>lying will be impossible within 5 years. >every below-average man will have an AI gf within 10 years

>lying will be impossible within 5 years
>every below-average man will have an AI gf within 10 years
>fully functional artificial embryos within 20 years
femalesisters… I don’t feel so good..

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can turn off my mind at will and think stupid irrelevant things like sexualized anime characters, unusual medical diagnostic cases, primates, and the ingredient list of the cereal that I ate for breakfast. Thankfully, this should give me immunity for the future.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that is easily acounted for in AI programming. there's literally nothing you can do better than AI. give it a proper body and even if you are a turboslut it will outclass you. humanity is about to get btfo'd by AI

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I can draw a hand though

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          idk anon the stable diffusion threads have a lot of decently drawn hands. I think this meme is kinda stale at this point.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            go to /sdg/ and take a closer look

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            nobody pushing the hand meme in %currentdate% has any idea of how AI even works. just let them be retards so when they're too far behind to ever catch up you can point and laugh.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that's just a silly detail.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          go to /sdg/ and take a closer look

          draw a better hand than this. I’ll wait

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This one?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I think he meant the one where the index finger splits into two fingertips and the ring and middle fingers merge.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Does it draw hands ok if that's the subject matter? Why not train a separate model that detects bad hands and another that fixes them?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Why not train a separate model that detects bad hands and another that fixes them?
                this has literally already been done and it's leagues above where we were a few months ago
                these are mostly solved issues that are getting better as time goes on.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            get back to me when it does feet well

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Proompt and model?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >implying human artists are good at hands
          Also
          >controlnets

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >that is easily acounted for in AI programming
        Wouldn't they have to train on one's own mri data?

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >femalesisters
    well now u know why you're getting replaced by sex robots

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >thought police starts scanning my brain for dangerous thoughts
    >immediately start thinking about goatse and tubgirl

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If lying was impossible, this tweet wouldn't be made.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks AI bros, not only have you automated most of humanity, you've now made sure we can never have a private, personal, thought ever again. I'm sure glad AI proponents exist, humanity would surely be worse off if they were shot in the streets like dogs.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What is so good about privacy of thought? Wouldn’t it be better if we knew the people around us? This will only help the species advance forwards as those with abysmal thought patterns (and actions) will suffer and be weeded out.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        are you perhaps chinese?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Fuck off seele

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >those with abysmal thought patterns (and actions) will suffer and be weeded out.
        And who determines that what is abysmal thought patterns? You know its garden gnomes, right?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Everyone has something to hidem even you.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i for one am completely ready to replace all my human interactions with machines
    im already pretty sure 20% of posts on this board are from bots

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think it doesn't read your mind but the brain cells that are activated in response to optical nerve activity.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i want to say this is garbage because clearly if you measure brain activity when looking at these pictures and then measure brain activity when thinking about these pictures and then give all the data to a computer of course it can figure out because its just finding patterns in data, and if thats how they did it then its of absolutely zero value because you could be thinking of a different stuffed bear and the computer wouldn't know because it hadn't sampled that before. its like saying shazam could identify a new song you just made up, no it has to be a song in its database.
    and then they just shit it through [popular thing of the moment] to churn out a paper for clout.

    however, i do remember seeing years ago long before ai was viable, a documentary where they were trying to create pictures of peoples dreams from brain data and they did produce some basic shapes and outlines. but at the same time i could be thinking about a fictional film.
    but either wat the ai aspect has no value.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It could help describe things where words otherwise fail. An alternative to police sketches would be a good use-case. Most people don’t have sufficient vocabulary to describe someone’s face precisely, even though they may be able to recall the face clearly in their minds.
      Have a bit of imagination, anon

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We need a biig biig database for this to even work. Database needs evey face combination possible to be injected into it. So that the computer can do some comparisons
        Prolly impossible

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Plenty of massive datasets of images of faces exist, though. You wouldn’t need every unique face to make it generalizable either, just like you don’t need every individual subject that stable diffusion is capable of genning in its training dataset.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You wouldn’t need every unique face
            yeah especially for some races: chinese etc

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's not how it works in even the most remote sense.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The goal wouldn't be to have an exact match, it just needs to beat police sketches which isn't an impossibly high bar.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it is probably as you say anon
      Ai is nowhere to be smart in any way in real sense yet

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Holy ESL

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      While it is an interesting study, it shows that we don't know at all what the fuck the human brain is doing. And this is just the visual cortex. The study is not focused on the rest of the brain, just the visual cortex.
      The researchers needed an text-annotated dataset for the "c" variable - which seems to be doing all the work in telling Stable Diffusion what to draw.
      The text-annotation is extremely context specific to the study in question, and not applicable out-of-sample. It's one-one mapping of visual cortex data to the text-annotation of the image. This means the output space is literally 1/10,000 pre-labelled text-annotations. Not really impressive. And again, this is doing all the work!
      The "z" variable is a representation of the actual raw image data from the brain. And it's pretty dogshit.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >trains look like dogs
        what the fuck

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      glad we have a real expert on our hands. how many years did you study this, anon?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        science in general being lame garbage academics writing bunk papers on nothing fluffing their profile manipulating results being paid off by industries sponsoring research?
        i was an academic researcher and observed things like this for about 15 years.
        this particular project no i never had any involvement in.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >i was an academic researcher
          Lolno you weren't. You don't even know what that even means, as evidenced by your choice of words.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But isn't the point of AI generalizing data so it can give you a good guess even if the input isn't in its data base? SD can generate pictures it hasn't been fed, ChatGPT can write text it hasn't seen, so what's stopping AI from interpreting brain data? Obviously it's not perfect, but it can probably give you a decent guess

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >what's stopping
        You need matched brainwave sequences <-> image actually being seen (or whatever else) for this to work. And lots of it, like millions at the bare minimum. Then you need some assumptions, like the process must be consistent, so for example if there's high redundancy in neurons and you can fetch the same memory at random from multiple neurons, you'll probably never end up learning. Or if the signal you collect is not actually what decides how you picture something, then that won't work either.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >thought police is gonna be real
    we're fucked, aren't we?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon remember, it will be applied to the politicians as well. No one will be able to escape it. We will advance towards a society of men and women that can succeed without relying on dishonesty. We will be more resilient and unified after we adapt.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what exactly is gonna change when we already know the politicians are lying?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          most people are retards, anon. At least a quarter of the country thinks Biden isn’t a creepy lying pedo

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            In my country everyone knows each and every politician is lying and yet nobody is doing anything about it as long as we get to live moderately comfortably. Maintaining a convenient status quo is just easier

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it will be applied to the politicians as well

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that's exactly why "they" pulled the brakes on AI. they got scared. not for humanity, but for them. we are not scared, they are.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            interesting point of view

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Most likely. Hence why they're trying to legislate everyone into lobotomizing their programs and requiring approval. They've already seen what happened when the internet was allowed to develop organically unabated.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >think about anal prolapse 24/7
        >walk through a globohomo security cuckpoint
        >the guards recognize me and turn the monitors off

        >it will be applied to the politicians as well
        [X]

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Politicians and the wealthy will be exempt. It will be used against commoners. Don't experience positive emotions when you see the LGBTBLM flag? You get fired from your job.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          right.. people are just going to allow that to happen without complaining at all… ok… whatever you say dude

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They'll complain, sure. But they won't be able to stop it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just like they've allowed it to progress this far and do nothing, yes.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine this shit applied to the population of a country that already has the highest number of people behind bars in the entire world. Think of the money being made in prison labor right now, then imagine the fortunes those businesses will reap once AI ThoughtCrime detection really takes off. lol. lmao.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Depends how you look at things.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the difference between what you are thinking about now regarding AI, and what will actually happen is exactly like you watching a funny video with a playful bear on youtube vs actually meeting an enraged brown bear, in the woods, all by yourself.
    we completely and totally forgot what it means to not be the apex predator on Earth. shit's about to get wild.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Big catch: You have to be in an fMRI machine for it to work.
    It works for images presented to the person, but did they try asking people to picture something in their mind? How far are we from being able to create art or search for files simply by imagining what we want?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      aphantasia folks can't use it

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They'll have to wait for the verbal version where you can think words. Or they can use the thing the military developed that measures minuscule movements in the voicebox when you subvocalize / whisper silently without any breath.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I have aphantasia and no internal voice.
          Abstract Cerebrationchads stay winning

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >aphantasia
        hmm I’m not sure what to think about this. I don’t like that these retards will have such an advantage. I hope they will have their thoughts decoded just as easily. Or at least their emotions. There will be ways to prompt for the truth regardless, it will just take a bit of interrogation

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How do people with aphantasy think in general? I read it always in people with alexithymia and aspergers

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          in a weird way it seems designed to cut bullshit out. if it were a feature

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          think of it as less attack surface, which makes certain things stand out. it's enough to give you extra clues in many situations.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the same as all people, but very mechanistic. their "fantasy" is basically a garrys mod with mods, can't draw art and read fiction

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            and is a spectrum not on/off thing. which makes for varying ways of doing the same things normies are doing, each with its own twist.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        They'll have to wait for the verbal version where you can think words. Or they can use the thing the military developed that measures minuscule movements in the voicebox when you subvocalize / whisper silently without any breath.

        How do people with aphantasy think in general? I read it always in people with alexithymia and aspergers

        >aphantasia
        hmm I’m not sure what to think about this. I don’t like that these retards will have such an advantage. I hope they will have their thoughts decoded just as easily. Or at least their emotions. There will be ways to prompt for the truth regardless, it will just take a bit of interrogation

        aphantasia isn't real, unless you're actually brain damaged
        dumb fucks who think theyre aphants are just mentally lazy. they believe closed-eye hallucinations should be available to them at anytime without the use of a psychoactive drug lmao what retards

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          why would you assume psychoactive drugs manifest visually in aphantasiacs?

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >shown teddy bear with purple ribbon
    >thinks of a teddy with orange ribbon
    Can this be used to diagnose color blindness as well?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's probably more of a problem with StableDiffusion. Even without passing the image through a brain first, it will often change details like that on img2img.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >think about illegal things
    >infect fbi agent computer with it
    >call police on him

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's horrifying considering thought policing has become 100% normalized. You will be sent to a reeducation camp in your lifetime.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wait a sec ai moviegays and ai doomergays never these freaking ai can read our minds. The jerks literally made tinfoil hat legitimate now.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Now?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/YvtJH70.png

      Now?

      according to chatgpt-4 a lead hat would block the CT scans and a faraday cage would block the mri scans. so my a metal tinfoil hat i guess and also it said copper should also be used.

      the problem with tinfoil hats is that if you’re exposed to radiation from all angles then it just bounces around in your head as the hat reflects the waves.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        full tinfoil bodysuit it is then

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's shit fucking ancient and that pic shows no improvement from the results we had in ~2010. The paper in this tweet is probably literally from 2010 or something.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is what chatgpt-4 said about it. it can use the internet now so it was able to be up to date.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Robot makes most nuanced and high-quality post in a sea of shitposts

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous
  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    according to chatgpt-4 a lead hat would block the CT scans and a faraday cage would block the mri scans. so my a metal tinfoil hat i guess and also it said copper should also be used.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A metal hat would wreck the MRI machine. It would also rip your head off probably.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Source?

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wtf i love the antichrist now

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    True. AI is too good and used too much. I never had an AI gf.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That paper was pure sophistry. They pointlessly added AI to the middle of something that already existed.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I doubt this would be permissible in court if this came to pass. Although I would bet some jobs would require it anyway.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WE TRIED TO PREVENT THIS BUT YOU JUST HAD TO SAVE THE garden gnomeS

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >think "moron moron moron"
    >model's own directives prohibit it from replicating "moron moron moron"
    problem solved

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fully functional artificial embryos within 20 years
    If AI is that capable and is nice, it won't let new conscious minds be born in biological bodies.

    Of course it might be a shitter.

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AI face when it reads my mind

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Politicians will have to have their mind read to the public as a form of transparency
    Never gonna happen

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody gonna mention how you need to train the model on each individual to be able to read their thoughts reliably?
    How my brain represents an image of a plane will be quite different from how anyone else does. They say in the paper that the trained models aren't transferable between people.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh wow, my first nightmares that I still remember are about to become reality.
    Well, if they force it for everyone, it won't be that bad.

  31. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >women on suicide watch
    >effeminates on suicide watch
    >zoomers backtracking on all their bullshit like they didn't mean it.
    good tech.

  32. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    this won't work on me because all it'd generate are pictures of my waifu

  33. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The new Apple eyewear device is merely a foundation to what's coming next.

    They'll eventually insert a new brain-wave detector technology directly into the headset. Now every wearer is being Thought-Read through the device, which is now monitored by the government. People will praise this technology because now everyone needs to wear it to function in the new coming Ai society.

  34. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >get brain chipped
    >think racist thoughts while watching MSM
    >police show up at your door
    I give it 30 years before this is reality.

  35. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Mandatory for politicians.

  36. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Noooooooooooo they'll know I'm deepfaking my coworkers with my mind!!!!!!!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *