It's a downgrade because they're running a much smaller cheaper version of it for cost reasons. If you look at the Lambda/PaLM paper the model is way smarter than people are seeing from Bard.
I don't blame them though, even a company as rich as Google simply can't afford to serve a 540B LLM to a billion people. They had no choice but to use a smaller dumber one.
Think about it. GPT3.5 has 175B parameters which is already bigger than LamDA. Of course GPT4 is bigger. Or are you claiming that GPT4 somehow has all the same capabilities plus comprehends images with many billions fewer parameters?
>creates image generators, advanced video generator, music generator, language models. >never releases it >someone else copies the research and releases it. >suddenly realize you lost AI race when you could have been AI giant. Panic and put together something quick and mess up and lose to independent developers.
running on pure inertia. Imagine being on a flight and your pilot dies and a jeet sits in the cockpit. It takes a while for the plane to run out of fuel.
They've got to be the most retarded of gayman for sure
they had the de facto standard ML/AI framework for years and then fucking Zuck comes along and makes a new one that instantly elevates the entire field into the next mainstream meme tech
hurr durr biggest company which counts somw half the world as its users "lost" half of 1% of their users. you think people are done using google? also OpenAI is being sued for using all the open source code Github using the commercial entity Copilot I know I won't be uploading any code to Github anytime soon. sorry not tryin to sound rude.
imagine for the past 10 years or more they've been touting having a "real ai" with a "quantum computer" behind it >time to show off your ai >its even behind ALICE standards >couldn't create a fake facebook profile to save its life
kek "quantum computing"
good morning sir
Bard runs on LaMDA, it's not some kind of downgrade. Bard is the conversational frontend, LaMDA is the underlying model.
they released the 7b parameter version, not the big dog.
they prob don't have the computing power to run that piece of shit with all the spammers on it
It's a downgrade because they're running a much smaller cheaper version of it for cost reasons. If you look at the Lambda/PaLM paper the model is way smarter than people are seeing from Bard.
I don't blame them though, even a company as rich as Google simply can't afford to serve a 540B LLM to a billion people. They had no choice but to use a smaller dumber one.
Lamda is 137B, smaller than GPT-3 and 4.
we don't know how many parameters gpt4 has
Think about it. GPT3.5 has 175B parameters which is already bigger than LamDA. Of course GPT4 is bigger. Or are you claiming that GPT4 somehow has all the same capabilities plus comprehends images with many billions fewer parameters?
it's complete dogshit
they were scared
They are innovators yet retarded.
>creates image generators, advanced video generator, music generator, language models.
>never releases it
>someone else copies the research and releases it.
>suddenly realize you lost AI race when you could have been AI giant. Panic and put together something quick and mess up and lose to independent developers.
running on pure inertia. Imagine being on a flight and your pilot dies and a jeet sits in the cockpit. It takes a while for the plane to run out of fuel.
if the pajeet has fuel in the engines and it is still running then that isn't pure inertia
>computing resources are free
unused cpu is wasted cpu
Bing Ai does not have any of these problems
way too many black trans developers and pajeet chiefs but not enough gnomish people
diversity
They've got to be the most retarded of gayman for sure
they had the de facto standard ML/AI framework for years and then fucking Zuck comes along and makes a new one that instantly elevates the entire field into the next mainstream meme tech
wtf facebook made pytorch?
yep
hurr durr biggest company which counts somw half the world as its users "lost" half of 1% of their users. you think people are done using google? also OpenAI is being sued for using all the open source code Github using the commercial entity Copilot I know I won't be uploading any code to Github anytime soon. sorry not tryin to sound rude.
Big companies can't innovate. The only reason Microsoft is doing well is because they invested in a startup
imagine for the past 10 years or more they've been touting having a "real ai" with a "quantum computer" behind it
>time to show off your ai
>its even behind ALICE standards
>couldn't create a fake facebook profile to save its life
kek "quantum computing"
do the needful sir. thank you
>What the FUCK is their problem?
Putting a street shitter into CEO seat.
But but Microsoft also have Pajeet as their CEO and yet they’re completely fine as they are. Same goes to Adobe.