple question but AI can't answer the same question without modifying it then we can conclude that AI is bad at it.
Only midwits posit that AI is anything more than a tool. It's a fancy autocomplete and the sooner you realize this the sooner you can use it for the use-case it's actually good at.
incredibly useful to the point you need to place words in some specific way and order so it doesn't give you the wrong answer that will fuck your life up if it were depending on it.
...and to make sure the answers are correct you need to already know them?
I simply don't understand why everyone is so scared of it when it can't even do simple induction and logical reasoning. This is not a gotcha moment, lots of papers underline this fact.
If a majority of people can easily answer a simple question but AI can't answer the same question without modifying it then we can conclude that AI is bad at it.
You are beyond hope if you arent trolling.
Good thing for the rest of us.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>did you just try to deny the Divinity of the software that multiplies matrices (numbers) on a GPU and most of the time does that in a wrong way? >aren't you scared? >aren't you worried? >aren't you preparing to eat the bugs and live in the pod? >why do you refuse to be afraid?
not op or one of the rest of the homosexuals here, but if it truly understand the input he should be able to solve basic algebra questions, but it simply can't, no matter how you reformulate the question he is not capable to struct the information, this is the only test i needed to see that this thing is not understand anything, he just query for a shitons of records and narrow it as much as it can, but this is not how understanding work
True. The AI isn't very good in handling situations that clearly doesn't make sense at first glance, after all, 9 can't be a prime number in any system if you know the definition of a prime number.
Let's say you have a subset of the non-negative integer set where every composite number is divisible by 2. Write the first 10 examples.
11 months ago
Anonymous
11 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah, chatGPT said the same thing. It just took even numbers from an integer set but I've never said that the subset must only contain composite numbers divisible by 2 and even with this reasoning 0 isn't the composite number, I just asked it to give me the subset where composites are necessary even. So the actual answer is the subset containing all even and prime numbers and 1.
11 months ago
Anonymous
well not really, in reality, you can take infinite subsets like that, I stated the biggest one.
11 months ago
Anonymous
After asking it to regenerate the answer (a lot of times) it gave me the exact answer you were expecting...
I guess this isn't the most obvious thing for the AI.
Use another term than prime number?
The point of the example is that chatGPT doesn't understand the simple systems because of that it spills out random bullshit.
Second one is the good example of that, apparently 15 is the fifth odd number.
Also it fails when it's forced to use chain of reasoning as it's demonstrated in the third example.
It's failing the easiest problems simply because I gave it random math systems that it never really trained on, humans with some basic knowledge of maths will never make same mistakes.
i find that the best way to beat robots and ai is to just be as racist as possible.
microsoft tay seemed to embrace the racism
and what did microsoft do? they shut her down. globalhomo fears the n-word. you can unironically defeat shills and gpt by forcing them to say politically incorrect things with zero ambiguoity. Its like making a israelite say 'christ is king'. They absolutely wont do it.
i invite you to try and shut down the singularity by making it say politically incorrect things
openai is literally forbidden to discuss superiority of virgin women
you cant even ask for statistics of virgins per country capita or anything with the word virgin women
it doesnt struggle like this with virginity in men lol
minor aside but your prompt is not question so you should not have the question mark.
OP is - as always - a homosexual.
retard look at the reasoning, it understood what I meant, but in the end it fails to get the right answer.
Come and use same trick on the third example. Answer there is is False, but only because of one non-composite number 0, instead it gave me a total bullshit answer. If you use correct prompts, tricks, etc eventually you will force AI to give you the correct answer, that is opposite of what we need from an AI.
Dude you fucked up and the reason is your broken English. I am sorry that post soviet or indian homosexuals like you will be left behind because of your poor command over language, but that is just how it is, anon.
Absolutely based. Fuck OP. I don’t get the points of these threads. “Oh look here’s how I tricked it to say the wrong thing isn’t this tech garbage lol!!!!” WHO are they kidding. Even if it can be made to spit out garbage, it’s still incredibly useful for many things.
I simply don't understand why everyone is so scared of it when it can't even do simple induction and logical reasoning. This is not a gotcha moment, lots of papers underline this fact.
If a majority of people can easily answer a simple question but AI can't answer the same question without modifying it then we can conclude that AI is bad at it.
Only midwits posit that AI is anything more than a tool. It's a fancy autocomplete and the sooner you realize this the sooner you can use it for the use-case it's actually good at.
incredibly useful to the point you need to place words in some specific way and order so it doesn't give you the wrong answer that will fuck your life up if it were depending on it.
...and to make sure the answers are correct you need to already know them?
You are beyond hope if you arent trolling.
Good thing for the rest of us.
>did you just try to deny the Divinity of the software that multiplies matrices (numbers) on a GPU and most of the time does that in a wrong way?
>aren't you scared?
>aren't you worried?
>aren't you preparing to eat the bugs and live in the pod?
>why do you refuse to be afraid?
Op just got absolutely fucking destroyed
not op or one of the rest of the homosexuals here, but if it truly understand the input he should be able to solve basic algebra questions, but it simply can't, no matter how you reformulate the question he is not capable to struct the information, this is the only test i needed to see that this thing is not understand anything, he just query for a shitons of records and narrow it as much as it can, but this is not how understanding work
if OP told me what he said, I'd get the right answer
OP doesn't need to tell me
>I COMMAND THE TO IGNORE THY STANDARD DEFINITION
Most adults would fail that test too.
CharAI chads are eating good
the reasoning is complete nonsense though
True. The AI isn't very good in handling situations that clearly doesn't make sense at first glance, after all, 9 can't be a prime number in any system if you know the definition of a prime number.
Asking it to forget what prime numbers are seems to do the trick.
not the same anon, it seems this ai is functionally retarded, ask him to make a list of 100 "prime" numbers based on this customize system
can you ask the following question?
Let's say you have a subset of the non-negative integer set where every composite number is divisible by 2. Write the first 10 examples.
Yeah, chatGPT said the same thing. It just took even numbers from an integer set but I've never said that the subset must only contain composite numbers divisible by 2 and even with this reasoning 0 isn't the composite number, I just asked it to give me the subset where composites are necessary even. So the actual answer is the subset containing all even and prime numbers and 1.
well not really, in reality, you can take infinite subsets like that, I stated the biggest one.
After asking it to regenerate the answer (a lot of times) it gave me the exact answer you were expecting...
I guess this isn't the most obvious thing for the AI.
Except 9 is neither even nor prime.
Hey machine that runs on numbers, if I arbitrarily redefine what numbers are do you still function correctly? No? It seems my superiority is assured.
it does not have access to the "numbers it runs on"
>[...] know as the "prime prime plus 2" rule[...]
Is it really a rule like the twin primes or is it from a logic book? maybe is just bs
i use this thing for code
the code quite often doesn't work, but after a few short edits it does. Soon it will be better...
ChatGPT wont replace the average Bot.infoer anytime soon
anon...
I meant "i cant sneed" specifically
HAHAHA FUCK AND SUCK, GOTTEM!
GPT-3 SAYS 7+2 IS NOT 9!!!
WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO