>read the first page of this. >realize AI could never ever not in a million years write it

>read the first page of this
>realize AI could never ever not in a million years write it
We're safe human bros

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would also be impressed if they wrote the world's shittiest book.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      That would be Catcher in the Rye.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Salinger would be delighted to know he's still making psueds seethe to this day.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Salinger *is* the pseuds, anon. He's peak midwit, as evidenced by his fanbase.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >psueds
          Kek, nice touch. Trolling truly is a art.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            it's not trolling BOTards unironically talk like that and think they're in the right

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    this is one the most boring books I've read, so it looks like a win for the AI

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I would also be impressed if they wrote the world's shittiest book.

      I drive uber and two kids sat in my car yesterday using autogpt to write a biology paper, discussing it the whole way
      education and research is dead

      >I read it in school therefore it's bad
      npc thinking

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        What does your comment have to do with

        I drive uber and two kids sat in my car yesterday using autogpt to write a biology paper, discussing it the whole way
        education and research is dead

        ?
        Fucking idiot.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        How does that make it not garbage?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >anything usedin school is instantly high quality
        standardized testing would like to join the conversation

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm an esl so I didn't read it in school

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I too have shit taste and have generally observed this to hold true.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nevermind. I

        I too have shit taste and have generally observed this to hold true.

        missed that you said, 'school'.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong
        >its bad because i watched a utoob video about why it bad

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    howd your book report come out? you know ms smith wants us to finish it by tomorrow by third period.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I drive uber and two kids sat in my car yesterday using autogpt to write a biology paper, discussing it the whole way
    education and research is dead

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Where were you driving them to?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      i teach at a university (not a professor), and students do not have to write a paper ever again. even if they do, there is minimal work that is needed to take something that chatgpt starts and expanding some of the evidence/analysis
      anything in the humanities and soft sciences are dead except at the highest level. college degrees are going to be worth even less

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Until they don't check what chatgpt shits out and make huge errors they don't pick up because they don't understand.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I drive Uber
      Good morning smelly brownsir

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >And, after boasting this way of my tolerance, I come to the admission that it has a limit. Conduct may be founded on the hard rock or the wet marshes, but after a certain point I don’t care what it’s founded on. When I came back from the East last autumn I felt that I wanted the world to be in uniform and at a sort of moral attention forever; I wanted no more riotous excursions with privileged glimpses into the human heart. Only Gatsby, the man who gives his name to this book, was exempt from my reaction—Gatsby, who represented everything for which I have an unaffected scorn. If personality is an unbroken series of successful gestures, then there was something gorgeous about him, some heightened sensitivity to the promises of life, as if he were related to one of those intricate machines that register earthquakes ten thousand miles away. This responsiveness had nothing to do with that flabby impressionability which is dignified under the name of the “creative temperament”—it was an extraordinary gift for hope, a romantic readiness such as I have never found in any other person and which it is not likely I shall ever find again. No—Gatsby turned out all right at the end; it is what preyed on Gatsby, what foul dust floated in the wake of his dreams that temporarily closed out my interest in the abortive sorrows and short-winded elations of men.
    If this doesn't make you feel anything you have no soul

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tech people are largely illiterate and aesthetically retarded, so it's no surprise to me that most of BOT has no appreciation for beautiful prose.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      if the measure of a man is if he is moved by Fitzgerald's garbage then chop off my dick and call me Sally

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        who brought gender into the question
        you're right, but the better joke is
        >if the measure of a soul is if it is moved by fitzgerald, kick me down the stairs and call me a redhead

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      You are not safe.

      And, after bragging this way of my friendship, I come to the confession that it has a limit. Behavior may be based on the solid stone or the squishy mud, but after a certain point I don’t care what it’s based on. When I came back from Canterlot last fall I felt that I wanted Equestria to be in harmony and at a sort of magical balance forever; I wanted no more wild adventures with special glimpses into the pony heart. Only Glimmer, the mare who gives her name to this book, was exempt from my reaction—Glimmer, who represented everything for which I have an honest disdain. If personality is an unbroken series of successful spells, then there was something dazzling about her, some heightened sensitivity to the promises of life, as if she were related to one of those complex machines that detect tremors ten thousand hooves away. This responsiveness had nothing to do with that floppy gullibility which is honored under the name of the “creative spirit”—it was an extraordinary gift for hope, a romantic readiness such as I have never found in any other pony and which it is not likely I shall ever find again. No—Glimmer turned out all right at the end; it is what preyed on Glimmer, what nasty dust floated in the wake of her dreams that temporarily closed out my interest in the failed sorrows and short-breathed joys of ponies.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        what I like about this board is that blatant shit like this comes up and nobody gives a fuck and the jannies don't ever bother

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        unironically better prose than fitzgerald

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      kino

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      i cry evertim

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI can't even do 1+1, I wouldn't expect to be able to do anything else correctly.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Modern writers are trash though. AI isn't competing against Scott Fitzgerald it's competing against some nepo baby garbage. McCarthy was the last of the great western writers.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Modern writers mostly rehash shit. Books are only a good medium because traditionally they were the only way great works of story telling got passed on.

      Nowadays anyone can read and write a shitty story so they are diluted with shit

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    A robot cannot fake the level of pretentiousness in this book only a human could do this. Same with that gay book catcher and the rye.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >this is the book that represents english literature

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      American literature anon.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. I bought this book with intention to read some English literature. But then I realized it's American. But it's nothing compared to the fact I don't know English

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >blocks your path
      Southern Gothic is nothing but kinos.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      this book is boring af. Been reading all my life and it deserves none of the praise and fame. It drags on and on without saying anything substantial. It's masturbatory.

      american.

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    > ITT: retards that have never touched a book after school

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    You are dumb. The on-rails, overly bland AI is just the one you have access to. The elites are using the real AGI already.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *