How do I profit from ai replacing human creativity?

How do I profit from ai replacing human creativity?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Short my butt

    • 2 years ago
      WSB

      I'm about to Long this anon's (female) butt.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Post butt

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Short disney probably.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not bad, they make better music than most popular shit today too

      Good call

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        zamn, that went hard

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bad call, as soon as it actually becomes economically viable to use AI for this, Disney will just fire all their draw-slaves and exploit their trademarked characters at an even better margin.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That pedo company won’t last forever
        Eventually everyone will refuse to show their kids subliminal sex in cartoon form

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          ok, have fun staying poor

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Buying Disney stonk is moron level
            They bleed that company for the executives
            Not shareholders

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yeah it's gonna be interesting.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Buy shares in prozac and rope.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    w2c dem new kicks? fr

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    both look like shit, fashion industry went to shit a long time ago.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >moron misses the point

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >DA HECKING AI WILL REPLACE HUMANS!!!! JUST LIKE MY Hollywood HECKING MOVIES!!!!
        There is no point.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >AI can design garbage no one wants in 3 seconds
        He didn't miss anything

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This. No one except a certain 13% demographic would wear the AI created shoes. Both are shit though. Footwear doesn’t need to be creative. It’s already been perfected. A brown boot.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The prompt for the ai generated one was making a shoe design crossed from cuttlefish patterns and stained glass and it created a render in 3 seconds. A human could never create a design that quickly. And we are in the beginning stages of ai being able to design. What do you think it will look like in 10 years? Humans will lose their creativity.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              AI has already been used for a decade to design PCB layouts. A rendered image is not a manufacturing process. It's also not a printer that can print arbitrary designs.
              Because those are basically impossible, the physical space is much more unforgiving than just manipulating image pixels.

              Right now AI advances just mean spambots and shills will get increasingly annoying.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              yawn
              let me know when it generates usable topology I can actually work with...

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >let me know when it generates usable topology I can actually work with...
                couple years, depends on how quick shoe design companies find a way to "borrow" peoples designs for training data to train a cyclegan

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                If AI can create topology that isn't fricked then I will actually kneel before Roko's Basilisk

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >It’s already been perfected
            No it hasn't. Shoes overall are too narrow and cause foot issues. Now if AI designed (of its own accord) "barefoot" shoes that are actually better for us as humans I would pay attention - and given how racist it is (because of what it has read) etc this will surely come. Unless stopped it tends to tell the "truth".

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          guarantee you that millions of low IQ 13-22 year old mulattoes are drooling over those hideous shoes

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        i think you miss the point of what art is. its an expression of human emotion.
        ai can imitate art but it cant create it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah but there’s enough human output and AI improvements for them to imitate art better than 99% of humans

          What people like this don’t get is how bad AI was 10 years ago and how far we will be in another 10-25 years

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            its still not created from a particular feeling. there is no transfer from mind to the physical realm.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's not art, that design and illustration.
          HUGE difference

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >that
            * that is

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >i think you miss the point of what art is. its an expression of human emotion.
          >ai can imitate art but it cant create it.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The human one is better and more practical. The AI one is a mess.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Realistically speaking, AI will simply be used to supplement human creativity. The job of the human will be picking and altering the base dataset , and then picking the best final designs AI comes up with. Theres definitely money to be made from this, but you gotta get deeper into the industry for specifics.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >AI will simply be used to supplement human creativity
      This is surely needed in Asia. They are all disgusting races of conformists.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit I want those AI shoes
    >bullish signal

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Zoomer detected

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >ai creativity is literally Black person-tier garbage
    lol

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    creativity is not a fricking race. the ai shoe looks ike shit btw.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >absolute bricks
    >straight heat
    Its over human bros

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Short stock photo companies as soon as Dall-E 2 or Google Imagen become widely available.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I have access to dalle2. Taking requests(no illegal shit musk dont like it)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      security cam footage of a bear fighting a bull

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i want to see milana vayntrub kissing hitler

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      diocletian starting price controls on oil and gas

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What was the prompt for this?

        I think it was “Patrick Bateman, pixel art”

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          don't skip mine. you'll only prove the limited capacity of this meme of a program.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I did yours

            [...]
            I think it was “Patrick Bateman, pixel art”

            used roman emperor instead of diocletian since the result of your prompt turned out to he just random letters kek

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Oh you asked Hitler thing. Can’t do that they don’t allow political stuff or pornography

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I have access to dalle2. Taking requests(no illegal shit musk dont like it)

          Cuckoo bird performing open brain surgery

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What was the prompt for this?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Giant cat eating the planet Saturn.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Donald Trump in the style of Dr Seuss

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Animal of human ancestry

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >How do I profit from ai replacing human creativity?
    that's not how you should view it.

    ai is taking the culmination of successful human design and producing a new thing. what you get is something eyecatching, but mostly gaudy in nature. the flaw with humans is that they cannot invent. we cannot invent what god/nature has already provided us. to just use one's imagination alone, you end up with a dud of a project. we require a bank of information from various sources. if you take the human and tell them to build and thoughtfully design with the assistance of AI or other successful tools. The human result will usually be most appealing.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Invest in Nvidia, they do some of the best research in the field.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >AI
    >"creativity"
    so don't get me wrong, AI will replace 90%+ of human graphic design talent soon because it does a 'good enough' job for free. But it will never be truly creative. It will always be stuck remixing/recombinating prior human creative accomplishments into shitty mashups that don't break any ground and don't say anything new. They'll look cool, because the source material they're drawing from/learned from looked cool, and indeed it's a great litmus test for midwits who always cream their jeans over the groovy colors and patterns that GANs generate even though it's all just aesthetic vomit at its core. But they don't do anything truly interesting, they don't advance the discourse.

    Tell a GAN to draw a picture of zujibee, which is a kind of carnivorous tropical bird that instead of laying eggs simply dies and rolls downhill into a gully, where the chick hatches inside the body and eats its way out with a specialized serrated beak, using the carcass of the mother as a starting meal to establish itself while staying hidden from predators in the gully it fell into. The AI won't draw that because it doesn't exist, I just made it up. I could draw it if I wanted to, but twenty million neural nets spinning their gears for eternity will never do it. They'll just draw lorikeets at a tea party because that's within the bounds of 'shit humans have thought of and done before which we can copy from and spit back out at them'

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > replacing human creativity
    It won’t. AI art and text just helps with brainstorming and automates tedious logical tasks. Still need real artists and writers to make true aesthetic decisions.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Shoes that look good on digital pictures
    >Same shoes look dull and disgusting irl with natural light and without the brightly colored digital gloom

    Who would watch such a trashy video?

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'd wear the ones on the left though.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Actually does anyone know how to make shoes? I want to make the ones on the left for myself personally. Thinking the top part will be stainless steel.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >be me
    >work as a journo in print media
    *dies due to Internet*
    >work translating articles
    *dies due to google translate*
    >try to make it on the market
    *outplayed by AI*
    >work in vidya art
    *dies due to AI*
    I was born just in time to get fricked in the ass by robot dick

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Take solace in the fact that AI will never know how it feels to bust inside of a woman.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *