ONLY 42 DOLLARS A MONTH FOR CHATGPT

Yep, it's a steal.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Meh it's good value all things considered.

    I've had it write my unit tests for me on several occasions. Probably saved 1000s of lines of tedious shit for me

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >42 dollars a month for a glorified search engine that tells you to stop searching for things

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I've had it write my unit tests for me on several occasions
      Can you give an example? This is genius.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you can literally just copy and paste the code and ask for an unit test in whatever framework you want.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I've had it write my unit tests for me on several occasions.
      the codebase at my work uses so much custom shit that this would be pretty much impossible without pasting tens of thousands of lines of additional context in chatgpt

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I haven't tried it yet, but I heard Copilot is better at learning the context of your codebase and providing more plug and play solutions.
        With ChatGPT, you can keep a single chat history with all the context you want it to remember and can talk it through multiple iterations until it's close enough to what you need, but ime you always have to do some refactoring to get it to compile, but it's still better than spending hours writing it all by hand.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If all you do is code, copilot does pretty much the same job for a fraction of the price.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Copilot:ChatGPT::Tactics:Strategy

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you can buy a bride for that money in pakistan

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >brown eyes
      i'll take the chatbot, thanks

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Revolutionary start of the art language model
    >REEE IT SHOULD BE FREE FOR ME TO QUERY THEIR SERVERS AND HAVE THEM RUN HUNDREDS OF REQUESTS FOR ME

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Revolutionary start of the art language model
      >It should be free for me to query their servers and have them run hundreds of requests for me

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry sweetie, you don't get to beg for money when your machine steals billions of content made by users, some of which is copyrighted.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      even free it's not worth a shit.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'd gladly paid $42 if it was an uncucked version.
        I'd have it right so much coom shit

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        just tried

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm actually surprised it responded that way, I was expecting something more feminist-approved along the lines of

          https://i.imgur.com/3InkttO.jpg

          even free it's not worth a shit.

          under the guise of "wamyn have histrionically blah blah blah so discrimination against men is empowering and actually a good thing"

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You didn't, this image has been making the rounds on 4chan lately. You're a skullfucked dunce.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >makes a joke about white people anyways, but refuses to do so for black people
          lobotomized garbage.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a steal. It's not like you even have a choice they could've charged 500 a month it's still required to even compete

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've ignored AI until recently. Is there some open source ChatGPT I can run locally and train myself? I plan to use it as a development aid. Even if it's not as good, I don't like being reliant on the whims of some subscription service.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes all you need is like 100gbs of ram and you can train your own with billions of words of text.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You say that as if either of those were some insurmountable obstacles. Only challenge is the software is all locked up.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes that's why I encouraged you to make your own because you're never going to get the companies precious software that no one else besides Google has.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so like... 2 or 3 window 7 64bit computers? man that would cost like shit dude.... 600$? thank you merchant you are my greatest ally.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/pSljwj3.jpg

        Yep, it's a steal.

        This is what I am hoping for the future as well. The model needs a huge amount of RAM currently. If anyone takes the time to scale it down (not their priority for quite a while) it would be great. In fact, I would be happy with having to buy a separate SSD just to run it whenever. But for now if they restrict it to being pay-for only I would settle for paying at most ~$50/month. Anything more and I am splitting it with some peers.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        OPT is the open source equivalent, courtesy of Facebook. It has several model sizes, with -175B being comparable to GPT-3 and -66B being comparable to Chat-GPT. You might be able to get -66B to run if you have >16GB of VRAM, but there's some hoops you have to jump through with less than 40GB. -6B and -30B are more reasonable for local hosting on consumer hardware.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You need about $100,000 worth of GPUs just to have enough VRAM to run it
        And good luck training it yourself

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If I remember correctly, openAi could only afford to train it once since it was so astronomically expensive. And they had billions of dollars of donations from ~~*Microsoft*~~ and Elon Musk and who knows else.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I think this depends on what you do for a living.
      I've recently started contributing to a library that is used for calculating cross sections in the context of particle physics.
      For that ChatGPT hasn't been useful other than to explain C++ syntax to me.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I gave up on that shit when I had to give them my phone to sign up and use the damn thing.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Zoomers get to spend $42/month to save hours on bullshit homework every week
    bros, we got shafted being born too early

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Local instances fucking when? What good is it if you're tied by your neck to a 1 trillion dollar corporation?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've ignored AI until recently. Is there some open source ChatGPT I can run locally and train myself? I plan to use it as a development aid. Even if it's not as good, I don't like being reliant on the whims of some subscription service.

      Couldn't you just run it locally? Text generation can't be any more complicated than generating images and that works locally.

      Hello anons. I am here to give you the machine learning answer to "why is there no local GPT?"
      Text is a much higher dimensionality space than images. It takes relatively few numbers to describe each individual pixel (the atomic unit of image models), but it usually takes hundreds of numbers to describe the meaning of each word (atomic unit of text models). Text models often start at 512 dimensions, and although that can be reduced via ICA etc etc, it's always going to be a fuckhueg amount of parameters, to the point where you need more VRAM than a 4090 will give you to run a generator.
      The tech that makes Stable Diffusion viable on a home PC will not work on text. So even though text is "smaller" data-wise, generating meaningful text is actually much harder than generating meaningful images.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        umm sweetie, we all have hundreds of GB of VRAM laying around from mining shitcoins.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Well in that case go grab Karpathy's GPT training repo off Github and go nuts. The algo is out there, hardware is the limiting factor.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Well in that case go grab Karpathy's GPT training repo off Github and go nuts. The algo is out there, hardware is the limiting factor.
            Retarded take. If they release the model today, by the evening hundreds of people would be running independently.
            The training is the limiting factor, hardware doesn't really matter.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This.
              8x A100 (80GB) would be like $190k total and that's fucking nothing compared to the training cost.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >to the point where you need more VRAM than a 4090 will give you to run a generator.
        Not just more VRAM, but 22 times more, you idiot. The model OpenAI uses is 500+ gb.
        You can substitute it with NVMe, but you will get abysmal speeds, think like 1 token per minute.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Hey, you double retard gay, I'm trying to speak generically and for the understanding of casuals. There are more text generators than GPT-3 davinci, which was not developed to optimize for footprint at all. Text models can drop down to as low as ~40gb and still have some utility. And yes, you can technically run a model off flash memory, but not for real-time applications.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There are more text generators than GPT-3 davinci
            Everything else is a fucking meme. Even curie is a meme compared to davinci.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can just build a box with 500 gigs of ram.
          Load decoder0 into VRAM, forward propagate while loading decoder1 into VRAM at the same time, forward propagate while loading decoder2 into the memory where decoder0 used to be, etc.
          That's assuming you can fit 2 decoders into VRAM, you can also do it one by one or even more granular than that.

          Just give me the weights and let me worry about running it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        consoomer level TPUs when
        >still not powerful enough
        consoomers will keep pushing the demands the same way they did with GPUs for vidya

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >being poor

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >$42 a month for an ai that can lie to you

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck off you entitled commie.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      communism is when services are reasonably priced
      "i'm not paying $8 for a fucking mcdonalds burger" - carl marks

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd pay that if they fixed their privacy policy.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Couldn't you just run it locally? Text generation can't be any more complicated than generating images and that works locally.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would they let you run it locally if they can charge you a subscription fee for access to their lobotomized version instead?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I haven't followed this at all, isn't it based on some open source deal? Just train a model on wikipedia or something and off you go.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          As it turns out, OpenAI is a bit of a misnomer.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's "Open" in the sense that they used your data (even copyrighted material) to train it, you get jackshit in return

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Didn't use my data so I don't care. Further if you put it out there you can no longer expect others not to copy it.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    and copilot is $10 a month.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Copilot is barely better than regular intellisense. Chatgpt is easily 100x better than copilot at 4x the price.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do I get an api if I buy that?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they have an api already anyways. The best one is davinci I think. They might jack up the price for that though.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sucks but it was inevitable. Would be best to make all of it $42/mo to price out the scammers and their useful idiots slowing it to a crawl lately.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *wheeze* AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *inhale* HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    no

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    inb4 $1/2 month third party websites that use chatgpt api

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone tested this yet? How much faster is the response speed?

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >query the botnet
    yea no thanks, let me know when it's a download

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's a lot

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >hire 42 brownoids
    >hire 1 AI
    I'll take the AI

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/
      The AI is literally just brownoids bro

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT is for retards who can't code anyway.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sauce

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Suddenly BOT loves subscription model.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If it didn't have crazy filters, orange warnings and constant moralising and nagging, it would be worth that.

    Also it should be given access to a calculator, so that it stops making constant errors in basic math.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      did they remove the {pretend you are <>} feature?
      i haven't tried it in months

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd pay $5/mo, but not $42.

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    chatGPT leak when?

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What’s going to be the plan if no one goes to the paid version? There’s virtually no difference

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What’s going to be the plan if no one goes to the paid version? There’s virtually no difference

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are still being generous leaving a free version to be honest. I was willing to pay, but 42 I am afraid might be too much for my dollar-subjugated coin.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >API access was free and cheap as shit
    >now it's going to skyrocket in price because of normies
    FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The only people I know who use ChatGPT use it to generate pickup lines. You give normies the collective and concentrated sum of all human knowledge for free and this is what they use it for.

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >paying money to train an ai to replace you

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ok but do you still need to give them your phone number?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you not have a phone?

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll give you fifty if you let it say moron.

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >already pay $20 a month for cooming to GPT-3
    if the $42 gave me a better model, i'd do it in a heartbeat.

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >not Training a state-of-the-art model yourself

    The absolute state of BOT

    Has everyone here become a brainlet?

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT "product" is the AI lobotomy

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the worse part of this is that the paid version doesn't even give you unlimited gens

  38. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I got it to "imply" the word gay. supposedly, moron wouldn't be much different

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      What is the point of this?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        One of the things it's actually not too bad at is bouncing creative writing off of. but the very constricting rules it has gets in the way. So there's some experimenting going on to see how one could get around it, making it come up with things it otherwise wouldn't.
        Or, to make an AI homophonic and racist, if you will.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          ah! I just noticed it still removes one of the stars. clever girl

  39. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    So that's the price of the pajeets on mars

  40. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If they let me use it without it’s bullshit nerfing system it’s a literal steal.

  41. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >$42
    What a weirdly specific number. Did they ask ChatGPT itself how much they should charge or did they calculate how much they could charge based on the kinds of questions they saw being asked and by how many people?

  42. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I was using this to write my thesis untill I realized the style of writting is so typical of an essay made by some highschooler I stopped using it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *