How did Apple fall so far behind in the AI race?

How did Apple fall so far behind in the AI race?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wait, people actually think Apple has something to show for except overpriced chink shit in grey aluminum cases?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is outdated
      now it's overpriced jeet shit

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Apple repackages the innovation of others into shiny gadgets and marks up the price by 500%. And dumb suckers still buy it.

    Creating something like gpt-4 requires brains, research and innovation, which Apple will never have.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Will call it apt-11, it will be the exact same thing but cost 10 times as much

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like that Apple doesn't immediatelly jump on every new meme right from the start. You wouldn't get it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's right. they never evolve. same products released over and over again with incremental updates for the last.. 14 or 15 years? such trail blazing pioneers with their ~20% share of the computer market. my sides.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they have their own way, implement only things they want to implement and don't follow many trends

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you snooze you looze pal

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You slumber a cucumber

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >https://www.macrumors.com/2023/03/15/apple-engineers-working-on-chatgpt-like-ai/

    >Speaking to the New York Times, former Apple engineer John Burkey, who worked on Siri and was made responsible for improving it in 2014, explained that the voice assistant is built on "clunky code that took weeks to update with basic features."

    >Its "cumbersome design" made it very difficult for engineers to add new features. For example, Siri's database contains a large list of phrases in almost two dozen languages, making it "one big snowball." If someone wanted to add a word to Siri's database, Burkey added, "it goes in one big pile."

    >This means that simple updates like adding new phrases to the data set requires rebuilding the entire Siri database, which could take up to six weeks. Adding more complicated features like new search tools could take up to a whole year.

    Siri is such a badly designed piece of shit, it takes an ENTIRE YEAR to add a tiny new feature.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      chatgpt isn't much better. the data in it is far too old to be of any practical realtime use. it's nothing more than a glorified and out of date search engine that's constantly wrong.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Its only use is writing essays for students, it's pretty good at that to be fair.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they literally invented it. hasn't happened yet but you'll see.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > literally
      never did any such thing. they've never invented a single thing in their existence that changed anything. even their first computer was a 100% rip-off of don lancaster's teletypewriter, and someone managed to get him to work with apple.

      Its only use is writing essays for students, it's pretty good at that to be fair.

      it has the english skills of a 12yo that's copy/pasted chunks of wikipedia but worded it differently so it doesn't look like it's cheating. who does this shit fool and impress exactly? brain damaged retards that lick windows, wear helmets and ride on special buses?

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When Siri was first introduced it would actually answer a lot of questions for you, speak aloud actual answers, showing some real compute was going on behind the scene. Now almost everything is offloaded to a web search which is useless 99% of the time.
    I bet Apple had too much overhead for the number of customers trying to use Siri so they crippled its capabilities.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      of course. because audio recordings were being sent to pajeets to analyze. same shit amazon were doing.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Steve Jobs took their creativity to the grave when he died.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >to the grave when he died
      steve jobs isnt dead retard

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He died of aids.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Steve Jobs took their creativity to the grave when he died.
      pretty much. now they're shuffling the chairs around on the titanic hoping for a better outcome.

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-03-12/why-are-so-many-apple-executives-leaving-who-are-successors-at-apple-aapl-lf5g7j9c

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/aoEfDQD.png

      How did Apple fall so far behind in the AI race?

      A problem with charismatic leaders. They demand blind obedience so any contrarian or competitive views leave. When that head is gone you're left with directionless yes men and bean counters incapable of innovation.

      Though I think the same could be said about Microsoft after Bill Gates. The failure of Windows phones, degradation of Windows desktop, snail pace development of Windows ARM, and the segment I'm most disappointed in is failure to merge Xbox with desktop which was Bill Gates original vision.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is the stupidest take yet one that's so prevalent in society right now. Why do people take the work of literally thousands of people and then just say "That was Bill Gates", "That was Elon Musk, etc. It's a variety of factors across organisations of thousands of people. Naturally some are going to pull ahead and some are going to pull behind for a variety of reasons. The only dividing factor here is that people start to actually believe this 'leadership' cult, and then it become self-fulfilling prophecy.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They demand blind obedience
        You're retarded if you think that Jobs demanded blind obedience. He hired the best experts of the industry and still told them their ideas are shit to challenge them and squeeze the best out of them.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because they are about to take over the auto industry

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How many years has it been since rumors of an apple car started? It's got to be over a decade.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Microsoft didn't create chatgpt.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Apple
    >doing anything well
    lel

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    soon

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >summarize meetings
    No amount of computing power in the world would be enough to extract 1 piece of useful information from my companys 2 hours long useless nonsense meetings

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Apple is a hardware company

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They make more money from services and software

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        First you lock them onto your hardware. Then you make the money.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, they don't
        The iPhone alone is over half their revenue

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Apple didn't fall for the AI scam
    >must mean they are behind
    lmao

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they are a fashion company.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon gets it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nailed it. It's a status symbol for people who like pretty things. Their next product announcement is going to be a huge embarrassment.

      >You can now build Samsu- I mean, Apple Routines!

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >think apple is behind in AI
    Lol. Apple sold out to the feds to develop client aide AI that scans your device for bad think. There far ahead in many ways, just none of it is going to help plebs.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    itoddlers btfo

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      baste

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Microsoft literally bought their AI a week ago

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    siri has a memory and interacts with the iphone and icloud api.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The data is king in AI. Perhaps Apple doesn't want to train on the data of people who didn't agree to that like openai did. Imagine you worked on some open source project for years you didn't make money directly from that but you got some tribute which increased your hireability, personal brand and maybe some donations from Patreon. Now your code is used to train chatgpt. Chatgpt spits out the code that it learned from your hard work. It never references you. Moreover Microsoft makes money from your hard work meanwhile you are getting laid off. When it really starts impacting jobs. This shit will surface

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >perhaps Apple doesn't want to train on the data of people who didn't agree to that

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >How did Apple fall so far behind in the AI race?
    apple gayry.

    But Microsoft? you mean the ai they bought? kek

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Microsoft hired Chinese engineers. Apple used white engineers.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because Apple doesn't have to evolve, they have the American goy cattle culture screeching autistically at any person who doesn't own the latest goyPhone

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nignogs

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Microsoft bought the one company making the AI.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Siri still gets activated when no one even mentions the word "Siri".
    Just talking about some technology stuff and suddenly Siri pipes up, "I have found these articles about ~ for you".

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *