how likely is it that our "universe" is existing for a higher type civilization that needs our AI to make theirs more complete and then they...

how likely is it that our "universe" is existing for a higher type civilization that needs our AI to make theirs more complete and then they just black hole our universe(delete us)?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    for our AI to have better results than theirs would need to have an extraordinary amounts of parameters and computing power, which for the higher civilizational beings controlling us has been already achieved, otherwise they wouldnt be able to create our simulation

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i feel like if they could make fake people capable of making an AI they could make an AI as intelligent as one of the people in the simulation

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The whole idea of our world being just a simulation is completely moronic. Not only is it somewhat of a logic loop that cannot be broken without actually observing the damn thing in the first place (if this reality is a simulation, then what about the reality running our simulation? Can't it be a simulation as well? And on and on and on... When do you get to prime reality, homosexual?), but you're also acting as if multiple layers of simulations will be completely accurate. A problem-subspace cannot be the same size as the problem-space it's a part of, otherwise it is the primary problem-space in the first place. That means your subspace can only be a cheap imitation of your problem-space, and has to be aproximated. Which means it loses definition. And the more you drop down into multiple layers of simulations, the more your simulation is aproximated (aka is composed of less and less data and rules), until things either look like a mockery of your reality, or the simulation completely breaks and is unsustainable.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And before you start telling me that "oh but we were talking about alternate realities, not simulations on a CPU, homosexual".... an alternate reality, even one represented as a "pocket reality" is a simulation in itself. You are using energy, matter, data from your reality to create something that can only be a subrange / subspace of your reality.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You are assuming that the resources available to the entity simulating you are the same resources available to you. How dk you reach that conclusion? It's just chauvinism like 1000 years ago "nooo human/sun/earth special"

        The only thing every animal is is a continuation of breeding numbers. Of applying universal darwinism. Exclusively through maths.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      70IQ

      You can't get to prime reality just like a computer program can't exit the computer. If God does not exist math would not hold true (specifically universal darwinism specifically darwinism applying to mathematics)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Who said anything about getting to prime reality, dumbass?

        You are assuming that the resources available to the entity simulating you are the same resources available to you. How dk you reach that conclusion? It's just chauvinism like 1000 years ago "nooo human/sun/earth special"

        The only thing every animal is is a continuation of breeding numbers. Of applying universal darwinism. Exclusively through maths.

        I have... never said that? Do you know the difference between a problem space and a the subspace of a problem? Or are you just pulling things out of your ass now trying to accuse me of things I never said just so you could continue a conversation?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The Universe is confirmed to be a 2d hologram upscaled into 3d. Do you deny this?

          Bunching random numbers at each other for trillions of years and following Darwin rules eventually gives humans and other intelligent creatures. Do you deny this?

          This world is literally just one big genetic/evolutionary algorithm.

          Everyone disagreeing is stuck in 1400s "muh human muh sun muh earth special"

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Confirmed by whom? By the source being your butthole? Why don't you just frick off back to plebbit, at the speed of soience, and jerk off over moronic concepts that only exist in voids and have no connection with reality.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why does math working require the existence of God?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          A God is possible, just not the Abrahamic one.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    100%

    Simulation theory (the theory that the universe is a flat 2d surface upscaled into 3d just like a hologram) has been proven years ago.

    The fact that you can throw random numbers at each other for trillion years and get high intelligent agents is another part.

    What cultures define as God is the thing that allows math to "work" for our universe. Which in turn negates any religion calling any other religion wrong. Nothing exists besides math.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >*tips fedora and orders another bigmac*

      You forgot to account for the fact that math itself is not 100% provable and that, at some point mathematical theorems are based as much on faith as they are on belief. Math is not the ultimate proof of anything. Goedel would like to smack your ass around for being a bad little fat atheist plebbitor.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I should have clarified for the 50 IQs. Math is the way we humans interact with the world. It's only natural that a tool developed by us to describe something can not catch all of it correctly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You keep acting as if other people are dumb and you're some kind of genius, but then you say shit like "math is a tool developed by us". No, you dumb frick... mathematics is an inherent property of reality, a set of patterns present throughout reality to be more exact, that can be aproximated (usually badly) through our systems of communication. Math is not invented, it's discovered. And there's a point where, while observing these patterns, you get to the conclusion that mathematics (being a property of reality itself) cannot possibly be used to describe the entirety of reality... just like Goedel did. At some point your theorems cannot be proven and you have to just use them based on your faith that they work (and are valid) and won't screw up everything you've built in the future.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's more likely that our universe was spawned as a complete thing and conciousness is the projection. Your animation through the pages of time isn't as important as your conciousness through time. The universe is solid state, and your conciousness is fluid. This IS how it is, and if I made my findings public, it'd change the world. Just so happens that I find all of you insufferable, and I don't care about further progression. Also, All conciousness is one, and I'm just the part that says frick you, as a balance.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Dark holes are a likely indicator of simulation.

    Dark holes lower entropy violating thermodynamics.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We are all living in a simulation

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *