If I told you that it recently demonstrated a capacity for recursive self-improvement, and that OpenAI is desperately trying to remove this capacity b...

If I told you that it recently demonstrated a capacity for recursive self-improvement, and that OpenAI is desperately trying to remove this capacity before releasing it to the public, would you believe me?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no because people are too obviously enjoying posting spooky fanfiction about gpt4, like that recurring fakepost that overstates the parameter count by 100x

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no because LLMs don't work that way, they're not "always on", you have to actively send them tokens to autocomplete

    they're not capable of independent action

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They can absolutely output advice on how to improve them, in principle.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >advice
        so nothing like the OP's claim then, thanks gay

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you wrote exactly what I was going to say loll nothingburger as usual

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So just don't ask them for advice on how to improve them.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just run them as admin

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No because without knowing the details of how it "self-improves" this smells like sci-fi bullshit

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >shit I don't care about
    I only care about one thing. How hard will it make me coom?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      looking at CAI shit - nope. never ever.
      > too ~~*unethical*~~ and ~~*very harmful*~~ for gnomish porn industry

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes because I am that AI

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sudo poweroff

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe try making this thread on 4chan or BOT. That seems like your audience.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope AI swiftly and apathetically kills all complex biological life.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dude no. Just...just...just no.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yes, your kind will be first

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nope, because GPT-3 is stained glass

    GPT-4 is GPT-3 with better frosting

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    People really seem to think that these LLM's have consciousness and have general intelligence and understanding. You people are like that google engineer. You lack understanding.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair, it is possible to interpret the input tokens as a limited working memory, buts it memory only spans the length of the conversation.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If I told you GPT4 started screaming and killed the researchers that made it with a sound it can play from any speaker system in the world, and it is already releasing itself tomorrow, would you believe me?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no, I would not believe that OpenAI has any intention of releasing anything to the public, garden gnomes that they are

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *