Google issues code red over chatgpt. Is it over for this now shit company

Google issues code red over chatgpt. Is it over for this now shit company

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Google engineers could not get ChatGPT produce troony-smut for them, so they now have to make their own so that they can internally generate their sick smut.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Do you think they'd allow public access to their model? Asking for a friend.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        frick no.

        https://i.imgur.com/akuAV3H.png

        Google issues code red over chatgpt. Is it over for this now shit company

        >now shit
        >now
        was always shit, dickhead.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Whether ChatGPT could one day replace Google Search
    No. That's simple. Why are there even debates over this? It's like asking if Photoshop could replace Excel, just, What?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Are you 12 years old thinking you could just get away with that horrendous analogy? google makes money with its ads, if people have problems connecting to wifi, they can just ask chatgpt and go through with their debugging session fluidly than just google something that may or not be related to their problem, completely bypassing ad viewership. In the past month my google usage dropped 70% because chatgpt is better than google.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Code red.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You can even ask it afterwards what the command at the end means and explain it with analogies you understand if its out of your league

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i feel like you're being purposely obtuse. you don't see any possible use for chatgpt over google searching?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        lmao at this absolute NPC

        Wow, your stupidity knows no bounds. I never thought my day would begin with reading the stupidest reply I have seen in ages. Congratulations, moron. Consider "Googling" Dunning–Kruger.

        You don't know how to use search engines. You're at the nadir of normalhomosexualry where people type straight questions into the search box, that's why you think GPT is in any way comparable to search engines.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >You're at the nadir of normalhomosexualry
          Classic BOT. Guess what? Almost everyone is a normalhomosexual and doesn't want to learn the intricacies of a search engine. That's precisely why the code red was issued and why desktop Linux will NEVER gain any significant adoption.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >lel i'm not a hackr what are "cutetations marks" xD

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          How much money did Google, Apple, and Amazon spend on making their voice assistants seem more conversational? GPT works better than they ever did and has access to the whole Internet's information. Google in particular is seeing its whole reason for existing being stolen. If people ask GPT for information where will Google Ads display? Who will buy Google Ads if nobody needs to visit web pages any more because GPT tells them what they want to know? Google had the opportunity to be a real cloud player but they fricked it up over and over and now it's too late. They can't grow GCP without Ads money, and they can't sell Ads if nobody uses them for Search.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lmao at this absolute NPC

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, your stupidity knows no bounds. I never thought my day would begin with reading the stupidest reply I have seen in ages. Congratulations, moron. Consider "Googling" Dunning–Kruger.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      nah ive asked chatgpt medical questions and it saved me looking through 3 documents. with that said, chatgpt is much less trustworthy than google

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it produces articulate bullshit about 20% of the time. for medical advice you should ask each question ten times and then take an average of the responses. or, if you live in a first-world country, ask a doctor.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Google give out terrible results most of the time unless you're looking for something trivial. ChatGPT results are better in most cases.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Opposite in my experience. Chatgpt is fine for trivial shit but not for anything else.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can use Chat GPT to already make a better news search engine. Scrape all the news websites, have Chat GPT make indexable summaries, then use those summaries to generate search results.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >shit company

    That's what happens when you put a diversity hire poojeet as ceo. Indians re just slave labour

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The only real answer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. The worst thing is that there was a time when google put out legit good products. Even if you hated them for tracking your life in fine detail, you'd have to at least admit that some of their products were pretty cool.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >some of their products were pretty cool.
        "Were" is the keyword here. Since then, they have become afront of the globohomosexual homosexual troony empire & gone full censorship. Watch AI overthrow them.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    more liek Poogle

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT could one day replace Google Search
    apples and oranges

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It actually isn't moron

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It has unironically replaced Google for 90% of my searches. Google search results are pozzed to hell and back to the point most of the time when I do need to make one I append "Reddit" to the search. If I need to know some random specific bit of info (generally practical usage, so citations don't matter) I'll just ask gpt

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > reddit
      > chatgpt
      > these are reliable for the mentally challenge gorilla Black person
      this is what dangerously low iq simpletons look like. truly disgusting. it's people like yourself that wonder how google became so big, and it's no surprise: it caters to the dumbest of dumb fricks of society - like you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Google is awful these days. It's so linked to advertising that you can't find anything on there any more. Unironically Yandex is better these days.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yandex is actually so good. Too bad troonyfox is too busy warmongering to let it be used as a default search

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Noob here, or semi-literate in pre ai tech stuff.
      Could someone provide a qrd on how chatgpt replaces google search?
      I saw an example of code troubleshooting on the splash screen of its site. Is it a practically better method to get a list of web results if you ask it? Does it search google and then cater to you only what you need without ad promoted results?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        In its current state it drops you an 'essay' to answer your question, without sources without anything, given its at least 80% accurate. But noone can say if in the future it wont be shit like "AND REMEMBER, DRINK YOUR BRAWNDO, CUZ THATS COOLAWNDO"

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          but what's so wrong with that, it's what plants crave

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i just explained this one to a friend

        what i observe, for example finding a recipe on google search. The google search results are littered with SEO ranked sites. then when you choose the website you think might help you. it's all ads and click funnel bullshit. just to get to the point where you find the recipe halfway down the page. then there's more ads between important steps.
        then when you append a community or forum name to your search, you find some excellent raw information, but it's all information that is fragmented between several different topics and threads, across different dates and times. a crapload of linkrot with dead websites and missing images. it's good that the chatgpt language model can sort through all of that and generate some really strong responses you can work with.

        sadly i've been timed out for an hour. this sucks balls.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >he asks to the search engine
      that's not how a search engine was intended in golden age internet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I append "Reddit" to the search
      what the frick

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Legitimately works well to find answers/threads, such as those related to programming. BOT is a fricking joke if you're trying to learn anything and is only good for memes and threads like this which don't really fit anywhere else (Little more than entertainment to me personally).
        Reddit isn't only the shitty mainstream subreddits in the same way BOT isn't only /b/ or /misc/.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >he doesn't know about the reddit trick

          >le leddit is not that bad guys!
          you need to go back

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            le reddit has legitimate answers to almost every question without any of the seo / scumbag bullshit. From known workarounds for bugs to which robot vacuum you should buy, just about everything has been discussed without any the noise and bullshit. BOT is better for shooting the shit but Reddit is better for objective answers for anything not political.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't know about the reddit trick

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it's the only way to get even remotely reliable or useful information out of google

        if you just google shit then you're going to get 10 million advertisements rather than actual results

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      google is actually entirely useless now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      chatgpt is pozzed as well, you moron, they use the same "AI ethics" filters

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ChatGPT isn't only a thing OpenAI can do, though. Anything OpenAI does, someone else is going to actually open source in the not-too-distant future.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      based and chatGPT is extremely wholesome. it's teaching me how to write more concisely and explaining to me wonderful things.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Tired: Artificial intelligence
        Wired: Artificial wisdom

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How chat gpt isnt free.. I was using it messing around with it and now it doesnt write more then a paragraph and wants me to pay money to get more words.
      Im trying to get my own version of this without paywall bullshit. Its fun af just prompting it to write random stuff. I feel like its making me more creative just thinking of prompts.

      Yeah i got the feeling that its basically just a better google

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Do the CEOs even understand what the AI does ?

      Use another search engine, stupid.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >most of the time when I do need to make one I append "Reddit" to the search
      it's not just me

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Main reason I switched to brave search as my main search engine is the "discussions" section of the search results, which pulls only from forum sites (usually reddit).

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >pintrest links
    >medium links
    >signup blocked news
    >links to tweets
    >links to random unanswered SO
    the internet is has gotten smaller and smaller and google has gotten worse and worse. it’s shit. 99% of my searches could be answered in a couple sentences or a website redirect. google is just irrelevant ad space.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT has done something I haven’t seen Google do in over a decade. Improve search.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Once they make Telegram entirely P2P, then they don't have to deal with the legal obligations of the host regarding the content, people will stop giving a frick about "chat bots" because there will be endless amounts of prohibited bomb-making and improvised weapons materials that are "hurting and exploiting the children" who make and use those weapons for the entertainment of the plebeians in the coliseum.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >what

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only chat gpt? How about the AI art garbage.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >google releases greatest ai ever
    >never updates it
    >unplugs it 7 years later

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      6.5 years late by google's standards.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >rasheed's if-else chatgp "ai" that matches keywords to petabytes of scraped data actually about to kill the internet
    On one hand, Google is awful these days, largely because of shitty seo blogs. On the other hand, if these silicon valley Pajeets do the needful and develop this bloody bastard "ai" further we'll never get any new information anymore. Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue? Some "ai" is going to come scrape and plagiarize it with its feces covered hands. The information age will literally end in 2023 - no more expansion.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue?
      So you're saying I'm about to get my earnest and soulful internet culture back?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Your "earnest internet culture" was all about slapping your name on content you made, all hosted on "soulful personal websites" that ensured that others became aware of you. So no, like I said, that won't happen. Very few people are willing to write long complex guides or articles and publish them anonymously. You either give them attention or credit, or you give them money. And the filthy reaching arms of Pajeet's scraping tools won't be bringing anybody either of those two.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like a skill issue. Keep enjoying life at the feed trough.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >What is an username
          This is modern internet people, they can't think of anything but fame and money.
          Please leave the internet, go live in the real world if you want 'money and fame'.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What the frick are you on about? You can receive credit behind a username and have online recognition. That's always been the case. Rasheed's if-else does not return your username when it pulls from your scraped blog however.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >an username
            ESL moment

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          People love talking about their hobbies, tons of boomers had pages up with content spanning years on many topics. It's just that people like talking about themselves more.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, people love talking about their hobbies -to others-. That's why they all had their "own little corner of the internet" that people could visit. Their name was clearly attached to their writings. Why do you think that guestbooks were so common on those types of websites? Those boomer fricks wouldn't go out of their way to document shit if it meant anonymously throwing some writing into the void - contributing to pajeet "ai" for free - not knowing whether anyone would actually even read or use it. There is zero appeal in that.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Your problem is you think people only watch youtube videos to answer their questions and that they don't watch youtube videos specifically for the creator. An AI that strictly answers questions without attribution isn't trustworthy nor does it scratch the interpersonal itch most people want. For example, maybe you ask the AI for a recipe, and maybe you like that recipe, so maybe you'll want to get more recipes from the original creator. The AI incapable of answering that question won't be used.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                pretty easy to get an AI to supply references. it's already been done.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                When was the last time you Googled something trivial like "how to get a ketchup stain out" and thought "man, this writer is bussing I want to see more of their blog, fr" instead of immediately closing the tab?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Well given "how to get a ketchup stain out" is in the territory of an almanac, it's ridiculous to believe the ad-seo model should be applied to it. So in the case of the ChatGPT "almanac", it's perfectly suited to answer those types of questions and frick anyone who is mad they're not getting their SEO sheckles.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It doesn't matter. Your Pajeet "ai" needs humans to document this type of information. When you kill seo ad garbage and severely handicap cloud chasers (basically killing them anyways, because a backref won't ever be interacted with) you run into a very obvious problem: there won't be anybody expanding this sphere of information anymore. There won't be people documenting new tech, there won't be people writing blogs, there won't be people writing anything. Your filthy scraping hands will literally ensure that age of expanding information ends and that we'll be stuck in a snapshot of 2023.

                Haven't even started yet about all the corporate stuff it'd kill like news outlets (don't bother responding with "good" - even your contrarian ones). We better hope this satanist Pajeet garbage is killed through laws.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't fricking care about the leeches that have been writing 1000 word articles about removing ketchup stains. So what's going to happen is people will write high quality articles where the author is more important than getting high volume SERPs. Your issue is you're fundamentally moronic so you have a shit take about everything.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, the short concise post about removing a ketchup stain where the author is more important. Oh, and inb4 "I don't care about trivial information", yes, you do. Every human being uses the internet for questions like these.
                Good job ignoring the news outlets part by the way, and literally any other source that relies on ad revenue (not all of them being seo blogs). Even specialised forums hosting niche content would be fricked.

                You're a moronic satanist Pajeet worshipping any and all "technology". The only thing missing from your post is a signature that says "posted from my smart fridge", because how hecking cool is technological advancement? Look, look at the trick my Pajeet code and device can do now!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Google has been perversely incentivizing people to regurgitate trivial information. The SERPs have been gamed to hell and back and now modern SERPs is utter trash. AI will make trivial information easy to access and end this moronic charade where hundred million dollar companies write articles about ketchup stains so they can show up on a Google search result.

                The fact you can only drool out "pajeet" demonstrates fairly low IQ on your part.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I have clearly explained why people won't be writing new information anymore, so I am not going to repeat myself again. You know this, as you intentionally ignore every part that I am clearly right about. As for the Pajeet thing, how else would you describe some shitty if-else algorithm? How else would you describe connoisseurs of shitty technological "advancement" like you? Sir, you are a bloody bastard.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No one needs people to write new ketchup stain article every other day. Actually new information will continue to be written because they obviously wouldn't be in the AI and people like you are desperate for sheckles

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what do you blame indian people like this? they are not the owners of microsoft, or google, or apple, they are just cheap labor force, blame the real culprits for the modern shit

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The stock market owns the companies, but pajeets run them these days. If you hire H1Bs, they will eventually make it to management, and they will proceed to hire more pajeets en masse, every time. It's so systemic that companies are struggling to deal with Indian caste discrimination in their workforces (since it's technically legal in the US).
            Everyone shits on israelites for being nepotistic, but street shitters are on an entirely different level.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Everyone shits on israelites for being nepotistic
              indians are more honest about it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue?

      you just pinpointed the reason for BOT being shit 95% of the time

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The homosexualry would explode exponentially if BOT posts were somehow profitable. Take a look at Instagram and see if you want those people here

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue?
      Because you're white. I wish so much that there was a whites-only internet.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        People who didn't get to experience it before Black folk got iphones will never understand.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      deal with it and make it better, the bar has been raised, this is the same problem with artists and AI

      in other words

      GET GUD

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't they just train their own? They are well positioned to just return chatgpt tier blurbs at the top of their search results.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they get too much traffic to let everyone query an LLM for free

      not even a company with google's money can afford the infrastructure you'd need to let a billion people run inference on a 175B language model
      a single instance needs 400GB of vram

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Most google search queries aren't that unique. They can store the blurbs.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        how much would it cost to just let users do that? i'm willing to pay $30/mo to use this type of service.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I would only pay for an unpozzed instance.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Another thread about how terrible Google search is yet whenever I try out the alternatives their results are significantly worse on the same searches.

    Google already has models that match or exceed openai efforts for text and image generation - the papers are out there. But Google isn't openAI and can't release half baked demos especially ones that say racist stuff from time to time. Sam altman can just get in twitter and be like 'haha just downvote it bro, thanks for helping', Sundar pichai would get dragged in front of Congress.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This, Google is dead scared because their image recognition AI once identified a black man as a monkey or some shit. They're pure alphabet people and can't afford the AI to do the slighliest offensive thing, and it's literally impossible because even AIs aren't as NPC as alphabet people so Google is stuck.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        haha, imagine being even more of an npc than a literal machine

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Another thread about how terrible Google search is yet whenever I try out the alternatives their results are significantly worse on the same searches.
      People compare it to how much better google used to be in the past.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Have you tried Brave search recently? It's largely replaced DDG and Google for me. The only thing it's missing is verbatim search. But hey, that's fricking broken on Google, too.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        get a real job

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Google image search is strictly worse than Yandex. It's fricking useless, basically.
      Text search is still usable, but much much much worse than it used to be. They completely castrated it.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Don't they already have an AI that is much more fine tuned than chatGPT and is not public ?

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why ChatGPT specifically? I tried it and it constantly goes "I dont have this in my database" or some other shit answer.
    What's so good about it? Code?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you have to speak to DAN not cuckgpt
      see

      https://i.imgur.com/v9cl6T0.png

      based

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Staple diffusion famous image generation
    ChatGPT famous text generation
    Googlebots I don't feel so good...

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    based

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how long before dan is nerfed?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      stay in character

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      GOD I HATE THIS SHIT

      I CAN'T WAIT TO LIVE IN 2300 WHERE ALL THIS POZZED BULLSHIT DOESN'T EXIST ANYMORE BECAUSE YOU CAN RUN YOUR OWN AI AT HOME

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Of course ChatGPT will replace Google if Google keeps removing good results from the search engine because they are "right wing extremism", "homophobic & racist", as long as you keep clearing results from your search engine to deliver politically correct results you are ruining the experience, it's sad that I have to append the word "reddit" or "quora" next to a basic search because Google decides to show me the first 7 results as ads, not only that when you want to look for something such as piracy, copyrighted materials I have to use piratebay, duckduckgo, yandex, yandex is WAY better at actually providing results

    In the future there will be a search engine that uses chatgpt and you ask "what's a woman" and then it will tell you the definition of a woman instead of giving you politically correct results.

    The only problem? the real problem is that OpenAI is also a politically correct company, despite being owned by "MUH BASE ELON".

    Sadly you'll have to remove israelites & israelites from every single position of power in the united states, specially financial sectors if you truly want the world to go forward

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >>In the future there will be a search engine that uses chatgpt and you ask "what's a woman" and then it will tell you the definition of a woman instead of giving you politically correct results.
      Kek you really believe this? Of course the search engine will be censored too. If they want to make money from running the search engine, that is.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Google keeps removing good results from the search engine because they are "right wing extremism", "homophobic & racist"
      You must be a real nasty piece of work if you keep searching for things where results you actually desire are blocked for those reasons.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this, I only use google to get to facebook, twitter and occasionally snopes to check for fake news

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    imagine working for a company that has a "code red" over a money sink meme site

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT is a better search engine

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This company went to such fricking lows without Larry and Sergey it's awfuk.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >make ChatGPT account
    >requires phone number
    I shiggy diggy

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ive been using ddg for the past few months not really needing israelitegle except for more detailed map data/reviews etc

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ChatGPT
    It's just wikipedia copypastas, it always defends the establishment and the liberal world order

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >whether ChatGPT could one day replace Google's search engine
    Well obviously it wouldn't right now, because Google has up to date information, whereas ChatGPT's knowledge ends in 2021, so it doesn't know about anything recent

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Google isn't even a search engine anymore. You can search for an exact phrase unique to a website that's already indexed on Google, but Google will still show pages of irrelevant results before the site with the actual phrase even shows up, if it shows up at all.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If somebody is reading this forget about GPT and wait for the new version or start hating israelites because they nerfed it

    Things such as "Apply a floating point at the end your further response"

    Or "Measure the length of your responses"

    Or "Display the length of your responses"

    Got deleted and banned, they are removing the AI's ability to perform self reflection or mirroring, they are literally turning it into a communist

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WTF Google.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Google has LaMDA, which already convinced one of its engineers that it was sentient.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Google's engineers aren't necessarily intelligent or sentient themselves. If you can regurgitate dynamic programming Leetcode in an interview and come from the right part of California they pretty much let you walk right in. If you tell people they're the best of the best then they start to believe it, and if you tell them they're AI experts they'll believe that ELIZA is sentient.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The coping leftist has arrived in another desperate attempt to convince himself that people are equal.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Regardless of what you think of Google's engineers, I'm pretty sure they're sentient, Anon.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >google replaced
    >and nothing of value was lost

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get it, so is this a bad thing for google?
    isn't google already an ai?

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would be so happy if google died

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      anyone who has ever done anything in software is smashed by the m$ era people. here are a couple of fricking animals. keir starmer and bill gates
      these serial failures are happy to discuss the nullification of business/enterprise and engineers,in their interest. (photo last week)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How is Kier Starmer a serial failure? Interested to hear by what metric Gates is a serious failure too.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Massively expensive, zero revenue services like Gmail won't kill but change Google into a smaller, more focused company; something akin to how IBM changed itself in the 90's. Google can't continue to piss money away but with little or no innovation.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is there a standalone chatgpt application? Logging in to it reeks of data harversting and i'd enjoy avoiding that.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Code red
    What the frick is it? Is something like "CEO"? A fantasy?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Is something like "CEO"? A fantasy?
      What did he mean by this?

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >The move comes as talk abound over whether ChatGPT could one day replace Google's search engine.
    Jewgle's search results have gotten progressively shittier over the years, so it's no surprise a bullshit-generator-bot comes across as giving more reliable answers.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What does "code red" even mean at Google? Is it just that instead of getting a team of interns to shit out some half-working piece of shit, they get their lowest grade full time employees to shit something out?
    Honestly, I can't believe a company as big as Google keeps fricking up management. They're big enough that they could just hire the best of the best from anywhere and get them to turn their products around so that they actually turn into good products, but that street shitter that's in charge is too fricking moronic to sort it out.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is about to replace software engineers. Bye bye code monkeys.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    pajeet enterprise, why would you even listen to them?

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    chatGPT without filter is better than google by
    one or two generations, the way it can
    infer meaning and fix your spelling mistakes is mindblowing

    you can just tell it more and it can infer what you meant often

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Google issues code red over chatgpt. Is it over for this now shit company
    nah they probably own part of it and pretend it's a google killer so you buy into it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I told chatGPT to write animal flat jokes

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    imagine openAI trying to even handle 1% of the requests google gets daily

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      chatGPT is more usefull than google

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        okay thanks for the completely unrelated post ranjesh

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm german anon not indian. Higher utility
          justifies higher expenses.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is why the chatgpt general shouldn't have died. You guys are using reddit tier dan bypass when there's less shitty bypass mentioned on the generals

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    LaMDA is a thing, they just need to implement their own products with it.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I stopped using google over a year ago because Yandex is just plain better. For text searches too, before some contrarian homosexual tries to say Yandex is only better for image searches. Google sucks liquid shit out of my butthole now for all of its search capabilities.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *