>have to debug code from colleagues
>it's obviously ChatGPT code because of the moronic amount of comments
>it's dogshit
free me from this mortal coil
>have to debug code from colleagues. >it's obviously chatGPT code because of the retarded amount of comments
go postal
Kek, I just built a macro enabled spreadsheet my company now has to send to our head of IT security for him to review the code. It's 23 macros with 500-600 lines per macro. I fricking was almost crying laughing when I sent it to him. You think I fricking know VBA? I love GPT.
i hate you i hate you please get fired
How many upstarts has Excel/VBA survived?
>Anon, explain to me what this section of the code do?
>You don't know?
>Anon, explain to me what this section of the code do?
>Sure, lemme just read the comments above that explicitly states what the code is doing in plain english.
>Ok, let's see if you can write a function that reverses a linked list.
>I'm not being interviewed. if you want your reversed linked list, I'll get it to you after my bathroom break. You have a problem? Speak to my union head.
Why don't you homosexuals just quit if you hate doing you job properly? Seriously fricking hate Black folk like you.
except dev not reviewer is blamed when shit hits the fan. And now you won't even be able to explain/debug the code.
>
thats why theres a reviewer
Just quit and go back to McDonalds, you're just clogging the system like a giant turd
>You think I fricking know VBA
Nobody thinks that because it aren't going to work. It's been tested, GPT knows frick all about old languages, boomers don't like making the code public so the training set is relatively small.
based frick the reviewer if it bring problems just ditch the company
In a clown world you must embrace the stupidity I kneel anon may you have a promotion
SAR BLOODY BASTERD b***h SAAR!!! WHY ARE YOU PROSTITUTE?
FIX YOUR COOD SAR!§
>>have to debug code from colleagues
>>it's obviously chatGPT code
Tell your manager. Your coworkers have violated the compliance by sending a private, proprietary code to a third party. What are the outcomes?
1) Nothing happens
2) Or, ChatGPT will be banned from your work net
2.1) Additionally, all of the GPTshitters will be fired. Win-win.
Anyway, the company doesn't need them when you're the one reviewing it.
I think chatGPT is going to be good for programming in general because morons are going to use it to write worse code and get filtered out of the industry more quickly
As much as I hate this 'AI' shit allowing any moron or his entire company to get by with barely working ugly lumps of code glued together, it's exactly all it takes to kill off enterprise programming as a market niche of any measurable size. I cannot even imagine them faces of SaaS rent-seeking leeches these days, it must be glorious.
Now that chatgpt is writing code that gets published on github, and then used in the next training batch for chatgpt, it's going to be a downward spiral of incomprehensible shit code.
>Computer, write me a program that formats this unix time value as month day year hour minute second
>*beep boop*
>*prints out 100,000 lines of bullshit*
>*you compile it, which takes 30 minutes*
>*it actually works*
>Great, ship it.
Can't wait until every app is 10GB and nobody knows how it works or is able to fix bugs.
Oh wait haha we're at that point already today.
Computers aren't getting fast enough for that shit.
If you can't distinguish ai generated stuff from human input your ai may reach a point when it starts getting worse with training and you don't know why.