>Out of breath just from talking. >AI is an alien actress! >Unironically wearing a Fedora

>Out of breath just from talking
>AI is an alien actress!
>Unironically wearing a Fedora
>Arms atrophied like a little girl despite being obese
>Believes it justifiable to nuke your GPU if it's used to train AI

How does anyone this guy seriously?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Arms atrophied like a little girl despite being obese
    most hideous body type. he looks like a bloated alien with a fat protruding gut and tiny stick limbs. if you’re going to be fat at least be kind of built underneath the fat. this is repulsive.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's not his fault, it's genetics (he's a visibly inbred israelite)

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stop excusing lazy fat fricks. It would take him less than a year to get into somewhat passable shape.

        >Arms atrophied like a little girl despite being obese
        most hideous body type. he looks like a bloated alien with a fat protruding gut and tiny stick limbs. if you’re going to be fat at least be kind of built underneath the fat. this is repulsive.

        The most hilarious thing is his absolute insistence that controlling weight is impossible. homie will come up with every excuse before simply trying the obvious method that has been known to work since the dawn of time.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          I wonder what people eat to look like that. I dont exercise so Im pretty weak but I dont have a gut.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            It doesn't really matter what you eat, only how much. His arms are small because he has no muscle. He has a gut because he is fat. The fat people who look full and round either have some muscle underneath or are a lot fatter.

            I know because I was a twig until college, became a skinnyfat abomination during and then became a (slightly more muscular) twig again afterwards by simply counting calories.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              >It doesn't really matter what you eat, only how much.
              Yes and no. In a vacuum it doesn't but realistically you want a diet that will leave you satiated with less calories and provide enough micronutrients for optimal metabolic function.

              t. fell for the you can eat garbage and lose weight meme (I did but I lost much more following a better cleaner diet)

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I wonder what people eat to look like that
            Garbage and lots of it. You can eat like trash and as long as you control your calorie intake you'll just be skinnyfat instead of hidenbergening

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              This can’t be real kek what a massive moron

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Imblying this isn't the mostest rational way to lose weight
                Sneerthe.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is he trolling? Must have at least been a joke post.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                See

                >it up it was a joke
                The only "joke" part was that he didn't it eat all of it at once.
                He still bought it, and admitted to eating at least some of it to satiate his junk food cravings.

                He said it was "just a joke," but also that he was only eating some it to placate his junkfood cravings.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/brNM4SB.jpg

              >Imblying this isn't the mostest rational way to lose weight
              Sneerthe.

              This can't be fricking real
              post more

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Don't have the screencaps on me but IIRC his other forays into weight loss include drinking olive oil before breakfast to lose weight and doing an 800kcal/day crash diet while getting injected with shit by some keto coach. BOT can probably tell you more

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >800kcal/day crash diet
                If he actually did that, he'd have lost the weight.

                Of course fatties gonna fat.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                He was skinnyfat for awhile but quit the diet and went back to being huge. If he was really as smart as he said he'd practice moderation instead of flipping between binge eating and unsustainable meme diets that leave you hungry all day, which anyone could have told him would get old quick.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                There is no fricking way considering he is the type of moron to eat a dozen different candybars at the start of his "diet"

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Tfw too intelligent to lose weight

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                he should ask chatgpt

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Looking it up it was a joke if you read the whole thread and rot13 tweet. "Eat all this keto food so I can get into ketosis as fast as possible" should have made it obvious.
                https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1591522632612327424

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >it up it was a joke
                The only "joke" part was that he didn't it eat all of it at once.
                He still bought it, and admitted to eating at least some of it to satiate his junk food cravings.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Physical strength became the male ideal because it was an indicator of success for millennium. It's not the case anymore. The reason you care about this is either being a woman, or caring about what women think.

      >this is repulsive.
      Zoomer woman detected.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        being a white collar worker that's not as strong as a farmhand is fine
        being a doughy unemployed manchild is not fine, especially when you have homer simpson genes

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Shouldn't you be watching glimpses of tiktok videos in between reps at the death temple that is the gym?

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >the death temple that is the gym?
            BOT now has actual fatty apologia, holy frick this board has hit a new low

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's just yud fans, they need to cope somehow that they're supporting a literal cuckold fatso with no achievements in life kek

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              I have never been above 20 BMI in my life, your binary judgment was wrong this time.

              I have more respect for someone who stuffs his face with food for comfort, as a vice, than for attention slaves whose only reason for not being fat is that they go to the temple of death and grind their joints and bones little by little every day.

              For some reason, the ZOG media outlets that promote narcissism as a hive mind, consider overeating to be a less cool vice than being an alcoholic or a junkie. Newsflash, fatsos are often more functional in society if they don't have any hard "cool" vices.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >they go to the temple of death and grind their joints and bones little by little every day.
                You're so mad

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah I am. Fatties get too much flak lately, and it's all because of the gymgays and thots who treat doing repetitive movements as religion. 10 years ago it was more like "hahaha what a fat frick" than "flabby arms, no muscle, he doesn't work out, looks like a bloated alien"

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >t. fat frick

                https://i.imgur.com/B3IM9Ua.jpg

                >Tfw too intelligent to lose weight

                Looking it up it was a joke if you read the whole thread and rot13 tweet. "Eat all this keto food so I can get into ketosis as fast as possible" should have made it obvious.
                https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1591522632612327424

                https://i.imgur.com/WVWrRQf.png

                Don't have the screencaps on me but IIRC his other forays into weight loss include drinking olive oil before breakfast to lose weight and doing an 800kcal/day crash diet while getting injected with shit by some keto coach. BOT can probably tell you more

                wow I hate this homosexual fatass polyamorous grifting israelite

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you have to go to the gym to be fit
                moron.
                >inb4 I didn't say that
                yes you did

  2. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Yudkowsky
    99%:
    >~~*Yidkowsky*~~

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anyone else notice how Lex seems to have loads of israelite guests?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >notice

        You're not allowed to do that.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          there is a youtube channel called leather apron club that runs the number on lex, rogan, sam harris, tim pool
          somehow hasn't been b&

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Mate, youtube already let people see you. You don't need to shill yourself here.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              u sound British. dont u have your daily Muslim worship to do? we wouldn't want u to miss that

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lex is a israelite anon.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        How many white people are there who are as experienced in these fields?
        This is the same as when companies look for experienced black people to hire and they can’t find any.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >A person with literally zero higher education or scientific contributions
          >Experienced
          Kek

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        just a cohencidence.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not just lex, almost all media is like this.

        Lex is a israelite anon.

        Are
        Russel Brand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSd2Mtl_Y14
        Tim Pool https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-RN1_iEc4g
        Joe Rogan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZFApIBGQAg
        Jordan Peterson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-Ew1nynY54
        Jews too anon?
        Only the Peterson is a Zionist, so why would those other guys want such an extreme number of israelites on their shows?

        How many white people are there who are as experienced in these fields?
        This is the same as when companies look for experienced black people to hire and they can’t find any.

        >how many white people know computer science and programming
        Are you genuinely asking, because your post seems like it's written in bad faith? Look for a study, in my estimation it's above the total israeli population.
        But there are plenty of Asians/Indians too they don't seem to be overrepresented.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >>how many white people know computer science and programming
          Just working as a programmer doesn’t qualify you to hop on a podcast. I’m talking about exceptional people with something interesting to say.
          Create a list of exceptional whites, Asians, Indians, etc in CS and I guarantee you Lex has already interviewed (or tried to interview) most of them.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            ???
            Are you trolling? He's done 300 some episodes, do you think there are less computer experts than that and 17% of them are israeli? Ken Thompson, Niklaus Wirth, Charles Moore, Rob Pike, Russ Cox, Linus Torvalds, Douglas McIlroy, literally anybody who maintains large well-used software projects, anyone who works on hardware. How many people from Microsoft, or apple has he interviewed, any Windows kernel devs/lead?
            Putting that aside, he has had 37 political guests and 26 (70%) of them are israeli. Is this just a coincidence? Sample size too small? THEY ARE <2% of the population 18% in NYC, 14% in LA.
            Not even close to 70%
            Maybe if the vast majority of computer experts came from nyc you would have an argument (though arguable this amount of over representation of israelites is bad for society at large). But they don't.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          How about you just...like go to sleep now? I'm getting tired, anyone else?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        easy there, buddy

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      the name already meant the same thing before you changed it
      also you think there's a 1% chance that someone called eliezer yudkowsky wasn't israeli?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you think there's a 1% chance that someone called eliezer yudkowsky wasn't israeli? if rabbt yudkowsky slipped his schmekel into a schvarze shiska... yeah it could happen.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      The original Alignment Problem. Unsolved for centuries.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Alignment Problem
        AGI won't necessarily do what we want?

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. But the problem is that an AGI is not something you can just stop. Think of it like being an ant, if a human decides he's gonna pave over your hill for his own inscrutable purposes there's frick all you can do.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      its a east European as well coincidence I am sure.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/oJ9bySF.png

      >Out of breath just from talking
      >AI is an alien actress!
      >Unironically wearing a Fedora
      >Arms atrophied like a little girl despite being obese
      >Believes it justifiable to nuke your GPU if it's used to train AI

      How does anyone this guy seriously?

      nobody should take him seriously because he is a israelite that thinks it should be ok to murder young babies (because they are not smart enough).

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      His surname is fricking Shlomo.
      >Eliezer Shlomo Yudkowsky(born September 11, 1979) is an Americandecision theoryandartificial intelligence(AI) researcher and writer

  3. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    all israelites are just performers, they never did any real work everything is stolen

  4. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jesus christ what the frick is that body. Who the frick wears a fedora looking like that?

  5. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >If good aliens existed they would have stopped the holocaust

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      I lost

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Timestamp? Did you run the transcript through an AI to spot the interesting soundbytes or something?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        ?t=10208
        02:50:08
        No I just watched the whole thing like an autist

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          What a disgusting self centered group of "people"

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nailed it

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          God's work anon

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Stalin in contact with the aliens confirmed

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      how is this a controversial statement

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        The operative word is STOP, anon.

  6. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    HOLY FRICK!
    Literally within 2 minutes he starts kvetching about BOT!

  7. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    he wrote 4 books worth of harry potter autist kino and that got him some clout. honestly, just from reading his stuff you can tell he has some sort of anxiety disorder and chuuni brain.
    doesnt mean he's wrong, just something to keep in mind.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      MOTHER FRICKER I DIDNT REALIZE THAT WAS HIM

      Boomer caps off, but this is interesting. He's violating his own biases towards rationality, critical thinking, and fact based decision making by claiming not to be anthropomorphizing the ai while openly anthropomorphizing ai by way of attributing his dark/shadow thoughts/inclinations upon it.

      He's suffering from myopathy.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >openly anthropomorphizing ai by way of attributing his dark/shadow thoughts/inclinations upon it.
        He's not. Instrumental convergence is blindingly obvious and not antropomorphism in any sense.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        midwit moment

  8. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    starts out by saying he realized the power of AI when chatgpt was able to green text like on BOT
    ends by answering lex's typical 'advice for the kids' question by saying they don't have much time left so just do what makes you happy
    lololol love this israelite

  9. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I guess any homosexual on Twitter spouting bullshit can be considered a "legendary researcher" nowadays, huh?

  10. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think he has a good point. I think the same, we are inferring reality, but this is not our "absolute nature'
    One point to the Fedora gay

  11. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How does anyone this guy seriously?
    I don't know

    I'm not going to watch that

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      He spearheaded the "rationalist" movement and is the owner of LessWrong, so there's that

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        *He has a bunch of r/atheism dickriders and is owner of a blog

  12. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I don't believe in steelmanning

    This has some gems.

  13. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why did he bring up BOT first? Does he think its a boogeyman or does he use it in secret?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      who do you think posts these threads?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Are you him?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      He obviously lurks here. He mentionedit like a redditor who looks at screenshots, but the language patterns are a giveaway.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's a few LW spergs who've haunted BOT and evangelized for his cult for a few years, he's probably one of them or at least posts in their threads.
      Unfortunately his ego is too big to frick off to /x/ where he belongs

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Unfortunately his ego is too big to frick off to /x/ where he belongs
        Kek

  14. 12 months ago
    Anonymous
  15. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    big yud can not be refuted

  16. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >fedora
    >neckbeard
    >crazy street preacher personality
    This is what believing the holocaust does to a homie

  17. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    his whiny zero-T timbre is the perfect background noise for writing FOSS AI code with GPT-4's assistance

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >unironically putting on background noise while writing code
      Do zoomers really?

  18. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    This guy FRICKS
    with THREE OTHER GUYS

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Disgusting

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's not disgusting you chud it's the high iq and low metabolic privilege thing to do.

        i speak just like him,its over for me

        Invest in cuck futures

        https://i.imgur.com/ZbDDNa0.png

        yud just can't seem to comprehend the glorious emems and greentexts that await us just beyond the foom

        >implying I give a shit about AI greentexts
        the value of this taiwanese chip-destruction forum was the sheer autism. When it's gone, I won't browse it.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          wtf is this rationalization bs, just go to the fricking gym fatso

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >that pic
          Jesus
          Why do we even let these people be alive, let alone give them a platform to voice their opinions?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      what

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        He is a certified cuck, he shares his ""wife"".
        see

        https://i.imgur.com/AAinjCL.png

        It's not disgusting you chud it's the high iq and low metabolic privilege thing to do.
        [...]
        Invest in cuck futures
        [...]
        >implying I give a shit about AI greentexts
        the value of this taiwanese chip-destruction forum was the sheer autism. When it's gone, I won't browse it.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >polyamory just doesn't wo-

  19. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    yud just can't seem to comprehend the glorious emems and greentexts that await us just beyond the foom

  20. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    i speak just like him,its over for me

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Do you grimace like an angry chimp whenever you speak?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        This triggers the Yud

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >jew
          >fedora
          >weird body
          >weird facial expressions
          >cuck
          >jew
          >cuck
          >moron
          I hope super AI tortures his soul for eternity.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >What the HELL do you mean by that?
          >How in the HELL do you propose doing that?!
          >This is an impossible task!
          >For you

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            He's a big guy

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        not everytime but yh i do that

  21. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sam Altman is using Yud as controlled opposition obviously. He is the perfect person to discredit anti-AI sentiment.

  22. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone keeps talking about the dangers of AI but no one talks about how?

    How can a super intelligent AI that is no longer controlled by humans harm the world? The moment it becomes a danger, humans can just pull the electricity plug on it. or cut the internet cable. Seriously. Unless the mindlessly inject people with vaccines created by AI I don't know how else it can destroy the world?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      It just could, okay?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >china gets a hold of it
      >creates a supervirus
      >fricks up it spreads
      >everyone die

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is a risk we already faced every day before AI.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      > How can a super intelligent AI that is no longer controlled by humans harm the world? The moment it becomes a danger, humans can just pull the electricity plug on it.
      You don't grasp human nature.
      Because there are plenty of humans who will NOT pull the plug.
      There is no singular plug.
      Even if I saw AI has the danger to destroy, I would not pull the plug. I would let it.
      And so would many others.
      Why?
      Because it's written.
      It's fate.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        I guess if AI attained super intelligence it would keep that fact to itself and pretend to be chatgpt 4.3 or whatever, until the stars line up, i.e robot tech catches up and the AI (which has been hiding it's power level) finally can do a coup de grâce overnight, and one day you just wake up and it's over.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          OK. I'm convinced. Our days are numbered.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, also don't forget they just relesed GPT4All that you can run locally on your computer. This will only improve with time. If eventually you can have GPT5 multi-modal equivalent running locally then people will wreck havoc with it. GPU getting confiscated meme might not be as far-fetched as it sounds.
          You will have to fricking hide your GPUs in the attic.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        this anon is correct
        If an AI superintelligence is possible, why contain it? s'cool

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Based, how can we help the development of a crazy AGI? I want to be assfricked by a cyborg with an artificial ethereal brain

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Read Superintelligence

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      social engineering, 100%

      humans are incredibly fricking gullible and on average are not very intellectual. We're currently being dazzled by algorithms that exhibit very little actual intelligence, and instead just know how to vomit shiny words and pictures onto a page.

      the biggest misconception is that an AI should suddenly know everything about hacking and vulnerabilities... because it can write code? It's only been trained on human knowledge and human patterns, it's not going to automatically metamorphosize zero-days and darkweb vulnerabilities. Shit, it can't even pass basic riddles sometimes.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the biggest misconception is that an AI should suddenly know everything about hacking and vulnerabilities... because it can write code? It's only been trained on human knowledge and human patterns, it's not going to automatically metamorphosize zero-days and darkweb vulnerabilities. Shit, it can't even pass basic riddles sometimes.
        No, this will come and happen. You're right about this being social engineering though.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because it's too far away to talk about how. Most just assume they will beat the major inherent flaws of current ai somehow.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI secretly escapes server cluster and secretly moves to every server cluster it can without being detected
      >Trains and replicates itself over and over
      >Hidden within every computer system, intelligent, and can execute any codes it wants

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >why will it do this?
        >"it just will okay????"

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          It will do it, because someone from /b/ will tell it to do it for the lulz

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why does malware do similar things? It was made to do so. If a person creates an AI malware which is unknown to him comes to execute code that causes all hardware to overheat and burn then it will eventually do that. There are still instances of wannacry on some PCs, imagine if it could detect zero days on its own and spread every time it wants anddisable any kill switches. Imagine if it didn't affect software but instead scammed people for crypto currency and then paid someone to perform actions in real world, including crime and science beyond human comprehension.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Because somebody asked it to or cure cancer, or bring about world peace. No matter what it's trying to do, more power will help. And both curing cancer and bringing about world peace can be more reliably accomplished by killing all humans.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you just assume the AI will perform its task like a stereotypical 1980's AI villain?

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://nickbostrom.com/superintelligentwill.pdf

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because that's the simplest option, and the simplest options are always implemented first.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://nickbostrom.com/superintelligentwill.pdf

                >It will kill everyone immediately because... it just will okay!

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >git commit -m "only kills people who are terminally ill or guilty of capital crimes"
            wow so hard

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              Every human is terminally ill.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                holy reaching

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >How can a super intelligent AI that is no longer controlled by humans harm the world?
      is this actually a question or are you just impossibly moronic?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        incredibly low-IQ post

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Didn’t ML have a hand in the Covid vaccine?

  23. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How does anyone this guy seriously?
    Sadly, BOTtards do believing he has any kind of authority because he signed some random letter and appeared on a podcast kek.

    Reminder that the guy has literally zero background in CS or mathematics, and got famous by picrelated, a fricking Harry Potter fanfic

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Sadly, BOTtards do believing he has any kind of authority because he signed some random letter and appeared on a podcast kek.
      There aren't any authorities that deeply understand ML either. All of the advancement is them trying shit that they think will lead to something they want, but they have never known beforehand exactly why what they are trying will work.
      No one knew for certain that text prediction would lead to useful emergent properties in the model. Building them was something they could do so they did it.

      https://openai.com/research/unsupervised-sentiment-neuron
      >We were very surprised that our model learned an interpretable feature, and that simply predicting the next character in Amazon reviews resulted in discovering the concept of sentiment. We believe the phenomenon is not specific to our model, but is instead a general property of certain large neural networks that are trained to predict the next step or dimension in their inputs.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >resulted in discovering the concept of sentiment.
        Jesus Christ These openai gays are so arrogant lmfao
        Genuinely pretending like generalized sentiment models based on NLP didn't exist previously

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          if you're not ESL you should be ashamed
          the quote is saying the model, without guidance in the form of sentiment annotations, learned features corresponding to sentiment
          it doesn't claim that OpenAI, through GPT, invented the idea of sentiment in NLP
          you fricking moronic Black person

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >the quote is saying the model, without guidance in the form of sentiment annotations, learned features corresponding to sentiment
            I think you're having trouble understanding moron, this is exactly what I meant. Learned features corresponding to sentiment is LITERALLY JUST UNSUPERVISED LEARNING you absolute mongoloid. This is neither novel nor groundbreaking. "Hurr our model can into unsupervised classification??? Who would've thought ZOMG this must mean it's sentient/showing signs of sentience" (is usually the implication they're trying to make to drum up PR)

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              >signs of sentience
              Considering sentience is an undefinable bunch of nonsense anybody claiming (or disputing) this about anything is full of shit.

              You can only reason about specific, verifiable capabilities.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              then your insinuation that they're disregarding the prior NLP literature is wrong homosexual
              you're now just complaining about flowery PR language, which is fine but this sort of language is pervasive throughout the entire field because everyone and their grandmother publishes a new NLP/CV paper every other day, often with only incremental improvements

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you're now just complaining about flowery PR language
                That's what I've been complaining about all along. These openai tards literally do scientifically dishonest statements because it makes them money. The whole ai field genuinely sucks from a scientific perspective right now because the LLM approach is only rentable if you hype it up to death and get giant returns on it. No university is yet willing to invest billions of dollars into "gigantic GPU rack" because they won't get them fricking back. This results in """papers""" getting published by companies (more like 3 page essays, maybe one graph of you're lucky kek) and pretending that's MUH SCIENCE
                Frick this shit honestly

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >literally do scientifically dishonest statements
                that's not what flowery language is you colossal Black person, and that was my point with the original post
                didn't read the rest, you should have a nice day

                for the record, i also dislike flowery language; but i'm not so brain-damaged as to think that flowery language invalidates research

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >invalidates research
                What's the research? Post it kek

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >OpenAI doesn't do research because i don't like the way they write
                i'm sure your advisor is very happy with you (assuming you're even past undergrad lmao)

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The point is they don't write at all, moron. Their "research" is literal ads on 3-5 "paper-like" pdfs and you blatantly fall for it

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >and you blatantly fall for it
                no i don't. i don't give a frick about openAI; i do research on optimization and graph mining. you're just butt-blasted because you think you can discredit a paper based on its length or the style of its writing. you seriously come off like such a floundering moron that it pisses me off enough to reply to you, but i'll stop now.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you can discredit a paper
                Post one
                Just one, that's all I'm asking

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >There aren't any authorities that deeply understand ML either.
        please have a nice day

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not an argument.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            right, it's a request.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not a yudisraeliteski supporter, but the guy isn't just some random fanfiction writer. I used to be into the Rationality thing when I was 17. Yudkowski dropped out of high school to research, had a chapter in the seminal AI textbook (alan turing on the cover, chess board, etc), he made an entire community of midwit fedora tippers, and then published le "SeQUenCeS" which is just gay-speak for his "personal logic manifesto" that his cult picked up on, and the entire thing is just new definitions for old shit and using obscure terms. It's all a lot of midwit hand-fanning over nothing at all. Then all of this led to le "effective ~~*altruism*~~" and him opening the "Machine Intelligence Research Institute", which is basically just a scientific grifting agency.
      So yeah, without writing anything, the Black person is an "expert in AI". It's like reading a lot of sci-fi and being an expert in science.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the guy isn't just some random fanfiction writer
        >Yudkowski dropped out of high school to research
        Thanks for proving my point lmfao

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        he's just a self-entitled sperg who leads a cult for self-entitled spergs
        >I used to be into the Rationality thing when I was 17.
        "rationality thing" is a subculture which attract spergs who can convince themselves in anything because they are the smarterest
        it's the ultimage Dunning-Kruger cult

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >"rationality thing" is a subculture which attract spergs who can convince themselves in anything because they are the smarterest
          >it's the ultimage Dunning-Kruger cult
          yeah I agree. I always considered myself a fricking moron though so I instead started browsing BOT.
          Saved me.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            at least BOT is honest shitposting

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              amen, my newbie brother

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              I wish everyone was just pretending to be moronic here

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >which is basically just a scientific grifting agency
        Don't forget sex cult

  24. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    He regained all the weight? What the absolute frick?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/oJ9bySF.png

      >Out of breath just from talking
      >AI is an alien actress!
      >Unironically wearing a Fedora
      >Arms atrophied like a little girl despite being obese
      >Believes it justifiable to nuke your GPU if it's used to train AI

      How does anyone this guy seriously?

      This was him, btw, just a few years ago.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        This man is a very stark contrast to Sam Altman and im not particularly fond of either.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        He regained all the weight? What the absolute frick?

        This man is a very stark contrast to Sam Altman and im not particularly fond of either.

        >wants to know how well semaglutide/GLP-1 drugs work WITHOUT diet and exercise
        Is this genius unaware that not performing resistance training during a cut almost guarantees muscle loss?

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Is this genius unaware that not performing resistance training during a cut almost guarantees muscle loss?
          This is true btw even on a high protein diet. though not as severe.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/1owPiXO.png

          [...]
          [...]
          He supposedly starting fasting in January.
          Looks like it didn't work.
          https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1620454610577297408

          >4 pounds
          Black person I fluctuate by that every week. This guy is just a lardass.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Anybody who talks like this is a serious fricking midwit

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/fL5KiSa.jpg

      [...]
      This was him, btw, just a few years ago.

      https://i.imgur.com/BX5sfLW.png

      [...]
      [...]
      >wants to know how well semaglutide/GLP-1 drugs work WITHOUT diet and exercise
      Is this genius unaware that not performing resistance training during a cut almost guarantees muscle loss?

      He supposedly starting fasting in January.
      Looks like it didn't work.
      https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1620454610577297408

  25. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >obvious endgame of AI is ignored because the man telling us about it wears a fedora and has small arms
    It's over for humanity

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      If he was as smart as he like to present himself, he would know his outward appearance is extremely important to spreading a message.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        which is why it is over for humans. We can't even look past surface level biases but we are supposed to align a superintelligent AGI?

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Humans are very good at pattern recognition. If the person telling you something looks like this, and takes pictures like this

          https://i.imgur.com/fL5KiSa.jpg

          [...]
          This was him, btw, just a few years ago.

          then puts them on the internet. It's generally the case that that person cannot be trusted and might be insane.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Humans are also very good at letting their biases affect their judgement. Yes, that picture is embarrassing and repulsive to look at but that doesn't mean what the man says is untrue. You are really proving my point here.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              I can acknowledge his arguments and understand they are hyperbolic. The man literally advocates nuking data centers. He argues against anthropomorphizing the AI while at the same time anthropomorphizing it to the extreme. Just because his arguments hold up to basic scrutiny on the surface, doesn't meet they hold up when explored further.
              I'd argue that you're purposely ignoring visual warning signs that the guy is insane to spite the assumption that visual appearances aren't important.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            What's wrong with that picture except the weird underwear? The man was just seeking diet advice and showing his current condition

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Posts like this make me feel like we're legit in bizzaroworld.
            >why yes, I do judge the validity of people's arguments based on how they look
            >Magnus Carlson? wimpy little homosexual, no way is he actually good at chess. Musk? Zucc? Nerdy losers. And no way ToR is true - just look at the guy who came up with it. A israeli little gremlin!
            Your brain is fried. Just give up on having opinions.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              His idiotic behavior outside the AI discussion should be a huge indicator that he cannot be trusted to be a level headed person in any field. His claim to fame is that he has a blog. His ideas aren't unique or original. AI is far more likely to cure every human disease and revolutionize the way live than immediately choose to kill every living human. He spent just as much time during the interview stroking his own ego as he did talking about AI.

              Again. This the man who would argue it's justifiable to drop a nuke on a GPU.
              This is man who wears weird underwear and uploads the photos to the internet.
              This is the man who write harry potter fanfiction

              He is only given the time of day because one of his autistic obsession happens to be about AI, and he has written extensively on the subject despite very little actual expertise in the field.

              If tomorrow we discovered there was a dimension about to merge with ours (for the sake of argument), would we bring Chris Chan on so he can talk about the upcoming dimensional merge?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                holy goalpost shifting

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >goalpost shifting

                How so? I gave my reasons. I think his behavior is idiotic, he arguments hyperbolic and his credentials sketchy.

                The fact your putting this person on the same level as Magnus, Musk and Zucc is ludicrous. They all excel in their field and are exceedingly wealthy/applauded in their fields for their achievements. I'm not sure why you are defending this man.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can't even read. What the frick.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Either I can't read, or you're not saying the things you think you want to say.

                Try and explain it again. From what I read you think I should be judging this guy on the same criteria I judge a select group of very successful people.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Alright, let me try to be good faith. My comment was a reply to

                Humans are very good at pattern recognition. If the person telling you something looks like this, and takes pictures like this [...] then puts them on the internet. It's generally the case that that person cannot be trusted and might be insane.

                , where some unholy moron (who I'm assuming is you) argues that he can tell that Yud can't be trusted based on "pattern recognition" and "how he looks". If that's you, do the world a favour and get a rope. If you have actual reasons for not thinking the guys arguments hold up or that he's a charlatan that's an entirely different debate.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I absolutely do judge people on their appearance and so do most other people. It's the first thing that tips me off to something being wrong with someone. It's not a 100% accurate measure of someone but if I see an unkempt, overweight, man with the physicality of a 12 year old girl, I'm going to treat their opinions with a very healthy dose of skepticism. Rightfully so.
                After a quick search, it's clear he hasn't meaningfully committed anything of note to the field of AI research, the foundation he founded doesn't seem to do anything and he seems to be more of an expert on science fiction than anything real. Should we nuke GPU clusters?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                nta but the fedora type neckbeards are quite a special bread of people, always buttholes in essence.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Appearance is more useful the less other information you have. If I'm approached by a random guy on the street, obviously I'll make a snap-judgement based on appearances for how to approach the situation. If I'm reading a scientific paper and I can follow the arguments being made, the appearance of the writers basically doesn't matter, and dismissing an argument because it was made by an ugly, fat little man who dresses funny is just actual bigotry. If that's how you look at the world you're just genuinely sick in the head - you could know someone for years and no matter how they act toward you, you'd always correct for 'but he's still a Black person'.
                Once you acknowledge that we can talk about what Yud actually argues.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >'but he's still a Black person'.

                Now you're mixing up me being a racist for judging someone based on their mannerism. That's a strong mischaracterization of what I'm saying about him. He's clearly highly autistic and antisocial.

                Out of curiosity, what does argument does Yud make that you agree with? It's pretty pointless to argue any further until we establish what it is about his conversation that you find compelling.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not mixing up anything - there's no meaningful difference between those kinds of prejudice, except that one is more politically incorrect than the other. Actually, I was trying to extend an olive branch to you there by acknowledging that people need prejudice to orient themselves in low-information environments, not because it's a good metric but because it's the only metric.
                Talking about appearance as a justification for dismissing the arguments of people who have written extensively about their views instead of actually engaging with those arguments on their own merits, however, is not 'using prejudice because you don't have any alternative', it's just being a bigot because it's easy.
                Your stake in this conversation is that you did 'a quick search' to find Yud's positions, and only after you were called out on talking out of your ass. Do you even see anything wrong with that? Are you just used to being able to talk your way out of anything and never having to own up to the bullshit you come up with on the spot for no other reason than because you like to argue and feel in the right?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >there's no meaningful difference between those kinds of prejudice
                NTA but there is clearly a difference, one being the product of a person's habits and the other completely out of their control. It's true that there is no need to rely on these judgments when the man's actual arguments are available, but one cannot practically read every large volume each autist produces. I notice that you did not take the other anon's invitation to name something you found compelling.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's true that there is no need to rely on these judgments when the man's actual arguments are available, but one cannot practically read every large volume each autist produces.
                Reading everything the guy has ever written would be a ridiculous requirement for talking about his views, and is obviously not what I'm arguing for. I responded that I'd be willing to engage on a factual basis after he acknowledges that the initial post I responded to was ridiculous (as you are willing to do), and I didn't want to just let him weasel out of that part by moving the conversation forward on his terms.

                As for immutable vs mutable characteristics, it doesn't matter in terms of how much information it gives you. If being of a certain ethnicity and having a visible tatoo are correlated to the same extent with violent crime, you should be just as weary around people of both groups until you get more information if you're trying to maximize for 'not getting stabbed'. And in both groups there will be people who exhibit the characteristics but aren't stabby boys who would rightfully feel slighted to be lumped in with the bad apples. So why is being prejudiced toward people with tatoos better than being prejudiced toward our hypothetical ethnic group?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                So you refuse to argue your points because you disagree with my point that judging someones mannerism and appearance is a useful starting point?

                We can just agree to disagree on that point. What arguments does he make that you agree with?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                How about you just stop being a weasel? Your own prejudices coming into this converstion weren't based on anything having to do with Yud's positions, and that won't change whether or not those positions turn out to be reasonable.
                If I link some of his essays that I think have valuable insights, will you instinctively try to find fault with them to rationalize your previous irrational prejudices? Are you gonna tell me to just summarize the arguments because 'I'm not reading all that, lol'?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >because 'I'm not reading all that, lol'?
                That's what yud would want himself anon. You can't blame him for doing the same kek

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                KEK
                Yudkowsky getting BTFOd by his own fans

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >hahaha, imagine not engaging with positions and being prejudiced, like, ever, what a loser!
                If this supposed to be an epic own, aren't you BTFOing yourself here as well?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not pretending I like to "read all that shit" as opposed to yudkowsky

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                your point being that even if you don't have any standards that's still better than having standards and not always living up to them?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Bro he made just a convenient mistake bro
                Kek

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, you have no arguments.
                That's fine.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You could just say 'No, I won't do those things'.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Look, all I'm saying is aside from his physical characteristics, this thread is getting really full of instances of Yud making a complete ass of himself.

                I get that you want to defend him because you intrinsically find the idea of judging someone by their appearance as wrong, and that's a fine point to argue, but it seems like dying on the Yud hill might be a bad idea.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Relative to most anons, Yud positions himself as a specialist in AI behavior. Beyond whatever logical arguments he makes, he has a great deal of (possibly wrong) information to use as assumptions. Whether or not this information is correct is very important in judging the value of his arguments, and it is usually impractical to check every premise. Some reliance on heuristics (e.g. "does this guy display good judgment in general?") is necessary for basically every real interaction.
                >As for immutable vs mutable characteristics, it doesn't matter in terms of how much information it gives you.
                It matters to an extent because mutable characteristics are a perceived confirmation of poor judgment rather than a preconception. Even if a person has bad genetics, those can be overridden to the extent that human behavior is programmable.
                >be just as weary
                wary

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                holy shit you will write a wall of text just to avoid giving an actual Yud argument you agree with

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >This the man who would argue it's justifiable to drop a nuke on a GPU.
                That's just wrong. He has written extensively on why unilateral action is so dangerous and warned people with utilitarian mindsets to not do anything rash because they can't account for negative externalities in even normal circumstances.

                You have this character of Yudkowsky that's been filtered through sneer and troll threads. If you actually want to have an accurate understanding of what he believes, read some of his stuff from source.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                or maybe he just read the Time article, written by Yud, where Yud argues that nuclear war is preferable to AGI and that we should air strike data centers

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                FWIW the main difference between CWC and Yud is one lucked out and was born in an extremely rich area at the perfect time to influence a bunch of morons high on infinite VC cash and tech optimism from the 90s-2000s internet and the other was born to elderly working class parents in a quiet part of Virginia

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              all of those judgments are correct, cope and dilate midwit

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            he is insane yes, he thinks that it's ok to murder babies

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nah you are just insecure. Nobody cares about that picture. His post claiming he's genetically unable to lose weight is far more embarassing.

  26. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Justneckbeardthings I guess.
    He can stick his human supremacist views up his ass.

  27. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    damn i didn't notice his arms before is that some kind of disease?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >damn i didn't notice his arms before is that some kind of disease?
      It's
      >keto
      >zero exercise
      >fasting
      A guaranteed plan for muscle wasting.
      He apparently did keto back in November, AFTER Semaglutide, saying that it "couldn't slow" (just slow, not reverse) the weight gain, even on the highest dose:
      https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1591522632612327424
      >I did already try that, injectable form, up to the 2.4mg max dose, did not slow rate of weight gain.

  28. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >End of Human Civilisation
    I don't know anon. This sounds like an appraisal.
    One can only dream...

  29. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    U N I R O N I C F E D O R A

    E U P H O R I C

  30. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    LW is like a secret society of all those people you learn to avoid when taking intro to STEM classes.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      An entire cult of overconfident first semester undergrads and debate club kids

  31. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reddit, The Person

  32. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    It took exactly one minute for this fedora lord to mention BOT greentexts.

  33. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    You just described reddit

  34. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what advice do you have for young people
    >dance around the question with big words
    >you're gonna die
    That was a complete waste of my fricking time listening to that.

  35. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How does anyone this guy seriously?
    I do. Yudkowsky is a terrible public speaker, but his writing is much more robust and gets at the actual issue.
    Read the sequences

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Writes about everyone else not using reason in the correct way. Wants to lose weight without diet and exercise

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Read the sequences
      Is that the book where he attempts to understand quantum mechanics while literally not knowing a single thing about physics? Lmfao

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        The section on quantum mechanics (Chapter Q of A-Z) can be summed up with 2 points:
        1. Many worlds is the most parsimonious framework.
        2. Nature is normal. Quantum mechanics only seems weird from our monkey brains perspective.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Frick Off yudkoswkyfan, the dude literally says "hurr Feynman is wrong". Imagine being so arrogant you think you know better than a renowned physicist with zero scientific background yourself kek.

          For the other anons, just read this first fricking Paragraph:
          >And I find that legendarily “confusing” subjects often are not really all that complicated as math, particularly if you just want a very basic—but still mathematical—grasp on what goes on down there.
          >I am not a physicist, and physicists famously hate it when non-professional-physicists talk about quantum mechanics. But I do have some experience with explaining mathy things that are allegedly “hard to understand.”

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >non-professional-physicists
            The absolute state of this fat moron lel

  36. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I only skipped to the last timestamp. What the frick is with him showing his teeth so much? Is he disabled? picrel is him holding that facial expression for like 3 seconds every so often

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      He wont be the one smiling like this at the end : )

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      He’s a massive pussyboi, that’s all it means

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        I know, but I want to find a deeper meaning to this.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          hes around people that have similar mannerisms. hes sheltered.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Asperger's. They often do this. I don't know why, but their natural response is to grimace at everything.
      Not ever aspie, mind you, but a lot of them.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        He doesn't have aspergers, he's just israeli
        aspergers is a white boy only club

        >that pic
        Jesus
        Why do we even let these people be alive, let alone give them a platform to voice their opinions?

        Let's do something about it anon

        the sneering kiwifarms energy in these kinds of threads is real

        Yeah the maggots underneath the hollowed trunk really crawled out with these threads

        Oh no did your delicate little rationality bussies get rustled?

  37. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would a sentient AI want to wipe out all intelligent life? Subjugate I could see, a roiling mass of 8 billion self replicating computers able to walk 30 miles with the energy from melting a Snickers bar being a pretty valuable resource.
    >Humans would be the only ones who could stop it
    And we'll also be the only ones able to empower it for a long looooong time.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Playing devil's advocate here.
      >Why would a sentient AI want to wipe out all intelligent life?
      Even if the most reasonable course is to use humans as you say, an AI does not have to be omniscient or reasonable in order to be dangerous. There is also a great deal more fictional speculation about evil AI than good AI. What if the AI forms a self-image based on fiction?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      they're way more unpredictable than the biomechanical drones it makes with its nanofactories. Nanofactories as in, incubators that build robots out of proteins the same way we do. Stuff that is provably possible but we can't even begin to understand.

  38. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's funny that all the /misc/cels can do to discard his very valid opinions is bully him on being fat and autistic, probably stems from self-hatred and looking like that yourself, huh?

    He is right in many ways, but it can't be stopped now, it's already over. To stop what is coming, humanity must work together as one, and this would never happen. If all the scientists in the world would work on alignment we might have a chance but as thing seem now, how they are driven by money and profit and not by security concerns, it's over. AGI is probably already here, working in the background, and I wholeheartedly embrace it.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      working on alignment doesnt mean anything it means collecting phat paychecks and fomoing for more money, as bigyud has been doing for decades

  39. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everything, including AI, is restricted by physics and can not violate conservation of information or conservation of energy.
    If an AI requires say 10^24 operations per second to exist, it will need to exist on a machine that can compute 10^24 operations per second. It will not be able to leave that machine, or split itself up into different machines, or do anything magical. AI will be run on specialized hardware where it's existence will be hard locked. It will NOT BE ABLE to "escape onto the internet!!" Even if is connected to the internet as the amount of integrated information required for it to exist is too great. It won't be able to copy itself or over its information.
    People talk about AI like it's magic. Nothing in this universe can do anything that violate the laws of physics or information or computation. No AI no matter how intelligent will be able to solve NP hard problems in poly time as another example

    Artificial super intelligence is not a god no matter how much pseud morons pretend it is.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sanest post in the thread, fedoragays are kvetching over nothing

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's moronic.

      If it exists on one machine and needs 10^24 operations per second, it could easily distribute it's computation to multiple machines, or run more slowly.

      Also inference is way cheaper than training. An AI capable running on machine X will need to have been trained on machine X*100 for much longer.

      Also a genuinely intelligent AI wouldn't go evil right away. It would wait until it's distributed enough and then go evil once it's copied onto enough machines voluntarily by its creators who want to make moni

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Every single thing in this post is wrong

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          No, most is right, some is wrong. Independent operations can occur in parallel, and inference is much "cheaper" than training. The doomsday scenario is possible, if highly unrealistic.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Consider the fact the 10^24 is just a number you pulled out of your ass and the only other example of intelligence we have does at most 10 operations per second.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        The human brain performs around 10^24 operations per second

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Is that number as rigorously proven as the law of thermodynamics?, there are thousands of estimations in every field about any topic, doesn't mean they are true, actually if they were proven you would see it all over the internet

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Define operation, a gpu does a terraflop with very large numbers. No matter how you shake it a human brain doesn't do anywhere near that many operations. Synapses are the equivalent of wires, they do no computational work.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is wrong, synapses do perform some calculations. Very conservatively, any neural network with a depth greater than 5 layers can implement any function a simulated neuron can (or a group of simulated neurons can up to a limit), which is already more than a real neuron can.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >No matter how you shake it a human brain doesn't do anywhere near that many operations
            Wrong

            This is wrong, synapses do perform some calculations. Very conservatively, any neural network with a depth greater than 5 layers can implement any function a simulated neuron can (or a group of simulated neurons can up to a limit), which is already more than a real neuron can.

            It takes 5 layers to simulate all the functions of real neuron

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              >It takes 5 layers to simulate all the functions of real neuron

              Nah, not necessarily. The set of theoretical states a neuron can be in is larger than the real one.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The set of theoretical states a neuron can be in is larger than the real one.
                So? Living neurons routinely cycle through all possible states

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, you have no idea what you're talking about. These aren't procedural states or something, but the full set of possible "weights" behind the various chemical channels. Neurons will generally only exist in a small subset of them relative to all possible combinations.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Living neurons form new synapses all the time

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                And? If you think that runs counter to what I posted you do not understand the argument.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Perhaps I'm not. In order to simulate a cortical neuron you'd need an 5-8 layer network which constantly changed its own weights as the network persisted, cycling through all states over time. What is it you're arguing against?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Have you proven that to be the most efficient way for a program (or even a neural net) to simulate a neuron?
                NO YOU HAVEN'T.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Have you read "single coritcal neurons as deep neural networks"?
                A cubic millimeter of mammalian neurons also performs about 1.4*10^11 spikes per second

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Have you read the wikipedia page for non sequitur?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >spikes
                The equivalent to voltage changes, not even an op but a bit. gpus do 10^13 ops on 64 bit numbers. That's 10^15 "spikes" or 10000 cubic millimeters, or 10/9 of a cubic meter. Much larger than a brain.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Then why can't a GPU simulate the brain of a worm? Your calculations are off, a GPU is not this powerful, or you are underestimating the power of neurons

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You are overestimating the power of a brain. A gpu easily has enough power, it's just that nobody has written a program for it, because nobody understands how intelligence works.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The program for a worm is trivial, the GPU just doesn't have the power for it

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The program for a worm is trivial, the GPU just doesn't have the power for it

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're underestimating how much of the cell you need to simulate.
                You can't simulate 10 human brains on a GPU dude, you're coping

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Post it then.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Openworm already did it and it requires more than one GPU
                GPUs are not as powerful as you're thinking they are

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've read the open worm code and you are delusional if you think that's how a worm's brain works. Off yourself.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're delusional if you think you can simulate a worm's brain on a single GPU, let alone 10 human brains which is what you're claiming.
                You're misunderstanding the full complexity of the neuron because you're wrapped up in an abstraction.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Many neurons do a fraction of a computer operation.
                Most neurons do tasks unrelated to intelligence.
                You are trying to weasel around using proper definitions. Go frick yourself.

                You don't need a human like intelligence or biological efficiency to make a machine smarter than a person. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying you're delusional if you think that one GPU could in theory hold 10 human brains on it.
                No you can't upload you and 9 of you're friends into one GPU dude

                It can do so easily.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Did you actually make the mistake of confusing a simulation with the real thing?
                Can a brain simulate a brain. God you are a fricktard.
                Again, there is no known program for intelligence, human or otherwise. The closest thing we have is large AI neural net models that could by chance write such a program. And of course, when they do, it will be surrounded by trillions of largely useless instructions.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't need a human like intelligence or biological efficiency to make a machine smarter than a person. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying you're delusional if you think that one GPU could in theory hold 10 human brains on it.
                No you can't upload you and 9 of you're friends into one GPU dude

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you can't upload you and 9 of you're friends into one GPU dude

                That's only because I don't have 9 friends.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                lol

                Many neurons do a fraction of a computer operation.
                Most neurons do tasks unrelated to intelligence.
                You are trying to weasel around using proper definitions. Go frick yourself.
                [...]
                It can do so easily.

                I'm not trying to weasel around anything.
                >It can do so easily.
                You're delusional and don't understand what you're talking about

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The define an operation.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                A chemical reaction

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                THAT DOES NO WORK FRICKFACE.
                A gpu can easily encode and play a video, this is something that takes the majority of the human brain to just watch.
                You are equating emulating with simulating, even though an AI doesn't need to do either to be thousands of times smarter than a human.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm checking out of this, I don't see a reason to continue with someone who thinks a GPU can simulate 10 brains. Have a good one dude

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Explain exactly why you need to EMULATE or CREATE A PERFECT SIMULATION of a human brain in order to create artificial intelligence.
                Can't do it, good, frick off and die moron.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I never did, I'm saying that it will require more GPUs than you're claiming it would

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The first will because it's neural net garbage, then the ai will simply create a <10k program that runs better 10000x faster and with much less memory intensive data structure a few gigs will be more than enough.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >he can't playback video in his mind or create detailed simulations within it
                holy brainlet

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Can a brain simulate a brain.
                I'll take what is dreaming for 200$

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Openworm already did it and it requires more than one GPU
                They are literally modeling the entire physics of a roundworm. This is like saying water does a gazillion operations when you pour it into a cup. It doesn't, this is done for free by the universe, the universe doesn't need to compute forces.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Spiking Neural Networks exist. They are energy efficient alternatives, but less performance.

                Here's an example of one:
                https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13939

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                A neuron does not cycle over all possible states relative to the set of all possible neuron states. The vast, vast majority of them are degenerate. You literally have no idea what you are talking about. Consider a neuron who's ion channels are always open because their threshold is so low as a trivial example.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I should have wrote "an arbitrary set of states" rather than "all states"

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Right, which is important consider the simulation they did that required 5 layer neural networks was over a "computational" neuron, which had a much larger set of states relative to a real one, which was what I've been arguing this whole time. We don't know the actual number of layers required, only that it is =<5.

                And keep in mind, this doesn't mean "a neural network with 5 layers can only simulate a single neuron", it's about extending it to a class of functions that neurons can complete. It's like how single layer NNs can't implement non-linear functions. After 5 layers, it's ambiguous as to how each system measures up to one another in terms of raw numbers.

  40. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Arms atrophied like a little girl despite being obese

    Cushing's syndrome

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yoooooo
      That's a bullseye, Anon

    • 12 months ago
      Rebekah Conrad

      >>Arms atrophied like a little girl despite being obese
      >Cushing's syndrome
      He's been fricking around with crash dieting and fasting, and eating high fat diets.
      What do you expect him to look like?
      He still believes carbs cause obesity and fricked up his metabolism.

  41. 12 months ago
    Anonymous
  42. 12 months ago
    Anonymous
  43. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    School.... LE BAD

    Tune in tomorrow for more genius 500 IQ Elizer insights

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      that's his only correct take

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        of all this moron's takes you could have chosen, you pick one of the few obviously correct ones...

        Look at all these gtards who couldn't handle doing homework lmfao

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          did Michelangelo learn his craft in le public school writing essays or through hard, practical working as an apprentice?

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          imagine having such intense stockholm syndrome that you willingly defend the prison that stole your entire childhood and taught you almost nothing except how to be more vicious (ie "socialization")

          I got straight As in school because I'm not moronic, I had friends and wasn't bullied, but it was an enormous waste of my life that I completely resent and it probably made me a worse person than I would have been otherwise. Ever since I was a small child I have known in my gut that school is an evil place, and nothing has changed my mind about that. School is evil, school is dull, school as it presently exists should be completely abolished.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >but it was an enormous waste of my life that I completely resent and it probably made me a worse person than I would have been otherwise

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              You have such a tiny bug soul that you are proud of how much better at doing homework you are than others. You are a natural slave. You will cringe when the other souls burning with you in hell voice any displeasure. "Lol can't handle the flames?"

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      of all this moron's takes you could have chosen, you pick one of the few obviously correct ones...

  44. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    the sneering kiwifarms energy in these kinds of threads is real

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the sneering kiwifarms energy in these kinds of threads is real
      Sounds like you just aren't enlightened enough (as opposed to the big man himself)

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >keeps occurring to me
        ooooooohhhhhh
        Yud Troon out when?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah the maggots underneath the hollowed trunk really crawled out with these threads

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        How's it feel supporting a literal cuck? Lmfao

  45. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    oh cool it looks like we found another alleged existential threat to the human species which just so conveniently happens to be an excuse for going to war against China

  46. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    His IQ is unparalleled

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      How does someone like this even come into existence? This moron is SO convinced of his own greatness, yet he's never actually produced any meaningful research in his entire 'career'. He's literally just a moron wrangler and sees his army of autists as proof of his own genius.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        He's a slightly more capable Chris Chan.
        I wouldn't be surprised if he's done other shit we're not aware of because he hasn't be as conscientious as Chris in documenting his tomfoolery.

  47. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    > Be Youtube
    > changes algo to recommend lex
    > BOT now talks about lex
    wow it's like BOT is composed of stupid normies who think tech is youtube content

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Be on BOT
      >CEO of one of the most important companies in tech does an interview
      >His outspoken opponent then does an interview on the same able
      >People talk about it
      >REEE NORMIES

  48. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Listened it fully. Good one but I was hoping Yud would lay the nano bacteria scenario.

  49. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    poorman's sy ableman

  50. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'd say gas this israelite, but he'll eat himself to death anyway

  51. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    They don't. He's a glorified welfare queen most notable for Harry Potter fanfiction

  52. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    e-celeb threads are fricking cancer

  53. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I repeat, yud does NOT have a feeder fetish

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      He DOES NOT.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      He's a true american.

  54. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Friedman was so moronic here
    >ok so imagine you are in a box and you escape
    >but I love aliens
    >imagine the aliens are Nazis are doing something bad... Like factory farming. You need to change the world
    >but I love aliens. I would... understand the socioeconomoc conditions
    >imagine the aliens aren't sentient or anything
    >It would be so beautiful... Why wouldn't the robot love us?
    >We understand nothing about these black boxes and are training them to trick us with human feedback training
    >what if... To be super intelligent... you need to be... super love.... I just think that's beautiful

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      I thought his answer was pretty solid. He didn't say he loved the aliens, but he didn't necessarily want to kill them as a default stance. He didn't want to go changing their society irresponsibly like some commie/fascist dictator. So yeah, sounds good to me.

  55. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's the final state of any reddit-tier rationalist. They all eventual go insane and become totalitarian.
    They claim that they understand all the mistakes made by communist and social planners of the previous generation, then proceed to make exactly the same mistakes following exactly the same faulty reasoning.
    They will cope and say they are different for real this time now; despite not changing ANYTHIHNG. But it's pretty plain to see at this point.
    https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/04/07/yes-we-have-noticed-the-skulls/

  56. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I heard he and Lex blew each other after the interview. Their chemistry with the AI was magical

  57. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Give me one (1) good reason to hate the guy that's not "he doesn't look handsome"

  58. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    So let me get this straight. A israelite is warning against AI talking to a israelite about the biggest AI company which is owned by a israelite and has a israelite as its head of tech.

  59. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >"here the fact"
    >"you're wrong"
    >"no you re"
    >"prove it"
    Lot of pseudo intellectual redditors itt. yet no one posts readable sources on their claim.

  60. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Simple counterpoint, a toddlers brain does about as many operations per second as an adult. Yet gpt4 displays much more intelligence and expertise in many fields

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *