https://www.businessinsider.com/google-management-issues-code-red-over-chatgpt-report-2022-12
There's no doubt that they'll succeed.
How over will it be for us once they do?
https://www.businessinsider.com/google-management-issues-code-red-over-chatgpt-report-2022-12
There's no doubt that they'll succeed.
How over will it be for us once they do?
How did they lose the great minds (kaiser et al) that basically created the very foundations for chatgpt, and are directly or indirectly leading the latest developments (like kaiser).
Poor and ineffectual management leading to the actually good devs working the system, making enough cash to support themselves then fleeing to make a product they can support and continue developing properly, instead of Google releasing a perpetual beta only to kill it off a few months later.
>Google
Considering 98% of what Google does has been failure, odds are it will be yet another killed by Google project.
But the 2% is REALLY successful.
>But the 2% is REALLY successful.
not with the Jeet CEO
reminding me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJKx3DGQNf0
Reading more into the Google rabbithole, found this here in a Google memo:
>Just as some on the Right deny science that runs counter to the “God > humans > environment” hierarchy (e.g., evolution and climate change), the Left tends to deny science concerning biological differences between people (e.g., IQ and sex differences).
This is unironically the problem. Google snaps up the some of the best engineers and then mismanages them so that they never really accomplish anything but a bunch of test projects that sound pretty cool.
GPT won't replace Google Search.
You know what AI-related project Google can replace?
Stockfish
Dust off AlphaZero and grab the TCEC title Google.
AlphaZero would get crushed if Stockfish was running on the same hardware.
Can you elaborate? I dont know what you're talking about
TCEC = Top Chess Engine Championship
Google used to have the best chess engine, then they shelved it and let Stockfish get to 4000 Elo.
Why should they waste money on not playing games? We are already past the point where bots are just toys we experiment with. Doing eternal race to make better more expensive bits that move chess pieces is dumb and waste of money.
For the same reason countries still compete in the World Cup. Getting a championship title does wonder for business.
They are already the defacto too tech company out there, only rivalled by Microsoft and Apple. They don’t need more publicity.
Google: use AI to censor itself
ChatGPT: use AI to build a search engine and censor manually
gee I wonder why google is in "code red"
Given Google research literally invented the techniques chatgpt is built on, this isn't surprising at all. I'd expect to see a google equivalent of every openAI product, including Dall-E in 2023/24
As per google, they have AI capable of managing vision, speech and text at he same time. That I feel could be a huge advantage to them if used right. Like prompting the AI in speech or text, then it would generate the art which could again be used as input for refinement.
Google had AI ready before ChatGPT but chose not to release it over reputational risk. Now that ChatGPT has released they feel they need to release their own version ASAP.
However I think openai can be very competitive with Google especially with GPT-4 releasing soon. Hopefully this means that AI will remain free to the public for the near future at least
>Google develops AI
>afraid of their creation
>suppresses its own technology
>others continue to develop AI
>Google gets left behind
>"GAIS AI CODE RED I"M SCARED"
>There's no doubt that they'll succeed.
There is actually tons of doubt. Google has become an inefficient and lumbering enterprise that's been unable to internally innovate at all for decades. The only way they manage to produce new things is by acquiring interesting startups.
If they manage to snipe most of the employees of OpenAI or something then they might "succeed" by basically just buying the competition, but if they try to make a competing product internally from scratch, they will almost certainly fail.
Dude, the guy at openai now working on chatgpt came from google brain (research). Lukasz kaiser was one of the authors of the seminal paper in 2017 on transformers(the t in gpt) that opened the way for gpt, bert, and the likes.
>the guy at openai now working on chatgpt came from google brain (research)
Yes, that's exactly my point. Smart people feel the need to *leave* google in order to actually get something done.
Indeed, fair point.
Overall, yea fair point. But just to clarify, the innovation was done in 2017 when people like kaiser and shazeer(now leading character.ai) were at google brain. But who knows why google had that "brain drain".
They already have a competing product that was ready earlier this year. But they were too pussy to release it especially after that employee claimed it was sentient
Everyday I wish for demise of "Google" and its employees.
It will just get replaced by openai and do the same shit or worse
You.com already beat them
Here's the problem.
>Be Google
>massive conglomerate that once made good tech and looked after it
>Have a few good products still
>Everything new looks fancy, gets a fancy trailer, has it's 5 minutes of fame in news articles
>Releases as a beta, that kinda works, is missing features, gets a user base
>Because of Google's braindead management and performance review system, anyone who could actually maintain the product into a workable state flee like rats on a sinking ship, leaving it in the hands of either interns or nobody.
>Product limps along for a few months/years
>Starts dropping users
>Google announces it's dead and sets a deprecate by date and kills it
>Google wonders why none of it's new products takes off, learns exactly 0 in the process and starts it over with some new shit.
It happens like fucking clockwork and it's because Pitchai is too busy shitting on a street to fix how Google's management and product maintenance works.
I used to get excited over google's upcoming products, but there's no point any more because they'll be half-baked and killed off before they become anything.
tiktok will win eventually
>sign up for gmail
>computer and phone get compromised
>I'm fucked
>can't turn the phone option off
>sign up for outlook
>go passwordless with either 2 factor that's enabled with biometrics or yubikey
>I'm not fucked I think unless I lose my stuff
I know which jeet I prefer
Will Cortana be back AIbros? Have her live in Windows 11/Linux 6.2 as a ChatGPT application completely bypassing the need to ever type google.com
Poojeeet
Stadia
they've been working on language processing AI with massive budget for the past 5 years they just need a frontend