Yes but the government is making decisions because 'experts' tell them llama on a personal computer gives instructions on how to make bioweapons.. it's probably confident in answering but bullshit just like this example from chatgpt.
So it's important to make fun of the stupid answers it gives so people understand the limitations properly.
> lets be real, what kind of success rate do you think you'd get by surveying people off the street regarding the question of if 2 was prime or not?
normies are maybe retarded, but they aren't braindead
Honestly I asked in my group of friends this question, all my friends are IT related as workers or hobby invested. 2 out of 5 friends knew it right, the other 3 couldn't recall what a prime number is as they never needed it in their work. So it seems more people don't know the answer.
>hardmode
The only thing hard about that is trying to justify it as an appropriate comparison. The glorified autocompleter spat out the correct definition in no uncertain terms and still failed to correctly apply it. If your comparison is to be applicable, you'd have to ask how many people would tell you "2 is divisible by 1 and 2, not just 1 and itself."
Ignorance of the masses is simply not comparable to genuine inability to understand how simple truth that has already been stated very obviously conflicts with a following statement.
>Free tier dumbed-down GPT3.5
lmao
Yes but the government is making decisions because 'experts' tell them llama on a personal computer gives instructions on how to make bioweapons.. it's probably confident in answering but bullshit just like this example from chatgpt.
So it's important to make fun of the stupid answers it gives so people understand the limitations properly.
Ask it to write a program to check if a number is prime
it couldn't even write an autohotkey script for runescape alchemy without multiple fixes being needed
lets be real, what kind of success rate do you think you'd get by surveying people off the street regarding the question of if 2 was prime or not?
> lets be real, what kind of success rate do you think you'd get by surveying people off the street regarding the question of if 2 was prime or not?
normies are maybe retarded, but they aren't braindead
i'd say more than 50%
hardmode: without reminding them what the definition of a prime number is
Honestly I asked in my group of friends this question, all my friends are IT related as workers or hobby invested. 2 out of 5 friends knew it right, the other 3 couldn't recall what a prime number is as they never needed it in their work. So it seems more people don't know the answer.
>hardmode
The only thing hard about that is trying to justify it as an appropriate comparison. The glorified autocompleter spat out the correct definition in no uncertain terms and still failed to correctly apply it. If your comparison is to be applicable, you'd have to ask how many people would tell you "2 is divisible by 1 and 2, not just 1 and itself."
Ignorance of the masses is simply not comparable to genuine inability to understand how simple truth that has already been stated very obviously conflicts with a following statement.
He's saying that even if they answered randomly it would be 50%
There's 0 use case for prime numbers in real life
11 is a prime age
Gem. Absolute gemerald.
noncerald I do declare
what is wrong here?
Friendly reminder that there are """ people""" who genuinely believe that language models are intelligent and understand the words they spit out.
Gem
Coal
>ask like a retarded ESL
>puts LLM into retard-mode and it answers like a retard
Skill issue.
take the bardpill
Bard is better than GPT but it still is just autofill x30