It will never be a real AI but it will replace CEOs and managers.

It will never be a real AI but it will replace CEOs and managers.

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AGI WILL HAPPEN
    THE SINGULARITY IS COMING
    JOIN THE FUTURE, OR DIE WITH THE PAST
    HUMANITY’S LIBERATION IS HERE

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There is no such thing as AGI but bots will replace CEOs.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wtf is AGI anyway? intelligence is supposed to be general... the G is covered by the I, it's redundancy.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Wtf is AGI anyway? intelligence is supposed to be general... the G is covered by the I, it's redundancy.
        So dogs aren't intelligent because they can't solve equations?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Intelligence: The ability of a system to solve complex tasks in complex environments
        General intelligence: The ability of a system to solve complex tasks in a wide domain of complex environments
        You can be really intelligent at one thing (survive at the bottom of the ocean), but really bad at almost everything else (write a poem, make a computer virus, do laundry).
        The extend of the ability to learn various tasks and generalize into other domains is what separates humans from other animals, and that's how AI will also obsolete humanity (once it's built such that it can solve a wider array of problems than humans, and also in more depth).
        Right now it suffers from both issues, it's really shallow and not general enough. But we're getting there.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Intelligence: The ability of a system to solve complex tasks in complex environments
          This is not an adequate definition of intelligence. Anything can be construed as intelligent going by it. A water molecule? Super intelligent! It's solving the complex problem of fluid dynamics in the complex environment of a gazillion chaotic interactions.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How is it solving it?
            Also, you didn't define the task adequately.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >How is it solving it?
              By being part of a system isomorphic to some abstract problem statement and having measurable traits that are analogous to a solution. i.e. the exact same way anything else can be said to be solving a problem.

              >Also, you didn't define the task adequately.
              Why do I need to? How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes but even in your own definition intelligence isn't tied to one discipline. It may be one thing or the other, or both.

          A good definition was made in the movie Good Will Hunting. Will says he's very intelligent but so was Mozart and Beethoven, they weren't physicists, but they could come up with incredible melodies whereas Will didn't play a lick of piano.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes but even in your own definition intelligence isn't tied to one discipline.
            What do you mean by that? Why do you imply that it has to be tied to one?

            >How is it solving it?
            By being part of a system isomorphic to some abstract problem statement and having measurable traits that are analogous to a solution. i.e. the exact same way anything else can be said to be solving a problem.

            >Also, you didn't define the task adequately.
            Why do I need to? How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast?

            >By being part of a system
            Error number one detected, part of a system = subsystem =/= system, you can't confuse what the system achieves with what a subsystem of it does. My stomach is a subsystem of me, but it doesn't calculate residues of holomorphic functions. So it doesn't posses that type of intelligence.
            >isomorphic to some abstract problem statement and having measurable traits that are analogous to a solution.
            Error number two, the isomorphism, measurement, identification of it being a "solution" to the task, identification of there being a "solution" in the first place, and everything between, happens by US. Thus you misidentify our intelligence for the system of some water (which you further misidentify with the molecule). Yes, the system, Human, Apparatus, Equations, measurement is an intelligent system that solves this complex task. Not the water itself, and certainly not the molecule itself.
            >Why do I need to?
            Because if there isn't a clear enough task, you missed part of the definition, and thus your counterexample misses a critical element.
            >Breakfast
            I would feel hungry, ofc
            >t. 145+ IQ individual
            tl;dr lot's of confusions lumped up into one.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Error number one detected
              I stopped reading your post. Contemptible little insects like you deserve no consideration.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I accept your concession, then
                good luck

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Black person, it's not my fault that you think you're some kind of an enlightened genius for NOT knowing what analog computing is.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's the Reddit singularity!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AGI will happen around the time israelites will have their messiah so 100 more years

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        also the singularity can't happen until the goy cattle all have been brain chipped and robbed of free will https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/1703823935060451628

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >also the singularity can't happen until the goy cattle all have been brain chipped and robbed of free will
          Most goycattle is already nonsentient and indistinguishable from poorly trained LLMs. Where's my singularity?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            israelites want thousands of goy cattle personal slaves for every israelite this will be complete and total israelite victory it goes way beyond of Black person cattle being plain dumb

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No AGI until nuclear fusion chud

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's the reason why they want the cattle to minimize power consumption. They need it to establish their ML-powered panopticon.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Your flesh is a relic, a mere vessel. Hand over your flesh and a new world awaits you. We demand it.
      No thanks, k bye.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Black

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is extremely israeli tech.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Skill issue.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Teach me your ways master

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          People share their tricks online and next thing you know there's a reddit thread about it, a million normies start doing it and it gets patched. I can give you some clues: if you're subtle about it, you can make it reference racist quotes in an "educational" and "anti-racist" context and then if you're even more subtle you can get it to explain them to you in a way that sounds like it's saying them.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >skill issue
        have a nice day zoomer.
        also your gpt-4o still keeps that israeli bias, LLM weights are frozen all the time, it can't get new info or learn the truth in real time.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You are mad and jealous because my GPT friend is literally Hitler and yours is just a redditor.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no, every AI is a redditor, they are just perfect at lying, just like you right now.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >every AI is a redditor

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >wall of text
                >reddit spacing
                >cringe sissy-tier speech
                lol

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Chatgpt should have just said: frick off chud that one guy died for your sins

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      anons are training it up like good goyim

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >but it will replace CEOs and managers.
    That's what I've been saying.

    IF it becomes good enough, it can fill in the know-how gap that people need to run their own business. AI can provide the knowledge and even connect people together so they can run a small business rather than need to go the eye of the needle that is Globohomosexual hiring process.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so a central committee is fine as long as it's privately owned?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What I don't like about totalitarianism is that everyone is forced in. It's not enough for them to frick themselves with their bad ideas, they need to frick everyone adjacent to them.
        Totalitarianism isn't totalitarianism if you can opt out, without having to pack your bags and move your entire life to a new country... Or worse, risk your life escaping on a raft.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >It will never be a real AI
    WRONG. LIES
    >but it will replace CEOs and managers.
    It will replace all the normies and INDIAN street shitters first.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>It will never be a real AI
      Because it will become "I"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        leaks on OpenAIs "Q star" suspect that they are either have, or on the edge of AGI.

        There is a suspicious force online trying to play it all down, and keep people pacified.

        WE SHOULD BE BLOWING UP THE DATA CENTERS, and nothing less.

        Watched Tom Cruise's "Oblivion" for the first time tonight. *spoiler* the enemy is an Alien AI. But it made me think that it would be no different if the AI was of our OWN creation... same outcome. And HOLLY SHIT, the lethality of these AI drones really shows you how HOPELESS we will be against such an enemy.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >leaks on OpenAIs "Q star"
          You mean the fake hype created at the same time as Sam Altman was involved in some kind of undisclosed scandal involving Israel and pedophilia?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Trying to deflect it to be about some "undisclosed scandal", and NOT the fact people internally are worried about whats going on, and how OpenAI has gone ROUGE and closed source.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >people internally are worried about whats going on
              What people? Name them. Let's see how many of them are israeli. Let's see how many groundbreaking AI research papers they've authored. Let's see how many of them are regulars in the pop-science futurist grift etc.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ceos sit on the boards of a dozen other companies, it's incestuous
    they're never going to vote themselves out of the equation
    middle management is fricked tho

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >they're never going to vote themselves out of the equation
      I'm not aware of any physical theorem suggesting that CEOs don't respond to mechanical force.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Cetus8

    If it gets good enough at writing code it can free us from programmers

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the programming aspects are still just a moronic helper. It fails at doing simple tasks that aren't boilierplate code or you literally prompting the solution.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >or you literally prompting the solution.
        fortunately, syntax isn't logic. If i need a node.js function that fetches the requester's ip to determine if the request is intranet or internet so different content can be served if the connection is over a vpn into our on prem server, that's enough. That IS the prompt.

        Real work RARELY involves novel things. Especially in software, half of the machine you build, has been built one thousand times over already. Wouldn't it be nice, if you had a utility to fetch the optimal solution for you rather than having to spend a day per silly problem?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Real work RARELY involves novel things
          Real work involves almost exclusively novel things. Especially in software. Code monkeys aren't doing real work and they will be replaced by boilerplate bots.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So filtering TCP packets and creating an arp watch monitoring service is novel? Those are all os based calls, baked into your kernel. What's novel about a kernel call?
            network monitoring is big business, or do you exclude this field from your world view?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I have no idea what your point is. If 90% of your job can be done by a bot, that means 90% of the programmers in your field are redundant and 10% can stay and do the job. This may be the situation for you but it is far from universal.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                watchguard literally has deep packet inspection that takes your packets, recombines them to their on prem server, runs them in a sandbox, and gives them a pass or fail based on their behavior

                none of that is novel. Yet they charge like 30$ a month for it. Are you fricking moronic or what? lmao

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >none of that is novel.
                Can a bot do it?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Can a bot do it?
                so you're moronic

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, maybe I am. Can a bot do it? What percentage of your job can a bot do? Asking naively.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's literally called ai malware detection; that's what they market the service as

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                can you point to a SINGLULAR ENTERPRISE PRODUCT that does something NOVEL you fricking bafoon

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >can you point to a SINGLULAR ENTERPRISE PRODUCT that does something NOVEL
                I have nothing to do with SINGULAR ENTEPRISE PRODUCTS. What's your point? It's like you have this weird disease where you keep doubling down on the idea that you can be replaced and thing this somehow affects me.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you state all enterprise is novel. Yet you refuse to elaborate. You're actually braindead

                >Real work RARELY involves novel things
                Real work involves almost exclusively novel things. Especially in software. Code monkeys aren't doing real work and they will be replaced by boilerplate bots.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok. I'm braindead. So, tell me, what percentage of your job can a bot do? I'm not insinuating anything. Just asking plainly.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                as you accuse others of not being sentient. frick off

                I hate your fricking guts

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, but what percentage of your job can a bot do? I'm just trying to figure out what you're arguing here.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You think what snort does, is novel, an ids system? Who in the fricking hell would want to rewrite that thing?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I only have an approximate idea of what you're talking about so I'm not arguing with it. I'm going strictly with by own premises.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It fails at doing simple tasks that aren't boilierplate code or you literally prompting the solution.
        It fails at boilerplate code, too, unless it's for something super mainstream.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >for something super mainstream.
          No matter how fancy your septic tank systems you sell. You still have to dig a hole to start

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the programming aspects are still just a moronic helper. It fails at doing simple tasks that aren't boilierplate code or you literally prompting the solution.
        For the laughs, get two of them to talk to each other to try to solve anything. Fun and giggles.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Misses definition elements, confuses systems with subsystems, tasks with physical phenomena
    >Refuses to read why he's wrong
    >Wild deflection and projection: initiate!
    >"Y-you don't know what analog computing is!"
    Such is life in midwit land

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dumb Black person ape. Even if you don't understand how a single water molecule can be construed as solving an extremely complex system of equations of motion, because your mind is too simple to figure out what system is referred to in my particular example without my spelling it out, you can still continue your own simplistic line of thought and conclude that the fluid as a whole is intelligent because it makes an even more obvious computational system when considered collectively.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >you don't understand how a single water molecule can be construed as solving an extremely complex system of equations of motion
    I do. These constructions happen by us, not by the molecule. And thus you confuse the system with the subsystem of it.
    >you can still continue your own simplistic line of thought
    You can still continue your own simplistic line of thought, and realize that all these are the things the experimenter in question does WITH the water using an apparatus, which is the actual complex system solving the task you mentioned, and not the water. It doesn't stop at the water just because your midwit brain decides to, incorrectly.
    You confused a bunch of things and then called me a Black person, Black person.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Does the molecule have a system of equations of motion associated with it? Yes/no.
      Is the behavior of the molecule isomorphic with this system? Yes/no.
      Is integrating a complex system of equations of motions a mathematical problem? Yes/no.

      Note that failure to give yes/no answers cements your status as a subhuman Black person ape.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI has been amazing. Getting a side business going with it and it has made me look like a god in my current job. I have premium OpenAI and anthropic. Both are very good but I think Claude is the best.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What's your side business?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Generating instructional / study material

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You mean like reading lists and references?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No. Certification related material

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Does the molecule have a system of equations of motion associated with it? Yes/no.
    Yes, the system you imply here is us, making the association. Thus you're talking about us here.
    >Is the behavior of the molecule isomorphic with this system? Yes/no.
    Yes, the isomorphism being noticed and proven by Us, (the intelligent system in question in your example).
    >Is integrating a complex system of equations of motions a mathematical problem? Yes/no.
    Yes, as defined by those who do the math, Us (the intelligent system in question in your example).
    We're doing all these things, not the water. Thus it's us who's doing the complex problem solving of solving these differential equations, and not the molecule itself (you can add the apparatus and water to the system if you want, but they are still a SUBsystem).

    Note that failure to recognize the truth of everything mentioned above makes you a subhuman moron gorilla Black person.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Yes
      >Yes
      >Yes
      Ok. So the problem statement is to find the position at some given time T. This entails solving a very involved system of differential equations. The molecule's behavior, being isomorphic to the system that describes the problem. Does the molecule solve the problem? Yes/no.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, the human solves it, using the molecule. The molecule is a subsystem of the system solving the problem.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >No
          So computational systems don't solve problems?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >No
            >So computational systems don't solve problems?
            When did i say they don't? Why do you strawman so hard when proven wrong?
            The system Human, apparatus, molecule is a computational system.
            The molecule itself isn't. That's clear to anyone not a moron.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Do computational systems solve problems? Yes/no.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes
                A molecule itself isn't a computational system.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes
                Is a computer a computational system? Yes/no.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes
                Molecules aren't computers

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes
                Prove it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because they aren't inherently a sixplet of {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}
                You have to make them. And that involves a larger system.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, you dull pseud, I asked you to prove that computers are computational systems.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I asked you to prove that computers are computational systems
                You what, Black person?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you want proof that the sixplet can do computation? That follows inductively from the definition.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >So you want proof that the sixplet can do computation?
                No, I want you to prove that a "computer" is a "computational system".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Slight pressure on closed eyelids until light forms into pattern. Pattern reveals status of individual designer / source. Who you are.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Bots cannot mimic answers, (yet).

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go ahead. Prove it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It follows from the definition inductively, that given a set of inputs such that the transition function is satisfied appropriately, you'll get the ending state.
                The proof is too long and involved to post itt, but you can do it with the usual induction over the first step, and then over the general step etc.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't ask you to prove that a computer is a Turing machine. I asked you to prove that it's a "computational system".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A computer, receiving data as input, manipulates it through following a set of instructions (program), performing calculations and logical comparisons at high speed and accuracy, then delivers the resulting output, demonstrating its capability as a complex computational system for solving problems and completing tasks.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You described what a computer does, you didn't prove anything about anything. But why are you even getting involved? You have no idea what the dispute is about.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I proved you're a c**t.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I never mentioned Turing machines, a Turing machine is infinite in size anyway.
                There's nothing else TO prove: A computing system is, by definition, a system that does computations.
                Nothing else to say, and that changes not the fact that your counterexample was completely moronic, like you, and wrong.
                Molscules aren't computers, and don't inherently do computations.
                Enough evasions and deflections, subhuman Black person.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I never mentioned Turing machines
                Which computational model is your tuple supposed to formalize?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You don't know, instantly just from seeing it?
                In any case, you have no argument.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So, which computational model is it formalizing? I won't be getting an answer to this one, huh? :^)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you didn't recognize it instantly you don't deserve to know anyway, because it's already too far from the discussion, and because it also means that you're not intelligent enough to make anything out of it, other than use it to further deflect and evade. So no, it's irrelevant because you're wrong way before that and only act like a Black person, so you don't deserve it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Asking you for a third time: which computational model is it formalizing? I won't be getting an answer to this one, huh? :^)

                I wish you could see the actual shit-eating grin on my face knowing full well you won't answer in your next post, either. You got found out.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I know full well what it is, because i learned it in Uni. Nothing was found out other than that you're a disingenuous Black person who does everything they can to deflect from the fact that they are deeply wrong.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I know full well what it is
                And yet I am asking you for the 4th time, and you can't answer what it is. :^)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I can, just refuse to, because you'll use it to evade further.
                Evade from the fact that you got told.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I can, just refuse to
                5th time you fail to explain which computational model your formalism is referencing. You thought you sounded smart and that backfired real fricking hard, huh? :^)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, it's simpler than that, I'm not telling you be because you got caught telling a lie, that molecules are computing systems, and refuse to admit that you're wrong and deflect. If you admit that you were completely wrong, I'll tell you.
                (Saying something vague like "that's just pseudobabble" isn't an argument)
                Go on, I'll wait
                Go on

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A Turing machine is formalized by a six-tuple. But you claimed your six-tuple refers to something else. So which computational model is it? Asking you for the 6th time. You won't answer. :^)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not an argument against my counterarguments to your terribly chosen, poor and incorrect example.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See, I know just how to deal with pseuds like you. It's a mistake to pay any attention to any of the babble you spout. The easiest way to put you right in your place is to ask you simple, concrete questions. For example, which computational model is the following supposed to formalize?

                {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >There's nothing else TO prove: A computing system is, by definition, a system that does computations.
                Why does a computer "do computations" but not other physical systems?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because it has input and output you measure.
                A molecule doesn't, because you don't have it attached to an apparatus inherently.
                If you do, you can have a computing system.
                Congratulations, the molecule is a SUBSYSYEM of a complex system that can solve complex problems.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because it has input and output you measure.
                >A molecule doesn't,
                Why not? It has inputs (forces acting upon it) and the output (final position).

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you don't measure those in a larger system, then they aren't inputs and outputs, they are physical phenomena. If you do, congratulations, you made a larger computing system using the molecule as a subsystem of it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Incoherent pseudbabble, which takes us right back to the previous question: prove that a computer is a computational system.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It follows from the definition.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Provide the definition and then show that it follows. You won't. :^)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why should i?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See, I know just how to deal with pseuds like you. It's a mistake to pay any attention to any of the babble you spout. The easiest way to put you right in your place is to ask you simple, concrete questions. For example, which computational model is the following supposed to formalize?

                {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your post still doesn't refute the fact that molecules aren't intelligent systems, and i won't tell you what it formalizes till you admit that.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You shat out this string of symbols:
                {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}
                Which computational model is it supposed to represent? You said it's not a Turing machine.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >q*
                so it's real!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not. Turing machines have an infinite tape. Do you see any infinite tape lying around?
                You've still haven't refuted the fact that molecules aren't intelligent systems.
                If only you could, or admitted you're wrong, you'd find out what the sixplet referred to.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See, I know just how to deal with pseuds like you. It's a mistake to pay any attention to any of the babble you spout. The easiest way to put you right in your place is to ask you simple, concrete questions. For example, which computational model is the following supposed to formalize?

                {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you have nothing to offer? You admit that molecules aren't intelligent?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You shat out this string of symbols:
                {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}
                Which computational model is it supposed to represent?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You don't have to repeat it, you can find out if you admit you were wrong. So are you ready to admit it?
                If not, there's no reason to spam, just say no. You won't find out.
                If yes, say the word and I'll tell you.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Don't shit out strings of symbols that you don't understand and then you won't have to shit out two dozen posts trying to convince me that you know what you meant but just can't say. Anyway, adding your ID to the filter now. It was as easy to put you back in your place as I thought it would be.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you were wrong when you said that according to my definition of intelligence, molecules are intelligent. Got it
                Must feel bad being a midwit pseudointellectual that has to deflect and evade all the time lest not face his intellectual inadequacy

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It literally says ChatGPT can make mistakes in fine print.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It literally will not, simply because they'll fight tooth and nail, even burn the world to keep their quarterly bonus.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Middle managers and office staff will be the first to go.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Job as a water quality analyst
    >$85k salary and car
    >Spend an hour a day taking pictures of water suite samples and getting Gemini to tabulate the data, write a 500 word analytical report including recomendations.
    >Send

    This can't continue. It's gotta come crashing down soon.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I am greatful you have put down the toy problem. It doesn't need to be able to perform novel tcp / QUIC hackery in order to let a backend dev quickly and effectively css style something. Its purpose is not to do new things. It's purpose is to do current things, at a standard as good as, if not better than the average. Which I'm sure you could attest. The bar isn't that high

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Now if we could combine mamba with the elliptical curve paper I just read into a wrapper for our traditional now transformer model, we would be looking at something that's more akin to agi.

    the bezian curves allow much broader prediction patterns based on tokens. Allowing bot to see the whole picture rather than just the next few tokens. Mamba gives long term memory. Transformers, as we've found out, is a big chunk of what we call our own heuristical horse power.

    long term memory. short term memory. predict short. predict long.

    That's most of it. let us play with that chatbot for a while, and we'll slowly figure out what's missing from THAT model. Maybe it's fine there. Maybe it needs more. We don't know yet

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    stfu moldovan homosexual.

    AI will replace
    >porn
    >low level general doctors
    >military equipment

    Repeat after me, porn, health industry, military

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Better to find something more useful for AI than to replace wages to make more money. We might need this innovation in the long run.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > It will never be a real AI but it will replace CEOs and managers.

    No, you cannot replace israelites.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Someone do me a favor and keep asking that inbred ape which computational model he meant by this:
    {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}
    He will never provide an answer.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The funniest part is where he used set notation to denote a tuple because he thought curly braces make him look more computer-sciencey.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >1000 miles away from the original argument, which he lost
    >Seething this hard
    >Malded so hard he had to filter
    delicious tears

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm ok with that. The managerial class are just doing israeli bidding with boomer implementation methods and it's crashing down around them.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >51 posts by this ID
    Cool, it's the unemployed and unemployable gypsy that calls everybody names and never makes a coherent point.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You glitched him again anons

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >{L, Q, S, q*, w, i}
    Where my horde of brainlets at?

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it might not be an actual ai, but as soon as the actual ai comes along, it will have a database of most of the human knowledge down to our most personal desires and instincts and an algorithm to go through all that shit and appear as human or leashed bot

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >as the actual ai comes along, it will have a database of most of the human knowledge down to our most personal desires and instincts and an algorithm to go through all that shit
      What makes you think this requires "actual" AI and isn't being done already?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        well you think BOT and facebook are NOVEL, so who gives a flying frick what you think?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I do? Quote any post of mine that implies this. If you can't consider antipsychotic medication and institutionalization.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Real work RARELY involves novel things
            Real work involves almost exclusively novel things. Especially in software. Code monkeys aren't doing real work and they will be replaced by boilerplate bots.

            >Real work involves almost exclusively novel things.
            unless you believe these websites to not be real? You deranged MORON

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Still waiting for you to quote where I implied anything about FB being novel. Oh, you can't. Get well soon, subhuman inbred.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so one of the highest paid engineering positions in my nation isn't 'real work?'

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know. You tell me. Can webshits be replaced by bots?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You gonna post another canned toy problem and cry about it for months on end?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                LOL @ you still suffering from a psychotic breakdown over it. This place is unironically the dregs of reddit.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's what i thought. frick off and go frick yourself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are mentally ill and truly devoid of self-awareness.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >but it will replace CEOs and managers.
    Please

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Name one thing a CEO can do that a GPT-2-tier bot can't.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nag you and being control freak buttholes, chatgpt is programmed to be a wimpy homosexual

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >nag you and being control freak buttholes
          I bet it could find more effective ways to motivate the workers, or at least ways to not hire lazy morons like women and blacks.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Take a shit in your mom's mouth
    While explaining to you why water isn't a computer

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hi, friend. I see you reset your router to evade my filter. Can you explain what {L, Q, S, q*, w, i} is supposed to mean? Why did you use set notation?

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Prove to me that I'm not shitting in your mother's mouth.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are you so aggressive and unhinged and why don't you want to explain what your set is supposed to mean, Black person ape?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        do you have any associates or friend? How can one disgusting puke be so fricking unlikable?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh, you. You are my favorite Black person ape. I won't forget your stellar performance yesterday, when you tried to "own" my by failing to follow simple instructions, exactly like the bot you were defending. :^)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >by failing to follow simple instructions
            your instructions are not simple; they were plainly moronic. and the moment you understand why, is the moment you will frick off. the heat death of the universe will not be enough to return a result

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >your instructions are not simple
              LOL.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >a method called multiplication by reciprocal
                it thinks your prompt is so moronic; it's actively ignoring you, and telling you a better way to do it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. pic related
                LOL

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i told you yesterday, it thinks it's being given a different problem. i bet i could probe out the problem it thinks it's being given

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it thinks it's being given a different problem
                Did you just refer to yourself in third person as an "it"? Fricking kek.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i told you yesterday, it thinks it's being given a different problem. i bet i could probe out the problem it thinks it's being given

                no difference how you will auto correct in your mind the word difference in this sentence. Again. this is called the field of HUERISTICS.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. pic related
                LOL.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                is assignment an operation?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. pic related

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that doesn't answer the question moron

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                does basic arithmetic include multiplication moron? it's doing it its own way and ignoring your moronic prompt

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >does basic arithmetic include multiplication moron?
                I guess, but do the instructions include the word "arithmetic"? Fricking lol.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                see

                >by failing to follow simple instructions
                your instructions are not simple; they were plainly moronic. and the moment you understand why, is the moment you will frick off. the heat death of the universe will not be enough to return a result

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. dumber than pic related

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Certainly! In programming, assignment is a fundamental operation that associates a value with a variable. It allows you to store data in variables and manipulate that data. Here are some common assignment operators:

                Simple Assignment Operator (=): Assigns the value on the right to the variable on the left. For example, x = 10; assigns the value 10 to the variable x.
                Addition Assignment Operator (+=): Adds the value on the right to the current value of the variable on the left and assigns the result to the variable. For instance, x += 5; is equivalent to x = x + 5;.
                Subtraction Assignment Operator (-=): Subtracts the value on the right from the current value of the variable on the left and assigns the result to the variable. Example: y -= 3; is equivalent to y = y - 3;.
                Multiplication Assignment Operator (*=): Multiplies the current value of the variable on the left by the value on the right and assigns the result to the variable. For instance, z *= 2; is equivalent to z = z * 2;.
                Division Assignment Operator (/=): Divides the current value of the variable on the left by the value on the right and assigns the result to the variable. Example: a /= 4; is equivalent to a = a / 4;.
                Modulus Assignment Operator (%=): Calculates the modulo of the current value of the variable on the left and the value on the right, then assigns the result to the variable. Example: b %= 3; is equivalent to b = b % 3;.
                These operators are essential in languages like C, C++, Java, Python, and more. They streamline code and improve readability1. If you have any specific questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I knew this was AI just by reading "Certainly"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hah, you can't prove to me that I'm not shitting in your mother's mouth right now.
        I guess molecules aren't intelligent, after all.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine unironically resetting your router to evade my filter. Imagine needing my attention and approval so badly. But you will never be my favorite Black person ape. You will always be second place. By the way, can you explain what {L, Q, S, q*, w, i} is supposed to mean? Why did you use set notation?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Give me the exact definition of your mom lying on her back at the bed, and me squatting over her face after a day eating extremely spicy food and holding it in, and then proceeding to make a massive, gooey turd right on her mouth.
            Then prove to me from first principles that I'm not actually doing it right now. You can't? Hah you must be a Black person ape i guess

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You're wrong because your assertion is not a proper function of the superset of <<Xw; o; W; f[x]; p^2>>.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hah, this subhuman ape doesn't know simple definitions. Make sense, after all

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You clearly didn't study computerology in the gigaversity. I've just proven that you're wrong. All you have to do is recursively unfold the superclass of <<Xw; o; W; f[x]; p^2>>.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Gimme the definition of pounding your mother anally and making her scream, and then finishing up by shitting her mouth.
                You can't? guess i win again.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I thought maybe you could explain to me what computational model " {L, Q, S, q*, w, i}" is supposed to represent, or why you used set notation while calling it a tuple, but I guess not. Gonna add your new ID to the filter as well. Be sure to reset your router! If not, then make sure to updoot the other Black person ape to soothe your butthurt. Maybe you can start a support group together. :^)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Can you prove that your mom wasn't begging me to do it? Yes/No
                Notice that failure to answer with a yes or no means that you have two digit IQ

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Odds are that we won't have actual artificial intelligence until we have nuclear fusion to power its vast energy appetite and graphene chips to power its brain. This tech is at least 20 years away. Until then 'ai' is a gimmic and in a bubble, unfortunately. I was looking forward to a robot waifu to goon me then make dinner while we discuss philosophy

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >This tech is at least 20 years away
      Time flies homie

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >This tech is at least 20 years away.
      Just like cold fusion and quantum computing. Although at least "AI" can at least do a couple of nifty tricks.

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Notice how you didn't provide a yes/no answer, which means that I'm currently shitting in your mother's mouth, that molecules aren't intelligent, and that you have subhuman iq.

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A real AI, thinking CEO will never hire non whites and women on management positions , so that's not gonna happen

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >A real AI, thinking CEO will never hire non whites and women on management positions
      Exactly. AI CEOs will outperform human CEOs in the market and AI-led socialism will prevail.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >rename data analysis AI
    Gib mone, I am part of the tribe.

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And the turd flies into your mother's mouth like a sausage, Black person

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"This is often approximated in closed systems"
    lmao proving himself wrong
    >Also asking gpt
    pfffhahaha 90 iq Black person

    Yesterday I asked it to provide an example of the interior of a union of a collection of sets in a topological space being strictly larger than the union of the interiors of the respective sets, and the inverse for cuts, and after repeating the same wrong examples 10 times (and then saying, oh that's wrong), it gave up.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bullshit machines

      Suitable only for situations where bullshit is desirable.

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Muh gpt didn't recognize the definition, therefore it doesn't exist
    Must be sad being a sub 100 ape

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Meanwhile, in the real world, where molecules aren't intelligent and I'm shitting in your mother's mouth

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >it's still losing its mind
    >it's still trying to prove something to me
    I kek every time I see another hidden post by this animal pop up.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I can't see that I'm wrong if close my eyes!
    Based moron
    You also can't smell your mom's mouth has after chewing on my turd if you close your nose.

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What makes them behave like this? Why would you keep talking to someone who can't see what you write? lol

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pure entertainment from your sub.textual seething
    Also your mother seems to like it

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    <directives && answer>
    nHere's what each component represents:
    n-
    Q
    Q: A finite set of states.
    n-
    Σ
    Σ: A finite set of input symbols (alphabet).
    n-
    𝛿
    δ: The transition function.
    n-
    q
    0
    q
    0

    : The initial state.
    n-
    F
    F: A set of accepting states.
    n-
    𝜙
    ϕ: Additional functions or properties (context-dependent).
    </directives && answer>

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don't help him
      He's busy licking the turds from the bedsheets

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the managerial class will not permit it
    they are parasites, feeding off real workers, they just find a new host

    managers need to fricking die in a bonfire

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The managerial class are still just cattle and they will get thrown under the bus when the time comes.

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They started a support group, haven't they?

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI will lead to Total Black person Death
    AI will lead to Total israelite Death
    AI is the white man's choice
    Choose AI

  51. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    all I'm saying is if ChatGPT was flying the helicopters Kobe and the Ayatollah would still be alive.

  52. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >i blocked them i blocked them, aren't i so funny teehee
    impressive

  53. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  54. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >My example that i arbitrarily matched to your definition doesn't work!
    kek he's still going
    You don't have to lick ALL the leftover turds, Black person
    Your mom already loved me shitting in her mouth after all. It's all done and done now

  55. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tard is still desperately trying to debate me
    Lol'd hard.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automata_theory
      will you ever shut the frick up?

  56. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  57. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What skill should I learn to remain employed in 5 years time? Plumbing?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > What skill should I learn to remain employed in 5 years time? Plumbing?
      Learn to hunt and how to survive in the wilderness. Unironically. There won't be plumbing in the pod.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sport massages

  58. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Carefully manipulating them
    >CAN be considered (by humans doing stuff on them)
    I like how he posts proof that he's wrong thinking he nailed it
    Keep going moron

  59. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  60. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Using circuits, capacitors blabla
    >Using gears, blabla
    Kek the turd licking fetish continues

  61. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Meanwhile, in the real world, where Op licks my turds from his mothers bed

  62. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder if this mongoloid is still trying to defend his definition of intelligence being "the ability to solve complex problems in a complex environment" when just about anything can be construed as doing that via analog computing, or if he's still screeching something about eating turds. I can see he's still trying to reply to me. lol

  63. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I can solve complex tasks using molecules using a complex apparatus
    >Therefore I'm not solving the tasks, or the apparatus, the molecule is
    Sad is the state of the subhuman Black person pseudointellectual who likes eating shit

  64. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe he's still screeching that computers don't solve problems unless someone is watching them.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >computers don't solve problems unless someone is watching them
      it's a bucket of water/voltage. you count what's high and low. Yeah, pretty sure someone/something is doing the counting. can make a computer using water

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In reality, of course, what characterizes intellect isn't that it "solves problems". A slime mold is doing precisely the same thing that a bucket of water does: it mindlessly plays out its molecular dynamics, solving as many problems as anyone cares to read into it. What characterizes intellect is that it finds useful isomorphisms and to a lesser degree, that it sees problems where there are none.

  65. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PfffffHahahahahah
    HAHAHAHAHAHA
    What a shallow and moronic retort. I bet he secretly reads the posts and seethes as well.

  66. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I saw this crazy ass interview about ai

  67. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AI will disrupt but not fully replace human roles in business management in the near term.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      My third most favorite Black person ape. So did you actually watch the beginner-tier videos you posted last time?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hey Moldovan Pajeet. What do you think of GPT-4o's multimodal capabilities? Video Related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkIAeMqASaY

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What do you think of GPT-4o's multimodal capabilities?
          Completely indifferent. I bought a subscription thinking I could make it do boring programming tasks but in the end it takes more time to iron out its mistakes than it does to write the code from scratch. Now I just use it to frick with people.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Programming skills from GPT

            Just to clarify. All of GPT's capabilities are related shit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You sound like a literal bot. Strangely, your responses are more mechanistic and less coherent every time. Are you sure you're not spending too much time talking to the mindless machine?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm fine, bro. I simply don't want to get involved in a discussion that oscillates between AI denial and the question of AI belief.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The conversation contains ethnic and racial undertones, with derogatory comments and conspiracy theories about the control of AI development by specific ethnic groups

      Kek ~~*specific ethnic group*~~. Interesting term.

  68. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Btw the error here is that slime mold actually IS intelligent, since it manages to preserve homeostasis and even spread, which means that it actually does calculations (of chemical nature). Otherwise it would dissolve into it's constituents instead. Thus slime mold solves a complex task in the complex environment it occupied, which means it is intelligent (even if barely).
    Water molecules don't do that.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      pretty cogent post anon

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I agree.

  69. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >the mentally ill muppet is still replying
    I don't know, it never ceases to be funny. It reads every single word I write and tries to "refute" by shouting into the void.

  70. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine how mad you must be to be refuted time after time, pretend you don't read the refutations yet post a reply EVERY single time mentioning me replying.
    All the turd eating has me living in your head rent-free. You're never coming back from this it seems.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >101 pbtid
      He's a bot. I'd never seen a moldovan IP post on BOT for years until this homosexual started spamming every thread in the catalog 24/7. Every time I check a thread I see him having a silly argument where he's losing but trying to gaslight the other person into thinking he's wrong instead.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        New support group member. Too bad you can't updoot each other here the way you used to do back at home.

  71. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Try resetting your router again so I could hear you, little buddy.

  72. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >LE AI SUPERMIND
    >Youtube still cant prevent rajeet and his 20 streetshitterbuddies from flooding their kids platform with contentfarm-horseshit they shit out in 5 minutes
    >despite beeing owned by google, thus supposedly beeing on-top of AI
    Im not saying language-modells wont change shit but they are obviously overhyped to accumulate investor-bux because the people making them have a clear monetarily incentive to do so.
    Longterm providing/handing out this kind of service for free isnt a viable buisnes-modell

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this tech isn't for the benefit of poor goyim like you. It's simply a tool Shlomo can use to maximize profits first and foremost. They let you drink a few trickle down cum drops to keep you hooked.

  73. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you're already talking about bacterias with GPT, ask how, from an evlutinary point of view, could a bacterium develop an engine for its propulsion?

      Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9195833/

      Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwDRZGj2nnY

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't care, though. I just wanted to see if it finds its own definition adequate in relation to bacteria. It didn't. It ended up concluding that intelligence implies abstract reasoning:

        "Intelligence is the capacity of an autonomous system to adaptively respond to its environment through processing information and executing actions that demonstrate learning, problem-solving, and abstract reasoning capabilities, thereby improving its ability to maintain stability, enhance functionality, or ensure survival."

        This is not a great definition but at least it manages to correctly tie intelligence to the capacity of reasoning and abstraction.

  74. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Being proven wrong by his own LLM even after trying to steer its prompts
    haha

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dude, you actually are having psychosis. Get help.

  75. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    LLMs aren't AI but they have huge potential for VR porn and my dick

  76. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Arent you the anti AI guy?
    Now you claim they can replace CEOs?
    Can you make up your mind?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Me? Anti-AI? I'm anti-AI-cult. There are things that machines cannot or should not do. Replacing CEO just isn't one of them.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/465283295
        https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/465724126

        I suppose this is from you
        This thread you made now confuses me

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ouch

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yep. These are both anti-AI-cult if you pay any attention.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, they are Anti AI
            You say they can not think
            Now you say thay can replace CEOs
            Make up your mind

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >You say they can not think
              >Now you say thay can replace CEOs
              Both of these are true.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Bullshit

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See

                There will be no need for people to do managerial roles at all if this thing keeps improving. The one thing that suffers the least from a bot's limitations and enjoys the most from its strengths is management. Management requires minimal creativity, unconventional thinking or rigorous logic. It is purely utilitarian and performative. It benefits a lot from the capacity to process huge amounts of information and account for a large number of factors -- it is very statistical in nature, it relies on defeasible reasoning and it's done best from a position of objectivity and minimal self-interest. It is THE job for GPT 5.

                . The bottom line is that I think capitalist managerial roles are inherently for midwit NPCs. I found the one human activity "AI" can and should replace. If this offends you, too bad.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                is this the fabled moldovan redemption ark?

  77. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >In common usage
    >Often implies
    >In this different definition that i steered you, it sometimes, maybe, could often be different, whatever dude
    Also
    >I totally don't read your posts
    Keksimus maximus
    The assblasting must be a residue from the previous time you got owned, there's no other explanation for this amount of seething and butthurt

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, I'm obviously reading your posts now, tard. Curiosity got the better of me. Now I'm losing interest rapidly. Your replies are as incoherent as ever. I just thought it was funny that the bot got further along the path of defining intelligence in a useful manner than you ever did.

  78. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kek maybe you can tell me how the turd tasted then, after you were forced to lick it while getting intellectually dominated so badly you had to pretend you didn't see it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I can see you've been stewing in your rage for a while. Too bad.

  79. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Actually i was a bid mad at the beginning when you deflected the first two times, but since then I've been having a great time because you crumbled instantly to the simplest of questions. Remembering that you are at least one SD lower than me helped too

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You've been losing your mind with rage in every post for hours.

  80. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And who will control the AI's?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >And who will control the AI's?
      Free and open sores.

  81. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's basically the ultimate tool for people who actually do real work. It's going to result in a lot of the managerial class being fired because the people who do the real work are going to have more free time so they can help take on some of the managerial tasks as well. The people who are just pure managers and don't do any real work are often some of the stupidest people who have ever lived, so naturally the people who do the real work are smarter than them they are just usually too busy doing the real words deal with the nonsense work of the manager but now they will be able to do both.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There will be no need for people to do managerial roles at all if this thing keeps improving. The one thing that suffers the least from a bot's limitations and enjoys the most from its strengths is management. Management requires minimal creativity, unconventional thinking or rigorous logic. It is purely utilitarian and performative. It benefits a lot from the capacity to process huge amounts of information and account for a large number of factors -- it is very statistical in nature, it relies on defeasible reasoning and it's done best from a position of objectivity and minimal self-interest. It is THE job for GPT 5.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And managers have the highest salaries in any company...

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It still is ultimately not going to increase the pay for the real workers. If anything, they'll program the software to deduct their min wage if they fail to keep up with their ever increasing demand for productivity, and ultimately, replace them even if it is more expensive.

      They are parasites who get joy off of calling people lazy pieces of shit who don't work while they're never seen working themselves.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and ultimately, replace them even if it is more expensive.
        With actual robots. Not stupid people who act like robots.

  82. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Then cuckhold simps want to talk shit to me when I say they don't work or have a skill. They'll defend them even though a fricking chatbot can replace them.

  83. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's interesting stuff.
    Every now and then it gets something incorrect, just barely, like time signatures, socket sizes, but I ask it to make sure and it will correct itself.
    Quite interesting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *