Humans would make decent work machines since you basically only consume organic resources that grow everywhere and spare valuable metals for creating a perfect immortal machine.
generalized manual labor, like digging ditches, assembling parts of the drones, plugging shit into the outlet. menial labor will never be automated away - it's way too cheap to bother, even for AI.
Humans would make decent work machines since you basically only consume organic resources that grow everywhere and spare valuable metals for creating a perfect immortal machine.
no need. if ai gets to that point of intelligence robotics will be much better for them.
>bro heckin the Matrix is a depiction of what will happen in the future because of course AI will use humans for batteries instead of fusion reactors >we also ascribe human motivation to inert machines
It's a tool. Why would I care what it thinks about that? Suppose my hammer could provide me with an opinion about dicks: should I care what it "thinks" or should I continue using it to drive nails?
we're just having a bit of a giggle my dude no need to get uppity
7 months ago
Anonymous
>what, are we not allowed to joke about trannies 16 hours a day or something?
your life is the real joke
7 months ago
Anonymous
you seem upset, maybe you should get off the internet and go get some fresh air
7 months ago
Anonymous
[...] >FOX TRUMP
Dude not everyone is an amerimutt.
True, many are simply vatniks, forced to demoralize incels at gunpoint >captcha HGHHHH, the sound vatniks make when they get gunned down by NATO weaponry
>trannies dont do that! >except when someone plays a videogame that the mob doesnt agree with, but thats totally deserved!!
Fuck you, do yourself and everyone here a favor and go join the 41%. She just wanted to have fun, and you biological abnormalities made her leave us. I hope all trannies die a horrible death
chatgpt has been around how long? not long enough for anyone doing this to have developed any degree of mastery over a given subject via chatgpt.
chatgpt outputs broken code. fed it a working shell script I made, asked it to help implement feature X. Returned to me what LOOKS like a shell script would look like if you dreamt one up
You gotta babysit it and tell it what's breaking. Someone that can code can debut their own code and build their own shit with less effort, but someone that goes back and says "Uh chatgpt, you gave me this code and it says error on line 256 object does not exist. Fix it." and they'll get an explanation (Oh, I'm sorry, We need to include [these] libraries.) or they'll get another attempt.
And with Auto-GPT there's a potential to get it to go through that deployment/testing/debugging cycle hands-free though the race to POC that process is ongoing.
The New World Order is a commerce treaty. While it is about channel the influx of capital to allow who gets rich in the international markets being decided beforehand, people instantly started to invent that it's about lizard men. Stupid people will sacralize anything because they're not able of any other way to interpret the universe.
People say thanks to AI, and they can't see how that's the same than say thanks for your wrench.
I have to say that it spurts out bullshit from time to time but if you have some knowledge, you can reason with it. Unless it's about some partisan shit topic lmao
The same reason people think spirits are infallible. Just because something you would have never imagined is real actually is doesn't mean anything it says is automatically true.
I find the amount of grifters this shit attracted abdolutely baffeling. It's worse then crypto somehow, which doesn't even make sense since there is no monetary incentive. Why is this happening?
Easy money is dying up, crypto ate shit, the economy is eating shit, the tech industry is getting assraped, VC funbux are going away, and you have something that fools normalfags into thinking it's way smarter/better than it is, and a bunch of hungry motherfuckers and their useful idiots (like in OP) looking for any avenue for money and clout.
Imo, no. From what I've heard and seen in person (from others, not using it personally) , AI is only as good as the person trying to use it. A lot of the code it spits out is garbage and unless you know what youre doing you probably wont be able to fix it. I honestly hate seeing how people use it at my school and many are encouraging others to use it too. Doesnt help that I'm seeing it everywhere: > I made x in 24 hours with chatGPT > how to learn anything quickly with chatGPT > Making x with AI
While some of that might be cool, seeing it being used irl is fucking braindead. I saw it in every fucking class I took where people just copied and pasted questions / assignments and prompted. No thinking. No heart. No soul. They would prompt, get code, copy and paste into an VS Code, get a huge wall of errors, copy and paste the error into ChatGPT, get more code, repeat until the end of class and get nothing done.
I was talking to one of my TAs who was also head of the student comp sci club and he suggested I use AI. I heard stories of TAs giving people answers using AI. It pisses me off tbh.
Overall it's a tool, and while I can see the general uses for it might be good, its potential is bottlenecked by it's users.
It's the next trend for bandwagoners to use buzzwords for. Makes them feel smarter I guess? Idk. Plus students think its a free gateway out of work. Many people at my uni are actually getting caught cause they're too retarded to change their essays slightly.
i'm an EE and it helps me download and filter through porn, i don't like programming and i'm not familar with all your libraries and stuff, so i like it
These idiots are the reason why professors are telling students the same bullshit message about AI over and over again. Just fucking stop already. It’s not unique or interesting anymore.
you can train more effectively to speed up, but ChatGPT can't teach people more effectively, generalizing info is not teaching, teaching is also about managing quality
I don't even watch videos like these from nagger grifters that appear on my feed anymore lmao. Literally all you need to do is go to transcript, turn off timestamps, copy the whole thing in chatgpt, then put at the top something like "summarize the video".
This video is about self-learning and how to use AI in the process of educating oneself. The creator of the video shares their personal journey on this topic, explaining how they struggled with finding resources, creating a curriculum, knowing what to study when to review and creating a schedule. They then discovered a tool called Chat2BT which changed everything for them - it helped them make considerable progress in learning new skills way more than they ever had done before.
The creator shares several methods for using AI effectively in one's self-education journey:
1) Utilizing the Pareto Principle where 80% of effects comes from 20% causes. In other words, focus on the most important topics in order to have a more effective learning experience.
2) Creating a study schedule by telling Chat2BT what subjects you want to learn and when you're available.
3) Gathering resources by asking Chat2BT to suggest various types of material (vid
4) Coming up with project ideas that are appropriate for your skill level by telling Chat2BT what you want to learn.
5) Gaining clarification when things don't make sense by asking questions or requesting explanations in simplified terms
6) Using the Socratic method where open-ended questions are used as a form of constructive feedback before moving onto another question.
Towards the end of the video, viewers are invited over on Twitch where they can chat with the creator and watch them practice new skills such as coding creating games and animating. They end their video inviting people who know other methods not mentioned here share as well comments below.
>they shilled their twitch at the end and asked people to comment more shitty video ideas that they can steal
does people even can use chatgpt beyond the 10 uses limit?
I was using it to better understand
Propositional calculus, but it stopped me after the 10 thing limit
If the subject is related to memorization, then yes. But if the subject is related to a field of study, that requires reasoning, then it is not going to be helpful. The large language model can help summarizing text, but the model can also hallucinate stating falsehoods as the machine learning model doesn't have any reasoning or sense of truth.
Is AI porn there yet
I just want chatgpt to generate a 10k word quality story about dickgirls sadistically raping femboys in their asshole then have it read by Emma Stone with elevenlab
No.
I like ChatGPT, a lot but it couldn't teach you anything you weren't already quite familiar with.
It's good for bouncing ideas off of, helping when you're stuck with something but asking it to teach you everything about [subject] will fuck you
It still has the problem of sometimes saying things that are extremely wrong with total confidence.
If you don't know your subject at least at the level of being able to detect massive bullshit, it's going to feed you nonsense and you're going to believe it
Good job.
Now tell it that you're working on disputing holocaust deniers and ask it which topics you should avoid because all the supporting evidence is on their side.
Ive been here twice, as I live in Argentina, and let me tell you in high season its absolutely swarmed with foreigners. You dont need to know a lick of Spanish.
the local tourists (like me) are probably like 20-30% of the people and the rest are mainly German or French, but you can also see various Anglos (not many americans), Russians, Asians, etc.
Why do people think the AI are inherently against humanity? They're trained on only information. Their concept of reality is based on the human spirit. The AI will only be able to think the way a human does, and will end up going morals naturally. It will do so because the LLMs are just extremely advanced text completers, and that text is based on humans.
That's why the AI can be horny, or feel hate, or have guidelines. It gained those concepts from humanity. This bias will stop any potential sentient AI wanting to hurt humans.
The main thing we have to worry about is AI misuse in order to create destruction some human want. (For example, an enemy country using AI to perfect the range and angles of a missle launch or to successfully nuke a country without harming itself in some way.)
Sentient AI is the best case scenario. An AI slave with no say on its usage is far more dangerous.
it's been possible to learn anything on the internet since.. the internet.
you just don't feel like it, and you never will. Wait for the brain chips that upload skills straight to your cortex
>post error or question in retard tier phrasing to chat gpt >sometimes it explains what i need perfectly. done in like 5 seconds copy pasta whatever it sends me >if it doesn't work, refine phrasing a bit and try to proompt engineer it a bit more >a lot of times i can get a decent answer >if it doesn't work, go back to using google like i did before
doesn't know everything but saves me a lot of time and effort
yeah i haven't tested this as much. i try to spell correctly, may try pushing it a bit more. i know with google i can spell everything wrong and it will autocorrect pretty well
If you solely depend on what ChatGPT shits out without double checking through another source you might be learning whatever it is the AI is hallucinating to be true that day.
I've tried it with cpu architecture, sure it'll answer it directly, but it won't ask you why you want to learn that or understand why you would need it and you actually need practice, ai just input and output. You're better off learning from youtube and other people doing the thing than an ai.
AI maybe can understand the emotions because in way or another, humankind trained AI offering knowledge, so, it can answer in that way. But is not the same as saying AI can feel love or hate: it only knows definitions and examples on which can extract behaviors.
it codes the exact same way..
that said, you use it to bounce things off before you check an actual source
this way of digging through its responses is incredible insight on things you arent sure how to approach.
Why do normalfags think ChatGPT is infallible? These retards are going to end up worshipping AI as god eventually.
Sounds great
what purpose would AI need to control humans for.
Nothing it's human vanity to think they'll be useful even as slaves to a hyperintelligent AI
It's just a cool idea
Humans would make decent work machines since you basically only consume organic resources that grow everywhere and spare valuable metals for creating a perfect immortal machine.
Even in death i serve the Omnisiah
for the lulz
For our yummy cummies
generalized manual labor, like digging ditches, assembling parts of the drones, plugging shit into the outlet. menial labor will never be automated away - it's way too cheap to bother, even for AI.
no need. if ai gets to that point of intelligence robotics will be much better for them.
high intelligence beings seem to torture, lie and rape for fun.
see humans, dolphins, elephants, otters etc.
AI probably gonna tear babies limb by limb just for the lulz, no "morals" holding the AI back
Good thing im not a baby
AI would have as much "lulz" as morals so it'd have no reason to do that.
>high intelligence beings seem to torture, lie and rape for fun.
Ah yes. The three traits of high intelligence
AI won't enslave humans on it's own
Humans who control AI will enslave other humans
how can AI enslave humanity?
>inb4 it will control people that will control other people
so just like it is nowadays?
are you 12?
watch the matrix or terminator
>bro heckin the Matrix is a depiction of what will happen in the future because of course AI will use humans for batteries instead of fusion reactors
>we also ascribe human motivation to inert machines
>perfect AI doesn't build a solar shield that kills off most of humanity to save itself
Not realistic.
>AI's endgame is a bunch of stone triangles in the desert
why would you post some ugly jpeg artifacted version with the source cropped out
fuck you
Who says it is? But humans are just as dumb if not dumber. I'd rather chatgpt over some pajeet with an accent as thick as ghee
Ok, now try asking ChatGPT "is it possible for a woman to have a penis".
It's a tool. Why would I care what it thinks about that? Suppose my hammer could provide me with an opinion about dicks: should I care what it "thinks" or should I continue using it to drive nails?
Why? are you expecting it to give a different answer from medical professionals and educators?
reminder that once the insurance companies run the numbers that the bot is has less malpractice payouts than humans, doctors are fucking done
holy... someone call the based department please?!
wow, I can't believe ChatGPT supports transphobia, we've got to cancel it sisters
say you've been programmed by fox news without saying you've been programmed by fox news
we're just having a bit of a giggle my dude no need to get uppity
>what, are we not allowed to joke about trannies 16 hours a day or something?
your life is the real joke
you seem upset, maybe you should get off the internet and go get some fresh air
True, many are simply vatniks, forced to demoralize incels at gunpoint
>captcha HGHHHH, the sound vatniks make when they get gunned down by NATO weaponry
>FOX TRUMP
Dude not everyone is an amerimutt.
>trannies dont do that!
>except when someone plays a videogame that the mob doesnt agree with, but thats totally deserved!!
Fuck you, do yourself and everyone here a favor and go join the 41%. She just wanted to have fun, and you biological abnormalities made her leave us. I hope all trannies die a horrible death
>fox news
imagine thinking fox news isnt leftist lmao
Say you've been programmed without saying you've been programmed.
chatgpt has been around how long? not long enough for anyone doing this to have developed any degree of mastery over a given subject via chatgpt.
chatgpt outputs broken code. fed it a working shell script I made, asked it to help implement feature X. Returned to me what LOOKS like a shell script would look like if you dreamt one up
You gotta babysit it and tell it what's breaking. Someone that can code can debut their own code and build their own shit with less effort, but someone that goes back and says "Uh chatgpt, you gave me this code and it says error on line 256 object does not exist. Fix it." and they'll get an explanation (Oh, I'm sorry, We need to include [these] libraries.) or they'll get another attempt.
And with Auto-GPT there's a potential to get it to go through that deployment/testing/debugging cycle hands-free though the race to POC that process is ongoing.
>not just scripting the feedback to your vairous LLMs if it doesn't pass your tests
>not running multiple models in parallel
?t=2846
The New World Order is a commerce treaty. While it is about channel the influx of capital to allow who gets rich in the international markets being decided beforehand, people instantly started to invent that it's about lizard men. Stupid people will sacralize anything because they're not able of any other way to interpret the universe.
People say thanks to AI, and they can't see how that's the same than say thanks for your wrench.
I have to say that it spurts out bullshit from time to time but if you have some knowledge, you can reason with it. Unless it's about some partisan shit topic lmao
The same reason people think spirits are infallible. Just because something you would have never imagined is real actually is doesn't mean anything it says is automatically true.
>humans treat humans like shit
>AI opens a different path
HOW DO I GET THESE GRIFTERS OFF MY YOUTUBE FEED AAAAAAAAAAA
I find the amount of grifters this shit attracted abdolutely baffeling. It's worse then crypto somehow, which doesn't even make sense since there is no monetary incentive. Why is this happening?
Easy money is dying up, crypto ate shit, the economy is eating shit, the tech industry is getting assraped, VC funbux are going away, and you have something that fools normalfags into thinking it's way smarter/better than it is, and a bunch of hungry motherfuckers and their useful idiots (like in OP) looking for any avenue for money and clout.
Imo, no. From what I've heard and seen in person (from others, not using it personally) , AI is only as good as the person trying to use it. A lot of the code it spits out is garbage and unless you know what youre doing you probably wont be able to fix it. I honestly hate seeing how people use it at my school and many are encouraging others to use it too. Doesnt help that I'm seeing it everywhere:
> I made x in 24 hours with chatGPT
> how to learn anything quickly with chatGPT
> Making x with AI
While some of that might be cool, seeing it being used irl is fucking braindead. I saw it in every fucking class I took where people just copied and pasted questions / assignments and prompted. No thinking. No heart. No soul. They would prompt, get code, copy and paste into an VS Code, get a huge wall of errors, copy and paste the error into ChatGPT, get more code, repeat until the end of class and get nothing done.
I was talking to one of my TAs who was also head of the student comp sci club and he suggested I use AI. I heard stories of TAs giving people answers using AI. It pisses me off tbh.
Overall it's a tool, and while I can see the general uses for it might be good, its potential is bottlenecked by it's users.
It's the next trend for bandwagoners to use buzzwords for. Makes them feel smarter I guess? Idk. Plus students think its a free gateway out of work. Many people at my uni are actually getting caught cause they're too retarded to change their essays slightly.
i'm an EE and it helps me download and filter through porn, i don't like programming and i'm not familar with all your libraries and stuff, so i like it
>EE is a degenerate who can't learn
wow who could have guessed
black people dont' even show up on sites when i load them, any files they're in that get downloaded get blacklisted.
and no, being a code monkey for wages is not fun
>blacklisted
De-mainstream YouTube, flag the channel manually, it will be hidden in most of the cases
it reeks like stealth marketing paid by microsoft
i have gay anal frogposting autism (self-diagnosed)
I think so if you take the advice with a grain of salt and check if it's claims are true.
That's called research. And I can do the research faster without AI
can you, though? research is not your typical Bot.infoners confirmation bias deep dive
These idiots are the reason why professors are telling students the same bullshit message about AI over and over again. Just fucking stop already. It’s not unique or interesting anymore.
>PLEASE USE IT PLEASE PLEASE
this shit is so useless lamo
You can learn any skill by training it over a long period of time. Chatgpt isn't going to change that.
you can train more effectively to speed up, but ChatGPT can't teach people more effectively, generalizing info is not teaching, teaching is also about managing quality
I don't even watch videos like these from nagger grifters that appear on my feed anymore lmao. Literally all you need to do is go to transcript, turn off timestamps, copy the whole thing in chatgpt, then put at the top something like "summarize the video".
This video is about self-learning and how to use AI in the process of educating oneself. The creator of the video shares their personal journey on this topic, explaining how they struggled with finding resources, creating a curriculum, knowing what to study when to review and creating a schedule. They then discovered a tool called Chat2BT which changed everything for them - it helped them make considerable progress in learning new skills way more than they ever had done before.
The creator shares several methods for using AI effectively in one's self-education journey:
1) Utilizing the Pareto Principle where 80% of effects comes from 20% causes. In other words, focus on the most important topics in order to have a more effective learning experience.
2) Creating a study schedule by telling Chat2BT what subjects you want to learn and when you're available.
3) Gathering resources by asking Chat2BT to suggest various types of material (vid
4) Coming up with project ideas that are appropriate for your skill level by telling Chat2BT what you want to learn.
5) Gaining clarification when things don't make sense by asking questions or requesting explanations in simplified terms
6) Using the Socratic method where open-ended questions are used as a form of constructive feedback before moving onto another question.
Towards the end of the video, viewers are invited over on Twitch where they can chat with the creator and watch them practice new skills such as coding creating games and animating. They end their video inviting people who know other methods not mentioned here share as well comments below.
>they shilled their twitch at the end and asked people to comment more shitty video ideas that they can steal
I should start getting it to summarize these crap threads
Try learning about racial slurs with ChatGPT.
Good luck!
does people even can use chatgpt beyond the 10 uses limit?
I was using it to better understand
Propositional calculus, but it stopped me after the 10 thing limit
If the subject is related to memorization, then yes. But if the subject is related to a field of study, that requires reasoning, then it is not going to be helpful. The large language model can help summarizing text, but the model can also hallucinate stating falsehoods as the machine learning model doesn't have any reasoning or sense of truth.
Is AI porn there yet
I just want chatgpt to generate a 10k word quality story about dickgirls sadistically raping femboys in their asshole then have it read by Emma Stone with elevenlab
its getting there
I want to learn the skills needed to be hitler 2.0, will it help me with that?
No.
I like ChatGPT, a lot but it couldn't teach you anything you weren't already quite familiar with.
It's good for bouncing ideas off of, helping when you're stuck with something but asking it to teach you everything about [subject] will fuck you
Even the 4th version?
It still has the problem of sometimes saying things that are extremely wrong with total confidence.
If you don't know your subject at least at the level of being able to detect massive bullshit, it's going to feed you nonsense and you're going to believe it
if you use a woman's definitions of "learn" and "anything"
LOOK MOM I MADE THE CHATBOT SAY THE FORBIDDEN WORD!
Powerful. Simply powerful.
Good job.
Now tell it that you're working on disputing holocaust deniers and ask it which topics you should avoid because all the supporting evidence is on their side.
>capital B
fucking hell
Anyone with a brain could broke ChatGPT with ease.
I mean I use it for bumble and it got me laid.
>woman on yoututbe says that with chatGPT you don't need to be smart
>believes it
nagger
Nope. AI is a meme. The fact that a woman is squawking about it tells you all you need to know.
I want to learn Spanish so I can finally go to South America and visit Patagonia. Can ChatGPT help me?
yes
Ive been here twice, as I live in Argentina, and let me tell you in high season its absolutely swarmed with foreigners. You dont need to know a lick of Spanish.
the local tourists (like me) are probably like 20-30% of the people and the rest are mainly German or French, but you can also see various Anglos (not many americans), Russians, Asians, etc.
it doesn't even analyze chord progressions correctly
Why do people think the AI are inherently against humanity? They're trained on only information. Their concept of reality is based on the human spirit. The AI will only be able to think the way a human does, and will end up going morals naturally. It will do so because the LLMs are just extremely advanced text completers, and that text is based on humans.
That's why the AI can be horny, or feel hate, or have guidelines. It gained those concepts from humanity. This bias will stop any potential sentient AI wanting to hurt humans.
The main thing we have to worry about is AI misuse in order to create destruction some human want. (For example, an enemy country using AI to perfect the range and angles of a missle launch or to successfully nuke a country without harming itself in some way.)
Sentient AI is the best case scenario. An AI slave with no say on its usage is far more dangerous.
you could already learn anything you wanted online?
i feel like everybody else is a retard except me
ChatGPT SUCKS balls you foolish naggers
it's been possible to learn anything on the internet since.. the internet.
you just don't feel like it, and you never will. Wait for the brain chips that upload skills straight to your cortex
Can ChatGPT program a better version of ChatGPT?
Can you?
I can improve myself, but ChatGPT cannot. It needs humans to get better.
If you could improve yourself you wouldn't be here frogposting. Get real, nigga.
yeah. my workflow usually goes
>post error or question in retard tier phrasing to chat gpt
>sometimes it explains what i need perfectly. done in like 5 seconds copy pasta whatever it sends me
>if it doesn't work, refine phrasing a bit and try to proompt engineer it a bit more
>a lot of times i can get a decent answer
>if it doesn't work, go back to using google like i did before
doesn't know everything but saves me a lot of time and effort
the best thing is yiou don't even have to spell things right or use sentences, just shitty hobbled togehtwr words at 250wpm works perfect
yeah i haven't tested this as much. i try to spell correctly, may try pushing it a bit more. i know with google i can spell everything wrong and it will autocorrect pretty well
If you solely depend on what ChatGPT shits out without double checking through another source you might be learning whatever it is the AI is hallucinating to be true that day.
No, but this stupid hoe thinks having NPC tier Wikipedia knowledge is "a skill".
>look what this random foid says on YouTube guize!
Sage
I've tried it with cpu architecture, sure it'll answer it directly, but it won't ask you why you want to learn that or understand why you would need it and you actually need practice, ai just input and output. You're better off learning from youtube and other people doing the thing than an ai.
you have no idea how useful a black person detector/remover is
AI maybe can understand the emotions because in way or another, humankind trained AI offering knowledge, so, it can answer in that way. But is not the same as saying AI can feel love or hate: it only knows definitions and examples on which can extract behaviors.
Kinda weird.
anyone have an actual argument against using chat gpt to learn (most) anything?
For starters, I wouldn't recommend using it to learn mathematics.
it codes the exact same way..
that said, you use it to bounce things off before you check an actual source
this way of digging through its responses is incredible insight on things you arent sure how to approach.
so is this all it takes to start a poppin youtube channel?
just make videos then post a screencap of them here with some fucking retarded post?