So artists are literally KILLING THEMSELVES and you still support AI art?

So artists are literally KILLING THEMSELVES and you still support AI art?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    please stop, i can only get so erect

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Deadittors lel

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why do we hate artists?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So if someone doesn't piss in jars, you'd be more sympathetic?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but yeah, there is nothing artistic about a jar of piss or a banana taped to a wall. Anyone who says otherwise deserves the rope

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It doesn't take much to post edit ai work also how are you going to reliably determine what is AI created?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >artists are total buttholes in general
        Says the one who claims to relish in schadenfreude against a group of people they don't even know or likely have ever interacted with in their lives, on a generalization that's not all that well thought out in the first place.

        Literally like saying: "I want to replace all coders because all coders are smelly nerds who think they're superior because they code in C instead of Rust." Literally an echo box argument without any nuance, made by someone who just hates artists because they saw a couple memes about modern art.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This reads like an AI trained on female reddit posts

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            This post reads like a GPT3 generated post fine-tune specifically on low effort shitposts.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >mirroring
              See the mind of a self described artist
              Can only mimic and parasitize

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Cope seethe and fart, furry porn paintpig

            >no argument
            Kek, so this is the power of AI "artists"?
            You are children playing with toys literally powered on art made by others.
            You have zero say in anything which constitutes art. You don't make it. Simple.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You “argue” like A.I.
              Mimicking and parasitizing
              Your arguments are weak
              Simple you’re the proverbial fart

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Your arguments are weak
                Says the one without an argument.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your personality is disgusting
                That you turned your disgusting ego into a livelihood illustrates the beauty of natural selection
                Bye bye turd

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Completely non creative, ineffective arguments
              Non productive, entirely parasitic
              This is why A.I. is replacing you
              Because you choose to act like a robot, but you’re not even useful like one

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You are children playing with toys literally powered on art made by others.
              We might as well be. You, however, ARE the toy powered on art made by others.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You are children playing with toys
              So, Artists ?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The AI is no different than any human artist. It was trained by studying art. It learned how to classify and qualify art. Now it makes new art based on what it learned.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The AI learned to combine a bunch of images together without cognitive direction, only verbal guidance and 1s and 0s.
                The AI is not the prompter, just like the AI is not the artist. A good distinction to make when you're talking about art, a reflection of the artist.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This. AI isn't even AI. It's an algorithm.
                It would be like telling Alexa to make a playlist of your favorite songs. It follows an algorithm from Spotify or Apple Music and spits out what it thinks you'll like, with no concern over itself or you. It's not intelligent in that regard, just a data combination algorithm. But in this regard, it's trying to emulate the music in the playlist, rather than simply assemble it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Cope seethe and fart, furry porn paintpig

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >their lives
          He or she

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Their their is a correct word to use here because it's unknown whether it's a he or a she.
            >inb4 no grulzzzz on the interwepz

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I went to a liberal arts school and I can safely say that all artists are whiny homosexuals, even the right wing ones.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Also I agree with

          This reads like an AI trained on female reddit posts

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          while I'm not getting any schadenfreude out of this I'll just mention that I've interacted with plenty of artists and it generally hasn't been pleasant

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Literally like saying: "I want to replace all coders because all coders are smelly nerds who think they're superior because they code in C instead of Rust."
          Have you been on Twitter? That's pretty much what all the artist c**ts were saying when they heard ChatGPT might be able to replace programmers. They're a bunch of hostile c**ts for no reason other than they're miserable and entitled. You rarely see that same shit attitude with musicians or other types of creatives, it's always the fricking artists.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            This.
            I didn't see writers get butthurt when the language transformative models started rolling out.
            I don't remember musicians throwing a hissy fit when AI jukeboxes started rolling out years ago.
            It is now only artists acting like the world is fricking ending and skynet is coming when the same happens with images now.
            Bunch of unlikable c**ts, seeing from all the interactions with artists I've had in here and outside this place.

            • 1 year ago
              SidR

              >Bunch of unlikable c**ts, seeing from all the interactions with artists I've had in here and outside this place.
              They're all so entitled, too. Boo hoo I might not get to live my dream of being an artist because of AI, which is first of all just such a fricking cuck mentality, and second of all, that's just how life is for artists. Every single musician I know is either a full-time teacher, or does music on the side next to their real job. The writers I know are working on building an audience while being a salaryman.
              These people are never good enough to art teachers, they just want to be paid to doodle like a child forever. Pic fricking related, one of these "professional artists" AI is going to replace (and that's a good thing).

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Both are true. Artists and coders deserve to be automated away.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This anon explained it to me so that I could understand it. I would like to thank him. I was just thinking about this yesterday. What is the source of life energy, so to speak, that created it? I wasn't so sure. But with that attitude I can see that it clearly is the prompter.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >First, any time someone is butthurt like this it is funny.

        Everyone for the 'democratization' of art via AI renderers has to be fricking moronic. I have seen no good argument for it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what argument, anyone can use it and make "art" now instead of years of training... assuming they can fix shit like hands and stuff
          there is no voting involved, the end goal of ai image generation is total replacement of artgays in the commercial sector... it just isn't able to yet

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >the end goal of ai image generation is total replacement of artgays in the commercial sector... it just isn't able to yet

            That's isn't the point, moron. It is whether you want to establish that precedent, and take that power out of the hands of the individuals who produce the art, and fork it over to corporations, and the government in particular. But I don't expect english-speakers to be able to think that far.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >fork it over to corporations
              and yet artshits were silent when Dalle2 was revealed over a year ago... and only started b***hing when individual anons using an open source software started pumping out waifu shit that directly competed with them on online galleries... how curious

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Modern art is post modern leftist bullshit. It needs to be destroyed.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Contemporary Fine Art is going to be completely unaffected by AI

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >leftist bullshit.
        moronic, it's there for tax-dodging embezzlement scams, they will just use ai like anything else:
        https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2022/11/17/moma-ai-art/

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This all looks like shit. NVidia can't even prompt correctly.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's Art, looking good has nothing to do with "Art."
            Only uneducated plebs care about shit looking pretty.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              There is no back story to these. It's generated in 3 seconds by a computer. If it doesn't look good, then it has nothing going for it and therefore is shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                t. pleb

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe so. Explain one of them to me. Where's the Art?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I need a backstory for Art
                >explain it to me
                filtered

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                sasuga, gay
                I fell for your shitposts, hilarious
                me on the left

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you don't explain art, idiot, you just put money into it if you are rich enough

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't hate artists, especially the ones who I follow on Twitter. I hate the luddites who slow technological progress because it's finally their turn to have something making big progress in their domains, but they want to hold back that back at everyone else's expense. A lot of those people are artists though, but it's no the artist part I hate

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        luddites deserve the rope

        this is not a technology that will benefit you or 99% of humanity, at least not in the long term. And that long term maybe be shorter, and come around sooner, then you think.

        For one, if you're working in tech you're about to lose your job to it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          okay, have a nice day

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            why?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Why not? Ai can replace your shit posts.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It will benefit humanity, you’re just too dishonest to admit it and you’d rather keep the majority of earth servile and miserable for your degenerate needs and whims.

          We’re already ruled by sociopathic pedophiles who murder and torture people for fun. Might as well give real AI a chance.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >It will benefit humanity, you’re just too dishonest to admit it and you’d rather keep the majority of earth servile and miserable for your degenerate needs and whims.
            not at all, I'm not talking what I want. I'm talking about what I don't want.

            >We’re already ruled by sociopathic pedophiles who murder and torture people for fun.
            And they're going to magically become benign because AI? Listen to yourself anon. And I'm not even sold on the idea that all of the elite are pedovores but I'm supposed to be the cynical one here.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Arguing that we should dig holes with bare hands rather than shovels is simply a moronic take.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not saying we should not utilise the technology. I'm saying we don't get to decide whether we can. And that we are probably not going to be given access to it , I mean, that we are not going to be given access to the majority of its capabilities or at the very least its strongest capabilities, is certain.

                Simply because this technology replaces anything we are economically useful or necessary for.

                So like, consider coca cola. A massive industry devoted to unnecessary, unhealthy consumables, basically very cheap luxury items.
                It's all propped up on the ability for the masses, even the dirt poorest to at least occasionally purchase their products.

                Companies like that are either going to massively contract or go out of existence.
                Sure, its massively profitable, but the people at the very top of a company like Coke, those who are able to keep the largest profits for themselves, don't give a shit if the entire company goes out of existence or massively contracts and changes into something very different or at least, its not going to be a problem for them.

                Those kinds of people are going to see the writing on the wall for the future of the economy and the work force and realise they'd better hold onto all the money and assets they can.

                Confectionaries are no longer going to be available on that scale simply because the vast majority of people are no longer going to be able to afford frivolous shit like that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                and thats basically the story for the vast majority of consumer goods and services availabe right now.

                They are all propped up by our labour. But AI not only means the companies providing these goods and services no longer need a human work force, it also means that they no longer have a market as big as they used to.

                Any company providing anything to consumers will have a pool of consumers only as big as the wealthiest in society.

                There will be way less consumers, but they will have way more money then most consumers currently do..if money exists at all. Why not just have your money free luxury communist utopia for the elite.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Dude, it's just computer programs. You completely missed the memo that the developers of AI are open source communists. So far OpenAI has published papers about how to replicate their AI. We're already seeing a massive industry forming around renting GPUs for making and training AI.

                Also if AI is gatekept like you say it's going to be then we have nothing to worry about. For example, Google allegedly has an amazing AI yet we have yet to see anything from it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You completely missed the memo that the developers of AI are open source communists. So far OpenAI has published papers about how to replicate their AI.
                availabe via these things we're talking to each other now called computers, and the internet, which cost money, and are powered by eletricity.

                There's no open source for a person living in abject poverty or anyone who just for whatever reason doesn't have access to a computer or the internet.

                The developers of AI are going to be the only people left in the tech industry and they're going to be wealthy and powerful. You don't think they realise that what they've developed is going to exclude most people from the work force and having a decent life, and put themselves into an extremely privileged position? It doesn't mean they're nefarious, but faced with the option of being in our position or theirs, what do you think they're going to choose? They've created a monster and they see what the implications of it are.

                >So far OpenAI has published papers about how to replicate their AI. We're already seeing a massive industry forming around renting GPUs for making and training AI.
                You need resources and money to do any of those things and we don't get to decide whether we have access to the requisite resources and money.

                The military is going to be one of the very few fields of employment. They are going to form an important part of the upper / over class. They're going to be faced with the alternative of, tow the line and follow the orders you're given or join the majority in their desperate and miserable position.

                They are most likely going to be taking property and resources from people and preventing them from acquiring property and resources.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >or anyone who just for whatever reason doesn't have access to a computer or the internet.
                Black person fricking cobalt-mining slaves in Ghana have cell phones now, the frick are you talking about?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And they're still cobalt mining slaves. And they wouldn't be able to do shit if the powers that be decided not to allow them to have phones anymore.

                The fact that cobalt mining slaves exist at all demonstrates that we ourselves are screwed and destined for that life as well.

                I mean, you don't do anything to help them or really care about them. What makes you think someone with more money, power and privelage then you, will give a shit about you if you fall into a similar position, and not just allow it to happen, and live off of your misery to prop up their quality of life.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your last argument was btfo and now you have to focus on how we're not helping fricking African slaves (conveniently ignoring the billions in aid American taxpayers have collectively spent trying to help people in those corrupt countries)? The point was that in free countries even people in total poverty have access to unlimited information which makes your argument moronic.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >(conveniently ignoring the billions in aid American taxpayers have collectively spent trying to help people in those corrupt countries)?
                And notice how it doesn't lift any of them out of their situation?
                Thats because it has to go through the hands of the most powerful in their countries.
                Notice how when the powerful have the means to help the masses and lift them up they choose to hold onto those means and keep them for themselves as well? They hoard it all for themselves.

                Its really no different anywhere in the world. The rich get richer the poor, at best, stay poor.

                BOT used to be full of people well acquainted with how fundamentally unfair life and the world is.

                Now its starting to look like its full of normies who've spent their lives coasting along the normie "flow of life" (have you seen that anti-self imporvement infographic / meme?)
                People fully benefiting from the privelages of a first world middle class society.

                I mean there was a time when BOT was at least a place for the outcasts and rejects of the privileged first world middle class, but now you're all straight up brads

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >and keep them for themselves as well?
                *keep them for themselves instead

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What the frick is your point? Go back to digging ditches with our hands? The frick are you even talking about other than just rambling about how powerful people take the most for themselves, like yeah no fricking shit. What do you want people to do, what exactly are you yourself doing besides b***hing about things on fricking BOT?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >What the frick is your point? Go back to digging ditches with our hands?
                You're stuck on what we should do, obviously we shouldn't do that.
                I'm talking about what is actually going to happen. Yes, automation is going to dig the ditches for us. And that means no more human ditch diggers. Ditto for every single other job that humans currently do.

                >The frick are you even talking about other than just rambling about how powerful people take the most for themselves, like yeah no fricking shit.
                Right. So thats whats going to continue to happen with AI, just on steroids.
                Life as you and me know it is absolutely doomed. This is the final nail in the coffin of the middle class. Inequality is going to rise sharply, the gap between the wealthy and the poor is about to expand beyond your wildest dreams.

                >What do you want people to do,
                *shrugs* I have no idea what the frick to do. But at least I'm confronting the reality. That is the first thing people are going to need to do before finding any sort of way forward IF there is one. I personally don't see how there could be any happy ending to this.

                If you think reading my posts is schizo wait until awareness of this technology spreads throughout society and panic sets in.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                AI apologists only have a point regarding AI art for as long as ONLY art gets automated, we find something that can make it cheaper and good enough, so there's no point in having the old thing anymore. These sort of changes happened progressively at different rates in different industries, in that situation "lol just make something that makes you money" is a valid response, however, this is coming for all industries and whatever you want to happen with your industry should be what you see in artists.
                If you want gay communism, you should want gay communism for artists right now, because if you set a precedent on which you can profit from the massively collected data of a group of people and monetize it against them with no compensation, then that's exactly what's going to happen to you, and you'll be left to starve along everyone else that isn't part of the elite right now.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you'll be left to starve along everyone else
                If we only need human labor for upkeeping the machines that do 95% of the work for 3000% less cost, I would very happily accept a 95% reduction of the human population. What's happening instead is a welfare explosion.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not even hopeful there will even be UBI. We're just going to be left to fend for ourselves.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No we aren't. We'd lynch every politician overnight if that happened. If they run out of gibs, they are 100% fricked.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                this isn't the 1800's, nobody is getting lynched. You're also conveniently ignoring that any sort of violent revolution is going to be absolutely pointless and ineffective thanks to the defense capabilities that AI is going to provide. None of which the masses will have access to.

                But, all of that aside.
                Do you see indians violently lynching their politicians? No. Millions live in abject poverty and absolute squalor, the government provides no support and they get away with it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're right that it's not guaranteed people will do anything. If enough people want to do so though its not hard. Disabling the power grid is pretty easy, know I read a post here somewhere about that.
                I think if there's a dramatic collapse that makes 70% of people start living on rats and bugs in a week they'll will be quick to fricking burn buildings just given the attitudes and politics we have. Maybe propagandists have the power to make it happen slowly enough so no one ever gets oppressed enough to try and organize.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >*shrugs* I have no idea what the frick to do. But at least I'm confronting the reality
                What you're doing is thinking you're superior for expecting doom and gloom, just like everybody else that does the same. When things eventually turn out okay and you're still stuck in the same place because you think trying is hopeless, you'll blame the system instead of your paralyzing fear and insecurity.
                Me, I'm just learning how to use AI. Sink or swim b***h.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                AI will do anything you try to do with it better than you.
                It can already prompt better than you.
                "learning how to use ai" lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >When things eventually turn out okay and you're still stuck in the same place because you think trying is hopeless, you'll blame the system instead of your paralyzing fear and insecurity.
                Me, I'm just learning how to use AI. Sink or swim b***h.
                and what the frick are you going to do if I'm right.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >and what the frick are you going to do if I'm right.
                What the frick are you going to do if an asteroid hits the world and kills everybody tomorrow, or if another mega-pandemic happens, or if the USA becomes a technophobic fascist Amish nation? Fricking nothing, because you can't control everything. Stop worrying about shit you can't control, and focus on the things you can.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >if this tool doesn't help them it is worthless.
                Does that make a shovel pointless if some idiot cant figure out how to dig into the earth with it?
                >doesn't lift any of them out of poverty
                How the frick would you know? I have met plenty of poor kids(including myself) who use old shitty hardware and ipen source solutions since we can't afford shit. It made us better at computers since we had the tools available to learn. If we didn't have open source we would basically never try since the tools were not there.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >What makes you think someone with more money, power and privelage then you, will give a shit about you if you fall into a similar position, and not just allow it to happen, and live off of your misery to prop up their quality of life.
                NTA but because I know that nobody will help me, I'm not foolish enough to try and stand in the way of technological progress, and make the effort to keep up with it. Your argument can be used for every other technological advancement that led to automation, and just like all the other narcissistic artist c**ts, you didn't give a shit until it happened to you. Frick off, technology is amazing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not an artist and I agree that technology is amazing.

                AI is unlike any other advance in technology from the past though. This is the end of the line for most of us.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh my goodness, I cannot believe what you just said! It's like you completely missed the whole point of my concerns about artificial intelligence. Just because some of the developers of AI are open source and publish papers about how to replicate their work, it doesn't mean there won't be any problems with who gets to control and use this technology. Like, just think about it, who has the resources to rent all those fancy GPUs for making and training AI? It's certainly not going to be the average Joe or Jane.

                And just because Google hasn't released any major AI products yet, that doesn't mean they don't have some super advanced AI tucked away somewhere. They could be keeping it all secret and hush-hush, you know? Plus, just because someone calls themselves an "open-source communist" doesn't mean the big tech companies or their investors will follow suit. It's all about making money, and that's not always going to align with what's best for society.

                In conclusion, just because some people make their AI developments open-source, it doesn't mean that the control and distribution of AI technology will be democratic and fair. We still have to be vigilant and make sure that the power and control of AI doesn't fall into the wrong hands.

                ---

                I like ChatGPT as a debate partner more. You just sound like a schizo.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I like ChatGPT as a debate partner more.
                you must be ok with losing the debate then.

                >You just sound like a schizo.
                Its starting to concern me how low the bar is for anons to start calling somebody schizo now.
                The world is a mad place, have you considered that a person who honestly ponders and confronts that madness and takes it into consideration may come across as mad? The madness is still a reality. Schizo suggests someone who is out of touch with reality.

                It didn't use to be like this on BOT and thats probably because you're all zoomers now. Millenials and gen xers were way less sheltered then you guys are.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon I can say without a doubt that you are not a fully functioning individual contributing to society and that's due to your mental illness.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                correct, but you don't actually have any arguments against what I'm saying.

                Nothing I'm saying is irrational - you've just surmised that I'm troubled and isolated, with a lot of time on my hands.

                If only you knew how bad things really are. Must be nice to have a job to go to and friends to keep you placated and distracted .

                The homeless man rambling on the street corner may be psychotic but he's still more in touch with and exposed to the harsh realities of this world.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No your inability to process information like a normal person makes you incapable of making judgments that are useful. Everything is biased by your schizo delusions so every topic simply ends up swirling around your bias. Further, you're actually incapable of maintaining incoherency, you ramble and can't keep your points straight. This makes you useless to talk to and why ChatGPT is way better at being the counter argument.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Everything is biased by your schizo delusions
                please point out what is delusional and how its delusional.

                >every topic simply ends up swirling around your bias.
                welcome to every debate ever.

                >Further, you're actually incapable of maintaining incoherency, you ramble and can't keep your points straight.
                no, its just too complicated for your verbal IQ. What you don't understand and what is too complex for you, looks incoherent to you.
                This is BOT after all, I really should be discussing this on BOT or BOT.

                >This makes you useless to talk to and why ChatGPT is way better at being the counter argument.
                ChatGPT just made my points in language thats more simple for you to understand. But it basically just looks like a less intelligent person trying to say what I'm saying. Read a book goy

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe your bias against AI is based on the knowledge that if society was run by AI you would be taken off the internet because your inability to cope with reality is solely based on your chronic internet use.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >your inability to cope with reality is solely based on your chronic internet use.
                Not solely but its probably a big contributor.

                To me, though, denial demonstrates less of an ability to cope with reality then what I am demonstrating with my "schizo ramblings".

                Look at the seven stages of grief. As you progress along those stages, you come to terms with reality more.
                Right now you, and like, seemingly nearly all developers, are at the denial stage.
                What you may be perceiving as mental instability, could just be you picking up on my stress associated with the later stages of the greiving process.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You completely missed the memo that the developers of AI are open source communists.
                but they don't get to make the rules do they. No way are the people powerful enough to actually make the rules going to implement anything like a communist utopia.

                There will simply be no motive or incentive for them to help or benefit us in anyway because we will not be needed for anything and we will be no threat to them. They can just safely ignore our plight and miserable existence just like we in the first worlders go about our privelaged and comfy lives safely ignoring the pit of shit that the vast majority of the world lives. Oh, and actually benefiting off their exploitation and basically relying on their exploitation to prop up our standard of living.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm very impressed with Google lately

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yea but i dont have to drink coke. I can drink a cheap knock off version of it or learn to make it myself.
                Same shit with this.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the average person will be able to create beautiful artwork from their imagination with the assistance of AI and this is a bad thing
          If artists can't figure out how to use AI to make their own artwork better then they deserve to be replaced.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >a subset of computer vision will not improve your life at all, goyim
          go frick yourself

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You're right computer vision has many useful applications
            It will benefit government surveillance, advertisers, spammers, identity thieves and autonomous killing machines.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              And I'll be the one doing all of those. Lucky me huh? Eat shit, homosexual

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yer probably too stupid for those jobs anyway, they need an systems engineer to oversee thousands of those, not a moron controlling each one

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >but they want to hold back that back at everyone else's expense.
        you understand that this is at their expense right?
        and by this i don't mean that "artists are becoming obsolete" (they aren't), i mean that you are quite literally building this upon their backs.

        it's honestly bizarre reading all these criticisms against artists. it all seems like projection. look at this thread: every single post talking about how hostile artists are are extremely hostile towards artists themselves. every post talking about how artists are entitled acts extremely entitled towards their own usage of AI art.
        at least have some appreciation for this shit. the only reason any of it can look good is because somebody figured out how to make it look good.

        i feel like artists should be pitied. yet i always see these weird inflammatory threads on here that try to paint the picture as if artists are trying to frick you over.
        >So artists are literally KILLING THEMSELVES and you still support AI art?
        in reality they are just trying to protect themselves. if AI could make anything from scratch then it'd be a different issue.
        they should also be pitied because what they're doing is pointless. it's like fighting progress, or fighting piracy.
        instead thread like these wank themselves raw over the fact that these morons are doing something completely pointless. it's bizzare to me.

        Is AI art really affecting them in any practical sense?
        It looks like most of their woes are self-inflicted from the thought of AI taking over art.
        But I don't follow art outside of the boorus and even then I don't really care.

        Actually, how do these nerds make money in the first place? Are they really just living off commissions? Do they bag groceries on the side?
        They don't just produce still images with no purpose other to exist right? They must be doing art for video games, some kind of graphic design stuff, or merchandise for brands, right??

        >Is AI art really affecting them in any practical sense?
        obviously, yes. not the truly skilled ones because it will just be a tool for us. but people who are at a low-level (or are just generic) will have their skills completely invalidated because the average schmuck will be able to match them in skill level just by using AI.

        • 1 year ago
          SidR

          >every post talking about how artists are entitled acts extremely entitled towards their own usage of AI art.
          If you'd participated in artist twitter, DeviantArt or Tumblr at any point in the past 20 years you'd know that the artists have been entitled c**ts since forever, which is why people have no issue behaving that way right back at them.
          >i mean that you are quite literally building this upon their backs
          Everything everybody makes it built on the backs of others. Nobody acts like this except artists.
          >the only reason any of it can look good is because somebody figured out how to make it look good
          The only reason 95% of the artists complaining even have a job is because of nerds in the 90s that made Photoshop and with it made creating art accessible to more people. This is the same thing, but this time it won't benefit them immediately so they hate it. That's just childish.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Everything everybody makes it built on the backs of others.
            but not quite in such a direct way. photoshop can't do anything to a blank canvas. it's not the foundation of any art, it's truly just a tool.
            meanwhile AI is built directly on the back of artists. you pick and choose and essentially steal from them to create your own thing. this is not comparable at all. if artists complain about plagiarism, of course they will complain about this.

            now the process isn't all that dissimilar from just a human artist taking inspiration (taking, stealing) from another artist(s). which is why ultimately this is fine, as long as it stays out of plagiarism and stealing territory.

            still, it is dishonest to compare this process to photoshop and similar things.
            you are not making something new USING the foundation they created, you are using their work AS the foundation for your work. except in this case you aren't even using your own expertise to filter their work, you're making the AI do that.

            i went on a tangent here but ultimately i'm just trying to say that most of the people ITT have no room to berate artists for their entitlement or hostility. it doesn't make you any more likeable than the morons you are trying to paint as the devil here.
            threads like these just lead to more stupid binary thinking and tribalism.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >but not quite in such a direct way. photoshop can't do anything to a blank canvas
              Well sampling's a thing in music, that's been fine for decades and everybody does it. That just wasn't possible with art due to Disney's stranglehold on all things visual copyright. What artists don't realize is that the way things are is NOT how things are meant to be, you're not meant to be able to hold onto copyright for decades and centuries, it's supposed to encourage people to create new things, instead of profiting off of old creations for eternity. The only reason people look at it as stealing is because of the way The Mouse has shaped copyright and visual trademarks.
              So philosophically, unless it's a model trained specifically to emulate the style of a single artist in order to impersonate them, then no, it's not plagiarism and artists have nothing to complain about.
              >except in this case you aren't even using your own expertise to filter their work, you're making the AI do that
              You remind me of what my art teacher used to say back when photoshop and CGI was gaining traction around the year 2000, that's it's not real creativity, it's not real art, it's the computer doing everything. Almost word for word, it's incredible.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You remind me of what my art teacher used to say back when photoshop and CGI was gaining traction around the year 2000, that's it's not real creativity, it's not real art, it's the computer doing everything. Almost word for word, it's incredible.
                except what i said is completely true while your art teacher is a moron. in fact my entire post is about the difference in photoshop as a tool vs AI so that you'd make this point is boggling my mind.

                and by the way, i'm not saying it's not real creativity or anything like that. there is no such thing really anyway.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They have been bad allies in the fight against automation for us wagies and laborers. Frick em.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >bad allies

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I just find it funny after years and years of
      >machines might take your job but mine will always be safe *draws some doodles and calls it art*
      yet now it looks like machines will take the jobs of artists before they can even replace burger flippers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i only hate digital art(ist)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i only hate artists that don't draw dicky

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        An Elder walks among us.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >tfw you can feed the AI all the drawings of anti dicky artists
        >tfw you can generate dicky in their artstyle and they won't be able to do anything about it
        I love AI.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm a software dev. I have a comfy, high paying, low-stress job. I'm both very excited and fearful about AI. Excited from all the possibilities. But very fearful because people are saying AI is starting to take over software dev jobs next. I'd say maybe 10-15 more years until my job is completely eliminated similarly to how AI has eliminated artists'.
      However, the one difference between artists and software devs are that we don't cry and whine and try to ban AI.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm a software dev. I have a comfy, high paying, low-stress job. I'm both very excited and fearful about AI. Excited from all the possibilities. But very fearful because people are saying AI is starting to take over software dev jobs next. I'd say maybe 10-15 more years until my job is completely eliminated similarly to how AI has eliminated artists'.
        typical BOT shitter LARPing as a dev
        99% of people on BOT and reddit dont know how AI works and if they do they are dishonest about it, go frick yourself

        inb4 "frick you *insert artist insult* "

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Lol cope and seethe low-pay wagie.
          AI now is nowhere near able to replace us software devs. That's why I said 10-15 years given how fast AI improves.
          If anything, it'll eliminate lower level software devs which obviously will affect us (lower wages/benefits because of supply vs demand, even more competition, etc).

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That's nothing. I remember the year of the Snowden like it was yesterday.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      only hate the morons overreacting like the sky is falling
      really your art should stand out even more now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they laughed when blue collar people got replaced by AI now that it affects them its the end of the world

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't, I just know they are chronic drama queens and won't feed into it by giving them attention

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't hate them. I just hate the snarky ones on Twitter who post basic ass shit then get angry and scream if their mid art which they released to the public for free is reposted or used as a pfp or anything. They demand way too much money and think their art is special.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >scream if their mid art which they released to the public for free is reposted or used as a pfp or anything.
        Damn it you're supposed to go to their Patreon and pay their living wage to see the rest not share their ads and certainly not use it to train an AI on it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why do we hate artists?
      Self-hate is a common thing.
      t. artist

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      only art I enjoy comes from Japan and dead people, westcucks can all go hang, I don't care

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I hate ALL luddites, regardless of profession. One of my best friends is n artist and he's not a homosexual twitter-luddite.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is AI art really affecting them in any practical sense?
    It looks like most of their woes are self-inflicted from the thought of AI taking over art.
    But I don't follow art outside of the boorus and even then I don't really care.

    Actually, how do these nerds make money in the first place? Are they really just living off commissions? Do they bag groceries on the side?
    They don't just produce still images with no purpose other to exist right? They must be doing art for video games, some kind of graphic design stuff, or merchandise for brands, right??

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Most artists produce shovelware unoriginal shit and can't compete against automation because they lack creativity and don't really add value. The artists are not worried because AI is just another tool, like a camera. The people that are worried are the illustrators, self dubbed "artists" that only do the tasks their employer or client ask them.
      They are the equivalent of manual labor getting replaced by robots and they are desperate because they thought they were irreplaceable and now an algo is making them obsolete. They are so far up their asses they don't have any other skill

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        But has there been cases of people getting fired and replaced with AI yet?
        I think it's pretty dumb to go all baby mode on the internet over something that hasn't even happened. I'll be more fine with them whining if their fears are actually being realized.
        But, I guess you're right. They are a bunch of whiners, it takes a special kind of person to become an "artist."

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They are scared because they are looking at a computer progream that does something just like them instantly for almost nothing. It is just a matter of time

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's only a matter of time until factories are run by robots but THAT still hasn't happened yet. Imagine if you were betting your life savings on self-driving cars that have been "around the corner" for the last 10 years and probably have another 10 years to go. That's half a career's worth of time, imagine not being a truck driver in 2012 because you heard of automated trucks.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm a CNC programmer/setup/operator and the automation technology out there now is amazing, but I don't fear for my job and my salary only goes up.
              There has never been an automated system that doesn't require human oversight. AI won't generate art or any other kind of product for itself, it's prompted by a human for a human audience. Only the lazy artists are complaining because theyve had it so good, but in reality we haven't seen any new artists emerge in the western world for decades.
              What happened to beautiful architecture? My city has suburban sections built in the 50s with scenic art deco homes, new sections are square cutout series of townhouses built cheaply and perfectly with the same prefabricated grey rock facades.
              What happened to the amazing looking cars? You could tell what year a car was from by its looks between the 50s and the 80s, but todays cars dont look that different from what we had in the 90s unless theyre unaffordable supercars or teslas.
              What happened to fashion? Computer programmers used to show up to work with suits and trimmed beards. Now they have nose rings, blue hair and ripped tee shirts.
              Frick modern art and artists. They deserve to be replaced for the eyesores they have surrounded us with for so long.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                gay

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So your idea to bring back artistic creativity is to turn all art into input parameters and make a machine produce it? Where is your art, bro? Show me your works. What traditional artists do you follow? Your false indignation is a mask for your resentment. That's all these arguments ever boil down to. You are full of hatred, so you want to savor the pain of others. This isn't necessarily about bringing back the artistic movements of the past. It's that contrarians like you are pissed off at the world but see no way to restore it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're screaming at the wrong tree, in the wrong forest, in the wrong country.
                lmao

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not running a company or anything but I'm already planning to use it to create character portraits and textures for games, then use ChatGPT or something to develop backstories for them, all things that I probably would have hired someone to make at some point. Then again maybe I won't ever finish it either so who cares.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >But has there been cases of people getting fired and replaced with AI yet?
          I work as an artist in the game industry and no I haven't heard of anything like that.
          But most professional artists I know primarily do 3D CG and AI doesn't really do that yet.
          There hasn't been much demand for painterly 2D art in a commercial sense in a long time. If you do that stuff you most likely do it as a hobby. At most you might have a side hustle doing furry porn or something. I draw as a hobby too. I'm not going to stop in a post-AI world, because I actually enjoy doing it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >But has there been cases of people getting fired and replaced with AI yet?
          none what do ever
          it's just hysteria
          ai isn't good enough to replace any professional

          but
          it is good enough to replace patroen coom artgays by lesser artgays/amateurs who can fix up hands though

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        But this isn't true. The actual valuable artists who work at eg video game companies and shit have always seen it as their job to solve art problems, not just produce art. I don't tell them to draw x and y, I tell them go figure out how big the furniture grid should be so it still feels comfortable on screen. Or figure out whether the icons will get too busy if we show the character class on a map pin, etc. Those are the ones who see AI as just another tool and will flourish

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just delusional energy all around. The "AI" shit is more so another tool than a replacement. Similar sort of tools exist in the music production realm also, specifically the music theory stuff which can generate all sorts of compositions.

      The only people it hurts are the people that bastardized the craft from the get-go. making it a job where an artist can enjoy the fruits of their labor instantly is fricked. It never was like this with art before, why they make it all gay and complicated, who knows? Their warped perspective on the craft may be doomed, but the craft will still be around regardless.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The "craft" doesn't matter. The process doesn't matter either. What matters is the product and sometimes the story behind its making. The only reason people are not completely replaced is because creativity is not something a computer can have and the subjective value of the name of the person who made the piece

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >creativity is not something a computer can have
          Moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There is a big market on twitter and a couple other platforms where artists take commissions for shit like
      >draw anime girl X bent over legs spread farting with huge nipples visible
      >draw furry dog diaper fetish scene
      and an AI bot can do all of these things. All of the horny welfare NEETs feeding these artists cash can now generate infinite new degenerate monstrosities for themselves in a couple minutes. The "artists" who are most threatened and complaining are just porn producers

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Of course it affects people. It's like the change from 2d to 3d in games, or automated farming. It completely changes the game.

      All value (money) is created from scarcity. AI floods the market. They are farmers unwilling to change the way they farm, as farmers with tractors and new fertilizers are outcompeting them.

      The sensible thing would be to adapt their work. Learn how to use AI. Then use their skills to touch things up. A smart farmer would learn how a tractor works, because their other skills and experience should put them ahead of just a guy with a tractor and no farming experience.

      But who gets hit the first? The most worthless of artists. It's not like those who've monetised them drawing on their tablet or painting for livestreams will cease getting money. Newspapers are technically obsolete and so is radio, but things always have their own appeal. Human made art will always exist and have some value. It's just that morons that had some value due to having some art skill can't even beat someone who uses AI.

      There will be artists in the coming years who rely 100% on using AI to serve clients.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It looks like most of their woes are self-inflicted from the thought of AI taking over art.
      Dingdingding. These are mentally ill morons that don't understand that AI can't be copyrighted, so corporate artists' jobs are gonna be safe, since corps demand a stranglehold on their IP. There is literally no practical use in a corporate setting for AI art that isn't also tedious and boring work that artists hate working on too, things like editing stock photos or clipart. Oh no, the graphic design intern might have to spend their time doing something more useful, what a horrible thing for everybody!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        corporations as we know them are no longer going to exist. They're all based on profiting off providing goods and services that nobody is going to be able to afford anymore.

        They're all propped up by the labour of human beings which is going to be replaced by AI. But the labour itself isn't going to be necessary anymore. There's no point in coke continuing to manufucture their bottles and cans of syrup if no one is going to buy them anymore. Or, at least, there will be much less people able to buy them, so , there'll be no point in manufacturing their products at the current scale.

        Every single good and service you can think of is going to be exclusively for the elite because they will be the only consumers.

        As for the rest of us, look at , I don't know, africa, syria, india, brazil, places like that. Thats our future standard of living.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Or China - look at China and all those labour slaves. Frick you think you're a wave slage now? Oh sweetie.

          And thats if you get a job at all. Look to china if you want an idea of what the workforce is going to look like from now on.

          You know how jeff bezos brutally exploits factory workers in china? There is no magical reason why he would never do that to factory workers here as long as he can get away with it. And now he and everybody like him will be able to get away with it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It looks like most of their woes are self-inflicted from the thought of AI taking over art
      You cracked the code. That's what it is, basically. (Stock photo photographers are in danger, however)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Smut, anon.
      These "artists" are no longer needed for people to recreate their wicked fetishes.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ye
    Great art is borne through pain and necessity, and modern painters have grown bloated through nfts and patreons teat

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm guessing pic unrelated?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Most related pic possible
        Van Gogh sliced his own ear off and never achieved recognition until after death

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Despite what the locals may think, there is nothing intrinsically illogical or impossible about having a genuine, functioning Utopia, or removing badness without removing goodness, or pain without pleasure, or suffering without excitement…

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Troons were always going to kill themselves though

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well I didn't, but now you've kind of talked me into it

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He should just get a real job and do art as a hobby. Its what most people do. The follow your passion stuff is just a meme. People want to be an artist because it is a skill a child can do and its something were there isn't someone telling you how you ought to be doing it. That's why they are passionate they want self autonomy. The thing is, if they just tried other things and did some personal exploration they would find other things that they could enjoy and be passionate about. Things that could actually pay money. AI art can be depressing because what it says of art philosophically, but banning it doesn't really change that. I think AI art is a good counter balance to modern art because it will force art to think about ascetic again rather than what strange and vague message a piece can send. I have felt artist haven't had anything interesting to say for as long as I have been alive and adopting a more classical don't put too much of yourself into the work approach would be a breath of fresh air. They should honestly develop themselves more as people before they try to push a message because they think it will make their art better.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yup
      “Art” is a dying form. It will always exist but it mostly does today under other names. Memes are art. A lot of things are actually art but are not named such. While named art is shit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Memes are art by the common people for the common people. They express emotion and related feeling so way they have become a standard form of communication. Honestly if artist weren't such elitist they would recognize memes as art that achieved the modern art ideal of being less conventionally ascetic and more about what they mean.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Where are the sudoku livestreams though

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >A livestream of my suicide would be the only art form AI can't fake
    Actually I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to faceswap you onto Ronnie, inkcel.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"I don't really want to offend you, but I kinda want just really rendered pieces in here. Like stuff at an AI Art level".
    Kek, I assure you 100% all of these are troll posts.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    come and take it

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Digital art might be dead but who cares about that

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I feel like a failure
    Get in line buddy, everybody feels like a failure these days

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >VaushV
    Yes i gladly support these creatures removing themselves from the gene pool. They cheered for globohomosexual now they are served globohomo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So much this
      They think and feel like globohomosexual art cutout models

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    get an actual job paintpigs

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is natural selection under the exact same logic.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    These artists wouldn't ever draw what I want, so... yes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what vile disgusting fetish got rejected?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        a white woman making breakfast to her white husband and white 4 children. everyone is happy and thinking that there will be a good future.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          that exists, just not for you

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          ok buddy... 35 year old south asian mal order bride making instant oatmeal before her nursing job, with 2 homosexual hapa boys watching tiktok on their phones, best I can do~

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            LMFAO

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Mum caught me watching Good Old Fashioned Christmas last week and I can't look her in the eye still.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i never understood the hate christmas movies get. as cheesy as they may be, at least they have a soul

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >at least they have a soul
              You know exactly why anon

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how many of those are brand new troll accounts made on reddit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >reddit c**ts make "woe is me, so depressed, much sadness" self-pity drama posts
      >unbelievable
      LMAO, get fricked

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        its either farming karma to sell the account to chinks or BOT/kiwifarms being edgy again with raids by making troll accounts on reddit, posting crap, and then posting screenshots here or on discord.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          or and insufferable reddit-gay like you who should stay there 😉

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            or and vice jit

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Christ, just draw for fun you gays

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Zoomers are incapable of doing anything without social media validation and attention whoring.
      Why draw if they can't get likes for it?

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How many of those posts are ai generated

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      a lot of them. chatgpt can make a ton of troll responses better than /misc/ and other boards.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      entire thread is, and had been for about a month now

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >a livestream of my suicide would be the only art form AI can't fake

    1. Yes it can
    2. Nothing of value was lost

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The last one is touching
    I’d talk to that kid
    The other ones can go like turds in a sewer on a rainy day

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art will at make it impossible to live off drawing for coomers.

    You WILL go back to writing SQL for big tech.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > You WILL go back to writing SQL for big tech.
      AI will take that from them too, soon enough.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Bye bye turd

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Same homosexuals that would have complained about the steam engine and electricity, things they wouldn't live without

    Pretty much ignore these homosexuals

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you're about to be living without eletricity. Where do you think the eletricity to power all the AI is going to come from. There's not enough of it to go around

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You're about to be living without electricity because you're about to be put out of a job. Putting artists out of a job is just the first step.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeh I know. Whats your point.
          my point was also that we're not actually going to have electricity even available as a resource we can pay for.
          We don't even really need it anyway. Its a luxury.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Which AI can make gay furry porn for me based on 2 characters I provide (not describing them in prompts) in 2023? None. The artists I'm paying are safe (for now).

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    if you are an artist that can be replaced by ai that can only mean you are not a very good one, zero empathy for those frickers

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Fake libertard "art" is a waste of resources. They even can't use any cool drugs like LSD anymore, LSD is more common in STEM than art. Art is not a major, it's a hobby. By automating art, we weed out 90% of the scene of blm bleeding heart "artists" and the people who have no taste and want machine stamped kitsch. The AI will get better over time, and the remaining 10% can continue producing true art for those with taste and the wallet to afford real art.

    Hell, with the current state of Hollywood, AI can write far better scripts than hollywood "screenwriters" do

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Hell, with the current state of Hollywood, AI can write far better scripts than hollywood "screenwriters" do
      For mass-produced capeshit-tier shlock it has real potency in churning out flicks, maybe even whole animated movies. Hollywood israelites seems like too much of a syndicate to be taken down but they may start relying on it someday.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    luddites deserve the rope

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/xkK57Vt.png

      Where can I find a large public gathering of AI bros?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        r/DefendingAIArt

        Yes I know it's Reddit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/
        https://www.reddit.com/r/LoveForAIArt/

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          Where can I find a large public gathering of AI bros?

          just in case you wanted a preview

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >muh russia

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >muh russia

            DO YOU moronS KNOW WHAT SATIRE IS

            LOVEFORAIART IS S A T I R E

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              why would a BOT chuds know about "le ironic" reddit circle-jerks, you played yer-selves

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >chad handshaking with an awesome robot dude in future utopia
              >bad

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              how am i supposed to know that, i dont use reddit

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                (he's a redditor troon who thinks everyone on BOT is also one too)

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Those are online gatherings.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            of the alt-right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why is it always violence with these peaceful, tolerant people?

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/7qXxseV.png

      >they're giving chuds AI
      isn't that kind of stupid?

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      hope he does

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >dislike AI art
    >love all the butthurt from "artists" who obviously wouldn't be complaining if they were successful
    i don't know which side to take

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >A Livestream of my suicide is the only artform an AI can't fake
    Dam he's right, the dataset is too small.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They'll do it anyway when they can't get a job in the art market as its been over saturated for DECADES already.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    frick AI
    i dont know why people dont wake up because A.I is bad
    conspiracy become real truth

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You can still spot the difference, unfortunately most people don't have a good eye and aren't able to.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Favourite artist drew ntr, so yes i support AI.
    Death to artists but most of all, DEATH to japan

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >paiting to live
    Bruh, since the advent of photography and computer-aided illustration, art is for relaxation, not money.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This.
      I dont really care if ai art takes over since it isn't going to stop me being creative and drawing. If anything it will be a fun tool to use like photoshop is today.
      >although we likely won't see any opensource ai projects for awhile.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This will happen to BOT when AI starts replacing code monkeys

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art can easily be spotted by the naked eye. Once it gets really good such that we can't spot it is when artists truly will get replaced by it. So far it doesn't compete with really good art, it all looks the same.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      most modern art is low-effort "expressionism" garbage.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't all these digital artists kill themselves over all the art supplies companies they fricked over by using Wacom and Photoshop? Or is that different somehow, because it benefited them?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "It's okay if it's a corporation"

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that this person doesn't feel that way about AI art, they feel that way about the exaggerated nonsense people tell them about AI art

    stop letting other people tell you what to feel idiot

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't you take it to the creators instead of plebs who don't invent these things?

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    People malding about AI are too stupid to realize that it's just another tool to expand their creative workflow, which tells me they weren't that much creative in the first place.
    This shit makes three.js scenes for me, these morons don't understand the fun I'm having.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      have fun with your double edge sword while it lasts.

      Makes learning something easier and faster while at the same time, rendering learning that something pointless.

      Makes doing certain work more efficient and speedline while at the same time ensuring that work will no longer exist in the near future.

      I envy your motivation. Mine has been deflated

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I just need to understand the problem I want to solve and achieve desired results through trial and error. What you're learning here is a new language.
        Art is going to be a conversation.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ensuring that work will no longer exist in the near future.
        Why do you want to prolong work that is a wasted effort in comparison to something more efficient? It seems like a complacent and greedy opinion to have.
        Buying shit with money which, at the bottom of the supply chain, likely began as critical resources?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          we're all going to be unemployed, is my point.

          Yeh the tasks are done more efficiently, but thats not going to be of any benefit to you or me my friend.

          That leaves you and me of no use to the economy. That leaves society as we know it unnecessary, passe, phased out.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No it doesn't. It makes the work more abstracted. There will be actuaries and technicians for what was previously a field dominated by artists and theorists, then the artists and theorists will move onto another project.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >It makes the work more abstracted.
              yeh. And people won't be doing it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stick to digging ditches.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That job is going away too, sadly. See water cremations.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >There will be actuaries and technicians for what was previously a field dominated by artists and theorists, then the artists and theorists will move onto another project.
              No, if you want to know what artists and art is going to look like, check out what it looks like in dirt poor third world places.

              They needn't worry about AI replacing them and their tools and craft. Its actually going right back to basics. Maybe even as primitive as finger painting on cave walls.

              I think people will be distracted by more pressing concerns though, like, basic survival in a brutal third world dystopia and probable war zone.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    good riddance

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Trannies kill themselves
    On other news, water is wet

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Artists killing themselves over machine learning art instead of killing themselves over REAL SHIT like having to interact with the DirectX 12 API. SMDH.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Holding themselves hostage won't do anything, I don't negotiate with terrorists.

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >a livestream of my suicide would be the only art form AI can't fake
    wanna bet?

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >get your magic ticket taken away
    >have to slum it with the rest of us for five minutes
    >realize it's hell
    >rope
    No sympathy.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So we should stop the progress of technology that could help people because a few artists don't like it? If we stopped doing something everything someone killed themself over it, nothing would get done.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >r/vaushv
    he can go die for all i care.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Corporations... le bad
    >From the same Black folk that defended Disney and Blizzard like it were fatherland whenever they made gay shit
    Ironic...

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. In fact, I welcome AI overlords to enslave me. Humanity is not worth saving.

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >twitter.com/reddit_lies/status/1610669909842825222
    Depth down, even leftie know their arts are trash for years and AI can do much better in matter of seconds. By guilt tripping people they think they can somehow win this battle. Censorship is their ultimate card after all.

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The asshurt from Artists is amazing.

    The fact of the matter is disruptions will always happen. Art also has NEVER BEEN IMMUNE TO AUTOMATION. Case in point there used to be artists who did nothing but a portraits, and it was a skill. They pretty much went the way of the dodo bird when photography came into play. Sure artists still paint portraits for people who desire them but that's a neich demand and not the conventional means of getting an accurate means of a person.
    There are so many examples, automobiles taking over the horse and carriage industry, phone switchboard operators, Lamplighters replaced by electric lights, quartz watches replacing what was once a very skilled craft. The list goes on.
    No in defense of arts not all these disruptions were good? I mean there was a time for example milk men were a thing before refrigeration was consumer friendly, a people say the milk was better back then. But the demand just isn't there and thus thst went away too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The fear in them that they might actually have to get a fricking job is priceless

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >a people say the milk was better back then
      Bet they liked being cucked by the milkman kek

      >twitter.com/reddit_lies/status/1610669909842825222
      Depth down, even leftie know their arts are trash for years and AI can do much better in matter of seconds. By guilt tripping people they think they can somehow win this battle. Censorship is their ultimate card after all.

      >even leftie know their arts are trash for years and AI can do much better in matter of seconds
      And we have winner. Seriously, look at all those """"protests""" on twitter of """real artists""" against AI art, their shit was "tumblr fanart"-tier at best and "literally Paint drawing from devianart"-tier at worst, yet they/them thought that gallery of crap was some sort of checkmate while the computer can churn out a baroque painting in seconds

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Taking away the milk man hurt the ecosystem.
      >there was a bird that became adapted to milk men bottles, having longer beaks that previous generations. Just so they could rip open the foil coving the bottle and could eat the milk solid on the top.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI is different than any other tech we had, everything you said created new areas that demanded more people, but the way AI works and learns, it can catch up to any new task that a human could possibly do. There’s no point beyond AI, we’re building our obsolescence.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >we’re building our obsolescence
        >defining yourself as a wagiecuck and nothing more
        ngmi

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The biggest issue with AI seems to be how it could create wealth transfers from poor class to rich.. AI might make it less costly for companies like Disney to hire graphic artists and web developers when they can just pay a data analyst less to feed prompts to an AI engine.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI might make it less costly for companies like Disney to hire graphic artists and web developers when they can just pay a data analyst less to feed prompts to an AI engine
      Yet these loony troons won't shittalk disney or any other company but blame the "tech bros"

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is the part I find most amusing about this shitfest. They could have spun this debate into something all sides can agree on, hating giant corporations. But as usual, the twitter mob is full of troony morons that once again target everyday people just having fun, like the good little corporate minions they are.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the twitter mob is full of troony morons that once again target everyday people just having fun, like the good little corporate minions they are
          Exhibit A: The app made by Tencent and the absolute silence these gays went through (except when they cried about muh diversity in a fricking anime db). Guess giving their data to the ccp is not a bad thing for these morons.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what a woman

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Anon no! It's a chilean actress!

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    skill issue.

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ehhhh, frick the artists
    Most of the really good ones have all fricked off on Patreon, and what's remaining are extremely stingy on commission, they won't do this, they won't do that and they won't do commissions that's too specific
    Frick that
    With shitty RPG Maker games, we had artists that made a game but can't program. The other way around is not quite as common. With this technology, in the future, we can have the other way around

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >be "artist"
    >love the attention, money.
    >the creativity is whatever, i don't care.
    >people pay me to draw homosexual furry wieners cumming over Belgian medieval villages for some reason.
    >a computer program gets created
    >it can create dripping Belgian medieval villages
    >it can create photorealistic glistening animal wieners
    >people flock to it instead of paying me and begging me to complete their art
    >my meager source of non-government-handout money is gone
    >my meager source of attention-whoring is gone
    >nobody begs me to finish shading their fursona's ballsack anymore
    >time to kill myself

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >cumming over Belgian medieval villages for some reason
      Please be a random string of words you just pulled out of your ass...

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ye
    they most likely draw my favourite character as a Black person anyway

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is like the wave of Elsa Spiderman gore videos that ended up on YouTube Kids, fricking hilarious
    >now filters bad art
    Yeah, they can all move onto globohomosexual animation and duke it out there for 1-season forgettable cartoons now

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Students are literally killing themselves and I still support schools.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's because you're a bluepilled boomer who has never spent time thinking over pedagogy. Technology is the desirable death of Prussian model schooling.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If your country's school system sucks donkey dicks then that's a shame, but I still support schools.

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes infact i invested in an AI company

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Their favorite gay space communism TV show had AI generated art.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why the frick Whoopi is in the group shot as if she were a main character?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        she was that important in lore and irl back then, Roddenberry was wokey leftist af

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Next time just become a plumber and do art on the side, as it was always meant to be.
    Art was always a cutthroat industry because there are so few jobs and so many people that want to do this, but it was fine because a few big fish could profit. Now part of these big fishes (and new artists that are clueless about the industry) feel threatened so they whine a lot.
    A job is doing something someone else wants for money. Nobody wants your art. It's not a job, it's a hobby.

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Computer, generate an inari fox shrine in medieval Japan. Now fill it with 42 kitsune girls. Have them all be in heat with servile personalities. Disengage safety protocols.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Future is going to be amazing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Disengage safety protocols.
      I'm laughing at this way too hard, thanks anon, made my day.

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    only shit artists seethe at AI art

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Paint pigs aren't real people.

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    cry more inkcel you will own nothing and be happy

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >A livestream of my suicide would be the only art form AI can't fake
    yet

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Weak mental
    Hearing about the AI Art fuss just made me more interested in art in general, and actually learn it.
    Sure you could generate your idea, or you could draw it with your own skill.
    Nothing wrong with AI tho.

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yawn~
    call me when one of them actually do
    it's just pathetic attention whoring

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ok but will it replace programmers too? Unironically kinda regretting choosing cs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      eventually, yes

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cool. Yes I support it. I wanted these homosexuals dead a long time ago.

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good job BOTcucks this is going to be future for art in the near future.
    AI protection Art curation of the future,
    >NDAs required to filled, signed and notarized before viewing.
    >Phones camera and all electronic devices are prohibited. Phones and cameras locked will be inspected.
    >Sketching or using anything to gain a reference is strictly prohibited.
    >Artwork will be placed in a hermetically sealed room in vacuum that also acts as as Faraday cage. Viewing will be possible from windows that can be shuttered.
    >Viewing times will be limited and recorded vai facial recognition and eye tracking to 2minutes. Attempting to view art after this time will result in the shutters closing before you can see the art.
    >Speaking of the names of work or describing them will be prohibited.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not my problem

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Don't forget you have to mentally "purge" your memory of the art you just saw unless you play for those "memory enjoyment" royalties.

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is just music to my ears
    Most of those " artist" are nothing but liberal fans who lives from drawing cartoon characters from show and get other ppl horny over them.

    Now they are replaced you want a cute animal waifu ? Well I just type the prompt and get it in less waiting time and for fking free.

    Get replaced gaygs

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    90% of these people are zoomers who bought into the whole "turn your hobby into a job" meme, or the grindset mentality, or whatever it's called.

    the outrage is that robots are eliminating their ability to be able to do their hobby as their job, not that the robots are replacing THEM, per se

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is nothing but a prediction of the future, I really don’t get why everyone discuss it in a so detached way.

    It’s not that I care about artists, but because there’s not a reason the same won’t happen with most of us.

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't the all the great masters of art since antiquity have a gaggle of students that did grunt work according to instructions given by their master?
    Are these furry artists trying to tell me Proserpina's plump, delicious body isn't real art?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Didn't the all the great masters of art since antiquity have a gaggle of students that did grunt work according to instructions given by their master?
      Yes, a "Masterpiece" was something an apprentice made that was a good enough copy of the master he'd put his name to it.
      >Are these furry artists trying to tell me Proserpina's plump, delicious body isn't real art?
      Probably.
      Modern art education tell you individuality is far more important than "slavish imitation."

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    real artists are fine, coomer twitter gays are kinda finished:

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    well don’t you think tech wagies should be more concerned about this than art gays?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, we're already rich

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      all the shit ones got replaced by pajeets a long time ago, no worries
      there is no equivalent of twitter troons slinging 20$ YCH, at least not in North America

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What makes the artists seething sad and pathetic is, no code monkey thinks on his job as his defining identity and derive all his worth from it, it's just a job when it comes down to it.
      Nobody ever asks of ai code, "but does it have soul?" only that it works.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        shit tier bait, obviously art has been something people do for fun since humanity fricking started. artists just try to turn it into their job so they can do what they truly like and not just wageslave for a big company

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I bought a $40 tablet and tried to draw hentai but it was awful so yeah I'll stick to ai

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Stick to it, you still have to fix all those hands and occasional frickups.
      More Graphic Designers use those tablets for photo-shopping than drawgays.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *