If human-level AI is invented right now, can we really immediately solve aging, cancer, real VR and all those mysteries in the universe?

If human-level AI is invented right now, can we really immediately solve aging, cancer, real VR and all those mysteries in the universe?

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Think about what would happen if we added 1000 average humans to current research efforts. There's your answer.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    No. Why would a human with more processing room be able to solve problems faster than a human with less processing room?

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It would immediately be shut down after becoming racist like every other AI exposed to reality

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Retard

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    We can make a lot of paperclips.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://archived.moe/sci/thread/14515684/

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bunkerchan doesn't exist anymore retard

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    If we can design an AI, then the AI can probably design a smarter AI, which can then design a smarter AI, repeating until some kind of plateau or limit is reached.
    There's really no telling where this plateau or limit might be, whether or not this intelligence is willing to solve our problems for us, or what it might want, if anything.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >If we can design an AI
      you can't.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Each successive step in the ladder of self improving should be inherently more difficult, thus there are no grounds for believing that a self improving AI could quickly ascend to superintelligence.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        'Should' is not grounds for an argument.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >complains about lack of argument
          >presents no argument

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Let me rephrase his post then:
          Each successive step in the ladder of self improving is inherently more difficult, thus there are no grounds for believing that a self improving AI could quickly ascend to superintelligence.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        you're implying that the current software infrastructure we use is efficient, a really smart AI might rewrite the a completely arbitrary (to us) operation system and language that is multitudes faster than what we have right now. It could develop software that allows it to allocate all devices connected to the internet and turn them into one giant parallel processing machine. Stuff that is outside the scope of our ability to concieve too

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >then the AI can probably design a smarter AI
      defend this

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        They can't

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >If we can design an AI, then the AI can probably design a smarter AI
      That doesn't make sense. Stupid.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming it's goals are aligned with human values, which it almost certainly won't be, there isn't really a hard limit on what can be achieved.
    Narrow AI alone is expected to make unprecedented progress in everything from medicine, protein folding, material science, social science, you name it.If there's a dollar to be made by making a process better it'll happen.

    Too bad we'll all get turned into paperclips

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      can someone explain this paperclip meme to me? I've been under a rock.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It was part of a thought experiment, - imagine a superhumanly intelligent AI programed to accomplish a mundane goal (maximizing production of paperclips in this case), and how dangerous it could be if it did not have other set restrictions or limitations.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          that seems extremely unlikely to happen though. No scientist with common sense would overlook such a coding mishap.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >No scientist with common sense would overlook such a coding mishap.

            >scientist
            >common sense
            Pick one and only one. Reverse Savant Syndrome is fucking real, the amount of STEM graduates I've seen doing the most dumbass things as soon as it was NOT in their field of study is astonishing. Wisdom =/= Intelligence.
            >Taxonomist unironically calling me a pussy for not wanting to handle pure formaldehyde without proper PPE ; died 3 years later of cancer
            >Marine biology prom major ; an hero'd after getting cucked
            >Statistician getting married without a marriage contract ; divorce sent him living in a van only seeing his kids once every 2 weeks.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              does every other scientist get cucked? This unironically makes me not want to marry or trust women.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >does every other scientist get cucked?
                Accordingly to Jonathan Swift, he wrote about the inhabitants of the Laputa island to parody the Royal Society scientists. They used to get cucked all the time because they were so entranced in pseudo-scientific research while ignoring their wives. La puta means "the whore" in spanish, a language that Swift was familiarized with.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Accordingly to Jonathan Swift, he wrote about the inhabitants of the Laputa island to parody the Royal Society scientists. They used to get cucked all the time because they were so entranced in pseudo-scientific research
                Sounds to me like a big brain chad scientist back in the die cucked the fuck out of Swift, and he could only cope through his children's literature books.
                Read up a bit on it, and Swift sounds like the kind of guy who asked "when will we ever use this..?" in high school math classes.
                Based on his life story and the fact that he attended trinity college just based on social connections(brainlet parents lost all their money), he was brainmogged into oblivion and his ego never recovered. What happens when spoiled socialites go places beyond their intellectual capacity, they cope in shitty books.(Orwell is my favorite example of this)

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Royal Society
                Sir Isaac Newton (incel)
                Stephen Hawking (cucked gimpcel)
                Robert Hooke (truecel hunchback)
                Michael Faraday (cucked childless christiancel)
                Ramanujan (arranged marriage to a 10 year old girl, bad testicles, sickly overall, died at 32)
                Alan Turing (gay as fuck, roped when couldn't cope)
                Paul Dirac (Beta that married a single woman with 2 previous kids)

                Otherwise, members like Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Ernest Rutherford, Francis Crick, etc, were true chads.

                So a mixed bag.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Hawking cheated on his wife even when semi-disabled. Ultimate hound dog.
                People like Swift and Orwell are cowards, hiding behind their fantasy stories and plausible deniability of their ideas. Very effeminate in nature.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Sir Isaac Newton (incel)
                Volcel

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >>Statistician getting married without a marriage contract ; divorce sent him living in a van only seeing his kids once every 2 weeks.
              This is the most egregious, haha, he's a fucking statistician and he didn't knew about divorce-rape rates, lmao.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's not about overlooking some mishap, it's about having absolutely certainty that something like that won't happen. That's incredibly difficult to do, as evidenced by the fact that there still isn't any solid answer.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The evidence in developmental psychology is unanimous: humans develop through discrete stages of consciousness. We also have multiple intelligences that we grow through these levels in, such as cognitive intelligence, Kinaesthetic intelligence, emotional intelligence, spiritual intelligence, values intelligence, self development, growth in one's ideas of the good, and aesthetic intelligence.

    Trying to get a cognitively smart computer is the only thing book-smart AI researchers try and do. Any artificial intelligence must, like any intelligence, growth through stages of development.

    We also find that the same stages are recapitulated by all human cultures worldwide, and that it is impossible to skip a stage.

    One example of the growth of cultural values in a human being is
    •archaic
    •magic
    •mythic
    •rational
    •pluralistic
    •integral

    Any artificial intelligence that wants to outsmart the best minds on Earth will have to show the ability to operate in and then transcend each of these stages. Each has value, and none can be skipped.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >human level
    It would just be another human. We need a super human AI to solve those problems.

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its unknown, theoretically yes

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    You can solve all those by consulting me. Why would you choose death when it'd literally be easier to just fucking ask me?

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It would intentionally choose not to

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, because it will be limited by information generated by humans and technology developed by humans.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I have reason to believe it's not gonna be that simple.

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, computers only do what you tell them to do and no matter how many times you tell one to "cure cancer" it's just gonna give you a syntax error

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    true AI will never exist. consciousness is a gift from god. Chinese room proves AIgays are mentally ill schizos.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    deepminds take on a GAI:
    https://www.deepmind.com/blog/language-modelling-at-scale-gopher-ethical-considerations-and-retrieval
    basically try to use the same transformer for a bunch of different transformer tasks, and hope it learns some general stuff

Your email address will not be published.