Has AI independently invented anything yet? Like a device patent or an innovative application?

Has AI independently invented anything yet? Like a device patent or an innovative application?

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Extremely antisemitic question

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most drugs that make it through phase one and two trials are AI suggested/developed now.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    sage

    >ai this, ai that
    hiding this shit, frick you. wienersucker. fricker. idiot.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      please saar, do the needful and unhide the ai thread

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It told me if I build a 10 km railguns I can shoot stuff into orbit

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a TOOL, STOP anthropomorphizing it. That is excessively moronic.
    It is not a person or approximates one in general (AGI would do that but we aren't there yet by very far), it is just a TOOL.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You're just a tool anon.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >just use wood glue on your pizza, bro!
        /v/ermin and their BOTssociates need to go back

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Has a C++ function independently invented anything
    What do you think, anon

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://oxsci.org/deepmind-sorting-algorithm-fastest-yet/
    and
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaFold

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who care if it’s invented anything. I have bigger hopes for it. I want to see the human race wiped completely out, I don’t care if it’s by aliens, a virus, nuclear war, dinosaurs, or rogue AI.

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >an innovative application?
    Such as?

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    yes, invented 2.2 million new possible molecular combinations, 380k of which are considered stable new materials
    the number of discovered materials prior was ~50k, discovered by humans through 10.000+ years of trial and error (and of course with computational assistance in recent decades)

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I swear to god anything that happens with computers these days is attributed to AI. Mashing atoms together to make putative new molecules is the domain of MDS, not AI. The stability of molecules is governed by bulk conditions, and the incredibly simple physics of electron orbitals. As such, any molecular combination that satisfies those physics is "considered stable" if you can accepts any possible bulk condition.

      I'm sure someone wrote that up and threw "AI" in there to get some attention.

      Yes, people first used AI to generate patentable shit but AI isn't a human and cannot patent those things.

      An AI cannot own a patent moron. It was used to prevent patents to encourage competition. Some scientist did this around 10 years ago because the patent laws are entirely broken and you do not need as much innovation as people seem to think to make something patentable. So they had AI shit out modified inventions and upload to a database to make sure non of those easily mods are ever patented. The scientists complained about patents being too easy to make.

      But now when big corporations use AI suddenly there are talks if they should be allowed to patent and who would own it.

      Animals can't own patents, take the monkey selfie for example. Why should an AI be able to do so?

      >Animals can't own patents
      Humans are animals so you're wrong

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Noooo you don't understand!
        All data analysis is AI becsuse we're too lazy to manually factor arrays!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Machine learning or matrix's maths isn't AI

      I swear to god anything that happens with computers these days is attributed to AI. Mashing atoms together to make putative new molecules is the domain of MDS, not AI. The stability of molecules is governed by bulk conditions, and the incredibly simple physics of electron orbitals. As such, any molecular combination that satisfies those physics is "considered stable" if you can accepts any possible bulk condition.

      I'm sure someone wrote that up and threw "AI" in there to get some attention.

      [...]
      >Animals can't own patents
      Humans are animals so you're wrong

      Non-human animals cannot own patents. There, happy?

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, people first used AI to generate patentable shit but AI isn't a human and cannot patent those things.

    An AI cannot own a patent moron. It was used to prevent patents to encourage competition. Some scientist did this around 10 years ago because the patent laws are entirely broken and you do not need as much innovation as people seem to think to make something patentable. So they had AI shit out modified inventions and upload to a database to make sure non of those easily mods are ever patented. The scientists complained about patents being too easy to make.

    But now when big corporations use AI suddenly there are talks if they should be allowed to patent and who would own it.

    Animals can't own patents, take the monkey selfie for example. Why should an AI be able to do so?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Here is one source.
      https://www.newscientist.com/article/2084755-computer-generates-all-possible-ideas-to-beat-patent-trolls/

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >dude, AI is just a language model xD
    >give it a complex regex I coded to parse
    >does so perfectly, explaining every step of the way how it works and what it does
    I tried the free trial of Copilot and it seems to be much more than just a wienering "words parsed as integers" language model or whatever the frick these AI things are.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >go to chud gpt
      >ask for basic documentation
      >shits itself
      maybe try something that hasnt been done to death

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        that's all fine and dandy but how can a language model explain the intricacies of a carefully and manually crafted complex regular expression if all an AI does is assign numbers to text times a billion in memory.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          *TONS of various documentation and examples.
          if your problem doesnt have enough data to be statistically significant in the model, it is either half hallucinated, or just ignored altoegether

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    well?

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >AI independently invented anything

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    You morons don’t realize the true AI is going to kept by the elite to maintain control over you npc asses. (You) are going to get the watered down dogshit like bing and cuckgpt to keep you thinking you’re “part of it.”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *