LLM/AI - de Finetti's theorem

Can some smart bros please explain de Finetti's theorem in a language that I, a moron, can understand? I've been trying to look it up, but I've been getting filtered by all the terms and context.
Alternatively, what would be a good place to start in a path to understanding all this?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's cope for AI tards. I'm not even joking. They want their AGI and they want to believe that GPT-4 is the first real step towards that. Ultimately, it's still just an autocomplete.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It may not be AGI, but clearly LLMs can produce valuable results, and people who made them didn't just pull them out of their asses lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If you are against LLMs at this point you are either not a programmer or never used it
      It's like stack overflow on steroids
      It's as if the biggest experts on stack overflow were waiting for you to ask your dumb question and immediately answer you no matter how stupid the question is and produce a reply exactly to your specifications
      And that's just part of what it can do
      It's a fricking miracle that's what it is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > Ultimately, it's still just an autocomplete.
      So just like your brain then

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't know humans are turing machines, considering one is not limited in ways the latter is

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, I hope you put more thought into your... thoughts than just picking the next more probable tokens in a string.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I never do
          Just blurt out whatever comes to my brain
          Sometimes I hear a little voice saying "DON"T SAY THAT!!!!"
          Then I make sure I repeatedly say it over and over again
          Nobody tells me what to do

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >why yes, I do have Tourette's, how could you tell?

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't you get Bing AI to explain it for you?
    That's what I do when I'm lazy to read papers

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why have it explain it to you when you can have it take action based on the paper? Thinking is deprecated.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        LLMs are just as vulnerable to bias and being wrong as we are, based on their training data.
        You should treat them as just another person in the room. High in knowledge, low in wisdom

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No dude they're a literal god, haven't you read the papers? AGI will realise tomorrow

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, I read that it would cost $1000 to permanently cripple any dataset scavenging efforts from now until eternity

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm sure we'll have an even cheaper way if we just ask ChatGPT to plan that! Even then if someone asks it to fix the data our efforts will be in vein

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thank you, anon!

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    After getting Bing AI to explain de Finetti's theorem and its relation to AI models, I have concluded that the OP was word salad and not meant to prove anything other than a plea for ego stroking.
    The theorem states nothing more than an abstract claim about some probabilistic models, and has a tenuous connection to AI models, making no claims about AGI in general.
    It's sort of like saying, "Hitler was a vegetarian therefore he did nothing wrong."
    While both may be true statements, there is no clear logic connecting one statement to the other.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's a trivial observation that if you are "just predicting the next word" on a very difficult multi choice test that you have never seen before you must be doing something very smart.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >y'all Ö/

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *