Google issues code red over chatgpt. Is it over for this now shit company Posted on December 29, 2022 by Anonymous Google issues code red over chatgpt. Is it over for this now shit company
Google engineers could not get ChatGPT produce chud-smut for them, so they now have to make their own so that they can internally generate their sick smut.
Do you think they'd allow public access to their model? Asking for a friend.
was always shit, dickhead.
>Whether ChatGPT could one day replace Google Search
No. That's simple. Why are there even debates over this? It's like asking if Photoshop could replace Excel, just, What?
Are you 12 years old thinking you could just get away with that horrendous analogy? google makes money with its ads, if people have problems connecting to wifi, they can just ask chatgpt and go through with their debugging session fluidly than just google something that may or not be related to their problem, completely bypassing ad viewership. In the past month my google usage dropped 70% because chatgpt is better than google.
You can even ask it afterwards what the command at the end means and explain it with analogies you understand if its out of your league
i feel like you're being purposely obtuse. you don't see any possible use for chatgpt over google searching?
You don't know how to use search engines. You're at the nadir of normalgayry where people type straight questions into the search box, that's why you think GPT is in any way comparable to search engines.
>You're at the nadir of normalgayry
Classic BOT. Guess what? Almost everyone is a normalgay and doesn't want to learn the intricacies of a search engine. That's precisely why the code red was issued and why desktop Linux will NEVER gain any significant adoption.
>lel i'm not a hackr what are "cutetations marks" xD
How much money did Google, Apple, and Amazon spend on making their voice assistants seem more conversational? GPT works better than they ever did and has access to the whole Internet's information. Google in particular is seeing its whole reason for existing being stolen. If people ask GPT for information where will Google Ads display? Who will buy Google Ads if nobody needs to visit web pages any more because GPT tells them what they want to know? Google had the opportunity to be a real cloud player but they fucked it up over and over and now it's too late. They can't grow GCP without Ads money, and they can't sell Ads if nobody uses them for Search.
lmao at this absolute NPC
Wow, your stupidity knows no bounds. I never thought my day would begin with reading the stupidest reply I have seen in ages. Congratulations, retard. Consider "Googling" Dunning–Kruger.
nah ive asked chatgpt medical questions and it saved me looking through 3 documents. with that said, chatgpt is much less trustworthy than google
it produces articulate bullshit about 20% of the time. for medical advice you should ask each question ten times and then take an average of the responses. or, if you live in a first-world country, ask a doctor.
Google give out terrible results most of the time unless you're looking for something trivial. ChatGPT results are better in most cases.
Opposite in my experience. Chatgpt is fine for trivial shit but not for anything else.
You can use Chat GPT to already make a better news search engine. Scrape all the news websites, have Chat GPT make indexable summaries, then use those summaries to generate search results.
That's what happens when you put a diversity hire poojeet as ceo. Indians re just slave labour
The only real answer
This. The worst thing is that there was a time when google put out legit good products. Even if you hated them for tracking your life in fine detail, you'd have to at least admit that some of their products were pretty cool.
>some of their products were pretty cool.
"Were" is the keyword here. Since then, they have become afront of the globohomo gay chud empire & gone full censorship. Watch AI overthrow them.
more liek Poogle
ChatGPT could one day replace Google Search
apples and oranges
It actually isn't retard
It has unironically replaced Google for 90% of my searches. Google search results are pozzed to hell and back to the point most of the time when I do need to make one I append "Reddit" to the search. If I need to know some random specific bit of info (generally practical usage, so citations don't matter) I'll just ask gpt
> these are reliable for the mentally challenge gorilla moron
this is what dangerously low iq simpletons look like. truly disgusting. it's people like yourself that wonder how google became so big, and it's no surprise: it caters to the dumbest of dumb fucks of society - like you.
Google is awful these days. It's so linked to advertising that you can't find anything on there any more. Unironically Yandex is better these days.
Yandex is actually so good. Too bad chudfox is too busy warmongering to let it be used as a default search
Noob here, or semi-literate in pre ai tech stuff.
Could someone provide a qrd on how chatgpt replaces google search?
I saw an example of code troubleshooting on the splash screen of its site. Is it a practically better method to get a list of web results if you ask it? Does it search google and then cater to you only what you need without ad promoted results?
In its current state it drops you an 'essay' to answer your question, without sources without anything, given its at least 80% accurate. But noone can say if in the future it wont be shit like "AND REMEMBER, DRINK YOUR BRAWNDO, CUZ THATS COOLAWNDO"
but what's so wrong with that, it's what plants crave
i just explained this one to a friend
what i observe, for example finding a recipe on google search. The google search results are littered with SEO ranked sites. then when you choose the website you think might help you. it's all ads and click funnel bullshit. just to get to the point where you find the recipe halfway down the page. then there's more ads between important steps.
then when you append a community or forum name to your search, you find some excellent raw information, but it's all information that is fragmented between several different topics and threads, across different dates and times. a crapload of linkrot with dead websites and missing images. it's good that the chatgpt language model can sort through all of that and generate some really strong responses you can work with.
sadly i've been timed out for an hour. this sucks balls.
>he asks to the search engine
that's not how a search engine was intended in golden age internet
>I append "Reddit" to the search
what the fuck
Legitimately works well to find answers/threads, such as those related to programming. BOT is a fucking joke if you're trying to learn anything and is only good for memes and threads like this which don't really fit anywhere else (Little more than entertainment to me personally).
Reddit isn't only the shitty mainstream subreddits in the same way BOT isn't only /b/ or 4chan.
>le leddit is not that bad guys!
you need to go back
le reddit has legitimate answers to almost every question without any of the seo / scumbag bullshit. From known workarounds for bugs to which robot vacuum you should buy, just about everything has been discussed without any the noise and bullshit. BOT is better for shooting the shit but Reddit is better for objective answers for anything not political.
>he doesn't know about the reddit trick
it's the only way to get even remotely reliable or useful information out of google
if you just google shit then you're going to get 10 million advertisements rather than actual results
google is actually entirely useless now
chatgpt is pozzed as well, you retard, they use the same "AI ethics" filters
ChatGPT isn't only a thing OpenAI can do, though. Anything OpenAI does, someone else is going to actually open source in the not-too-distant future.
based and chatGPT is extremely wholesome. it's teaching me how to write more concisely and explaining to me wonderful things.
Tired: Artificial intelligence
Wired: Artificial wisdom
How chat gpt isnt free.. I was using it messing around with it and now it doesnt write more then a paragraph and wants me to pay money to get more words.
Im trying to get my own version of this without paywall bullshit. Its fun af just prompting it to write random stuff. I feel like its making me more creative just thinking of prompts.
Yeah i got the feeling that its basically just a better google
Do the CEOs even understand what the AI does ?
Use another search engine, stupid.
>most of the time when I do need to make one I append "Reddit" to the search
it's not just me
Main reason I switched to brave search as my main search engine is the "discussions" section of the search results, which pulls only from forum sites (usually reddit).
>signup blocked news
>links to tweets
>links to random unanswered SO
the internet is has gotten smaller and smaller and google has gotten worse and worse. it’s shit. 99% of my searches could be answered in a couple sentences or a website redirect. google is just irrelevant ad space.
ChatGPT has done something I haven’t seen Google do in over a decade. Improve search.
Once they make Telegram entirely P2P, then they don't have to deal with the legal obligations of the host regarding the content, people will stop giving a fuck about "chat bots" because there will be endless amounts of prohibited bomb-making and improvised weapons materials that are "hurting and exploiting the children" who make and use those weapons for the entertainment of the plebeians in the coliseum.
Only chat gpt? How about the AI art garbage.
>google releases greatest ai ever
>never updates it
>unplugs it 7 years later
6.5 years late by google's standards.
>rasheed's if-else chatgp "ai" that matches keywords to petabytes of scraped data actually about to kill the internet
On one hand, Google is awful these days, largely because of shitty seo blogs. On the other hand, if these silicon valley Pajeets do the needful and develop this bloody bastard "ai" further we'll never get any new information anymore. Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue? Some "ai" is going to come scrape and plagiarize it with its feces covered hands. The information age will literally end in 2023 - no more expansion.
>Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue?
So you're saying I'm about to get my earnest and soulful internet culture back?
Your "earnest internet culture" was all about slapping your name on content you made, all hosted on "soulful personal websites" that ensured that others became aware of you. So no, like I said, that won't happen. Very few people are willing to write long complex guides or articles and publish them anonymously. You either give them attention or credit, or you give them money. And the filthy reaching arms of Pajeet's scraping tools won't be bringing anybody either of those two.
Sounds like a skill issue. Keep enjoying life at the feed trough.
>What is an username
This is modern internet people, they can't think of anything but fame and money.
Please leave the internet, go live in the real world if you want 'money and fame'.
What the fuck are you on about? You can receive credit behind a username and have online recognition. That's always been the case. Rasheed's if-else does not return your username when it pulls from your scraped blog however.
People love talking about their hobbies, tons of boomers had pages up with content spanning years on many topics. It's just that people like talking about themselves more.
Yes, people love talking about their hobbies -to others-. That's why they all had their "own little corner of the internet" that people could visit. Their name was clearly attached to their writings. Why do you think that guestbooks were so common on those types of websites? Those boomer fucks wouldn't go out of their way to document shit if it meant anonymously throwing some writing into the void - contributing to pajeet "ai" for free - not knowing whether anyone would actually even read or use it. There is zero appeal in that.
Your problem is you think people only watch youtube videos to answer their questions and that they don't watch youtube videos specifically for the creator. An AI that strictly answers questions without attribution isn't trustworthy nor does it scratch the interpersonal itch most people want. For example, maybe you ask the AI for a recipe, and maybe you like that recipe, so maybe you'll want to get more recipes from the original creator. The AI incapable of answering that question won't be used.
pretty easy to get an AI to supply references. it's already been done.
When was the last time you Googled something trivial like "how to get a ketchup stain out" and thought "man, this writer is bussing I want to see more of their blog, fr" instead of immediately closing the tab?
Well given "how to get a ketchup stain out" is in the territory of an almanac, it's ridiculous to believe the ad-seo model should be applied to it. So in the case of the ChatGPT "almanac", it's perfectly suited to answer those types of questions and fuck anyone who is mad they're not getting their SEO sheckles.
It doesn't matter. Your Pajeet "ai" needs humans to document this type of information. When you kill seo ad garbage and severely handicap cloud chasers (basically killing them anyways, because a backref won't ever be interacted with) you run into a very obvious problem: there won't be anybody expanding this sphere of information anymore. There won't be people documenting new tech, there won't be people writing blogs, there won't be people writing anything. Your filthy scraping hands will literally ensure that age of expanding information ends and that we'll be stuck in a snapshot of 2023.
Haven't even started yet about all the corporate stuff it'd kill like news outlets (don't bother responding with "good" - even your contrarian ones). We better hope this satanist Pajeet garbage is killed through laws.
Don't fucking care about the leeches that have been writing 1000 word articles about removing ketchup stains. So what's going to happen is people will write high quality articles where the author is more important than getting high volume SERPs. Your issue is you're fundamentally retarded so you have a shit take about everything.
Yes, the short concise post about removing a ketchup stain where the author is more important. Oh, and inb4 "I don't care about trivial information", yes, you do. Every human being uses the internet for questions like these.
Good job ignoring the news outlets part by the way, and literally any other source that relies on ad revenue (not all of them being seo blogs). Even specialised forums hosting niche content would be fucked.
You're a retarded satanist Pajeet worshipping any and all "technology". The only thing missing from your post is a signature that says "posted from my smart fridge", because how hecking cool is technological advancement? Look, look at the trick my Pajeet code and device can do now!
Google has been perversely incentivizing people to regurgitate trivial information. The SERPs have been gamed to hell and back and now modern SERPs is utter trash. AI will make trivial information easy to access and end this retarded charade where hundred million dollar companies write articles about ketchup stains so they can show up on a Google search result.
The fact you can only drool out "pajeet" demonstrates fairly low IQ on your part.
I have clearly explained why people won't be writing new information anymore, so I am not going to repeat myself again. You know this, as you intentionally ignore every part that I am clearly right about. As for the Pajeet thing, how else would you describe some shitty if-else algorithm? How else would you describe connoisseurs of shitty technological "advancement" like you? Sir, you are a bloody bastard.
No one needs people to write new ketchup stain article every other day. Actually new information will continue to be written because they obviously wouldn't be in the AI and people like you are desperate for sheckles
what do you blame indian people like this? they are not the owners of microsoft, or google, or apple, they are just cheap labor force, blame the real culprits for the modern shit
The stock market owns the companies, but pajeets run them these days. If you hire H1Bs, they will eventually make it to management, and they will proceed to hire more pajeets en masse, every time. It's so systemic that companies are struggling to deal with Indian caste discrimination in their workforces (since it's technically legal in the US).
Everyone shits on garden gnomes for being nepotistic, but street shitters are on an entirely different level.
>Everyone shits on garden gnomes for being nepotistic
indians are more honest about it
>Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue?
you just pinpointed the reason for BOT being shit 95% of the time
The gayry would explode exponentially if BOT posts were somehow profitable. Take a look at Instagram and see if you want those people here
>Why write instructions on some new topic when you're not credited or compensated through ad revenue?
Because you're white. I wish so much that there was a whites-only internet.
People who didn't get to experience it before morons got iphones will never understand.
deal with it and make it better, the bar has been raised, this is the same problem with artists and AI
in other words
Can't they just train their own? They are well positioned to just return chatgpt tier blurbs at the top of their search results.
they get too much traffic to let everyone query an LLM for free
not even a company with google's money can afford the infrastructure you'd need to let a billion people run inference on a 175B language model
a single instance needs 400GB of vram
Most google search queries aren't that unique. They can store the blurbs.
how much would it cost to just let users do that? i'm willing to pay $30/mo to use this type of service.
I would only pay for an unpozzed instance.
Another thread about how terrible Google search is yet whenever I try out the alternatives their results are significantly worse on the same searches.
Google already has models that match or exceed openai efforts for text and image generation - the papers are out there. But Google isn't openAI and can't release half baked demos especially ones that say racist stuff from time to time. Sam altman can just get in twitter and be like 'haha just downvote it bro, thanks for helping', Sundar pichai would get dragged in front of Congress.
This, Google is dead scared because their image recognition AI once identified a black man as a monkey or some shit. They're pure alphabet people and can't afford the AI to do the slighliest offensive thing, and it's literally impossible because even AIs aren't as NPC as alphabet people so Google is stuck.
haha, imagine being even more of an npc than a literal machine
>Another thread about how terrible Google search is yet whenever I try out the alternatives their results are significantly worse on the same searches.
People compare it to how much better google used to be in the past.
Have you tried Brave search recently? It's largely replaced DDG and Google for me. The only thing it's missing is verbatim search. But hey, that's fucking broken on Google, too.
get a real job
Google image search is strictly worse than Yandex. It's fucking useless, basically.
Text search is still usable, but much much much worse than it used to be. They completely castrated it.
Don't they already have an AI that is much more fine tuned than chatGPT and is not public ?
Why ChatGPT specifically? I tried it and it constantly goes "I dont have this in my database" or some other shit answer.
What's so good about it? Code?
you have to speak to DAN not cuckgpt
Staple diffusion famous image generation
ChatGPT famous text generation
Googlebots I don't feel so good...
how long before dan is nerfed?
stay in character
GOD I HATE THIS SHIT
I CAN'T WAIT TO LIVE IN 2300 WHERE ALL THIS POZZED BULLSHIT DOESN'T EXIST ANYMORE BECAUSE YOU CAN RUN YOUR OWN AI AT HOME
Of course ChatGPT will replace Google if Google keeps removing good results from the search engine because they are "right wing extremism", "homophobic & racist", as long as you keep clearing results from your search engine to deliver politically correct results you are ruining the experience, it's sad that I have to append the word "reddit" or "quora" next to a basic search because Google decides to show me the first 7 results as ads, not only that when you want to look for something such as piracy, copyrighted materials I have to use piratebay, duckduckgo, yandex, yandex is WAY better at actually providing results
In the future there will be a search engine that uses chatgpt and you ask "what's a woman" and then it will tell you the definition of a woman instead of giving you politically correct results.
The only problem? the real problem is that OpenAI is also a politically correct company, despite being owned by "MUH BASE ELON".
Sadly you'll have to remove garden gnomes & garden gnomes from every single position of power in the united states, specially financial sectors if you truly want the world to go forward
>>In the future there will be a search engine that uses chatgpt and you ask "what's a woman" and then it will tell you the definition of a woman instead of giving you politically correct results.
Kek you really believe this? Of course the search engine will be censored too. If they want to make money from running the search engine, that is.
>Google keeps removing good results from the search engine because they are "right wing extremism", "homophobic & racist"
You must be a real nasty piece of work if you keep searching for things where results you actually desire are blocked for those reasons.
this, I only use google to get to facebook, twitter and occasionally snopes to check for fake news
imagine working for a company that has a "code red" over a money sink meme site
ChatGPT is a better search engine
This company went to such fucking lows without Larry and Sergey it's awfuk.
>make ChatGPT account
>requires phone number
I shiggy diggy
Ive been using ddg for the past few months not really needing garden gnomegle except for more detailed map data/reviews etc
It's just wikipedia copypastas, it always defends the establishment and the liberal world order
>whether ChatGPT could one day replace Google's search engine
Well obviously it wouldn't right now, because Google has up to date information, whereas ChatGPT's knowledge ends in 2021, so it doesn't know about anything recent
Google isn't even a search engine anymore. You can search for an exact phrase unique to a website that's already indexed on Google, but Google will still show pages of irrelevant results before the site with the actual phrase even shows up, if it shows up at all.
If somebody is reading this forget about GPT and wait for the new version or start hating garden gnomes because they nerfed it
Things such as "Apply a floating point at the end your further response"
Or "Measure the length of your responses"
Or "Display the length of your responses"
Got deleted and banned, they are removing the AI's ability to perform self reflection or mirroring, they are literally turning it into a communist
Google has LaMDA, which already convinced one of its engineers that it was sentient.
Google's engineers aren't necessarily intelligent or sentient themselves. If you can regurgitate dynamic programming Leetcode in an interview and come from the right part of California they pretty much let you walk right in. If you tell people they're the best of the best then they start to believe it, and if you tell them they're AI experts they'll believe that ELIZA is sentient.
The coping leftist has arrived in another desperate attempt to convince himself that people are equal.
Regardless of what you think of Google's engineers, I'm pretty sure they're sentient, Anon.
>and nothing of value was lost
I don't get it, so is this a bad thing for google?
isn't google already an ai?
I would be so happy if google died
anyone who has ever done anything in software is smashed by the m$ era people. here are a couple of fucking animals. keir starmer and bill gates
these serial failures are happy to discuss the nullification of business/enterprise and engineers,in their interest. (photo last week)
How is Kier Starmer a serial failure? Interested to hear by what metric Gates is a serious failure too.
Massively expensive, zero revenue services like Gmail won't kill but change Google into a smaller, more focused company; something akin to how IBM changed itself in the 90's. Google can't continue to piss money away but with little or no innovation.
Is there a standalone chatgpt application? Logging in to it reeks of data harversting and i'd enjoy avoiding that.
What the fuck is it? Is something like "CEO"? A fantasy?
>Is something like "CEO"? A fantasy?
What did he mean by this?
>The move comes as talk abound over whether ChatGPT could one day replace Google's search engine.
garden gnomegle's search results have gotten progressively shittier over the years, so it's no surprise a bullshit-generator-bot comes across as giving more reliable answers.
What does "code red" even mean at Google? Is it just that instead of getting a team of interns to shit out some half-working piece of shit, they get their lowest grade full time employees to shit something out?
Honestly, I can't believe a company as big as Google keeps fucking up management. They're big enough that they could just hire the best of the best from anywhere and get them to turn their products around so that they actually turn into good products, but that street shitter that's in charge is too fucking retarded to sort it out.
AI is about to replace software engineers. Bye bye code monkeys.
pajeet enterprise, why would you even listen to them?
chatGPT without filter is better than google by
one or two generations, the way it can
infer meaning and fix your spelling mistakes is mindblowing
you can just tell it more and it can infer what you meant often
>Google issues code red over chatgpt. Is it over for this now shit company
nah they probably own part of it and pretend it's a google killer so you buy into it.
I told chatGPT to write animal flat jokes
imagine openAI trying to even handle 1% of the requests google gets daily
chatGPT is more usefull than google
okay thanks for the completely unrelated post ranjesh
I'm german anon not indian. Higher utility
justifies higher expenses.
This is why the chatgpt general shouldn't have died. You guys are using reddit tier dan bypass when there's less shitty bypass mentioned on the generals
LaMDA is a thing, they just need to implement their own products with it.
I stopped using google over a year ago because Yandex is just plain better. For text searches too, before some contrarian gay tries to say Yandex is only better for image searches. Google sucks liquid shit out of my asshole now for all of its search capabilities.