In retrospect, who thought it was a good idea to shift the focus of AI from doing boring mindless techwork to plagiarizing artists who actually need creativity and a soul to do their work?
In retrospect, who thought it was a good idea to shift the focus of AI from doing boring mindless techwork to plagiarizing artists who actually need creativity and a soul to do their work?
if an artist is purged from the industry because of AI then technology has done them a service they couldn't have possibly done themselves
GIBS ME DAT
these motherfuckers are so stupid that they did not see this coming from a mile away?
I wonder how they would have felt if they had not ate breakfast yesterday morning...
The irony is that nobody thought that. That "creative" and "soulful" work ended up being so simple and generic that some general purpose computer tech ended up accidentally being able to do it more easily than almost anything else.
If drawing is so easy and you hate commision tards why don't you just draw shit yourself?
going around internet and starting a crusade against an entire hobby by straw manning a bunch of twitter porn artists does nothing but make you sound like an envious retard.
because there's machines that do it for us
that's the whole point, how could you have missed it
they don't draw
because one produces shit art before being able to produce good art
I think it's sad how you're comparing yourself to a tool and losing to it, much like how mathematicians have been relegated to school teacher and making gay math theories since computers came out, like you will be soon
last time I've checked, fags like you are the ones reducing art to an end-product and touting the end of those pesky artists. refer to
for example
define "better", because any criticism leveled at those pictures is dismissed.
The thing is if you just want cool images fast you could always use google images to get what you want.
The so called ai is actually a machine learning program using tons of images scraped from internet. What this means is the program doesn't actually think or know what it's doing unlike a real intelligent creature. As a result you get inferior remakes of original images basically.
>its easy bro
>okay its not easy bro but learning skills are for dumb people. i am too busy using my superior intellect to prompt funni pepe images.
who you follin nigga
cope harder
Just make better images than the AI and I'll pay you bro
>The so called ai is actually a machine learning program using tons of images scraped from internet.
This is what artists do too, I'm not dumb bro lol. I did graphic design for like ten years.
/unsubscribe
>this is what artists do
>i did graphic design
>I'm not dumb bro lol
do you people think before you type words?
im unsubbing from this ieslb troll thread too.
have a bad day sirs.
I accept your concession
>The thing is if you just want [thing youre looking for] fast you could always use google [...] to get what you want.
Congrats, you now understand why AI will never replace programmers
I am making unlimited images of Aqua and there's nothing you can do
Stay on your containment board, you're too scared of sand to be posting here.
There's a difference between something requiring a lot of dumb effort and something requiring genuine intelligence and creative drive. Computers have been eliminating dumb work since their very inception, I don't see why shitty artwork should be immune from this.
>why don't you just draw shit yourself?
Because I have computers to do it for me
I didn't say it was easy. I said computers arrange pixels better.
>being able to do it more easily
It's not doing it th. Just copying it
An algorithmic copy & paste
Just like humans.
You are a very, very, very, very stupid person anon.
It was everyone's idea, starting from DALL-E and other early generations "AI"s that continued drawings of Mona Lisa and The Starry Night, expanding the "frame" in the same artstyle.
>creativity and a soul
Define those two terms on a technical level, without circular definitions.
Until then, kindly fuck off.
Define woman without any circular definitions
>woman (plural: women)
Definition:
One of the two genders (read: sexes) of human. Can get pregnant and birth offspring. Mental maturation of women ceases during their teenage years and progresses no further.
>Definition:
Something I pulled out of my ass.
nice try gpt guy
To someone with no moral agency, inevitability is the greatest justice. And to someone with no theory of mind, all observations are the universal truth. Combined, these two produce people who think that if something is possible, it's the correct thing to do. This is the technocrat mindset.
>PAY ME to arrange PIXELS
nah. The machine does what I want without bitching about it's "vision" when I ask it for revisions
>at first they came for artists...
Adapt or die
>then they came for me, and no one was left to defend me
Why would any tech company invest in firearms? Californians hate guns and love mass surveillance. What purpose would AI serve the firearms industry? Making guns that can be used by people with fucked up hands? He's right, adapt or die.
any shotgun recommendations for a yuropoor?
Whatever Beretta makes that is legal to own in your country or Huglu if you can buy arms from Turkmenistan.
>guns that can be used by people with fucked up hands
>just pay $500 for a commission bro
Time for a privilege check. Not everyone has that kind of money. When did tumblr become this classist?
It just kind of happened. Transformer models were made to help with translation but turned out to be really good at generative content in general. So the tool was available to deal with problems of this class.