Is AI companions more of a threat to men or women?

i keep seeing in pol people saying how roboWaifus will end the "woman problem"
and women will be the ultimate losers in this game, but is that true?
let's look at it this way
why do women marry men in this day and age?
money?
>she is already working and women are slowly out-earning men
sex?
>1) can have sex anytime she wants 2) women aren't as horny as Hollywood wants you to believe
social status?
>being a somebody in a working place is good enough for them, also it's not that important for them, just look at billionaire's marriage status, most of them are divorced

the only thing left is emotional intimacy or love

women love to hear compliments a lot, an AI boyfriend will always give her the best compliments, the best poetry, she will not fear getting controlled like in a real relationship

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they still only want chad, moron. Chad isn't going anywhere. but normie might have that crumb of female validation taken away from him in favor of ai fantasies

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what does a Chad has that a AI husband doesn't have?
      both are confident, both got the abs
      but the AI is smarter and more romantic and loyal unlike a chad

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        a physical form

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the same can be said about ai girlfriends

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah but the guys who larp with these ai gfs can't get access to real women anyway.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous
            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              And these women can't get access to Chad so what's your point?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                sure they can.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >sure they can
                >posts a graph that proves they can't
                >0% most attractive
                O Chad where art toe or whatever

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not exclusive access, but they can be part of a harem, which is fine for most women.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Males are already getting nothing, so something is better than nothing. Sexbots are also the final end point of this technology, and as you stated, women don't derive the same validation from sex that men do. Sex for women is easy and nearly free, for men it is expensive and hard to get.

        Social capital. Women want Chad to show that she is the best girl and the other hoes can suck it. Also, sexdoll sales confirm that males will be the ones benefiting from AI companions. Nobody will be impressed by Becky's robot because anybody can have him.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Becky has a dildo collection already

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Dildos don't have the same profit margins as a robots. You can charge Becky $400 for a good vibrator. You can charge Timmy $40k for a sexbot. You could even have John take out a $400k mortgage on a high end sexbot and artificial womb service (family plan) and permanently have him as a customer, forced to pay for things if he wants to keep access to his wife. You could even make John work in dangerous or remote areas like this, since John will kill himself from loneliness if he refuses.

            Women are harder to please than the average man, and thus, it is more profitable to sell robots made for men.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Nobody will be impressed by Becky's robot because anybody can have him.

          bingo

          Men will love AI bots, Women will seethe

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I mean, its so fricking obvious. Men have always bought wives. Women were considered the same as livestock. The last 150 years are an aberration from what is normal throughout human history.

            Only a woman would be dumb enough to even ask a question like OP.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what does a Chad has that a AI husband doesn't have?
      both are confident, both got the abs
      but the AI is smarter and more romantic and loyal unlike a chad

      what you all are failing to see is that most women do want romance, they just want it with chad

      they put up with getting dogged out and being the side chic in the hopes that chad will be loyal to them one day

      AI will pull millions of mediocre beckys out of dating forever because they would rather have machine AI chad than date their looksmatch

      screencap this

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I only care about robowaifus. If robohusbandos make women happy too, good for them.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but i thought pol was about tradition and preserving society and race and shit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The next generation of evolution is decoupled from women and biological constraints. This is how whites can be preserved.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          HOLY SHIT ANON

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Also it seems like women are much more against robo partners. If I had to guess why they’d be against them, it’s because they are prone to being disatisfied by anything.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The threat is to society as a whole. Acceleration of the collapse of the family model. Less and less marriages are happening, especially in developed countries and it will get worse when there is less incentive to seek a partner.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The elites didn't realise that there's a point where men stop competing with eachother for scraps. The narrator is very low to please men. It's become exponentially higher for women. Everyone loses, but AI chatbots don't come with a line of credit or social attention, so women don't care about those things.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women obviously, an ai boyfriend can't pay for all your shit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >women will suffer wage slaving to pay for an ai boyfriend and cat food

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Is
    The correct word is "Are", you Black personbrained gaytard.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      is you sure about that?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can you stick your dick in an AI companion? No? Ok questioned settled.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI sexbots are, at the most, 15 years away from widespread commercial available. We will take the robodick and we will be happy.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Men can easily create fantasy lands inside their heads. Maybe it's a natural trait, born from the absolute abandonment they experience. But for women it's different, they need to actually experience things.
    A man can easily fantasize about his robowaifu being a real person who loves him. Just think about waifuism. But it would be far harder for women. And millions of males have no alternatives and don't expect to receive any love from anyone who isn't a close blood relative, unlike women.
    Still, as long as men are given guaranteed access to subsidized surrogacy right now and robowaifus equipped with artificial wombs in the future, I don't care about women getting robohusbandos and being happy with them. Kudos for them.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    sage

    women need real people wasting real time on them to feel important. men just want to be left alone, which they cannot do, they needs to be a constant level of guilt and shame to try to get them to work and jump through simp hoops. women need what men create to live comfortably. Do I think AI wifes are the solution? No. I do think women will burn civilization to the ground before admitting they were perhaps sold a fantasy from the TV and their parents though. Nobody cares about a MA in Sociology, stacy.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *