How do you check if an information is true or fake these days? It could be an ad, gpt slop, fake study...

How do you check if an information is true or fake these days?

It could be an ad, gpt slop, fake study...

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Empirical evidence. If you didn't take meds ever you simply cannot talk about damage they do because you are talking out of your ass and don't even know what meds do.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    by choosing a reliable source of course :^)

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Everything is false. Truth doesn't matter what you're looking for is a common truth or else you'd be an outcast.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hmm depends
    >politics
    all fake
    >technology
    all fake or opinions
    >anything regarding business, products or something that has to do with money
    all fake
    >anything posted on socials
    all fake
    >anything written on any newspaper
    all fake
    An information could be true if the stakes/money are too low for someone to bother lying
    In general anything you read on wikipedia regarding scientific facts or past events could be assumed accurate until further evidence proves the contrary

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > or past events could be assumed accurate until further evidence

      Western state propaganda is allowed and considered reliable by Wikipedia despite its strong bias, deliberate inacurracy and compulsive lying

      State media from countries that are hated by the West are not allowed by Wikipedia for being biased and not truthful despite being objectively more accurate and factual than Western state media

      Wikipedia admins said they don't care about reliable sources because their goal is to manufacture consent for the West

      Wikipedia gloats about pushing hoaxes by having a page in which they list all of the hoaxes that they were forced to take down only because social media users exposed them and attracted too many readers

      Wikipedia admins said their main audience is US teenagers and they want US teenagers to have a far limited magination or achieve an autistic mind so they can justify inventing a new term for anything e.g. ten apples in a glass basket should have its own term, a Muslim who is 175.5838438 cm tall should have its own term, etc

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Are you the same schizo who said that China and Japan are both controlled by israelites?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Are you the same schizo who pretends to be Japanese and denies basic facts about Japan and China?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >In general anything you read on wikipedia regarding scientific facts or past events could be assumed accurate until further evidence proves the contrary
      Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger:
      >Wikipedia can be counted on to cover not just political figures, but political issues as well from a liberal-left point of view.
      >So when the Establishment (or maybe just the Establishment left) is unified on a certain view of a scientific controversy, then that is the view that is taken for granted, and often aggressively asserted, by Wikipedia.
      https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >In general anything you read on wikipedia regarding scientific facts or past events could be assumed accurate until further evidence proves the contrary
      To add to this, last I checked, Wikipedia only allows secondary sources (which is moronic), so while scientific topics are mostly safe, it's always good to either double check the math and/or check out the linked source(s)

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just assume everything is fake.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bullshit always has a certain tone..

    They waste words saying a lot.of nothing. Once you pick up on it you can smell a lie anywhere.

    As soon as you read some idiots obviously personal opinion on anything it is clearly emotional bullshit.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so how come noone cares about things I say?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Smol penis?

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Placebomaxx
    You can find a source for anything these days so literally just pick one to believe and it will become as true as possible.
    I recently decided that grounding works and it cured my wrist pain. My orgones have never been so positively charged.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i assume information is true, not going to drive to see myself

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the only real things are things that happen in the physical world around me. everything else is fake.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anything the West says about Aryans is always going to be fake

    Let's hope Aryans plug the Perso Gulf and God-fearing Yemenis plug the Red Sea

    Imagine the fricking seethe when Westerners can't power up a dildo or get the latest dildo from China

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you don't have built-in discernment whether things are true or false on the internet without few more seconds of thinking then you're a fricking low IQ NPC. Simple as.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    unless this information came to me via a dream, I don't trust it.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Basically, if mainstream media say it's true, then I know it's false.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just assume everything is fake and everyone is gay

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If it doesn't come from the state, then, it is presumed false. Simple as.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You present the LLM with the information, but gaslight it into believing it wrote it, then you ask if it's correct. If it does not have internet search capabilities, it's your job to fill that role.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You look for primary sources and papers that describe how to recreate the outcome. There's a bunch of factors to consider when looking at the source,
    >funding
    >author
    >sample size
    >peer review
    >reproducibility

    For example, if it's funded by Israel or a israelite (like Zuckerberg) then it's propaganda.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Basically mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, and anyone suggesting otherwise is wrong.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    By having a good education when I was younger, exclusively reading books written by people who have been dead for at least 100 years, and by using the dialectic and not being a spastic moron.

  20. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If you haven't had at least 5 COVID-19 vaccines then you are antivaxxer nonsense maker. It's just that simple!

  21. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I just choose to believe whatever I want to believe. So does everyone else. Ignore the ones with different ideas and plot to kill them. Humanity 101 sheesh fr

  22. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I use the /misc/ method
    If the author is gold/berg/stein: Fake
    If I don't understand the article: Fake
    If the article contradicts my beliefs: Fake
    If an article confirms my beliefs or makes me feel smart or special: It's genuine

  23. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Take the red pill and accept that anecdotes are more reliable than "studies". Studies are only for arguing with others and they are generalized. Your personal experience takes into account all of your circumstances that studies don't do so anecdotal evidence reflects the real world more accurately for you and what you should believe in to improve your life.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *