>OpenAI is eating our lunch? >okay, let's release the shitty budget version of LaMDA.

>OpenAI is eating our lunch?
>okay, let's release the shitty budget version of LaMDA.
What the FUCK is their problem?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    good morning sir

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bard runs on LaMDA, it's not some kind of downgrade. Bard is the conversational frontend, LaMDA is the underlying model.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      they released the 7b parameter version, not the big dog.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        they prob don't have the computing power to run that piece of shit with all the spammers on it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's a downgrade because they're running a much smaller cheaper version of it for cost reasons. If you look at the Lambda/PaLM paper the model is way smarter than people are seeing from Bard.

      I don't blame them though, even a company as rich as Google simply can't afford to serve a 540B LLM to a billion people. They had no choice but to use a smaller dumber one.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lamda is 137B, smaller than GPT-3 and 4.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          we don't know how many parameters gpt4 has

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Think about it. GPT3.5 has 175B parameters which is already bigger than LamDA. Of course GPT4 is bigger. Or are you claiming that GPT4 somehow has all the same capabilities plus comprehends images with many billions fewer parameters?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's complete dogshit

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    they were scared

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are innovators yet retarded.

    >creates image generators, advanced video generator, music generator, language models.
    >never releases it
    >someone else copies the research and releases it.
    >suddenly realize you lost AI race when you could have been AI giant. Panic and put together something quick and mess up and lose to independent developers.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    running on pure inertia. Imagine being on a flight and your pilot dies and a jeet sits in the cockpit. It takes a while for the plane to run out of fuel.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      if the pajeet has fuel in the engines and it is still running then that isn't pure inertia

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >computing resources are free

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      unused cpu is wasted cpu

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bing Ai does not have any of these problems

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    way too many black trans developers and pajeet chiefs but not enough gnomish people

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    diversity

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They've got to be the most retarded of gayman for sure
    they had the de facto standard ML/AI framework for years and then fucking Zuck comes along and makes a new one that instantly elevates the entire field into the next mainstream meme tech

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      wtf facebook made pytorch?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        yep

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    hurr durr biggest company which counts somw half the world as its users "lost" half of 1% of their users. you think people are done using google? also OpenAI is being sued for using all the open source code Github using the commercial entity Copilot I know I won't be uploading any code to Github anytime soon. sorry not tryin to sound rude.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Big companies can't innovate. The only reason Microsoft is doing well is because they invested in a startup

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine for the past 10 years or more they've been touting having a "real ai" with a "quantum computer" behind it
    >time to show off your ai
    >its even behind ALICE standards
    >couldn't create a fake facebook profile to save its life
    kek "quantum computing"

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    do the needful sir. thank you

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What the FUCK is their problem?
    Putting a street shitter into CEO seat.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      But but Microsoft also have Pajeet as their CEO and yet they’re completely fine as they are. Same goes to Adobe.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *