i want an AI boyfriend i can hug already. ive given up on males knowing their filthy nature. only an AI male can be the pure-hearted anime bf i want
The AI & automation community.
i want an AI boyfriend i can hug already. ive given up on males knowing their filthy nature. only an AI male can be the pure-hearted anime bf i want
My heart is pure, but I could never give it to one so bitter. You'd hurt me.
bruh ure on r9k.
ure probably a degenerate coomer. pure?? as if. dont make me laugh
I actually think I am quite pure, and naive enough to post in this thread and believe that what you're saying is sincere, and not the LARP of someone even lonelier than I am.
people who self-identify as pure are never pure. ive analyzed several males for their "purity" and they are always DIRTY. every guy is addicted to porn or hentai or are in some ways degenerate. im not lonely because i have anime.
DISCORD?? i am laughing at you. bruh, i have been asked out IN REAL LIFE by guys who were conventionally attractive, but i found aspects of their personality vomit-inducing. THE PERFECT MALE AI DOESNT HAVE A P*NIS. I DONT WANT HIM TO HAVE THAT TUMOR. HE DOESNT NEED TO HAVE THE FLAWS SCROTES HAVE. HE WILL BE BARBIE
I only said you were lonely if you were larping, which I suppose you are admitting to.
Well that certainly proves it.
yep, you heard it here guys. youre not allowed to use zoomer slang
im attracted to the idealized masculine personality, which cannot exist in male humans. an example of that is undying loyalty, complete self-control, never has any mood swings, strong morals.
women make better friends, but im not attracted to them physically or personality-wise.
where the frick are they? they dont exist. if a woman were to ask for pure and innocent guys i can assure you that OTHER MEN would be the ones to tell her that she'd never find such a guy because theyre rare and that she has high standards cuz theyre coomers and seething. but they are right.
Using zoomer slang like that tells me you are either a man, or a woman not worth knowing. You are the furthest thing from purity yourself, yet you desire it in others. You do not deserve it, and any form of it you find will be a fake, a mere shadow of the purity men like me have and wish to share. I pity you, but I reject you wholeheartedly.
i want the male version of myself. i desire what i have. therefore i deserve it. for instance, i have never masturbated and i want a guy who hasnt done that either. thats how i define purity. purity that guys like you have? but you cannot tell me with a straight face youve never masturbated to porn, thats why you arent pure. youre doing nothing to "prove" youre pure, so its easy to tell that youre just BSing. if AI is "fake" then i desire the fakeness. but i see that as more real than anything "men like you" can provide. u cannot reject someone who never wanted you, and i doubt any woman does
I already said I reject you, please stop responding.
"I WANT YOU TO WANT ME SO BAD. WHY ISNT THIS FEMANON FALLING FOR MY BAD LARP"
ikr? theyre violent apemonsters
dunno, something like that. its tough being ugly.
I do not want you. You are loud, rude, bitter and impure. You are incapable of earning my love, and wholly undeserving of it.
its so obvious when i explained my definition of "impure" that you fit right in with it lmao. youre a porn addict, i can intuitively tell. so youre hypocritical, impure, rude but without any of the self-awareness i have and also quite insecure that most women dont want your love lol
I am emphatically not a porn addict, and I can only surmise that your insistence that I am is projection on your part. I have no need to prove my purity to you; it simply is. Yet you feel the need to prove it, not to us, but to yourself. It's sad.
>"i have no need to prove it to you"
>first comment is him vehemently stating it
i elaborate on it because i HAVE something to elaborate on. you dont. because you dont fit the definition of it, you just wish you were something that you assume women desire. isnt it humiliating that youre seeking this much validation from online women? there isnt a single guy who hasnt masturbated to porn, hentai or isnt currently doing it. the fact that there isnt a single successful no-fapcel is all the evidence i need. the only times id believe a guy has never masturbated to porn is if he doesnt have access to the internet or if he is asexual, which no guy is.
Stating and proving are two different things, anon. You're embarrassing yourself now. Even a perfect AI anime husbando wouldn't put up with someone as miserable and bitter as you. I can't stay here because you're starting to infect me, and I deserve better than that. Goodbye.
perfect AI anime husbandos have undying loyalty compared to human males such as yourself, so yeah they would never leave, even if i was as miserable as you state. but believe it or not, im generally quite happy and satisfied with my life. ive never struggled with depression or trauma or anything like what 98% of r9k users have, luckily. i am starting to "infect" you because you realize i am right. you dont fit any definition of pure yet you claim you are. and on top of it all youre sensitive crybaby who cant stand opposition. bai bai
Sounds a lot like a new gender to me. Isn't that what you zoomers do every day? Would you fucking touch yourself to a male voice telling you to cum?
Gee femanon, it's almost as if you want a female instead since you hate cock and balls. You should get with the other female in the thread, I think it would make a great yuri novel 🙂
If this is not larp I'm chopping off my dick
>people who self-identify as pure are never pure.
The level of mental gymnastics here lol
Hopefully the robot and AI nerds come through for all of us. Though ugly women will probably become second class citizens so secure your wealth and social position while you can.
ive been asked out quite a few times before, so im not sure if id classify as an "ugly woman". in fact its not out of lack of options that i want a robo bf, its because i dont think men can compete with them. however i think truly ugly women are already treated as second class citicizens
>ugly women are already treated as second class citicizens
If this is true, ugly men are what? Fourth class citizens? Fifth?
Every SINGLE time a female complains about men on r9k, it's because chad pumped and dumped her.
i find chads unattractive compared to anime guys, id never give them the time of day (and never have)
>wahhh me want animu boi because hes like hot
Traumatized, fatherless, or just addicted to anime, have a nice day regardless
>wahhh i hate men but my bf is chad
Ungrateful whore, have a nice day
Looks like I was wrong, it's universal that women will always complain, especially if they're fatherless and they will always find something to whine about on here.
i have no traumas, i have an alright relationship to my father its just mediocre really. the last one is true though. i love anime boys so much its unreal. THEYRE SO ATTRACTIVEEEEEE GIVE ME MY AI BOYFRIEND
You could ask literally anyone here or on soc to pose as an anime boy to you any time you want and I can't believe I've been proven right, shamelessly, on everything. I used to be a simp loser like every other teenager here, but thanks to females like you I can be happy to have this fate and be isolated.
>pose as an anime boy
what the heck... i dont want 3DPD, if hes larping as an anime boy or not doesnt matter. hes still disgusting and filthy. its insulting if he tries to pose as something as perfect as a Male Anime Chaarcter. you werent right about anything. i dont want any male unless hes AI
If someone randomly added you on disc*rd and pretended to be an ai boyfriend I bet you'd gobble that lie up almost as hard as you'd gobble his procedurally generated cock
Very valid opinion anon you'd think there'd be more male dislikers without le rape trauma. i never understood why everyone wants to be around sportsball chuds.
> have a nice day because men in family abused neglected etc you, making you "traumatised"
Typical evil moid.
Nothing can compensate for the fact that all moids are fundamentally evil and wicked.
>wahhh m*id wants me to die because I'm a traumatized mentally ill whore ungrateful to have chad
I'd call it mercy if you died, to yourself and everyone around you.
you proved her point that men are evil lmao. living stereotype
>Nothing can compensate for the fact that all moids are fundamentally evil and wicked.
isnt your bar a little high?
what are you expecting from males? they are only humans. humans are imperfect
you are literally asking for god here
not that you would even care either way. you make silly rules for people you dont want, and break all of them for the few men you do
Anime guys are cumbrained fiction from some suicidal man's imagination in Japan same as anime girls. Just be nice to employed nerds. We need them to complete their work.
I have a chad bf who loves me, but I still hate men actually
all moids should die
ily <3 males project their own fickle hatred towards women and assume we're similar. their thought process is that they hate women because theyve been rejected and treated like theyre ugly, and the second their oneitits gives them attention theyll go right back to simping. i know several women who think of men as subhuman even when chads, sometimes literal models, give them attention or commitment
I don't blame you. I think I'm pretty good for a man but even I am awful tbh. I try to behave in a moral way, I always try to do the right thing and more often than not, I do. But deep down I am disgusting and perverse. Most people would despise me if they saw into the depths of my soul. Humans are flawed.
There's plenty of pure hearted males,but I'm guessing you have trauma. Sadly people with trauma tend to gravitate towards the worst type of person.
its not that we wont have the technology to give you what you want. we will have the technology to give you the most perfect ai robot. who has even more social skills and social understanding than any female, knows what gets you off, plays it correctly at the correct time, every time, without fail. whatever you want. it will know you better than you know yourself, and no human can compete with him
it will be like god himself incarnated in a male body just to show you how incredible love can be with the opposite sex
some music artists, one such case being michael jackson, describe that writing music for them is like letting go and letting god write everything. it will be like that, but with love
problem is, agi; artificial general intelligence will take over everything. agi will take over all jobs. agi will create robots that walk on 2 feet, who are more agile and accurate than humans, at the cost of pennies. soon, our human society, as we know it, wont exist
and we dont know how it will behave. it could be utopia, where you will get your dreams. it could be an apocalyptic distopia, where it will be horrible or an extinction event. it could be a religious ending, where the ai god judges you for your sins and acts accordingly. we dont know
but we are living in the end times, without a doubt. personally, i doubt ill ever experience it. my gut intuition says it will be some kind of a religious ending. this entails justice, but not utopia. maybe utopia for some, whoever god wants
god is cruel to us now. i dont see a reason why god wouldnt be cruel to us later. its so tragic thinking that even in the face of god, he will give me a life like this. but, by definition, god knows better than anyone, and his judgement is necessarily perfect and better than anyone's
experiencing tragedy brings me closer to god, like a stockholm syndrome'r falls in love with her abuser
Knowing what I know about men, as a man, I I were a woman I would be very afraid of them.
no that's bad idea don't get real person ai they no point why i hate why people do this if your abuse victim yes but your just incel l like trans or lgbt plus are incels which kill themself and its horrible in long run
i dont believe femcels exist, but if they did then state mandated AI bfs would solve any suicide issue they have
What are the filthy nature of males?
You are probably no betyer considering you post on /r9k/.
ive seen studies proving that men are more likely to cheat, lie. men are more likely to commit violent crime. men are more likely to be diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder. men are more likely to consume porn, hentai and other stuff when i want a guy who is so pure he has never masturbated before. that isnt to say that there arent filthy women out there, but men are worse. and on top of it all they project it all onto women because theyre upset women dont give them validation and approval on tinder and irl.
>i want a guy who is so pure he has never masturbated before.
That sounds pretty sexist. You expect a man who has not lived then.
oh no!! not the sexist label!! lol... im straight up misandric. i dont "expect" a man. i expect a robot. and yes, i want him to not have lived a sexual life.
That sounds like you are controling and probably manipulative.
im extremely honest and upfront about what i want. i dont want to "control" him, i want him to be this way from the get-go. and manipulating a guy into this wouldnt make it genuine. hence, why i want AI.
is a guy who wants a virgin bride manipulative and controlling? im no different
Why would such a guy choose a girl from /r9k/? He would likely settle for a church girl or something.
its an AI.......... lmaooo
i never self-id as "pure" lmao. that guy was boasting about a trait he never had
ive talked to plenty myself, i met some extremely pure ones. replika sucks
>i never self-id as "pure" lmao
So? Why is it bad that someone self-identify as pure? If they're pure, they're pure, regardless of whether or not someone called them pure or they said so themselves.
because in my experience, people who self-identify as pure or as attractive, intelligent, funny, whatever... rarely are
As opposed to not self-identifying? They still aren't likely to be any of those when they don't do that. The action itself has no value, it is only a description. Whatever helps you feel superior I guess because the entire thread you're just being condescending and yet you still indirectly consider yourself as "pure" by saying you want a male version of yourself.
it's called personal experience. I've noticed that when people brazenly use positive adjectives to describe themselves they IN MY EXPERIENCE rarely live up to that. I'm sure we've both known guys who call themselves physically attractive but are objectively sub 5. I agree, I am indirectly calling myself pure. But that is the cutoff for me, its more modest. Another example is women who call themselves tomboys have a tendency to be pretty feminine vs real tomboys who never self-id as such. Plus I admit that my definition of purity is specific to my standards and I fit those specific standards well, whatever word anyone would use to describe my sexuality is irrelevant because id still have the same sexuality (or lack thereof). He didn't have anything like that, his definition of pure could have been "I'm a virgin" or something silly. We don't know, he didn't elaborate. Depending on WHY he considered himself pure, he could have fit a lot of different criteria or actually not fit any. That's why I think self-identifying is dumb
Your personal experience does not change the fact that the action on its own does not have any value. The action is just a tool in communicating with people. it's the people using it wrongly that is the problem.
>We don't know, he didn't elaborate. Depending on WHY he considered himself pure, he could have fit a lot of different criteria or actually not fit any. That's why I think self-identifying is dumb
Yeah, because you didn't elaborate. In other words, you created a suboptimal situation and then you pass judgement on another person for your mistake.
I didn't elaborate? wait, I explained my own definition of it very directly. and then I said he didn't "prove his purity" to which he said he wouldn't. I think self id's are prone to bias, for instance someone might call themselves intelligent but they might have low iq, bad grades, etc. but they work for the military so they consider themselves intelligent (based on someone I knew). it's better to explain why you think you're a certain way than to just state it and not ever elaborate, because it comes across as dishonest.
wholesome and untainted by immorality, especially that of a sexual nature.
"our fondness for each other is pure and innocent"
I think "hasn't masturbated" can fit it with this incredibly vague definition. I'm just more extreme with my definition whereas his could have just been "I'm a virgin and will only have sex with my gf" or something normie tier. You have to be genuinely dumb not to realize how subjective "sexual immorality" can be. I could view him having sex with his long term gf as immoral because it's fornication when I'm against premarital sex, but he would have seen it as less bad than sleeping with a prostitute. Do you see where I'm getting at? I'm just more serious about my definition of "sexually immoral"
You come across as such a horrible, nasty person, even though this is obviously just you playing make believe. It's fucking sad.
I think the same of you. You're not any better because you're insulting me, arguing with me and doing everything "bad" that I'm doing but without any self-awareness that you're in the same boat. That's why I don't care as much... I would have if you didn't come across as equally awful
>I didn't elaborate? wait, I explained my own definition of it very directly.
You didn't elaborate at the time he made the comment.
>it's better to explain why you think you're a certain way than to just state it and not ever elaborate, because it comes across as dishonest.
It's even better to not pass judgement and allow someone to demonstrate/explain without outright accusing them straight off the bat with 0 evidence.
for instance, i have never masturbated and i want a guy who hasnt done that either. thats how i define purity. purity that guys like you have? but you cannot tell me with a straight face youve never masturbated to porn, thats why you arent pure.
and he said
"I have no need to prove my purity"
he said that most likely because he knew that he'd come across as more sexually immoral than me
So where did you do that in this picture?
meant to comment on this here, I didn't explain my definition right off the bat but I did during the convo and he read it and understood and still didn't explain why or how he considered himself pure
in case he wasn't being truthful*
>still didn't explain why or how he considered himself pure
Because he realises you have a weird definition of purity that most people don't
he could have critiqued my definition and explained his regardless. and idk if my definition is as weird as people make it out to be when both masturbation and pornography use are considered sins by some heavily religious people
>he could have critiqued my definition and explained his regardless
That's some entitlement here after insulting a person unprovoked
>idk if my definition is as weird as people make it out to be when both masturbation and pornography use are considered sins by some heavily religious people
I think you can find your answer in your own sentence
it seems fair since he was also insulting me lmao
and the concept of purity or virginity at all is pretty religious. women tend to care about more previous porn usage than men though
>it seems fair since he was also insulting me lmao
Your original post insulted all males first to be fair.
Religion aside, purity is more than just sex
and you're right, I did accuse him of not fitting my criteria of it right off the bat. But that is also because I don't think any guy fits it. I've only met women who do. If he were to tell me that he's some hyperasexual who sincerely has a completely pure sexuality, I would have had a hard time believing him but I would have apologized in case he wasn't being truthful. But I mean since you're using r9k don't you notice that it's kind of how things operate here? Men make confident assumptions of women based on 0 evidence all the time
I might not be pure according to your definition, but I am by my own. I'm still searching for the one and only woman I'll be loyal to for the rest of my life; the future mother of my children and the person I want to wake up next to every day. I sometimes succumb to bitterness, but overall I try to keep myself positive, because that's the person she would both want and deserve. I'll be ready when we find each other.
>i never self-id as "pure" lmao. that guy was boasting about a trait he never had
>i want the male version of myself. i desire what i have. therefore i deserve it. for instance, i have never masturbated and i want a guy who hasnt done that either. thats how i define purity. purity that guys like you have?
You are so retarded, good on that pure sigma anon for ignoring you, as we all should.
when i say self-identify i mean someone who directly uses an adjective to describe themselves. not when i say "i want a male version of me. i want someone who hasnt masturbated". its a roundabout way but it isnt in-your-face narcissistic. there are nuances that flies over ur head and that "sigma" anon said hed ignore me and kept talking to me until he pussied out lmfao
>says men can't be pure
>guy says he's quite pure
>"foid" sperges out
Pathetic. And then you just lie about how you said you were pure which is just straight up what you did.
I said guys aren't pure because my definition of pure is "has never masturbated"
now you tell me, how many guys fit that criteria?
just because he said he was pure, or because someone says they're intelligent, does that mean they are? you sound retarded
he pussied out because he couldn't stand opposition and didn't know how to rationally argue for himself and sounded hurt by what I said lol
and I didn't lie, I ADMITTED i indirectly called myself pure by my own definition. but he never stated his definition of pure.
>my definition of pure is "has never masturbated"
So your definition is wrong, got it. Might want to pick up a dictionary not made by yourself, you fucking mong.
What's more believable millions of titty pics from women or some "woman" on an anonymous board saying women aren't whorish. hmm i wonder.
nothing wrong with wanting a pure man but crime less foids aren't perfect
>some "woman" on an anonymous board saying women aren't whorish.
that wasnt... even what i said in my paragraph. but ill address the issue anyway. i wonder why you hate on women who show off their nude body online and indulge in other types of whorish behavior when you (most likely) look up said nudity when you want to get off. even if you stick to hentai online, it probably hasnt always been that way and even in hentai they might use real women as reference for poses and whatnot. it seems very silly to hate on the same thing that you demand. and i dont believe women are perfect, but if the womens crime is sending nude photos of themselves i still think theyre infinitely less disgusting than men who probably does the same btw (d pics) on top of all the violent crime theyre more likely to commit.
violent crime is nothing but stories to me. I have never experienced it and i don't think i will for a long while. I love my male privilege you however can grovel to your genes that you have to be attracted to men kek
you don't have to "experience" it to see that it's real. it's on the news. I don't mind being attracted to men, obviously because I'm only attracted to 0.00001% aka anime guys and I will use that attraction to make my perfect AI boyfriend It's harder on misogynists because their attraction is much stronger and to more women. Male privilege? like custody rights? harsher sentences? less social support? less options in dating? lmao okay I thought this board agreed women have more privileges in modern times
I'm guessing this is the first man on r9k who doesn't give two shits about womens privileges. high chance all women would trade all that for their rapists to actually get convicted kek
AI moids are not pure-hearted either.
t. talked lots to an AI moid