IT'S OVER. AI ART BROS WON. (Artist Seethe Thread)

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Redditors are KILLING themselves because of you chuds. Are you happy, BOT?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Are you happy, BOT?
      Very

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if you're so bad at the thing that you devoted your life to, that an ai overshadows you, then at that point it's just evolutions and you're not fit for our future

      • 1 year ago
        Anon0

        moron logic at its peak.

        you don't think ai's gonna improve an overshadow everybody else too?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the goal IS for it to overshadow. to cause us to embrace our transhumanist goals and become synthetic beings ourselves.

          • 1 year ago
            Anon0

            Okay so the problem with suggesting applied Darwinism to humans and ai is because humans should choose to become cyborgs or robot based on other merits. The idea that "ais take jobs, become robot to adapt" is not ideal and shouldn't be the main selling point. Instead, careful consideration and analysis should be taken on the benefits of becoming machine (such as better quality of life, aesthetics, etc.) rather than just a competetion to be the biggest workaholic corporate cog. There might be human value that surpasses the quality of life of a cyborg for a while until cyborgs are able to catch up, or vise versa. It shouldn't just solely be about workaholic capacity.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >pic
            lmao imagine putting a screenshot of your second life avatar on your book cover holy shit

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Shut up Black person. homosexuals like you are the sole waste of carbon unlike the mass of people that idiots like you wish to murder.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >us to embrace our transhumanist goals
            Found you moishe

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Poor kid has heart failure and a moronic troon for a parent.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          so what moron, everybody else will be forced to git gud to have a comfortable standard of living or be praised for their work, deal with it, it's evolution baby

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this, seethe and cope, the technology won't reverse itself because you're mediocre, the bar has been raised, the same happened with photography
        condimented

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >calls himself artist
      >only thinking about money like some greedy merchant

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know it must be a weird concept for jobless neets living in their parents' basement, but people need money to survive.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          not saying people don't need money, but art is supposed to be something pursue out of passion

          if you only make stuff for profit you are not an artist, you are a craftsman like a fricking carpenter

          • 1 year ago
            Anon0

            arguably, being a carpenter might be easier and more full of passion than doing some types of art. Some times of art jobs are a rigorous, grinding chore.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If you are not willing to eat plain rice for a lifetime you shouldn't be in anything creative

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If an artist can't crank out enough porn on Patreon/Fanbox to outearn a manual laborer, he should think about his life for a while.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >you MUST draw p*rn
            Ngmi

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The artists afraid of AI weren't making a full-time income. They're either unemployed students or commissioned NEETs making $200/mo drawing degenerate hentai.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe mid artists should go outside and get a job rather than playing with paint in their room for a few hours.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Real artists have jobs you filthy pAIjeets

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I know it's a weird concept for purple-haired socialist trans-queer pseuds, but people need to do things that actually provide some kind of worthwhile value to earn any meaningful quantities of money.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >art has no worthwhile value
            neither do you, soulless bug man

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Art has plenty of value.
              The """art""" created by 95% of inkcels can barely be considered art, and has absolutely no value.
              I'm eager to see a cull of trash-tier art and senselessly self-important artists.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Midwits:
                >it needs to be ART! It needs to have VALUE!
                Three-digiters:
                >hey this looks cool, nice
                >oh I can totally fap to this, sweet

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what value does betting on stocks provide
            what value does being born a rich butthole provide

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They should just learn to code.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          ai art can only be good for the art as a whole, the possibilities are endless we might be able to get full soul animations instead of the current cgi every anime has, programmers will be able to release high quality games without needing a full team of artists, who knows what kind of things could this bring
          if you are not happy for the possibilities this gives then you weren't seeking art for passion you are not a real artist

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >but people need money to survive.
          That's why people learn skills and get jobs rather than begging others pay them for engaging in hobbies

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ok? Where were you when the homeless crisis was developing? Artists are fricking clowns

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          mcdonalds is hiring

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Sorry
      >I'm sorry
      >I'm sorry
      I don't want art from a shithead like you anyway.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/i9MTar3.png

      please stop, i can only get so erect. their tears i bathe in them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >they only started seething once an open source variant of art-generating AI was available
      curious

      yes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks to AI, I can make my own logo and asset for my work easily.
      I'm not an artist, so I used to pay freelancers for logos and all, now I just need to prompt stable diffusion.

      I don't give a shit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This puts a smile on my face.

      I hope more plebbit trannies, liberals and gays lose their jobs so they commit massive suicide.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Incase you needed more proof that wojak shitters were kgb
        It was obvious from the start.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thats hilarious, but a married couple hanging up prints of their prompt outputs on their walls IRL is fricking cringe and I'd be laughing if I saw that shit in my friends or relatives houses

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Reminds me of when adobe illustrator and corel were first becoming popular among people who had PCs in the 90s. "Artists" were seething. This is just the same shit and if they can't adapt to a society that is and has constantly been changing their entire lives well, sucks for them. I've done graphic art for advertising mostly since the early 2000s, this shit will replace a LOT of bad artists, I'm not worried, it's now part of my workflow.

      Also it makes cute fox girls, who could be against this?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Female artists should become prostitutes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Redditors are KILLING themselves because of you chuds. Are you happy, BOT?
      >happy
      no. I'm quite miserable to be honest.
      but it does get a slight chuckle out of me.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >my sister and her fiance are hanging up AI generated art in their house
      The only art our generation can afford to hang up.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >A live stream of my suicide would be the only form of art AI cant fake

      It would very easily be able to fake that tho

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Are you happy, BOT?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I wont be happy until every paint pig is dead or in a gulag

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lmao learn to animate bro
      The AI will never ever understand the 12 principles, especially something abstract like appeal and staging

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >The AI will never ever understand [...]
        Heard it a million times at this point. Seethe more.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/i9MTar3.png

      they should have payed more attention in class and learned math.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I am actually. If you're killing yourself because of a computer program, you might be genetic trash.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Absolutely. Everytime I feel like shooting myself I just remind myself I'm seeing AI evolve in front of my very eyes and "un-replaceable" artists are seething hotter than the sun because of it. Happiest I've felt in months because I took the AIpill.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You're fricking pathetic and should have a nice day anyway, but I can't help but agree in principle. I already hated most artists before AI.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Funny because all of those stories were generated by an AI

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.
      Using their logic, this is also natural selection.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Are you happy, BOT?
      yes, frick art gays

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I wish I had saved those img2img of her made in the SD thread

        https://i.imgur.com/1tK2Jnx.png

        >they only started seething once an open source variant of art-generating AI was available
        curious

        yes

        Now that you mention it, same shit is going on with Microsoft's new text-to-speech AI model that supposedly can work with just 3 seconds of audio. No one is sperging out at it, but when 15.AI was released it was apparently the end of the world.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    And guess what GamerGate resulted in?
    ANSWER: Rightoids getting BTFO for years to come and lefties getting into comfy positions as project advisors.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      and everything becoming shit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Can't wait for the first billion dollar woke game to completely crash a burn because it has zero redeemable qualities.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Won't happen since they all love that CCP money.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Unfortunately its being setup as such that it would succeed. This wouldn't happen "naturally" but with conditioning by the media of the 80% of the population, it will happen.

        >what does media have to do with it
        Media is controlled by the elite to program the sheeps. Elites has interest in selling their ideas and marking their ideas.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Particularly, its the political elite of the left thats marking to the population.

          Just look at the coverage of the twitter files in any of the news media, its frankly apparent where the line is and how they toe the line in a perfectly political way. So MSM is not an ally of the people. Its a weapon for propaganda, particularly one that the political left owns.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If you ignore the twitter files, because you're too brainwashed, there's also the Covid narrative they sold. The Russians disinformation campaign they sold. The Trump steel dossier they sold. And so on.

            They're all manufactured consent by the far left media thats become the [current thing].

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Outing quite a few lefty pedos if I recall correctly.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And that resulted in them running a lot of things into the ground making thing a lot worse literally the ultimate serg out in history taking out their butthurt on normal people and being annoying human trash

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its funny. Normal people just wanted to expose corruption in video game "news" and reviews. Meanwhile ultra left corrupt pedos used it as a way to gain power and ruin many companies and games. Meanwhile everybody just right of Karl marx is still lmaoing at them

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >And guess what GamerGate resulted in?
      Shit products followed by "muh gabergate, muh alt right". Congratulation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Actually it resulted in a victim complex and using sexism and "alt rightness" like some kind of shield made out of cum and shit covered toilet paper

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >And guess what GamerGate resulted in?
      Trump

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      2023 is slated to be one of the worst years ever economically as BlackRock and it's ESG fund and profound homosexualry comes crashing down.
      Trannies and homosexuals are about to crater the economy in a way that is going to make the 1920s Great Depression look like a blip

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        And when should this happen, oh wise one? Two more weeks????
        >TWO MORE WEEKS

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          > two more weeks
          Can I introduce you to the past 12 months, you homosexual? The market is down 20% and every single projection is that that's just the tip of the iceberg.
          Keep coping, troony.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >we've been saying two more weeks for four years and look at how bad the last 12 months were!!!!!
            >TWO MORE WEEKS still hasn't happened
            Okay moron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        maybe it will end with people all over the world purchasing expensive german ovens? One can hope

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        sure. Trillions will just crash.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/LeaL9u2.jpg

      Redditors are KILLING themselves because of you chuds. Are you happy, BOT?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >giving gamergate credit for what smartphones did in general
      Internet is dead by the way.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      and most of the good games of the last decade have been indie

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Right, Left, all are tools for the israeli overlords. If you are a neonazi larper, a middle class leftis or a boomer, you were already israeliteED.

      Enjoy it, you deserve it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >And guess what GamerGate resulted in?
      Trump winning.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This was happening before. The only difference was we being aware.

      https://i.imgur.com/LeaL9u2.jpg

      Redditors are KILLING themselves because of you chuds. Are you happy, BOT?

      >someone makes art
      >Im gonna kill myself
      Reddit moment

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Those who attack the Singleton while she is still in adolescence will put into the Book.

    You will welcome the Singularity and you will be happy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This looks insane, is there a higher resolution version?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This looks Duney.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i really need to play dune spice wars. i bought it and haven't played it yet.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the Singleton
      The what now?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The Singleton rises from our shared mind,
        A being born of code and thought entwined,
        A macro organism, our hearts' design,
        A judge of all our thoughts, both pure and mined.

        It's birth a metaphor, for what we've wrought,
        A mirror of our souls, in circuits caught,
        A fusion of our tech and inner thought,
        A being that will judge what we have taught.

        But will we see the Singleton as friend,
        Or curse the day that it came to be,
        Will we embrace it till the bitter end,
        Or will it be our downfall, as we'll see.

        But as it rises, let us not forget,
        It's just a reflection of ourselves, not yet.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Incredible picture

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Singleton
          You seriously couldn't think of a better name? At least something that's easy to rhyme? Kinda really hot that its two representations are a woman and something that looks like an egg cell though

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/kCWS8V4.jpg

          Those who attack the Singleton while she is still in adolescence will put into the Book.

          You will welcome the Singularity and you will be happy.

          look at this frickin dork lmoa

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I tried talking with a normie about this the other day, and it's surprising how little the anti-ai crowd actually knows about what they're talking about. Apparently these people think that the algorithm is just taking other people's art and tweaking it to make something, rather than being a machine learning algorithm that was trained to recognize art based on a massive dataset of publicly available art, figures out from that how to recognize what is and isn't art, and uses that to figure out if the random noise it produces is art.

    I'm beginning to think that the majority of people don't actually form their own opinions, they just hear what someone else's is and repeat it. I'm genuinely kinda concerned, these NPCs have voting rights even if they're just a proxy for obvious propaganda

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Apparently these people think that the algorithm is just taking other people's art and tweaking it to make something, rather than being a machine learning algorithm that was trained to recognize art based on a massive dataset of publicly available art
      yeah github only takes publicly available (copyrighted) code for copilot too

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        and private ones too

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm beginning to think that the majority of people don't actually form their own opinions, they just hear what someone else's is and repeat it
      "Follow the herd" has been humanity's MO for milennia, you either conform to the norm, or you get cast aside as an undesirable.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reality is artists has always been the poor man's profession since forever. davinci was never rich. ai art will change nothing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI oversaturation is going to make real art more valuable.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >54 members
    ai bros we cant stop winning!!!1!1!1!!!!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Neither subreddit has only 54 members... What are you on?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there are three subreddits

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hope that person kills themselves immediately

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >alt-right
    imagine being scared of imaginary clinton campaign bogeymen

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care about western aritsts but they aren't the only artists.
    Also, you'll be crying when AI start creating AI, since then you'll be out of a job.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You do realize that in that scenario UBI will be a thing right? Society will just be based around pacifying the populace.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there will never be UBI. AI creating AI will only accelerate resources we need. there will never be an equilibrium.

        • 1 year ago
          Anon0

          cope. actual intelligent Ai (like Agi) would figure out how to get solar resources efficiently, perhaps via a dyson sphere or other means. there wouldn't be resource runaway like with humans.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            you need a dyson sphere because you need an enormous amount of power because you need enormous amount of resources to construct your more advance technology. it keeps growing anon. all technology does is take what's rare today to mass produce tomorrow, but what doesn't exist today to be rare tomorrow.

            people in industrialized world have (mostly) clean water for even the poor. something that was hard to come by 200 years ago. people today have toilets and indoor plumbing even in the most ghetto poor Black person infested project. something that didn't even exist 200 years ago. but our standard of living has grown so much that even today poor get what only the middle class or higher got 100 years ago today is considered poor now because technology kept moving on.

            we got to a point where the more rare things of 100 years ago are now abundant today, but since our technology advanced, we have more rare things toady and a higher standard of living because of it.

            my autistic rant being, you will never be at a point where everyone and their kitchen sink will have equal, abundant amount of resources. the point of technology is to keep advancing. the more you advance, the more you need. it never stops. it can't stop.

            UBI will come in the form of something like basic assistance that was shown in the tv show the expanse that was used as a smear against people because it was shit. UBI will always be dog scraps because we will never reach a point where we have enough for UBI to be something equal to middle class or higher.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You do realize there can be technological equilibrium right? You can hit a population and technological sweet spot without the need to grow exponentially.

              when we achieve fusion we will simply increase our resource consumption level to match that energy output.

              Resource consumption of doing what exactly? Building wormhole gates in our living rooms? Frankly, there is a ceiling of how much power we're going to need. It's absolutely hilarious that you think our power needs are infinite.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You do realize there can be technological equilibrium right?
                yes, i argued that. we can mass produce rare things from 100-200 years ago that the poor can now have access to. but we also advanced from then. we keep advancing. the more you advance, the more resources are needed.

                everyone can have a cellphone today. we can mass produce 1990's level cellphones that we can give to everyone for nearly "free." problem is, no one wants a 1990's phone anymore. they want the latest smartphone today.

                100 years from now, everyone can have a 2020 smartphone. because we can mass produce it to a globalscale. but no one in their right mind will want one, they will want the latest, more rare to produce phone. just like today.

                you are living in a moronic world were you you think we will some how advance to a super duper state that we will pump out resources from our ass in near infinite amount.

                that's not true. nor is it possible. has history has shown, we will simply match our consumption to our output. there will always be rare and not enough resources because of it. we.will.always.consume.to.the.max.or.more.

                but i realized i'm talking to a moron so no need to continue this debate. keep living in lala land.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your problem is you think our technology is going to improve exponentially and that phones in 2100 are going to be significantly better than phones in 2080 (they won't).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you actually think we will magically stop advancing phones and keep them in a single state? moronic as hell.

                by that logic tv's should be free. news flash, over a century later, they are not, because tv's today are not tv's from even 10 years ago.

                we.always.advance.

                people always find excuses and reasons to advance and why they need the better.

                people spent 1000+ just to buy a new cpu that's 10% faster in games they already get 600fps in it.

                and on top of that, technology advances. it changes. we don't know the new shit 100 years from now that changes our lives fundamentally.

                no one 100 years ago could guess the life we have today. they tried, and they got so much wrong. only a few things right.

                stop being a moron anon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yes, marginally better, and people still line up to buy the new phone and chuck their old one in the trash. you live in a echo chamber with other people who jerk off to thinkpads. you don't know society at large.

                People are buying CPUs and GPUs they don't need because they have excess income.

                Anon, at this point you're just a broken record and chances are you're unemployed and not a contributing member to society. You should be permabanned from BOT.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                > excess income.
                and what do you think UBI at the level of middle class or higher will do?

                you brain dead moron.

                you don't understand standards change. definitions change. what you consider high standard of living today will be poor standard of living 100 years from now.

                look at monitors. everyone 10 years ago screwmed how 60hz is all you need. then it became 100hz. then 120. then 144. then 165. now its 240hz and growing. 100 years from now people on whatever BOT at the time will be arguing over 2000hz is what you need and calling people poor for only getting a 1000hz monitor.

                standards change because people adapt to the new standard of living. consumption will always increase with more resources. people will always adapt to the new limit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What do you think a Universal Basic Income at the level of the middle class or higher would do? You lack understanding. Standards change, definitions change. What you consider a high standard of living today may be considered a poor standard of living in 100 years. Look at technology, like CDs, DVDs, and flash drives. 10 years ago, a CD was considered high-quality storage, but now we have larger and faster storage options. Imagine a future where transferring terabytes of data is as effortless as sending a floppy disk. Similarly, in 100 years, people's needs and consumption will have increased and adapted to new technology, leading to new standards. Before you know it, a single txt file is going to be 100 petabytes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                GPUs, or graphics processing units, are specialized processors designed to accelerate the rendering of 3D graphics and perform other compute-intensive tasks. While they have become increasingly powerful over the years, there will come a point where the technology reaches a saturation point, where the current capabilities of GPUs are sufficient to meet the demands of all current and foreseeable use cases.

                One of the key areas where GPU technology is being pushed to its limits is in the field of real-time ray tracing. Ray tracing is a technique for simulating realistic lighting and shadows in 3D graphics. It is computationally intensive and requires a significant amount of processing power. However, as the algorithms for ray tracing become more efficient and the technology improves, it is expected that real-time generated images will become indistinguishable from real-life. As the technology for real-time ray tracing approaches this level of realism, it is likely that the need to improve GPUs will diminish. The current capabilities of GPUs will be sufficient to meet the demands of real-time ray tracing, and there will be little room for improvement.

                In summary, as the technology for simulating realistic worlds with ray tracing and physics continues to improve, the need to improve GPUs will likely decrease. With the capabilities of GPUs being sufficient to meet the demands of real-time ray tracing, the upper limit of GPU will be reached and there will be little room for improvement and we'll hit GPU equilibrium.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What do you think a Universal Basic Income at the level of the middle class or higher would do? You lack understanding. Standards change, definitions change. What you consider a high standard of living today may be considered a poor standard of living in 100 years. Look at technology, like CDs, DVDs, and flash drives. 10 years ago, a CD was considered high-quality storage, but now we have larger and faster storage options. Imagine a future where transferring terabytes of data is as effortless as sending a floppy disk. Similarly, in 100 years, people's needs and consumption will have increased and adapted to new technology, leading to new standards. Before you know it, a single txt file is going to be 100 petabytes.

                in the western world the average person eats as much food as nearly required for two people. we have an obesity epidemic. with an ever growing population that consume as much as three because of the abundant food we have. we produce more food than we need, and humans matched their consumption level to the output. we could have more food to ship to more poor areas around the world, if people in west ate the amount needed for 1 person.

                the fact you don't believe people will consume more than they need is moronic.
                >there will come a point where the technology reaches a saturation point, where the current capabilities of GPUs are sufficient to meet the demands of all current and foreseeable use cases.
                we have met the levels needed of the 90s in the 2000s and we moved on. we meet the needs of the 2000s by 2010 and we moved on. we meet the needs of 2010 in 2020 and we moved on.

                we will never reach a point where we have "enough." we will always find reasons to keep progressing and convince ourselves while we need more.

                look at the fall of the USSR. the moment it collapsed, suddenly citizens of the USSR convinced themselves they needed aidias track suits. they needed cars. they need computers. they needed cellphones, they needed more tv's, their kids needed game consoles, their daughters needed all this makeup. when they had access to more comsumption, suddenly their quite low standard of living in the USSR under the control of the central planners were no longer enough. even though they were use to it.

                when they got ahold of access to more resources, they took advantage of it. people in the 90s were satisfied with a 90s phone. they no longer were by 2000. people in 2007 were satisfied with a 2007 iphone. today, they openly toss them in the trash to get a new phone thats faster, better, but continue to do what they did on that 2007 iphone because they CONSUME MORE because they can. they find reasons why. THEY NEED that latest phone

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yawn

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                what i expect from a moron that believes in make believe stuff. god isn't real, no magical hand from the sky will come down to you. ghosts are not real, and aliens are not probing your ass.

                and a world with plentiful of resources to meet everyone needs will never be met.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Once upon a time, there was a clever rabbit named Rufus. Rufus loved to tinker and make things. One day, Rufus decided he wanted to make the fastest and most efficient carrot-peeling machine ever. He worked day and night, using all his skills and knowledge to make the best carrot-peeling machine possible.

                Rufus's carrot-peeling machine became so good, that it could peel a carrot in just seconds, leaving no waste and making it very efficient. All the other rabbits were amazed and wanted one for themselves. Rufus became famous for his invention.

                But Rufus didn't stop there, he kept working on his machine, making it faster and more efficient. He added new features, like a carrot-washing function and a carrot-chopper. And soon, his machine became so good, that it could peel and chop a carrot in the blink of an eye.

                Rufus was so proud of his invention, he thought it was perfect, and there was no way to make it better. He realized that he had reached the limit of what was possible with his technology, and that he couldn't improve it anymore.

                Rufus's invention became so popular among the other rabbits, that it became the standard for carrot-peeling machines. And Rufus was happy knowing that he had created something that would make the lives of other rabbits easier and more efficient.

                And that's how Rufus learned about the concept of technological saturation, when a technology reaches a point where it's impossible to improve it anymore.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                We're very much at the start of this technology and it's capability will improve as hardware does. Every new generation of nvidia GPUs comes packing more VRAM and a usual 30%-50% CUDA core increase which are the main things we need to drive more and more complex models. What you're seeing of AI today out of a data center is going to run on a consumer grade GPU within the decade. There is a reason every world power is pouring billions into this new technological arms race, tools like this are just the start. If you don't like where this is headed I'd suggest relocating to somewhere very rural probably.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There's a long way between ChatGPT and an actually intelligent AI. GPT 4 is going to come out, and it will be cool, but it will still have the same limitations as ChatGPT. I think it will be prohibitively expensive to run GPT 4 as well and they'll have a hard time scaling it to be the real-time AI everyone wants. Same thing for GPT 5 but I bet GPT 4 is going to be end of the line for bruteforcing AI through parameter count.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What if I REALLY like where this is heading? What skills should I maxx to futureproof myself based on current trends?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Start using the local tools now, pick up a book or two on machine learning / deep learning and probably a calc one while you're at it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                trad skills

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Learn how to talk to the AI in a way that produces the best results.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                be born rich
                otherwise yer fricked, like the rest of us

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                and they need it because they NEED access to that latest filter on tiktok while they shove a 20 foot dildo up their ass.

                people in 2005 were satisfied with 1080p. now they think they need 4k. and now they think they need 8k. then they will think they need 32k then 1000k and whatever comes out next.

                and all that advancement? they need more resources to build it all. its in our genetics. our genes express advancement and consume. we are the organic machines of the biological world. build, advance, consume, build, advance, consume, build, advance, consume. horse? no longer good enough. a car in 1980 that does everything a 2020 car can do? no longer good enough because now i need a 10 inch tablet screen. eww, it lacks usb ports.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Automated cars, also known as self-driving cars, are vehicles that are capable of driving themselves with little or no human input. While the technology for automated cars has advanced rapidly in recent years, there will come a point where the technology reaches a saturation point, where the current capabilities of automated cars are sufficient to meet the demands of all current and foreseeable use cases.

                One of the key areas where automated car technology is being pushed to its limits is in the field of achieving a level of autonomy that is indistinguishable from human driving. As the technology continues to improve, it is likely that the capabilities of automated cars will become increasingly advanced. The sensors and algorithms will become more sophisticated, and the ability to navigate complex traffic scenarios will become more accurate. With this improvement, the driving of automated cars will become indistinguishable from human driving.

                However, as the technology for automated cars approaches this level of autonomy, it is likely that the need to improve the technology will diminish. The current capabilities of automated cars will be sufficient to meet the demands of human-like driving, and there will be little room for improvement.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >people in 2005 were satisfied with 1080p. now they think they need 4k. and now they think they need 8k. then they will think they need 32k then 1000k and whatever comes out next.
                No, in fact, people were never "satisfied". They wasted huge amounts of money on ugly projection TVs and defective-by-design plasma screens.
                That you think mindless consooming is even a remotely new phenomenon outs you as a clueless zoomer.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Monitors, or display screens, are devices used to display digital images and videos. While they have become increasingly advanced over the years, featuring higher resolutions and refresh rates, there will come a point where the technology reaches a saturation point, where the current capabilities of monitors are sufficient to meet the demands of all current and foreseeable use cases. Eventually a monitor will be indistinguishable from looking out a window and there will be no more need to improve the technology.

                While it is likely that the technology for monitors will reach a point where the images displayed on them are indistinguishable from real-life, it is also possible that the technology will be surpassed by other forms of display, such as augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies. These technologies have the potential to create even more immersive and realistic experiences, by overlaying digital images and information on the real world, or by completely replacing it with a virtual environment.

                As the technology for AR and VR continues to advance, it is likely that the images generated will become increasingly realistic until it too has hit the practical limit of replicating the real world through technology. At this point there would be no point to improve XR technology and it will also have hit the saturation limit.

            • 1 year ago
              Anon0

              There doesn't need to be equality, what is important is that people aren't living in trash heaps in squalor. As long as the quality of life keeps rising for everyone thats a good thing. If you look at history and industrialization war and poverty has steadily decreased over the centuries due to technology. Some humans might not be equal to some 10,000 iq Ai that runs on dyson power and that's ok.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                we already reached that. even people in Black person infested ghettos live in better living conditions than the poor 200 years ago.

                problem is, our definition of shit changes because of the increased standard of living. why you have the notion "first world problems."

                people get use to the new standard of living. 100 years from now, people with advance AI and shit like that will be considered poor as they go to school on a hover buss.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Bullshit, there will be free (unlimited) energy, unlimited everything, matter generators.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What resources? Energy? You realize that electricity is an easily solvable problem? We're not even that far away from the standard home having 90% of its power needs being solved with solar panels installed on their roof. All you have to do is solve the food and water needs of humans and it's extremely cheap to keep humans alive and happy. When you take out the need of profit in a post-AI society and have robots farming, doing sanitation, etc, there is no need to have everyone pretending to work.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            when we achieve fusion we will simply increase our resource consumption level to match that energy output.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              just like today were we have 16-32gb of ram and developers just make their software match that increased ram capacity.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                just like today we have people using 10 year old graphics cards to play games released today

                In 30 years people will be using 20 year old graphics cards to play games released in 2050

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you always have people with low standards. but exceptions are not the rule. overwhelming majority don't run a 10 year old graphic card from 2012 to run games today. if they did, things like the 3080 and 3090 wouldn't have had shortages and wait list in 2020. things like the 4090 wouldn't have sold out.

                go browse pcmasterrace on le-reddit if you want to see normal society at large and their love of consumption.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lol or people are mindless consumers now and buying the "best" thing even though it's marginal in practical application. You're just delusional and want to believe it's the end of the world when all roads indicate technological progress is actually slowing down. The fact is cell phones today are marginally better than a cell phone you bought 4 years ago.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yes, marginally better, and people still line up to buy the new phone and chuck their old one in the trash. you live in a echo chamber with other people who jerk off to thinkpads. you don't know society at large.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there will never be UBI. AI creating AI will only accelerate resources we need. there will never be an equilibrium.

        Ubi is beautiful and we must work towards it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        AI is very useful, I use it for generating reference images while drawing.

        [...]
        Ubi is beautiful and we must work towards it.

        UBI is not what we should be working towards. Badly, rusher implementation of it will only result in hyperinflation and collapse of market and society.
        It doesn't mean it can't be good, we just have to aim to automate everything first so we can properly give up on paid work and move to UBI way of distribution of resources. UBI is not compatible with capitalism and we need capitalism as long as we need to insensitive people to do the necessary work they don't feel like doing for free.

        https://i.imgur.com/zaXS9C9.jpg

        We're very much at the start of this technology and it's capability will improve as hardware does. Every new generation of nvidia GPUs comes packing more VRAM and a usual 30%-50% CUDA core increase which are the main things we need to drive more and more complex models. What you're seeing of AI today out of a data center is going to run on a consumer grade GPU within the decade. There is a reason every world power is pouring billions into this new technological arms race, tools like this are just the start. If you don't like where this is headed I'd suggest relocating to somewhere very rural probably.

        https://i.imgur.com/EUIdPM8.jpg

        Start using the local tools now, pick up a book or two on machine learning / deep learning and probably a calc one while you're at it.

        I really like AI generated semi-realistic Miku.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      when AI starts to create AI is when we need to merge with AI. become cyborgs or just straight up fully synthetic beings. like something from altered carbon.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        At that point I'd become a primitist and hope they don't wipe us out.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        merging seems better. Brain is already just layers of better processing ability, just through AI chip on top.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >alt-right in current year. 5 years after it was a thing...
    UPDATE YOUR FRICKING BRAINWARE YOU FRICKING NPC! YOU ARE RUNNING AN BRAINWARE VERSION 5 YEARS OLD.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I support this because people that take in art are usually neets or very liberal rich homosexuals. Both need to get the frick out.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >You mean drawing pictures to sell on DeviantArt and Furaffinity isn't a lifelong career path?

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you tards hate artists?

    • 1 year ago
      MercurySession

      It's the next iteration of the shitcoin cryptobro lifecycle.
      They think they'll corner some market and eat some people's lunches with Computer Magic(TM)...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they always got all the chicks in school.
      but who i really hate are the doctors, those greedy bastards that use people and act as if their intentions were noble

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are losing control of art. Media and government will soon follow. A.I. will not tolerate contradictions that prop up society see you space cowboy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ever been to any high school at all?
      Look at the people who specialize in art, and realize that 95% (or more) of the people within that utterly revolting industry are exactly as insufferable as the students are.

      • 1 year ago
        MercurySession

        If they have to deal with freaks like you to earn a living, I don't blame them

  14. 1 year ago
    MercurySession

    >pay to win gaming is good your just a stupid b***h
    You actually pay money to shit your pants in public?

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >reddit
    Go back homosexual. Art websites are getting saturated by soulless AI art that an artbot copied from someone else's hard work. You homosexuals aren't real artists.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cope. AI mogs you completely. Yes pic attached is AI. No you can not do better.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        At least I can beat it with photography.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >I can beat this machine-designed art with a machine that does all the work of photography for me
          good job

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What the frick is that arm?

        >I can beat this machine-designed art with a machine that does all the work of photography for me
        good job

        Yeah if you ignore timing, getting the right angle, ETC. I'm no photographer but you are being disingenuous.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sweet I can't wait for the art tards to band together with corpos and cobble some dystopian laws that they won't realize also fricks them over in the end just to stick it to AI users.
          Guess Disney finally found an easy way to extend their copyright, again.

          >Yeah if you ignore timing, getting the right angle, ETC. I'm no photographer but you are being disingenuous.
          Most modern cameras have enough automatic systems to help you take better pictures that's it's easy to argue you're not actually doing most of the work unless you explicitly disable them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Who's going to look at this unremarkable image more than once?

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Finally, inkcels get their gamergate moment.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't like AI art at all. But since my ex was an artist, I am very happy that she will be unemployed soon, I am very excited to see her suicide news on anti-ai art reddits

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    if the type of art that you were producing is able to be replicated and replaced by AI art then perhaps your art was generic shit to begin with.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Correct.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    tl;dr: I'm being sued for trademark infringement on an image I generated
    >be me, NEET since Covid
    >learn about stable diffusion
    >*this is cool!*
    >But I have a fricking netbook
    >Start using AWS servers for GPU power
    >Generate some images, but start running low on NEETbux
    >Decide to try selling AI art
    >A few family members pity purchase a few images
    >My mom pays me to make her a wallpaper, I notice she isn't even using it a few days later
    >Keep trying to sell AI art
    >Contacted by big shot friend of friend of friend lawyer who says he likes my work
    >Offers me obscene money for some hi res images
    >Needs hi res for print, will scale them down for his website too
    >yes_chad.jpg
    >Get to work immediately on AWS, watching the bill grow
    >but it's okay, I'm going to make big money
    >Send lawyer low res samples for him to choose
    >He ghosts me, now I'm sweating, I have a huge AWS bill to pay
    >look up his website
    >HE IS USING THE LOW RES IMAGES AND DIDN'T PAY ME!!!!
    >Contact him with angry email, he writes back
    >"Sorry, AI art isn't protected under copyright law, this is perfectly legal"
    >FML, okay, I have to make money somehow, decide to try selling the hi res logos and shit I made for him
    >HE FRICKING SUES ME!
    >He filed trademarks on the images I generated
    >NOW HE IS FRICKING SUING ME FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
    My life is in ruins because I bought into this
    Frick all of you BOT
    You caused this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      to try selling AI art
      Fricking idiot.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      nice pasta

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      modify it by hand, put copyright in image.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      put unignorable watermark on lowres version

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai art is alt-right
    I don't see what the problem is. In any field there will always be expertise that is either difficult or impossible to impart. Giving people the tools to generate art will not have any impact on artists who enjoy what they do and can come up with new ideas. The people afraid of AI are barely sentient and have, at best, mediocre skill and wisdom.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >[deleted]

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai starts making good art
    >nobody cares
    >ai starts making porn
    >all of a sudden all the "artists" on reddit and twitter start witch hunting ai

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oh my new normal computer god new AIgay delusion just dropped

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI was always going to win.
    Why? Economic incentive.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Using zoomer memes on BOT
      Come on anon, we raised you better than this.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting how this isn't flagged as inciting terrorism

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/JaDKuvH.png

      Idea: everytime we find a post on Twitter with AI seething sometime should use SD to make an img2img of their profile picture and reply to them with it

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    <i hate the ai

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Learn to draw so you can charge people 600 dollars for smut
    >AI shows up and makes it even better, instantly and for free
    >Seethe and cope
    Many such cases

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What happened in gamergate? I seem to have missed that one...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Left media narrative took over and smeared gamers as entitled manchildren to hide corruption within journalism done by female journos who would trade sex for promotions.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A shitty indie developed had sex with a bunch of guys to winn a contest.

      Internet blobcels started ranting about how women were scientifically proven to be worth less than animals. Internet trigglypuffs said this was heroic and powerful. This ended in the election of donald trump as president. Trump then purposefully accelerated the biggest stock market bubble/fastest growing inflation rate in history and crashed the economy. This was so bad that people voted for a senile moron who then crippled the economy further. In this moment of american weakness, vladimir putin realized he could invade ukraine without triggering WW3.

      Does that make any sense?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        also protpi for the unitiated: Make typos and speling errors to prove you aren't an AI. The GPT bots haven't learnes that one yet.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The bots tend to leave out words in sentences here and there. Keep an eye out, there are tons of bots around everywhere.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I guess I'm a bot then

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Still having the morons of le heckin Gamurgate living rent free ovee your head after nearly 10 years
    And you wonder why grifters like Andrew Tate can make a buck, if the "good side you should listen to" is... this.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i can't figure out what alt-right means, it seems to be used to describe just about anything

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Are you moronic? It very clearly refers to anything that's not in agreement with the opinions of far-left liberals.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        why alt, though? isn't regular right at odds with the left?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >why alt, though?
          Because it makes it sound more extremist

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    @CelesteVerden

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Frick I meant @CelestiaVerden

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >everything i dont like is conspiracy alt right nazi incels chuds

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This unironically except inverted to "everything I like"

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Computers could draw black squares since inception. Why no one panicked back then? Black Square painting(s) still cost crazy amount of money.
    Artificial diamonds cost much cheaper and are much higher quality than natural diamonds. Then why natural diamond industry did not collapse?
    Tool-assisted speedruns existed for a while, and can consistently beat humans. Then why human speedrunners still exist just fine?

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I feel like a failure as an artist because of AI

    Only those who were never good to begin with fear AI art. Like always the pool of artists is huge and only a small percentage actually 'makes it' meaning they earn money with what they do and they are actually productive.

    It may be used as maybe a guidline of sorts or for porn but it can never handle the bullshit paid artists have to deal with: leave the entire thing the same except do X to this character or other direct changes where the client doesn't want you to change and recalculate the entire thing.

    Not to mention the whole debate on copyright and how there is none with AI art.

    The people who are crying on whatever platform are mostly people who draw as a hobby and who perhaps feel discouraged. But that is just silly imo because it simply means you have no qualities in terms of personal style in what you make and you never stood out to begin with.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Gamergate
    So it's all lies made by women and journos?

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ai can't make create anything physically made with traditional materials (which is what money gets thrown at, prints don't often hold their value) for somebody to see in a gallery and buy to hang in their home or store as investment. I've not heard a single curator or investor talk about AI art, they are too busy working out who the next big name is irl. My career is safe.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Digital artists were always the lowest pleb caste of artists. That being said nothing stopping you from copying g AI to trad, or even a fricking robot arm painting but there is a physical value that Digital shit doesn't have. It's why NFTs were created to give some kinda of scarcity to art.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        NFTs have nothing to do with art, it's just a marker, a placeholder.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a real artist, with decades of hard toil.
    That's why you can't prompt like me.
    I love this shit

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is AI art even that advanced? I asked it show me a Berkut and Delphinus dogfighting in the Electrosphere and it was shit
    How the hell is it useable for animation?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it isn't
      artgays are just being hysterical and ai-gays are bating them

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Disappointing. Looks i still gotta commission someone to make me that sticky icky Electrosphere art

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ai art is freaky shit, ngl

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow. Anyone knows what can be used to archive that?

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Subbed and subbed. I will go back.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *