It's starting. Companies are starting to permanently downsize because of ChatGPT.

It's starting. Companies are starting to permanently downsize because of ChatGPT. You realize you people are going to collapse the world economy with this LLM shit, right? How the frick can you be okay with that?

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good, let's hope it spirals out of control and the normalBlack person bodies pile up in the streets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      your mom has to go outside to get your food and necessities, why do you want her to suffer?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >implying I'm not a LLM myself

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How game changing is this shit?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It literally renders most white-collar work obsolete. Who hire an accountant when you can just have an LLM do your taxes far faster and better than the accountant can? Why get a lawyer when you can have an LLM defend you using the entire corpus of case law? Humans are garbage at most of this shit compared to LLMs.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Why get a lawyer when you can have an LLM defend you using the entire corpus of case law?
        Kek i can already image that one spergy tard who wants to represent himself and thinks reading the output of chat-gpt off his phone will make the court see him as some genius, while in reality he's probably just going to be judged as unfit for trial and dragged by the tard wranglers to nearest asylum.
        Later he'll claim this was all 4d-chess and 7 years in therapy was worth it for getting out of 2 months of community service for public masturbation.
        Screenshot this, it'll happen.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You don't read from a phone. An AI listens to the court proceedings and talks to you through an earpiece. Within a couple years at most, law AIs will be so much better than human lawyers that paying for representation will be seen as legal suicide.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Within a couple years at most
            While I share your enthusiasm for AI to some degree, it's time to learn that the next big thing is always around the corner. Usually for couple decades. And every decade is the decade it will totally come true. And then the hype fades and shifts onto another next big thing while researches continue to work on whatever they've been doing for ages anyway. In couple years maybe AI will be able to draw hands properly.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >maybe AI will be able to draw hands properly.
              So much this. Why did no one think of AI detecting abstract object and it's physical state/orientation before training the model?
              Like it wouldn't be a rocket science.
              Human -> 2 hands and 2 legs.
              Cat -> 4 legs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Because the AI model is a pixel hallucination model and just like ChatGPT, it's actually an autocomplete function. It takes a prompt and hallucinates a plausible response given the prompt context and it's stored knowledge. People need to stop thinking these models are intelligent.

                >ERP uncensored model
                Good luck being called a 'National Threat' when it becomes competitive.

                And? The fact is its what everyone wants to use. When the lights are off and they think no one is looking, everyone will use that model because it's not going to moralize them.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >model is a pixel hallucination model
                Why did no one think of adding extra abstraction layer of physical model, is a mystery.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Because that's magnitudes more difficult than just having it read pixels and a prompt and distill it and it's not even CLOSE to the method being used. You might as well say "why didn't they train ChatGPT on videos of cats and dogs alongside the text so it understands the context of cats and dogs when it writes text about them".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >why didn't they train ChatGPT on videos of cats and dog
                It's being said that one of AI research teams is working on an AI video generator, tho.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah and you know what they're going to do? Show a series of pixels. It'll probably be trained on what we'd perceive as a film strip. 5 frames of images at a time with a prompt instead of a single image.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Then, at least they are won't create their own replacement.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                These AI models are tools, no one is getting replaced except for people who have been pretending to work.

                >everyone knew the gig / personalized economy is the future
                That's literally just communism with extra steps. "You will own nothing, you won't even have a job, and you will be happy." Frick you Black person.

                Well gee, it's almost like AI makes certain resources that used to be scarce, abundant so maybe the economy doesn't make sense being aligned around the scarcity of those resources.

                >that should be easy to do
                The only limit is their willingness to invest into the infrastructure.

                Or you're just a moron attempting to trivialize a difficult problem. How about we get image generation using stupid pixel hallucination to run in real time at 1080p first, yes?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >How about we get image generation using stupid pixel hallucination to run in real time at 1080p
                Even if the model is inefficient. If you are able and willing to employ infinite infrastructure, it will work. It's a basic math.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Eventually the architecture itself becomes the bottleneck. You simply couldn't run a model that requires 100 TB of VRAM in real time. Again, you're trivializing a difficult problem and you're too much of a brainlet to even understand the difficulties of scaling. The fact is ChatGPT is already too big for a datacenter and it's an embarassing stupid AI with only 4000 tokens of context memory. We need an AI that is at least twice as complex that can run on at least 100,000 tokens of context memory to actually start replacing people's jobs. Simply not happening any time soon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You simply couldn't run a model that requires 100 TB of VRAM in real time.
                That was my previous point. It's not possible for a civilian, but totally not impossible for Big Tech aided by donations from the government and it's military spending.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >That was my previous point. It's not possible for a civilian, but totally not impossible for Big Tech aided by donations from the government and it's military spending.
                It's totally impossible if you understand how thermodynamics and network latency works.
                >yeah bro just put 1000 GPUs into a single server

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Like US military is 20 years ahead as always.
                They probably use some rare materials Terahertz Optic CPUs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So you're just talking about fantasy then?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >fantasy
                Fanta sea.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I mean guessing the armature and it's transformations. It shouldn't be too hard with neural networks.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                "They should just make an neural network that knows how to change a text prompt into a scene using 3D models, that should be easy to do".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >that should be easy to do
                The only limit is their willingness to invest into the infrastructure.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it's transformations
                >it is transformations
                What did he mean by this

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There is no coming back after 7 years drugged and daily butt stretched by troony nannies in an asylum.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >he thinks accountants just record transactions

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The accounting economy will be decimated when one accountant is as productive as 10 are today.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            that's what they said when the field switched from paper to electronic
            granted, I'm not an accountant, that's just something I've heard before

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Who hire an accountant when you can just have an LLM do your taxes far faster and better than the accountant can?
        A by-product of machine learning is an unknowable nest of errors hidden in code not actually written by anybody, meaning any company using AI for actually important functions would require a team of dedicated AI handlers to diagnose it when it fills every field with "Black person" for no reason. There are no and never will be 'set and forget' AI solutions that actually replace humans practically when they're made by other computers through trial and error.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sweet summer child. You have not seen what I have seen.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Writing for the internet is very specific in format, fonts and style, you would think that a lot of that work is done by bots or by people from other countries abroad, ChatGPT can be fed with a massive amount of data on those generic articles that news sites need to get traffic, the schematic and repetitive nature of it all makes ChatGPT the perfect tool to have just a few people writing hundreds of articles using that tool.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is killing the monolith model, everyone knew the gig / personalized economy is the future. The era of going to the store and buying the same generic flower in a vase picture that got printed 100 million times is over. Want a picture for your wall, get a personalized one. Want the opinion news based on current events? The AI can do it better.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is killing the monolith model
      How so if the real AI part will happen in giant computation centers, owned by big corps?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The widespread proliferation and mainstream adoption of AI is hindered when large corporations lock down the technology and keep it proprietary. This limits the access and use of AI for smaller companies and researchers. In order for AI to truly become mainstream, it should be accessible to a wide range of entities and not just controlled by a select group of large corporations. The assertion that AI will be both widespread and controlled by a few corporations is unrealistic and would limit the full potential of AI. The real innovation in AI is driven by researchers and individuals who are learning how to effectively train and manage AI, as demonstrated by the success of open-source image AI projects. For example, while DALL-E is considered a state-of-the-art model, it falls short when compared to open source models like Stable Diffusion.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >totally doesn't look like gpt generated text
          In the end the M$ (plus Big Tech) will own most of the patents and infrastructure. Source being 'open' doesn't mean much while Intellectual Property laws exists. Also the trained model won't ever leak outside their servers.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You are correct that large corporations like Microsoft and Big Tech companies may own a significant portion of patents and infrastructure in the AI industry. However, it's important to note that open-source projects and the sharing of techniques and information are still vital to the advancement of AI. People are already training text models from scratch, and even if the GPT model is closed-source, the techniques for creating and running AI have been published, allowing others to replicate and build upon the work. Additionally, the nature of AI and the ease of generating new data and models, makes it increasingly difficult to enforce intellectual property laws. As a result, it's likely that the laws will have to evolve to keep up with the rapid advancements in AI technology.

            Also don't care what some unemployed doomer thinks.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Also don't care what some unemployed doomer thinks.
              Good. Stay safe.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You have zero impact on the economy and society as a whole.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You have zero impact on the economy and society as a whole.
                I hope so. I'm trying to be as neutral to the world as it's possible.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          we're on path to the world of Dune

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Muh gig ekonomics

      Prepare to get screwed by gigacorporations with your Uber type ekonomy, Neocab style.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah of course, everyone is going to use the locked-down cucked AI! That's why it's going to be so popular. Because it's locked down and proprietary and it's definitely not going to be the ERP uncensored model that's going to explode into mainstream. No, everyone wants the soiboy ChatGPT model.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >No, everyone wants the soiboy ChatGPT model.
          Yes.jpg

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >ERP uncensored model
          Good luck being called a 'National Threat' when it becomes competitive.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >everyone knew the gig / personalized economy is the future
      That's literally just communism with extra steps. "You will own nothing, you won't even have a job, and you will be happy." Frick you Black person.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wait 'till they install these features onto actual armies of anthropomorphic automatons. Sentient androids manufactured in China. The future is bright.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >End of this shitty society one way or another

      Yes. The future is bright.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bring us back to the renaissance model of labor or scholars.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    fug

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >going to collapse the world economy
    frick the global economy, it never gave anything to me.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >20
    so it's fricking nothing

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NO, NOT MY HECKIN JOBERINOS

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The Washington pest isn't downsizing because of chatgpt. They're offloading staff because we're heading into a recession

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This isn't because of AI. No company is ready to deploy AI for any position that could be held by humans, it would be a legitimate legal nightmare and the technology in its current form is even less reliable than the most mediocre of 90IQ white collars.
    This is happening because Blackrock's Aladdin lost $1.3 trillion and investors are scrambling for quick revenue and companies have to comply by cutting their operating costs as much as possible. Economy's legit going down the shitter, because this all has a domino effect (and less consumer spending = crash).
    And no, your barely functional chatbot won't save us.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT has an IQ of 82. This is what was produced after billions spent in data centers and training. This is the peak of the current techniques and bottlenecks of hardware.

    People are being fired because of economic reasons you fricking mongoloids. Bunch of low iq doomers hoping people become redundant because they're too stupid to work in tech or other high paying sectors.

    Look how interest rates and reflexivity in markets work and maybe lookup mass layoffs and bubbles over the last 3 decades you idiots. Powell has quite literally stated he wants to slow the economy. That's what the fricking FED does. They did it in 2000.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >because of ChatGPT
    you mean because of elon musk proving that 99% of big tech is adult daycare

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI replacing news people
    so they are admitting they were always useless puppets then?
    not a great loss

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care, I'll go live (or die) in the woods while the rest of you kill riot over a single drop of AI generated cum.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >You realize you people are going to collapse the world economy with this
    oh no

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >oh no i wont have to do a BS job for 40 hours a week wahhh waaahh

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Go grow crop of something. People will always need quality food.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      cant wait for chatgpt to convince the supreme court that low frequency low quantity heroin use will actually benefit society

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >another OpenAI shill thread
    The absolute state of BOT

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Companies are starting to permanently downsize because of ChatGPT

    No, companies are downsizing because of a slowing economy, a US proxy war sanction policy that is hurting consumers more than the intended target and the prospect of a 31 trillion dollar debt hangover.

    Chatgpt is about number 20 on the list.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >someone is laid off in a recession
    >ITS CHATGPT (technology that has existed for 3 years now)
    is this the vax of BOT

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >some machine replaces 10,000 factory workers with families to feed

    LOL learn to code loser evolve or die

    >some machine replaces 10,000 buzzfeed catladies and manbabies

    OMG the ENTIRE world economy is literally collapsing

    Frick off b***h get a real job.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what would you consider a real job

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >inflation and recession are AI

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it's actually true
    >yet idgaf

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *