Can IA replicate unique drawnings like shadman or other creators? All i see is some 2D generic shit that can be spot from a mile away, it's boring as fuck
At the moment it can't displace very much real work, but might be an assistive tool. The issue is that it can't handle anything like the size of abstract model that a human can, and doesn't have the reasoning power. It's also really quite expensive, especially during the training phase. So it will ace fizzbuzz and other small stuff, but fall apart on a real codebase where a lot more specialized memory and learning is required. It can't go deep.
CE and EE aren't too different to programming in this respect, despite using different languages and models. Oh, and different costs of failure (outside of simulation) than software usually has. They're all things that require plenty of deep knowledge. (I work at a site that does hardware-software co-design, and I'm aware what the differences are.)
> The issue is that it can't handle anything like the size of abstract model that a human can
Yeah. I see people saying it's replacing programmers but give it something as simple as using a library and it falls flat on its face. Sure it will learn with time but something it can never learn is >and doesn't have the reasoning power
It's a machine. Always was and always will be. It will do its thing to get to the result and nothing else. It will never give any consideration to anything out of its scope.
If nothing else I for one welcome out new AI tool so I don't have to scrape the depths of the internet to find a crappy implementation of some algorithm or how to get the right components in place for a PCB or how to implement some weird communication protocol.
Let's hope the schools see this advancement and adjust accordingly.
>EE
i work with the local diploma mill, all the smartass EE students are using ChatGPT to write their papers and code. it fucking understands the obscure dialect of 68HC11 assembly we're using and the based retard students are using it to do their entire embedded programming course in an afternoon
Why don't you ask in one of the ~50 other AI threads?
They're all about CS anon
it has already been used for almost a decade in quantum physics learning and math learning. You tell me. (which both are part of your above)
Can IA replicate unique drawnings like shadman or other creators? All i see is some 2D generic shit that can be spot from a mile away, it's boring as fuck
It tries to imitate shadman to an extent but it isn't there. The soul isn't there, it just isn't. Shadman was more than pinups
since his website has been down for a while, is there any archive?
It's all on ex
what's ex?
The panda
Spoonfeed me please, can't find it.
wikipedia sad panda
next time lurk more
Do we even know definietly what happened to the guy ?
Did drugs and went to prison
https://www.insider.com/shadman-shaddai-prejean-arrested-los-angeles-speculation-twitter-post-2021-11
At the moment it can't displace very much real work, but might be an assistive tool. The issue is that it can't handle anything like the size of abstract model that a human can, and doesn't have the reasoning power. It's also really quite expensive, especially during the training phase. So it will ace fizzbuzz and other small stuff, but fall apart on a real codebase where a lot more specialized memory and learning is required. It can't go deep.
CE and EE aren't too different to programming in this respect, despite using different languages and models. Oh, and different costs of failure (outside of simulation) than software usually has. They're all things that require plenty of deep knowledge. (I work at a site that does hardware-software co-design, and I'm aware what the differences are.)
Interesting, what do you mean by deep knowledge?
> The issue is that it can't handle anything like the size of abstract model that a human can
Yeah. I see people saying it's replacing programmers but give it something as simple as using a library and it falls flat on its face. Sure it will learn with time but something it can never learn is
>and doesn't have the reasoning power
It's a machine. Always was and always will be. It will do its thing to get to the result and nothing else. It will never give any consideration to anything out of its scope.
If nothing else I for one welcome out new AI tool so I don't have to scrape the depths of the internet to find a crappy implementation of some algorithm or how to get the right components in place for a PCB or how to implement some weird communication protocol.
Let's hope the schools see this advancement and adjust accordingly.
All Slavs will be out of work
Since the past 2 decades or so, almost all EE work was focused on getting a signal into a processor and running software on it.
90% of the analog work is either already figured out like power electronics, or done by galaxybrained PhDs like telco stuff.
>Be a brainlet retard
>Pick telecoms as my major
I wish someone had warned me, worst mistake of my life
Both versions of Gitlab will still be available regardless of AI
>shaidman
>EE
i work with the local diploma mill, all the smartass EE students are using ChatGPT to write their papers and code. it fucking understands the obscure dialect of 68HC11 assembly we're using and the based retard students are using it to do their entire embedded programming course in an afternoon
Anon you're so full of shit
The future is now, old man.
You're still full of shit, post prompt
if you want their prompts go ask them yourself, moron, because i dont have them
Ain't that convenient? Ask who cunt?
abdul