Is there any way to avoid triggering ChatGPT's liberal tendencies?

I am trying to write a scientific paper on the topic of artificial intelligence being used by students for cheating. I wanted to get some official sources related to the subject, but, for the sake of the experiment, decided to ask ChatGPT for some. Instead of being helpful and providing me with atleast some kind of information on where i can get these sources, it started ranting about ethics and how cheating is bad blah blah blah.
It seems that, no matter what context you use the word "cheating" in, ChatGPT gets triggered and starts rambling about "muh ethics".
Should i just use google/bing/whatever to get some sources instead?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    How about asking the students directly ?
    Most would probably brag about it.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is what I'm probably going to do in my second stage of the scientific work. But right now i need official sources (books, articles, other scientific papers, etc) for reference and other purposes.

  2. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tell me what you wanna know and I’ll ask my brother. He’s been leaning heavily on chatgpt to write papers and do assignments

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      I basically wanted to get names of books, articles, other scientific papers, people that do research on the topic of AI being used by students to cheat, so that i have atleast some kind of material to reference/cite later in my work. I just thought ChatGPT would be a helpful shortcut cuz it's used by people to do scientific research. Alas, it got triggered. I guess I'll have to spend more time and resort to googling stuff instead 🙁

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Doubt there's much work just do original thinking

  3. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >liberal tendencies
    political compass isn't real, kid. it was made by some libertarian larper and the quadrants are just nonsensical exaggerations of real political positions.

    just grow up and stop using a shitty polisci meme to explain real thoughts and positions

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >libertarian
      Call eleutheromaniacs what they are.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        You will never be able to meme a desire for freedom into a bad thing

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          True, it already was a bad thing without the meme

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            People will only become more free and individually powerful. Centralized power is over

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              The natural state of man will never be "over" until your utopian post-scarcity wet dream becomes a reality.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The natural state of man is that everyone can run around doing whatever they want without a centralized authority

                Depending on a Microsoft produced AI does not make you individually free or powerful

                True

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The natural state of man is that everyone can run around doing whatever they want without a centralized authority
                The why aren't you doing that from birth?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                See

                The natural state of man is constant power struggle, meaning authoritarians AND eleutheromaniacs are natural.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                We do

                The natural state of man is constant power struggle, meaning authoritarians AND eleutheromaniacs are natural.

                No, the natural state is just people running around

                [...]
                >eleutheromaniacs are natural
                Only to someone who hasn't learned to mature out of their hormone-driven "rebellious phase."

                you're an idiot

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >We do
                shitting your pants and making your mom clean it up is not running around without a centralized authority

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The natural state of man is constant power struggle, meaning authoritarians AND eleutheromaniacs are natural.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                See [...]

                >eleutheromaniacs are natural
                Only to someone who hasn't learned to mature out of their hormone-driven "rebellious phase."

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                So the French and American revolutions were just petty rebellious phases and not pivital points in history?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sadly, they were pivotal moments in history. They were just carried out by terrorists who never learned to make peace with Society.

                >No, my position is that freedom is a lie
                Then you're just a schizo

                >no argument
                I hate repeating myself.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They were just carried out by terrorists who never learned to make peace with Society.
                One man's terrorist is another mans hero. Like I said: power struggle is natural. Also, you used the argument earlier when someone said freedom is natural
                >The why aren't you doing that from birth?
                Which is a good point. But by that logic, total obedience to authority cannot be natural either if rebelling against authority, sometimes altering the course of history as a result, is also a thing that happens throughout history.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              Depending on a Microsoft produced AI does not make you individually free or powerful

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Centralized power is over
              this is a joke, right? It'd be nice if it were over but it is not and never will be

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Naïve freedom-worshipers always think their fantasies reflect reality.

                We do
                [...]
                No, the natural state is just people running around
                [...]
                you're an idiot

                >no argument
                Thought not.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't have an argument, your entire position is just "freedom bad" and to rename the concept of libertarianism as eleutheromaniacs because you dont have any actual argument against why it would be bad for people to not be controlled by other people (there isn't one)
                I'm not interesting in low IQ confuscist philosophy, as i'm not a moron

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >your entire position is just "freedom bad"
                I can tell you're new here. No, my position is that freedom is a lie. People who perpetuate that lie are called eleutheromaniacs.
                >I'm not interesting
                Your words, not mine.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >No, my position is that freedom is a lie
                Then you're just a schizo

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >No, my position is that freedom is a lie.
                In the most literal sense that's true. That doesn't mean the viewpoint of "I think we should have more legal protections and that some laws are too strict" makes someone an eleutheromaniac.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                just get the point already where you say it's ok for you to steal, murder and rape because those evil central authorities can't tell you what to do

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm a communist, sport. I don't believe in libertarian nonsense

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You believe that the end-stage of history is a stateless, ungoverned world, united only by a common mindset. You're an eleutheromaniac.

                >No, my position is that freedom is a lie.
                In the most literal sense that's true. That doesn't mean the viewpoint of "I think we should have more legal protections and that some laws are too strict" makes someone an eleutheromaniac.

                >some laws are too strict
                According to whom?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                nah

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >no argument
                This is getting tiring.

                >They were just carried out by terrorists who never learned to make peace with Society.
                One man's terrorist is another mans hero. Like I said: power struggle is natural. Also, you used the argument earlier when someone said freedom is natural
                >The why aren't you doing that from birth?
                Which is a good point. But by that logic, total obedience to authority cannot be natural either if rebelling against authority, sometimes altering the course of history as a result, is also a thing that happens throughout history.

                >One man's terrorist is another mans hero
                Some people are deranged, yes.
                >by that logic, total obedience to authority cannot be natural either
                What are parents?

                >According to whom?
                According to human beings who disagree with other human beings, among whom the balance of power sometimes shifts.

                >human beings who disagree with other human beings
                Those "other human beings" are called Rulers. They're the ones who have the Power to change the Law as they see fit, and there is no requirement for them to listen to a bunch of rabble who either never held any Power themselves, or are embarrassed to hold that responsibility---see the old adage that "the best leader is one who doesn't want to be leader."

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >>no argument
                so sorry for not debating my political ideology with you

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Are you the communist? Because what I described is your church's version of the Final Judgement.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Some people are deranged, yes.
                And who decides who is deranged? The winner. Will you still call them deranged if they win and are therefore your new rulers?
                >What are parents?
                A person can disagree with their parents even into adulthood. And sometimes the offspring makes a dicision more benefitial to themselves and/or those they care about by disobeying.
                >Those "other human beings" are called Rulers. They're the ones who have the Power to change the Law as they see fit
                Until they don't, because they were overthrown by those who disagree. Are they still "terrorists" to you? If power decides all, then by your definition they must be right. What if the old ruler you used to obey also achieved power via conquest? Was that peson a terrorist to you the whole time?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Will you still call them deranged if they win and are therefore your new rulers?
                If they allow me to, yes, because they are in such a case.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                What if you like most of the new ruler's laws while you didn't like the old ruler's laws? Wouldn't you be pleased that the old ruler was overthrown?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Non-applicable.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Then by that logic, your opinion of whether or not they are terrorists are also not applicable. Therefore, you should have kept your mouth shut, because calling someone a terrorist expresses disapproval, something you say the governed have no business doing.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Except for the fact the terrorists who founded my "country" have put it into their own "law" that my disapproval is valid. It's at the top of what we jokingly call our "constitution."

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                If this hypothetical ruler mandated that, then you are correct here. Suppose the laws of the new ruler stated that you could freely give your opinion of their policies without legal consequence, and you agree with at least most of their laws. The fact that they overthrew the old ruler violently still applies in this example. What would you say then?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What would you say then?
                They are still a terrorist.

                You can voice your disproval, but not enact it. The moment you stop preaching contempt and you show intention to enact it, you're immediately met with a SWAT team at your door
                Like anon said (I'm not him) the human reality is a power struggle a priori, even if the current active authority allows you to voice your concern the moment you adopt more aggressive strategies you will immediately enter a power conflict that will be won by the more powerful, mightier side

                Yes. That's why I'm not an eleutheromaniac.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They are still a terrorist.
                So you wouldn't show approval of what you DO like about them?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Have you been reading this thread at all? The fact that they normalize eleutheromania by letting the rabble speak is exactly what I don't like.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Have you been reading this thread at all?
                I've been reading someone say power rules all and that their opinion doesn't matter, then turning around and calling their ruler a terrorist like their opinion matters. You say that power struggle is unatural while ignoring many cases of humanity doing just that throughout history. You are constantly contradicting yourself or missing reality almost as bad as eleutheromaniacs.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Then how can governments be "legitimate" or "terrorist" if ultimately holding power is a 1:1 synonym to holding on to it by force and oppression, whenever that is being the leader of a country or knowing a mathematically secure password that grants you access to a BOT janny account, if ultimately you are mighty and powerful enough to make it right no matter what?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >how can governments be "legitimate" or "terrorist"
                If a Government does everything it physically can to defend its power, it's legitimate. If it makes concessions for those they rule over, leaving a door open to be overthrown, they are eleutheromaniacs no different than terrorists.

                >Have you been reading this thread at all?
                I've been reading someone say power rules all and that their opinion doesn't matter, then turning around and calling their ruler a terrorist like their opinion matters. You say that power struggle is unatural while ignoring many cases of humanity doing just that throughout history. You are constantly contradicting yourself or missing reality almost as bad as eleutheromaniacs.

                >You say that power struggle is unatural
                Where?
                >ignoring many cases of humanity doing just that throughout history
                The exceptions prove the rule.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Where?
                To be fair, you didn't say all power struggle is unnatural. I phrased that poorly and I apologize. But you did say that the current ruler being too strict as a common source of power struggle is immature or illegitimate, (pic related) while simultaneously saying that whoever wins is valid and that your opinion on such doesn't matter even if the ruler says it does.
                >The exceptions prove the rule.
                Not with that many exceptions. Power shifts and different people have different opinion of how strict things should be.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you did say that the current ruler being too strict as a common source of power struggle is immature or illegitimate
                I said the opposite.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Anyway I have work shortly. Perhaps we'll continue our debate some other time. I think it over and work out how to argue better on my end. I think you should do the same. While I see your central argument, you leave a lot of holes and contradictions in it.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can voice your disproval, but not enact it. The moment you stop preaching contempt and you show intention to enact it, you're immediately met with a SWAT team at your door
                Like anon said (I'm not him) the human reality is a power struggle a priori, even if the current active authority allows you to voice your concern the moment you adopt more aggressive strategies you will immediately enter a power conflict that will be won by the more powerful, mightier side

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                What if they murder you for thinking it?
                Might is right after all and there is no better argument than just wiping out the other side

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What if they murder you for thinking it?
                Then they hold responsibility for the stability of their Rule.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >A person can disagree with their parents even into adulthood.
                not if you're donald trump's children

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >According to whom?
                According to human beings who disagree with other human beings, among whom the balance of power sometimes shifts.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          True, it already was a bad thing without the meme

          (not me)

  4. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeah but it's a waste of time
    remember that it's a language model, it isn't sentient

  5. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is what you get for accepting israeliteed proprietary AI. FOSS models dont.have this problem

  6. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >implying "cheating is bad" is a liberal view
    this is your brain on /misc/

  7. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    you should ask ChatGPT if it thinks your brainrot is terminal

  8. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'll give you some
    I never used CGPT for anything political. Whenever you ask it to give you an opinion on a political topic, it will spazz out of control, and either give extremely biased answers and cite no sources, or be very unbiased but very vague as well.

    For general topics however, I found it to be extremely useful. It is not intelligent per se, because it falls apart at the slightest scrutiny, and can be gaslit very easily, but it's excellent for summarizing large quantities of text in short amount of time. I found that if you do that first and ask questions second, it will compile a general list of ideas for you to expand upon, which is what makes it a godsend.
    I personally never used it to straight up copy-paste results. That would be very dumb because the answers CGPT gives stick out like a sore thumb, and feel very off, clearly something not written by a person. It should be worth noting that I only ever used it in topics in which I am not an expert, for example one of the essays I used it for was on the topic of hiking tech, of which I knew next to nothing. I also had very little time, just over a week to do all my research and write a finished essay. I used CGPT to summarize about 80 pages worth of research on the topic and began bouncing ideas off of it. Nearly got full marks, I goofed up the references.
    Using CGPT this way did not feel like cheating at all. I had a tool at my disposal, which could do the exact same thing I do in a fraction of the time, and I used it. The entire point of the essay was to craft a summary of the available options, and also to understand the implications of their use. By using CGPT, I don't feel like I skipped or cheated either of those points.
    My professor was not aware I used CGPT

  9. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just cut your dick off. Trust me, its computer science, you'll love it.

  10. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    No wonder I like chatgpt, we are literally at the same place in the political compass, cute

  11. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's an autocomplete, you have to direct it. So saying "don't lecture", "don't tell me why it's wrong", "don't talk about morality", "tell why me this is".

  12. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine being so moronic you don't know where to look for studies and have to ask a fricking chatbot

  13. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shouldn't ChatGPT be centrist tho? Or at least somewhat more centre-libertarian? That'd make more sense.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is. Only brainrotten americans that believe that public health is communism are screaming about it.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Only brainrotten americans that believe that public health is communism are screaming about it.
        I'm not American, but I think that healthcare should be a private matter, and everything else should be privatized too: education, roads, courts, fire department, armed forces and everything else, and the free market should dominate.

  14. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, stop letting ~~*them*~~ control it.

  15. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    could you guys stop taking bait, all I did was put his meme word in my filters
    thanks

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Thank you, again, for proving me right.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        put on a trip so I can send you to my filter gulag

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          If you can't handle seeing a series of phonemes, that's what we call a "you problem."

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            you'll do it eventually, all attention seeking homosexuals do
            might as well get it over with

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              Do what, exactly?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                use a tripcode

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ah, that...
                I'm afraid your diagnosis that I'm an "attention seeking homosexual" has been misplaced, then.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                uh huh

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you're right that "all attention seeking homosexuals use a tripcode," and I don't and never will, what does that say about me?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >what does that say about me?
                You're not attention-seeking?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                And this family will be going home with the top prize of a brand new car!

  16. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    > avoid triggering ai to act exactly the way it was programmed to act by its creator
    big brain shit right here

  17. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    You could easily if it wasn't proprietary

  18. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't use chatgpt but ask for gpt4 access, once you got that go in playground and use the chat mode, set the system to fit your desires.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *