How come places like Boston Dynamics have been building robots for decades but nothing happens, meanwhile AI comes out of nowhere and leaps further th...

How come places like Boston Dynamics have been building robots for decades but nothing happens, meanwhile AI comes out of nowhere and leaps further than robotics in 6 months?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    because hardware and software are two entirely different fields you moron.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We have self driving lawn mowers now

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      What we've seen in with transformers has been in the making much longer than 6 months.
      Happens all the time, technology keeps being stuck in the research phase until something clicks and a scalable approach is discovered.

      We had that more than a decade ago. Making something that works in reproducible conditions that's not the hard part.
      What's hard is making any sort of robot that's adaptable to any sort of situation. That's why you still can't buy a roomba that won't get stuck to date.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >We had that more than a decade ago.
        They weren't self pilot. They were assist pilot.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >self driving
          you mean a glorified vacuum bot that just goes around in circles? Where are the fricking robotic maids?

          [...]
          I'm not glorifying it but we went from chatbots to ChatGPT that can generate generic templates for anything you desire within a few months. Meanwhile I've been seeing those darpa morons kick their robots around for 20 years now and the best they can do is a fricking roomba?

          >I don't see it so it doesn't exist
          Dumb luddites

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know what you mean by assist pilot but lawnmower robots and roombas have been around for a long time.
          During all that the tech hasn't fundamentally changed. They map the area once and drive around in a pattern.

          Meanwhile you won't find any robot that you can just put somewhere and let it do it's thing as reliable as a worker tasked with it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >self driving
      you mean a glorified vacuum bot that just goes around in circles? Where are the fricking robotic maids?

      >another day another simpleton who thinks AI is sentient intelligence and not a glorified text generator

      I'm not glorifying it but we went from chatbots to chatgpt that can generate generic templates for anything you desire within a few months. Meanwhile I've been seeing those darpa morons kick their robots around for 20 years now and the best they can do is a fricking roomba?

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >another day another simpleton who thinks AI is sentient intelligence and not a glorified text generator

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    out of nowhere? these algos are fifty years old kek

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How come places like Boston Dynamics have been building robots for decades but nothing happens, meanwhile AI comes out of nowhere and leaps further than robotics in 6 months?
    Ever heard of DUMBs? Deep underground military labs.

    They have advanced shit down there, rushing it out would make the normalgays seethe and want to /go back/, which goes contrary to ~~*their*~~ transhumanist vision.

    Don't believe me? Look up Charles M Lieber on wikipedia, where he worked 2010-15, and what he inveted under "Nanoelectronics and the brain" and tell me if normalgays think this is even possible today. There's a study in the footnotes showing exactly how it's done lmfao.

    They're lightyears ahead of the rest of us.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Now watch as the GPTBlack folk jump me.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >everybody who laughs at my psychotic rants is a bot
        whatever you say schizo

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Meds, now.
      >>>/x/

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI comes out of nowhere
    The first neural networks were created over 70 years ago

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Please share a video of yourself generating an AI image 2 years ago even in the most basic of forms, I'll be waiting

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Die

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          (You) generating them with a simple text command, not a fricking study about it, moron. The whole point of this thread is accessibility, I don't fricking care what technologies BD has if we're not benefitting from this as normal human beings.

          https://i.imgur.com/vYhbCum.png

          You're fricking black

          >oh my science this photo has filters on it! IT's AI GENERATED!
          pathetic

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >deep learning-generated images from an open-source, fully reproducible repo is not deep learning because... it just isn't OK
            the absolute state

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >waaaah typing "python do_it.py" is too haaaaard

            [...]

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/30002259/#q30002259
        1 year and 7 months ago

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're fricking black

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Here's 2016, moronic consooomer

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Deep learning was a thing since the 1950's and there has been no improvements since 2015. The illusion of progress you see is two-fold: 1- moronscaling of old tech and 2- previous tech, though public and even open source, not being presented in a web service easy for you as a moronic tech illiterate consoooomer to consooooom.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Robotics is hard. AI is fricking meme.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Another problem is that they're behind the times in a lot of ways. For example, they still typically use old-school path planning when deep learning-driven path planning has blown it out the water since the early 2000's. It's a similar situation to how computer vision waited until alexnet to adopt deep learning when it was already being destroyed by it since the late 90's.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >so bro why hasn't robotics advanced as fast as scaled up text predictors (now with special hardware)
    it's a mystery

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *