>new AI is basically AGI

>new AI is basically AGI
How are we supposed to find work now when it can probably do every compsci related work?

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you want to be a wagie? Don't find work. Pursue your own projects.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Projects require money. No, the government is not going to fund your existence through UBI, they'll just leave you to die.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Do you want me to eat projects?

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >new AI is basically AGI
    kek. what an ignorant

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      lmao have fun being poor lolol lmaooooooooo i'm lmaoing at ur life lolol fricking luddite lolol you don't le get it lol lmaoooooo

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        *puts my hands gently on your cheeks*
        *you blush as i look into your eyes*
        *snaps your neck*

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        sounds like impotent rage/cope

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    mechanical engineer here i'll be one of the last people to lose their jobs
    realistically civilization will collapse first too lol

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      kek.
      you will be surprized, but classical engineering is one of the jobs people should actually worry about.
      and it has nothing to do with MLAI.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >pic
        and that's exactly why engineers won't be replaced any time soon
        t. another anon

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          its a status quo.
          its already happened :/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >put it into a system
            >it fails because ai hallucinated the heat treat parameters or didn't consider obscure problems like the ability of media from postprocesses to get into a specific corner of the part

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              ai != ml tho.
              you got a lil something called symbolic ai thats based on hard rules, not stats
              no hallucination there

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i'll maybe start to slightly worry when there's an autorouter that doesn't suck

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                that sounds like an interesting problem to solve

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        they've been trying to standardize my job for 50 years, it's been a disaster

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          its still a wip, but honestly, codifying an engineer's math into a program is something that can and already was codified into software.
          like with cad-type software and the simulations therein

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            setting up analysis boundary conditions is something 30% of the entire engineering employment base spends their time doing, honestly the fetish for computer analysis has caused more employment for what was napkin math before

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              oh yeah, of course
              thing is, if you automate all the actual math in the process youre left with... napkin math.
              and you dont need an engineer for that

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >and you dont need an engineer for that
                this is just plausible enough for companies to have already tried it with human AI aka indians
                enter the 737 max

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                idk, man... i really dont know

                mech/elect. engineering is the kind of problem that should easily be automated.
                its rigid rules applied systematically. not much creative work involved in that, no?
                you get design parameters and then you work your way through the numbers...

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >nta
                The issue is that things which should work, only ever do about 50% of the time, if that. I'm a metal fabricator. I routinely have to track down my engineer because he overlooked something, or something isn't workable with the tooling we have. So he has to (begrudgingly, with things said under his breath) retool his design based on what I and my coworker encountered when going over the design, or test fitting the part, etc. That's where creativity comes in.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                now this sounds like a really interesting problem to solve
                idk if i can, but it wont prevent me from trying

                in absolute you should be able to bruteforce fabrication methods until you find a good enough solution that is achievable with your current tooling.
                and thats the worst case scenario...
                big bonus: no more oversights or errors.

                ai tools will never replace ALL the engineers, because we will continue to invent new methods of fabrication
                and we will need true creativity there

                but it stands to reason that ais could replace engineers for numbercrunching and for already existing fabrication methods

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I follow your thinking, but I'm not sure I see it happening any time soon. I'm not even sure I'm able to articulate why. But based on my experiences at work, I get the feeling a computer would have a stroke trying to deal with some of the problems we run into. Even the machinists run into way more problems with designs than you might expect.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                yeah im talking about this in the most abstract of senses
                im not a machinist (despite being a big fan of metalworking and engineering in general), im a programmer.

                but in principle it is something that should be achievable with the technology and concepts we have today.
                even a computation that would be extremely inefficient compared to how an engineer operates would still do because it would be just a matter of throwing enough computing power at the problem

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >human AI
                >indians

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Still no AI to replace CEOs. What a pointless technology.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      CEOs are unnecessary to begin with.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Find another career.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *