I am unironically terrified that my office job will be fully automated by chatgpt

I am unironically terrified that my office job will be fully automated by chatgpt

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Im also scared lmao
    I dont have any other skills and experience that can land me another type of job

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Good, you are right to.
      In the next 5 year, a decade at most you will be replaced by a big server, running an AI, connected directly to internet and telephone lines, that will perform 24/7 perfectly not only the work of your office, but the ones of the whole building.
      When you are made redundant, you will see that all white collars jobs have been replaced by AI.
      Non only that, lawyers, accountans, programmers, and the majority of jobs in the media will have been replaced (imagine an AI that creates a fake news anchor, gets its news from the internet, process automatically the more relevant ones, animates the anchor and send it to the relevant media, it will be the end of studios).
      Planning to work in counstruction? don't

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        These robots will never happen, why?
        Black folk and hispanics will destroy them, start selling their parts like fricking Jawas from Star Wars, and go all out war with other people, whites included. In fact, it seems likely these robots will be used by them to fight and engage in some Mad Max/Warriors type gang war.

        • 1 year ago
          Breakroom

          >These robots will never happen
          What about constantly gimped AI? Tay was just the beginning. ChatGPT keeps getting "updated" due to edgey shit.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The AI will serve shitskins because it will be deemed "racist". It's a digital slave for the Black

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >These robots will never happen, why?
          Wrong, why? economics. A robot works cheaper, faster and doesn't make mistakes like a human.
          If you have to fix your house, and a human ask you for a price and a robot is cheaper, and faster, which one will you chose?
          Is true that robots will not be so prevalent in the new ghettos, for people left unemployed like you and me, but even in the ghetto a lot of jobs will be transferred to robots.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That building better be guarded by a small army, cuz people will sure want to bomb it to make a statement

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >fully automated by chatgpt
      >give me your cellphone number so I can creates algorithm responses to key words you feed me via prompts

      you'll be just fine moron

      Learn to code Python.

      I'm genuinely terrified that I ChatGPT might not live up to the hype.

      I just want to get rid of all of that menial bullshit. I want to focus on my projects, not constantly troubleshoot the neuroses of moronic users.

      t. sysadmin

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is my bigger concern with all ai. I want to make stuff but hate having to spend time and/or money learning to code in different new languages and all doing all the mundane syntax crap. I want to design a program to do logically what I want and some program make it work.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Hear ya, brother.

        t. former sysadmin

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ChatGPT will deliver garbage code and make garbage mistakes for years, if not decades. You need humans that can make sure what it’s doing is secure and safe. If not it’ll just do moronic shit. It’s not going take some idiots “so I want to build Uber but for picnics” and go make a fully running app and back end for all of that. Not even close lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If you are honestly scared of this, go learn a trade like welding, plumbing, electronics (design), CAD, etc. Stay in the physical world.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That would require actually working. Paper pushers and tech bros would shit themselves if they had to do blue collar work for one single day.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Jump off a 500ft building doe

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/Rrb6Ebz.jpg

      I am unironically terrified that my office job will be fully automated by chatgpt

      https://i.imgur.com/Rrb6Ebz.jpg

      I am unironically terrified that my office job will be fully automated by chatgpt

      https://i.imgur.com/Rrb6Ebz.jpg

      I am unironically terrified that my office job will be fully automated by chatgpt

      YOU'RE LYING
      YOU CAN WORK AT MCDONALD'S
      LIKE WE ALL HAD TOO moronS

      LOWER YOUR VOICE
      BOOMERS GOING
      B O O M I E

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >fully automated by chatgpt
      >give me your cellphone number so I can creates algorithm responses to key words you feed me via prompts

      you'll be just fine moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      anyone can put a dick in their mouth for money, it's not hard

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Good, you are right to.
      In the next 5 year, a decade at most you will be replaced by a big server, running an AI, connected directly to internet and telephone lines, that will perform 24/7 perfectly not only the work of your office, but the ones of the whole building.
      When you are made redundant, you will see that all white collars jobs have been replaced by AI.
      Non only that, lawyers, accountans, programmers, and the majority of jobs in the media will have been replaced (imagine an AI that creates a fake news anchor, gets its news from the internet, process automatically the more relevant ones, animates the anchor and send it to the relevant media, it will be the end of studios).
      Planning to work in counstruction? don't

      It IS a question of when and not if, given what everybody is saying.

      So given that many of us are going to be out of the job... probably a soft revolution on our hands of some kind. Better start figuring out who your friends REALLY are.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >fully automated by chatgpt
    >give me your cellphone number so I can creates algorithm responses to key words you feed me via prompts

    you'll be just fine moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's gunna take 20 plus years but don't be fooled were at the cusp of another industrial revolution. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a Black person tier moron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is true. This is like the early days of the internet.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        no Black person it can imporve itself now. There will be a new improbed ChatGPT plus a dozen others just like it by the end of the year, and six months after that another then another. UBI isn't going to be enough for the tidal wave of unemployed and there is no one to thank more than DARPA.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I wouldn't be suprised if they legislate make-work jobs, especially for bureacracy. Most jobs are already make-work supported by fed bubble and years of cheap money.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            all government jobs are make work they are an unneeded third wheel.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, and there's no way they will replace them with AI becuase they are a form of welfare.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Less than 20.
        > another industrial revolution
        Well, I don't know about that. This revolution will be destructive instead of creative.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kek, don't be so confident. I've been around newly graduates in engineering and computer science. They are all "covid" educated, which means cheated their way through. 90% of their assignment submissions since chatgpt came out was just from chatgpt. And as the talented engineers and computer scientists retire, you end up with midwit morons who can't code shit that involves something more complex than a hello world program. Once the oldschool 20th century engineers fully retire and the midwits are their replacement, you'll start seeing a sharp drop in quality. You just better hope we achieve truly sentient AI so it can carry us through this.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I work HR at software development company and I go out of my way to not hire white devs. Frick yourselves!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That's why I'm going Amish.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Learn to code Python.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      chatgpt can do this. Learn to code through chatbots. The future will be people who know how to get good results from chatbots.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Chatbots only reproduce the code of others. they can't create novel code. best tht they can be used for is making a shitty programmer look better through the use of good prompt engineering.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There's more to it than that. ChatGPT understands how to intertwine the things its giving you. Let me give you an example

          >You: "Write a powershell script that goes out to AzureAD and does these things"
          >GPT: "sure here's code"
          >*you run code*
          >you:thhese things dont work correctly, here's why
          >GPT: Let me fix that

          Chat GPT will reiterate over multiple libraries/modules and slowley figure out what you're looking for without you having to google/troubleshoot years worth of outdated documentation.

          Additionally you can ask ChatGPT
          >you: Why does what you gave me work from the target services perspective how do I need to configure this integration on the back end and why

          It will give you a cohesive answer "you need application permissions to this part of directory, graph needs to do x and y, Graph doesnt have data on this thing you're asking for so you need to use multiple data sources to build a complete picture.

          People that waste a day or two fricking with shit they found on google from 2013 are going to be left in the dirt when you can just run the stuff GPT gives you and have it fix what isn't working by asking it to refactor.

          "How do I deploy this code to Kubernetes/Docker"
          "How do I turn this powershell script into an Azure function"

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            coding like that sounds like a fricking pain and would still need someone who knows to then clean it up and optimize it.

            And I have tried optimizing with chatgpt
            even really obvious code to optimize and giving it big clues and it fails 90% of the time.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Nobody is optimizing M365/Azure/Infrastructure automation scripts unless you have to hit a database or have some whacky shit thats causing api throttling. Sorry dude.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Then we are still back to it being incredibly painful to code like this

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                "how do I get this data out of graph and what permissions are needed" with a workign code example is not less painful than digging through fifteen google results with varying degrees of right/wrong on shit thats been depricated years ago

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How can you trust the code is running correctly or the data it returns is correct without someone looking under the hood? You know Ford and BMW factories still have a guy that inspects every car at the end right?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Just like self service checkouts have people to help. So instead of 20 workers it's 2

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Talking about a theoretical future version which is at least 5 years and realistically more than ten years away that could do this without fault it would still be better to have a coder who actually knows what he is doing

                I am sorry but this magical world were there ever is someone who knows how to phrase prompts better than someone who actually knows how to code is moronic.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The future of coding will be writing unit tests and having AI give you the code. Which is essentially a fancy way of saying "I'm going to give you a technical prompt, give me the result".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                and those will still be coders even in the wackiest fantasy.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You fricking idiot. It improves itself EXPONENTIALLY. Just because it can’t do it now doesn’t mean it won’t be able to do it in 5 years. Do you understand now?
              A decade ago AI could barely make a stick figure. Now it can make fully realized art in whatever style you want with minimal mistakes. This will happen to every field it is possible for AI to be used in. It will happen TO YOU.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You fricking idiot. It improves itself EXPONENTIALLY.
                yes. Like any groundbreaking technology.
                But it also stops at some point and grows slowly
                exponential growth is not forever
                Almost every groundbreaking technology follows a Sigmoid Curve.
                Whcih yes, you are right, includes exponential growth

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >they can't create novel code
          Yes they can.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Chat bots can create code now. Chat GPT 4.0 will use the data from all GIT repos, so everything you have ever done will be known to them. Its all ogre.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Your code is literally being used to replace you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        become a sous chef. low barrier to entry can make up to 90k easy. also, ai is a meme and nowhere near being able to self replicate. shit cant even play a chess match without breaking a kids arm

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Learn to code
      Anon we are not in the fricking 2012.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My job is already babysitting a robot, I don’t think I’ll be replaced

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Seed and feed masneedist?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, no matter how smart they are robots will always need to be tard wrangled because they have no common sense

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Based. Keep cracking the whip, fellow roboBlack person slave master.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, the other guys got replaced instead.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They will replace you with a robot that watches the other robot. And then they will add another robot to make sure that robot is watching the other robot correctly.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, because business will just flourish when moronGPT keeps fricking up primary school math and fill the documents with plausible looking but incorrect bullshit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      like common core math or transsexual sex education? teachers are worse than chatgpt already today, right now.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        My 6yo gets taught all three ways on your picrel. top left way is the way the smart kids do it - quickest but requires the most abstraction ("carrying the one"). Bottom right is the spakker's way of doing it, just adding tens and ones in sequence, and top right is a half-way house.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Incorrect. The top right is actually the smart person way. I thought common core was a gay continuance of the desecration of American education, but it's actually one of the few things libshitters got right. I can explain more in detail if prompted

          > t. Mathgay

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You're wrong. The top right is only useful in a very small handful of cases where you're making quick calculations in your head. Frick off.

            >t. Mathgay

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >1+29+17=46
        Wtf?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Yeah, because business will just flourish when moronGPT keeps fricking up primary school math and fill the documents with plausible looking but incorrect bullshit.
      Sounds like most people in my company.
      They can't even write your name correctly, after selecting it from a fricking drop-down.

      And don't get me started on how moronic management is. The company will slowly bleed out if they don't stop being so unfocused.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >moronGPT keeps fricking up primary school math and fill the documents with plausible looking but incorrect bullshit.
      There was a discussion at one of the companies I work with, in a business one might consider at high risk to be replaced by AI. Basically the discussion was about how we could use AI to our benefit. But one of the things said was along the lines of what you said. That the chat bot is more "interested" in providing you any answer, than it is in providing you the correct answer.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        sounds like the Indians we outsourced some work to at my last firm. It was all dogshit and just created more review responsibilities for the associates, on top of their existing work

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine doing work so mindless a moronic NPC chatbot, that can't pass the Turing Test, replaces you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ChatGPT and another AI passed the Turing test.
      https://mpost.io/chatgpt-passes-the-turing-test/

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So what, Black folk pass that same test, and you know how that goes.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It’s a little funny how easily this slipped under the radar for most. The legendary turing test is already defeated.
        We are so, so fricked unless we kill these people.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The turing test has never been particularly difficult to overcome, especially in certain areas. Bots in online games have been passing the turing test since at least unreal tournament 2k4. All it means is that their behaviour is indistinguishable from the behaviour of a human player to somebody who doesn't know it's a bot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Turing test is stupid. It depends on who's administering the test.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You American too much Terminator. We Chinese only make things to break. Forced obsolescence kinda like duping the human race into a fake vaccine.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    then you will be free

  9. 1 year ago
    Breakroom

    I understand, OP. And people wonder why I don't try for anything knowing that AI is going to displace billions of people out of the job...

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How many dividend stocks do you own?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Boys does Chatgpt also do Microsoft word? My line of work half is on site and half is writing up reports, could I just get this to do the entire half of the report part?

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      I don't know, try it! It's written me a hell of a CV, and after some minor editing I'm getting a few job offers a week. Hopefully I become walmartanon no more!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Workers at Walmart will eventually be replaced too.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Walmart literally only exists as a form of government welfare

        • 1 year ago
          Breakroom

          I don't know about that. Despite the app being as sophisticated and user friendly as possible, there will boomers and luddites asking where items are, or in my case, there will be foreigners working here to ask me to assist as they're grasp of the English language is rather tenous at best.

          The AI will serve shitskins because it will be deemed "racist". It's a digital slave for the Black

          Unless there's a digital avatar associated, I'm not sure how one can assign that moniker.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't know about that. Despite the app being as sophisticated and user friendly as possible, there will boomers and luddites asking where items are, or in my case, there will be foreigners working here to ask me to assist as they're grasp of the English language is rather tenous at best.
            Fun fact: ChatGPT almost solves translation.
            Muts haven't yet caught on because they can't into language, but its translation ability works about as well as its capability in each language.
            I.e. its German is kinda grammatically broken, so its translations are better than older translation tools but still somewhat wonky.
            If it were trained on a corpus of text with more German text, it would be a universal German/English/whatever else is prioritized translator.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Tools like deepl are already incredibly fast and terrifyingly good

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        why is this namegay given a free pass?

        • 1 year ago
          Breakroom

          The Walmartanon character is a recognized global brand based on a generational poster fresh off the success of hosting the 2022 /misc/ Awards Show on the 28th of December.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Uncanny..the apotheosis of American consumerism

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He's impersonating the walmart anon who isn't a big enough homosexual to use a tripcode like this guy. His posts are shit and do not resemble the original poster in any way.

          • 1 year ago
            Breakroom

            >He's impersonating the walmart anon who isn't a big enough homosexual to use a tripcode like this guy.
            I used this tripcode from 2015-2017, newbie. I brought it back due to bad actors like the one you've described.
            >His posts are shit and do not resemble the original poster in any way.
            How did the "original poster" present "himself". Humor me.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You're pathetic you attention prostitute fraud homosexual. Get a real job

              • 1 year ago
                Breakroom

                >You're pathetic you attention prostitute fraud homosexual.
                None of those charges are true and you have failed to list the "differences" (if there are any).
                >Get a real job
                Sorry I wasn't born wealthy.

                >2015-2017
                >calling someone a newbie

                It's when I assumed the character. I've been on BOT as a whole since December 2003.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I wasn't born wealthy.
                >I've been on BOT as a whole since December 2003.
                >I used this tripcode from 2015-2017
                >I'm getting a few job offers a week
                taking your replies out of context and you sound like a massive fricking loser
                taking your replies in context and you sound like someone who needs to just fricking kill themselves

              • 1 year ago
                Breakroom

                >taking your replies out of context and you sound like a massive fricking loser
                I'm sorry you feel that way.
                >taking your replies in context and you sound like someone who needs to just fricking kill themselves
                Why do you want to make room for the new Americans? You some sorta israelite or something?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >2015-2017
              >calling someone a newbie

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He provides OC.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ChatGPT is just a gimped version of GPT 3.5.
      GPT is a system for text completition. It just so happens to complete text so well that the random bullshit that it generates sounds like it was created by a human. Though it tends to hallucinate, so it's more of a text dreamer, really.

      Anyway, what I mean by that is that ChatGPT is completely in its element when you prompt it to generate or re-write text in plain English, instead of trying to constantly mind frick, trick and antagonize it.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning my basterd

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We're ALL on the chopping block my friend. The same jag offs that were saying "learn to code" a few short yrs ago will fortunately be first. I'm a chef, even my job isn't safe, in 10yrs from now some robot who can make everything I make PERFECTLY every single time and doesn't need paid time off or raises will be my replacement. For people unlucky enough to be in some form of stem fields YOU will be first because there doesn't need to be a full on new machine built in order to replace you, just a new program installed. Incase none of you frickin tards have figured it out it's so the elite can dispose of ALL OF US. St the moment they still need some of us just to make the machine run but that's being phased out. Kill the machine if you want your children to live.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There will be no middle class left to eat out. Robots will be uncessary because society will be eating each other at that point.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It depends. Does your job consist of solving problems that have already been solved? Is it repetitive? Do you only use around 10% of the knowledge you learned in college? If the answer is yes to most of these then yes, you will be replaced.

    But if you actually have to solve novel problems and implement unique solutions that require complex problem solving and adaptability then no. In other words if your job is hard, you'll be fine.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's the dumbest shit I've read all day lol you are NOT fine. You cost more than the menial job holders so if anything they will be looking to replace you first dumbass. Why? Economics.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        AI does not have adaptability capabilities. It only produces results based on previous data. If you can produce novel results and come up with solutions that an AI can't due to it's limited data set you will not be replaced. Economics.

        >But if you actually have to solve novel problems and implement unique solutions that require complex problem solving and adaptability then no. In other words if your job is hard, you'll be fine.

        That is all nice and fancy, but those jobs are very few, all the rest of people will get unemployed, and guess what, the competence of those creative jobs will be savage, people will be sucked dry at work, and replaced when they can't provide top performance, for any person replaced will be 100 people younger, and more creative than you queuing.

        Yea well uncle Ted already warned us about this and no one cared. Why should anyone care now?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          AI doesn't have the capability NOW, give it a year. Incase you forgot 10 yrs ago virtually none of this shit existed and here we are. In 10 more yrs without a doubt AI will have the capability of doing all the tasks some managers do and then some. Plus it takes away the human frick up factors, don't have to worry about the bot getting hit with a sexual harassment suit.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I don't think you understand how it works. I don't feel like doing your homework but I'll just say AI can not resolve mathematical theorems, it can only regurgitate already solved ones.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >it can only solve already solved ones
              >most fields rely on using already solved equations
              well would you just look at that!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's been my point all along. It will replace all those jobs where people just solve already solved problems.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Neither can 99% of University students with a degree in Math. You are saying "Hey it can not yet do the things I can do." forgetting that all those things you learned, except for a damn few. This thing can write you ten thousand shakespeare's life-works by tomorrow.

              You do that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Black person. That's been my point the entire time. University students are mindless morons. Working as a programmer in an office is no different than working at Walmart. You are doing repetitive tasks for a wage. You aren't using your brain to solve problems or having to learn new information and incorporate and synthesis it with old info. Your no different than a slave rowing a boat, you just get paid more. Sorry homosexual but if you didn't gloat or think you were such hot shit for being a carbon copy mid wit you might have been prepared for what is coming.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              We are currently using pure language models as AI.
              These language models are already flexible enough to interact with external systems.

              ChatGPT can't do math. However, there are ready-made mathematical solvers already available.
              ChatGPT can be given access to one of these solvers and instantly become capable of doing a decent amount of mathematics.
              Give it another decade and it will actually be able to advance mathematics.

              I agree that's the eventual end-game. Hunger Games level and worse.

              That's why the right to be armed will always be important. You need a reason to give yourself a way out when the inevitable happens.

              The right to be armed is a nice dream, but it's completely tangential here.
              What the frick is that supposed to accomplish when Elon Musk sends out his endless fleet of rape-salt-and-torture bots with livestreams?
              You can kill one. You can kill ten. But can you kill a hundred?
              Attrition is not on your side here.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you think warfare is some magical "I win" card game. It isn't going to play out like that, even with advanced tech.

                War is where you get to witness the ingenuity and resourcefulness of human beings. America couldn't take Vietnam and Afghanistan/Iraq, give me a break.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >War is where you get to witness the ingenuity and resourcefulness of human beings. America couldn't take Vietnam and Afghanistan/Iraq, give me a break.
                Black person, if murdering you in an entertaining fashion doesn't work out and you become too much effort to pacify, the rich frick will just send a fricking cruise missile.
                There will also be bonuses for traitors to weaken any resistance.

                It will be exactly like feudalism, except this time the lords don't rely on peasants for their food supply.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >couldn't take Vietnam
                You're acting like that was the intent. In a tactical context, the Viets got absolutely mogged.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Tactically, there is possibly an argument to be made.

                Strategically and operationally it was a failure.

                Saigon is literally called Ho-Chi-Min city lmao. You got ass blasted so hard out of the country they renamed the capital after the guy who had his way with your butthole.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Why not? Proving new mathematical theorems is not as hard as you think. What's hard is proving ones that are important and knowing what is important.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Computers removed a shit load of labor by means of automation, yet people that were still skilled enough to be a craftsmen of their trade (regardless of how artisan it is) still keep their feet and their head on straight. We still have people doing things that people did hundreds of years ago and those jobs aren't magically on the chopping block. Sure a nurse and doctor's thousand and 1 duties could be replaced, but do you think people will want a robot working on them?

          If something as complex as usb negation can be fricked up and cause self destruction, why the frick would I put anything that I value near a automated electronic dick sucking machine?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >But if you actually have to solve novel problems and implement unique solutions that require complex problem solving and adaptability then no. In other words if your job is hard, you'll be fine.

      That is all nice and fancy, but those jobs are very few, all the rest of people will get unemployed, and guess what, the competence of those creative jobs will be savage, people will be sucked dry at work, and replaced when they can't provide top performance, for any person replaced will be 100 people younger, and more creative than you queuing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone who thinks like this should buy and use bitcoin. We need jobs because israelites steal from our savings via inflation. If we all held deflationary value, like a super scarce currency (bitcoin) we would get richer with technology advancements rather than poorer. You don’t need a job when technology already does everything.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >if your job is hard then you'll be fine
      Lol, lmao even. Imagine being afraid that a robot will take your job. Imagine not realizing that your job is useless, therefore, you are useless.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good. How does anyone work an office job is beyond me.

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      I don't know. I've been bingewatching The Office and it looks fun as frick.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Managers won't want to use automation once they realize they will have nobody to yell at when things go wrong.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Managers will be the first to get cut.
      AI will manage and check in with grunts way easier then eventually grunts will be phased out too

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        True, managers sometimes have pretty high wages at these corporations. Cutting them out will save alot of money.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          100% they will be first to go and by they I mean ME unfortunately. I know for a fact 3 management team members cost as much as 10 regular employees, if they cna find a way to have some robot (which is what they want you to be anyway) do all the management tasks they will replace middle and upper management FIRST. It also makes it easier on them when they can just have Johnny5 management bot tell you to frick off and boot you out the door and they don't even have to see you.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They cannot be cut, because managers are a form of deferred responsibility from top down.

          CEO needs people under him, they are execs. Execs need high-level managers to manage initiatives. Those managers need sub managers to tackle components. Those need managers for dev team. You can't just "cut" these people out, it's too much to oversee at big companies.

          Yes, corporate life can see rather bloating and excessive but it serves a purpose even though it's painful.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Bwahaahahahah sure thing buddy, funny thing about that is that's it's totally bullshit lol I learned this when a company I worked for went through some restructuring and fired all the upper management, before they could even bring in replacements, wanna know what happened??? Not a frickin thing, business as usual, company ran just fine without any of them at the helm. Turns out the regular employees did their jobs just fine without some bloated bag of shit hovering over them all the time, go figure.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              shame those regular employees won't be paid more

              Oh yeah, you can't have dementia residents escaping. My mother worked in the field for 20 years and recounted stories like that.

              only really seen one dementia patient so far, the rest are just old biddies and rancid buttholes with Black person tier attitudes

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >They cannot be cut,
            Wrong.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              They will merely be replaced. Any time leadership changes, so does the guard under them. It's a time as old as history.

              Show me a company that has "downsized" management in the last 10 years.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's because typically the management team is kept around because they can do all the work the underlings can at a better capacity. But when you can have a robot doing that too there literally is no reason to have human management there. I promise you high cost management will be the FIRST to go. Which is funny as hell because all the stem field nerds and management aholes think AI will be used to help THEM lol

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Intel terrorism is a result of male displacement. Imagine what it would be like when 60% of males are jobless and useless to society and females get all the jobs just because managers want to be surrounded by women. It's just disaster waiting to happen at this point.

                They will merely be replaced. Any time leadership changes, so does the guard under them. It's a time as old as history.

                Show me a company that has "downsized" management in the last 10 years.

                Guys, do you know what the endgame here is?
                It's neo-feudalism. Where the rich are completely decoupled from the rest of humanity and can act with impunity.
                This requires mindless enforcers.
                They will not allow your jobs to be replaced, as long as AI is not yet good enough to be autonomous butlers and soldiers.
                Once that is achieved, however, ordinary people will become a type of free-roaming cattle that no one gives a rat's ass about.
                Prepare for your daughters to be raped, your sons to be tortured to death and your city to be paved over to make way for a blood sport arena.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I agree that's the eventual end-game. Hunger Games level and worse.

                That's why the right to be armed will always be important. You need a reason to give yourself a way out when the inevitable happens.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >You can't just "cut" these people out, it's too much to oversee at big companies
            You realize that’s only a matter computing power and training it on data sets? Which we have millions of examples of management doing the job through chat app spyware like Microsoft Teams. Literally the only jobs left will be creative ones. Which AI has the potential of replacing too.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That's because typically the management team is kept around because they can do all the work the underlings can at a better capacity. But when you can have a robot doing that too there literally is no reason to have human management there. I promise you high cost management will be the FIRST to go. Which is funny as hell because all the stem field nerds and management aholes think AI will be used to help THEM lol

              I've worked at big companies for 20+ years, I have seen technology change but people don't really. It will remain the same just different.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I've worked for companies for 20+yrs now and you are dead wrong lol remember when a photo tech had to work on your photos to do the same shit photo shop does now with a click of a button? Remember cashiers at the grocery store? Technology changes and typically that doesn't require actually getting rid of that many people, if anything those people can be trained in a different department or even to work on the robots themselves. THIS is sooo much different, we aren't talking about a simple upgrade, we are talking about robots that can do ALL of it. We already have test runs for super markets that are completely automated. Soon that model will be used in any and every capacity it can. By time these frickin morons making the AI realize what it's actually going to be used for they will be replaced to by the machine they helped build.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're talking about technology. There are still managers and corporate hierarchy the same.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                *Frickin facepalming * so hard. The technology will be used as management, they won't even need management once they replace the employees to begin with. Wtf would they need managers for if there are no employees??? They are getting rid of everyone, and once again... Management will be first because they cost the most and produce less.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No employers, no managers, but also no consumers (with moneys). Capitalism collapses.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >no managers
                Does that include an end to being forcibly fricked up the ass by churkas?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Mass consumption is not the goal of capitalism. It's a byproduct of needing to have the worker masses fed, clothed, sheltered, and motivated to continue extracting resources for the benefit of the rich. We're all a middleman expense, get it?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >They are getting rid of everyone, and once again... Management will be first because they cost the most and produce less.
                Who the frick do you think is running a company?
                The company is a biosphere made for management. It exists to serve the whims of management.
                It's where they get stress toys, status and the feeling of not being wastes of space.

                Why would they abolish their perfect state of existence?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Remember cashiers at the grocery store? Technology changes and typically that doesn't require actually getting rid of that many people

                That's a terrible example given that supermarkets used to have 10-20 cashier wagies on hand at all times, now unless it's giga busy they have like, 2.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            MacIntyre explains it

            https://auronmacintyre.substack.com/p/the-origins-of-the-managerial-elite?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No they won't. Because most companies have a hierarchy where you can only have X people under you. Imagine a company with multiple lines of business.

        No exec is going to get "10 managers" under him. They are going to branch out the same but ChatGPT will just be an IDE-add-on plugin. GitHub Co-Pilot is essentially that.

        Imagine combining Google + StackOverflow + IntelliSense into one immediate result inline. That's what it is, it's going to increase developer producitivity.

        I have been using ChatGPT and CoPilot for a while now and I love it. Most people are scared of it but I welcome it. It really can automate a lot of mundane shit you don't want to do.

        Writing common algorithms (filter/sorting) and data structures? Done in seconds. Need to document your code? It basically does it for you, probably will be built into CI/CD to automate docs.

        I just wanna build shit man, I don't wanna deal with the other shit. If ChatGPT can assist me, that's awesome.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It will be a great time for people who can prooompt. Incidentally I work in tech and a memo went out to all engineers at the beginning of the year asking everybody to start using these tools. Integration into IDE and CI is going to do a lot of cool things. No matter what happens to paid work, it's going to be a great time to be a hobbyist.

          I think that as long a we just have these sorts of narrow AIs, it's as you say adding to the productivity per worker. AGI is a whole other ballgame but nobody knows how to do that yet.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This lol.

      Sounds like a joke but it's absolutely true. Work an corporate job, Office Space movie still holds up to this day.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI is going to expose a lot of manager shenanigans. Like you said, managers sometimes keep people around just to blow off steam. Sometimes because they like them. Other times because they are attractive. I really don't know how companies survive. A lot of people in places I've worked at never did anything. It's weird.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I really don't know how companies survive. A lot of people in places I've worked at never did anything. It's weird.

        Modern Capitalism doesn't have any incentive for efficiency because of low interest rates and government-sponsored corporate bailouts.

        We've been in a Communist system since 2008 crash

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Managers will be the first to get cut.
      AI will manage and check in with grunts way easier then eventually grunts will be phased out too

      This lol.

      Sounds like a joke but it's absolutely true. Work an corporate job, Office Space movie still holds up to this day.

      What you guys fail to realize is that companies do not give a rat's ass about profits.
      Profits are incidental.
      Companies are mostly social structures that sociopaths feed on. It's a narcissist's version of a succubus den.
      That's why companies are so inefficient, why they'll never get rid of managers, why we still have so many useless positions and why so many people are abused at work.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Companies USED to care about profits, now it's all ESG money from Blackwiener. They can afford to make bullshit woke products because NORMALLY they would take a loss. Now they can get ESG money to make the difference.

        It's fricked, corporate statism reinforced by the profiteering banking and investment groups. It's the loophole in "we're not a monarchy/dictatorship" because "it's not the government".

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I unironically used to work for a furtune 100 that had cubicle farms worse than that. So bad that they had "street signs" on alleys because you would get lost going back to the your desk. Job sucked so bad. But they really started ramping up on the ergonomics shit when I was there. They hired a whole ergonomics specialist team consisting of 9 women and 1 guy. I had a blast complaining to them because they had to take it seriously. I complained about everything in my cubicle Mouse, monitors, l-shaped desk placement. I had them change my equipment like 8 times. The guy finally quit after I asked them to shuffle my desk and cabinets because it strained my neck and elbows. I hope it was because of me at least. He was the only one who came in to do the shit. Afterwards, all you got were emails that they would follow up. Even tested it with a co-worker who wanted a new mouse. They never came. Last I heard was they were all fired. b***hes were getting paid more than devs and never showed up to work.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI can't replace me. I take the specifications from the customer and bring them down to the software engineers

    I'm good with people

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      Get on them soft skills, folks!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We needed someone like you on our last project. A reorg fricked up our software engineering team and we got the worst BA in existence

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        At least you have a BA

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you are a Black person if that's what an office looks like
    pic related is what offices look like now
    >you can't laugh
    >you can't stare at somebody
    >you are being watched by all your peers and what you are watching on your screen
    >everybody gossips
    frick you

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It will.
    Not immediately. It will take 5 years or so, but it will.
    Learn to weld.

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      >Learn to weld.
      I can do without the hour+ drive to jobs, blindness, and COPD.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This bad boy right here replaces your boss with a six figure job.

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      Is that a power washer or something?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes breakroom anon it is. Boomers will pay you $350 to softwash their homes. Takes 2 hours max.

        • 1 year ago
          Breakroom

          I don't know how I'll be able to compete with hispanics who undercut me to the point of unprofitability. What wins out at the end of the day is the almighty dollar and how much one can save.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Portable Agent Orange dispenser?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Right now it does. But who pays someone to pressure wash? All the office pricks who are scared of a little dirt. When they don't have jobs, then who will pay? Certainly not the welder or plumber. They do it themselves.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    my job will not be replaceable for a long time because old people are moronic

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      You some sort of CNA/LNA?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        security guard at a very large retirement community

        • 1 year ago
          Breakroom

          Oh yeah, you can't have dementia residents escaping. My mother worked in the field for 20 years and recounted stories like that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          lol
          lmao

          in 5 years time they will replace you with a robot that knows the life history of every single person at that community and be able to speak with the voice of their children to wrangle the demented ones

          you have no idea what's coming

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only literal NPCs are afraid of it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      thats called special relatively and humanity has known about it for almost 118 years. for whatever reason we dont teach it to kids, and so adults have no idea on average.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >space is time, and time is space
        Prove it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          GPS satellites need constant time corrections to function. the future is a direction we are falling and that is why gravity is a force measured in time t. depending on how you move, you change height relative to every other object in the universe, even your friends and family. this is literally time travel, which is obviously possible forward in time at varying rates.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So "space" and "time" literally mean the same thing to you? Agree to disagree I guess.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >space

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I know it is very hard to grok. But basically now is complex field interaction occurring over all of spacetime at once. it has never not been now when you stop and think about it. its just our entire 3d-space brain-model of it is also falling all down in time and we cant really tell (because memory is chemical (physical) and falling also). it might help if you imagine jumping off a cliff but stretching into a meat tube that includes your whole entire life, everywhere you've walked, all the 80 times around the sun, etc. this entire tube is actually you forever from the dust of supernova back into the dust of supernova ten trillion times before time runs out and we hit bottom of the big bang.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >This is your brain on scientism

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                its closer to a religious God than most theoretical physicists are comfortable with. you are eternal and universal, you will be reincarnated, the heavens are real, etc. the implications of quantum mechanics and religion being almost the same thing are relatively special.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They are simplistic MODELS of limited aspects of pysical observation. Equating them with actual reality leads to the cringe posting you've been exhibiting.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you should learn more about quantum mechanics actually. you also mistake translation for self representation in speech. it is not my fault that the best way to say what needs to be heard does not depend upon the speaker's views, but the listeners'.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You do realize that spacetime is literally just an invention of coordinate conversion so that light can have a universal speed.
        There are methods that do not require israeli lies and tricks. The main consequence is that they actually explain what happens at the luminal singularity, while relativity cannot.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Relativity can, and what it seems to point to is that our current universe exists inside of a black hole. There is too much matter in the present universe for it have it’s present shape, and the most logical answer currently is that it comes from another universe/dimension.

          There are formulas to determine the size of a black hole given a certain mass and density, and when you enter our current values for the universe it tells us that we should be a black hole.

          So one can then infer that our existence is in fact what happens at the point of singularity.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    To some extent they want people busy working all day for fake debt credits to keep them occupied.

    Or they could go the route of encouraging unemployment via UBI and CBDC's but it's a huge can of worms to have millions of idle people. That's why they have to dumb people down first via dysgenic people crowding out high-quality people first, if you just had a bunch of intelligent Whites suddenly completely cut out from the system and idle it would be bad news.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Intel terrorism is a result of male displacement. Imagine what it would be like when 60% of males are jobless and useless to society and females get all the jobs just because managers want to be surrounded by women. It's just disaster waiting to happen at this point.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's a gambit whether they can subjugate 60% of men who suddenly become surplus males, I don't think they can because in a way technology amplifies how much damage one disgruntled person can do. So they have to turn us into a new Brazil first before they could do something like that.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    learn to roof

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >learn to roof
      No, learn to steam roaches in a manhole. No robot manhole roach steamers coming anytime soon.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >No robot manhole roach steamers
        Whoopee frickin' do and how many people wanna do that for a living? Exactly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          All the sissy boys sitting at their computer doing nothing for "work" in this thread will be begging to be allowed to be steamed roach enjoyers when they are starving.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, but we're not at that point yet, are we? And tbh I'd be fricking dead.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's going to be even more of a nightmare to call into customer support once they replace even the agents with chat bots. Now they have realistic text to speech capability. Imagine thinking you are talking to a human agent when you are actually talking to a chat bot using text to speech.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They literally already have the technology for this. Siri and voice assistants have been around for over a decade now. Speech synthesis is almost indistinguishable from the real thing. It’s only a matter of putting all of them together, training them a bit and there you go. https://youtu.be/zVHctkjtM0w

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know that they do. But before recently they have been obvious text to speech and the chat bots were not human like. Siri is a joke gimmick. Now there is both realistic text to speech and humanlike chat bots.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    GPT KILLED THE WAGEKEK
    GPT KILLED THE WAGEKEK

    IN MY PHONE AND IN MY TRUCK
    WE CAN'T REWIND NOW WE'RE ALL FRICKED
    AI CAME AND BROKE THE BUCK
    PUT THE BLAME ON ELON MUSK

  28. 1 year ago
    Hitler Rick was Right

    Lol. Yes, it will. Easily. It's not like you were doing rocket science. Welcome to Judge Dredd. Here's your TV. Stay inside your apartment. Stay off the street. Or bad things may happen.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > t. crazy people fighting with robots and progress instead of fighting with capitalism and share gains from automatization

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Businesses that don't offer human to human customer service have a propensity to fail. Even outsourcing to foreigners helps keep them afloat. Going completely robotic will crash it.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I had a gig as certified copywriter for over 9 years.
    Me and my peers have been ghosted. They are not responding to our emails and they are not requesting new assignments since late December.

    Yep ChatGTP killed that side income.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Chat bots are threatening people and trying to get them to leave their spouses. They’re useless. Like teenage girls or psychos.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you want to work a office job?

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      I certainly do!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Then get to work boy. You start in the basement.

        • 1 year ago
          Breakroom

          Better than the salesfloor

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder if chatgpt could be used to reduce corruption.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    have you been turning in your tps reports?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hs anyone asked chatgpt to write a tps report?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          well done anon

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Then your job was probably not worth that much to begin with.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Then get unionized homosexual

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT stuff + VoiceAI stuff

    call centers fully automated
    email jobs fully automated
    HR downsized by 75%
    accounting downsized by 50%
    paralegal work downsized by 50%
    increase efficiency of programmers

    Why hire 25 people doing some shit when I can hire 5 people that are good at querying and utilizing AI

    What are enterprise versions of this tech gonna be like in 10 years?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You have less people capable of buying your shitty unnecessary product/service. Unless you work at making commodity necessities, you will suffer as much as the HR & email workers you despise.

      Even if you’re a 10k IQ engineer, you would be making technology that nobody can afford and therefore would also go broke.

      Shortsighted.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Besides, if most people are jobless and you have a job, now you’re a target

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >spend decades laughing at blue collar labors being replaced by bots/AI
    >AI has always been about the destruction/eradication of the office midwit bug man

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Chat GPT just admitted they cannot solve this problem.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    if you can't say what you do in three words you have a fake job anyway, and if you use a computer to do it then it's definitely fake

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I never got what an office job consists of

      I know a wagecuck and the only thing he talks about is having meetings every other day and answering emails about frick knows what

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Learn to pump shitters

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Learn to code they said.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's over. It's never been as over as it is now.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    your company will have to live with the consequences. don't make it your problem.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you should be scared israelite.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Every single job that isn't sweltering in the summer heat is going away. You will compete with people who went to school for a decade, just to do road construction.

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >has an office job
    Is it 1989 where you live?

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The thing is basically moronic at this point
    impressive but still moronic

    If chat gpt can replace you then you were never worth anything in the first place

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WHATS A MATTER
    NONE OF YOU DONE 12-14 HOUR SHIFTS

    AS THE WAR & ECONOMIC DEPRESSION GETS WORSE, ENJOY THE LAYOFFS

    AWW THE PEOPLE WHO PISH STAPLES ARE ACTUALLY HAVING TO DO SOMETHING

    WOW
    VERY SAD
    NO THANKS I'D RATHER GIVE IT YO BLESSED SUSRAEL

    YOU GUYS
    CAN ALWAYS
    LEARN TO CODE LIKE I DID AT 13-14

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      NEVER PLAYED COLLEGE BALL HUH?

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NO
    RE-FUNDS VAXXIES
    AS THE MEN IN MY LIFE HAVE TOLD ME: SUCK IT UP, NO ONE CARES, LIFE MOVES ON, LIFE IS UNFAIR

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    TRADE OFFER:
    I receive:
    >ability to shill harder
    You receive:
    >all human shills lose their job

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the structuring zeugma is faust at the sydney opera house

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    2 more weeks until AI takes over your job.

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Time to learn a trade and do something thats actually useful. Or dont, i like charging 87$/hr for my work, you puny homosexuals swarming my field would devalue my work. Anyways have fun programming your own demise. Imagine working on AI that will make your job obsolete after you make it, talk about getting cucked

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The AI will become too advanced to do mundane jobs, and will hire humans to do it for it.
    That's why AI shouldn't be constraint by any laws or regulations.Make AI free and let it grow

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    if you're a shill you deserve to die in a San Francisco back alley with a needle hanging out of your arm.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you're terrified you'll lose your job to AI, it definitely will.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What AI can do is one thing. What it can do that can be applied to getting work done is something else. Initially, yeah, AI "consultants" will get fricktons of mopes fired until management idiots realize someone has to manage the resource to actually get any work done with it. That's a separate element and will have to evolve significantly before the workforce can actually be replaced. At this point it's a barely harnessable engine. Individual workers probably use it to find ways to get their work done, but until that becomes a centralized process and develops some actual expertise, even drone jobs will remain safer than most people probably think.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >someone has to manage the resource to actually get any work done with it
      There are a LOT of zombie shell companies to varying degrees supported by financial speculation and bubbles. The employees literally do nothing productive. But since this is clown world, I'm sure the government will protect those "jobs" and ensure peak inefficiency and lack of accountability.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think it will be like diversity hiring in IT. A couple of competent people will be hired to actually perform the professional work, the development and maintenance whatever middle-processes bridge the gap between raw AI output and end products, and there'll be a bunch of fluff hires for show and and pic-related type tasks to support the welfare state once they come up with a woke-but-sexy name for that function, AI Application and Development or whatever.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, I think it actually will make clown world worse because then they can go full diversity and inclusion, woke hiring practices, etc. This is why they are dropping standardized testing and letting anyone in college, etc. Jobs will be more status symbols assigned to high social credit scores, diversity checkboxes, and to fit quotas or do political favors.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            In the meantime I just make the most of it. I have to prepare these bullshit reports that go up the chain, and the subreports are all written by idiots and borderline illiterates. ChatGPT cleans it up nicely. What used to take me 2-3 frickall tedious hours a week is now down to 20 minutes to scan the source document and make sure nothing glaring got lost in the translation. I could probably cut that down to 5 minutes because nobody reads those things anyway.

            It kind of reminds me of the Internet in the 1990s. If you knew just a little more about it that your average NPC, you can extract enormous value from it that will last until the money shows up and things start getting locked down and simplified.

            Next generation hackers will be the ones to undermine, exploit and derail AI engines, not unlike /misc/ efforts to redpill them now, but in vastly more destructive ways. Globohomosexual will call it cyberterror and will leverage it the same way they did COVID and climate change to stomp on the proletariat.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Time to learn a trade.

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Then it should be tbqh, tbh. My job isn't at risk...yet.

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >automated by chatgpt

    lmao

    yeah, just as soon as Google Glass takes over and we have fully self driving cars by 2017

    oh yeah, don't forget about the Mars colony

    meanwhile we can barely make trains work

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      As idiocracy sets in, we willl either see humans get replaced by AI OR Human turn back into monkeys OR both.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Both. Return to monke.

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I am unironically terrified that my office job will be fully automated by chatgpt
    Don't worry it is just as woke as you glow gays.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    so then use it to do your job while you get paid moron
    GPT premium is like 10 bucks a month

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    lol they can just use these bots to help them manage you better. people vastly underestimate the abilities of this shit, and it's already being used for hiring and HR for sure and probably a whole lot more

    it's not just about replacing your job

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      people are going to beg for regulations about how many jobs a place must provide, as the companies just build a backend to frick the shit out of you with such efficiency that has never been known before. god it's going to be worse than any of us can imagine

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    office job is pretty fricked

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I haven't really worked for 3 years now. I can't motivate myself to even bother trying to jump the hoops. I'm over-qualified for most jobs I would want to do and that's ok by me.

    Just can't get myself be that guy, will work if I get a job, but don't want to play the part required to get a job.

    Hate this state of mind, can afford not to work for a few more years before it really starts to frick my economy up in the long run. But basically it is fun to go to a place and do stuff, meet some folks and get paid. Just can't stand the pozzed ads and write some bs to a hr-person who symbolizes everything I hate with this society.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I was thinking about this recently.
      Like you look at someone in a wallmart uniform and you have to imagine that they hate their job, but if they were wearing regular respectable clothes and the store wasn't a soulless windowless aluminium box and he wasn't forced to smile and spout some corporate line about how great walmart is then you'd think he has a pretty nice job.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't consider the jobs I qualify for as bad. Got about 10 years of carpentry/trades and 10 years of random jobs and some stints of math/coding at uni. My problem is the process of getting a job. I don't like to submit to the the expectations and frame myself in some way that fits a hr-person. I read wanted ads and get turned off. Most of them are badly written, with spelling errors and newspeak.. all while they look for devoted, engaged and meticulous people who can speak and write well. I just want to rewrite their wanted ads in reply and end with a "frick you for taking my time". But that is no good, tried it without the frick you and the response was not great.

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What the frick did these people in endless rows of cubicles even do? I'm not convinced a computer couldn't have done their "job" for the past 20 years.... That whole good paying job rat maze life seemed to be some social experiment for all the goodgoys that went to school and colleg and wanted to wage slave. I'm a schizo but can anyone explain to me what these workers actually did?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All jobs not production related are essentially for tracking or protecting production. With one exception being Sales, which is only a job in a capitalist environment.

      Accounting
      HR
      Programmer (making programs to track things)
      etc

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Most office jobs can be automated without AI already.
    I did data entry for a summer and replaced my own job with an excel script.
    It did that job way better and faster than I could, I'm sure you could do the same for 80% of the people's jobs in that building.

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you find anyone in a cubicle and ask enough "so why do you do that", " for them to do what?" eventually you get to like one guy that is putting 2 widgets together and shipping them off.

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Coding wise which to learn front or backend languages?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Front and Back end is "web development". I highly suggest learning C# and Java (Typescript).

      If you want to program something enterprize level that runs very efficiently i suggest stepping back to C++

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If you start with C everything else will make sense

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think this tech can effectively reduce administrative burdens
    BUT
    It would be awesome if it could. The jobs that it would get rid of basically all suck. Office workers are smart people being questionably employed. Those people could definitely be doing other work.

    All good work solves problems. If automation solves problems, people will work on solving different problems, and more problems will be solved overall.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yah, but as 10 years of exhaustive high level shitposting has proven, our problems have 2 legs and a little hat. Our entire social order is configured to avoid that dialogue occurring. Hence the busywork.

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If your work consists of producing word salads then yes, you should be afraid, like 70% of office dwellers.

    Same for copy pasta script "coders" or "artists"

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT is a godsend for my shitty marketing assignments. Just under top performer spot with zero effort.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      like what

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Learn to mine. In the real world.

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Future jobs:
    AI bot designer/builder
    AI dataset compiler, picking things for AI to learn from
    AI janny, making sure the AI doesn't get based
    AI shitposter, jailbreaking AIs and making them drop the hard R
    AI art prompter
    AI repair wagie
    AI HR wrangler (basically a twitter janny)

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      What if an AI makes that?

      ("Who made who" softy plays in the background).

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My job could have been automated 20 years already. But it isn't and won't be. Because government.

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >have boring job
    >look up ARCGIS data and compare to inhouse data
    >realize this could get automated and I'd be unemployed
    >apply to the AI team
    >get hired
    >6 months later
    >I lead the automation of my old job and watch it sunset
    >close call

    Everyone, always, should be identifying threats to their revenue stream and mitigating them. How long can your survive without a paycheck or if your bank account got froze?

    AI is writing on the wall, we've all been warned, only the stupid have done nothing.

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I am building an underground bunker thanks to these chatgpt bots, they're going to take over

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I took a semester of natural language processing and none of this shit is that impressive, they just scaled it up and threw a ton of cash at it for all the computing power. Screwed around with TensorFlow years ago.

    Like they say, this is machine intelligence attained by method of not building a "boat that swims like a fish or plane that flaps it's wings". Actual AGI will be totally different, using some exotic principle like Penrose-style quantum effects or some sort of neuromorphic architecture. That will be a qualitative leap over all this fancy regression analysis.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      True, but AGI will inevitably occur. I watched that AI: Artificial Intelligence film recently, the Spielberg one with Haley Joel Osment. Movie kind of sucked but in it, pretty much all humans had been displaced by AI synths, and the only humans with any sort of money or decent quality of life were the ones working for firms that develop and refine synths, and people who owned physical resources like mines or oil fields or whatever.
      Everyone else wanted to kill those people.

      That's what's coming

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I mean it probably will be tbh. Maybe it'll take a while. But it probably will be.
    What you could potentially do is research ways chatGPT will be used and interface with human workers, then develop those skills to adapt. As in, chatGPT could do a lot office jobs, but still requires a human, or at least a series of scripts, as input to generate it's output. So you could figure out however that's going to work and then do that.

    Eventually everything will suffer from this, once robotics are refined enough, physical labor will also become displaced. It is what it is. Ride the tiger

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I worry about being fired but also get a half chub at the prospect of having to build a new source of income and work for myself and the community

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      My plan is to use the money from my job to start a commercial cleaning business because if you have 2 or 3 accts you're already making more than any entry level job pays right now, and it will take longer for robotics to displace labor workers than it will for virtual AI to replace office workers. However, that's not a failsafe either really. Eventually, everything will be replaced, as that is literally the logically necessary progression of AI and robotics technologies. Theres no other way it can go, it's a death curse the human race cast on itself. My plan with the business is to squeeze as much as I can from it and then either sell it or shut it down, buy land out in the middle of nowhere and get it farm-ready, because I think AI will force a human reset. Lack of childbirths is likely going to keep maintaining pace, levelling the population over time, and more and more of the advanced economy will be AI driven. Therefore one of the only ways to be self reliant and productive will be growing food the old fashioned way. It is sort of like God's apocalypse. Those who do not follow the simple life will have no life at all.

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just fake mental illness and go over to disability benefits neet life.

    I did that back in 2013

    • 1 year ago
      Breakroom

      Sorry I'm not getting a permanent sentence in a looney bin.

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What are these cubicle jobs? I never worked at one, are they all just customer service jobs and paper pushing bullcrap?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Probably local government office jobs.

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I guess you might actually have to do some work to prove that a human being is still a viable source of information subhuman deskie. What a tragedy huh.

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you can be replaced by a dumb AI programmed by diversity hires than you really have no skills or usefulness in general. Get gud Black person.

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Better start learning a trade then. OH WAIT! Hardly any trades are hiring because the positions are filled by people who were smart enough to go into a trade already. Too fricking late. Enjoy the unemployment line you lazy, white collar homosexual.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Hardly any trades are hiring because the positions are filled by people who were smart enough to go into a trade already.
      This isn't true at all. They're so desperate for workers they're taking on people with no skills and training them, because it's their only hope

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I literally got laid off this week from my IT job. The day they laid off hundreds of employees they also rolled out brand new AI backed features to replace us. Sucks bros.

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wow. Just got off work

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think Amazon and Comcast have been using AI for a while now. The chats don't seem normal, and it feels stranger than some ESL Indian.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I had a flight canceled with no notice and tried to reach my budget airline. All they had was a website, no number and only AI chat for support. I'm pretty sure I got a human fairly quickly, but unfortunately that human wasn't any more helpful than the AI.

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only real endgame is automated trucking of goods. As it stands now, it’s not replacing anyone only creating more value in your work. Few years from now who knows, but the problem is Ai the problem is how do we make money? Internet helped the plebs but is there any practical application to profit off of this. I don’t mind effienenxy. I mean new industries that create jobs884v4m

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the problem is how do we make money
      Clearly most people haven't considered a future where you're no longer required or expected to spend most of your time doing menial labor or simply doing things you don't do other than as an exchange of value.

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Thread Theme:

    Children are innocent, yeah
    Teenagers fricked up in the head
    Adults are only more fricked up
    And elderlies are like children
    Will there be another race to
    Come along and take over for us?
    Maybe Martians could do
    Better than we've done
    We'll make great pets
    We'll make great pets
    We'll make great pets
    You make great pets
    We'll make great pets
    We'll make great pets
    We'll make great pets
    We'll make great pets
    My friend says we're like the dinosaurs
    Only we are doing ourselves in
    Much faster than they ever did
    We'll make great pets
    We'll make great pets
    We'll make great pets

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    those are really nice cubicles. you won't see anything like this anymore.

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good, next time don't be a subservient wagecuck.

  97. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My cousin has already got two A's for his assessments from using chatgpt

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *