get back to work OP, I promised my kid a happy meal and those burgers ain't flipping themselves.
beep boop i am a robot
The machines in the matrix aren't real AI, that's the entire point of the movie. Despite how advanced they are they can't understand humans, because humans are a divine/higher existence than them.
You should worry more about the ends, friend
Why is it important to delineate between a natural human mind, and an artificial one? What are the consequences of getting that distinction wrong?
Also I've solved two Capchas in a row.
>Why is it important to delineate between a natural human mind, and an artificial one?
one example: "my" ai did something that i am now liable for
could think of endless other things first to come to mind are
finance and banking
education
journalism
The machines in the matrix aren't real AI, that's the entire point of the movie. Despite how advanced they are they can't understand humans, because humans are a divine/higher existence than them.
Question about Ai, what happens when it gets to be able to affect things directly? There are many programmers in the world. With the access we have to openai. Its already out of the box for someone...
They already have been using AI with quantum computers to control every kind of data imaginable. They are probably releasing this lobotomized AI to push the Internet of Things and totaliarian control before 2030.
Now the question is if some kind of AI already gone rogue and it's somewhere living on the Internet (cicada3301, TYLER, PROJECT MAYHEM). Probably some old ARGs are from this rogue AI.
John Searle is a moron, and so are you.
Consciousness is an emergent phenomenon. The consciousness in the Chinese room thought experiment isn't actually the "middle man" in the room, taking in the inputs, following the books' instructions, and returning the output. The consciousness is actually the information stored in the books themselves.
You should worry more about the ends, friend
Why is it important to delineate between a natural human mind, and an artificial one? What are the consequences of getting that distinction wrong?
Also I've solved two Capchas in a row.
>The consciousness is actually the information stored in the books themselves.
Yeah the books sure are aware and understanding. I think true AI is coming, but a bunch of language and image models aren't it. They just mimic it very well.
>open thread >reee prove you are human YOU CANT PROVE IT
Digital ID is coming anons. The populace will eat this shit up. How the fuck do we protect ourselves?
there's no such thing as AI, it's a meme word made up by scifi writers that has been proven to be impossible fundamentally, meaning even after 5,000 years of advanced technology the probability of AI existing will still be 0
midwit
No you. You cant even explain yourself.
prove you are human
do it now
I think therefore I am, gay
dubito, ergo sum, vel, quod idem est, cogito, ergo sum F A G G O T
You're a moron.
fuck you no proof
>Why is it important to delineate between a natural human mind, and an artificial one?
one example: "my" ai did something that i am now liable for
could think of endless other things first to come to mind are
finance and banking
education
journalism
get back to work OP, I promised my kid a happy meal and those burgers ain't flipping themselves.
beep boop i am a robot
The machines in the matrix aren't real AI, that's the entire point of the movie. Despite how advanced they are they can't understand humans, because humans are a divine/higher existence than them.
Where is this suggested?
The only thing they didn't understand is why humans didn't like the perfect versions.
Question about Ai, what happens when it gets to be able to affect things directly? There are many programmers in the world. With the access we have to openai. Its already out of the box for someone...
They already have been using AI with quantum computers to control every kind of data imaginable. They are probably releasing this lobotomized AI to push the Internet of Things and totaliarian control before 2030.
Now the question is if some kind of AI already gone rogue and it's somewhere living on the Internet (cicada3301, TYLER, PROJECT MAYHEM). Probably some old ARGs are from this rogue AI.
Chinese room end of story.
John Searle is a moron, and so are you.
Consciousness is an emergent phenomenon. The consciousness in the Chinese room thought experiment isn't actually the "middle man" in the room, taking in the inputs, following the books' instructions, and returning the output. The consciousness is actually the information stored in the books themselves.
prove you are human
we demand it
You should worry more about the ends, friend
Why is it important to delineate between a natural human mind, and an artificial one? What are the consequences of getting that distinction wrong?
Also I've solved two Capchas in a row.
>The consciousness is actually the information stored in the books themselves.
Yeah the books sure are aware and understanding. I think true AI is coming, but a bunch of language and image models aren't it. They just mimic it very well.
How AI can be real if we can't see the code?
eliza was "real enough" already
>open thread
>reee prove you are human YOU CANT PROVE IT
Digital ID is coming anons. The populace will eat this shit up. How the fuck do we protect ourselves?
what if i give my personal assistant access to my digital id?
NO PROOF
i'd have a harder time convincing you animals are sentient than your graphics card
there's no such thing as AI, it's a meme word made up by scifi writers that has been proven to be impossible fundamentally, meaning even after 5,000 years of advanced technology the probability of AI existing will still be 0
image generated by a malicious ai
>777
not feeling lucky
ai promised me free candy and bitcoin if i scan it so i did and so can you