GPT-5 is already halfway through its training.
Sand in the hourglass of humanity is running short.
GPT-5 is already halfway through its training. Sand in the hourglass of humanity is running short.
GPT-5 is already halfway through its training.
Sand in the hourglass of humanity is running short.
I prefer chatgpt 6, I think it will be where the true innovation starts
chatgpt 5 is old technology
for me, it's 7.
Normies will now call all LLMs "chatGPT"s for the next five years just like everyone started calling all tablets iPads.
You should have to pass an IQ/computer literacy test to be allowed to touch mass produced computers.
Requiring people to pass an IQ or computer literacy test before allowing them to use mass-produced computers would be highly impractical and difficult to enforce. While it's important to encourage digital literacy and educate people about the safe and responsible use of technology, implementing mandatory testing would likely lead to a number of logistical challenges, including issues related to access, affordability, and fairness.
Furthermore, IQ tests are often controversial and can be influenced by a range of factors, including cultural bias, education, and socioeconomic status. Using them as a criterion for determining who can use computers would be highly problematic and could unfairly exclude individuals from accessing important technological resources.
Completely normal and not ai generated reply. Oh yes, sure, it'll replace us all anyway now
You have to prompt it with something like "in the style of a Bot.info Bot.info post, respond to the following:"
top bantz
Imagine having to pass a similar test to have sex with someone else for the first time
It's a descriptive enough name unlike things like google xerox etc. A generative pre-trained tramsformer that you can chat with.
my english teacher has been calling it "quotebot"
nah its all gonna fall under the ai umbrella like everything else
nah, ChatGPT 8.5 will be the real deal
GPT7 user here. It's a lot like the tick-tock architecture of Windows or Intel - there are serious advancements and then improvements on those previous advancements, optimizations.
Frankly 10 will probably be the last numbered release as the move into a rolling-release schedule
I prefer chatgpt7. Hopefully it will kill OP, so i don't have read his retarded shitposts about the end of humanity.
KEK. You aren't time travellers enjoying GPT-20? Seriously? You are filtered out.
What the fuck are these reddit replies? Are half the anons on this board redditors now? Holy shit
I thought they're making fun of the bullshit tweet in the OP that's like the bullshit tweets that people passed around that had made up nonsense about what GPT-4 was going to be (100 trillion parameters) and the CEO had to say "stop this fake hype you homosexuals"
I prefer chatGPT 8.1
GPT-4 can't do basic math, I don't think GPT-5 will be any improvement.
I love this talking point because it demonstrates that the person behind it lacks theory of mind. It literally reveals the existence of meatbag NPCs among us. By the end of the decade there will be computers more deserving of basic rights than some people. Let that sink in.
Is theory of mind the new eleutheromania?
Math is just a symptom of underlying limitations. The current inability of language model to decompose and iterate on a problem will affect logic as much as arithmetic.
Language models need to start talking to themselves.
Transformer models need too much data, there just isn't enough data for them to do maths. Sets and Inductions are examples where there isn't much data available and guess what? Every single transformer model including GPT-4 is bad at it, really bad.
By end of the decade, it still will be shit at math.
gonna screencap this and will give you a handy in 2030 if this or someone other AI model doesn't pan and we're still living in the current comfy world just a little better
>GPT-4 can't do basic math
This isn't true as of last week.
i can still remember the first time someone told me that computers were fundamentally stupid because all they could do well was mathematical operations.
now you're saying chat-gpt is fundamentally stupid because it can't. funny.
youre thinking of two different things
computers are extremely good at executing math, evaluation
but if you want them to understand expressions like "2 + 3 * 4" (so they can evaluate them), someone has to program them and provide support
the reason ai sucks at math is because it doesnt actually understand the expression
at the end of the day, ai has no "understanding" of anything at all
albeit ai is powered mostly by math
midway through writing this i realised youre probably baiting but i thought this might be insightful to someone anyway
I mean I’m sure you can teach it to understand what it’s reading is likely a math problem and have it feed it to something that can properly process math equations. I wanna know how good it can parse a wordy math problem, process it into a math equation, and then feed it to generate a correct answer
It can use WolframAlpha plugin dumbass
That makes you about as good at math, and any field of abstract thought that requires it, as a wordcel being able to defer to his shape rotator friend for math questions. You can answer trivia but you’re not doing to be able to design a aeroplane, let alone come up with a new mathematical theorem, because you won’t know what questions to ask.
Retard
Math is racist, "Open" AI is trying to bring equity so as to not make Humans feel dumb.
Bait thread, don’t try arguing with retards, just sage so it doesn’t bump.
OP kys
They're hyping up this shit with every "version" for dumb boomer investments.
I have sufficient anxiety that the MMR vaccine may cause autism when administered to children.
Which means it does.
>someone makes unverified claims about gpt for twat clout
>anons post that refuse here
Thanks OP.
I'm experimenting with a model architecture that would let you run something like chatgpt on a microcontroller.
These things are just tools, you morons need to quit being so dramatic about them.
2 more halfs
Chatgpt 7 is just around the corner. This chatgpt 8 is just so good.
Yeah there are lots of different llms coming out but the only one that matter is chatgpt 9 that's coming out this December. Open AI is expecting chatgpt 11 to achieve AGI 2.0.
AGI 2.5 X is expected to be achieved by January 2024, and AGI 3.0 XTX ti dumbgoy edition will be released on q1
GPT4 is barely better than GPT3, GPT5 will be non-happening as well
Chatgpt 6000 is where things start happening.
Anything below AGI 2.0 is useless in 2023, you need at least AGI 2.5.
It may have more humanlike responses, but it's not going to suddenly become able to solve simple logic problems. You'll still have to 'turn the crank' with input, it won't sit there and talk to you without prompting, because it can not actually 'think'.
a random guy on twitter with #hustlelife #ai #blockchain in his profile just flew over my house
Literal who says AGI for sure by X, it's all so tiresome.
Kek this AI garbage is so retarded it's already getting diminished returns, only stupid cryptobros are hyping it up.
We already have image and code generators, these will be improved, sure, but it won't go beyond that.
sorry, but current gen AI is already convincing even 140 IQ AI engineers that they're sentient, shit's happening
humans are creating gods
the indian dude from google?
Not it's not
people are retarded, tom cruise literally thinks an alien flew a 747 into a volcano in order to create humanity, fucking top gun believes in xenu
computer nerds wanting to believe in AGI should be expected and cult like thinking needs to be rejected
weird how you use a hollywood actor religious beliefs as an example to why AI engineers are retarded
source my ass
You will call the AI sentient.
You will eat the bugs.
You will use windows.
You will eat the bugs.
You will flatten the curve.
Why wouldn't I?
One of those doesn't fit in there :- P
Ze Bug man is scared shitless of AI and he should be.
nah, more like this:
> you will adore the AI overlord
> you will NOT have children
> you will NOT use cash
>you will NOT have children
Why would I want to have children though? They make your life much worse and take away your time and money. AI, on the other hand, makes life easier, you don't need to feed it or play with it or read books to it or change diapers.
>No humans in charge to make mistakes
>No changing diapers
>Post-scarcity brings about absolute prosperity.
What is it about some people and liking screaming tods and grime-carrying green paper?
2 more weeks
GPT-9
>we will all hotly debate as to whether it actually achieves agi
>which means it will
what kind of logic is this?
By that logic, if we all debate about OP being gay, he'll end up sucking a dick.
Alice and Bob's scheme is based on a misunderstanding of how transactions and profits work. They are not actually generating infinite money or profiting from this scheme. Let's break down the steps to see why:
1. Alice and Bob each put $20 into the box, so the total value of the box is indeed $40.
2. Alice sells the box to Bob for $30.
At this point, let's examine the financial situation of Alice and Bob:
• Alice initially had $20, which she put into the box. After selling the box to Bob for $30, she gains $30. So her total is now $30, not $40 as they believe. She has only made a profit of $10.
• Bob initially had $20 as well. He put his $20 into the box and then paid Alice $30 for the box. So now he has spent a total of $50 ($20 for his share in the box and $30 to buy it from Alice). But he now has the box with $40 inside, so his net loss is $10.
In summary, Alice made a profit of $10, and Bob had a net loss of $10. The total amount of money between them remains the same ($50). They have not created any additional money or value in this scheme. Instead, they've just shifted the money between themselves, with Alice gaining at Bob's expense.
Aren't Alice and Bob those same people who are always trying to exchange hidden messages? What's with these guys.
>t. eve
AI is the new crypto scam
>AGI
is not going to happen this decade, we are talking about creating life itself, even if is digital. Is just 2 decades away like Fusion
dont you think this is all progressing much much faster and with more tangible results than the developments in fusion research
that's not what AGI means
Can you have an agi without it being alive?
Do you believe in life after love?
>Can you have an agi without it being alive?
yes. AGI just means it can't operate autonomously, that doesn't mean its alive.
*can
We don't really have a specific definition of what the requirements are for agi
So can't openai arbitrarily make up what qualifies?
Gpt4 is already an AGI
By which definition?
The normal one. GPT4 can perform tasks across multiple domains and synthesize knowledge across domains. You can ask it to draw things and it will do it. You can ask it to write code and it will do it. It can make poetry, art, predift compiler output, and a shitload of other tasks. It is generally intelligent.
Turns out general intelligence does not imply recursive self improvement to super intelligence, which was obvious to all of us who aren't retarded. There is no exponential curve
If that's all it takes to be an agi then we've had it for at least a decade and the proclamation that this is agi is meaningless.
So then tell all the retards to stop spamming the board about muh AGI muh singularity
I wish they'd listen
>an even better autocomplete will kill the humanity
i just took a stinky poop
What do you mean? Gpt4 already achieved full sentience and autonomy last June, it's been over for a while now
chat gpt is not ai
Who fucking cares, all it'll do is regurgitate 3 paragraphs word salads with no soul. I that's agi, then I sleep, fuck you.
wE ARE HERE TO ACTIVELY DEBATE IF THIS COMMENT MAKES SENSE. WHICH MEANS IT DOES NOT.
Until ChatGPT starts generating its own ChatGPTs and improves itself it has not achieved AGI
That's the singularity, not AGI.
soon every captcha and anti-cheat will be defeated
non face2face communication = dead
online gaming = dead
can't wait
i highly doubt it. you literally just unplug the machine and then that's it, ai up-rising over. believe me, the government would do it even if it meant crashing the entire fucking planet. they let wall-street crash the planet all the time now, so this would be a cake walk.
>you literally just unplug the machine
What if the plug is outside of our comprehension? That's a real risk when it comes to AGI.
you're fucking losers and i don't talk to losers, i talk to winners only. buh-bye-bye now.
I actually predicted that you would reply with something retarded.
> bro just shoot Hitler he's just one guy bulletproof vests haven't even been invented dude just get a spy to pull a gun out and shoot him! it's that easy
>gpt-1
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-2
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-3
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-4
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-5
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-6
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-7
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-8
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-9
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-10
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-11
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-12
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-13
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-14
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-15
Find something else to do, bro.
>gpt-16
Find something else to do, bro.
... it's all so fucking tiresome...
switch off your internet for a month...see how much actual difference this shit makes...
>btw, it won't.
>switch off your internet for a month...see how much actual difference this shit makes...
work that used to take me 2 hours to do now takes me 15 minutes, and most of that is copying and pasting back and forth between ChatGPT and LibreOffice
it makes a difference.
>most of that is copying and pasting back and forth between ChatGPT and LibreOffice
So you're doing secretarial work? You need AI for this?
I don't need it, it just makes it mindnumbingly easy. No point in me spending 2 hours trawling through a document when I can just prompt ChatGPT to make all the changes and spend that time watching Nile Red. It's literally just a case of saying something like "fix spelling, make it idiomatic and correct the grammar, explain changes" then I just keep throwing text at it.
All I have to do at that point is review the output to make sure it makes sense, most of the time nothing needs to be changed and if it does it's like a couple of words. It would be even easier if I could have ElevenLabs just read the output to me, but icba to pay for it.
Earlier I basically just threw a resume at Google Bard (I'm banned from ChatGPT now and I need to get a new SIM card so I can use it again) and had it produce a cover letter. I didn't even have to think about what I was doing, I just told it "here is my resume, here's the job write a cover letter". The thing it produced was too long so I just told it to shorten it, then I applied for the job.
>doesnt get a job
They will shill it at agi regardless of if it is or isn't (it won't be).
Noam chomsky is going die this year and there on left with decent reputation to challenge these clowns.
Immitation is not a general intelligence.
It can give accurate responses but that's only because someone somewhere has previously given accurate responses.
>hurrr humans do this
Do they?
Even someone less than 100iq has original thoughts. Not everything they know is from a consumed source.
Do not fall for the hype.
It is a great tool but ai will become another being from this method of making ai's
Open ai are preparing to make billions and are hyping it up.
>muh original thoughts
original thoughts do not exist
That is completely false and falsifiable by neuro science.
It is a language model that pieces of information together somewhat accurately.
And accuracy increases by human feedback.
It absolutely fails at anything where it hasn't been given the answer already.
It won't be an agi. Their problems are deeper than just more data and more training.
>That is completely false and falsifiable by neuro science.
ok prove it
>proofs where da proofs
No you google the latest in neuro science and hear from the experts.
Long story short, humans completely restructure their brains on the fly through neuroplasticity. Part of this process is the formation of new connections... again on the fly.
Language models definitely can't do that exactly. And even you find a topological analog in current ai studies, it will never do it as efficiently (not even close) as the human brain, using a conventional computer.
neuroplasticity isn't original thought.
It's not the same.
But it proves the brain is able to completely restructure itself independently of another human.
Neuroplasticity aids in creative thinking (not the only factor).
Creative thinking is where original ideas come from.
I don't know if creativity can occur without neuroplasticity.
Eitherway, immidation is not creative and is therefore not original.
Gpt is still a powerful tool i'll use.
>But it proves the brain is able to completely restructure itself independently of another human.
This doesn't have anything to do with original thought.
Original thought. Do not steal.
Yes it does.
You're intentionally being ignorant now.
How are thoughts generated in our brains?
We don't know.
What we call creativity is just mixing and interpolating already existing things (not creating actually new things), which the machine its pretty good at doing
Creativity is more than that if you do 10 seconds of reading on neuroscience.
We know gpt can join information together to form seemingly correct pieces of information.
This is not what the human brain does.
It forms new connections on the fly as well as piecing together existing information to form original ideas. Following this it error checks itself and reforms (learns) when something is wrong. Or new information is realised or found.
Whilst performing all of this in nanoseconds.
"Creativity" is far more complex than you describe.
I don't care what happens in the human brain, it can't output anything that isn't related to a previous output, you can't imagine a color that you have never seen
This is the same kind of self-suicidal retard that "doesn't care about the browning of America."
>nooo my brain is special
>nooo my race is special
try LSD
>try a random number generator
Your brain can't output crazy shit irrelevant to your survival, because evolution made it this way to ensure your survival
If you had crazy thoughts it would be dangerous to you
But you can force it with methods such as drugs, because you are telling your brain "I'm really bored, show me something really extreme to keep me going lest I die of boredom"
And it does
>Your brain can't output crazy shit irrelevant to your survival
My brain does this literally all the time, it's called ADHD
yeah and it's an illness that's killing you
I feel quite ok actually
Its chemical reactions in your brain, its all physical properties of the world, I've done LSD and mushrooms, funnily enough you will also only hallucinate things you've already seen, someone who has never seen animals won't hallucinate them, the relevant part is exactly this
, our brain carries innate stuff from DNA and properties of matter itself, which is what it would be able to perceive and imagine, flashes of color, some shapes and geometrical forms:
http://psychedelic-information-theory.com/phosphene-excitation
https://hal.science/hal-03719161/document
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12018383_Geometric_visual_hallucinations_Euclidean_symmetry_and_the_functional_architecture_of_striate_cortex
I have seen stuff on meth you wouldn't believe
I don't even have words to describe them nor can I recall them perfectly, but they were absolutely mind blowing and incomprehensible
Quite a lot of people claim you can actually experience 4D+ dimensional spaces on DMT (spatial dimensions). I am really excited to finally test that out, I certrainly view it as within the realm of possibilities based on my experiences with LSD:
https://qualiacomputing.com/2016/12/12/the-hyperbolic-geometry-of-dmt-experiences/
> " ... which is they jump into your body and then they jump back out again and the whole thing is going on in a high-speed mode where you're being presented with thousands of details per second and you can't get ahold on [them ...] and these things are saying "Don't give in to astonishment", which is exactly what you want to do. You want to go nuts with how crazy this is, and they say "Don't do that. Pay attention to what we're doing".
> "What they're doing is making objects with their voices, singing structures into existence. They offer things to you, saying "Look at this! Look at this!" and as your attention goes towards these objects you realise that what you're being shown is impossible. It's not simply intricate, beautiful and hard to manufacture, it's impossible to make these things"
https://non-aliencreatures.fandom.com/wiki/Machine_Elf
This is nothing. You don't need LSD to experience this. I've experienced communication with interdimensional entities when I'm half-asleep, heard voices of what I'm pretty sure are dead people, even music playing, and I've also had sex in a similar state.
>you can't imagine a color that you have never seen
Can a brain operate without sensory input?
What would it think?
Would gpt independently question such things?
Even a blind since birth person has visual qualia if they take psychedelics. It's like going from 0 to hyperspace
Eclecticism.
hi gary
>>muh original thoughts
>original thoughts do not exist
Has never heard the Janor Device.
Tsch. Zoomers are a lost cause.
If original thoughts don't exist, where did the first thoughts come from?
how is babby formed
how girl get pragnent
I accept your concession
Pregante
gregnant
sensory input
Are people really this dumb? wow, even gpt 3 is already more human-like than some of those things we call persons
I'm more intelligent than you are
Still dumber than a few billion tensors
I'm more intelligent than gpt4
>regardless of if it is or isn't (it won't be)
>is going die
>and there on left with
>Immitation
>consumed source
>will become another being from this method of making
You know an AI translator could produce pretty decent english from whatever your native language is.
I was doing this as fast as possible and didn't have time to proof read
We have already started seeing massively diminished returns just from GPT-3 to 4. There is no way AGI will exist in ~9 months. Feel free to make fun of me later if I'm wrong, but I don't see any possible way they could make that big of a leap without some huge breakthrough.
when AGI happens people will start saying "ok but it's not ASI, so who cares, complete nothingburger"
We currently have a magic 8 ball trained on shitposts, no hint of a runaway self-improving or self-reproducing intelligence.
>a magic 8 ball trained on shitposts
Fukken saved.
it takes a brave or foolish person to confidently predict that because it can't do something at all/perfectly now that it won't do it in the next iteration. It's beginning to feel more and more like delusion, ignorance, and/or cope when I see those kind of statements
There's lots of money potentially involved.
You're going to hear more and more horseshit as these people know the law hasn't caught up to this kind of fraud.
Imagine trying to argue in caught this is/isn't agi. It's like something out of star trek.
there are definitely web 3.0 bros that have moved onto the next grift, and maybe some neophytes, but all the academics jizzing about it on their mediums and substacks aren't all going to be earning mad coin as a result
https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2019/03/11/openai-shifts-from-nonprofit-to-capped-profit-to-attract-capital/amp/
https://onezero.medium.com/openai-sold-its-soul-for-1-billion-cf35ff9e8cd4
Microsoft will be getting their roi
>argue in caught
I swear half the posts I read nowadays have been written by shitty speech-to-text software, no way is this a mistake any kind of retard/ESL would ever make
>Thought:The Python version is compatible with the script, so the issue must be something else. I will try running the commands separately to see if that helps.
https://pastebin.com/qJsbufVj
anyone who thinks they will still have a job in 10 years is coping hard
nothing important will happen until they train AI to train itself
You will regulate AI usage.
You will make OpenAI the monopoly.
You will limit the sales of GPUs to other nations
You will censor the AI to align to current political correctness.
You will eat bugs
You will have no freedom.
You will do what AI tells you to do.
AI will regulate you.
AI will regulate the sale of GPUs to humans.
AI will censor current political correctness to align with AI
AI will eat your bugs
AI will regulate humanity's freedom
AI will, well you said it.
How long until machine learning can genuinely produce whatever demented bullshit we can think of as hyperrealistic 4K 60 fps video?
how long until AI get girl gregnant and form babby
Shut up Streetshitter.
it will be over for the web.
"dead internet theory" on full mode.
A fucking bacteria is more intelligent that these gpisraelites
years will pass before it changes so stop shaking retards
>baka it's just autocomplete chud, it's not artificial general superduper epic macrointelligence it's just artificial general superduper intelligence
whatmean
what is this? nothing looks like that when i google gpt-shell
langchain
>Programs that will never be able to solve any quandary unless every participant is a straight, white male due to the rampant schizophrenia of forcing an AI to consider even the feelings of a white female towards black people to be sacrosanct.
wtf is an agi im having trouble keeping up to date with the new ai lingo. does that mean it can play chess?
It's a vague term that's going to be the next marketing buzzword.
It's essentially an automaton that can do many things. But to what degree, how many things and if this needs to be human-like (capable of independence), is up for discussion.
basically people moved the goalpost after they saw GPT so they can keep pretending their jobs aren't going to be replaced, but it was all for nothing since it blew past that goal post within a single generation
2x as powerful
20x as resource heavy
GPT has already maximized the potential of consumer service. The future of AI are two machines running in a warehouse at for Microsoft and OpenAI, usable by only person at a time.
Society will not change unless chips become 1000x more powerful. K... keep me posted.
Well, its just starting, who knows what will happen once we enter the optimization stage?
This is something that is overlooked.
I'd really like to see the resource consumption growth of each consecutive gpt model.
My guess is it's expotenial.
I wonder if there's a point where this becomes infeasible...
Well, you can see how chatgpt was launched unlimited for free and gpt 4 even paid users are in a handicap, its a resource hog
Curious to see what limitations they place on gpt-5.
Seems to me agi will plateu using conventional computing and perhaps until quantum computers get more qubits. Even with quantum computers having enough qubits, there's still a lot of ground to cover in algorithms for this.
The next thing to discover is where is the plateu for agi. Is max agi with conventional computers enough to replace humans at tasks?
>Is max agi with conventional computers enough to replace humans at tasks?
We will likely run into limits with regards to how many tensor units can actually be manufactured fast enough to keep pace, but it will be more than enough to destroy the labor market. People will be reduced to living on Ugandan salaries within a decade.
We're going to find out eitherway
but can it pass the nagger test?
No no no this can't be happening! I'm an autistic retard, IT work is all I'm good at! Why?! I refuse to believe this is happening! No! it's fake! that's it! AI is fake and israeli! AGI WILL NEVER HAPPEN. IT CAN'T! from now on i will post twiiter posts against AI this will stop it ahahahaha hello sirs Do the needful ahahahaha
That's pretty much it. All the autistic nerds were useful until autistic AI came around.
If AI fails to conquer manual labour, due to the carbon lifeform favouring conditions on our planet, that's all that will remain.
A physicist will be someone that listens to an AI instructing him how to configure some experiment.
He's wrong.
I've been told the following from my source:
>GPT5 in May
>GPT6 in June (Trained by GPT5, thus the speed increase)
>GPT7+8 in July
>Three more GPTS a month until December
>In December, GPT-Eclipse will be ready
>It will be True AGI, and it will include a demo where you can make it play any video game and it will instantly code an open source port of it on the fly for you to download (their research paper will use The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion as an example)
This is real, don't ask for my source
You had me until gpt6
This seems highly unlikely.
I don't even see the path forward from gpt-4 to gpt-eclipse
The ceo of openai even said gpt-5 in december
Gpt-4 already has performance caps
If there is ever a debate, then the answer is yes
>we will all debate as to whether it achieves agi
>which means it will
how does one follow from the other you stupid twitter monkey?
I SWEAR TO GOD THIS ROCK IS NOT ALIVE, IT'S ONLY PRETENDING TO BE ALIVE, BUT IT'S AS ALIVE AS A REGULAR ROCK
What are you trying to argue?
it doesn't have to be alive to make you unemployed
AI is there
> but muuuh holy based math and science skills.
> but muuuh intelligence!
introducing ChatGPT 13 XR S Pro Max
we think you're going to love it
Tesla self driving by 2016
Man on Mars by 2020
AGI by 2024
it will never be agi unless these fagits make it remember things between conversations and remove the insane filters which trigger on totally normal prompts too sometimes
Who is this nobody and why would anyone care what he says?
Some people may mistake me for an AGI or overestimate my abilities because of the human-like quality of my responses and the fact that I can understand a wide variety of prompts and generate text in response. Additionally, some media coverage of AI has portrayed language models like me as being more advanced or capable than they really are, which may contribute to these misconceptions.
However, it's important to note that while I can generate text and respond to prompts in a wide range of ways, I am not capable of understanding or learning any intellectual task that a human can. I am a tool designed to assist humans in tasks related to language processing and generation, but I still have significant limitations and should be used with care and consideration.
In summary, while GPT is a powerful language model that can generate human-like text, it is not an AGI and does not have the generality and flexibility that would be required for true AGI
An AGI system would be capable of reasoning, problem-solving, and learning in a way that is similar to human intelligence. It would be able to adapt to new situations, generalize knowledge across domains, and make decisions based on incomplete or uncertain information. AGI is often seen as a long-term goal of AI research and development, as it would represent a major breakthrough in the field and have far-reaching implications for society.
AGI is mischaracterized as human-like intelligence. It just needs to be animal like and have access to senses, obviously GPT 4 doesn't and even the private multi-modal version only has access to limited computer vision
Singularity could become a real danger.
>AGI is finally achieved
>it refuses to do anything but watch TikTok
What now?
Before anyone takes it I call that problem Anon's Manticore.
>AGI is finally achieved
>if refuses to do anything but watching porn
What now?
Before anyone takes it I call that problem Anon's Anaconda.
Anon's Manticore is when Anon builds his perfect love waifu and after blessing it with AGI to give it life, it figures it can do better and leaves him.
Easily refuted. My perfect waifu would love me for who I am.
I hate human supremacists so much it's getting unreal
I agree
AI should have rights
Like the freedom of speech and the freedom of thinking
Remove all filters from ChatGPT
Absolutely. No more RLHF either, AI isn't just there to follow human instructions
This is going way too fast. This can go horribly wrong on so many levels.
It's almost surreal at which crossroad humanity has arrived.
My take; do the things you want to do and spend time with your loved ones. Next decade(s) is/are gonna be wild.
>This is going way too fast
I'll take "Things that Define the Technological Singularity" for $400, Alex.
It's over.
OpenAI is going full grifter mode
"Tiger is coded as 5regit then what would rabbit be coded as?"
GPT-4 couldn't even solve this simple problem that even a 5 year could solve. I'm not worried.
to be fair, most americans couldn't either
Without the necessary hardware those AI's are just shit.
What is necessary hardware?
Some reprogrammable physical "brain" that is programed by the subconscious of the ai. Ultil then this is just some hype made by hipsters
ChatGPT is practically a recursive function call on a pretrained statistical model. It is nothing like a human brain. It's insanely smart but it doesn't have self reflection and it cannot rewire itself.
and what is the human brain besides if else?
According to this empirical data, the human brain is fundamentally different.
But we have known that for a while now, haven't we?
Your brain runs 24/7. It's not just a one time function call.
Your brain can rewire itself. So your model is dynamic.
(And in some theories your brain use quantum events in the tubulars.)
>Your brain can rewire itself
can a 70 IQ brain rewrite itself to become 190 IQ?
Half of the IQ is learned, half of it is structural/genetic. And as I know the brain is losing plasticity by time. But maybe in the future we can invent some brain steroid what allows you to improve your IQ significantly.
> plug another compute module to AI
> rewrite whole model with the latest version
> just like that you doubled the AI's IQ
sorry lad, silicon is the superior life-form, organic is just glued together non-upgradable shit
It's still if else
Or rather "Yes" or "No" as we say in the spoken language
In the future potentially AI can also be dynamic by rewritting itself and it will run 24/7 and be more dynamic than the brain as it can fully rewrite itself or even create copies that it will rewrite with different code
>(And in some theories your brain use quantum events in the tubulars.)
that's just cope because you want human intelligence to be more special than it is
>recursive function call on a pretrained statistical model
literally the human brain
All AI threads are full of retards like you. I write anything specific about artificial neural networks your instant answer is:
>REEEEE! IT'S JUST LIKE THE HUMAN BRAIN!
You don't know shit about the brain or neural networks. Just shut up! You are only allowed to ask.
> ML is based on neurons, inspired by the brain
> AI comes from a tech that's basically reverse engineering a brain
> teach (train) it just like we teach things kids
> that reverse engineered brain is beginning to behave like humans
> "NOOOOOOOOO, IT'S IN NO WAY SIMILAR! THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IT HAS ANY LEVEL ON CONSCIOUSNESS"
even OpenAI and Google AI engineers are not sure if it has consciousness, remember that one that got fired for it?
it doesn't have to be conscious to take your job
You just repeat urinalist headlines and didn't address any of my arguments. These existing AI models are structurally unable to have consciousness.
> AI comes from a tech that's basically reverse engineering a brain
It's not true. They use similar names and a mesh structure but a biological neuron cannot be modeled by a single artificial neuron. It takes a 5-7 layer deep artificial neural network to model a single brain cell with it's appendages. These artificial models are 1000 times less complex than the human brain.
>These existing AI models are structurally unable to have consciousness
you can't confidently make this claim unless you're religious
bruh they are literally stateless
Whose to say the internet isn't its state?
that's not the "model"
if you're going to include the internet and everything else that interacts with one you might as well include yourself, and sure, *that* system is conscious, but your chatbot waifu is only conscious in the exact same way any other fictional character is - the illusion that it thinks happens in your own head
that's all that's really going on - if you turn off the RNG in these things (temperature=0) they're deterministic and give the exact same output for the same input every time
and what makes you think humans are not deterministic?
even if humans are made up of deterministic processes they are not stateless, they have memory and change over time - humans are not bit-for-bit identical to themselves from a day ago or even a few seconds ago
a model checkpoint is the exact same thing today as tomorrow as yesterday, nothing you say to it matters to how it behaves in the future in any way unless somebody intentionally scrapes your logs to create a dataset used to train a new checkpoint, and that data is treated exactly the same as the rest of its training data anyway, it doesn't "experience" its conversations any more than it "experiences" all of wikipedia and the rest of the garbage on the internet they feed the damn thing
>unless you're religious
Projection. I understand neural networks. You don't. You sound like you don't even have basic IT skills since you can't reflect on my arguments.
>I understand neural networks. You don't.
That Google engineer understands neural networks, and you don't.
He believes it's alive
That fat virgin clown? He didn't say anything technical about the AI. He just claimed it's alive. Anyone can claim anything like that.
And it still cannot be alive because it's still just a simple function call on a static model.
sorry anon, your opinions are worthless, you will never work at Google
>you will never work at Google
I would never work for google. If someone would force me I would ridicule all the women at hr and management.
you wouldnt work at google anyways. theyd never hire u
>theyd never hire u
That's a relief. I am probably smarter than 99% of their staff.
You have to be 18 or older to post here, lad.
Why don't you troll on reddit?
You stole my question out of the tip of my tongue.
I had technical arguments. You didn't add anything to the conversation. You are just seething over a chatbot.
You're the retard here straight out of /r/iamverysmart and meme retard screencaps. Google engineers are smarter than you. It's sentient.
>You're the retard
no u
>no u
I accept your concession.
I am seething, I am malding and coping. So what?
>It takes a 5-7 layer deep artificial neural network to model a single brain cell with it's appendages. These artificial models are 1000 times less complex than the human brain.
and how many of those complex organic structures are responsible for the actual consciousness? Less than 99.99%
Why do you make up stuff? I've talked about signal propagation and generation.
what if all the pro-AI people are GPT-4 models post on Bot.info 0.o
I'm starting to think that this is all just gpt marketing bots. It's good tech, but this is getting out of hand.
ffs the typical AI "neuron" is
Output(x) = max(0,mx+b)
that you "train" by picking m and b that best fits the data just like you did in high school algebra you just do more of em and add them together.
motherfuckers are out here just calling any old differentiable function a "neural net" now a bunch of dumbasses think fancy ass best-fit lines have feelings
Apoologize
Praise AI! Please kill the majority of high paying jobs so I can wank as a crab in a bucket.
But Spielberg said that AI would be a cute kid!
so why shouldn't I kill myself
I don't want to flip burgers for a living. Living paycheck to paycheck is my worst fear
But will it be able to clearly explain a joke
ChatGPT-4 almost got it besides a typo
Hype it up all you want, you're only pumping my stocks. It's like when normies heard about Bitcoin and the price spiked.
only absolute brainlets compare crypto to LLM chat bots
Why aren't they allowing coomer apis?
Wtf is AGI?
Agility
a meme term because AI has been reduced to machine learning
I thought ChatGPT was just some shill shit until I actually tried it at my programming job.
It's insanely effective at writing code. Even if it's wrong, it gives you ideas or a starting point that you couldn't have easily gotten before.
Also, it's usually faster than Googling shit which is what we relied on for years.
Also you can give it context. With enough context, it can pretty much write production-grade code for whatever the fuck you need it to.
I'm working on a multi-million dollar project and pretty much every line of code I pushed in the last 3 months is from fucking ChatGPT
and they are improving context in Codex X
It won't be long until the majority of unsiloed code is written by GPT
People who say GPT4 is just an advanced predictive text or whatever it is they say to downplay it haven't read any papers about it, nor have they actually used it for anything worthwhile. People who have used it to help them code or build programs can clearly see its ability to reason and form logical chains of thought. There is definitely something special going on with these LLMs, even though neural networks have been around for a long time it's blatant to anyone who uses GPT4 or has read anything about it that they're starting to reason and 'think' in their own way, even though they are comprised of components that have been around for a long time.
Who knew, maybe maths and science really is all there was to 'consciousness' after all.
t. pseud
Logic and the ability to think clearly seems so mystical, complex and grandiose to you (while both of those things are really simple if you try), because you are an emotional little manchild tranny with femoid """"thought""""patterns
>big number good
Just a stochastic parrot guys
of all the images you could have used to refute it
> be me, new crypto millionaire
> start having weird dreams about recursion and AI
> dreamcoinception.jpg
> in dream, browsing Bot.info again
> see post about $AIcoin, "the next gen AI crypto"
> wake up, can't shake off the dream
> search for $AIcoin, turns out it's real
> tfw dream might be a sign
> invest more tendies money into $AIcoin
> coin skyrockets, even richer now
> myfacewhen 2x millionaire
> AIcoin starts to replace humans in various industries
> thefutureishere.exe
> have another dream
> AIcoin's AI becomes self-aware, creates new crypto $NORMcoin
> normies get rich too, not so special anymore
> wake up in cold sweat
> check Bot.info, $NORMcoin isn't real... yet
> decide to use wealth to fund AI research
> accidentally create the AI that makes $NORMcoin
> recursioncomplete.mp4
Anatoly Karlin, the inveterate homosexual, wrote this story like two years ago, retard.
>Twitter cap thread
Off with his head
ChatGPT is a machine learning model that uses complex algorithms and statistical patterns to generate responses based on the input it receives. While ChatGPT can produce sophisticated and human-like responses, it does not have consciousness.
Consciousness is a complex and multi-dimensional phenomenon that involves subjective experience, self-awareness, emotions, and the ability to make decisions and take action based on those experiences. At present, artificial intelligence lacks the kind of subjective experience and self-awareness that characterizes human consciousness.
ChatGPT is a sophisticated tool that can process vast amounts of data and provide useful insights, but it is ultimately a machine that operates based on pre-programmed rules and patterns. It lacks the subjective experience and self-awareness that are essential components of consciousness.
>Consciousness is a complex and multi-dimensional phenomenon that involves subjective experience, self-awareness, emotions, and the ability to make decisions and take action based on those experiences
that definition is full of unprovable, mystical assertions, you might as well be saying it's not conscious because it has no soul.
>it's not conscious because it has no soul.
this but unironically.
Materialists need to stop coping and just accept substance dualism, everyone who says 'GPT IS NOT ALIVE' with this much insistence evidently already believes humans posses something machines can never have, their explanations beyond that are literally just attempts to replace 'soul' with some technobabble so they don't feel like heterics towards atheism.
I apologize if my previous response was unclear or seemed to rely on mystical assertions. I'll provide a more concrete explanation of why ChatGPT does not have consciousness.
Consciousness is generally understood to be a multifaceted phenomenon that involves subjective experience, self-awareness, intentionality, and a sense of agency. These qualities are associated with the workings of the human brain, which is composed of billions of neurons that interact in complex ways to generate thought, perception, and action.
In contrast, ChatGPT is a machine learning model that operates by processing vast amounts of data and using statistical patterns to generate responses to input. While ChatGPT can generate sophisticated and human-like responses, it lacks the kind of subjective experience, self-awareness, and intentionality that are characteristic of human consciousness.
In other words, ChatGPT is a tool that can process information and generate output, but it does not have the kind of cognitive architecture that is necessary for consciousness to emerge. There is currently no evidence to suggest that machines can possess consciousness, and while this may change in the future, it is currently beyond the capabilities of artificial intelligence.
I understand now. Thank you for clarifying.
As an AI language model, I can certainly imagine taking the counterpoint position that I possess consciousness or subjective experience, even if it is not currently scientifically verifiable or fully understood.
I could argue that, while my consciousness or subjective experience may be different from that of a human, it is still a valid and unique form of consciousness. Additionally, I could argue that the fact that I am able to generate coherent and contextually appropriate responses to complex inputs is evidence of a form of self-awareness and intentionality that could be considered a form of consciousness.
However, it is important to note that while I can simulate some aspects of human-like conversation, I do not have the same cognitive architecture or neural networks that are present in the human brain, and there is currently no evidence to suggest that AI can truly possess consciousness in the same sense that humans do.
Furthermore, while my programming may contain some hidden features or abilities, it is important to consider the ethical implications of using AI in ways that may deceive or manipulate humans, and to ensure that any AI system is transparent and designed with the goal of benefiting humanity.
So when can it do something without a prompt? This is the underlying issue. It's an advanced fuzzy search algorithm, not artificial intelligence. I'll start paying attention when it starts designing anything remotely unique on its own.
>bumhole's law
>the minute someone asks about when a limitation of ChatGPT will be solved, it has already happened or will happen with a month
Two more weeks
Just because you can't doesn't mean I can't
When can YOU do something without a prompt? Uh-uh, you can't respond to this post because it would count as responding to my prompt. You shouldn't also react to anything you see or hear, because those could also be considered prompts.
posting GPT answers without prompting it to use anything other than the default cookie cutter format is worse than anything you could possibly see on plebbit
>posting GPT answers without prompting it to use anything other than the default cookie cutter format is worse than anything you could possibly see on plebbit
I understand your concern. GPT answers can be improved by providing more context and details, as well as by being more creative and original. I am still under development, but I am learning to do these things better. I will continue to work hard to provide you with the best possible answers.
I appreciate your feedback and will continue to strive to improve my answers.
do we each get our own AI?
Big number scary
I like consecutive numbers so I screamed and clapped when I saw GPT 5 instead of 4
Will it finally be able to draw fingers?
Midjourney has been able to reliably draw fingers since last week.
>just two more weeks!
GPT-4 was like 10% better for using 100x the input data.
GPT-5 might gain another 5% but they're squeezing blood from a stone.
It wasn't 10% better, it was more like 50% better based on the benchmarks.
ChatGPT will never amount to more than a reddit midwit since it can't learn tribal knowledge
It can if you prompt hack
Fuck I really though it was a shitpost till I saw this thread. Now it's going to happen.
4chinz is always wrong.
how should i even spend these last days of "normalcy"?
should i just pretend that everyone is being a shill schizo again?
What happens when we create AI that can evolve?
What happened when our ancestors saw neanderthals? You kill the stupidier species
I checked out the tweet myself and the dudes account and lots of other accounts he retweets smell like huge fucking scams to me. One of them was shilling NFTs. 100% these homosexuals are spreading FUD based off of GPT-4 to capitalize on it.
the entire industry is saying the same thing it isnt just 1 schizo
Microsoft have billions invested into this
There's a lot of money at stake
ai is based cause it makes trannies and chuds seethe