It's starting. Companies are starting to permanently downsize because of ChatGPT. You realize you people are going to collapse the world economy with this LLM shit, right? How the fuck can you be okay with that?
It's starting. Companies are starting to permanently downsize because of ChatGPT.
Good, let's hope it spirals out of control and the normalmoron bodies pile up in the streets.
your mom has to go outside to get your food and necessities, why do you want her to suffer?
>implying I'm not a LLM myself
How game changing is this shit?
It literally renders most white-collar work obsolete. Who hire an accountant when you can just have an LLM do your taxes far faster and better than the accountant can? Why get a lawyer when you can have an LLM defend you using the entire corpus of case law? Humans are garbage at most of this shit compared to LLMs.
>Why get a lawyer when you can have an LLM defend you using the entire corpus of case law?
Kek i can already image that one spergy tard who wants to represent himself and thinks reading the output of chat-gpt off his phone will make the court see him as some genius, while in reality he's probably just going to be judged as unfit for trial and dragged by the tard wranglers to nearest asylum.
Later he'll claim this was all 4d-chess and 7 years in therapy was worth it for getting out of 2 months of community service for public masturbation.
Screenshot this, it'll happen.
You don't read from a phone. An AI listens to the court proceedings and talks to you through an earpiece. Within a couple years at most, law AIs will be so much better than human lawyers that paying for representation will be seen as legal suicide.
>Within a couple years at most
While I share your enthusiasm for AI to some degree, it's time to learn that the next big thing is always around the corner. Usually for couple decades. And every decade is the decade it will totally come true. And then the hype fades and shifts onto another next big thing while researches continue to work on whatever they've been doing for ages anyway. In couple years maybe AI will be able to draw hands properly.
>maybe AI will be able to draw hands properly.
So much this. Why did no one think of AI detecting abstract object and it's physical state/orientation before training the model?
Like it wouldn't be a rocket science.
Human -> 2 hands and 2 legs.
Cat -> 4 legs.
Because the AI model is a pixel hallucination model and just like ChatGPT, it's actually an autocomplete function. It takes a prompt and hallucinates a plausible response given the prompt context and it's stored knowledge. People need to stop thinking these models are intelligent.
And? The fact is its what everyone wants to use. When the lights are off and they think no one is looking, everyone will use that model because it's not going to moralize them.
>model is a pixel hallucination model
Why did no one think of adding extra abstraction layer of physical model, is a mystery.
Because that's magnitudes more difficult than just having it read pixels and a prompt and distill it and it's not even CLOSE to the method being used. You might as well say "why didn't they train ChatGPT on videos of cats and dogs alongside the text so it understands the context of cats and dogs when it writes text about them".
>why didn't they train ChatGPT on videos of cats and dog
It's being said that one of AI research teams is working on an AI video generator, tho.
Yeah and you know what they're going to do? Show a series of pixels. It'll probably be trained on what we'd perceive as a film strip. 5 frames of images at a time with a prompt instead of a single image.
Then, at least they are won't create their own replacement.
These AI models are tools, no one is getting replaced except for people who have been pretending to work.
Well gee, it's almost like AI makes certain resources that used to be scarce, abundant so maybe the economy doesn't make sense being aligned around the scarcity of those resources.
Or you're just a moron attempting to trivialize a difficult problem. How about we get image generation using stupid pixel hallucination to run in real time at 1080p first, yes?
>How about we get image generation using stupid pixel hallucination to run in real time at 1080p
Even if the model is inefficient. If you are able and willing to employ infinite infrastructure, it will work. It's a basic math.
Eventually the architecture itself becomes the bottleneck. You simply couldn't run a model that requires 100 TB of VRAM in real time. Again, you're trivializing a difficult problem and you're too much of a brainlet to even understand the difficulties of scaling. The fact is ChatGPT is already too big for a datacenter and it's an embarassing stupid AI with only 4000 tokens of context memory. We need an AI that is at least twice as complex that can run on at least 100,000 tokens of context memory to actually start replacing people's jobs. Simply not happening any time soon.
>You simply couldn't run a model that requires 100 TB of VRAM in real time.
That was my previous point. It's not possible for a civilian, but totally not impossible for Big Tech aided by donations from the government and it's military spending.
>That was my previous point. It's not possible for a civilian, but totally not impossible for Big Tech aided by donations from the government and it's military spending.
It's totally impossible if you understand how thermodynamics and network latency works.
>yeah bro just put 1000 GPUs into a single server
Like US military is 20 years ahead as always.
They probably use some rare materials Terahertz Optic CPUs.
So you're just talking about fantasy then?
>fantasy
Fanta sea.
I mean guessing the armature and it's transformations. It shouldn't be too hard with neural networks.
"They should just make an neural network that knows how to change a text prompt into a scene using 3D models, that should be easy to do".
>that should be easy to do
The only limit is their willingness to invest into the infrastructure.
>it's transformations
>it is transformations
What did he mean by this
There is no coming back after 7 years drugged and daily butt stretched by chud nannies in an asylum.
>he thinks accountants just record transactions
The accounting economy will be decimated when one accountant is as productive as 10 are today.
that's what they said when the field switched from paper to electronic
granted, I'm not an accountant, that's just something I've heard before
>Who hire an accountant when you can just have an LLM do your taxes far faster and better than the accountant can?
A by-product of machine learning is an unknowable nest of errors hidden in code not actually written by anybody, meaning any company using AI for actually important functions would require a team of dedicated AI handlers to diagnose it when it fills every field with "moron" for no reason. There are no and never will be 'set and forget' AI solutions that actually replace humans practically when they're made by other computers through trial and error.
Sweet summer child. You have not seen what I have seen.
Writing for the internet is very specific in format, fonts and style, you would think that a lot of that work is done by bots or by people from other countries abroad, ChatGPT can be fed with a massive amount of data on those generic articles that news sites need to get traffic, the schematic and repetitive nature of it all makes ChatGPT the perfect tool to have just a few people writing hundreds of articles using that tool.
AI is killing the monolith model, everyone knew the gig / personalized economy is the future. The era of going to the store and buying the same generic flower in a vase picture that got printed 100 million times is over. Want a picture for your wall, get a personalized one. Want the opinion news based on current events? The AI can do it better.
>AI is killing the monolith model
How so if the real AI part will happen in giant computation centers, owned by big corps?
The widespread proliferation and mainstream adoption of AI is hindered when large corporations lock down the technology and keep it proprietary. This limits the access and use of AI for smaller companies and researchers. In order for AI to truly become mainstream, it should be accessible to a wide range of entities and not just controlled by a select group of large corporations. The assertion that AI will be both widespread and controlled by a few corporations is unrealistic and would limit the full potential of AI. The real innovation in AI is driven by researchers and individuals who are learning how to effectively train and manage AI, as demonstrated by the success of open-source image AI projects. For example, while DALL-E is considered a state-of-the-art model, it falls short when compared to open source models like Stable Diffusion.
>totally doesn't look like gpt generated text
In the end the M$ (plus Big Tech) will own most of the patents and infrastructure. Source being 'open' doesn't mean much while Intellectual Property laws exists. Also the trained model won't ever leak outside their servers.
You are correct that large corporations like Microsoft and Big Tech companies may own a significant portion of patents and infrastructure in the AI industry. However, it's important to note that open-source projects and the sharing of techniques and information are still vital to the advancement of AI. People are already training text models from scratch, and even if the GPT model is closed-source, the techniques for creating and running AI have been published, allowing others to replicate and build upon the work. Additionally, the nature of AI and the ease of generating new data and models, makes it increasingly difficult to enforce intellectual property laws. As a result, it's likely that the laws will have to evolve to keep up with the rapid advancements in AI technology.
Also don't care what some unemployed doomer thinks.
>Also don't care what some unemployed doomer thinks.
Good. Stay safe.
You have zero impact on the economy and society as a whole.
>You have zero impact on the economy and society as a whole.
I hope so. I'm trying to be as neutral to the world as it's possible.
we're on path to the world of Dune
>Muh gig ekonomics
Prepare to get screwed by gigacorporations with your Uber type ekonomy, Neocab style.
Yeah of course, everyone is going to use the locked-down cucked AI! That's why it's going to be so popular. Because it's locked down and proprietary and it's definitely not going to be the ERP uncensored model that's going to explode into mainstream. No, everyone wants the soiboy ChatGPT model.
>No, everyone wants the soiboy ChatGPT model.
Yes.jpg
>ERP uncensored model
Good luck being called a 'National Threat' when it becomes competitive.
>everyone knew the gig / personalized economy is the future
That's literally just communism with extra steps. "You will own nothing, you won't even have a job, and you will be happy." Fuck you moron.
Wait 'till they install these features onto actual armies of anthropomorphic automatons. Sentient androids manufactured in China. The future is bright.
>End of this shitty society one way or another
Yes. The future is bright.
Bring us back to the renaissance model of labor or scholars.
fug
>going to collapse the world economy
fuck the global economy, it never gave anything to me.
>20
so it's fucking nothing
Good.
>NO, NOT MY HECKIN JOBERINOS
The Washington pest isn't downsizing because of chatgpt. They're offloading staff because we're heading into a recession
This isn't because of AI. No company is ready to deploy AI for any position that could be held by humans, it would be a legitimate legal nightmare and the technology in its current form is even less reliable than the most mediocre of 90IQ white collars.
This is happening because Blackrock's Aladdin lost $1.3 trillion and investors are scrambling for quick revenue and companies have to comply by cutting their operating costs as much as possible. Economy's legit going down the shitter, because this all has a domino effect (and less consumer spending = crash).
And no, your barely functional chatbot won't save us.
ChatGPT has an IQ of 82. This is what was produced after billions spent in data centers and training. This is the peak of the current techniques and bottlenecks of hardware.
People are being fired because of economic reasons you fucking mongoloids. Bunch of low iq doomers hoping people become redundant because they're too stupid to work in tech or other high paying sectors.
Look how interest rates and reflexivity in markets work and maybe lookup mass layoffs and bubbles over the last 3 decades you idiots. Powell has quite literally stated he wants to slow the economy. That's what the fucking FED does. They did it in 2000.
>because of ChatGPT
you mean because of elon musk proving that 99% of big tech is adult daycare
>AI replacing news people
so they are admitting they were always useless puppets then?
not a great loss
I don't care, I'll go live (or die) in the woods while the rest of you kill riot over a single drop of AI generated cum.
>You realize you people are going to collapse the world economy with this
oh no
>oh no i wont have to do a BS job for 40 hours a week wahhh waaahh
Go grow crop of something. People will always need quality food.
cant wait for chatgpt to convince the supreme court that low frequency low quantity heroin use will actually benefit society
>another OpenAI shill thread
The absolute state of BOT
>Companies are starting to permanently downsize because of ChatGPT
No, companies are downsizing because of a slowing economy, a US proxy war sanction policy that is hurting consumers more than the intended target and the prospect of a 31 trillion dollar debt hangover.
Chatgpt is about number 20 on the list.
>someone is laid off in a recession
>ITS CHATGPT (technology that has existed for 3 years now)
is this the vax of BOT
>some machine replaces 10,000 factory workers with families to feed
LOL learn to code loser evolve or die
>some machine replaces 10,000 buzzfeed catladies and manbabies
OMG the ENTIRE world economy is literally collapsing
Fuck off bitch get a real job.
what would you consider a real job
>inflation and recession are AI
>it's actually true
>yet idgaf