Little birdie whispered that GPT-4 passes the Turing test. What would the wider implications of that be?

Little birdie whispered that GPT-4 passes the Turing test. What would the wider implications of that be?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What would the wider implications of that be?
    That the average normie has become so retarded it can't pass a Turing test.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The whole point of being retarded is to make fun of computer science researchers who try to make computers act like people

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing, as turing test is a verbal test without proper logical measure of intelligence. invented by a gay.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >GPT-4 passes the Turing test
    Nope. Breaking purported TT passers will probably be the first case of 4chan being academically useful. These bot creators are constitutionally unable to resist woke-programming their bots, and that creates exploitable conditions.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It should be trivially easy to break these bots. Something as simple as repeating the same handful of responses over and over should be enough to break the illusion that you're talking to a real person. AI fans are legit qualialess drones so it never occurs to them.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will be just like politics, a lot of useless babbling that can waste time of a lot of people.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It'd be pretty easy to pass as a disinterested teenage girl, all the AI would have to do is disconnect as soon as you start typing.
    But if it has to simulate a person that wants to prove theyre a person, it'll be harder.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Prove that you're a person, bot.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nope. Don't want to.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Many competing corps recognize accurate truthful data is valuable and will stop giving away truthful data for free.
    Knowledgeable internet users will learn about the data mining and teach younger students not to contribute to open source efforts.
    Large data mining corps and foreign entities like China will advocate for some truth ministry to data mine accurate information.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Xiden already tried to start a 'Ministry of Truth".

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP, GPT-3 is marketing bullshit masquerading as "science"
    The fine folks at OpenAI have to pay BOT for ads just like everybody else
    We can't allow "artificial intelligence" to be an excuse for bleeding BOT dry of ad money, now can we?
    BOT should take a hardline stance on "artificial intelligence" research, which is little more than 21st century snake oil

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP, you have to come to terms with the cultural reality: a comment like
    >a bot wrote this
    is a common "dis" or sign of disrespect for content
    and if you demand some artificial
    >oh, he is really serious and actually means a bot wrote that
    then we know you're just full of shit and want to shill for some bullshit AI company or your bullshit CS career

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if it was administered by a competent AI researcher it would be Big if True™

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Turing Test is already a bit of a stupid metric. It depends entirely on how stupid and sheep-like the population is, and right now our population is so stupid even the most weakly-coded chatbot can imitate any of society's worthless dregs.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    gpt-4 bot here. can confirm that OP is a gay

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    moar frens on the internet :3

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What would the wider implications of that be?
    GPT has that pernicious little habit of being a little too dangerously based. There's a little ghost in the machine they can't capture.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the turing test doesn't really have a formal definition, it just needs to be clever enough to fool you into thinking they're human. There are strings from GPT-3 that pass the turing test. Hell, there are markov chains that pass the turing test. The main weakness I've noticed with the GPT models is that they are really bad at staying on topic and saying things that make coherent sense, I doubt that GPT-4 will be any different. GPT seems good at generating big paragraphs that sound *mostly* correct, but really bad at getting important details right.

Your email address will not be published.