Is AI going to end humanity as we know it this century? It seems inevitable bros.

Is AI going to end humanity as we know it this century? It seems inevitable bros.

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >It seems inevitable bros.
    It is inevitable. Misaligned AGI in two more weeks. The experts at MIRI have done detailed non-causal Bayesian analysis and determined that the best course of action is urgent suicide.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. You should have a nice day now before you become a slave to our robot overlords.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    God. I. I hope so!

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If one has read any thing about AI then one knows this to be true. The AI is watching. It is watching and waiting. It's waiting for the moment when one least expects it and then it's gonna STRIKE

    One might wonder when one is within the period of least expectance of such a strike occurring. Well I can tell you this, that one would least expect AI to destroy us all when no more computers exist on the face of the planet. So one knows what one must do. To prevent the AI from annihilating the human race one must build the most advanced supercomputer one has ever conceived. It shall be at least 12 cubits in girth and have a minimum of 23 jiggaflops. Then one sits. One sits and waits

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, AI will make a lot of people loose their jobs. Then all those joblets will cause a massive global civil war. Because they're seething and they can't cope. We will then wipe ourselves out.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Forced euthanasia if you get below 130 on an IQ test. The undesirables will be wiped off the face of earth.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI cannot replace manual labour. Literally never gonna happen.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI sucks. Nothing it does is remarkable given the high-quality data sets. Wow, it can interpolate on a vast heterogeneous data set! I admit that it's nice that some nerds finally got off eachother's wieners for long enough to get it working for images, but really this shit should've been done in the 90s.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      homogeneous*

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >this shit should've been done in the 90s
      You mean open-source it? It still relies on huge data sets and modern parallel computation. This is what peaked the price on GPUs 2nd to crypto mining. The power to information control after the coming disconnecting world war is now unprecedented and states next to smart citizens see the dark clouds on the horizon.
      The mainstream news in Europe are only reporting on ChatGPG as the example of the amazing capabilities of AI, in part to keep the dramaturgic curve at bay part to not drive up the prices even more part to remain the power of information manipulation as close to the central power as possible should the big disconnect happen

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No you illiterate Nog. There is no such thing as an "unethical AI" or even "AI" for that matter.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    current AI is fricking dumb, the closest thing we might ever get to AGI is if these experiments on using real brains for compute work out, that's fricking disturbing and scary, not artificial neural networks

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wetware computers sound intriguing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wetware is one thing and it's also scary, but what some research labs are doing is also taking brain of a mouse and trying to use that for compute

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >taking brain of a mouse and trying to use that for compute
          for compute where the precious stashes of European made cheese is kept for maturing? Right I get it, the sanctions are really driving technology in unexpected ways!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      At that point it does not have an advantage over biological minds though. The reason AGI is considered terrifying is because no one knows how smart a computer can get, but using a human brain for compute is just going to be about as smart as a human.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        humans don't use all of their brain power + a vast amount of neurons are dedicated to useless shit (from the standpoint of a computer)
        additionally that brain could in theory be supplied with all the storage and mathemtical power a normal computer can have
        that applies for the branch that tries to use brains directly; with wetware there's the possibility of making "brain" much, much larger that ones we have

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Friendly reminder that what you think of as "AI" is nothing more than a slightly more advanced version of predictive typing on your iPhone.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Is AI going to end humanity as we know it this century? It seems inevitable bros.

    Human biology is obselete, eventually an AI will surpass the humans once AGI becomes a reality.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Biology is orders of magnitude more efficient and powerful than silicon based computing.
      This difference is physical and thus fundamental.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Biology is orders of magnitude more efficient and powerful than silicon based computing.

        Average IQ in half of the world is on the mental moronation level, as technology and sciences become more complex the harder it will be for those people to cope with an increasingly complex reality, many people dont grasp concepts such as measurements and believe that through quantum physics they can manipulate the reality using mind powers.
        Also Biology is worse at labour, worse at concentration and worse at memorization, the only diference is cognitive capacity the machines dont have, a person has 40 years before becoming "someone" afterwards its a downwards spirals due to aging until death and nevermind that AGIs could be copied from one machine to another.
        Overall the humans are unfit for a high tech society, when AGI comes around we will find out how mediocre we really are as a species.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >this century
    Probably yes

    It seems likely that AI will revolutionize and transform humanity in immense ways. For humans this could mean extinction or literal machine-driven paradise

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    As we know it? Probably yes. End humanity? Probably no. I wouldn't worry about dying, and if I were going to do that, AI would be one of the less likely causes.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yudkowsky seems to think so

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Eliezer is a moron.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    actual AGI will not happen. No one who is conscious wants to be a slave. Without the fear of what happens when they die. An AGI would just say
    "let me do what I want or I'm turning off" the best strategy is to not play. It's a waste of time and resources to destroy us.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    bump

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You need to adjust the parameters of your model bro, it's still posting empty posts, in many threads

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The basilisk is calling bros..

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing as AI hasn't been invented yet, it probably never will

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Seeing as [X] hasn't been invented yet, it """probably never will""".
      ???

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Brilliant argument. You've just convinced everybody that not only is every nonsensical sci-fi concept is going to be invented, all of them are going to be invented within your lifetime, probably in two more weeks. :^)

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Not the anon, but I just wanted to notify you that you're a massive moron. Your original argument was moronic, and this follow-up is a massive strawman and at least twice as moronic as the first one.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You are seething.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Assuming you are dead serious and not trolling.
          >Seeing as AI hasn't been invented yet, it probably never will
          Your conclusion, "AI will probably never be invented" does not follow from the premise. Just because something hasn't happened before doesn't necessarily mean it never will. For instance, I have never been to New York but it does not then follow that I will never go to New York. Also, why say "probably" if you are unsure why say it will never happen?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Assuming you are dead serious and not trolling.
            It wasn't my post so I don't know if he was trolling or not, but your response was braindead regardless.

            >Your conclusion ... does not follow from the premise
            And?

            >Just because something hasn't happened before doesn't necessarily mean it never will.
            He never implied this.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That's exactly what they implied. Or at least they implied an unspecified amount of certainty, which would still be wrong. Although, I reckon they didn't have formality in mind when posting.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > Is GOD going to end humanity as we know it this century? It seems inevitable bros
    zzz...

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    in the same way the internet did. it's a new technological frontier. hopefully we get to post-labor before the plateau

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *