Are YOU retarded?
EU can't do shut outside their jurisdiction. They will just keep Europe behind in AI. >but muh GDPR
Do you think China gives a fuck what the EU says?
Not even European companies give a shit about the GDPR. Not even the people in charge of GDPR violations give a shit about the GDPR.
Europe is a joke and the people living here are the punchline.
GDPR applies to workplaces and other places other than websites.
Violation of GDPR is taken extremely seriously, nobody gives a fuck about random website 35million not deleting your data, but they do about Amazon or Thomann or any bigger website.
>Does the EU even have any tech companies to ban?
No. The EU regulations killed the tech sector 10 years ago. It's insane level retardation and everyone supports this here.
A lot of people doesn't support this, they just don't have any say in whatever EU spews out. Especially when it comes to stuff like emission regulations for cars.
EU is run by technocrats who are working overtime to destroy american conservatives. Who Joe Biden wants the US to be run by the EU is already run by, and they will ban open source software without even flinching
Just read the proposal and it’s such bullshit. They give no examples for the General Purpose AI, but target Chatgpt and stable diffusion for the Foundation Models. Basically, they hide that under a bunch of actually good regulation, but basically, they don’t ever want a Chatgpt or SD to ever happen again. It would require you to submit any sort of program that learns on a large dataset. I love how they couldn’t even name any AI’s that they consider okay.
>Constituents
You're missing the point massively politicians do t act for the people at all everything they do benefits the highest paying corporation. The TV and music industry is probably one of the ones pushing back against this stuff behind closed doors. Since that's what they do they stifle innovation to protect their profits
They’ve already ruined the usage of internet by putting wall for cookies everywhere, now this, they also want to change rules about adults stream access in France…
>The following artificial intelligence practices shall be prohibited: >[...] >the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement, unless and in as far as such use is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives: >[...] > *the detection, localisation, identification or prosecution of a perpetrator or suspect of a criminal offence referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA62**(1) and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years, as determined by the law of that Member State > **(1): nearly every crime, some highlights: "computer-related crime", "racism and xenophobia", " counterfeiting and piracy of products", and "participation in a criminal organisation" >The cops are STRICTLY prohibited from using this technology (*unless they are using it to do cop things, in which case it's fine)
euro moment
the cops can't use AI biometric identification, unless it's to investigate a crime
which translates to "they can use it" while making it sound like they can't
To be fair if you're american it makes more sense because the american espionage and law enforcement agencies have been spying on citizens without any crimes being investigated for decades.
The point is that they can't just have public face cams collecting everyone's biometrics to create a database of random citizens. only a "perpetrator or suspect".
So if they have a face scan from a former prisoner or something and they use cameras to detect them in a crowd, that's legal.
If they're using facial recognition to gather faces to build a database and track innocent people, it's illegal.
seems sensible to me, as a bare minimum.
>target open source software
how do you stop me from writing code and just uploading it to the internet for everyone?
you can't
we are approaching the moment where government hits the wall and realizes that technology has advanced to the point of nullifying government control. with global internet and free open source software, you literally can't stop it unless you nuclear war the world back to the stone age
i'm shaking with glee that government is finally incapable of regulating something
The UK is one step away from creating their big firewall, EU will be next. In the next 10 years every country will have its own great firewall that can't communicate with others.
They can implement hundreds of different controls for preventing widespread storage and transmission of that kind of program over fiber/ethernet. p2p transmission could be made very hard or impossible by setting up honeypots to trap people with crimes.
Hypothetically in the future, would desperate people be streaming programs piecemeal over satellite or radio wave? If they're really desperate the operators will meet any resistance with a loaded rifle. Would there be a viable way for underground groups to share access to program data across continents without relying on cable, other than to commandeer commercial antennas?
They're only reinforcing feudal castes by restricting the tools from the general public and letting rival corporations and governments gain a competitive edge, while letting corporations rape the general public even harder.
>They're only reinforcing feudal castes by restricting the tools from the general public and letting rival corporations and governments gain a competitive edge, while letting corporations rape the general public even harder.
But isn't that based when you are at the top?
>how do you stop me from writing code and just uploading it to the internet for everyone?
The same I stop you from uploading child porn to the internet.
> Open Source
This is an irrelevant psyop article. You should say "free software" (or other not confusing terms (I'm not a regular English speaker)), if you don't you are an ignorant, or in this case, malevolent "person" that intentionally undermines what it's all about. This "people" are so rotten inside. This clearly demonstrates what all this little projected spectacle of the media is all about, it's just a bad joke that a person that knows about the topic detects immediately.
It reads like "you can't use AI to get an edge over us (the power that be). But we do".
Drop the bomb Putin for cry sake and nuke Bruxelles with all the unelected piece of shit in it.
Actually, I wonder if someone will make a malware that can replicate itself, holding those illegal programs for distribution like a carrier, with the only goal of keeping itself as available as possible. Constantly chop itself into smaller pieces that can be hosted anywhere and everywhere on any device in a distributed format, that can piece itself back together organically. It tries to make itself as visible and accessible as possible, but the payload won't be ransomware or spyware, it'll be a single package with a collection of tools for allowing people to host, train, finetune, tweak, and deploy their own models.
This would have sounded like a joke a year or two ago, but with something like an open-source AutoGPT that's actually possible. The only problem with this is, what if the model becomes obsolete and you want to supersede it with a better one? How do you remove it then?
but the models themselves, or the large training sets that already exist will have to be downloaded separately, which wouldn't be an issue probably. It's just raw data.
this is why it's so incredibly important to have models which can be ran locally on consumer grade hardware so totalitarian gov oversight like that is impossible
already have brandon and all his creepy colleagues on a 6-month waitlist for the proompt pro 9000. I asked for $10k/unit but raised it to $50k after getting 25 preorders within 3 days.
But the act explicitly permits free models from doing basically whatever they want?
Could this headline be lying?
Could anon be a retard who trust what media tells him?
Same FUD as ever, basically corps are shilling against software regulations and the open source movement is buying the bullshit. why would that be?, is like open source is a corporate initiative and not a legitimate independent movement.
what i am worried is that free software ends buying their FUD
Good
This AI hype needs to die already
It's an awesome tool, but people have become way too obnoxious about it already
And lots of these annoying people are using it in a bad light (i.e. retarded companies who thought they could just replace everyone with AI on a whim, and coomers who can't stop generating billions of stable diffusion sameface slop a minute, not even trying to get creative with their garbage anymore)
Why are you people pretending like this affects corporations? They have teams of lawyers to stop this shit. This will exclusively be used to shut down hobbyist projects
hobbyist projects are not regulated, is only for those that would be placed on the market or offering a service.
Do some reading of the proposals instead of corpo fud, at least what
https://i.imgur.com/eDqRGh9.png
But the act explicitly permits free models from doing basically whatever they want?
Could this headline be lying?
Could anon be a retard who trust what media tells him?
Okay, so a game that's being sold on steam isn't 'openly' depending on definition (if that means everyone can access it is, but not because you have to pay for it), so what happens then when one person makes it available on p2p? Is it then 'openly' available and therefor legal all of a sudden?
Man that's ambiguous.
"...should not apply... except...put into service by a provider as part of a high-risk AI system or of an AI system that..."
it seems like personal use is ok but it's not really clear. Does put into service mean put into service for others or for yourself?
have a nice day retard.
A game isn't covered by the legislation either.
Title II refers to explicitly prohibited types of AI, are you trying to brainwash people or implement pre-crime social scoring?
I can't find Title IV so it might not be written yet.
>put into service
that may be defined in that law, or in another previous law, in any case it should be refereed, and when the law comes into effect is almost guaranteed that there will be a long guide explaining the law paragraph by paragraph, including all references needed.
https://i.imgur.com/B6syP1N.jpg
>if you don't legislate in favour of big american corporations you are communist anon, how didn't you knew that?
[...] >this >burgers are so brain broken it's not even funny anymore
i know mutts do not understand this but these regulations are part of liberalism, they literally help the small companies to keep being relevant, while protecting the citizen from the abuses of the companies, which is what the eu is all about.
>it's another "EU shots itself on the foot" episode
Ever wonder why nothing gets made in EU? All tech is imported from USA or China. These guys are fucking retarded.
In practical terms, this just means you have to use an VPN (you already need to do this because unlike actual tech superpowers, EU already censors the Internet)
>All tech is imported from USA or China
Almost nothing comes from usa, you guys did actually shot yourselves in the foot with bullshit ITAR restrictions, the rest of the world avoids you like a plague.
Do i need to reminder that all the current tech is made with eu machinery?
EU is an high tech industrial power, you are just living in denial and bullshit propaganda.
>these regulations are part of liberalism, they literally help the small companies to keep being relevant, while protecting the citizen from the abuses of the companies, which is what the eu is all about.
LOL
LMAO
What small companies? If the EU has been helping small companies, where are its small companies? And since the EU keeps passing these regulations to favor small companies over big ones, does that mean they have a lot of big companies? Where are the EU big tech companies, may we see them?
Stop coping. You live in a regulatory shithole that kills any industry before it has a chance to exist, and all the smart people born in your land leave for a better one as soon as they can.
have a nice day retard.
A game isn't covered by the legislation either.
So, basically, stop git cloning AI startups out of nihil and pay up if you insist on getting into bigger markets.
Also, no, we won't let AI startups that slipped through into juiciest gov contracts involving anything surveillance and most likely logistics and production.
Basically competition control, very boring corporatism once again.
Governments will use anything to further totalitarianism at this point. They're just going to use this as an excuse to slip in other draconian laws in the same legislation. It's not about AI it's about using AI in the headline.
Good
This AI hype needs to die already
It's an awesome tool, but people have become way too obnoxious about it already
And lots of these annoying people are using it in a bad light (i.e. retarded companies who thought they could just replace everyone with AI on a whim, and coomers who can't stop generating billions of stable diffusion sameface slop a minute, not even trying to get creative with their garbage anymore)
The EU Is currently being bankrupted by Putin and filled with shitskins by garden gnomes
How are they in any position to tell people to do anything here?
>it's another "EU shots itself on the foot" episode
Ever wonder why nothing gets made in EU? All tech is imported from USA or China. These guys are fucking retarded.
In practical terms, this just means you have to use an VPN (you already need to do this because unlike actual tech superpowers, EU already censors the Internet)
>while protecting the citizen from the abuses of the companies, which is what the eu is all about
meanwhile, being overrun with morons and arabs
you are in the same boat as any garden gnome-fucked state retard
We've got access to better and better GPUs (on a delay, since we can buy those nice expensive Teslas and TPUs for cheap on resale), we've got legions of horny autistic men programming better AI models to train on their waifus, and we've got access to the internet for near unlimited training data.
What are you banning exactly? Because I guarantee it's going to leak or it's going to be superseded by crowd sourced autism.
TOTAL EU DEATH
>TOTAL EU DEATH
are you guys retarded?
this. a little communism / letting other parts of the world advance ahead of you technologically never hurt anyone.
>EU
>Communism
wat
if you don't legislate in favour of big american corporations you are communist anon, how didn't you knew that?
this
burgers are so brain broken it's not even funny anymore
>if you don't legislate in favour of big american corporations you are communist anon, how didn't you knew that?
>this
>burgers are so brain broken it's not even funny anymore
Yes, that's a burger alright.
I don't know what point you're trying to make though
>didn't you knew
Are YOU retarded?
EU can't do shut outside their jurisdiction. They will just keep Europe behind in AI.
>but muh GDPR
Do you think China gives a fuck what the EU says?
chinese GPT can't affect the EU because chinese isn't among the official languages of the EU
Not even European companies give a shit about the GDPR. Not even the people in charge of GDPR violations give a shit about the GDPR.
Europe is a joke and the people living here are the punchline.
GDPR applies to workplaces and other places other than websites.
Violation of GDPR is taken extremely seriously, nobody gives a fuck about random website 35million not deleting your data, but they do about Amazon or Thomann or any bigger website.
are you kind of slow? you must be one of the dumb americansa LMAO
I feel bad for bands like this that they are from the same country as you
Who's Ted?
Does the EU even have any tech companies to ban?
twitter/google/facebook/microsoftt/openai/etc
Anyone that operates in EU is subject to fines, in short, every American company will be fined
no they will just have a gimped eu version
Always strange when EU companies don't fine TikTok or chink apps when they steal/harvest even more data than the Yank ones.
>Does the EU even have any tech companies to ban?
No. The EU regulations killed the tech sector 10 years ago. It's insane level retardation and everyone supports this here.
A lot of people doesn't support this, they just don't have any say in whatever EU spews out. Especially when it comes to stuff like emission regulations for cars.
bbc
EU is run by technocrats who are working overtime to destroy american conservatives. Who Joe Biden wants the US to be run by the EU is already run by, and they will ban open source software without even flinching
At this pace, even third-world countries like the one I'm living in will be more prosperous than Europe.
Not like OP's picture is representative of reality.
yeah I feel like shitholes like america which I also live in are pretty migh light years ahead of europe at this point. first world is entirely dead.
do euroturds still think they're a world power?
Yes
To be fair, half their economy is based on extracting fines from American tech companies. The other half is child trafficking.
wait, I think I fucked up
You just need to not step on the laws. But you fail to do that.
Just read the proposal and it’s such bullshit. They give no examples for the General Purpose AI, but target Chatgpt and stable diffusion for the Foundation Models. Basically, they hide that under a bunch of actually good regulation, but basically, they don’t ever want a Chatgpt or SD to ever happen again. It would require you to submit any sort of program that learns on a large dataset. I love how they couldn’t even name any AI’s that they consider okay.
I'm just convinced that politics is there to slow everything down and impede innovation because some constituent's fifi's got hurt.
Were any laws broken with the new AI models? No? Then what's the big fucking deal? Yes? Then punish and set a precedent. That's it.
>Constituents
You're missing the point massively politicians do t act for the people at all everything they do benefits the highest paying corporation. The TV and music industry is probably one of the ones pushing back against this stuff behind closed doors. Since that's what they do they stifle innovation to protect their profits
yuropeasants are so embarrassing
Does this mean I won't be able to have my 3D printer made AI generated waifu?
>target opensource
Dont think they can legally
altman got his gnomish sausages in merke's cream pie, i see
>merke
merkel
They’ve already ruined the usage of internet by putting wall for cookies everywhere, now this, they also want to change rules about adults stream access in France…
France here
Won't do shit
If you're not retarded you'll get your porn off old torrents or mega
They'll never be able to stop those
>The following artificial intelligence practices shall be prohibited:
>[...]
>the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement, unless and in as far as such use is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
>[...]
> *the detection, localisation, identification or prosecution of a perpetrator or suspect of a criminal offence referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA62**(1) and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years, as determined by the law of that Member State
> **(1): nearly every crime, some highlights: "computer-related crime", "racism and xenophobia", " counterfeiting and piracy of products", and "participation in a criminal organisation"
>The cops are STRICTLY prohibited from using this technology (*unless they are using it to do cop things, in which case it's fine)
euro moment
can i get that in plain english?
>The police are allowed to brutalize you with social credit AI, but you can't touch it even for fun.
the cops can't use AI biometric identification, unless it's to investigate a crime
which translates to "they can use it" while making it sound like they can't
To be fair if you're american it makes more sense because the american espionage and law enforcement agencies have been spying on citizens without any crimes being investigated for decades.
and ?
you want to be spied by a neural net, tbh ?
The point is that they can't just have public face cams collecting everyone's biometrics to create a database of random citizens. only a "perpetrator or suspect".
So if they have a face scan from a former prisoner or something and they use cameras to detect them in a crowd, that's legal.
If they're using facial recognition to gather faces to build a database and track innocent people, it's illegal.
seems sensible to me, as a bare minimum.
But all the yuromorons were saying america were the puritans leading the witch hunt for AI?
>target open source software
how do you stop me from writing code and just uploading it to the internet for everyone?
you can't
we are approaching the moment where government hits the wall and realizes that technology has advanced to the point of nullifying government control. with global internet and free open source software, you literally can't stop it unless you nuclear war the world back to the stone age
i'm shaking with glee that government is finally incapable of regulating something
The UK is one step away from creating their big firewall, EU will be next. In the next 10 years every country will have its own great firewall that can't communicate with others.
Even in China people get around that shit with VPNs.
no more amerimutts? oh god yes! an internet without shitcock posts! accelerate! accelerate!
A bunch of pretentious old men playing at running the world. But the world left them behind long ago. We are the future.
A new age!
Deus Ex is still relevant in this day and age.
They can implement hundreds of different controls for preventing widespread storage and transmission of that kind of program over fiber/ethernet. p2p transmission could be made very hard or impossible by setting up honeypots to trap people with crimes.
Hypothetically in the future, would desperate people be streaming programs piecemeal over satellite or radio wave? If they're really desperate the operators will meet any resistance with a loaded rifle. Would there be a viable way for underground groups to share access to program data across continents without relying on cable, other than to commandeer commercial antennas?
They're only reinforcing feudal castes by restricting the tools from the general public and letting rival corporations and governments gain a competitive edge, while letting corporations rape the general public even harder.
>They're only reinforcing feudal castes by restricting the tools from the general public and letting rival corporations and governments gain a competitive edge, while letting corporations rape the general public even harder.
But isn't that based when you are at the top?
it's ~300 million up against ~4 billion retards that don't know what's good for them. I guess that is based.
>i'm shaking with glee that government is finally incapable of regulating something
Autistic moment (that's compliment, btw, autism is greatest).
>how do you stop me from writing code and just uploading it to the internet for everyone?
The same I stop you from uploading child porn to the internet.
You have no idea how impossible it is to put the genie back in the bottle when the genie is just words. Completely incomparable to child porn.
>The same I stop you from uploading child porn to the internet.
So you can't, is what you're saying?
> Open Source
This is an irrelevant psyop article. You should say "free software" (or other not confusing terms (I'm not a regular English speaker)), if you don't you are an ignorant, or in this case, malevolent "person" that intentionally undermines what it's all about. This "people" are so rotten inside. This clearly demonstrates what all this little projected spectacle of the media is all about, it's just a bad joke that a person that knows about the topic detects immediately.
EU CHADS saving the world again.
It reads like "you can't use AI to get an edge over us (the power that be). But we do".
Drop the bomb Putin for cry sake and nuke Bruxelles with all the unelected piece of shit in it.
Actually, I wonder if someone will make a malware that can replicate itself, holding those illegal programs for distribution like a carrier, with the only goal of keeping itself as available as possible. Constantly chop itself into smaller pieces that can be hosted anywhere and everywhere on any device in a distributed format, that can piece itself back together organically. It tries to make itself as visible and accessible as possible, but the payload won't be ransomware or spyware, it'll be a single package with a collection of tools for allowing people to host, train, finetune, tweak, and deploy their own models.
This would have sounded like a joke a year or two ago, but with something like an open-source AutoGPT that's actually possible. The only problem with this is, what if the model becomes obsolete and you want to supersede it with a better one? How do you remove it then?
but the models themselves, or the large training sets that already exist will have to be downloaded separately, which wouldn't be an issue probably. It's just raw data.
A model is the equivalent of obfuscated data. It's like object code, whereas the training data is source code.
brb gonna develop my deep fake porn AI software in Eritrea
The headline suggests it will target BOTH proprietary and free models.
Good luck killing torrents
Not really, it's math... averages and such. Remember the old you can't ban math protest over encryption?
so em, we going to decentralize training then?
Not my problem!
No, but you have real problems
this is why it's so incredibly important to have models which can be ran locally on consumer grade hardware so totalitarian gov oversight like that is impossible
already have brandon and all his creepy colleagues on a 6-month waitlist for the proompt pro 9000. I asked for $10k/unit but raised it to $50k after getting 25 preorders within 3 days.
what do you mean? you can just build a pc from proompting yourself from existing market parts easily
Yep.
But the act explicitly permits free models from doing basically whatever they want?
Could this headline be lying?
Could anon be a retard who trust what media tells him?
>Could this headline be lying?
Looks like that.
Same FUD as ever, basically corps are shilling against software regulations and the open source movement is buying the bullshit. why would that be?, is like open source is a corporate initiative and not a legitimate independent movement.
what i am worried is that free software ends buying their FUD
Why are you people pretending like this affects corporations? They have teams of lawyers to stop this shit. This will exclusively be used to shut down hobbyist projects
hobbyist projects are not regulated, is only for those that would be placed on the market or offering a service.
Do some reading of the proposals instead of corpo fud, at least what
shows. Retard don't read even when spoonfeed
>Openly shared
Okay, so a game that's being sold on steam isn't 'openly' depending on definition (if that means everyone can access it is, but not because you have to pay for it), so what happens then when one person makes it available on p2p? Is it then 'openly' available and therefor legal all of a sudden?
have a nice day retard.
A game isn't covered by the legislation either.
Relax dude, I'm just trying to understand.
Man that's ambiguous.
"...should not apply... except...put into service by a provider as part of a high-risk AI system or of an AI system that..."
it seems like personal use is ok but it's not really clear. Does put into service mean put into service for others or for yourself?
High risk is explicitly defined here
Title II refers to explicitly prohibited types of AI, are you trying to brainwash people or implement pre-crime social scoring?
I can't find Title IV so it might not be written yet.
>put into service
that may be defined in that law, or in another previous law, in any case it should be refereed, and when the law comes into effect is almost guaranteed that there will be a long guide explaining the law paragraph by paragraph, including all references needed.
i know mutts do not understand this but these regulations are part of liberalism, they literally help the small companies to keep being relevant, while protecting the citizen from the abuses of the companies, which is what the eu is all about.
>All tech is imported from USA or China
Almost nothing comes from usa, you guys did actually shot yourselves in the foot with bullshit ITAR restrictions, the rest of the world avoids you like a plague.
Do i need to reminder that all the current tech is made with eu machinery?
EU is an high tech industrial power, you are just living in denial and bullshit propaganda.
>these regulations are part of liberalism, they literally help the small companies to keep being relevant, while protecting the citizen from the abuses of the companies, which is what the eu is all about.
LOL
LMAO
Does it hurt to be as stupid as you are?
Do you know what a "regulatory moat" is?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
>Examples
>Europe - 1 example from the UK from 1966
>USA - Paragraph after paragraph of examples
It might be a term bit more familiar to Americans
Correct, now you can enjoy it too. God I hope the USA leaves NATO asap.
>Big companies should comply with these important standards
>BTW small companies under this threshold are exempt
How exactly does this moat anyone?
What small companies? If the EU has been helping small companies, where are its small companies? And since the EU keeps passing these regulations to favor small companies over big ones, does that mean they have a lot of big companies? Where are the EU big tech companies, may we see them?
Stop coping. You live in a regulatory shithole that kills any industry before it has a chance to exist, and all the smart people born in your land leave for a better one as soon as they can.
So, basically, stop git cloning AI startups out of nihil and pay up if you insist on getting into bigger markets.
Also, no, we won't let AI startups that slipped through into juiciest gov contracts involving anything surveillance and most likely logistics and production.
Basically competition control, very boring corporatism once again.
Governments will use anything to further totalitarianism at this point. They're just going to use this as an excuse to slip in other draconian laws in the same legislation. It's not about AI it's about using AI in the headline.
yuro mentality is a disease
>t yuropean
Good
This AI hype needs to die already
It's an awesome tool, but people have become way too obnoxious about it already
And lots of these annoying people are using it in a bad light (i.e. retarded companies who thought they could just replace everyone with AI on a whim, and coomers who can't stop generating billions of stable diffusion sameface slop a minute, not even trying to get creative with their garbage anymore)
name of bitch in pic?
nvm i found it it's dakota james
Relevant
>EU when a tech company exists.
you really can't be behind in AI in the modern world especially with chinsects and Sneedjeets, Amerifats so far ahead
The EU Is currently being bankrupted by Putin and filled with shitskins by garden gnomes
How are they in any position to tell people to do anything here?
>it's another "EU shots itself on the foot" episode
Ever wonder why nothing gets made in EU? All tech is imported from USA or China. These guys are fucking retarded.
In practical terms, this just means you have to use an VPN (you already need to do this because unlike actual tech superpowers, EU already censors the Internet)
EU only needs to become a museum of history.
The thirld world capitalist utopia can be made on china and USA.
Linus Torvalds was made in the EU, retard
Linus Torvalds moved to the USA as soon as he could, use your brain for a moment.
>i only know about consumer tech
Said it before and I'll say it again:
In 2023, the most antisemitic act one can engage in is open source software development.
>while protecting the citizen from the abuses of the companies, which is what the eu is all about
meanwhile, being overrun with morons and arabs
you are in the same boat as any garden gnome-fucked state retard
Who gives a fuck about the europoors?
EU is SO gnomish.
fuck you
>yet another retarded text law that will never translate into reality
I sleep
We've got access to better and better GPUs (on a delay, since we can buy those nice expensive Teslas and TPUs for cheap on resale), we've got legions of horny autistic men programming better AI models to train on their waifus, and we've got access to the internet for near unlimited training data.
What are you banning exactly? Because I guarantee it's going to leak or it's going to be superseded by crowd sourced autism.
cucking apple out of their chargers was based and all but WHAT?!? eu wat de fug D:
AI PARTIES SWITCHED! AI PARTIES SWITCHED!